Next Article in Journal
Natural Language Processing for Information Extraction of Gastric Diseases and Its Application in Large-Scale Clinical Research
Next Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness of Topical Ganciclovir 2% Monotherapy Versus Combined Steroid Therapy in Cytomegalovirus Endotheliitis
Previous Article in Journal
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study on hzVSF-v13, a Novel Anti-Vimentin Monoclonal Antibody Drug as Add-on Standard of Care in the Management of Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID-19
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Changing Medical Paradigm on Inflammatory Eye Disease: Technology and Its Implications for P4 Medicine

by
Takenori Inomata
1,2,3,* and
Jaemyoung Sung
1,4
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
2
Department of Digital Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
3
AI Incubation Farm, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
4
Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(11), 2964; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11112964
Submission received: 13 May 2022 / Accepted: 23 May 2022 / Published: 24 May 2022
Society 5.0 is a novel societal concept proposed by the Japanese government during the 5th Science, Technology, and Innovation Basic Plan [1,2]. Through integrating the physical space and cyberspace, it aims to concurrently promote economic advancements and resolve social problems. Such societal vision inevitably requires a paradigm shift in the field of medicine, calling for the incorporation of comprehensive digital forms of medical big data into clinical practice. Personalized medical information, such as subjective symptoms, biometrics, lifestyle pattern, and environmental information, may be extracted from IoMT (Internet of Medical Things) or sensors attached to commonplace smart devices, which is gaining traction for its potential to add value in healthcare. In addition, community-wide medical and billing data from electronic medical records may add epidemiological insights, and, conversely, genomics or multiomics data may provide multidimensional, molecular-level details on one’s dynamic physiology. With a robust dataset and recent advancements in the information and technology sector, it is becoming increasingly feasible to rapidly analyze medical big data through artificial intelligence (AI) analysis, which appears to have strong implications in adopting core values of P4 (predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory) medicine in future healthcare [2,3]. In this new paradigm, medical big data and its analysis could bring a more accurate community and global health profile, which will lay foundations for a better and tailored predictive models, diagnostic standards, and intervention choices [4]. Furthermore, the digitization of medicine could shift the traditional facility-based, ex-post facto care infrastructure to one that operates within one’s daily life with an emphasis on patient-centered predictive and longitudinal medicine [2,5].
As the aging society and digitalization progresses in the modern era, visual function has become increasingly critical for one’s quality of life (QOL) [6,7]. The eye is one of the few organs that possessed immune privilege to control excessive inflammation and to maintain homeostasis [8,9,10]. Reversely, however, eye tissue frequently experiences irreversible, detrimental visual impairment if such inflammatory changes are to occur [11]. Examples include autoimmune uveitis, keratitis, dry eye disease (DED), allergic conjunctivitis, and corneal allograft rejection, all of which may cause longstanding damage to one’s quality of vision and QOL. The effects of inflammation are often critical in corneal endothelial cells that maintain corneal transparency and in retinal photoreceptor cells, as they do not regenerate in vivo [12,13]. T-cell mediated immune responses play a central role in DED [14], the most prevalent ocular surface disease. However, current mainstay treatment revolves around preventing exacerbations and symptomatic management with minimal routes to reverse the disease course [15,16]. Corneal allograft rejection is also a frequently encountered inflammatory process. Albeit with great response to existing treatment with corticosteroids and immunomodulators [17], the regimen pathway remains singular due to limited pharmacological targets and individualized strategies. With failed management, the only option is repeated corneal transplantation, and rejection rates only increase with repeated, high-risk corneal transplantation to the graft bed [18]. Although their pathophysiology is mainly cell death-driven, inflammatory mediators are increasingly thought to play an important role in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) [19] and other forms of hereditary retinal dystrophies, all of which still do not have a curative option [20]. As numerous ocular diseases involve inflammatory changes to a significant degree, a better understanding of the inflammatory dynamics at a personal level may have strong implications for the prevention of permanent visual impairment and decreased QOL for a wide population.
In the context of any inflammatory disease pathogenesis, a disease rarely develops as a dichotomy of present or absent disease state. Instead, it presents as a disease spectrum with various factors, leading to phenotypes that ranges from subclinical to severe stages [21,22,23]. DED is a highly multifactorial disease, characterized by three major categories of risk factors: environmental, lifestyle, and host factors [21,24,25]. Specific factors include humidity, pollen status, particulate matter 2.5, diet, tobacco use, physical activity, contact lens use, age, sex, and family history, all of which can affect one’s susceptibility, severity, and prognosis. Its presentation varies amongst individuals, often with highly heterogenous sets of symptoms, including eye dryness, decreased visual acuity, eye strain, photophobia, and depressive mood symptoms [25,26,27]. However, despite understanding the complexity of DED pathophysiology, current treatment standards for DED are hardly tailored to target specific factors and maximize treatment efficacy [28,29]. In overcoming this hurdle in pursuing treatment optimization, the healthcare system must first gain a holistic insight into one’s health through understanding their symptoms and related lifestyle data, as well as a disease stratification strategy based on this information to optimize management plans for individuals [26,30,31].
Recently, the field of cross-hierarchical integrative data-driven biological research has received attention owing to the development of medical big data and AI technologies [2,30,31,32]. Such analyses may have implications for elucidating various pathophysiology as they encompass all levels of cellular function from intracellular molecular dynamics to end phenotypes [18,28]. The IoMT and the expanding landscape of biomedical big data allows for the integration of multiomics, patient reported outcomes (PROs) [33], and real-time inputs from now-commonplace sensors attached to mobile devices [29,34,35,36]. A multilevel understanding of a disease pathophysiology could unveil various biomarkers and pharmaceutical targets, possibly enabling targeted medical management for specific ocular inflammatory mediators. Since the discovery of the relatively novel LFA-1 antagonist approved for DED therapy [37], various targets of the T-cell mediated inflammatory cascade have emerged as possible pharmacological targets, including Th17, Th1, TSP-1, and LXA4 [14]. Notably, the shift towards integrative research is particularly promising for hereditary diseases with the involvement of numerous genes such as RP, as its disease process involves a complex cascade of retinal degeneration, oxidative stress, cellular calcium homeostasis, and microglial inflammatory activity [38].
Through proposed changes in Society 5.0 and adoption of mobile health (mHealth) principles, providers and researchers may be able to deduce certain ocular inflammatory dynamics at an individual level with correlating digital phenotypes [39] (i.e., ePROs, sensor data, on-screen time, blink pattern recognition) [5]. Various mHealth-driven approach to gain personalized data have gone underway with significant findings, particularly in chronic disease and mood disorder management [36,40,41]. This expansion of perspective helped elucidate new aspects of pathophysiology, disease course, biomarkers, and disease subgroups [26,30,31], laying ground for tailored therapeutic targets for highly diverse and heterogenous diseases, including various immune-mediated ocular disorders. Additionally, one of the most significant changes to standard care would be the transition away from the traditional facility-oriented care, to one that can provide healthcare within one’s daily life, which may have implications in inflammatory diseases that often require long-term management. The global shift towards digital and physical space integration may allow for non-intrusive longitudinal care, as well as create new value to medicine through truly bringing values of P4 medicine to healthcare.

Conclusions

Ocular inflammatory diseases are highly multifactorial and heterogenous in its presentation. With the proposed paradigm shift in healthcare under Society 5.0, a hierarchical, cross-sectional analytic approach of medical big data may help elucidate pathophysiology, novel biomarkers, preventative strategies, and new pharmacological agents for complex immune-mediated diseases. These innovations should lay foundations in realizing P4 medicine, guiding healthcare towards patient-centered care.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grand Numbers 20K09810 (TI) and 20KK0207 (TI).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Society 5.0. Available online: https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/society5_0/ (accessed on 7 May 2022).
  2. Inomata, T.; Sung, J.; Nakamura, M.; Iwagami, M.; Okumura, Y.; Fujio, K.; Akasaki, Y.; Fujimoto, K.; Yanagawa, A.; Midorikawa-Inomata, A.; et al. Cross-hierarchical Integrative Research Network for Heterogenetic Eye Disease Toward P4 Medicine: A Narrative Review. Juntendo Med. J. 2021, 67, 519–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hood, L.; Friend, S.H. Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (P4) cancer medicine. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol 2011, 8, 184–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, C.H.; Yoon, H.J. Medical big data: Promise and challenges. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 2017, 36, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Okumura, Y.; Inomata, T.; Midorikawa-Inomata, A.; Sung, J.; Fujio, K.; Akasaki, Y.; Nakamura, M.; Iwagami, M.; Fujimoto, K.; Eguchi, A.; et al. DryEyeRhythm: A reliable and valid smartphone application for the diagnosis assistance of dry eye. Ocul. Surf. 2022, 25, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weih, L.M.; Hassell, J.B.; Keeffe, J. Assessment of the impact of vision impairment. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002, 43, 927–935. [Google Scholar]
  7. Eguchi, A.; Inomata, T.; Nakamura, M.; Nagino, K.; Iwagami, M.; Sung, J.; Midorikawa-Inomata, A.; Okumura, Y.; Fujio, K.; Fujimoto, K.; et al. Heterogeneity of eye drop use among symptomatic dry eye individuals in Japan: Large-scale crowdsourced research using DryEyeRhythm application. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 65, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hori, J.; Yamaguchi, T.; Keino, H.; Hamrah, P.; Maruyama, K. Immune privilege in corneal transplantation. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2019, 72, 100758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Inomata, T.; Hua, J.; Di Zazzo, A.; Dana, R. Impaired Function of Peripherally Induced Regulatory T Cells in Hosts at High Risk of Graft Rejection. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hua, J.; Inomata, T.; Chen, Y.; Foulsham, W.; Stevenson, W.; Shiang, T.; Bluestone, J.A.; Dana, R. Pathological conversion of regulatory T cells is associated with loss of allotolerance. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Inomata, T.; Mashaghi, A.; Di Zazzo, A.; Lee, S.M.; Chiang, H.; Dana, R. Kinetics of Angiogenic Responses in Corneal Transplantation. Cornea 2017, 36, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dana, M.R.; Qian, Y.; Hamrah, P. Twenty-five-year panorama of corneal immunology: Emerging concepts in the immunopathogenesis of microbial keratitis, peripheral ulcerative keratitis, and corneal transplant rejection. Cornea 2000, 19, 625–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sene, A.; Apte, R.S. Inflammation-Induced Photoreceptor Cell Death. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2018, 1074, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mason, L.; Jafri, S.; Dortonne, I.; Sheppard, J.D., Jr. Emerging therapies for dry eye disease. Expert Opin. Emerg. Drugs 2021, 26, 401–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Marshall, L.L.; Roach, J.M. Treatment of Dry Eye Disease. Consult. Pharm. 2016, 31, 96–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gupta, P.K.; Asbell, P.; Sheppard, J. Current and Future Pharmacological Therapies for the Management of Dry Eye. Eye Contact Lens 2020, 46 (Suppl. 2), S64–S69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bersudsky, V.; Blum-Hareuveni, T.; Rehany, U.; Rumelt, S. The profile of repeated corneal transplantation. Ophthalmology 2001, 108, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Di Zazzo, A.; Lee, S.M.; Sung, J.; Niutta, M.; Coassin, M.; Mashaghi, A.; Inomata, T. Variable Responses to Corneal Grafts: Insights from Immunology and Systems Biology. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Noailles, A.; Maneu, V.; Campello, L.; Gómez-Vicente, V.; Lax, P.; Cuenca, N. Persistent inflammatory state after photoreceptor loss in an animal model of retinal degeneration. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 33356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Olivares-González, L.; Velasco, S.; Campillo, I.; Rodrigo, R. Retinal Inflammation, Cell Death and Inherited Retinal Dystrophies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stapleton, F.; Alves, M.; Bunya, V.Y.; Jalbert, I.; Lekhanont, K.; Malet, F.; Na, K.S.; Schaumberg, D.; Uchino, M.; Vehof, J.; et al. TFOS DEWS II Epidemiology Report. Ocul. Surf. 2017, 15, 334–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhu, J.; Inomata, T.; Di Zazzo, A.; Kitazawa, K.; Okumura, Y.; Coassin, M.; Surico, P.L.; Fujio, K.; Yanagawa, A.; Miura, M.; et al. Role of Immune Cell Diversity and Heterogeneity in Corneal Graft Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Inomata, T.; Nakamura, M.; Iwagami, M.; Sung, J.; Nakamura, M.; Ebihara, N.; Fujisawa, K.; Muto, K.; Nojiri, S.; Ide, T.; et al. Individual characteristics and associated factors of hay fever: A large-scale mHealth study using AllerSearch. Allergol. Int. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Inomata, T.; Nakamura, M.; Iwagami, M.; Shiang, T.; Yoshimura, Y.; Fujimoto, K.; Okumura, Y.; Eguchi, A.; Iwata, N.; Miura, M.; et al. Risk Factors for Severe Dry Eye Disease: Crowdsourced Research Using DryEyeRhythm. Ophthalmology 2019, 126, 766–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Inomata, T.; Iwagami, M.; Nakamura, M.; Shiang, T.; Yoshimura, Y.; Fujimoto, K.; Okumura, Y.; Eguchi, A.; Iwata, N.; Miura, M.; et al. Characteristics and Risk Factors Associated With Diagnosed and Undiagnosed Symptomatic Dry Eye Using a Smartphone Application. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020, 138, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Inomata, T.; Nakamura, M.; Iwagami, M.; Midorikawa-Inomata, A.; Sung, J.; Fujimoto, K.; Okumura, Y.; Eguchi, A.; Iwata, N.; Miura, M.; et al. Stratification of Individual Symptoms of Contact Lens-Associated Dry Eye Using the iPhone App DryEyeRhythm: Crowdsourced Cross-Sectional Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e18996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Inomata, T.; Iwagami, M.; Nakamura, M.; Shiang, T.; Fujimoto, K.; Okumura, Y.; Iwata, N.; Fujio, K.; Hiratsuka, Y.; Hori, S.; et al. Association between dry eye and depressive symptoms: Large-scale crowdsourced research using the DryEyeRhythm iPhone application. Ocul. Surf. 2020, 18, 312–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Inomata, T.; Sung, J.; Nakamura, M.; Iwagami, M.; Okumura, Y.; Iwata, N.; Midorikawa-Inomata, A.; Fujimoto, K.; Eguchi, A.; Nagino, K.; et al. Using Medical Big Data to Develop Personalized Medicine for Dry Eye Disease. Cornea 2020, 39 (Suppl. 1), S39–S46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Inomata, T.; Sung, J.; Nakamura, M.; Fujisawa, K.; Muto, K.; Ebihara, N.; Iwagami, M.; Nakamura, M.; Fujio, K.; Okumura, Y.; et al. New medical big data for P4 medicine on allergic conjunctivitis. Allergol. Int. 2020, 69, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Inomata, T.; Nakamura, M.; Sung, J.; Midorikawa-Inomata, A.; Iwagami, M.; Fujio, K.; Akasaki, Y.; Okumura, Y.; Fujimoto, K.; Eguchi, A.; et al. Smartphone-based digital phenotyping for dry eye toward P4 medicine: A crowdsourced cross-sectional study. NPJ Digit. Med. 2021, 4, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Inomata, T.; Nakamura, M.; Iwagami, M.; Sung, J.; Nakamura, M.; Ebihara, N.; Fujisawa, K.; Muto, K.; Nojiri, S.; Ide, T.; et al. Symptom-based stratification for hay fever: A crowdsourced study using the smartphone application AllerSearch. Allergy 2021, 76, 3820–3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhu, J.; Inomata, T.; Nakamura, M.; Fujimoto, K.; Akasaki, Y.; Fujio, K.; Yanagawa, A.; Uchida, K.; Sung, J.; Negishi, N.; et al. Anti-CD80/86 antibodies inhibit inflammatory reaction and improve graft survival in a high-risk murine corneal transplantation rejection model. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Okumura, Y.; Inomata, T.; Iwata, N.; Sung, J.; Fujimoto, K.; Fujio, K.; Midorikawa-Inomata, A.; Miura, M.; Akasaki, Y.; Murakami, A. A Review of Dry Eye Questionnaires: Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Haghi, M.; Thurow, K.; Stoll, R. Wearable Devices in Medical Internet of Things: Scientific Research and Commercially Available Devices. Healthc. Inf. Res. 2017, 23, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jain, S.; Nehra, M.; Kumar, R.; Dilbaghi, N.; Hu, T.; Kumar, S.; Kaushik, A.; Li, C.Z. Internet of medical things (IoMT)-integrated biosensors for point-of-care testing of infectious diseases. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 179, 113074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Basatneh, R.; Najafi, B.; Armstrong, D.G. Health Sensors, Smart Home Devices, and the Internet of Medical Things: An Opportunity for Dramatic Improvement in Care for the Lower Extremity Complications of Diabetes. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2018, 12, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abidi, A.; Shukla, P.; Ahmad, A. Lifitegrast: A novel drug for treatment of dry eye disease. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2016, 7, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Campochiaro, P.A.; Mir, T.A. The mechanism of cone cell death in Retinitis Pigmentosa. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2018, 62, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Insel, T.R. Digital Phenotyping: Technology for a New Science of Behavior. Jama 2017, 318, 1215–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Miller, J.D.; Najafi, B.; Armstrong, D.G. Current Standards and Advances in Diabetic Ulcer Prevention and Elderly Fall Prevention Using Wearable Technology. Curr. Geriatr. Rep. 2015, 4, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Molloy, A.; Anderson, P.L. Engagement with mobile health interventions for depression: A systematic review. Internet Interv. 2021, 26, 100454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Inomata, T.; Sung, J. Changing Medical Paradigm on Inflammatory Eye Disease: Technology and Its Implications for P4 Medicine. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11112964

AMA Style

Inomata T, Sung J. Changing Medical Paradigm on Inflammatory Eye Disease: Technology and Its Implications for P4 Medicine. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(11):2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11112964

Chicago/Turabian Style

Inomata, Takenori, and Jaemyoung Sung. 2022. "Changing Medical Paradigm on Inflammatory Eye Disease: Technology and Its Implications for P4 Medicine" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 11: 2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11112964

APA Style

Inomata, T., & Sung, J. (2022). Changing Medical Paradigm on Inflammatory Eye Disease: Technology and Its Implications for P4 Medicine. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(11), 2964. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11112964

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop