Next Article in Journal
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as New Therapeutic Avenue for Human Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking among Professionally Active Adult Population in Poland and Its Strong Relationship with Cardiovascular Co-Morbidities-POL-O-CARIA 2021 Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

RWT/SaVR—A Simple and Highly Accurate Measure Screening for Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(14), 4120; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144120
by Elsa Arnberg 1,*, Per Eldhagen 2, Viktor Löfbacka 1, Ashwin Venkateshvaran 2, Björn Pilebro 3 and Per Lindqvist 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(14), 4120; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144120
Submission received: 21 June 2022 / Revised: 8 July 2022 / Accepted: 13 July 2022 / Published: 15 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please refer to the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The work is well written. The authors identify a new parameter capable of differentiating  cardiac amyloidosis from other forms of left ventricular hypertrophy. Unfortunately I think that this parameter (RWT/SaVR) is surpassed by other parameters  assessed  by cardiac magnetic resonance in other recently published studies. Parameters such as LVEF / LV mass ratio, LVEF / GLS ratio have recently been evaluated in identifying patients with cardiac amyloidosis. The authors could cite these articles. Authors  could also mention the recently proposed multiparametric echocardiographic score (IWT score) in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Furthermore, it would be advisable to increase the limits section of the study specifying why other echocardiographic parameters already validated to differentiate cardiac amyloidosis from other types of hypertrophy were not evaluated.

Author Response

Please see the attachment. 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for your prompt revision according to the comments. Although some limitations such as either RWT/SaVR has the same discriminating power in the patients with lesser LV wall thickness (<14 mm) are still remained but your work could give a clinical message by suggesting a simplified tool for screening the patients with thickened LV wall. For some of the limitations mentioned in the first review, please let us know the results in a good paper through additional research currently in progress.

Reviewer 2 Report

no further comments

Back to TopTop