Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Withdrawn vs. Agitated Relatives during Resuscitation on Team Workload: A Single-Center Randomised Simulation-Based Study
Previous Article in Journal
Vertebral Body Tethering in 49 Adolescent Patients after Peak Height Velocity for the Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis: 2–5 Year Follow-Up
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cataract Surgery in Very Old Patients: A Case-Control Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advancements in Postoperative Care after Cataract Surgery

by
Piotr Kanclerz
1,2,* and
Raimo Tuuminen
1,3,*
1
Helsinki Retina Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
2
Hygeia Clinic, 80-286 Gdańsk, Poland
3
Department of Ophthalmology, Kymenlaakso Central Hospital, 48210 Kotka, Finland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(11), 3162; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113162
Submission received: 25 May 2022 / Accepted: 29 May 2022 / Published: 2 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cataract Surgery and Postoperative Care)
Cataract surgery is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in many countries. The procedure itself is considered safe and efficient with good visual outcomes, and the development of modern surgical techniques and technologies has considerably reduced the frequency of complications. With increased life expectancy, cataract surgery is becoming more common, even among very old patients. As shown in the article by Nussinovitch et al., cataract surgery in very old patients may demand more experienced surgeons due to higher nuclear density and the rates of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome [1]. This is of utmost importance, as one of our earlier studies has shown that, at one of the timepoints, the prevalence of capsular bag complications in a general population undergoing cataract surgery is 7.03% for resident surgeons and only 0.36% for senior surgeons [2]. Elderly patients are also at risk of ocular surface conditions including blepharitis, which is the most frequent cause of cataract surgery cancellation since it might be a primary risk factor for endophthalmitis [3]. The article by Nowomiejska et al. extensively analyzed the prevalence of ocular demodicosis and ocular surface conditions in patients selected for cataract surgery [4].
Currently, the refractive outcomes of cataract surgery have enabled the use of the procedure for refractive lens exchange. The standard deviation of the new-generation intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas in patients undergoing cataract surgery is less than 0.4 D [5], which translates into more than 80% of eyes within 0.5 D target refraction [6]. A single study has even reported ≥88% of eyes within 0.5 D target refraction [7]. An excellent refractive outcome is particularly important due to the constantly growing popularity for spectacle-independence with non-toric and toric premium IOLs. Multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) are used more commonly, to a considerable extent for refractive purposes in non-cataractous eyes [8]. Clear lens exchange and MIOL implantation significantly improve health-related quality of life and vision-related quality of life compared to spectacles in a 1-year follow-up [9,10]. These advancements yielding precise postoperative refractive results have raised patients’ expectations for excellent uncorrected distance visual acuity.
Complications are still a substantial burden because of the sheer number of cataract surgeries performed worldwide each year. Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME; Irvine–Gass syndrome) is one of the most common causes of visual impairment after cataract surgery. PCME may occur even in the absence of complications and risk factors. Intraoperative complications, including capsule rupture, vitreous loss, and iris trauma are associated with a higher risk for PCME [11]. Other risk factors include uveitis, poor glycemic control of diabetes [12], and various posterior segment diseases. Currently, there is no common definition for PCME, and therefore, the incidences vary greatly among previously published studies [11]. In the study by Aaronson et al., which was published in this issue, the total incidence of PCME among 536 eyes was 3.5% [13]. Several pre- and postsurgical medical interventions are employed in order to minimize postoperative inflammation and the risk of developing PCME, and these have been a topic of discussion for several years [14]. The results of our previous study have shown findings favoring postoperative topical diclofenac instead of dexamethasone as the first-line postoperative medication after cataract surgery in preventing PCME and suggested reserving dexamethasone as a combination therapy for patients with the highest risk of postoperative complications [14]. Other points of interest when comparing different topical drugs have been the speed of visual recovery and drug tolerability [15]. Importantly, in most cases, PCME is self-limiting using topical nepafenac without any further need for intravitreal treatment. In the study by Aaronson et al., only 1 of the 19 eyes showed no macular edema resolution within two months after topical nepafenac administration [13].
Outcomes of phacoemulsification cataract surgery depend largely on surgeon skills, as well as adherence to a complicated multidrug regimen of anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial therapy [16]. The successful administration of this regimen can be restricted by noncompliance, difficulties in administering eye drops, bioavailability, or side effects. Eliminating the need for eye drop medications in the perioperative period could potentially improve both performance and safety, while also improving patient satisfaction with surgery. Currently, two sustained-release formulations of dexamethasone are available on some markets; the potential options include placement of an anterior chamber suspension in the anterior chamber (Dexycu; Eye-Point Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, MA, USA) or an extended-release intracanalicular insert (Dextenza, OcularTherapeutix, Bedford, MA, USA) [17]. As the introduction of intracameral antibiotics has brought benefits to cataract surgery, intraocular dexamethasone suspension for anterior chamber steroid placement might also assist in improving surgical outcomes.
Another significant late complication of cataract surgery is posterior capsular opacification (PCO), which is associated with the proliferation and migration of lens epithelial cells [18]. The risk factors for PCO are well known and can be classified as related to the systemic or eye diseases of the patient, to the surgical procedure or to the IOL design [19]. Interventions which have been employed for preventing PCO include modifications in IOL design, the implantation of additional devices and pharmacologic therapy [20]. Sharp posterior optic edges are preferred to round-edged IOLs of the same material for the reduction in PCO and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates [21]. It is well recognized that although hydrophilic acrylic material is more biocompatible, IOLs made of this material have been shown to support lens epithelial cell adhesion, migration and proliferation and thus PCO development is compared with IOLs made of PMMA or hydrophobic acrylic materials [22,23,24]. A recent economic analysis has highlighted that the choice of IOL for cataract surgery, as a direct consequence of lower Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rates, may translate into significant savings both financially and with respect to resource allocation for governmental hospitals and the tax-financed national healthcare system [18]. The study by Lindholm et al. has shown that low-diopter IOLs, which are used in myopic patients, are associated with significantly higher risk of Nd:YAG capsulotomy within five years following implantation [25]. Postoperative treatment with steroids among patients undergoing uncomplicated cataract surgery is also associated with lower rates of clinically significant PCO rated compared to treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [20]. Further studies in this field are warranted and shall potentially further improve the outcomes of cataract surgery.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have neither proprietary nor commercial interests in any medications or materials discussed in this study. Kanclerz reports grants from Alcon and non-financial support from Visim and Optopol Technologies outside the submitted work. Tuuminen is a scientific adviser (advisory board, honoraria) to Alcon Laboratories, Inc.; Allergan, Inc.; Bayer AG and Novartis AG and has received clinical trial support (study medicines) from Bayer AG and Laboratoires Théa outside the submitted work.

References

  1. Nussinovitch, H.; Tsumi, E.; Tuuminen, R.; Malyugin, B.; Lior, Y.; Naidorf Rosenblatt, H.; Boyko, M.; Achiron, A.; Knyazer, B. Cataract Surgery in Very Old Patients: A Case-Control Study. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2021, 10, 4658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Aaronson, A.; Viljanen, A.; Kanclerz, P.; Grzybowski, A.; Tuuminen, R. Cataract Complications Study: An Analysis of Adverse Effects among 14,520 Eyes in Relation to Surgical Experience. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Afsharkhamseh, N.; Movahedan, A.; Motahari, H.; Djalilian, A.R. Cataract Surgery in Patients with Ocular Surface Disease: An Update in Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment. Saudi J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 28, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Nowomiejska, K.; Lukasik, P.; Brzozowska, A.; Toro, M.D.; Sedzikowska, A.; Bartosik, K.; Rejdak, R. Prevalence of Ocular Demodicosis and Ocular Surface Conditions in Patients Selected for Cataract Surgery. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2020, 9, 3069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Melles, R.B.; Holladay, J.T.; Chang, W.J. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas. Ophthalmology 2018, 125, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Savini, G.; Taroni, L.; Hoffer, K.J. Recent Developments in Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods-Update 2020. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020, 8, 1553. [Google Scholar]
  7. Savini, G.; Hoffer, K.J.; Balducci, N.; Barboni, P.; Schiano-Lomoriello, D. Comparison of Formula Accuracy for Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Based on Measurements by a Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Optical Biometer. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2020, 46, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mandelblum, J.; Fischer, N.; Achiron, A.; Goldberg, M.; Tuuminen, R.; Zunz, E.; Spierer, O. A Simple Pre-Operative Nuclear Classification Score (SPONCS) for Grading Cataract Hardness in Clinical Studies. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2020, 9, 3503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Grzybowski, A.; Kanclerz, P.; Tuuminen, R. Multifocal Intraocular Lenses and Retinal Diseases. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020, 258, 805–813. [Google Scholar]
  10. Viljanen, A.; Koskela, K.; Koskela, H.; Tuuminen, R.; Uusitalo, H. One-Year Results of Health-Related and Vision-Related Quality of Life After Clear Lens Extraction and Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 227, 240–244. [Google Scholar]
  11. Grzybowski, A.; Kanclerz, P. The Role of Steroids and NSAIDs in Prevention and Treatment of Postsurgical Cystoid Macular Edema. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 4896–4902. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Grzybowski, A.; Kanclerz, P.; Huerva, V.; Ascaso, F.J.; Tuuminen, R. Diabetes and Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery: Difficulties, Risks and Potential Complications. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2019, 8, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Aaronson, A.; Achiron, A.; Tuuminen, R. Clinical Course of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema Treated with Nepafenac. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2020, 9, 3034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ylinen, P.; Holmström, E.; Laine, I.; Lindholm, J.-M.; Tuuminen, R. Anti-Inflammatory Medication Following Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Trial between Preservative-Free Dexamethasone, Diclofenac and Their Combination. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Ylinen, P.; Taipale, C.; Lindholm, J.-M.; Laine, I.; Holmström, E.; Tuuminen, R. Postoperative Management in Cataract Surgery: Nepafenac and Preservative-Free Diclofenac Compared. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018, 96, 853–859. [Google Scholar]
  16. Assil, K.K.; Greenwood, M.D.; Gibson, A.; Vantipalli, S.; Metzinger, J.L.; Goldstein, M.H. Dropless Cataract Surgery: Modernizing Perioperative Medical Therapy to Improve Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2021, 32 (Suppl. 1), S1–S12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Grzybowski, A.; Brockmann, T.; Kanclerz, P.; Pleyer, U. Dexamethasone Intraocular Suspension: A Long-Acting Therapeutic for Treating Inflammation Associated with Cataract Surgery. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 35, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aaronson, A.; Grzybowski, A.; Tuuminen, R. The Health Economic Impact of Posterior Capsule Opacification in Finland Comparing the Two Single-Piece Intraocular Lenses: A Cost-Consequence Analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019, 97, e1152–e1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lindholm, J.-M.; Laine, I.; Tuuminen, R. Five-Year Cumulative Incidence and Risk Factors of Nd:YAG Capsulotomy in 10 044 Hydrophobic Acrylic 1-Piece and 3-Piece Intraocular Lenses. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 200, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hecht, I.; Karesvuo, P.; Achiron, A.; Elbaz, U.; Laine, I.; Tuuminen, R. Anti-Inflammatory Medication After Cataract Surgery and Posterior Capsular Opacification. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 215, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Buehl, W.; Findl, O. Effect of Intraocular Lens Design on Posterior Capsule Opacification. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 2008, 34, 1976–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Awasthi, N.; Guo, S.; Wagner, B.J. Posterior Capsular Opacification: A Problem Reduced but Not yet Eradicated. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2009, 127, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kanclerz, P.; Yildirim, T.M.; Khoramnia, R. A Review of Late Intraocular Lens Opacifications. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2021, 32, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kanclerz, P.; Yildirim, T.M.; Khoramnia, R. Microscopic Characteristics of Late Intraocular Lens Opacifications. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2021, 145, 759–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lindholm, J.-M.; Laine, I.; Tuuminen, R. Intraocular Lens Power, Myopia, and the Risk of Nd:YAG Capsulotomy after 15,375 Cataract Surgeries. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2020, 9, 3071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kanclerz, P.; Tuuminen, R. Advancements in Postoperative Care after Cataract Surgery. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113162

AMA Style

Kanclerz P, Tuuminen R. Advancements in Postoperative Care after Cataract Surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(11):3162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113162

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kanclerz, Piotr, and Raimo Tuuminen. 2022. "Advancements in Postoperative Care after Cataract Surgery" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 11: 3162. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113162

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop