You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open Access

1 October 2021

Impact of Infliximab Biosimilar CT-P13 Dose and Infusion Interval on Real-World Drug Survival and Effectiveness in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Rheumatology, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61469, Korea
2
Department of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, 222-1 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea
3
School of Medicine, Inha University, Jung-Seok Building C Dong, 605 Ho. 366 Seohae-daero, Jung-gu, Incheon 22332, Korea
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea
J. Clin. Med.2021, 10(19), 4568;https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194568
This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology
Version Notes
Order Reprints
Review Reports

Abstract

CT-P13 is an infliximab biosimilar approved for indications including ankylosing spondylitis (AS); the approved maintenance regimen is 5 mg/kg infused every 6–8 weeks. In clinical practice, modifications to infliximab dose and/or infusion interval can be beneficial to the patient. For CT-P13, real-world data on dose and/or interval adjustment are lacking. This analysis investigated the impact of such treatment pattern changes on effectiveness and drug survival up to five years for adult (≥18 years old) patients with AS in the Korean, real-world, retrospective rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis (RAAS) study. Overall, 337 patients with AS were identified: 219 who initiated infliximab treatment with CT-P13 (‘naïve’) and 118 who switched from reference infliximab to CT-P13 (‘switched’). Overall, 18/235 (7.7%), 110/224 (49.1%), and 101/186 (54.3%) evaluable patients had dose, infusion interval, or combined treatment pattern changes, respectively. More naïve (61.0%) versus switched (42.6%) patients had treatment pattern changes. Overall, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index scores decreased from baseline to week 54, then remained stable; improvements were greater for patients with than without treatment pattern changes. Drug survival did not differ significantly between patients with or without treatment pattern changes. Findings suggest that adjusting dose and/or infusion interval can improve clinical outcomes for CT-P13-treated patients with AS.

1. Introduction

The infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 has received regulatory approval in 98 countries as of March 2021. In patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), the Program evaLuating the Autoimmune disease iNvEstigational drug cT-p13 in AS patients (PLANETAS) study demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence between reference infliximab and CT-P13, both administered using a maintenance regimen of 5 mg/kg once every eight weeks []. Comparability of efficacy and safety profiles was also demonstrated []. In the one-year open-label extension, switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 was shown to be safe, with no adverse impact on efficacy []. The intravenous (IV) formulation of CT-P13 is licensed for use in the same indications as reference infliximab by the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in the Republic of Korea [,,,,,]. For AS, the approved maintenance regimen is 5 mg/kg infused once every six weeks [] or once every 6–8 weeks [,].
Studies show that initiating lower-dose (3 mg/kg) infliximab treatment can be effective for the treatment of AS [,,,,,,]. Positive outcomes with infliximab dose modification have also been observed in other rheumatic diseases. In patients with psoriatic arthritis, initiating infliximab treatment at doses lower than 5 mg/kg did not significantly impact drug survival or treatment response [,], while in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating lower-dose infliximab treatment, limited infliximab dose escalations (by increasing dose or decreasing infusion interval) have been associated with improved clinical responses and drug survival [,]. In patients with AS, individualized dose/interval adjustments based on treatment response may be warranted to achieve clinical targets in some cases [,,,]. In addition, lower-dose infliximab has been demonstrated to be well-tolerated in patients with AS [,,,,,], and is associated with significantly lower health care system costs [,]. To our knowledge, the potential benefits of dose and/or interval adjustments have not been investigated for an infliximab biosimilar treatment in AS to date. In addition, real-world data are not currently available regarding dose and/or interval adjustments in patients with AS who have switched from reference to biosimilar infliximab.
The rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis (RAAS) study was a real-world, retrospective analysis aiming to provide long-term (up to 5-year) data on CT-P13 drug survival, safety, and efficacy in patients with RA and AS []. The current analysis investigated the impact of changes to CT-P13 treatment patterns (doses and infusion intervals) on effectiveness and drug survival for patients with AS in the RAAS study. This included patients who were infliximab-naïve at CT-P13 initiation or those who had a non-medical switch from reference infliximab to CT-P13.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. RAAS Study Design and Patients

As reported previously [], the RAAS study was a non-interventional, retrospective, multicenter analysis of medical records for adult (≥18 years old) patients with RA or AS conducted at five referral university hospitals in the Republic of Korea. This ad hoc analysis included patients with AS who had received ≥1 dose of CT-P13 between 1 September 2012 and 31 December 2017, and were either reference infliximab-naïve at CT-P13 initiation (naïve patients) or had a non-medical switch to CT-P13 from reference infliximab (switched patients).

2.2. Dose and Infusion Interval Analysis

Patients were analyzed by baseline dose and divided into three groups (<4 mg/kg; ≥4–<5 mg/kg; ≥5 mg/kg). The baseline dose was defined as the third infusion dose for naïve patients (induction period dosing was excluded from the analysis for comparability with switched patients) or the first infusion dose for switched patients. If the dose remained within the same grouping (<4 mg/kg; ≥4–<5 mg/kg; ≥5 mg/kg) between baseline and the last follow-up, patients were analyzed in the constant dose group. If the dose did not remain within the same grouping between baseline and the last follow-up, patients were analyzed in the changed dose group, comprising the increased dose group (last follow-up dose grouping > baseline dose grouping) and the decreased dose group (last follow-up dose grouping < baseline dose grouping).
Baseline infusion intervals (in weeks) were calculated as the average of the three infusion intervals after the baseline dose, and the follow-up infusion interval was the average of the last three infusion intervals. If the follow-up interval was unchanged from baseline (a difference of less than one week between baseline and follow-up infusion intervals), patients were analyzed in the constant interval group. If there were changes in infusion interval, patients were analyzed in the changed interval group. This comprised the increased interval group (where the follow-up infusion interval was at least one week longer than the baseline infusion interval) and the decreased interval group (where the follow-up infusion interval was shorter than the baseline infusion interval by at least one week).
In addition, patients with both constant dose and infusion interval (combined constant group) were compared with those with changes in dose and/or infusion interval (combined changed group).

2.3. Assessments

As reported previously [], demographic data were assessed at baseline immediately prior to CT-P13 dosing. Disease characteristics, including Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score, were assessed prior to CT-P13 dosing at each clinical visit []. Time points for BASDAI score analysis were selected considering differences in measurement schedule between patients []. Data on infliximab treatment history (to determine whether patients were naïve or switched) and CT-P13 dosing (weekly date of administration, body weight at each dose, and dose received) were also collected [].

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test, chi-squared test, one-way analysis of variance, Fisher’s exact test, or Wilcoxon’s rank sum test. Drug survival was assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis; this was based on the period of time between the first and last doses of CT-P13 for patients who discontinued CT-P13 []. Patients who did not discontinue CT-P13, or discontinued CT-P13 because of pregnancy or remission, were censored at the last follow-up date. Drug survival was analyzed statistically by log-rank test. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Patients

Overall, 337 patients with AS (219 naïve; 118 switched) were identified in the RAAS study. Among the patients with baseline dose data, overall, most patients were male (74.8%) (Table 1).
Table 1. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by baseline dose (overall population).
Follow-up dose and infusion interval information were available for 235 and 224 patients, respectively (Figure 1a,b). Out of 235 evaluable patients, 18 (7.7%) had dose changes (increased dose: 12; decreased dose: 6). Of the 224 evaluable patients, 110 (49.1%) had interval changes (increased interval: 79; decreased interval: 31). In the combined analysis, 85 of 186 (45.7%) evaluable patients did not have dose and/or interval changes and comprised the combined constant group (Figure 1c). A greater proportion of naïve (61.0%) versus switched (42.6%) patients had dose and/or interval changes; these patients formed the combined changed group.
Figure 1. Analysis groups: (a) dose analysis groups, (b) interval analysis groups, and (c) combined dose/interval analysis groups. 1 Baseline dose was missing for 67 patients due to missing weight information (n = 57) or missing dose after the induction period in naïve patients (n = 10). 2 Baseline infusion interval was missing for 34 patients as there was no fourth infusion for naïve patients (n = 27) or no second infusion for switched patients (n = 7). AS, ankylosing spondylitis.

3.2. Dose Analyses

In total, 71, 117, and 82 patients were included in the <4 mg/kg, ≥4–<5 mg/kg, and ≥5 mg/kg baseline dose groups, respectively. Most baseline demographics and disease characteristics were comparable between the baseline dose groups overall (Table 1) and for patients in the naïve (Table S1) and switched (Table S2) groups, although there were statistically significant differences in age between the baseline dose groups, both overall and for naïve or switched patients. Patients in the <4 mg/kg baseline dose group had the lowest median BASDAI scores overall (Table 1), although scores differed substantially between naïve patients (7.00; Table S1) and switched patients (0.57; Table S2). Switched patients had lower baseline BASDAI scores than naïve patients across baseline dose groups (Tables S1 and S2). Naïve patients with lower baseline doses tended to have lower baseline BASDAI scores, although differences between groups were not significant (Table S1). For switched patients, differences in baseline BASDAI score were significantly different between baseline dose groups, with median scores of 0.57, 1.01, and 4.24 in the <4 mg/kg, ≥4–<5 mg/kg, and ≥5 mg/kg baseline dose groups, respectively (Table S2).
Following initial decreases as naïve patients initiated CT-P13, median BASDAI scores remained consistent over time (Table 2). For the ≥4–<5 mg/kg and ≥5 mg/kg baseline dose groups, post-baseline median BASDAI scores were broadly comparable between naïve and switched patients. In the <4 mg/kg baseline dose group, naïve patients tended to have higher post-baseline median BASDAI scores than switched patients.
Table 2. Median (IQR) BASDAI scores 1 by treatment group for baseline dose analysis groups.
Mean cumulative annual maintenance doses were similar through Years 1–4 and were similar between naïve and switched patients throughout (Figure 2). Cumulative doses were lower for Year 5, reflecting the few evaluable patients. Drug survival did not differ significantly between baseline dose groups overall or for naïve patients (Figure 3a,b). For switched patients, drug survival appeared numerically lower in the ≥5 mg/kg baseline dose group compared with the other dose groups, but these differences were not statistically different (Figure 3c).
Figure 2. Mean cumulative annual maintenance dose and mean infusion interval by treatment group. Adapted with permission from Lee, S.S.; Kim, T.H.; Park, W.; Song, Y.W.; Suh, C.H.; Kim, S.; Yoo, D.H. (2021). © 2021 Authors (or their employer(s)) []. 1 Few patients were evaluable at Year 5.
Figure 3. Drug survival by baseline dose group: (a) overall, (b) naïve patients, and (c) switched patients.
Most baseline demographics and disease characteristics were comparable between constant dose, increased dose, and decreased dose groups, overall (Table S3) and for naïve (Table S4) and switched (Table S5) patients.

3.3. Infusion Interval Analyses

Median (IQR) baseline infusion intervals were 8.0 (7.0–9.0) weeks, 8.0 (6.0–8.0) weeks, and 8.0 (8.0–9.0) weeks in the overall (n = 303), naïve (n = 192), and switched (n = 111) groups, respectively. Mean infusion intervals increased slightly between Years 1 and 3 in all groups before decreasing in Year 4 (particularly in the naïve group) (Figure 2). Consistent with the baseline findings, switched patients had longer infusion intervals than naïve patients throughout. Median annual infusion numbers were comparable between groups throughout the study period and remained consistent between Years 1 and 4 (Table S6). These were reduced in Year 5, when the number of evaluable patients was lower.
Most baseline demographics and disease characteristics were comparable between constant interval, increased interval, and decreased interval groups, overall (Table S7) and for naïve (Table S8) and switched (Table S9) patients. Switched patients in the constant interval group were relatively evenly distributed between baseline dose groups. In the increased interval group, 58.3% of switched patients were in the <4 mg/kg baseline dose group, while 69.2% of switched patients with decreased infusion intervals had a baseline dose of ≥4–<5 mg/kg. Naïve patients were most commonly in the ≥4–<5 mg/kg baseline dose group, regardless of interval analysis group.

3.4. Combination Analyses

Most baseline characteristics were comparable between the combined constant and combined changed groups, overall (Table S10) and for naïve (Table S11) and switched (Table S12) patients. However, median baseline C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were significantly higher overall in the combined changed than in the combined constant group. There were no significant differences in BASDAI scores between the combined constant and combined changed groups overall and for switched patients, but baseline BASDAI scores differed significantly between these groups for naïve patients. Overall, a similar proportion of patients in the <4 mg/kg baseline dose group were in the combined constant (24.7%) and combined changed (30.7%) groups. Switched patients in the combined constant group were most likely to be in the ≥5 mg/kg baseline dose group (43.6% patients). In the combined changed group, only 13.8% of switched patients were in the ≥5 mg/kg baseline dose group. Naïve patients were most likely to be in the ≥4–<5 mg/kg baseline dose group, regardless of the combined analysis group.
After decreases from baseline to week 54 overall and for naïve patients, BASDAI scores remained stable throughout the study (Figure 4 and Table S13). Patients in the combined changed versus the combined constant group had greater improvements in BASDAI score over time. There were no significant differences in drug survival between the combined constant and combined changed groups overall or for naïve or switched patients (Figure 5).
Figure 4. Mean BASDAI scores 1 by treatment group for combined constant and combined changed groups. 1 BASDAI results are not presented for week 264 as there was only one evaluable patient. BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index.
Figure 5. Drug survival for combined constant and combined changed groups: (a) overall, (b) naïve patients, and (c) switched patients.

4. Discussion

This analysis provides valuable long-term data on CT-P13 treatment patterns in patients with AS in routine clinical practice. In our analysis, just over half of the evaluable patients maintained a constant CT-P13 dose and infusion interval throughout, while changes to infusion interval were more common than changes to dose. Greater improvements in BASDAI scores observed in the combined changed versus combined constant group suggest that adjusting dose and/or infusion interval can improve clinical outcomes for patients with AS receiving CT-P13 treatment. Drug survival was comparable between baseline dose groups, with no adverse impact of lower baseline doses. In addition, there was no significant effect of dose and/or interval adjustments on drug survival, as this was comparable between the combined constant and combined changed groups.
Overall, 54.3% of patients maintained their baseline dose and infusion interval throughout the period of CT-P13 treatment captured in the RAAS study (up to five years). Treatment pattern changes were more common for naïve than switched patients, reflecting the need to optimize the CT-P13 regimen in patients newly initiating infliximab therapy. Cumulative annual maintenance doses were similar for naïve and switched patients throughout, although switched patients had longer infusion intervals. Overall, similar proportions of patients in the lowest baseline dose group (<4 mg/kg) either did or did not have treatment changes during the study, reflecting the findings of previous studies, demonstrating that initiating lower-dose infliximab treatment (3 mg/kg) can be effective [,,,,,,], but that treatment pattern changes may be required for some patients [,,,]. While dose escalation may be more common for infliximab than other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) in patients with AS, this could be explained by the ease of adjusting IV-administered doses of reference infliximab compared with the fixed doses inherent to the subcutaneous (SC) administration of other TNFis [].
In this analysis, median BASDAI scores were reduced following CT-P13 treatment for patients overall and in naïve treatment groups, regardless of the baseline dose group, while scores were maintained over time for switched patients. This supports previous reports of the effectiveness of infliximab treatment at doses lower than the approved regimen for patients with AS [,,,,,,]. BASDAI scores remained stable both in the combined constant and combined changed groups, after initial decreases for naïve patients (reflected in the overall population). This is consistent with findings from the RAAS study overall []. There was no initial decrease in BASDAI scores for switched patients, reflecting the possibility of most switched patients having achieved disease control with reference infliximab prior to undergoing a non-medical switch to CT-P13. Consistent BASDAI scores demonstrate that disease activity was well controlled regardless of treatment pattern changes or infliximab treatment history. This supports the lack of impact of switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 on efficacy/effectiveness demonstrated for patients with AS [,,] and in studies including patients with AS, axial spondyloarthritis, or spondyloarthritis [,,,].
Drug survival was comparable regardless of the baseline dose or treatment pattern changes. For switched patients, drug survival appeared numerically lower for patients in the ≥5 mg/kg baseline dose group; however, there were no statistically significant differences between baseline dose groups. This subset of switched patients in the ≥5 mg/kg baseline dose group may not have had as well-controlled disease as did patients in the other baseline dose groups prior to switching to CT-P13 (demonstrated by higher baseline BASDAI scores). This may account for the numerically lower drug survival. The comparability of drug survival regardless of baseline dose or treatment pattern changes complements the previous report from the RAAS study demonstrating no significant difference in CT-P13 drug survival between naïve and switched patients with AS []. Overall 5-year drug survival in this study exceeded 60%, broadly in keeping with previous reports for reference infliximab [,,,,,], and reflecting the comparability of drug retention demonstrated between CT-P13 and reference infliximab after up to four years in the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics Registry []. Drug survival in this study was somewhat higher than the 50% reported after four years of low-dose (3 mg/kg) reference infliximab treatment in a Canadian prospective observational analysis [].
The current analysis relied on medical records for data collection, which may have been incomplete, limiting the conclusions that can be drawn []. Since some patients did not visit the hospital at regular intervals, implementation of regular interval adjustment windows was required for the analysis of BASDAI scores. In addition, there were few evaluable patients in Year 5, although the overall population and naïve and switched groups were large. The analysis was conducted in a single country, although it included patients treated at five university hospitals. Taken together, the sample size and setting provide good representation of biologic-treated patients with AS in the Republic of Korea. Safety analyses were not conducted as part of this investigation; however, previous reports have demonstrated the safety of CT-P13 treatment for patients with AS or spondyloarthritis, including after switching from reference infliximab [,,,,].
In conclusion, our findings suggest that an individualized treatment approach—through adjusting dose and/or infusion interval—can improve clinical outcomes for CT-P13-treated patients with AS, without adversely affecting drug survival. This provides valuable information for the management of biosimilar treatment for patients with AS in clinical practice.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm10194568/s1, Table S1: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by baseline dose group (naïve patients), Table S2: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by baseline dose group (switched patients), Table S3: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by dose analysis group (overall), Table S4: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by dose analysis group (naïve patients), Table S5: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by dose analysis group (switched patients), Table S6: Median (IQR) numbers of annual infusions overall and for naïve and switched patients, Table S7: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by interval analysis group (overall), Table S8: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by interval analysis group (naïve patients), Table S9: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by interval analysis group (switched patients), Table S10: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by combined analysis group (overall), Table S11: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by combined analysis group (naïve patients), Table S12: Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by combined analysis group (switched patients), Table S13: Median (IQR) BASDAI scores by treatment group for combined analysis groups.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.P., S.-K.K., and D.-H.Y.; Methodology, W.P., S.-K.K., and D.-H.Y.; Formal analysis, W.P. and D.-H.Y.; Investigation, S.-S.L., T.-H.K., W.P., Y.-W.S., C.-H.S., and D.-H.Y.; Data curation, S.-S.L. and T.-H.K.; Writing—original draft preparation, All authors; Writing—review and editing, All authors; Supervision, W.P., S.-K.K., and D.-H.Y.; Project administration, W.P., S.-K.K., and D.-H.Y.; Funding acquisition, S.-K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Celltrion Healthcare Co. Ltd. (Incheon, Republic of Korea).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Boards at each study center: Ajou University Hospital Institutional Review Board, AJIRB-MED-MDB-17-449 (approved 10 January 2018); Chonnam National University Hospital Institutional Review Board, CNUH-2018-030 (approved 8 February 2018); Hanyang University Hospital Institutional Review Board, HYU 2017-12-037 (approved 27 December 2017); Inha University Hospital Institutional Review Board, INHAUH201712010 (approved 4 January 2018); Seoul National University College of Medicine/Seoul National University Hospital Institutional Review Board, H-1801-047-914 (approved 24 April 2018).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the current article and accompanying supplementary materials.

Acknowledgments

Medical writing support including development of a draft outline and subsequent drafts in consultation with the authors, collating author comments, copy editing, fact checking, and referencing was provided by Beatrice Tyrrell, DPhil, at Aspire Scientific Limited (Bollington, UK). Funding for medical writing support for this article was provided by Celltrion Healthcare Co. Ltd. (Incheon, Republic of Korea). A poster reporting selected findings from this analysis was presented at the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2021 Congress (2–5 June 2021; online).

Conflicts of Interest

W.P. declares speaker’s honoraria from Celltrion. S.-K.K. is an employee of and owns stock/stock options in Celltrion Healthcare. D.-H.Y. declares participation in the speaker’s bureau for Celltrion and Celltrion Healthcare. S.-S.L., T.-H.K., Y.-W.S., and C.-H.S. declare no conflicts of interest. Celltrion Healthcare participated in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Park, W.; Hrycaj, P.; Jeka, S.; Kovalenko, V.; Lysenko, G.; Miranda, P.; Mikazane, H.; Gutierrez-Ureña, S.; Lim, M.; Lee, Y.A.; et al. A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, prospective study comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: The PLANETAS study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Park, W.; Yoo, D.H.; Miranda, P.; Brzosko, M.; Wiland, P.; Gutierrez-Ureña, S.; Mikazane, H.; Lee, Y.A.; Smiyan, S.; Lim, M.J.; et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 compared with maintenance of CT-P13 in ankylosing spondylitis: 102-week data from the PLANETAS extension study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. US Food and Drug Administration. Inflectra Prescribing Information. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/125544s009lbl.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  4. European Medicines Agency. Remsima Summary of Product Characteristics. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/remsima-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  5. US Food and Drug Administration. Remicade Prescribing Information. Available online: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2020/103772s5389s5391s5394lbl.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  6. European Medicines Agency. Inflectra Summary of Product Characteristics. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/inflectra-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  7. European Medicines Agency. Remicade Prescribing Information. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/remicade-epar-product-information_en.pdf (accessed on 16 February 2021).
  8. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Biological products (recombinant DNA products): Celltrion, Inc. Available online: https://www.mfds.go.kr/eng/brd/m_30/view.do?seq=69797 (accessed on 23 February 2021).
  9. Maksymowych, W.P.; Jhangri, G.S.; Lambert, R.G.; Mallon, C.; Buenviaje, H.; Pedrycz, E.; Luongo, R.; Russell, A.S. Infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: A prospective observational inception cohort analysis of efficacy and safety. J. Rheumatol. 2002, 29, 959–965. [Google Scholar]
  10. Maksymowych, W.P.; Salonen, D.; Inman, R.D.; Rahman, P.; Lambert, R.G. Low-dose infliximab (3 mg/kg) significantly reduces spinal inflammation on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized placebo-controlled study. J. Rheumatol. 2010, 37, 1728–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cherouvim, E.P.; Zintzaras, E.; Boki, K.A.; Moutsopoulos, H.M.; Manoussakis, M.N. Infliximab therapy for patients with active and refractory spondyloarthropathies at the dose of 3 mg/kg: A 20-month open treatment. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2004, 10, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tenga, G.; Goëb, V.; Lequerré, T.; Bacquet-Deschryver, H.; Daragon, A.; Pouplin, S.; Lanfant-Weybel, K.; Le Loët, X.; Dieu, B.; Vittecoq, O. A 3 mg/kg starting dose of infliximab in active spondyloarthritis resistant to conventional treatments is efficient, safe and lowers costs. Jt. Bone Spine 2011, 78, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Inman, R.D.; Maksymowych, W.P. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of low dose infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis. J. Rheumatol. 2010, 37, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Keeling, S.; Oswald, A.; Russell, A.S.; Maksymowych, W.P. Prospective observational analysis of the efficacy and safety of low-dose (3 mg/kg) infliximab in ankylosing spondylitis: 4-year followup. J. Rheumatol. 2006, 33, 558–561. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jois, R.N.; Leeder, J.; Gibb, A.; Gaffney, K.; Macgregor, A.; Somerville, M.; Scott, D.G. Low-dose infliximab treatment for ankylosing spondylitis—clinically- and cost-effective. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006, 45, 1566–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Glintborg, B.; Gudbjornsson, B.; Steen Krogh, N.; Omerovic, E.; Manilo, N.; Holland-Fischer, M.; Lindegaard, H.M.; Gitte Loft, A.; Nordin, H.; Johnsen, L.; et al. Impact of different infliximab dose regimens on treatment response and drug survival in 462 patients with psoriatic arthritis: Results from the nationwide registries DANBIO and ICEBIO. Rheumatology 2014, 53, 2100–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gudbjornsson, B.; Geirsson, A.J.; Krogh, N.S. Low starting dosage of infliximab with possible escalating dosage in psoriatic arthritis gives the same treatment results as standard dosage of adalimumab or etanercept: Results from the nationwide Icelandic ICEBIO registry. Psoriasis (Auckl) 2018, 8, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nozaki, Y.; Nagare, Y.; Ashida, C.; Tomita, D.; Okada, A.; Inoue, A.; Kinoshita, K.; Funauchi, M.; Matsumura, I. Infliximab dose adjustment can improve the clinical and radiographic outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients: REVIVE study results. Biologics 2018, 12, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Cohen, S.B.; Kremer, J.M.; Dandreo, K.J.; Reed, G.W.; Magner, R.; Shan, Y.; Kafka, S.; DeHoratius, R.J.; Ellis, L.; Parenti, D. Outcomes of infliximab dose escalation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2019, 38, 2501–2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kim, T.-H.; Lee, S.-S.; Park, W.; Song, Y.W.; Suh, C.-H.; Kim, S.; Lee, Y.N.; Yoo, D.H. A 5-year retrospective analysis of drug survival, safety, and effectiveness of the infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Clin. Drug Investig. 2020, 40, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lee, S.S.; Kim, T.H.; Park, W.; Song, Y.W.; Suh, C.H.; Kim, S.; Yoo, D. POS0911 Similar clinical responses achieved with lower versus standard doses of infliximab biosimilar CT-P13 in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Real-world results from the RAAS study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021, 80, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Walsh, J.A.; Adejoro, O.; Chastek, B.; Park, Y. Treatment patterns of biologics in US patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Descriptive analyses from a claims database. J. Comp. Eff. Res. 2018, 7, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kaltsonoudis, E.; Pelechas, E.; Voulgari, P.V.; Drosos, A.A. Maintained clinical remission in ankylosing spondylitis patients switched from reference infliximab to its biosimilar: An 18-month comparative open-label study. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Benucci, M.; Gobbi, F.L.; Bandinelli, F.; Damiani, A.; Infantino, M.; Grossi, V.; Manfredi, M.; Parisi, S.; Fusaro, E.; Batticciotto, A.; et al. Safety, efficacy and immunogenicity of switching from innovator to biosimilar infliximab in patients with spondyloarthritis: A 6-month real-life observational study. Immunol. Res. 2017, 65, 419–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Valido, A.; Silva-Dinis, J.; Saavedra, M.J.; Iria, I.; Gonçalves, J.; Lopes, J.P.; Fonseca, J.E. Efficacy, immunogenicity and cost analysis of a systematic switch from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 of all patients with inflammatory arthritis from a single center. Acta Reumatol. Port. 2019, 44, 303–311. [Google Scholar]
  26. Glintborg, B.; Sørensen, I.J.; Loft, A.G.; Lindegaard, H.; Linauskas, A.; Hendricks, O.; Hansen, I.M.J.; Jensen, D.V.; Manilo, N.; Espesen, J.; et al. A nationwide non-medical switch from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in 802 patients with inflammatory arthritis: 1-year clinical outcomes from the DANBIO registry. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 76, 1426–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jørgensen, K.K.; Olsen, I.C.; Goll, G.L.; Lorentzen, M.; Bolstad, N.; Haavardsholm, E.A.; Lundin, K.E.A.; Mørk, C.; Jahnsen, J.; Kvien, T.K. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): A 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2017, 389, 2304–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lie, E.; Kristensen, L.E.; Forsblad-d’Elia, H.; Zverkova-Sandström, T.; Askling, J.; Jacobsson, L.T. The effect of comedication with conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs on TNF inhibitor drug survival in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis: Results from a nationwide prospective study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2015, 74, 970–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kang, J.-H.; Park, D.-J.; Lee, J.-W.; Lee, K.-E.; Wen, L.; Kim, T.-J.; Park, Y.-W.; Lee, S.-S. Drug survival rates of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2014, 29, 1205–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Saougou, I.; Markatseli, T.E.; Voulgari, P.V.; Drosos, A.A. Maintained clinical response of infliximab treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: A 6-year long-term study. Jt. Bone Spine 2010, 77, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jeong, H.; Eun, Y.H.; Kim, I.Y.; Kim, H.; Ahn, J.K.; Lee, J.; Koh, E.-M.; Cha, H.-S. Drug survival of tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in Korea. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2018, 33, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lorenzin, M.; Ortolan, A.; Frallonardo, P.; Oliviero, F.; Punzi, L.; Ramonda, R. Predictors of response and drug survival in ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with infliximab. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2015, 16, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Venetsanopoulou, A.I.; Voulgari, P.V.; Alamanos, Y.; Papadopoulos, C.G.; Markatseli, T.E.; Drosos, A.A. Persistent clinical response of infliximab treatment, over a 4-year period in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol. Int. 2007, 27, 935–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kim, H.-A.; Lee, E.; Lee, S.-K.; Park, Y.-B.; Shin, K. Retention rate and efficacy of the biosimilar CT-P13 versus reference infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A propensity score-matched analysis from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics registry. BioDrugs 2020, 34, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, S.J.; Baek, K.; Lee, S.; Lee, Y.J.; Park, J.E.; Lee, S.G. Post-marketing pooled safety analysis for CT-P13 treatment of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases in observational cohort studies. BioDrugs 2020, 34, 513–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
To Close, Observe, or Reconstruct: The Third Way of Managing Dialysis Fistula Aneurysms in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Previous
Biomarker Value in the Diagnosis of Community-Acquired Pneumonia with Concomitant Chronic Heart Failure
Next