Next Article in Journal
Pregnancy Outcomes in Double Stimulation versus Two Consecutive Mild Stimulations for IVF in Poor Ovarian Responders
Previous Article in Journal
A Retrospective Assessment of Laboratory Findings and Cytokine Markers in Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Patients of Roma Population
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Traumatic Proximal Femoral Fractures during COVID-19 Pandemic in the US: An ACS NSQIP® Analysis

1
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA
2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(22), 6778; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226778
Submission received: 8 October 2022 / Revised: 6 November 2022 / Accepted: 12 November 2022 / Published: 16 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)

Abstract

:
In order to determine the impact of COVID-19 on the treatment and outcomes in patients with proximal femoral fracture’s (PFF), we analyzed a national US sample. This is a retrospective review of American College of Surgery’s (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) for patients with proximal femoral fractures. A total of 26,830 and 26,300 patients sustaining PFF and undergoing surgical treatment were sampled during 2019 and 2020, respectively. On multivariable logistic regression, patients were less likely to have ‘presence of non-healing wound’ (p < 0.001), functional status ‘independent’ (p = 0.012), undergo surgical procedures of ‘hemiarthroplasty’(p = 0.002) and ‘ORIF IT, Peritroch, Subtroch with plates and screws’ (p < 0.001) and to be ‘alive at 30-days post-op’ (p = 0.001) in 2020 as compared to 2019. Patients were more likely to have a case status ‘emergent’, ‘loss of ≥10% body weight’, discharge destination of ‘home’ (p < 0.001 for each) or ‘leaving against medical advice’ (p = 0.026), postoperative ‘acute renal failure (ARF)’ (p = 0.011), ‘myocardial infarction (MI)’ (p = 0.006), ‘pulmonary embolism (PE)’ (p = 0.047), and ‘deep venous thrombosis (DVT)’ (p = 0.049) in 2020 as compared to 2019. Patients sustaining PFF and undergoing surgical treatment during pandemic year 2020 differed significantly in preoperative characteristics and 30-day postoperative complications when compared to patients from the previous year.

1. Introduction

The first case of COVID-19 was diagnosed on 20 January 2020 in Washington State in the U.S. [1]. Shortly thereafter, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic on 11 March 2020 [1]. The effect of COVID-19 pandemic on the health care system in the U.S. has been unprecedented. The Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced delays for all non-essential medical, surgical, and dental procedures during COVID-19 outbreak on 18 March 2020 at the White House Task Force press briefing [2].
Surgical treatment of a hip fracture is typically thought of as an urgent procedure. Delay in hip fracture care has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality [3,4,5]. However, providing timely care to patients with hip fractures during COVID-19 was fraught with multiple challenges for the strained U.S. healthcare system. One of the challenges was the diversion of logistic and personnel resources resulting in potential delays in surgery.
There have been multiple recent publications from around the world, attempting to explore the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on hip fracture care. These include the single center review of medical records [6,7,8,9,10], review of national claims databases [11,12], meta-analyses [13,14] and national database [15,16,17] consortium data reviews [18,19,20]. There have been multiple reports of higher early mortality and post op complications in hip fracture patients with COVID-19 infection [6,18,19,21,22].
Studies emanating from single centers suffer from inherent selection bias. Insurance claims data is limited, inconsistent and subject to interpretation [23]. Previous early reviews of national databases or consortium data lacked some of the key information such as potential delay in surgeries or a comparison group of patients from pre-COVID era [15,16,18,19].
The purpose of this study was to compare the pre-operative characteristics, 30-day postoperative complications and mortality for patients who were treated for a traumatic hip fracture in 2020 (during the COVID-19 pandemic) with those treated in 2019 (pre-COVID-19), using American College of Surgeon (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Secondarily, we sought to compare the time from hospital admission to surgical fixation between these groups.

2. Methods

This is a retrospective review of ACS NSQIP® proximal femoral fracture dataset from 2019 and 2020. The inclusion criteria have been described below under the case selection. Patient with missing information were excluded from the respective analysis. The study was deemed exempt from institutional review board (IRB) review.

2.1. ACS-NSQIP®

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)® [23] was used to extract the data for patients undergoing surgical treatment of proximal femur fractures in 2020. Data for patients with the same ICD 10 diagnostic codes from 2019 were used for comparison. The NSQIP database is a collection of patient records from over 680 participating hospitals across the United States [23]. Each institution assigns a trained data reviewer who randomly selects from a variety of surgical cases and uploads deidentified patient information and outcomes up to 30 days post-op onto a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant web-based platform [23]. The data is made available to investigators affiliated with the participating hospitals. NSQIP extracts the data directly from patient’s medical chart, and not insurance claims. The data is risk-adjusted and case-mix adjusted [23]. The data from the entire year was used to counter balance any effect of seasonal variation in incidence, morbidity and mortality of hip fractures [24,25,26].

2.2. Case Selection

Case data were extracted from the yearly (2019 and 2020) Participant User File (PUF) provided by ACS. International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes were used to identify and extract cases with proximal femoral fractures: femoral neck (S72.0), intertrochanteric (S72.1) and subtrochanteric (S72.2). A detailed breakdown of all the cases with respective ICD-10 codes is provided in the Supplementary Table S1.

2.3. Pre-Operative and Intra-Operative Characteristics (Table 1)

Demographic characteristics including age, gender, race and ethnicity were extracted. Information regarding pre-existing medical conditions: diabetes (type 1, type 2 and non-diabetic), COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), ascites, CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), HTN (Hypertension), presence of non-healing wound, dyspnea, vent dependance, steroid use, loss of ≥10% of body weight, bleeding disorder, pre-operative transfusion, pneumonia, pre-operative UTI (Urinary tract infection) and pre-operative infection of surgical site (superficial, muscle fascia, bone/joint) were also extracted. In addition, NSQIP collects information regarding functional status of patients and smoking history. Functional status is categorized as ‘independent’, ‘partially dependent’ and ‘fully dependent’ based upon the ability of patient to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) such as clothing, bathing and toileting at their peak physical function during the 30 days prior to admission. Smoking history is defined as having smoked within a year prior to surgery.
Table 1. Cross Table Year of Diagnosis and Preoperative and Intraoperative Patient Characteristics with Traumatic Proximal Femoral Fractures.
Table 1. Cross Table Year of Diagnosis and Preoperative and Intraoperative Patient Characteristics with Traumatic Proximal Femoral Fractures.
Cross Table Year of Diagnosis and Preoperative and Intraoperative Patient Characteristics with Traumatic
Proximal Femoral Fractures
20192020
nValid% of TotalnValid% of Totalp-Value
Total Patients 26,83010026,300100
Age
18–39 years1820.71820.7
40–64 years26619.925729.8
>65 years23,98789.423,54689.50.853
Gender
Male 868432.4862032.8
Female18,14567.617,67767.2
Non-Bi10300.356
Race
White17,42691.216,00389.8
African American9344.99385.3
AIAN1080.6990.6
API6413.47664.3
Other00100.1<0.001
Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic17,80293.216,97393.4
Hispanic12956.812066.60.57
Diabetes
Type 12155821098
Type 2290910.8291611.1
Non-Diabetic21,76681.121,27580.90.664
Smoking Status
Non-Smoker23,41887.322,93787.2
Smoker341212.7336312.80.809
Dyspnea
At rest2410.92210.8
At moderate exertion20367.619047.2
No Dyspnea24,55391.524,17591.90.231
Functional Status
Independent20,88578.520,11877.2
Partially Dependent482218.1498619.1
Fully Dependent 8883.39673.7<0.001
Ventilator Dependant
Yes440.2530.2
No26,78699.826,24799.80.311
COPD
Yes280210.4265210.1
No24,02889.623,64889.90.172
Ascites
Yes710.3730.3
No26,75999.726,22799.70.774
CHF
Yes10403.99443.6
No25,79096.125,35696.40.081
HTN
Yes17,62564.317,02764.7
No956535.7927335.30.345
Disseminated Cancer
Yes4881.84711.8
No26,34298.225,82998.20.809
Presence of Wound
Yes80036702.5
No26,0309725,63097.50.002
Steroid Use
Yes13825.212874.9
No25,44894.825,01395.10.174
≥10% loss of body weight
Yes6472.410544
No26,18397.625,24696<0.001
Bleeding Disorder
Yes393514.7381414.5
No22,89585.322,48685.50.591
Pre-Operative Transfusion
Yes8953.39513.6
No25,93596.725,34996.40.078
Pre-Operative Sepsis
None23,41387.322,65086.1
SIRS329012.3351113.3
Sepsis1160.41260.5
Septic Shock1101300.002
Emergent
Yes843731.4901734.3
No18,39368.617,28365.7<0.001
Pre-Operative Superficial Surgical Site Infection
Yes5020
No26,82510026,2981000.268
Pre-Operative Deep Surgical Site Infection (Muscles/Fascia)
Yes1010
No26,82910026,2991000.989
Pre-Operative Deep Organ Surgical Site Infection (Bone/ Joint)
Yes3050
No26,82710026,2951000.462
Pneumonia
Yes2040.82150.8
No26,62699.226,08599.20.457
Pre-Operative Urinary Tract Infection
Yes2360.92340.9
No26,59499.126,06699.10.803
Wound Class
Clean26,45498.625,93198.6
Clean/Contaminated3181.23201.2
Contaminated520.2400.2
Dirty/Infected60900.551
ASA
Class I2530.92290.9
Class II462317.3428016.3
Class III16,50361.616,24761.9
Class IV534820545820.8
Class V480.2470.20.014
Anesthesia
General19,09571.217,86767.9
Regional535920580022.1
Other23738.8263010<0.001
Surgical Procedure
Hemiarthroplasty285110.625279.6
Total Hip Arthroplasty15615.814975.7
ORIF Neck or Prosthetic785129.3785529.9
ORIF IT, Peritroch, Subtroch with plates and screws18626.915866
IM Nail for IT, Peritroch, Subtroch11,77243.911,88345.2
Other9333.59523.6<0.001
The intraoperative characteristics analyzed included anesthesia (general, regional and other) and wound class (clean, clean/contaminated, contaminated, and dirty/infected). Information regarding ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist) class was also extracted and presented in Table 1. NSQIP presents surgical procedures as CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) codes. Surgical procedures with frequency more than 1% have also been presented separately in Table 1. The category ‘others’ includes CPT codes with frequency less than 1%. A detailed account of all the CPT codes for the entire cohort is presented in Supplementary Table S2.

2.4. Thirty-Day Postoperative Characteristics and Mortality (Table 2)

A variety of 30-day postoperative characteristics are collected by NSQIP. These include acute renal failure, postoperative surgical site infection (superficial, muscle/fascia, bone/joint), wound dehiscence, pneumonia, reintubation, pulmonary embolism, ventilator >48 h, UTI, CVA, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, transfusion >2, DVT, sepsis, septic shock, return to operating room, readmission due to hip fracture and discharge destination. In addition, 30-day post-op mortality data is also presented in Table 2. In addition, continuous variables: length of total hospital stay, total operation time and time from admission to surgical fixation, have also been extracted and presented as mean and standard deviation (SD).
Table 2. Cross Table Year of Diagnosis and Postoperative Patient Characteristics with Traumatic Proximal Femoral Fractures.
Table 2. Cross Table Year of Diagnosis and Postoperative Patient Characteristics with Traumatic Proximal Femoral Fractures.
Cross Table Year of Diagnosis and Postoperative Patient Characteristics with Traumatic Proximal Femoral Fractures
20192020
nValid% of TotalnValid% of Totalp-Value
Total Patients 26,83010026,300100
Acute Renal Failure
Yes1880.72400.9
No26,64299.326,06099.10.006
Postoperative Superficial Surgical Site Infection
Yes27112961.1
No26,5599926,00498.90.196
Postoperative Deep Surgical Site Infection (Muscles/Fascia)
Yes350.1410.2
No26,79599.926,52999.80.438
Postoperative Deep Organ Surgical Site Infection (Bone/Joint)
Yes680.3800.3
No26,76299.726,22099.70.267
Wound Dehiscence
Yes280.1250.1
No26,80299.926,27599.90.734
Postoperative Pneumonia
Yes9903.710754.1
No25,84096.325,22595.90.018
Reintubation
Yes26712911.1
No26,5639926,00998.90.208
Postoperative Pulmonary Embolism
Yes2010.72521
No26,62999.326,048990.009
Postoperative Ventilator >48 h
Yes1310.51240.5
No26,69999.526,17699.50.78
Postoperative UTI
Yes9893.79823.7
No25,84196.325,31896.30.771
Postoperative CVA
Yes2030.81870.7
No26,62799.226,11399.30.538
Postoperative Cardiac Arrest
Yes1700.61740.7
No26,66099.426,12699.30.688
Postoperative Myocardial Infarction
Yes5091.96052.3
No26,32198.125,69597.70.001
Post-Operartive Bleeding Transfusion > 2
Yes521219.4508719.3
No21,61880.621,21380.70.807
Postoperative DVT
Yes2340.92791.1
No26,59699.126,02198.90.026
Postoperative Sepsis
Yes26112651
No26,5699926,035990.685
Postoperative Septic Shock
Yes1660.61580.6
No26,66499.426,14299.40.79
Return to Operating Room
Yes6272.36152.3
No26,20397.725,68597.70.991
Reoperation due to Hip Fracture
Yes4511.74381.7
No26,37998.325,86298.30.889
Unplanned Readmission
Yes20187.520617.8
No24,81292.524,23992.20.173
30-Day Mortality
Alive25,4879524,81194.3
Dead1343514895.70.003
Discharge Destination
Home564421.4728628.3
Facility20,12276.317,84069.3
AMA390.1510.2
Expired5572.15832.3<0.001
MeanStandard DeviationMeanStandard Deviation
Length of total hospital stay 4.6714.84.5715.90.463
Total operation time (minutes) 66.6839.467.3538.90.047
Days from hospital admission to operation 1.153.11.163.30.935

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The χ2 test of independence was used to compare the categorical variables. Two-sided independent sample t-test was used to compare the means of continuous variables. Logistic regression model was constructed to run a multivariable analysis with categorical pre-operative and postoperative variables achieving significance on univariable analysis.
The variable ‘Race’ was not included in our multivariable model. Inclusion of ‘Race’ in multivariable model resulted in unexpected singularities in the Hessian matrix.

3. Results

There were a total of 26,830 cases sampled for 2019 and 26,300 cases sampled for 2020 (Table 1).

3.1. Demographics (Table 1)

There was no significant change in age (p = 0.853) or gender (p = 0.356) distribution of patients undergoing proximal femoral fracture surgery before COVID-19 pandemic (2019) and during COVID-19 pandemic (2020). However, a statistically significant increase in racial distribution of Asian Pacific Islanders and a decrease in Caucasians was observed among patients with proximal femoral fractures in 2020 (p < 0.001).

3.2. Pre-Operative Factors (Table 1)

A statistically significant decrease was seen in the number of ‘independent’ patients from 2019 (78.5%) to 2020 (77.2%) (p < 0.001). Similarly, there was a decrease observed in the number of patients with chronic wounds from pre-COVID-19 (2019) to COVID-19 (2020) time period (p = 0.002). More than 10% loss of body weight was seen in only 2.4% of the patients during 2019 as compared to 4% of the patients during 2020 (p < 0.001). There were only 87.3% of patients with no signs of sepsis before the proximal femoral fracture surgery in 2019 as compared to 86.1% of patients in 2020 (p = 0.002). A statistically significantly higher number of cases were designated as emergent during 2020 (p < 0.001).

3.3. Intraoperative Factors

A higher ASA classification (p = 0.014) and a lower proportion of patients receiving general anesthesia (p < 0.001) was seen during COVID-19 pandemic (2020). A higher proportion of patients underwent surgical procedure ‘IM Nail placement’ during 2020 (45.2% vs. 43.9%). Additionally, surgical procedures ‘hemiarthroplasty’ (10.6% vs. 9.6%) and ‘ORIF intertrochanteric, peri-trochanteric, and sub-trochanteric with plates and screws’ (6.9% vs. 6%) were more commonly seen during 2019 (p < 0.001). There was an increased mean total operation time during 2020 (67.35) when compared to 2019 (66.68). This finding achieved border line statistical significance with p = 0.047 and is of limited clinical significance.

3.4. Postoperative Factors (Table 2)

A higher proportion of patients developed postoperative acute renal failure during the COVID-19 pandemic (0.9%) as compared to 2019 (0.7%). This finding achieved statistical significance with p-value = 0.006. A similar increase was seen in patients developing postoperative pneumonia (p = 0.018), DVT (p = 0.026), PE (p = 0.009) and acute myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.001). A higher proportion of patients was discharged home rather than another health facility during 2020 (28.3%) as compared to 2019 (21.4%) (p < 0.001). A higher 30-day post-op mortality of 5.7% was also observed during 2020 as compared to 5% during 2019 (p = 0.003).

3.5. Multivariable Analysis (Table 3)

A multivariable logistic regression model of statistically significant categorical variables on univariable analysis is presented in Table 3. Pre-operative factors: ‘Emergent’ status of the surgery (p < 0.001), ≥10% loss of body weight (p < 0.001), and postoperative factors: acute renal failure (0.012), PE (0.043), MI (0.005), DVT (0.044), discharge destination ‘Home’ (p < 0.001) and leaving ‘AMA’ (p = 0.027) and higher rate of 30-day mortality (p = 0.001) were statistically significantly associated with the year 2020 (pandemic year). The presence of an open wound (p < 0.001), ‘independent’ functional status (p < 0.001) and surgical procedures ‘hemiarthroplasty’ (p = 0.002) and ‘ORIF intertrochanteric, peri-trochanteric, and sub-trochanteric with plates and screws’ (p < 0.001) were statistically significant associated with pre-COVID-19.
Table 3. Multivariable analysis and logistic regression.
Table 3. Multivariable analysis and logistic regression.
Multivariable Analysis
Logistic Regression nOR95% CIp-Value
Year of DiagnosisDependent Variable
201926,075 Reference
202025,513
≥10% loss of body weight
Yes16301.6691.506–1.850<0.001
No49,958 Reference
Presence of wound
Yes14040.8320.747–0.927<0.001
No50,184 Reference
Pre-Operative Sepsis
None44,7210.9270.391–2.1980.863
SIRS66141.0270.433–2.4360.953
Sepsis2321.0220.415–2.5170.962
Septic Shock21 Reference
Emergent
Yes16,6301.11.059–1.143<0.001
No34,958 Reference
Functional Status
Independent40,3560.8830.802–0.9730.012
Partially Dependent94400.9540.861–1.0560.362
Fully Dependent 1792 Reference
ASA
Class I4800.8240.507–1.340.436
Class II87970.9460.602–1.4870.809
Class III31,9831.0760.686–1.6880.751
Class IV10,2511.0910.695–1.7140.704
Class V77 Reference
Anesthesia
General36,1233.5010.391–31.3720.263
Regional10,7643.9480.44–35.3890.22
Other4703 Reference
Acute Renal Failure
Yes4131.2921.061–1.15740.011
No51,175 Reference
Postoperative Pulmonary Embolism
Yes4251.2191.003–1.4810.047
No51,163 Reference
Postoperative Myocardial Infarction
Yes10361.1921.051–1.3510.006
No50,552 Reference
Postoperative DVT
Yes4951.1921.051–1.3510.049
No51,093 Reference
30-Day Mortality
Alive48,8110.8490.768–0.9390.001
Dead2777 Reference
Discharge Destination
Home12,8171.6931.446–1.983<0.001
Facility37,5691.0890.934–1.270.276
AMA901.6581.061–2.590.026
Expired1112 Reference
Surgical Procedure
Hemiarthroplasty51610.8430.757–0.9390.002
Total Hip Arthroplasty30140.8890.791-10.049
ORIF Neck or Prosthetic15,2720.9550.866–1.0530.354
ORIF IT, Peritroch, Subtroch with plates and screws32570.7820.697–0.878<0.001
IM Nail for IT, Peritroch, Subtroch23,0410.9830.893–1.0820.726
Other1843 Reference

4. Discussion

This study utilized the ACS NSQIP PUF from year 2019 and 2020 to compare the demographics, preoperative, intraoperative, 30-day postoperative characteristics and 30-day post-op mortality for patients with proximal femoral fractures before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. To our knowledge, this is the first investigation of its kind, comparing a national sample of proximal femoral fracture patients before and during the pandemic. Our findings confirm higher 30-day post-op mortality during the pandemic year, a finding shared by others [6,7,10,18,19,21]. The current study highlights significant differences in patient characteristics and outcomes during the pandemic. The findings of this study are novel as this is the first study to report impact of COVID-19 on care of proximal femoral fractures sampled from the US national data. We believe that these findings will provide the fundamentals to institute policies and changes to equip and prepare the current health care system to face and tackle a similar challenge in future.
Using the logistic regression, we were able to ascertain independent preoperative and postoperative variables associated with the pandemic. Proximal femoral fracture surgery was more likely to be declared ‘Emergent’ status during the year 2020. Although this finding has not been previously reported in the literature, a case with an emergent status is more likely to be authorized, given the shortage and diversion of resources during COVID-19. A weight loss of ≥10% of body weight was also found to be independently statistically significant for the pandemic year, another finding unique to our analysis. Patients with proximal femoral fractures during pandemic were less likely to be functionally independent and less likely to have an open wound. Boukebous et al. presented an analysis of proximal femoral fracture patients treated at a level 1 trauma center in France during the pandemic [10]. They did not find any difference in IADL (Instrument of activities of daily living) between 2019 and 2020. However, IADL was an independent predictor of all-cause 30-day mortality in their analysis [10].
Patients undergoing surgery for proximal femoral fractures were more likely to develop acute renal failure during pandemic. Levitt et al. presented an analysis of N3C (National COVID-19 cohort collaborative) and found a statistically significant increase in acute kidney injury in COVID-19 positive patients [19]. Similar findings were also reported by Hall et al. [15]. In the current study, patients with proximal femoral fractures had a higher likelihood of DVT, PE and MI during the pandemic. A higher incidence of thromboembolic events has also been reported by others [11,15,19]. Galivanche et al. reported a higher incidence of myocardial infarction among COVID-19 positive patients undergoing surgical fixation [11]. Our investigation has also shown that patients were more likely to receive ‘hemiarthroplasty’ or ‘ORIF intertrochanteric, peri-trochanteric, and sub-trochanteric with plates and screws’ in 2019 on a multivariable analysis. This finding has not been previously reported in the literature. Our dataset lacked the details about surgical approach for hemiarthroplasty, however, a recent study emanating from Italy reported improved oxygenation in lateral decubitus position as compared to supine position [27].
Our investigation has shown an increase in proportion of Asian Pacific islanders and a decrease in proportion of Caucasians with proximal femoral fractures during 2020. Egol et al. also reported an observed increase in proportion of Asian Pacific islander patients with hip fractures as compared to the corresponding months of the previous year [6]. However, due to a smaller sample size, their finding was not statistically significant. A statistically significant increase in Asian Pacific Islander patients has not been previously reported in the literature. However, caution should be exercised in interpreting this finding. As mentioned earlier, NSQIP collects and reports a sample of cases from over 680 hospitals in the U.S. [23]. The sampling methods for data collection have been standardized [23]. In the past, others have utilized the NSQIP data to validate the demographic distribution in prospective clinical trials [28]. However, considering that NSQIP collects a sample of actual data, this finding needs additional validation. Such validation would be ideally obtained by using a national population-based registry to calculate the incidence of hip fracture during 2020 for different racial groups.

Limitation

The major limitation of our analysis is the lack of data regarding covid infection. ACS NSQIP® has yet to release the data regarding COVID-19 status. Thus, a direct comparison of covid positive patients with COVID-19 negative patients was not possible. We have only presented the data during the COVID-19 pandemic and compared it to the data before the pandemic. Another limitation of our study is a lack of survival analysis to determine the prognostic factors. COVID-19 positivity has been widely implicated as a significant prognostic factor in the literature [6,15,19,29]. An analysis of prognostic factors in the absence of COVID-19 status would be inherently biased. Thus, an analysis of prognostication has not been included.

5. Conclusions

In this retrospective NSQIP database study comparing hip fracture surgery patients prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic, we identified an increased proportion of Asian Pacific islanders patients with hip fractures during the pandemic. Additionally, this study confirmed previously identified increased postoperative mortality among hip fracture patients during the pandemic [6,7,10,18,19,21]. Our study has also demonstrated that despite the stress of COVID-19 on the healthcare system, time from hospital admission to OR for proximal femur fractures did not increase. Surgical procedures of ‘hemiarthroplasty’ and ‘ORIF intertrochanteric, peri-trochanteric and sub-trochanteric with plates and screws’ were performed less often during the pandemic. The study sample is derived from more than 680 hospitals across the US and thus is representative of the national data.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11226778/s1, Table S1: Frequency table Diagnoses, ICD-10 codes with description; Table S2: Surgical Procedure CPT Codes.

Author Contributions

Data curation, analysis, statistical analysis and initial write up: M.U.J. and C.M.D. Manuscript revision: S.T.C., E.P.F. and G.L.S.S. Conception and idea: M.A.L., R.L.R. and S.W.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to retrospective analysis of database.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The source data is publicly available at ACS website: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/data-and-registries/acs-nsqip/participant-use-data-file/ (accessed on 7 October 2022).

Conflicts of Interest

All of the authors confirm that there are no financial conflict of interest.

References

  1. CDC. CDC Museum COVID-19 Timeline. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/museum/timeline/covid19.html (accessed on 3 May 2022).
  2. CMS. CMS Releases Recommendations on Adult Elective Surgeries, Non-Essential Medical, Surgical, and Dental Procedures During COVID-19 Response. 2020. Available online: https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/press-releases/cms-releases-recommendations-adult-elective-surgeries-non-essential-medical-surgical-and-dental (accessed on 10 May 2022).
  3. Pincus, D.; Ravi, B.; Wasserstein, D.; Huang, A.; Paterson, J.M.; Nathens, A.B.; Kreder, H.J.; Jenkinson, R.J.; Wodchis, W.P. Association Between Wait Time and 30-Day Mortality in Adults Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery. JAMA 2017, 318, 1994–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ryan, D.J.; Yoshihara, H.; Yoneoka, D.; Egol, K.A.; Zuckerman, J.D. Delay in Hip Fracture Surgery: An Analysis of Patient-Specific and Hospital-Specific Risk Factors. J. Orthop. Trauma 2015, 29, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vidal, E.; Moreira-Filho, D.; Pinheiro, R.; Souza, R.C.; Almeida, L.; Camargo, K., Jr.; Boas, P.; Fukushima, F.; Coeli, C. Delay from fracture to hospital admission: A new risk factor for hip fracture mortality? Osteoporos. Int. 2012, 23, 2847–2853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Egol, K.A.; Konda, S.R.; Bird, M.L.; Dedhia, N.; Landes, E.K.; Ranson, R.A.; Solasz, S.J.; Aggarwal, V.K.; Bosco, J.A., 3rd; Furgiuele, D.L.; et al. Increased Mortality and Major Complications in Hip Fracture Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A New York City Perspective. J. Orthop. Trauma 2020, 34, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. LeBrun, D.G.; Konnaris, M.A.; Ghahramani, G.C.; Premkumar, A.; DeFrancesco, C.J.; Gruskay, J.A.; Dvorzhinskiy, A.; Sandhu, M.S.; Goldwyn, E.M.; Mendias, C.L.; et al. Hip Fracture Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Early Results From New York. J. Orthop. Trauma 2020, 34, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cheung, Z.B.; Forsh, D.A. Early outcomes after hip fracture surgery in COVID-19 patients in New York City. J. Orthop. 2020, 21, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bub, C.D.; Larsen, C.G.; Heimroth, J.; Aziz, H.; Pinpin, C.; Intravia, J.M.; Goldman, A. Hip Fracture Trends and Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Orthopedics 2021, 44, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boukebous, B.; Maillot, C.; Neouze, A.; Esnault, H.; Gao, F.; Biau, D.; Rousseau, M.A. Excess mortality after hip fracture during COVID-19 pandemic: More about disruption, less about virulence-Lesson from a trauma center. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0263680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Galivanche, A.R.; Mercier, M.R.; Schneble, C.A.; Brand, J.; Pathak, N.; Varthi, A.G.; Rubin, L.E.; Grauer, J.N. Clinical Characteristics and Perioperative Complication Profiles of COVID-19-Positive Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg Glob. Res. Rev. 2021, 5, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhong, H.; Poeran, J.; Liu, J.; Wilson, L.A.; Memtsoudis, S.G. Hip fracture characteristics and outcomes during COVID-19: A large retrospective national database review. Br. J. Anaesth. 2021, 127, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fessler, J.; Jacobsen, T.; Lauritzen, J.B.; Jorgensen, H.L. Mortality among hip fracture patients infected with COVID-19 perioperatively. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2021, 47, 659–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, K.C.; Xiao, R.; Cheung, Z.B.; Barbera, J.P.; Forsh, D.A. Early mortality after hip fracture surgery in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Orthop. 2020, 22, 584–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hall, A.J.; Clement, N.D.; Group, I.M.-G.; Ojeda-Thies, C.; MacLullich, A.M.; Toro, G.; Johansen, A.; White, T.O.; Duckworth, A.D. IMPACT-Global Hip Fracture Audit: Nosocomial infection, risk prediction and prognostication, minimum reporting standards and global collaborative audit: Lessons from an international multicentre study of 7090 patients conducted in 14 nations during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surgeon 2022, 20, e429–e446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hall, A.J.; Clement, N.D.; MacLullich, A.M.J.; Ojeda-Thies, C.; Hoefer, C.; Brent, L.; White, T.O.; Duckworth, A.D. IMPACT of COVID-19 on hip fracture services: A global survey by the International Multicentre Project Auditing COVID-19 in Trauma & Orthopaedics. Surgeon 2021, 20, 237–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Holleyman, R.J.; Khan, S.K.; Charlett, A.; Inman, D.S.; Johansen, A.; Brown, C.; Barnard, S.; Fox, S.; Baker, P.N.; Deehan, D.; et al. The impact of COVID-19 on mortality after hip fracture: A population cohort study from England. Bone Jt. J. 2022, 104, 1156–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Munoz Vives, J.M.; Jornet-Gibert, M.; Camara-Cabrera, J.; Esteban, P.L.; Brunet, L.; Delgado-Flores, L.; Camacho-Carrasco, P.; Torner, P.; Marcano-Fernandez, F.; Spanish, H.I.P.C.I.G. Mortality Rates of Patients with Proximal Femoral Fracture in a Worldwide Pandemic: Preliminary Results of the Spanish HIP-COVID Observational Study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2020, 102, e69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Levitt, E.B.; Patch, D.A.; Mabry, S.; Terrero, A.; Jaeger, B.; Haendel, M.A.; Chute, C.G.; Quade, J.H.; Ponce, B.; Theiss, S.; et al. Association Between COVID-19 and Mortality in Hip Fracture Surgery in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): A Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. Glob. Res. Rev. 2022, 6, e21-00282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Medlar, C.; Downey, C.; O’Kelly, P.; Murphy, B.; Quinlan, J.F. The Effect of COVID-19 on 30-Day Mortality Rates Amongst Fragility Hip Fracture Patients. Ir. Med. J. 2022, 115, 634. [Google Scholar]
  21. Catellani, F.; Coscione, A.; D’Ambrosi, R.; Usai, L.; Roscitano, C.; Fiorentino, G. Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fragility Fractures in Patients with COVID-19 During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in Northern Italy. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2020, 102, e58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mi, B.; Chen, L.; Xiong, Y.; Xue, H.; Zhou, W.; Liu, G. Characteristics and Early Prognosis of COVID-19 Infection in Fracture Patients. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2020, 102, 750–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. ACS. ACS NSQIP. Available online: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/data-and-registries/acs-nsqip/about-acs-nsqip/ (accessed on 4 May 2022).
  24. Hayashi, S.; Noda, T.; Kubo, S.; Myojin, T.; Nishioka, Y.; Higashino, T.; Imamura, T. Variation in fracture risk by season and weather: A comprehensive analysis across age and fracture site using a National Database of Health Insurance Claims in Japan. Bone 2019, 120, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mazzucchelli, R.; Crespi-Villarias, N.; Perez-Fernandez, E.; Durban Reguera, M.L.; Guzon Illescas, O.; Quiros, J.; Garcia-Vadillo, A.; Carmona, L.; Rodriguez-Caravaca, G.; Gil de Miguel, A. Weather conditions and their effect on seasonality of incident osteoporotic hip fracture. Arch. Osteoporos. 2018, 13, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zamora-Navas, P.; Esteban-Pena, M. Seasonality in incidence and mortality of hip fracture. Rev. Esp. Cir. Ortop. Traumatol. 2019, 63, 132–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Maccagnano, G.; Maruccia, F.; Rauseo, M.; Noia, G.; Coviello, M.; Laneve, A.; Quitadamo, A.P.; Trivellin, G.; Malavolta, M.; Pesce, V. Direct Anterior versus Lateral Approach for Femoral Neck Fracture: Role in COVID-19 Disease. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saltzman, B.M.; Cvetanovich, G.L.; Bohl, D.D.; Cole, B.J.; Bach, B.R., Jr.; Romeo, A.A. Comparisons of Patient Demographics in Prospective Sports, Shoulder, and National Database Initiatives. Orthop. J. Sport. Med. 2016, 4, 2325967116665589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. LeBrun, D.G.; Konnaris, M.A.; Ghahramani, G.C.; Premkumar, A.; DeFrancesco, C.J.; Gruskay, J.A.; Dvorzhinskiy, A.; Sandhu, M.S.; Goldwyn, E.M.; Mendias, C.L.; et al. Increased Comorbidity Burden Among Hip Fracture Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City. Geriatr. Orthop. Surg. Rehabil. 2021, 12, 21514593211040611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jawad, M.U.; Delman, C.M.; Campbell, S.T.; Fitzpatrick, E.P.; Soles, G.L.S.; Lee, M.A.; Randall, R.L.; Thorpe, S.W. Traumatic Proximal Femoral Fractures during COVID-19 Pandemic in the US: An ACS NSQIP® Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6778. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226778

AMA Style

Jawad MU, Delman CM, Campbell ST, Fitzpatrick EP, Soles GLS, Lee MA, Randall RL, Thorpe SW. Traumatic Proximal Femoral Fractures during COVID-19 Pandemic in the US: An ACS NSQIP® Analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(22):6778. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226778

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jawad, Muhammad Umar, Connor M. Delman, Sean T. Campbell, Ellen P. Fitzpatrick, Gillian L. S. Soles, Mark A. Lee, R. Lor Randall, and Steven W. Thorpe. 2022. "Traumatic Proximal Femoral Fractures during COVID-19 Pandemic in the US: An ACS NSQIP® Analysis" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 22: 6778. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11226778

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop