Next Article in Journal
Lower-Neck Sparing Using Proton Therapy in Patients with Uninvolved Neck Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Is It Safe?
Previous Article in Journal
Human Amniotic Suspension Allograft Improves Pain and Function in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Not Randomized Clinical Pilot Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/jcm11123296
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Affective Dimension of Pain Appears to Be Determinant within a Pain–Insomnia–Anxiety Pathological Loop in Fibromyalgia: A Case-Control Study

by
Lliure-Naima Mory
1,2,
Daniel de Oliveira Fernandes
1,
Christian Mancini
1,
Michael Mouthon
1 and
Joelle Nsimire Chabwine
1,2,*
1
Neurology Unit, Medicine Section, Department of Neuroscience and Movement Science, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
2
Division of Neurorehabilitation, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3296; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123296
Submission received: 3 May 2022 / Revised: 1 June 2022 / Accepted: 7 June 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Neurology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain disease characterized by multiple symptoms whose interactions and implications in the disease pathology are still unclear. This study aimed at investigating how pain, sleep, and mood disorders influence each other in FM, while discriminating between the sensory and affective pain dimensions. Methods: Sixteen female FM patients were evaluated regarding their pain, while they underwent—along with 11 healthy sex- and age-adjusted controls—assessment of mood and sleep disorders. Analysis of variance and correlations were performed in order to assess group differences and investigate the interactions between pain, mood, and sleep descriptors. Results: FM patients reported the typical widespread pain, with similar sensory and affective inputs. Contrary to controls, they displayed moderate anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Affective pain (but neither the sensory pain nor pain intensity) was the only pain indicator that tendentially correlated with anxiety and insomnia, which were mutually associated. An affective pain–insomnia–anxiety loop was thus completed. High ongoing pain strengthened this vicious circle, to which it included depression and sensory pain. Conclusions: Discriminating between the sensory and affective pain components in FM patients disclosed a pathological loop, with a key role of affective pain; high ongoing pain acted as an amplifier of symptoms interaction. This unraveled the interplay between three of most cardinal FM symptoms; these results contribute to better understand FM determinants and pathology and could help in orienting therapeutic strategies.

1. Introduction

Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by a constellation of symptoms including mainly chronic widespread pain, sleep disorders, fatigue, mood dysfunction, and cognitive impairment [1,2]. This highly disabling disease is prevalent in the general population (0.2–6.6%) and predominates among women [3]. It is unclear whether nonpain FM cardinal symptoms (e.g., mood and sleep disorders) intrinsically participate in the disease’s pathological processes or simply act as comorbidities. Furthermore, how their mutual negative influence on one another could contribute to the disease pathology has yet to be enlightened.
Sleep disorders are present in ~90% of FM patients [4,5,6] and are closely associated with chronic pain. People suffering from insomnia witness, similar to healthy individuals under sleep deprivation [7,8], lower pain thresholds [9] and myalgia (recalling FM symptoms), while chronic pain gives rise to sleep disturbances [10]. Hence, this bidirectional relation between chronic pain (including in FM) and sleep disorders creates a vicious circle [4,11]. However, it is not established whether there could be a predominant direction in this relationship [12,13]. On the other hand, in FM patients, sleep disorders seem to be related to mood dysfunction (anxiety in particular), in addition to other symptoms such as memory and concentration difficulties [6]. Furthermore, prevalent anxiety (60%) and depression (20–80%) in FM [14] are associated with pain severity [15,16,17]. Thus, from a purely clinical perspective, chronic pain, mood, and sleep disorders seem to be all associated one with another, while the primum movens, as well as the preferential direction within these intricated associations, remain unclear owing to contradictory observations [18,19].
Although the etiology and pathological mechanisms of FM are unknown, the abovementioned multiple interactions between pain, sleep, and mood disorders could relate to FM-induced central nervous system aberrant functioning. Indeed, brain areas and neurotransmitter pathways involved in pain, sleep, and mood disorders overlap [20,21,22]. Thus, a better understanding of the complex interplay between these symptoms would not only give new insights into elucidating pathological processes engaged in FM but would also further enlighten underlying neurophysiological and structural mechanisms.
Difficulties understanding the interplay between pain, mood, and sleep disorders in FM might be due to the multiple dimensions of pain, making it difficult to linearly establish a relationship with other symptoms. In fact, most studies solely evaluate pain intensity [23], while a better approach would consist, for example, in differentiating between the sensory and the affective components of pain [24,25]. The sensory-discriminative dimension refers to the spatiotemporal aspects and the quality of pain, while the affective dimension states the unpleasantness and motivating behaviors such as avoidance or escape. These two pain modalities are believed to be partially independent one from another [26,27], while their relationship with pain intensity is not clearly studied. Neuroanatomically, brain areas involved in cognitive–emotional regulation overlap with those processing the affective dimension of pain (e.g., the limbic system), whereas structures such as the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices and the thalamus are more specifically involved in sensory dimension pain [28].
There are indications that sensory and affective pain components could be differently associated with the disease outcome or with other symptoms. For instance, in orofacial chronic pain, the sensory pain level predicts low functional outcome but high social support, while affective pain predicts higher pain interference and affective distress [29]. Moreover, affective pain can be selectively altered by mood [30,31] and by cognitive manipulations [32]. Further, there exists evidence that the association between pain and sleep disorders probably relies on neurophysiological alterations such as increased pain facilitation or impaired pain inhibition [11]. Finally, FM and mood disorders share similar stress-induced pathophysiologies [33].
Affective and sensory pain dimensions are partially independent [27,34], implying that mechanisms linking them to other clinical symptoms such as sleep and mood disorders would not be identical. Knowing the prominent affective dysfunction observed in FM [33], we made the general hypothesis that the affective component of pain would play a predominant role in the interplay between pain, mood disorders, and sleep dysfunction, thereby showing a stronger association with them than the sensory component of pain and other pain indicators. The aim of this study was, therefore, to investigate how pain (evaluated through its affective and sensory dimensions, as well as other indicators), mood, and sleep disorders interact in FM patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Ethics

This case-control observational study involved patients suffering from FM and healthy controls of similar age. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical Committee of Vaud (CER-VD) under the number PB_2016-00739 (initial number 331/15). Each participant signed an informed consent form prior to any data collection and received a financial compensation thereafter. The study complied with all international ethical regulations, including the Helsinki declaration.

2.2. Participants

Patients were recruited between November 2018 and February 2020, mainly through neurologists, rheumatologists, and pain specialists from Fribourg Hospital, and through Swiss FM associations, using web-based, oral, and flyer advertisements. The diagnosis of FM had to be made by a specialist (rheumatologist, neurologist, or pain specialist) and meet internationally admitted diagnosis criteria (see below). All participants were adults (age ≥ 18 years old) and right-handed, following indications for possible lateralization in brain function related to chronic pain [35], including in FM [36]. In order to avoid data variability due to sex influence on pain perception [37,38] and taking into account the epidemiology of FM [39], we included exclusively females. Exclusion criteria for all participants consisted of the following: existence of central nervous system lesion or diseases such as epilepsy or parasomnia, severe cognitive impairment or psychiatric disease, and surgery involving any nervous system structure less than six months before inclusion. Existence of any pain was an additional exclusion criterion in controls. In total, 16 FM patients and 11 controls (aged 51.8 (8.5) and 54.2 (4.6) years, respectively) were included in the final analysis of the study, as shown in the selection flowchart (Figure 1).

2.3. Data Collection

Data were collected in the frame of a larger study investigating the involvement of brain GABAergic signaling in FM. However, in this paper, we exclusively focused on results related to clinical pain, sleep, and mood disorders assessments. Each participant was interviewed following a standardized questionnaire (general epidemiological data, treatments, relevant medical history) and underwent a brief neurological examination for further characterization in order to identify exclusion criteria.
The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was compiled for insomnia assessment [40] and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was employed to determine the existence of anxiety and depression [41]. Three specific questionnaires (the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) [42], the Symptoms Severity Score (SSS), and the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR 2010)) were used for the diagnosis of FM. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to quantify pain intensity on the day of evaluation and the average pain level over the week prior [43]; the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4) to assess the neuropathic pattern of pain [44]; the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire to separately evaluate sensory (MPQsens) and affective (MPQaff) pain components [45] and the obtained scores were reported out of 10 for easy interpretation in comparison with the VAS. Within the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), the impact of pain on patients’ life was assessed using the BPI severity (BPIsev) and BPI interference (BPIint) composite scores [46]. The WPI was further considered for a quantitative estimate of pain extension over the body in order to assess how this factor could relate to other clinical indicators.
To determine pathological mood and sleep scores, the following cut-offs were considered: HADanx/HADdep, respectively: <7 = normal mood state, 8–10 = mild anxiety/depression, 11–14 = moderate anxiety/depression, 15–21 = severe anxiety/depression [41]; ISI: <7 = no clinically significant insomnia, 8–14 = subthreshold insomnia, 15–21 = clinical insomnia of moderate intensity, 22–28 = clinical insomnia of severe intensity [40]. The neuropathic pattern of pain was confirmed when the DN4 was ≥4 [44].

2.4. Data Analysis

2.4.1. FM Diagnosis and Classifications of Clinical Scores

The diagnosis of FM was confirmed by internationally accepted standards using the FiRST score (>5) and the ACR 2010 criteria (i.e., SSS ≥ 7 and WPI ≥ 5 or SSS ≥ 9 and WPI 3–6) [47]. Since pain score cut-offs are highly debated and vary according to studies and contexts, we opted, in general, to analyze pain data without classification or cut-off. We assessed specific descriptors and correlations, except when analyzing the current (ongoing) pain intensity, knowing its emerging role in FM-related pathological modifications occurring in pain matrix [48]. Taking into account that the definition of successful analgesia is VAS < 3 [49] and that our previous data showed significant differences in pain-related neurophysiological EEG markers when VAS ≥ 3 [35], we considered the latter threshold to define a significant pain, even if other classifications of pain severity exist [43,50]. Additionally, pain was considered to be moderate and severe when VAS equaled, respectively, 4.5–7.4 and 7.5–10 [51].

2.4.2. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with R software using standard descriptors (mean (SD)) and significance was admitted at p < 0.05. Group differences were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and correlations using Pearson’s r correlation coefficient (two-sided). The Bayes factor (BF) was additionally computed for the complementary interpretation of correlation trends in order to estimate potential biases due to the small sample size: while a BF ≥ 3 was in favor of the non-null hypothesis, a BF ≤ 1 was considered as favoring the null hypothesis, and a BF value between 1 and 3 to have undetermined value [52].

3. Results

3.1. General Data

Patients complained of the typical FM widespread pain (WPI 12.69(3.57)), with moderate pain intensity on the day of evaluation (VASd 4.75(2.84)/10) and higher level during the week before assessment (6.38(2.11), p = 0.035). The latter score was similar to the score of the BPI question n°5 recalling the general pain level (6.25(1.61), p = 0.797). Thus, we referred to last week’s VAS as VASgen. MPQaff and MPQsens were assessed to be similar (5.88(2.87)/10 and 5.29(2.33)/10, respectively; p = 0.318). Patients evaluated their pain as being overall moderately severe (BPIsev 5.97(1.32)/10) and prominently interfering with their daily life (BPIint 6.24(1.50)/10). Most FM patients described their pain in terms of recalling neuropathic features, which was confirmed by the DN4 score of 5.75(1.95). Patients’ sensory impairments and treatments are detailed in Table 1.
Patients suffered from moderate insomnia (68.75% with ISI ≥ 15) [40] and were moderately anxious (62% with HADanx ≥ 8) and depressed (87.5% with HADdep ≥ 8), while controls displayed neither insomnia nor mood disorders (Figure 2).

3.2. Associations between Pain Indicators

MPQaff correlated with MPQsens and, in the subgroup of patients undergoing high ongoing pain intensity (VASd ≥ 3), it tended to correlate with VASd (Table 2). VASgen correlated with MPQsens. Beyond the relationship between affective and sensory pain, these observations suggested that affective pain went along with the ongoing pain intensity, while the general pain could be related to the sensory dimension of pain. The DN4 score was more strongly related to MPQsens than MPQaff and correlated to VASgen, while the WPI was solely correlated to VASd. All pain characteristics statistically related to MPQsens were individually correlated to the BPIsev score, although affective pain also displayed a correlation, albeit to a lesser extent, with BPIsev. In contrast, only MPQaff was correlated with BPIint.
Overall, it appeared that sensory pain was linked with specific pain characteristics (neuropathic pain, general pain level), in relation with pain severity, while affective pain, although correlated with sensory pain, interfered more with the patients’ lives.

3.3. Associations between Mood, Sleep, and Pain Descriptors

HADanx positively correlated with ISI and with HADdep, while there was no correlation between ISI and HADdep. On the other hand, MPQaff was the only pain score that tended to correlate with both HADanx and ISI, but not with HADdep. No correlation was observed between VASd, VASgen, and MPQsens and any of the mood and sleep indicators (Table 2). When controlling for HADanx, the correlation between ISI and MPQaff decreased and became nonsignificant (r = 0.30, p = 0.272), indicating that HADanx influenced the association between ISI and MPQaff. Thus, anxiety could at least partially mediate the link between insomnia and affective pain. When patients were divided into pathological and nonpathological subgroups, respectively, according to the existence of anxiety (HADanx ≥ 8) and insomnia (ISI ≥ 15) (Table 3), anxious and insomniac patients showed significantly higher MPQaff scores than nonaffected patients. Patients displaying clinical insomnia were more significantly anxious than noninsomniac individuals, with no difference noticed in their HADdep scores, while those with clinical anxiety tended to have higher ISI scores than nonanxious patients (significance not reached). Of notice, the abovementioned pathological categorizations did not disclose any difference regarding MPQsens or any of the VAS scores. Comparison between depressed and nondepressed individuals was not possible, as the majority of patients (87.5%) had pathological HADdep scores.
In summary, the affective component of pain appeared to be the only pain descriptor sensitive to the coexistence of anxiety and insomnia in FM patients, in contrast to other pain characteristics, whereas insomnia and anxiety reciprocally influenced each other (with possibly more influence of insomnia on anxiety than the opposite).

3.4. Impact of Ongoing Pain

In presence of high ongoing pain (VASd ≥ 3), HADanx was more strongly correlated to ISI but similarly associated to HADdep, which was linked to MPQsens, BPIint, and ISI (Table 2). However, in absence of significant pain intensity, all the abovementioned associations disappeared (data not shown). Overall, the ongoing pain appeared as an “amplifier”, connecting the current pain intensity to the affective pain and strengthening the relationship between sleep and mood dysfunctions.

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated the associations between pain, mood, and sleep disorders in FM patients in order to disentangle the complex interplay between these important clinical factors, with the hypothesis that the affective component of pain would be a key player. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the association between pain, mood, and sleep through discrimination between the sensory and affective pain dimensions in FM. However, and despite interesting findings, these results should be considered with caution—due to the small sample size—and further confirmed with larger studies.
While both anxiety and insomnia were tendentially correlated to affective pain, no correlation was observed with other pain indicators. Furthermore, the existence of anxiety and insomnia significantly worsened the affective, but not the sensory, pain component or pain intensity. The link between the affective (not the sensory) dimension of pain and both anxiety and insomnia, and the additional association found between anxiety and insomnia, completed an “affective pain–insomnia–anxiety” loop, while pain intensity did not uncover meaningful interactions. These results support our hypothesis, reinforcing the importance of considering pain as a multidimensional concept in the study of chronic pain, especially in FM research.
The affective component of pain is evaluated through items that give the emotional valence to pain but are at the same time evocative of anxiety patterns, even if they do not properly evaluate anxiety [45,53]. Thus, it is not surprising to find a correlation trend between the affective component of pain and anxiety, and most importantly, high affective pain scores in anxious FM patients. As for the link between insomnia and affective pain, one possible explanation could be the disruption in the emotional modulation of pain induced by insomnia [54], related to impaired activities in brain regions such as the amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), insula, or frontal cortex [55], which are also implicated in affective pain processing [28]. Interestingly, these brain areas undergo function alterations in FM patients [56] and can be experimentally influenced by negative mood [57]. As brain pathways and structures regulating the affective dimension of pain are also implicated in anxiety [58] and sleep disorders [55], they probably constitute one important basis for the relationship between the affective pain dimension and both insomnia and anxiety.
Anxiety was associated with insomnia in FM patients, but insomniac patients tended to be more anxious than the anxious patients were insomniac, which suggests that insomnia more importantly influenced the appearance of anxiety than the reverse. Since both anxiety and insomnia similarly impacted affective pain, one plausible hypothesis about the “affective pain–insomnia–anxiety” loop could be that anxiety acts as a mediator of the link between insomnia and affective pain, as supported by our results. Indeed, anxiety has been shown to mediate the relationship between insomnia and pain incidence [59], while negative and positive affects mediate the relationship between sleep and pain interference [60].
Although the relationship between sleep disorders and chronic pain has often been reported as bidirectional, recent findings suggest the direction to be stronger from sleep disorders to chronic pain [11]. Thus, the loop would preferentially orient in the direction from insomnia to pain and to anxiety, and secondarily go from anxiety to pain (Figure 3). This statement has important clinical implications, because treatments aiming at reducing insomnia could at the same time reduce anxiety, and further decrease pain. Indeed, such reports already exist in the literature. For instance, a recent study found that a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) targeting insomnia not only improved sleep quality, but also showed a better long-term improvement in both sleep and pain than a CBT targeting pain, although the latter also induced some sleep amelioration [61]. Furthermore, a CBT targeting both pain and sleep dysfunction was more effective in reducing insomnia than a CBT targeting only pain [62].
Nevertheless, pain increases/induces anxiety, which in turn, worsens pain perception [19]. In addition, pain is known to negatively affect sleep, inducing insomnia among other sleep dysfunctions [63]. These observations maintain the bidirectional relationship, despite the preferential direction mentioned above (Figure 3). Overall, they illustrate how, in FM, restoring one component of the abovementioned pain–insomnia–anxiety loop could, through a sort of virtuous circle, allow improvement of the other components.
One mechanism underlying the pathological vicious circle between pain, insomnia, and anxiety could be the hyperexcitability of the central nervous system that exists in chronic pain syndromes and to which highly contributes central sensitization, one of the main FM features [64]. Indeed, insomnia, anxiety, and chronic pain are each associated with increased brain excitation [65,66], and could thus mutually reinforce each other this way. The implication of limbic structures (see above [55,58]) could explain the importance of the affective pain component in the loop. However, these highly speculative allegations need confirmation through dedicated investigations, in order to give more insights into this clinical loop disclosed as a potential key player in the pathology of FM.
Depression was highly prevalent among FM patients. However, apart from the well-known correlation with anxiety [67], depression was solely associated with sensory pain, pain interference, and insomnia, and this was true only in the presence of high ongoing pain intensity. Pain extent, measured with the WPI, was also correlated to ongoing pain. Interestingly, pain extent is associated with depression severity in FM patients [68]. Overall, these findings suggest that depression could be a direct consequence of suffering due to sensory painful feeling in FM patients when the daily level of pain (and thereof pain extension) was particularly high. Thus, depression does not appear to be part of the pain–insomnia–anxiety pathological loop. Nevertheless, one cannot completely rule out a possible participation of depression in FM pathology, since depression and FM share similar physiological mechanisms and genetic predisposition, especially in the case of major depressive disorder [33].
The sensory component of pain was related to the neuropathic feature and the severity of pain, which both correlated also with the general pain level. These results point out the contribution of the sensory dimension of pain in the disease burden, in addition to associated depression. However, the lack of correlation with descriptors of mood and sleep disorders suggests that it plays a minor role in the interplay between pain, sleep, and mood dysfunctions, or has only an indirect link through correlation with the affective pain component. The latter was strongly correlated with pain interference, which, as expected from the pathological loop hypothesized above, was also associated with insomnia and, to a lesser extent, to anxiety. Altogether, these observations further discriminate how the sensory and the affective pain dimensions, and associated symptoms and pain modalities, would, respectively, contribute to the high impact of FM on the patients’ quality of life [2,69].
High ongoing pain, by strengthening the association between anxiety and insomnia, and disclosing a link between sensory pain, insomnia, and depression, acted as an amplifier reinforcing the affective pain–insomnia–anxiety loop (Figure 3). In line with these findings, a recent study showed a prominent role of ongoing pain intensity in FM [48], with increased functional connectivity between the default-mode network and the insula—a key structure in pain regulation—a cluster noticed in the anterior insula highly implicated in the control of the affective dimension of pain [28]. Alteration in functional connectivity could be a marker of central sensitization [70], a prominent pathological feature in FM [71]. Thus, the deleterious role played by ongoing pain in FM appears to originate from functional impairment within the pain matrix.
Despite interesting findings, this study holds some limitations, the most important of them being the small sample. Additionally, correlation trends, instead of statistically significant correlations for some associations (despite shown BF), impose cautiousness in confirming the proposed pathological clinical model. The affective pain–insomnia–anxiety loop should not be considered as displaying a causal relationship between studied variables, which was beyond the scope of the cross-sectional study design.

5. Conclusions

This study, by pointing out the prominent role of the affective dimension of pain and its association with insomnia and anxiety in FM, proposes for the first time a clinical pathological model involving all three clinical indicators, with potential therapeutic implications. This model, while suggesting affective pain as a key pain dimension in FM, constitutes an additional indication that FM should be approached through a multidimensional scope when attempting to understand underlying pathological mechanisms or when seeking appropriate therapeutic strategies. The amplifying role of ongoing pain level by integrating external factors to the model or by strengthening associations between model components is in accordance with its recently shown impact on dysfunctional connectivity in pain-related pathways of FM patients. Despite the small sample size, the disclosed affective pain–insomnia–anxiety loop fits in a theoretical frame coherent with existing literature and deserves further confirmation through larger and more documented studies. Ultimately, this study points out the importance of focusing on meaningful clinical variables and outcomes of pain syndromes in order to better understand their pathological determinants and optimize their management.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.N.C.; methodology, L.-N.M. and J.N.C.; validation, L.-N.M. and J.N.C.; formal analysis, L.-N.M. and D.d.O.F.; investigation, L.-N.M., C.M. and M.M.; resources, J.N.C.; data curation, L.-N.M., D.d.O.F., C.M. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, L.-N.M. and J.N.C.; writing—review and editing, D.d.O.F., C.M. and M.M.; visualization, L.-N.M. and J.N.C.; supervision, J.N.C.; project administration, J.N.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethical Committee of Vaud (CER-VD) under the number PB_2016-00739 (initial number 331/15).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hauser, W.; Ablin, J.; Fitzcharles, M.A.; Littlejohn, G.; Luciano, J.V.; Usui, C.; Walitt, B. Fibromyalgia. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2015, 1, 15022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chinn, S.; Caldwell, W.; Gritsenko, K. Fibromyalgia Pathogenesis and Treatment Options Update. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2016, 20, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Marques, A.P.; Santo, A.; Berssaneti, A.A.; Matsutani, L.A.; Yuan, S.L.K. Prevalence of fibromyalgia: Literature review update. Rev. Bras. Reumatol. Engl. Ed. 2017, 57, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Choy, E.H. The role of sleep in pain and fibromyalgia. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2015, 11, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bigatti, S.M.; Hernandez, A.M.; Cronan, T.A.; Rand, K.L. Sleep disturbances in fibromyalgia syndrome: Relationship to pain and depression. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 59, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Andrade, A.; Vilarino, G.T.; Sieczkowska, S.M.; Coimbra, D.R.; Bevilacqua, G.G.; Steffens, R.A.K. The relationship between sleep quality and fibromyalgia symptoms. J. Health Psychol. 2020, 25, 1176–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. van den Berg, B.; Hijma, H.J.; Koopmans, I.; Doll, R.J.; Zuiker, R.; Groeneveld, G.J.; Buitenweg, J.R. Simultaneous measurement of intra-epidermal electric detection thresholds and evoked potentials for observation of nociceptive processing following sleep deprivation. Exp. Brain Res. 2022, 240, 631–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Smith, M.T.; Edwards, R.R.; McCann, U.D.; Haythornthwaite, J.A. The effects of sleep deprivation on pain inhibition and spontaneous pain in women. Sleep 2007, 30, 494–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haack, M.; Scott-Sutherland, J.; Santangelo, G.; Simpson, N.S.; Sethna, N.; Mullington, J.M. Pain sensitivity and modulation in primary insomnia. Eur. J. Pain 2012, 16, 522–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Husak, A.J.; Bair, M.J. Chronic Pain and Sleep Disturbances: A Pragmatic Review of Their Relationships, Comorbidities, and Treatments. Pain Med. 2020, 21, 1142–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Herrero Babiloni, A.; De Koninck, B.P.; Beetz, G.; De Beaumont, L.; Martel, M.O.; Lavigne, G.J. Sleep and pain: Recent insights, mechanisms, and future directions in the investigation of this relationship. J. Neural. Transm. 2020, 127, 647–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Diaz-Piedra, C.; Di Stasi, L.L.; Baldwin, C.M.; Buela-Casal, G.; Catena, A. Sleep disturbances of adult women suffering from fibromyalgia: A systematic review of observational studies. Sleep Med. Rev. 2015, 21, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rizzi, M.; Radovanovic, D.; Santus, P.; Airoldi, A.; Frassanito, F.; Vanni, S.; Cristiano, A.; Masala, I.F.; Sarzi-Puttini, P. Influence of autonomic nervous system dysfunction in the genesis of sleep disorders in fibromyalgia patients. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2017, 35 (Suppl. 105), 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fietta, P.; Fietta, P.; Manganelli, P. Fibromyalgia and psychiatric disorders. Acta Biomed. 2007, 78, 88–95. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hadlandsmyth, K.; Dailey, D.L.; Rakel, B.A.; Zimmerman, M.B.; Vance, C.G.; Merriwether, E.N.; Chimenti, R.L.; Geasland, K.M.; Crofford, L.J.; Sluka, K.A. Somatic symptom presentations in women with fibromyalgia are differentially associated with elevated depression and anxiety. J. Health Psychol. 2020, 25, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Galvez-Sanchez, C.M.; Montoro, C.I.; Duschek, S.; Reyes Del Paso, G.A. Depression and trait-anxiety mediate the influence of clinical pain on health-related quality of life in fibromyalgia. J. Affect Disord. 2020, 265, 486–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Consoli, G.; Marazziti, D.; Ciapparelli, A.; Bazzichi, L.; Massimetti, G.; Giacomelli, C.; Rossi, A.; Bombardieri, S.; Dell’Osso, L. The impact of mood, anxiety, and sleep disorders on fibromyalgia. Compr. Psychiatry 2012, 53, 962–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Paul-Savoie, E.; Marchand, S.; Morin, M.; Bourgault, P.; Brissette, N.; Rattanavong, V.; Cloutier, C.; Bissonnette, A.; Potvin, S. Is the deficit in pain inhibition in fibromyalgia influenced by sleep impairments? Open Rheumatol. J. 2012, 6, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Michaelides, A.; Zis, P. Depression, anxiety and acute pain: Links and management challenges. Postgrad. Med. 2019, 131, 438–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rainville, P. Brain mechanisms of pain affect and pain modulation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2002, 12, 195–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Krause, A.J.; Prather, A.A.; Wager, T.D.; Lindquist, M.A.; Walker, M.P. The Pain of Sleep Loss: A Brain Characterization in Humans. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 2291–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Melzack, R. Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. J. Dent. Educ. 2001, 65, 1378–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Salaffi, F.; Sarzi-Puttini, P.; Atzeni, F. How to measure chronic pain: New concepts. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2015, 29, 164–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Di Tella, M.; Ghiggia, A.; Tesio, V.; Romeo, A.; Colonna, F.; Fusaro, E.; Torta, R.; Castelli, L. Pain experience in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: The role of alexithymia and psychological distress. J. Affect Disord. 2017, 208, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wiech, K.; Tracey, I. The influence of negative emotions on pain: Behavioral effects and neural mechanisms. Neuroimage 2009, 47, 987–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, J.H.; Wei, C.Z.; Huang, L.Y.; Wang, W.; Lei, Z.J.; Liang, D.H.; Wang, F.; Wang, X.Y.; Liu, K.; Hou, X.J.; et al. Study on the prevalence of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome in Guangxi, China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 2007, 28, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  27. Talbot, K.; Madden, V.J.; Jones, S.L.; Moseley, G.L. The sensory and affective components of pain: Are they differentially modifiable dimensions or inseparable aspects of a unitary experience? A systematic review. Br. J. Anaesth. 2019, 123, e263–e272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Price, D.D. Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science 2000, 288, 1769–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Boggero, I.A.; Carlson, C.R. Somatosensory and affective contributions to emotional, social, and daily functioning in chronic pain patients. Pain Med. 2015, 16, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Rainville, P.; Bao, Q.V.; Chretien, P. Pain-related emotions modulate experimental pain perception and autonomic responses. Pain 2005, 118, 306–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Giesecke, T.; Gracely, R.H.; Williams, D.A.; Geisser, M.E.; Petzke, F.W.; Clauw, D.J. The relationship between depression, clinical pain, and experimental pain in a chronic pain cohort. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52, 1577–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bushnell, M.C.; Ceko, M.; Low, L.A. Cognitive and emotional control of pain and its disruption in chronic pain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013, 14, 502–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Gracely, R.H.; Ceko, M.; Bushnell, M.C. Fibromyalgia and depression. Pain Res. Treat. 2012, 2012, 486590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Xiao, X.; Zhang, Y.Q. A new perspective on the anterior cingulate cortex and affective pain. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018, 90, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Teixeira, M.; Mancini, C.; Wicht, C.A.; Maestretti, G.; Kuntzer, T.; Cazzoli, D.; Mouthon, M.; Annoni, J.M.; Chabwine, J.N. Beta Electroencephalographic Oscillation Is a Potential GABAergic Biomarker of Chronic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 594536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ichesco, E.; Schmidt-Wilcke, T.; Bhavsar, R.; Clauw, D.J.; Peltier, S.J.; Kim, J.; Napadow, V.; Hampson, J.P.; Kairys, A.E.; Williams, D.A.; et al. Altered resting state connectivity of the insular cortex in individuals with fibromyalgia. J. Pain 2014, 15, 815–826.e811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Fillingim, R.B.; King, C.D.; Ribeiro-Dasilva, M.C.; Rahim-Williams, B.; Riley, J.L., 3rd. Sex, gender, and pain: A review of recent clinical and experimental findings. J. Pain 2009, 10, 447–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kowalczyk, W.J.; Evans, S.M.; Bisaga, A.M.; Sullivan, M.A.; Comer, S.D. Sex differences and hormonal influences on response to cold pressor pain in humans. J. Pain 2006, 7, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Menzies, V. CE: Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Current Considerations in Symptom Management. AJN Am. J. Nurs. 2016, 116, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Morin, C.M.; Belleville, G.; Belanger, L.; Ivers, H. The Insomnia Severity Index: Psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep 2011, 34, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Zigmond, A.S.; Snaith, R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1983, 67, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Perrot, S.; Bouhassira, D.; Fermanian, J.; Cercle d’Etude de la Douleur en, R. Development and validation of the Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST). Pain 2010, 150, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Collins, S.L.; Moore, R.A.; McQuay, H.J. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: What is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain 1997, 72, 95–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bouhassira, D.; Attal, N.; Alchaar, H.; Boureau, F.; Brochet, B.; Bruxelle, J.; Cunin, G.; Fermanian, J.; Ginies, P.; Grun-Overdyking, A.; et al. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain 2005, 114, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dworkin, R.H.; Turk, D.C.; Revicki, D.A.; Harding, G.; Coyne, K.S.; Peirce-Sandner, S.; Bhagwat, D.; Everton, D.; Burke, L.B.; Cowan, P.; et al. Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2). Pain 2009, 144, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Cleeland, C.S.; Ryan, K.M. Pain assessment: Global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap. 1994, 23, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Wolfe, F.; Clauw, D.J.; Fitzcharles, M.A.; Goldenberg, D.L.; Katz, R.S.; Mease, P.; Russell, A.S.; Russell, I.J.; Winfield, J.B.; Yunus, M.B. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res. 2010, 62, 600–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Čeko, M.; Frangos, E.; Gracely, J.; Richards, E.; Wang, B.; Schweinhardt, P.; Catherine Bushnell, M. Default mode network changes in fibromyalgia patients are largely dependent on current clinical pain. NeuroImage 2020, 216, 116877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Myles, P.S.; Myles, D.B.; Galagher, W.; Boyd, D.; Chew, C.; MacDonald, N.; Dennis, A. Measuring acute postoperative pain using the visual analog scale: The minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state. Br. J. Anaesth. 2017, 118, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mantha, S.; Thisted, R.; Foss, J.; Ellis, J.E.; Roizen, M.F. A proposal to use confidence intervals for visual analog scale data for pain measurement to determine clinical significance. Anesth. Analg. 1993, 77, 1041–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hawker, G.A.; Mian, S.; Kendzerska, T.; French, M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res. 2011, 63 (Suppl. 11), S240–S252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kruschke, J.K.; Liddell, T.M. Bayesian data analysis for newcomers. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2018, 25, 155–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Melzack, R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 1987, 30, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. DelVentura, J.L.; Terry, E.L.; Bartley, E.J.; Rhudy, J.L. Emotional modulation of pain and spinal nociception in persons with severe insomnia symptoms. Ann. Behav. Med. 2014, 47, 303–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Schiel, J.E.; Holub, F.; Petri, R.; Leerssen, J.; Tamm, S.; Tahmasian, M.; Riemann, D.; Spiegelhalder, K. Affect and Arousal in Insomnia: Through a Lens of Neuroimaging Studies. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 2020, 22, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Burgmer, M.; Pogatzki-Zahn, E.; Gaubitz, M.; Wessoleck, E.; Heuft, G.; Pfleiderer, B. Altered brain activity during pain processing in fibromyalgia. Neuroimage 2009, 44, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Berna, C.; Leknes, S.; Holmes, E.A.; Edwards, R.R.; Goodwin, G.M.; Tracey, I. Induction of depressed mood disrupts emotion regulation neurocircuitry and enhances pain unpleasantness. Biol. Psychiatry 2010, 67, 1083–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhuo, M. Neural Mechanisms Underlying Anxiety-Chronic Pain Interactions. Trends Neurosci. 2016, 39, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dunietz, G.L.; Swanson, L.M.; Jansen, E.C.; Chervin, R.D.; O’Brien, L.M.; Lisabeth, L.D.; Braley, T.J. Key insomnia symptoms and incident pain in older adults: Direct and mediated pathways through depression and anxiety. Sleep 2018, 41, zsy125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ravyts, S.G.; Dzierzewski, J.M.; Grah, S.C.; Buman, M.P.; Aiken-Morgan, A.T.; Giacobb, P.R., Jr.; Roberts, B.L.; Marsiske, M.; McCrae, C.S. Sleep and Pain in Mid- to Late-Life: An Exploration of Day-to-Day Pain Inconsistency. Clin. Gerontol. 2018, 41, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. McCrae, C.S.; Williams, J.; Roditi, D.; Anderson, R.; Mundt, J.M.; Miller, M.B.; Curtis, A.F.; Waxenberg, L.B.; Staud, R.; Berry, R.B.; et al. Cognitive behavioral treatments for insomnia and pain in adults with comorbid chronic insomnia and fibromyalgia: Clinical outcomes from the SPIN randomized controlled trial. Sleep 2019, 42, zsy234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Prados, G.; Miro, E.; Martinez, M.P.; Sanchez, A.I.; Lami, M.J.; Caliz, R. Combined cognitive-behavioral therapy for fibromyalgia: Effects on polysomnographic parameters and perceived sleep quality. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2020, 20, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Finan, P.H.; Goodin, B.R.; Smith, M.T. The association of sleep and pain: An update and a path forward. J. Pain 2013, 14, 1539–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Meeus, M.; Nijs, J. Central sensitization: A biopsychosocial explanation for chronic widespread pain in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin. Rheumatol. 2007, 26, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Nijs, J.; Mairesse, O.; Neu, D.; Leysen, L.; Danneels, L.; Cagnie, B.; Meeus, M.; Moens, M.; Ickmans, K.; Goubert, D. Sleep Disturbances in Chronic Pain: Neurobiology, Assessment, and Treatment in Physical Therapist Practice. Phys. Ther. 2018, 98, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Clark, J.R.; Nijs, J.; Yeowell, G.; Holmes, P.; Goodwin, P.C. Trait Sensitivity, Anxiety, and Personality Are Predictive of Central Sensitization Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. Pain Pract. 2019, 19, 800–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Eysenck, M.W.; Fajkowska, M. Anxiety and depression: Toward overlapping and distinctive features. Cogn. Emot. 2018, 32, 1391–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Manchikanti, L.; Pampati, V.; Beyer, C.; Damron, K. Do number of pain conditions influence emotional status? Pain Physician 2002, 5, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hauser, W.; Sarzi-Puttini, P.; Fitzcharles, M.A. Fibromyalgia syndrome: Under-, over- and misdiagnosis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2019, 37 (Suppl. 116), 90–97. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Basu, N.; Kaplan, C.M.; Ichesco, E.; Larkin, T.; Harris, R.E.; Murray, A.; Waiter, G.; Clauw, D.J. Neurobiologic Features of Fibromyalgia Are Also Present Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018, 70, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Boomershine, C.S. Fibromyalgia: The prototypical central sensitivity syndrome. Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 2015, 11, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 11 03296 g001 550
Figure 1. Overview of the selection procedure for participants in the study. In total, 31 participants were screened (18 patients and 13 controls). Two patients were secondarily excluded from the analysis because they finally presented one exclusion criterion each (head traumatism and one of the FM diagnosing score below defined limit). The two excluded controls complained of pain when they were interviewed.
Figure 1. Overview of the selection procedure for participants in the study. In total, 31 participants were screened (18 patients and 13 controls). Two patients were secondarily excluded from the analysis because they finally presented one exclusion criterion each (head traumatism and one of the FM diagnosing score below defined limit). The two excluded controls complained of pain when they were interviewed.
Jcm 11 03296 g001
Jcm 11 03296 g002 550
Figure 2. Sleep and mood scores in FM patients and controls. Dashed horizontal lines represent respective threshold scores for clinically significant insomnia (ISI ≥ 15), anxiety, and depression (HADanx and HADdep ≥ 8). Different levels of significance are represented, respectively, by ** (p < 0.01) and *** (p < 0.001). The ISI average score disclosed moderate insomnia in FM patients (17.75(5.27)) and was significantly higher than controls who had no insomnia (6.09(5.22), p < 0.001). Patients were at the limits of moderate anxiety (10.50(4.12)) and depression (10.94(3.07)), while controls had normal scores (respectively, 6.18(2.52), p = 0.005; 1.71(1.19), p < 0.001).
Figure 2. Sleep and mood scores in FM patients and controls. Dashed horizontal lines represent respective threshold scores for clinically significant insomnia (ISI ≥ 15), anxiety, and depression (HADanx and HADdep ≥ 8). Different levels of significance are represented, respectively, by ** (p < 0.01) and *** (p < 0.001). The ISI average score disclosed moderate insomnia in FM patients (17.75(5.27)) and was significantly higher than controls who had no insomnia (6.09(5.22), p < 0.001). Patients were at the limits of moderate anxiety (10.50(4.12)) and depression (10.94(3.07)), while controls had normal scores (respectively, 6.18(2.52), p = 0.005; 1.71(1.19), p < 0.001).
Jcm 11 03296 g002
Jcm 11 03296 g003 550
Figure 3. Affective pain–insomnia–anxiety loop and the role of ongoing pain intensity. The main constituents of the loop are labeled in black: affective pain, insomnia, and anxiety. Similarly, black arrows show their relationship, with the main direction being indicated by thicker arrows. Insomnia directly relates to affective pain but also through anxiety. Thus, all main arrows point to affective pain. The reverse relationship, although existing, is not favored by currently available data (narrower black arrows). Sensory pain is correlated to affective pain, and not to insomnia or anxiety, while depression is solely related to anxiety. These links seem to be out of the loop (grey boxes and arrows). In the presence of significant ongoing pain (VAS ≥ 3), not only does the correlation between insomnia and anxiety increase (not shown), but a new correlation appears on one hand between sensory pain and depression, and on the other hand between insomnia and depression (dashed grey arrows). Thus, high pain appears not only to reinforce the loop, but also to put into play other clinical factors that primarily appeared not to be involved in the loop (i.e., depression and sensory pain).
Figure 3. Affective pain–insomnia–anxiety loop and the role of ongoing pain intensity. The main constituents of the loop are labeled in black: affective pain, insomnia, and anxiety. Similarly, black arrows show their relationship, with the main direction being indicated by thicker arrows. Insomnia directly relates to affective pain but also through anxiety. Thus, all main arrows point to affective pain. The reverse relationship, although existing, is not favored by currently available data (narrower black arrows). Sensory pain is correlated to affective pain, and not to insomnia or anxiety, while depression is solely related to anxiety. These links seem to be out of the loop (grey boxes and arrows). In the presence of significant ongoing pain (VAS ≥ 3), not only does the correlation between insomnia and anxiety increase (not shown), but a new correlation appears on one hand between sensory pain and depression, and on the other hand between insomnia and depression (dashed grey arrows). Thus, high pain appears not only to reinforce the loop, but also to put into play other clinical factors that primarily appeared not to be involved in the loop (i.e., depression and sensory pain).
Jcm 11 03296 g003
Table
Table 1. Pain-associated neurological symptoms and treatment in FM patients.
Table 1. Pain-associated neurological symptoms and treatment in FM patients.
Neurological SymptomsType of Symptomsn/16
Negative symptoms *7
Positive symptoms **4
Normal5
TreatmentType of Treatmentn/16
NSAID7
Antidepressants7
Physical and alternative5
Antimigrainous4
Benzodiazepines3
Opiates2
Other drugs5
None3
* Hypoesthesia (touch and pain); ** Paresthesia and hyperesthesia. NSAID: Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs.
Table
Table 2. Correlations between clinical scores in FM patients.
Table 2. Correlations between clinical scores in FM patients.
12345678910
1. ISI-
2. HADanx0.59 a*-
(0.84 a**)
3. HADdep0.410.56 a*-
(0.67 b*)(0.68 b*)
4. MPQaff0.48 b0.44 b0.14-
(0.45)(0.36)(0.49)
5. MPQsen0.330.160.010.64 a**-
(0.29)(0.39)(0.73 a*)(0.69 b*)
6. VASd−0.37−0.29−0.19−0.110.24
(0.27)(0.43)(0.26)(0.61 b)(0.53 b)
7. VASgen−0.000.020.150.290.62 a*0.39-
(0.27)(−0.07)(0.41)(0.47)(0.55 b)(0.18)
8. BPIsev0.220.150.070.51 b*0.71 a**0.44 b0.66 a**-
(0.40)(0.33)(0.50)(0.68 b*)(0.63 b)(0.77 a*)(0.66 b*)
9. BPIint0.63 a**0.47 b0.390.64 a**0.29−0.41−0.030.26-
(0.55 b)(0.38)(0.69 b*)(0.72 a*)(0.43)(0.15)(0.36)(0.44)
10. WPI−0.22−0.07−0.36−0.360.010.57 a*0.220.18−0.40-
(0.29)(0.42)(0.55)(−0.46)(−0.58 b)(0.02)(−0.66 b)(−0.35)(−0.38)
11. DN4−0.10−0.020.120.55 b*0.71 a**0.340.69 a**0.63 a**0.20−0.10
(0.35)(0.04)(0.65 b)(0.47)(0.67 b*)(0.11)(0.90 a**)(0.59 b)(0.47)(−0.66 b)
Correlation coefficient (Pearson’s r) of the subgroup of FM patients with VAS ≥ 3 (n = 9) are written in brackets below the coefficient of the whole group (n = 16). Significant correlations are in bold (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01), while correlation trends (0.1 > p ≥ 0.05) are in italic. a BF ≥ 3. b 1 < BF < 3.
Table
Table 3. Univariate comparisons of pain, sleep, and mood scores in FM patients between pathological and nonpathological groups.
Table 3. Univariate comparisons of pain, sleep, and mood scores in FM patients between pathological and nonpathological groups.
NMean ± SDFp-Value
Affective pain
No insomnia53.00 ± 1.5913.360.003
Insomnia117.18 ± 2.30
No anxiety63.58 ± 2.319.710.008
Anxiety107.25 ± 2.26
Sensory pain
No insomnia54.11 ± 2.031.990.180
Insomnia115.83 ± 2.34
No anxiety64.40 ± 2.111.450.248
Anxiety105.83 ± 2.39
Current pain intensity
No anxiety65.17 ± 2.180.200.665
Anxiety104.5 ± 3.26
No insomnia55.90 ± 2.221.210.290
Insomnia114.23 ± 3.03
General pain intensity
No anxiety66.08 ± 2.510.170.683
Anxiety106.55 ± 1.94
No insomnia56.00 ± 2.210.220.647
Insomnia116.54 ± 2.14
Insomnia
No anxiety614.83 ± 5.673.410.086
Anxiety1019.50 ± 4.40
Anxiety
No insomnia56.60 ± 1.8210.800.005
Insomnia1112.27 ± 3.61
Depression
No insomnia59.20 ± 2.952.580.130
Insomnia1111.73 ± 2.90
p values corresponding to significant differences (p < 0.05) or significant trends (0.1 > p ≥ 0.05) between means are in bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mory, L.-N.; de Oliveira Fernandes, D.; Mancini, C.; Mouthon, M.; Chabwine, J.N. The Affective Dimension of Pain Appears to Be Determinant within a Pain–Insomnia–Anxiety Pathological Loop in Fibromyalgia: A Case-Control Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3296. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123296

AMA Style

Mory L-N, de Oliveira Fernandes D, Mancini C, Mouthon M, Chabwine JN. The Affective Dimension of Pain Appears to Be Determinant within a Pain–Insomnia–Anxiety Pathological Loop in Fibromyalgia: A Case-Control Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(12):3296. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mory, Lliure-Naima, Daniel de Oliveira Fernandes, Christian Mancini, Michael Mouthon, and Joelle Nsimire Chabwine. 2022. "The Affective Dimension of Pain Appears to Be Determinant within a Pain–Insomnia–Anxiety Pathological Loop in Fibromyalgia: A Case-Control Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 12: 3296. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123296

APA Style

Mory, L. -N., de Oliveira Fernandes, D., Mancini, C., Mouthon, M., & Chabwine, J. N. (2022). The Affective Dimension of Pain Appears to Be Determinant within a Pain–Insomnia–Anxiety Pathological Loop in Fibromyalgia: A Case-Control Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(12), 3296. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop