Next Article in Journal
Diagnosis of Congenital Uterine Abnormalities: Practical Considerations
Previous Article in Journal
Frozen Section of Parotid Gland Tumours: The Head and Neck Pathologist as a Key Member of the Surgical Team
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Are Differences in Inflammatory Markers between Patients with and without Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage Influenced by Circadian Blood Pressure Abnormalities?

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(5), 1252; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051252
by Nestor Vazquez-Agra 1,*, Ana-Teresa Marques-Afonso 1, Anton Cruces-Sande 2,*, Ignacio Novo-Veleiro 1, Jose-Enrique Lopez-Paz 1, Antonio Pose-Reino 1 and Alvaro Hermida-Ameijeiras 1
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(5), 1252; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051252
Submission received: 25 January 2022 / Revised: 13 February 2022 / Accepted: 22 February 2022 / Published: 25 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The original research entitled "Are differences in inflammatory markers between patients with and without hypertension-mediated organ damage influenced by circadian blood pressure abnormalities? is a well written and interesting draft, which evaluated some well-known aspects like the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers and HMOD, and other novel aspects like the potential effect of the modulation of those biomarkers by ambulatory hypertension phenotypes and HMOD development. Some minor aspects should be evaluated:

  • A treatment statistically significant imbalance between HMOD and no HMOD groups is observed. This data should be discussed regarding the impact on HMOD development and ABPM phenotypes
  • In the same scenario, and with the same recommendation, the frequency of diabetes is quite different in both groups. Diabetes is a well-known disease associated to higher frequency of non-dipping BP and higher frequency of HMOD. These huge and clinically relevant imbalances could be resolved by multivariate analysis?
  • The authors should discuss the ir/relevance of sample size in the absence of significant impact of circadian blood pressure profile, statistical type 2 error, reduced sample size?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Very nice paper including a significant number of subjects. I have only one comment to the statistical approach. The authors conclude that their hypothesis was not supported by their study. Therefore, in the methods section it should be shown that the study has a statistical power to confirm these negative findings.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop