Next Article in Journal
Antithrombotic Management and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. Insights from CRAFT Trial
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of a Light-Emitting Diode Device for Neck Rejuvenation and Its Safety on Thyroid Glands
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Chronic Tinnitus in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Presbycusis

1
Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
2
Medical Research Center for Bioreaction to Reactive Oxygen Species and Biomedical Science Institute, School of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
3
Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(8), 1779; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081779
Submission received: 10 March 2021 / Revised: 5 April 2021 / Accepted: 16 April 2021 / Published: 19 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Brain, Hearing and Tinnitus Science)

Abstract

Introduction: The most frequent causes of tinnitus associated with hearing loss are noise-induced hearing loss and presbycusis. The mechanism of tinnitus is not yet clear, although several hypotheses have been suggested. Therefore, we aimed to analyze characteristics of chronic tinnitus between noise-induced hearing loss and presbycusis. Materials and Methods: This paper is a retrospective chart review and outpatient clinic-based study of 248 patients with chronic tinnitus from 2015 to 2020 with noise-induced or presbycusis. Pure tone audiometry (PTA), auditory brainstem response (ABR), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), and tinnitograms were conducted. Results: PTA showed that hearing thresholds at all frequencies were higher in patients with noise-induced hearing loss than the presbycusis group. ABR tests showed that patients with presbycusis had longer wave I and III latencies (p < 0.05 each) than patients with noise-induced hearing loss. TEOAE tests showed lower values in patients with noise-induced hearing loss than presbycusis at 1.5, 2, 3, and 4 kHz (p < 0.05 each). DPOAE tests showed that response rates in both ears at 1.5, 2, and 3 kHz were significantly higher in patients with presbycusis than noise-induced hearing loss (p < 0.05 each). Discussion: This study showed that hearing thresholds were higher, the loudness of tinnitus was smaller, and the degree of damage to outer hair cells was lower in patients with presbycusis than with noise-induced hearing loss. Moreover, wave I and III latencies were more prolonged in patients with presbycusis despite their having lower hearing thresholds. These phenomena may reflect the effects of aging or degeneration of the central nervous system with age. Further studies are needed to evaluate the etiologies of tinnitus.
Keywords: tinnitus; noise-induced hearing loss; presbycusis; audiology tinnitus; noise-induced hearing loss; presbycusis; audiology

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, H.J.; Kang, D.W.; Kim, S.S.; Oh, T.I.; Kim, S.H.; Yeo, S.G. Analysis of Chronic Tinnitus in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Presbycusis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081779

AMA Style

Kang HJ, Kang DW, Kim SS, Oh TI, Kim SH, Yeo SG. Analysis of Chronic Tinnitus in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Presbycusis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 10(8):1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081779

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Hee Jin, Dae Woong Kang, Sung Su Kim, Tong In Oh, Sang Hoon Kim, and Seung Geun Yeo. 2021. "Analysis of Chronic Tinnitus in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Presbycusis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 8: 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081779

APA Style

Kang, H. J., Kang, D. W., Kim, S. S., Oh, T. I., Kim, S. H., & Yeo, S. G. (2021). Analysis of Chronic Tinnitus in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss and Presbycusis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(8), 1779. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081779

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop