Next Article in Journal
Clinical Differences and Outcomes of COVID-19 Associated Pulmonary Thromboembolism in Comparison with Non-COVID-19 Pulmonary Thromboembolism
Previous Article in Journal
Special Issue: “10th Anniversary of JCM—Recent Diagnostic and Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology and Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine”
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Strengthening Peer Mentoring Relationships for New Mothers: A Qualitative Analysis

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(20), 6009; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206009
by Kwok Hong Law 1,2,*, Ben Jackson 2,3, Xuan Hui Tan 4, Samantha Teague 1, Amanda Krause 1,2, Kaila Putter 1, Monique Du’cane 1, Lisa Gibson 2,3, Kelby F. Bulles 5, Jennifer Barkin 5 and James A. Dimmock 1,2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(20), 6009; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206009
Submission received: 26 August 2022 / Revised: 8 October 2022 / Accepted: 10 October 2022 / Published: 12 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Mental Health)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a well-written report of qualitative findings regarding factors associated with strong peer mentoring relationships for new mothers. It will be a helpful contribution to the field for peer-delivered services and to inform future research. I had a few minor questions/suggestions for improvement or clarification: 

- The sample size was quite small and I don't see reporting of demographics - how homogenous was the sample? how was sample recruited for Mummy Buddy Program, and what % of those participants provided these qualitative interviews? 

- It seems a bit questionable to reach data saturation with such a small sample - good that you justify for pragmatic reasons; was it saturation, or pragmatic reasons? 

- if you did 3 interviews for each participant over time, did you see anything about change in themes over time? 

- Were there differences in themes between mentors and mentees? If not, I'd report that...

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop