Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Donor Site Morbidity and Flap Perfusion Following Radial versus Ulnar Forearm Free Flap—A Randomized Controlled Prospective Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Evolution of Procedure Indication and Cardiovascular Risk in Transvenous Lead Extraction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 13
10.3390/jcm11133594
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cognitive Difficulties and Health-Related Quality of Life in Sarcoidosis: An Analysis of the GRADS Cohort

by
Karin F. Hoth
1,2,
Jacob Simmering
3,
Anna Croghan
1 and
Nabeel Y. Hamzeh
3,*,† on behalf of the GRADS Investigators
1
Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
2
Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
3
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Members of the GRADS Investigators are indicated in the Acknowledgments section.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(13), 3594; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133594
Submission received: 12 April 2022 / Revised: 9 June 2022 / Accepted: 16 June 2022 / Published: 22 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rationale: Subjective cognitive difficulties are common among sarcoidosis patients; however, previous studies have not modeled the link between cognitive difficulties and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Objectives: To determine whether cognitive difficulties are associated with HRQOL in sarcoidosis patients after adjusting for demographics, fatigue, and physical disease severity measures. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the Genomic Research in Alpha-1 antitrypsin Deficiency and Sarcoidosis (GRADS) study data. We examined the association between self-reported cognitive difficulties (Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ)) and HRQOL (SF12v2 mental and physical component scores) while adjusting for the demographics, fatigue, and physical disease severity measures (i.e., organ involvement, forced vital capacity). Results: Approximately one-fourth of the patients with sarcoidosis endorsed cognitive difficulties. More frequent cognitive difficulties and more severe fatigue were significantly associated with worse mental HRQOL in the fully adjusted model, while older age was associated with better mental HRQOL. The association between cognitive difficulties and physical HRQOL was not significant in the final model. More severe fatigue, joint involvement, and reduced forced vital capacity (FVC) were associated with worse physical HRQOL, while higher income and higher education were associated with better physical HRQOL. Conclusions: Perceived cognitive difficulties are associated with diminished HRQOL after adjusting for demographics, organ involvement, pulmonary function, and fatigue. The association between cognitive difficulties and reduced HRQOL primarily occurs through the impact on mental components of HRQOL.

1. Introduction

Sarcoidosis is a multi-systemic inflammatory disease that predominantly involves the lungs and lymph nodes, although any organ can be affected [1]. Symptoms related to sarcoidosis differ across patients and organ involvement but often include cough, fatigue, and shortness of breath, but can also be non-organ specific such as weight loss, pain, and cognitive impairment [1]. Individuals with sarcoidosis are also at increased risk of depression and cognitive complaints [2,3]. The course of disease is variable, with some patients experiencing progression and others resolution of symptoms, adding uncertainty to the impact of the disease on individuals’ lives [1]. Sarcoidosis typically begins in early to middle adulthood, striking at a time of peak occupational productivity and family responsibilities [4].
Previous research has shown that patients with sarcoidosis have a reduced quality of life (QOL) compared to age-matched peers [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Several factors that may impact QOL have been examined, including patients’ demographic characteristics (e.g., female gender [13,14,15], lower income [16]), severity of depressive symptoms and anxiety [9], fatigue [17,18], pain, specific organ involvement [19], and medication effects [20,21]). This research has been chiefly conducted at single centers. Overall, relatively few studies in sarcoidosis have focused on patient-centered clinical outcomes, leading to several recent calls in the literature for more research into the causes of disease burden [22,23]. Identifying potentially modifiable co-morbidities that impact health-related quality of life has not previously been an area of focus but would open new avenues for interventions to improve daily life for patients.
Cognitive difficulties are one set of symptoms that are likely to impact QOL but have not been well-studied in sarcoidosis [22,23,24,25]. Initial research suggests that approximately one-third of patients with sarcoidosis report cognitive problems in their everyday life [24], as measured using the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) [26]. Elfferich and colleagues found that patients with sarcoidosis reported increased cognitive symptoms over the previous five years, greater worry about cognitive symptoms, and greater hindrance from cognitive difficulties in daily life than their peers [24]. Research from the same group observed that high CFQ scores, which reflect patients’ experience of more frequent cognitive errors, were associated with female gender [24], younger age [25], fatigue [24,25], depressive symptoms, and symptoms of small-fiber neuropathy [24], many of the same factors that have been related to poor QOL in the past literature. To date, no study has modeled the potential link between cognitive difficulties and health-related quality of life while considering demographics, fatigue, and indicators of sarcoidosis severity. As such, further research is needed to better understand the extent and complexity of factors impacting health-related quality of life of patients with sarcoidosis [22,23].
The primary goal of the current study was to determine whether cognitive difficulties are associated with reduced HRQOL in patients with sarcoidosis above and beyond that explained by key demographic and clinical characteristics, such as fatigue. We examined the association between cognitive difficulties and HRQOL among the 315 patients with complete data on relevant measures at the GRADS baseline visit. We hypothesized that more frequent cognitive difficulties would be associated with poorer HRQOL. Further, we hypothesized that cognitive difficulties would have a unique, independent association with HRQOL after adjusting for demographic characteristics, fatigue, and severity of sarcoidosis, measured by lung function and type of organ involvement. Finally, we hypothesized that more frequent cognitive difficulties would have a stronger association with the Mental Component of HRQOL than the Physical Component, as measured by the SF-12.

2. Methods

The current study is a secondary analysis of the questionnaires and clinical data collected at the baseline visit of the Genomic Research in Alpha-1 antitrypsin Deficiency and Sarcoidosis (GRADS) study [27]. GRADS was an NIH-sponsored, multi-center, observational cohort study designed to investigate the lung microbiome and genomics of alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency and sarcoidosis [27]. Our study was granted a waiver of consent by the University of Iowa institutional review board, as it was a secondary analysis of de-identified data.
Inclusion criteria for the parent GRADS study required that participants with sarcoidosis be at least 18 years old, diagnosed with sarcoidosis based on the American Thoracic Society (ATS), European Respiratory Society (ERS)/World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous diseases (WASOG) criteria [28], able and willing to undergo GRADS study procedures, and capable of understanding study forms and providing consent [27]. Eligible participants completed self-administered questionnaires regarding their demographics and medical history, fatigue (PROMIS), cognitive difficulties (CFQ), and HRQOL (Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, SF-12v2) [27]. Participants also completed pulmonary function testing including spirometry and diffusion capacity and chest imaging, and each site investigator completed medical questionnaires based on a review of each participants’ medical record to document key aspects of sarcoidosis disease phenotype along with current and past medical treatment. Full details of the GRADS study design have been previously published [27].

3. Measures

Demographic and medical history questionnaires: Participants self-reported their race, age, gender, level of education, income, medical history, and medication use, including current immunosuppressive regimens.
Sarcoidosis disease status and history: Study site investigators completed an organ assessment form (GRADS organ assessment) which was developed by the sarcoidosis protocol committee based on previously published organ assessment tools [29,30].
Spirometry: Pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry and diffusion capacity were obtained at baseline according to the ATS/ERS guidelines [31].
Quality of life: The SF-12v2 was administered as a measure of HRQOL. It is a self-report questionnaire that reflects functional health and well-being. The SF-12 was developed as a shorter alternative to the longer SF-36. The SF-12v2 physical component summary score (PCS) and mental component summary score (MCS) were calculated by the genomic information center for the GRADS study according to standard guidelines. The PSC and MCS range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better HRQOL [32]. The SF-36 has been previously utilized to assess HRQOL in sarcoidosis patients [11]. The Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) was also collected in GRADS but a large number of the FAS questionnaires had missing answers, impairing our ability to calculate a score.
Cognitive difficulties: Perceived cognitive difficulties were measured using the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ), a self-report questionnaire measure that has been utilized in previous sarcoidosis research [24,25]. The CFQ was developed in 1982 [26] and includes 25 items that describe everyday cognitive errors (e.g., forgetting names, failure to notice signposts, confusing left and right). Individuals rate the frequency with which they experience cognitive errors on a 5-point Likert scale from “never” to “very often” [26]. The total scores range between 0 and 100, with higher scores reflecting a report of more frequent cognitive errors in everyday life [26]. The CFQ has been further tested and validated in other cohorts [33,34,35]. To describe our sample, we determined the number of patients who scored above the previously published cutoff for “elevated cognitive deficits” in the past literature of 43 or greater [24]. However, in our primary statistical models, we included the CFQ score as a continuous measure to capture the full variability across the questionnaire.
Fatigue: Ten items from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue databank were used to assess fatigue in the GRADS parent study. PROMIS fatigue items require the participant to rate the frequency of symptoms of fatigue over the past 7 days on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “never” to “always.” Total scores on the PROMIS fatigue measure have a possible range of 10–50, with higher score indicating more fatigue. The 10 items used in the GRADS study are presented in Supplementary Table S1. There are no established clinical cutoffs for the 10-item fatigue questionnaire in patients with sarcoidosis, thus we opted to include the total score as a continuous variable in our analysis.

4. Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics including frequency distribution, median, and interquartile range were used to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample. Our primary analyses utilized ordinary least squares regression modeling to examine the association between cognitive difficulties (as measured by the CFQ) and HRQOL, while adjusting for key demographic and clinical variables selected a priori based on the past literature demonstrating an association with HRQOL. These independent variables included: demographic characteristics (age, gender, race), socio-economic status (education, self-reported income split into four roughly equal groups), fatigue (measured using PROMIS Fatigue total score), and sarcoidosis disease factors. We included dummy variables for organ system involvement for any system with at least 10% prevalence (lung, bone, eye, cardiac, joint, lymphatic), the sum of the other organ systems with less than 10% prevalence, and the FVC percent predicted to describe sarcoidosis severity. We conducted three regression models in total, with HRQOL serving as the dependent variable (SF-12 total score, SF-12 mental component score (MCS) alone, and SF-12 physical (PCS) component score, respectively). Analysis was performed utilizing R foundation for statistical computing (Vienna, Austria).

5. Results

5.1. Patient Characteristics

GRADS recruited 368 patients with sarcoidosis from 9 sarcoidosis centers across the United States [27]. For the current analysis, we excluded participants with incomplete data for the key variables (i.e., demographics, spirometry, SF-12v2, and CFQ), and a consort diagram depicting the sample size is shown in Figure 1. Our final sample consisted of 315 individuals with an average age of 53 years. Slightly over half of the participants were female (54%), with the majority identifying as white (72%) and reporting at least some college education (81%). Demographic and clinical characteristics are detailed in Table 1.
Means, standard deviations (SD), and score distributions for key independent variables (CFQ and PROMIS Fatigue) and HRQOL outcomes (SF-12v2) are presented in Table 1 and Figure 2, respectively. The overall mean ± SD CFQ score for the sample was 34 ± 17, with a median of 33 and interquartile range of 22 to 42. A CFQ score of 43 or more has been defined in past literature as clinically significant perceived cognitive difficulties [24], and 25% of our cohort scored 43 or above. The mean ± SD for the MCS of the SF-12v2 was 47 ± 10, whereas the PCS was 42 ± 11. The total SF-12v2 score (MCS + PCS) was 89 ± 16.

5.2. Association between Cognitive Difficulties and Quality of Life

Overall HRQOL was described using a regression model with SF-12v2 total score as the dependent variable. The overall model was significant (F = 30.4, p < 0.001; see Table 2). There was a statistically significant relationship between CFQ (β = −0.08, p = 0.041) and fatigue (β = −1.02, p < 0.001) and lower overall HRQOL that persisted after adjustment for age, race, education, income, disease severity, and FVC.
The ordinary least squares regression model with mental HRQOL (SF-12v2 MCS) as the dependent variable was significant overall (F = 9.73, p < 0.001; see Table 2). There was a significant association between more frequent cognitive difficulties (β = −0.12, p < 0.001) and fatigue (β = −0.39, p < 0.001) and SF-12v2 MCS after adjusting for all other covariates. Older age was also associated with better mental HRQOL (β = 1.43, p = 0.002).
The regression model with physical HRQOL (SF-12v2 PCS) as the dependent variable was also significant overall (F= 13.9, p < 0.001; see Table 2); however, in contrast with mental QOL, cognitive difficulties was not significantly associated with physical HRQOL in the adjusted model (β = 0.04, p = 0.311). Fatigue remained statistically significantly associated with SF-12v2 PCS (β = −0.63, p < 0.001). Higher income and education levels were associated with higher SF-12v2 PCS scores, while joint involvement and reduced FVC were associated with worse physical HRQOL.
Additional specifications explicitly including medication use, medication type, disease duration, flags for SFN, or neurological involvement found no meaningful changes in the relationship between CFQ and SF-12 overall or in either sub-score.

6. Discussion

The current study highlights the extent and importance of self-reported cognitive difficulties in patients with sarcoidosis. Consistent with prior estimates [24], approximately one quarter of our cohort of 315 patients with sarcoidosis scored above the previously published cutoff for subjective cognitive dysfunction on a commonly used cognitive questionnaire measure (i.e., CFQ of 43 or above) [24]. The primary new finding of the study is that perceived cognitive difficulties are associated with worse HRQOL after adjusting for the effects of demographic characteristics, organ involvement, pulmonary function, and severity of fatigue, which have previously been examined in relation to quality of life in sarcoidosis. The association between cognitive difficulties and worse HRQOL appeared to primarily occur through the impact on mental components of HRQOL (i.e., SF-12v2 MCS), while fatigue was associated with both mental and physical HRQOL items.
Fatigue and subjective cognitive difficulties often co-occur. Prior research has demonstrated an association between both mental and physical fatigue and self-reported cognitive failures in neurosarcoidosis patients [36]. However, fatigue and cognitive impairment are distinct symptom clusters. Fatigue, along with exercise capacity, have also been found to relate to physical QOL in sarcoidosis patients [37]. Notably, the current findings suggest that patients’ perceived cognitive difficulties are independently associated with HRQOL beyond fatigue and other clinical characteristics. Thus, clinicians should ask patients about cognitive symptoms and consider their potential impact on daily functioning. Future research may benefit from including both measures of fatigue and cognitive difficulties to optimally understand patient-reported and clinical outcomes. One previous treatment trial of 343 patients that included questions regarding both fatigue and cognitive concerns showed that patients with sarcoidosis who had a high frequency of cognitive difficulties (i.e., CFQ ≥ 43) also had high fatigue scores, and that both fatigue and perceived cognitive difficulties improved in patients treated with an anti-TNF-α agent [24]. This underscores the potential utility of adding cognitive difficulties as an additional endpoint in clinical trials.
In addition to findings for cognitive difficulties and fatigue, our analyses identified several demographic and clinical characteristics that are associated with HRQOL in our sample. Older age was associated with better mental HRQOL, an observation that is consistent with findings in other chronic pulmonary conditions [38]. Unsurprisingly, poorer pulmonary function measured by FVC percent predicted was associated with worse physical HRQOL. Lower income was also associated with worse physical HRQOL, while education above a bachelor’s degree appeared protective and was related to better physical HRQOL. Lower income associations with reduced HRQOL have been found in other studies [16]. For example, one study analyzing the Sarcoidosis Advanced Registry for Cures database, which was established by the Foundation for Sarcoidosis Research, showed that patients with low income had higher rates of sarcoidosis-related co-morbidities and lower HRQOL based on the Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire [16].

7. Limitations of the Study

It is important to consider our findings in the context of the study’s strengths and limitations. A key strength is that we included a large and diverse sample of patients with sarcoidosis from the GRADS study. GRADS was a multi-center study involving nine centers across the US that recruited a geographically and clinically diverse sample of patients with sarcoidosis with the goal of representing sarcoidosis in the general population. GRADS did not include a control group for comparison, limiting our ability to compare our findings to a control group at this time. Additionally, our approach to considering fatigue and cognitive difficulties together in our model allowed us to examine whether cognitive difficulties accounted for independent variance in HRQOL. Limitations include the fact that the current analysis is retrospective in nature. Additionally, the GRADS parent study was not focused on assessing QOL measures, as potentially relevant data on depression [39,40], anxiety [40], pain [41], and sleep disorders [42] were not collected. In some instances, such as small-fiber neuropathy, data were collected; however, the GRADS criterion for having small-fiber neuropathy was very high and likely to be met through routine clinical practice. Although GRADS was inclusive of a broad phenotype of sarcoidosis, the recruitment and data collection choices limit the generalizability of our findings to the overall sarcoidosis population [27]. Further, using a self-report questionnaire to assess cognitive difficulties captures patients’ perception of function in everyday life but does not objectively assess cognitive skills as with neuropsychological testing. Finally, while the SF-12 is a well-established measure of HRQL, it assesses self-rated mental and physical health and the degree to which health status impacts engagement in various activities rather than life satisfaction. Inclusion of a life satisfaction measure in future studies would be helpful in gaining a more comprehensive appreciation of how QOL is affected in sarcoidosis patients.
Cognitive difficulties in sarcoidosis have primarily been subjectively assessed in past research using self-administered questionnaires and seldom by objective testing [43]. It is well-established in the behavioral neuroscience literature that subjective cognitive complaints are only modestly related to objective cognitive defects due in part to co-morbid conditions such as depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, and medication side effects, which can complicate the overall assessment and management of cognitive impairment in sarcoidosis. Self-report about perceived cognitive complaints does not provide the same information as objective assessment. As reported by Hendriks and colleagues, a pilot study examining subjective and objective cognitive functioning in a limited sample of sarcoidosis patients (n = 27) found that self-reported cognitive failures did not significantly relate to performance on objective neuropsychological measures [25]. Perception is based on expectations and, in part, is often associated with other symptoms such as depression. Nonetheless, in some other chronic medical conditions, patient reports of cognitive difficulties have been associated with subsequent development of impairment, and perceived difficulty itself is associated with a loss of function [44]. Longitudinal data including both measures of perceived deficits and objective performance will be needed to determine if this is also true in sarcoidosis. Objective assessment of cognition in future research will be important; however, comprehensive cognitive evaluation is time-consuming and typically cannot be accomplished within the time boundaries of a normal clinic visit. Thus, new efficient assessment tools are also needed to aid physicians in identifying and quantifying cognitive deficits in sarcoidosis and to understand the contribution of co-morbid conditions to these symptoms. Ultimately, clinical management of cognitive difficulties will require a multi-modal, multi-disciplinary approach. Finally, the etiology of cognitive difficulties in sarcoidosis is not well-understood. Further work to identify the underlying biological mechanisms of cognitive impairment is needed.

8. Summary

In summary, our study suggests that cognitive difficulties are associated with HRQOL in patients with sarcoidosis after adjusting for important demographic and clinical factors. Perceived cognitive difficulties are associated with diminished HRQOL after adjusting for demographics, organ involvement, pulmonary function, and fatigue. The association between cognitive difficulties and reduced HRQOL primarily occurs through the impact on mental components of HRQOL. Future studies that include measures of perceived difficulties, measures of other relevant factors such as pain and depression, and objective cognitive performance are needed. Examining the relationship between cognitive dysfunction and co-morbid conditions using physiological measures to identify potential mechanisms will move the field toward the study of targeted interventions.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11133594/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.F.H. and N.Y.H.; Data curation, J.S.; Formal analysis, J.S.; Investigation, N.Y.H.; Methodology, K.F.H., J.S. and N.Y.H.; Project administration, N.Y.H.; Visualization, J.S. and A.C.; Writing—original draft, K.F.H. and N.Y.H.; Writing—review & editing, K.F.H., J.S., A.C. and N.Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Institute of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, U01HL112707 and U01HL112695, “Genomic Research in Alpha-1 antitrypsin Deficiency and Sarcoidosis (GRADS) study”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Our study was granted a waiver of consent by the University of Iowa institutional review board, as it was a secondary analysis of de-identified data.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was waived for this study as it is a secondary analysis of pre-existing data.

Acknowledgments

Members of the GRADS Investigators are: Study Chair: Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University: Robert M. Senior. Clinical Centers: Arizona Health Sciences Center: Cristine Berry, Nancy Casanova, Joe Garcia, James Knepler, Jr., Kenneth Knox, Jorge Navarrete and Isabel Oliva. Johns Hopkins University: Linda Breslin, Edward Chen, David Moller, Rebecca Robinson, and Zhimin Song. Medical University of South Carolina: Rahul Argula, Tatsiana Beiko, Mary Brooks, Kimberly Brown, Yaser Dawod, Shalini Kanukala, Luca Paoletti, Richard Rissmiller, Lynn Schnapp, Charlie Strange, Danielle Woodford and Deirdre Walker. National Jewish Health: Gina Atnes, Briana Barkes, Russell Bowler, Jill Elliott, May Gillespie, Nabeel Hamzeh, Li Li, Kristyn MacPhail, Lisa Maier, Peggy Mroz, Robert Sandhaus and Lori Silveira. University of California, San Francisco: Nirav Bhakta, Melissa Ho, Laura L. Koth, Joris Ramstein, Sara Sun and Prescott Woodruff. University of Illinois, Chicago: Nadera Sweiss. University of Pennsylvania: Deborah Arnold, Eduardo Barbosa, Frederic Bushman, Ronald Collman, Ayannah Fitzgerald, Lisa Gardo, Ize Imai, Maryl Kreider, Karen Patterson, Tamyra Riggs and Milton Rossman. University of Pittsburgh: Stephen Bruno, Kevin Gibson and Yingze Zhang. Vanderbilt University: Wonder Drake. Yale School of Medicine: Percy Adonteng-Boateng, Donna Carrano, Mridu Gulati and Erica Herzog. Genomics and Informatics Centers: New York University: Elodie Ghedin. J. Craig Venter Institute: Barbara Methe. University of Pittsburgh: G. K. Balasubramani, Michael Becich, Rebecca Boes, Kevin Gibson, Jennifer Haverty, Harry Hochheiser, Naftali Kaminski, Joseph K. Leader, Melody Macey-Kalcevic, Jeff Martin, Mary Martinez, Alison Morris, Scott O’Neal, Nancy Petro, Darina Protivnak, Frank Sciurba, Bill Shirey, Laurie Silfies, Mary Tranchine, Stephen Wisniewski and Yingze Zhang. Medical University of South Carolina: Charlie Strange. Vanderbilt University: Wonder Drake. Yale University: Heather Lynn, Naftali Kaminski. NHLBI: Kevin J. Heath, Timothy M. Moore. (Observational Study Monitoring Board Executive Secretary); Antonello Punturieri and Lisa M. Viviano.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

HRQOLHealth-related quality of life
CFQCognitive Failures Questionnaire
GRADSGenomic Research in Alpha-1 anti-trypsin Deficiency and Sarcoidosis
NIHNational Institute of Health
ATSAmerican Thoracic Society
ERSEuropean Respiratory Society
WASOGWorld Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous diseases
SF-12v2Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey version 2
PCSPhysical Component Score
MCSMental Component Score
PFTPulmonary function test
FVCForced Vital Capacity
DLCODiffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide
TNF-αTumor necrosis factor alpha

References

  1. Crouser, E.D.; Maier, L.A.; Wilson, K.C.; Bonham, C.A.; Morgenthau, A.S.; Patterson, K.C.; Abston, E.; Bernstein, R.C.; Blankstein, R.; Chen, E.S.; et al. Diagnosis and detection of sarcoidosis. An official american thoracic society clinical practice guideline. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 201, e26–e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Korsten, P.; Drent, M. Multisystemic manifestations of sarcoidosis and comorbidities. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2018, 24, 477–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Drent, M.; Strookappe, B.; Hoitsma, E.; De Vries, J. Consequences of Sarcoidosis. Clin. Chest Med. 2015, 36, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Erdal, B.S.; Clymer, B.D.; Yildiz, V.O.; Julian, M.W.; Crouser, E.D. Unexpectedly high prevalence of sarcoidosis in a representative U.S. Metropolitan population. Respir. Med. 2012, 106, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. De Vries, J.; Drent, M. Quality of life and health status in sarcoidosis: A review. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007, 28, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. De Vries, J.; Drent, M. Quality of life and health status in sarcoidosis: A review of the literature. Clin. Chest Med. 2008, 29, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Victorson, D.E.; Cella, D.; Grund, H.; Judson, M.A. A conceptual model of health-related quality of life in sarcoidosis. Qual. Life Res. 2014, 23, 89–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Victorson, D.E.; Cella, D.; Judson, M.A. Quality of life evaluation in sarcoidosis: Current status and future directions. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2008, 14, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goracci, A.; Fagiolini, A.; Martinucci, M.; Calossi, S.; Rossi, S.; Santomauro, T.; Mazzi, A.; Penza, F.; Fossi, A.; Bargagli, E.; et al. Quality of life, anxiety and depression in sarcoidosis. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2008, 30, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Korenromp, I.H.; van de Laar, M.A. Health-related quality of life in sarcoidosis. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2014, 20, 503–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Judson, M.A. Quality of life assessment in sarcoidosis. Clin. Chest Med. 2015, 36, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Judson, M.A. Quality of life in sarcoidosis. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 38, 546–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bourbonnais, J.M.; Samavati, L. Effect of gender on health related quality of life in sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffus. Lung Dis. 2010, 27, 96–102. [Google Scholar]
  14. De Vries, J.; Van Heck, G.L.; Drent, M. Gender differences in sarcoidosis: Symptoms, quality of life, and medical consumption. Women Health 1999, 30, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Dudvarski-Ilic, A.; Mihailovic-Vucinic, V.; Gvozdenovic, B.; Zugic, V.; Milenkovic, B.; Ilic, V. Health related quality of life regarding to gender in sarcoidosis. Coll. Antropol. 2009, 33, 837–840. [Google Scholar]
  16. Harper, L.J.; Gerke, A.K.; Wang, X.F.; Ribeiro Neto, M.L.; Baughman, R.P.; Beyer, K.; Drent, M.; Judson, M.A.; Maier, L.A.; Serchuck, L.; et al. Income and other contributors to poor outcomes in U.S. patients with sarcoidosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 201, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jastrzębski, D.; Ziora, D.; Lubecki, M.; Zieleźnik, K.; Maksymiak, M.; Hanzel, J.; Początek, A.; Kolczyńska, A.; Nguyen Thi, L.; Zebrowska, A.; et al. Fatigue in sarcoidosis and exercise tolerance, dyspnea, and quality of life. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2015, 833, 31–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Michielsen, H.J.; Drent, M.; Peros-Golubicic, T.; De Vries, J. Fatigue is associated with quality of life in sarcoidosis patients. Chest 2006, 130, 989–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Saligan, L.N.; Levy-Clarke, G.; Wu, T.; Faia, L.J.; Wroblewski, K.; Yeh, S.; Nussenblatt, R.B.; Sen, H.N. Quality of life in sarcoidosis: Comparing the impact of ocular and non-ocular involvement of the disease. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010, 17, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Judson, M.A.; Chaudhry, H.; Louis, A.; Lee, K.; Yucel, R. The effect of corticosteroids on quality of life in a sarcoidosis clinic: The results of a propensity analysis. Respir. Med. 2015, 109, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Vis, R.; van de Garde, E.M.W.; Grutters, J.C.; Korenromp, I.H.E. The effects of pharmacological interventions on quality of life and fatigue in sarcoidosis: A systematic review. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2020, 29, 190057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Maier, L.A.; Crouser, E.D.; Martin, W.J., 2nd; Eu, J. Executive summary of the NHLBI workshop report: Leveraging current scientific advancements to understand sarcoidosis variability and improve outcomes. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2017, 14 (Suppl. 6), S415–S420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gerke, A.K.; Judson, M.A.; Cozier, Y.C.; Culver, D.A.; Koth, L.L. Disease burden and variability in sarcoidosis. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2017, 14 (Suppl. 6), S421–S428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Elfferich, M.D.; Nelemans, P.J.; Ponds, R.W.; De Vries, J.; Wijnen, P.A.; Drent, M. Everyday cognitive failure in sarcoidosis: The prevalence and the effect of anti-TNF-alpha treatment. Respir. Int. Rev. Thorac. Dis. 2010, 80, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hendriks, C.; Drent, M.; De Kleijn, W.; Elfferich, M.; Wijnen, P.; De Vries, J. Everyday cognitive failure and depressive symptoms predict fatigue in sarcoidosis: A prospective follow-up study. Respir. Med. 2018, 138s, S24–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Broadbent, D.E.; Cooper, P.F.; FitzGerald, P.; Parkes, K.R. The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br. J. Clin. Psychol. 1982, 21, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Strange, C.; Senior, R.M.; Sciurba, F.; O’Neal, S.; Morris, A.; Wisniewski, S.R.; Bowler, R.; Hochheiser, H.S.; Becich, M.J.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Rationale and design of the genomic research in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency and Sarcoidosis (GRADS) study. Sarcoidosis Protocol. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2015, 12, 1561–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Statement on sarcoidosis: Joint Statement of the American Thoracic Society (ATS), the European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders (WASOG) adopted by the ATS Board of Directors and by the ERS Executive Committee, February 1999. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1999, 160, 736–755. [CrossRef]
  29. Baughman, R.P.; Teirstein, A.S.; Judson, M.A.; Rossman, M.D.; Yeager, H., Jr.; Bresnitz, E.A.; DePalo, L.; Hunninghake, G.; Iannuzzi, M.C.; Johns, C.J.; et al. Clinical characteristics of patients in a case control study of sarcoidosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001, 164 Pt 1, 1885–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Judson, M.A.; Costabel, U.; Drent, M.; Wells, A.; Maier, L.; Koth, L.; Shigemitsu, H.; Culver, D.A.; Gelfand, J.; Valeyre, D.; et al. The WASOG sarcoidosis organ assessment instrument: An update of a previous clinical tool. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffus. Lung Dis. 2014, 31, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  31. Miller, M.R.; Crapo, R.; Hankinson, J.; Brusasco, V.; Burgos, F.; Casaburi, R.; Coates, A.; Enright, P.; van der Grinten, C.P.; Gustafsson, P.; et al. General considerations for lung function testing. Eur. Respir. J. 2005, 26, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Hanmer, J.; Kaplan, R.M. Update to the report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for five health-related quality-of-life scores. Value Health 2016, 19, 1059–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wallace, J.C.; Kass, S.J.; Stanny, C.J. The cognitive failures questionnaire revisited: Dimensions and correlates. J. Gen. Psychol. 2002, 129, 238–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rast, P.; Zimprich, D.; Van Boxtel, M.; Jolles, J. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the cognitive failures questionnaire across the adult life span. Assessment 2009, 16, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bridger, R.S.; Johnsen, S.Å.K.; Brasher, K. Psychometric properties of the cognitive failures questionnaire†. Ergonomics 2013, 56, 1515–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Voortman, M.; De Vries, J.; Hendriks, C.M.R.; Elfferich, M.D.P.; Wijnen, P.; Drent, M. Everyday cognitive failure in patients suffering from neurosarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffus. Lung Dis. 2019, 36, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Drent, M.; Marcellis, R.; Lenssen, A.; De Vries, J. Association between physical functions and quality of life in sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc. Diffus. Lung Dis. 2014, 31, 117–128. [Google Scholar]
  38. Martinez, C.H.; Diaz, A.A.; Parulekar, A.D.; Rennard, S.I.; Kanner, R.E.; Hansel, N.N.; Couper, D.; Holm, K.E.; Hoth, K.F.; Curtis, J.L.; et al. Age-related differences in health-related quality of life in COPD: An analysis of the COPDGene and SPIROMICS Cohorts. Chest 2016, 149, 927–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Perini, G.; Cotta Ramusino, M.; Sinforiani, E.; Bernini, S.; Petrachi, R.; Costa, A. Cognitive impairment in depression: Recent advances and novel treatments. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2019, 15, 1249–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Castaneda, A.E.; Tuulio-Henriksson, A.; Marttunen, M.; Suvisaari, J.; Lonnqvist, J. A review on cognitive impairments in depressive and anxiety disorders with a focus on young adults. J. Affect. Disord. 2008, 106, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Higgins, D.M.; Martin, A.M.; Baker, D.G.; Vasterling, J.J.; Risbrough, V. The relationship between chronic pain and neurocognitive function: A systematic review. Clin. J. Pain 2018, 34, 262–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Spira, A.P.; Chen-Edinboro, L.P.; Wu, M.N.; Yaffe, K. Impact of sleep on the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 2014, 27, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. de Kleijn, W.P.; De Vries, J.; Lower, E.E.; Elfferich, M.D.; Baughman, R.P.; Drent, M. Fatigue in sarcoidosis: A systematic review. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2009, 15, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Haley, A.P.; Hoth, K.F.; Gunstad, J.; Paul, R.H.; Jefferson, A.L.; Tate, D.F.; Ono, M.; Jerskey, B.A.; Poppas, A.; Sweet, L.H.; et al. Subjective cognitive complaints relate to white matter hyperintensities and future cognitive decline in patients with cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2009, 17, 976–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jcm 11 03594 g001 550
Figure 1. Consort diagram of GRADS participants included in the current analysis based on available data.
Figure 1. Consort diagram of GRADS participants included in the current analysis based on available data.
Jcm 11 03594 g001
Jcm 11 03594 g002 550
Figure 2. Distribution of SF-12v2, CFQ, and PROMIS Fatigue scores for the entire sample (n = 315).
Figure 2. Distribution of SF-12v2, CFQ, and PROMIS Fatigue scores for the entire sample (n = 315).
Jcm 11 03594 g002
Table
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample (n = 315).
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the sample (n = 315).
Mean (SD) or n (%)
Demographics
Age (years)53 (10)
Gender (female)169 (54%)
Education
 High School or Less59 (19%)
 Some College to Associates Degree110 (35%)
 Bachelor’s Degree or More146 (46%)
Race
 White228 (72%)
 Black75 (24%)
 Other12 (3.8%)
Income (in US dollars)
 0 to 49,99996 (30%)
 50,000 to 99,99991 (29%)
 100,000 to 149,99963 (20%)
 150,000 or more65 (21%)
Clinical Characteristics
Disease duration (years from diagnosis to enrollment) *5 (2, 12)
Sarcoidosis organ involvement by physician rating
 Lung involvement (Yes)307 (97%)
 Skin involvement (Yes)83 (26%)
 Eye involvement (Yes)55 (17%)
 Cardiac involvement (Yes)60 (19%)
 Joint involvement (Yes)56 (18%)
 Lymph involvement (Yes)53 (17%)
 Liver involvement (Yes)28 (8%)
 Ear, nose, and throat involvement (Yes)27 (9%)
 Glandular involvement (Yes)27 (9%)
 Neurological involvement (Yes)21 (7%)
 Bone involvement (Yes)13 (4%)
 Renal involvement (Yes)9 (3%)
 Small fiber neuropathy (Yes)11 (4%)
Number of Organ Systems Affected 2.4 (1.5)
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) % predicted87 (18)
Diffusion Capacity for Carbon monoxide (DLCO) % predicted79 (26)
Scadding Stage (0/I/II/III/IV/missing)38/62/93/45/76/1
Medication treatment
 Current treatment with steroid-sparing agents72 (23%)
 Current treatment with prednisone84 (27%)
 Current treatment with anti-TNF-alpha14 (5%)
 Current treatment with other immunosuppressants39 (12%)
Questionnaire Measures
Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) Total Score34 (17)
CFQ Score ≥ 4378 (25%)
PROMIS Fatigue Total Score28 (10)
SF-12v2
 Total Score89 (16)
 Mental Component Score (MCS)47 (10)
 Physical Component Score (PCS)42 (11)
SF-12 = Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, PROMIS: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. * Median and interquartile ranges were used to describe duration of disease due to a large skew when using mean and standard deviation.
Table
Table 2. Associations between demographic and clincial variables and health-related quality of life subscales (SF-12 MCS and PCS): results of linear regression analyses (N = 315).
Table 2. Associations between demographic and clincial variables and health-related quality of life subscales (SF-12 MCS and PCS): results of linear regression analyses (N = 315).
Predictor VariableSF-12 Total Score
Overall Model: F = 30.4, p < 0.001		SF-12 Mental Component Score
Overall Model: F = 9.7, p < 0.001		SF-12 Physical Component Score
Overall Model: F = 13.9, p < 0.001
Unstand. bβSEpUnstand. bβSEpUnstand. bβSEp
Cognitive Difficulties (CFQ Score)−0.08−0.090.040.041−0.12−0.210.03<0.0010.040.050.040.311
Fatigue
(PROMIS Score)		−1.02−0.670.06<0.001−0.39−0.420.05<0.001−0.63−0.570.06<0.001
Age (per decade)0.850.050.560.1291.430.150.460.002−0.58−0.050.510.256
Female Gender1.220.041.130.2810.760.040.940.4170.460.021.030.654
Race
 WhiteReferenceReferenceReference
 Black−2.27−0.061.390.105−0.040.001.150.970−2.23−0.081.270.080
 Other1.730.022.830.5422.000.042.340.393−0.280.002.570.915
Income
 0 to 49,999ReferenceReferenceReference
 50,000 to 99,9991.490.041.460.308−1.14−0.051.210.3462.630.111.320.048
 100,000 to 149,9993.930.101.680.0201.270.051.390.3632.670.091.530.082
 150,000 or more3.550.091.820.053−0.89−0.041.510.5544.440.161.660.008
Education
 High School or LessReferenceReferenceReference
 Some College to Associates1.840.061.560.2381.150.061.290.3740.690.031.420.625
 Bachelor’s Degree or More4.230.141.620.0091.090.061.340.4153.140.141.470.033
Presence of Lung Involvement1.790.023.410.600−0.050.002.820.9861.840.033.100.553
Presence of Bone Involvement0.850.013.050.780−1.21−0.032.520.6322.060.042.770.458
Presence of Eye Involvement0.420.011.550.788−0.43−0.021.290.7360.850.031.410.547
Presence of Cardiac Involvement−0.070.001.370.9600.740.031.140.516−0.81−0.031.250.518
Presence of Joint Involvement−2.10−0.051.490.1610.910.041.240.462−3.01−0.101.360.027
Presence of Lymph Involvement−1.76−0.041.510.246−0.70−0.031.250.575−1.06−0.031.380.443
Number of Organ Systems Affected−0.98−0.040.940.300−0.29−0.020.780.709−0.69−0.040.860.422
FVC % Predicted (per 10%)0.980.110.320.002−0.08−0.020.260.7551.060.170.29<0.001
Bold font indicates p < 0.05. FVC = Forced Vital Capacity, CFQ = Cognitive Failures Questionnaire, SF-12 = Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, MCS = Mental Component Score.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoth, K.F.; Simmering, J.; Croghan, A.; Hamzeh, N.Y., on behalf of the GRADS Investigators. Cognitive Difficulties and Health-Related Quality of Life in Sarcoidosis: An Analysis of the GRADS Cohort. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3594. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133594

AMA Style

Hoth KF, Simmering J, Croghan A, Hamzeh NY on behalf of the GRADS Investigators. Cognitive Difficulties and Health-Related Quality of Life in Sarcoidosis: An Analysis of the GRADS Cohort. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(13):3594. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133594

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoth, Karin F., Jacob Simmering, Anna Croghan, and Nabeel Y. Hamzeh on behalf of the GRADS Investigators. 2022. "Cognitive Difficulties and Health-Related Quality of Life in Sarcoidosis: An Analysis of the GRADS Cohort" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 13: 3594. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133594

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop