Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Influence of Personality Traits on Risk of Suicidal Behaviour in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Injuries and Their Functions with Respect to Suicide Risk in Adolescents with Conduct Disorder: Findings from a Path Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Dry Needling of Latent Trigger Points on Viscoelastic and Muscular Contractile Properties: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Within-Participant Clinical Trial
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Needling Interventions for the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain Syndromes

by
César Fernández-de-las-Peñas
1,2
1
Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain
2
Cátedra Institucional en Docencia, Clínica e Investigación en Fisioterapia: Terapia Manual, Punción Seca y Ejercicio Terapéutico, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(19), 4603; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194603
Submission received: 27 September 2021 / Accepted: 28 September 2021 / Published: 7 October 2021
Needling interventions consist of the use of filiform needles for the management of different conditions of the neuromusculoskeletal system. The most commonly used needling therapies are trigger point dry needling, an intervention showing an increasing interest in both clinical and research setting [1], and acupuncture, an intervention used from several centuries ago. In recent years, different dry needling textbooks showing multiple applications of dry needling have been published [2,3]. We present the Special Issue entitled “Needling Interventions for the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain Syndromes” to promote high-quality research on needling interventions. This issue has received special attention, with a total of 12 peer-reviewed papers, nine original articles, one review, and two meta-analyses. These texts describe clinical trials showing the effectiveness of different needling interventions such as dry needling, acupuncture, percutaneous electrolysis (needling combined with galvanic electrical current), and percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (needling combined with biphasic electrical current) for outcomes ranging from pain to improved motor strength. For instance, García-de-Miguel et al. found that the application of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) on the levator scapulae was more effective than dry needling for improving pressure pain sensitivity and related disabilities in the short term in individuals with neck pain [4]. Two randomized clinical trials demonstrated that the application of percutaneous electrolysis (needling combined with galvanic electrical current) was effective for the treatment of lateral epicondylalgia [5] or supraspinatus tendinopathy [6] when combined with an eccentric exercise program. Gallego-Sendarrubias et al., in a pilot randomized clinical trials, observed that adding two sessions of ultrasound-guided PENS (needling combined with biphasic electrical current) applied on the femoral nerve before a training strength program improves countermovement jump and squat performance speeds in recreational soccer players [7]. On the contrary, the clinical trial by Garrido-Ardila et al. revealed that acupuncture did not exert significant improvements in health-related quality of life, pain, joint stiffness, difficulty to work, and depression in women with fibromyalgia syndrome [8]. Finally, in a preliminary trial, Pérez-Bellmunt et al. found that dry needling was able to change muscle tone, relaxation, pressure pain sensitivity, and creep when applied over trigger points in the lateral gastrocnemius [9]. In addition to these clinical trials, a milestone paper using an animal model revealed the molecular effect of a particular needling intervention, e.g., percutaneous electrolysis [10]
Two studies focused on the use of ultrasound imaging: the first one for improving the safety of some potential dangerous dry needling treatments when applied on the thorax [11] and the second one suggesting that dry needling influences muscular morphology by decreasing masticatory muscle thickness as assessed with ultrasound imaging [12]
In addition, two meta-analyses support the effectiveness of trigger point dry needling for conditions that cause neck [13] and knee pain [14]. Finally, a scoping review revealed that neuropathic pain mechanisms are not routinely considered in needling approaches when treating individuals with sciatica [15]. Current and previous evidence support the effectiveness of needling interventions for the management of chronic pain conditions and the need to integrate these techniques into updated neuroscience paradigms [16].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gattie, E.; Cleland, J.A.; Snodgrass, S. A survey of American physical therapists’ current practice of dry needling: Practice patterns and adverse events. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract. 2020, 50, 102255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dommerholt, J.; Fernandez-de-las-Peñas, C. Trigger Point Dry Needling: An Evidence and Clinical-Based Approach, 2nd ed.; Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  3. Donnelly, J. (Ed.) Travell, Simons & Simons’ Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual, 3rd ed.; Wolters Kluwer: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  4. Garcia-de-Miguel, S.; Pecos-Martin, D.; Larroca-Sanz, T.; Sanz-de-Vicente, B.; Garcia-Montes, L.; Fernandez-Matias, R.; Gallego-Izquierdo, T. Short-term effects of PENS versus dry needling in subjects with unilateral mechanical neck pain and active myofascial trigger points in levator scapulae muscle: A randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rodríguez-Huguet, M.; Góngora-Rodríguez, J.; Lomas-Vega, R.; Martín-Valero, R.; Díaz-Fernández, Á.; Obrero-Gaitán, E.; Ibáñez-Vera, A.J.; Rodríguez-Almagro, D. Percutaneous electrolysis in the treatment of lateral epicondylalgia: A single-blind randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rodríguez-Huguet, M.; Góngora-Rodríguez, J.; Rodríguez-Huguet, P.; Ibañez-Vera, A.J.; Rodríguez-Almagro, D.; Martín-Valero, R.; Díaz-Fernández, Á.; Lomas-Vega, R. Effectiveness of percutaneous electrolysis in supraspinatus tendinopathy: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gallego-Sendarrubias, G.M.; Arias-Buría, J.L.; Úbeda-D’Ocasar, E.; Hervás-Pérez, J.P.; Rubio-Palomino, M.A.; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C.; Valera-Calero, J.A. Effects of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on countermovement jump and squat performance speed in male soccer players: A pilot randomized clinical trial. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Garrido-Ardila, E.M.; González-López-Arza, M.V.; Jiménez-Palomares, M.; García-Nogales, A.; Rodríguez-Mansilla, J. Effects of physiotherapy vs. acupuncture in quality of life, pain, stiffness, difficulty to work and depression of women with fibromyalgia: A randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pérez-Bellmunt, A.; Casasayas-Cos, O.; López-de-Celis, C.; Rodríguez-Sanz, J.; Rodríguez-Jiménez, J.; Ortiz-Miguel, S.; Meca-Rivera, T.; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C. Effects of dry needling of latent trigger points on viscoelastic and muscular contractile properties: Preliminary results of a randomized within-participant clinical trial. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 3848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sánchez-Sánchez, J.L.; Calderón-Díez, L.; Herrero-Turrión, J.; Méndez-Sánchez, R.; Arias-Buría, J.L.; Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C. Changes in gene expression associated with collagen regeneration and remodeling of extracellular matrix after percutaneous electrolysis on collagenase-induced Achilles tendinopathy in an experimental animal model: A pilot study. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Folli, A.; Schneebeli, A.; Ballerini, S.; Mena, F.; Soldini, E.; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C.; Barbero, M. Enhancing trigger point dry needling safety by ultrasound skin-to-rib measurement: An inter-rater reliability study. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Botticchio, A.; Mourad, F.; Fernández-Carnero, S.; Arias-Buría, J.L.; Santodomingo Bueno, A.; Mesa Jiménez, J.; Gobbo, M. Short-Term morphological changes in asymptomatic perimandibular muscles after dry needling assessed with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: A proof-of-concept study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Navarro-Santana, M.J.; Sanchez-Infante, J.; Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C.; Cleland, J.A.; Martín-Casas, P.; Plaza-Manzano, G. Effectiveness of dry needling for myofascial trigger points associated with neck pain symptoms: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rahou-El-Bachiri, Y.; Navarro-Santana, M.J.; Gómez-Chiguano, G.F.; Cleland, J.A.; López-de-Uralde-Villanueva, I.; Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, C.; Ortega-Santiago, R.; Plaza-Manzano, G. Effects of trigger point dry needling for the management of knee pain syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Perreault, T.; Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C.; Cummings, M.; Gendron, B.C. Needling interventions for sciatica: Choosing methods based on neuropathic pain mechanisms—A scoping review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C.; Nijs, J. Trigger point dry needling for the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: Current perspectives within a pain neuroscience paradigm. J. Pain Res. 2019, 12, 1899–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C. Needling Interventions for the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain Syndromes. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4603. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194603

AMA Style

Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Needling Interventions for the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain Syndromes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(19):4603. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194603

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernández-de-las-Peñas, César. 2021. "Needling Interventions for the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain Syndromes" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 19: 4603. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194603

APA Style

Fernández-de-las-Peñas, C. (2021). Needling Interventions for the Management of Musculoskeletal Pain Syndromes. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(19), 4603. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194603

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop