1. Introduction
Liver fibrosis in subjects with chronic liver disease is a factor in bad prognosis for the development of liver cirrhosis and its consequent complications [
1]. The prevalence of fibrosis in the general population ranges from 3.6 to 5.8% according to the diagnostic method used [
2]. The main causes of liver fibrosis are alcohol intake, viral hepatopathies and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The latter is one of the most frequent liver diseases in our setting, affecting one fourth of the population with a prevalence that has shown to be exponentially increasing in the last years due to the rise in obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the metabolic syndrome (MetS) [
3]. At present, there are no antifibrotic treatments able to reverse or slow the progression of histological liver damage. It is essential to identify the risk factors associated with liver fibrosis in order to approach the disease from its initial or silent stages.
It has recently been suggested that thyroid hormones may influence the development of NAFLD and the progression of liver fibrosis [
4]. In some studies, hypothyroidism has been associated with NALFD independently of other factors [
5], however, this relationship was not found in a recently published study including a large number of subjects [
6]. On the other hand, the association between low thyroid function and liver fibrosis has also been studied, although this is still controversial [
7,
8]. The pathogenic mechanisms are not well defined but some common factors such as insulin resistance (IR), oxidative stress or MetS may be involved.
On the other hand, it has been suggested that low-normal thyroid function, that is, high thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) or lower thyroxine (T4) levels within the euthyroid range, could induce similar health effects similar to those observed in hypothyroid subjects [
9]. In a recent study including patients with NAFLD, low thyroid function, defined as TSH ≥ 2.5 μIU/mL, was independently associated with the presence of steatohepatitis and advanced fibrosis (F3–F4) in liver biopsy [
10].
Although the association between hypothyroidism, NAFLD and liver fibrosis has been studied, there are few studies on the impact of low-normal thyroid function within the euthyroid range on the pathogenesis of fibrosis. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the risk of liver fibrosis according to low-normal thyroid function in the general population.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Population
This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter population-based study. The participants included subjects from 18 to 75 years from 16 primary health care centers from the area of Barcelonès Nord and Maresme (Catalonia, Spain).
These subjects were randomly selected from the Primary Care Information System (Spanish ancronym SIAP) which is a populational database equivalent to the census in Catalonia. The exclusion criteria for the initial sample selection were: previously diagnosed chronic liver diseases, advanced severe diseases, cognitive impairment, institutionalized patients and death.
The study population was obtained from the follow-up of the populational cohort of 3014 subjects included in the recently published study by our group on the detection of liver diseases in the general population carried out from 2012 to 2016 [
2]. Of the total of 3014 subjects contacted, 1684 accepted to participate in the follow-up by telephone, representing 56% of the total. Each participant underwent a clinical interview, physical examination, blood analysis and transient elastography (TE). Data were collected from January 2017 to December 2019. For the analysis we excluded subjects with incomplete laboratory data (
n = 367), hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism (
n = 79), absence of or invalid elastography measurements (
n = 32) and alcohol risk intake (
n = 110) defined by a weekly alcohol intake ≥21 standard drink units (SDU) in men and ≥14 SDU in women. The final sample included was 1096 subjects.
The study protocol was approved by the IDIAP Jordi Gol Ethical Committee (P14/123) and was performed following the norms of the Declaration of Helsinki. All the subjects provided signed informed consent prior to inclusion, and the data were managed according to state legislation on data protection (LOPDGDD 3/2018).
2.2. Clinical and Laboratory Parameters
The following variables were collected: sociodemographic data: age and sex; anthropometric data: height, weight, waist circumference (WC) and the body mass index (BMI: weight in kg/height in m2); systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP); consumption of toxic substances: tobacco and alcohol in SDU; presence of comorbidities: arterial hypertension (AHT), hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, overweight and obesity, T2DM, MetS and NAFLD.
Blood analyses were performed after 12h of fasting and included the determination of: complete blood count, glycemia, glycosylated hemoglobin, total cholesterol, high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), triglycerides (TG); TSH, T4; alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma glutamyltransferase (GGT), alkaline phosphotase (ALP); total proteins and albumin.
2.3. Definitions
Euthyroidism was defined as TSH values between 0.35–4.94 μIU/mL and T4 1.7–1.48 μIU/mL, according to data from our reference laboratory. The subjects were classified into two groups for comparison: those presenting strict-normal thyroid function (TSH ≥ 0.35 μIU/mL and <2.5 μIU/mL; with normal T4 values) and those presenting low-normal thyroid function (TSH ≥ 2.5 μIU/mL and ≤4.94 μIU/mL; with normal T4 values).
MetS was diagnosed according to the criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program—Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATPIII) [
11], when the subjects presented 3 or more of its components: WC > 88 cm in women and > 102 cm in men; TG ≥ 150 mg/dl or on hypolipemiant treatment; HDL < 40 mg/dL in men and < 50 mg/dL in women or on hypolipemiant treatment; blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg or on hypotensive treatment; and basal glycemia ≥ 100 mg/dL or on hypolglycemia treatment.
The diagnosis of NAFLD was made using the fatty liver index (FLI) serological marker, according to B2 recommendations of the European guidelines [
12]. The FLI includes the variables of TG, BMI, GGT and WC and is calculated based on the following formula:
A FLI score ≥ 60 is diagnostic of NAFLD, while a FLI score of 30–60 is indeterminate, and a score < 30 indicates no NAFLD.
2.4. Evaluation of Liver Fibrosis
2.4.1. Transient Elastography (TE)
This was performed by a previously trained nurse using the Fibrosan 402 device (Echosens, París, France) equipped with an M probe, in all the study subjects. Subjects lacking 10 valid measurements and/or an interquartile range (IQR) of the measurement greater than 30% were excluded. Two cut-off points were established for the diagnosis of fibrosis according to the values of liver stiffness (LS) of ≥8.0 kilopascals (kPa) and ≥9.2 kPa (suggestive of significant liver fibrosis ≥F2) [
13].
2.4.2. Serological Markers
NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS): this score includes the variables of age, BMI, altered basal glycemia (ABG), AST, ALT, platelets and albumin and is calculated according to the following formula:
FIB-4: includes age, AST, ALT and platelets in the formula:
The aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI): includes AST, the upper limit of normality for AST and platelets using the formula:
The criteria for predicting liver fibrosis according to the serological markers [
13,
14] were: NFS > 0.675; FIB-4 > 3.25 and APRI > 1.5.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables are expressed as means and standard deviation, except for those that do not have a normal distribution, which are presented as medians and IQR. Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and percentages. The prevalences were calculated with their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
For the comparison of variables, two groups were established based on thyroid function: strict-normal and low-normal. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables, while the Student’s t test was used for continuous variables with a normal distribution and the Mann-Whitney test for variables expressed as medians.
The outcome variable was the presence of liver fibrosis defined by the LS values using two alternative cut-off points in the TE: ≥8.0 kPa and ≥9.2 kPa. In addition, an analytical criterion was used to define liver fibrosis, which was the presence of at least one altered serological marker (NFS, FIB-4 and APRI). To evaluate whether low-normal thyroid function was independently associated with liver fibrosis, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used adjusted for potential confounding factors. The corresponding odds ratios (OR) and their 95% CI were obtained.
All the statistical tests were performed with bilateral contrasts considering statistical significance with a p value < 0.05. The analyses were carried out with the Stata versión 15 package (Stata-Corp, College Station, TX, USA).
4. Discussion
The findings of the present study demonstrate that low-normal thyroid function is associated with a two-fold greater risk of liver fibrosis compared to strict-normal thyroid function. To our knowledge, this is the first European study to evalulate the risk of liver fibrosis in the general population according to thyroid function within the euthyroid range. Although these results are clinically relevant, the increase in the risk found was not independent of parameters of the MetS or the other factors studied.
It is well known that thyroid hormones participate in multiple processes of metabolism, such as lipolysis, neoglucogenesis as well as the regulation of weight and temperature. The effects of low thyroid function on health, specifically hypothyroidism, include a greater prevalence of obesity, dyslipemia, MetS and greater IR, which are determinant factors for the development of NAFLD [
15,
16,
17]. At a hepatic level, thyroid hormones are involved in beta oxidation of the fatty acids and could influence the accumulation of fat in the liver. The main thyroid hormone receptor (THR) expressed in the liver is THRβ and its role was demonstrated in a study designed with mice, where a dominant negative mutation in THRβ was analyzed and it was observed that these mice developed hepatic steatosis in a few months [
18]. Other physiopathological mechanisms involved in NAFLD/NASH such as the role of adipocytokines, oxidative stress reactions, mitochondrial dysfunction or lipid peroxidation have also been related to thyroid hormones [
19]. The activation of hepatic stellate cells is an important step in liver fibrogenesis [
20]. In case of liver injury, it has been suggested that inhibition of nuclear THR expression may activate hepatic stellate cells favoring the fibrogenic response [
19,
21].
Some studies have demonstrated results similar to those of our study, although few studies have evaluated the effect of low-normal thyroid function within the euthyroid range on liver fibrosis. Kim et al. [
10] demonstrated that subjects with NAFLD and low thyroid function, defined as TSH ≥ 2.5 μIU/mL, have a greater risk of developing non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and advanced fibrosis (stages F3–F4 in liver biopsy). Another study carried out in the general population, including 7259 participants, found an increase in the risk of advanced fibrosis defined by serological markers, which was 2-fold higher in subjects with low-normal thyroid function with respect to a group with strict-normal function independently of the WC, cholesterol values or IR [
22]. To the contrary, in our study there was no association between low-normal thyroid function and an alteration in serological markers of fibrosis.
The effects of thyroid hormones on liver fibrosis have also been studied. Specifically, TSH levels have been associated with LS values ≥ 8.0 kPa in patients with NAFLD diagnosed by FLI [
23]. We also found an increase in TSH values in euthyroid subjects with liver fibrosis as well as an excess of risk of LS ≥ 8.0 kPa, of 1.44 for each increase in TSH unit independently of the presence of obesity or MetS. On the other hand, Manka et al. found an association between low T3 levels and liver fibrosis (by TE or serological markers) but could not demonstrate the relationship between TSH and T4 levels with LS in subjects with NASH [
8].
One aspect of note in the present study, which excluded the main causes of chronic liver disease including alcohol risk intake, was that the prevalence of fibrosis found might be attributed to NAFLD in most of the cases. In fact, the prevalence of NAFLD in subjects with low-normal thyroid function was significantly greater, affecting almost half of these individuals.
Other authors have studied the role of thyroid hormones within the reference range in NAFLD. Low T4 levels have been associated with the risk of NAFLD in euthyroid subjects [
24], and in some studies this association was independent of the presence of MetS [
25]. On the other hand, high TSH levels have been related to NAFLD [
26,
27]. In a recent meta-analysis including 61,548 subjects, there was a significant increase in TSH values in subjects with NAFLD compared to a control group, with a weighted mean difference of 0.105 (95%CI 0.012–0.197), concluding that this could be a risk factor for the development and progression of NAFLD [
28]. In contrast, this association has not been demonstrated in other studies [
29].
According to the data available, low-normal thyroid function has been related to moderate increases in total cholesterol, LDL and TG values [
30]. Likewise, it has been linked to greater IR and an increase in the risk of MetS similar to what occurs in patients with hypothyroidism [
31,
32]. Elevated TSH levels, even within the reference range, have also been related to an increase in central obesity, among other alterations such as hyperglycemia, hyperuricemia, elevation in blood pressure, hypercoagulability or an increase in inflammatory markers [
33]. Thus, our study shows similar results with increases in the prevalence of obesity and MetS and elevations in TG levels in subjects with low-normal thyroid function. These findings are clinically important, since these factors may not only have implications in the cardiovascular system but may exacerbate the development of NAFLD and liver fibrosis given the common physiopathogenic mechanisms. In fact, in a study with a mean follow-up of 23 years, the univariate model demonstrated that low thyroid function (including low-normal euthyroidism and hypothyroidism) was associated with a greater risk of mortality in subjects with NAFLD [
34]. Taking all of this into account, some authors have suggested that the reference range of normality for thyroid function should be reevaluated.
The present study has some limitations. The cross-sectional design did not allow the determination of a relation of causality among the variations of thyroid function and liver fibrosis. The gold standard method for determining the grade of fibrosis is liver biopsy [
35], but since this is an invasive test it cannot be routinely performed. In our case, we used validated serological markers and measurements of LS by TE, which has a sensitivity of 95–98% [
36]. The XL probe is recommended for measuring LS in subjects with obesity, but in our study all the TE were performed with the M probe because it was the only probe available. Finally, thyroid hormones values may have undergone temporal modifications and the impact of this on the liver is unknown.