Does Bicanalicular Intubation Improve the Outcome of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy?
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author | Year | No of Pts (Eyes) | Succes Rate with Tube | Succes Rate without Tube | p Value | Tube Removed * | Follow-Up * |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Smirnov et al. [13] | 2008 | 46 | 18/23 (78.2%) | 23/23 (100%) | p < 0.049 | 2 | 6 |
Harugop et al. [9] | 2008 | 290 | 48/50 (96%) | 224/240 (93.3%) | p = 0.4317 | 3 | 16 |
Unlu et al. [11] | 2009 | 38 | 16/19 (84.2%) | 18/19 (94.7) | p = 0.123 | 2 | 100 |
Al-Qahtani et al. [2] | 2012 | 173 | 89/92 (96.7%) | 73/81 (90.1%) | p = 0.117 | 4 | 12 |
Yeon et al. [10] | 2012 | 36 (41) | 5/6 (83%) | 14/15 (93.3%) | p = 0.50 | 1 | 9 |
Chong et al. [8] | 2013 | 118 (128) | 61/63 (96.3%) | 62/65 (95.3%) | p = 0.79 | 2 | 12 |
Shashidhar et al. [18] | 2014 | 57 (62) | 30/32 (93.7%) | 26/30 (86.6%) | p = 0.4810 | 1.5 | 6 |
Reddy et al. [17] | 2015 | 20 | 9/10 (90%) | 8/10 (80%) | 1.5 | 6 | |
Longari et al. [14] | 2016 | 99 | 45 (82.2%) | 44 (88.6%) | p > 0.05 | 2 | 18 |
Rao et al. [16] | 2016 | 50 | 23/25 (92%) | 21/25 (84%) | p > 0.05 | 3 | 6 |
Fayers et al. [15] | 2016 | 300 | 144/152 (94.7%) | 130/148 (87.8%) | p = 0.034 | 3 | 12 |
Matoušek et al. (this paper) | 2022 | 30 | 13/15 (86.6%) | 14/15 (93.3%) | p = 0.483 | 3 | 6 |
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- ZhaoWei, G.; ZhiWei, C. Silicone Intubation and Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Meta-Analysis. J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2010, 6, 710–713. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Qahtani, A.S. Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tubing: A prospective randomized study. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2012, 4, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vinciguerra, A.; Nonis, A.; Resti, A.G.; Bussi, M.; Trimarchi, M. Best treatments available for distal acquired lacrimal obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2020, 45, 545–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, M.G.; Shim, W.S.; Shin, D.K.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, J.E.; Jung, H.J. A Systematic Review of Benefit of Silicone Intubation in EDCR. Clin. Exp. Otorhinolaryngol. 2018, 2, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tai, E.L.M.; Kueh, Y.C.; Abdullah, B. The Use of Stents in Children with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Requiring Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 3, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Komínek, P.; Červenka, S.; Matoušek, P.; Pniak, T.; Zeleník, K. Primary pediatric endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy—A review of 58 procedures. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2010, 6, 661–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Komínek, P.; Červenka, S. Pediatric endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy—A report of 34 Cases. Laryngoscope 2005, 10, 1800–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chong, K.K.; Lai, F.H.; Ho, M.; Luk, A.; Wong, B.W.; Young, A. Randomized trial on silicone intubation in endoscopic mechanical dacryocystorhinostomy (SEND) for primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 10, 2139–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Harugop, A.S.; Mudhol, R.S.; Rekha, B.K.; Maheswaran, M. Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: A prospective study. Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2008, 4, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yeon, J.Y.; Shim, W.S. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without silicone stent. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012, 1, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Unlu, H.H.; Gunhan, K.; Baser, E.F.; Songu, M. Long-term results in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: Is intubation really required? Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2009, 4, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kakkar, V.; Chugh, J.; Sachdeva, S.; Sharma, N.; Ramesh. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stent: A comparative study. Int. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2008, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Smirnov, G.; Tuomilehto, H.; Teräsvirta, M.; Nuutinen, J.; Seppä, J. Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: A prospective randomized study. Am. J. Rhinol. 2008, 2, 214–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Longari, F.; Dehgani Mobaraki, P.; Ricci, A.L.; Lapenna, R.; Cagini, C.; Ricci, G. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation: 4 years retrospective study. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2016, 273, 2079–2084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fayers, T.; Dolman, P.J. Bicanalicular silicone stents in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2016, 10, 2255–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, S.V.; Rajshekar, M.M. Dacryocystorhinostomy stent insertion in initial endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Clin. Rhinol Int. J. 2016, 3, 120–124. [Google Scholar]
- Reddy, Y.J.; Reddy, Y.M.; Kiran, M.; Reddy, Y.G.; Kumar, S. A comparative study of outcomes of dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stenting. J. Dent. Med. Sci. 2015, 7, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shashidhar, K.C.; Nagalotimath, U.S.; Dixit, D. Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone stenting: A comparative study. Al Ameen J. Med. Sci. 2014, 3, 244–247. [Google Scholar]
- Kashkouli, M.B.; Mirzajani, H.; Jamshidian-Tehrani, M.; Pakdel, F.; Nojomi, M.; Aghaei, G.H. Reliability of fluorescein dye disappearance test in assessment of adults with nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2013, 29, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vinciguerra, A.; Nonis, A.; Resti, A.G.; Bussi, M.; Trimarchi, M. Impact of post-surgical therapies on endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2020, 34, 846–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Outcome | Group I EDCR without Tube (15 Cases) | Group II EDCR with Tube (15 Cases) |
---|---|---|
Success | 13 (86.67%) | 14 (93.33%) |
Failure | 2 (13.33%) | 1 (6.67%) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Matoušek, P.; Lubojacký, J.; Masárová, M.; Čábalová, L.; Červenka, S.; Komínek, P. Does Bicanalicular Intubation Improve the Outcome of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy? J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5387. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185387
Matoušek P, Lubojacký J, Masárová M, Čábalová L, Červenka S, Komínek P. Does Bicanalicular Intubation Improve the Outcome of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(18):5387. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185387
Chicago/Turabian StyleMatoušek, Petr, Jakub Lubojacký, Michaela Masárová, Lenka Čábalová, Stanislav Červenka, and Pavel Komínek. 2022. "Does Bicanalicular Intubation Improve the Outcome of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 18: 5387. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11185387