Next Article in Journal
The Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation (AISI): A Novel Prognostic Biomarker in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Next Article in Special Issue
Current Management Options in Irvine–Gass Syndrome: A Systemized Review
Previous Article in Journal
Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Older Patient
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dysregulated Tear Film Proteins in Macular Edema Due to the Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Are Involved in the Regulation of Protein Clearance, Inflammation, and Neovascularization
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Update on the Management of Uveitic Macular Edema

J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(18), 4133; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184133
by Slawomir Jan Teper
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(18), 4133; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184133
Submission received: 15 August 2021 / Revised: 7 September 2021 / Accepted: 11 September 2021 / Published: 14 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Macular Edema: The Current Recommendations for Clinical Practice)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this review, author compiled the information on current options for treatment of uveitic macular edema (UME). In this review, author tried to focus on non infectious uveitis and covered various treatment options like local and systemic drugs, including steroids, immunomodulators, VEGF inhibitors and  biological drugs. Here are few points that helps to improve the manuscript:

  1. The title of the review "How to manage macular edema in uveitis?" looks premature. Suggested title might be " An recent updates on management of uveitic macular edema".
  2. There are typo in manuscript for example in line 57 title of table mentioned as Table 2 however the title of table should be table 1 and In line no. 125 injection injection written two times.

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your review.

The title has been changed.

Professional proofreading / editing was done to ensure higher quality English in the article.

Kindest regards,

Slawomir Teper

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper has relevant and well-organized content, but the poor English grammar makes it very difficult to read and review.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your review.

I am sorry for English grammar - professional proofreading / editing was done to ensure higher quality English in the article.

Kindest regards,

Slawomir Teper

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Author responded to my query.

Back to TopTop