Next Article in Journal
Use of Melatonin and/on Ramelteon for the Treatment of Insomnia in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Validation of a Novel Patient Specific CT-Morphometric Technique for Quantifying Bone Graft Resorption Following the Latarjet Procedure
Previous Article in Journal
Structure-Function Relationship in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa and Hyperautofluorescent Rings
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparison of Central Screw versus Post for Glenoid Baseplate Fixation in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Lateralized Glenoid Design
 
 
Commentary
Peer-Review Record

Advances in the Non-Operative Management of Multidirectional Instability of the Glenohumeral Joint

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(17), 5140; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175140
by Lyn Watson 1, Tania Pizzari 2,3, Simon Balster 1, Ross Lenssen 1 and Sarah Ann Warby 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(17), 5140; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175140
Submission received: 27 July 2022 / Revised: 26 August 2022 / Accepted: 28 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Shoulder Surgery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

A brief summary

The aim of this paper was to provide a new approach to MDI non-operative management. The authors have successfully presented a large amount of important information regarding the treatment for MDI, through the shoulder muscle rehabilitation program, including valuable information about the WIP updates.

General concept comments

From the aetiology and classification to clinical presentation and treatment, the paper is appropriate and clearly describes all the data. The pictures used for the evaluation and rehabilitation program are adequate and helpful.

The manuscript is highly relevant to the field of orthopaedic rehabilitation.

Still, less than half of the cited references are published within the last five years. I also suggest reviewing the reference list and completing the date of publishing for a few articles where the year is missing.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is a reminder of authors papers from prevoius years.Is not presented a group of patients,with different etiology for MDI,and compare the results according the scale presented after 12,18 and 24 weeks.The results is not relevant if that groups are not made.Is jus a presentation of the procedures.

And in the bibliography should have at least 50 procents after 2015 and is not the case in this paper.

Author Response

"Please see the attachment."

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop