Next Article in Journal
Nutritional Status Assessed with Objective Data Assessment Correlates with a High-Risk Foot in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
Previous Article in Journal
Oncofertility and Reproductive Counseling in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/jcm11051313
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antioxidant Effects of Statins by Modulating Nrf2 and Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling in Different Diseases

by
Atena Mansouri
1,2,
Željko Reiner
3,
Massimiliano Ruscica
4,
Eugenia Tedeschi-Reiner
5,
Shabnam Radbakhsh
6,7,
Mariam Bagheri Ekta
8 and
Amirhossein Sahebkar
2,9,10,*
1
Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand 9717853577, Iran
2
Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948954, Iran
3
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
4
Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100 Milan, Italy
5
University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, University of Osijek, Vinogradska Cesta 29, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
6
Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948564, Iran
7
Department of Medical Biotechnology and Nanotechnology, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948564, Iran
8
Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Pathology of Cardiovascular System, A.P. Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology, 3 Tsyurupy Str., 117418 Moscow, Russia
9
Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948564, Iran
10
Department of Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad 9177948954, Iran
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(5), 1313; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051313
Submission received: 8 January 2022 / Revised: 14 February 2022 / Accepted: 21 February 2022 / Published: 27 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Statins are competitive inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase and have been used to treat elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) for almost four decades. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties which are independent of the lipid-lowering effects of statins, i.e., their pleiotropic effects, might be beneficial in the prevention or treatment of many diseases. This review discusses the antioxidant effects of statins achieved by modulating the nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factor 2/ heme oxygenase-1 (Nrf2/HO-1) pathway in different organs and diseases. Nrf2 and other proteins involved in the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway have a crucial role in cellular responses to oxidative stress, which is a risk factor for ASCVD. Statins can significantly increase the DNA-binding activity of Nrf2 and induce the expression of its target genes, such as HO-1 and glutathione peroxidase) GPx, (thus protecting the cells against oxidative stress. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of statins, which are independent of their lipid-lowering effects, could be partly explained by the modulation of the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway.

1. Introduction

Statins are lipid-lowering drugs which inhibit the activity of the hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase enzyme in the cholesterol synthesis pathway [1,2]. They have been widely used for the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in hypercholesterolemic patients during almost the past four decades [3] and despite the introduction of newer agents [4,5,6,7]. Beyond their lipid-lowering activity, statins can modulate multiple metabolic pathways in different tissues and organs by which they achieve beneficial therapeutic effects in different diseases [8] Pravastatin (PRA), pitavastatin (PTV), rosuvastatin (RSV), lovastatin (LOV), simvastatin (SIM), atorvastatin (ATV), and fluvastatin (FLV) are different types of statins [9] that have not only low density lipoproteins cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering effects but many other pleiotropic beneficial effects such as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, and immunomodulatory [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Oxidative stress has an essential role in nitric oxide (NO) releasing, foam cell formation, atherosclerotic lesion progression, and instability of atherosclerotic plaque which are all involved in the process of atherogenesis [16,17]. Because of their effects on the antioxidant enzyme system, including lipoxygenases (LOXs), myeloperoxidase (MPO), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAD[P]H) oxidase, catalase, GPX, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) [18,19,20], statins can reduce atherosclerosis by their antioxidant effects. Girona et al. have demonstrated the antioxidant effect of SIM on lipoprotein particles in a preclinical study. SIM can decrease both oxidized HDL and oxidized LDL particles in a concentration-dependent manner [21]. Statins also achieve their antioxidant activity by their effects on nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a protein consisting of 589 amino acids with 66.1 kDa molecular mass, which belongs to the group of redox-sensitive transcription factors. This transcriptional factor expressed in several tissues such as the spleen, heart, kidney, and liver can improve the oxidative stress by regulating the expression of antioxidant enzymes, ROS detoxification, and can maintain redox homeostasis [22].
Nrf2 has seven NRF2-ECH homology (Neh) domains (Neh1–Neh7) (Figure 1) [22,23]. Three of them include Neh1, Neh3, and Neh6, and are located in the C-terminal while Neh2 is located in the N-terminal. Neh1 contains a leucine zipper motif which is important for DNA binding and dimerization with sMaf proteins. Neh2 is a negative regulatory domain and binds to cytoplasmic Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1). This domain has binding sites for DLG and ETGE motifs. Neh3, Neh4, and Neh5 domains are essential for the activation of transcription. Neh6 is a serine-rich conserved domain that targets Nrf2 for degradation.
The family of heme oxygenases (HO), which have three isoforms: HO-1, HO-2, and HO-3 are important enzymes in heme catabolism and their function is to degrade it to free iron, carbon monoxide (CO), and biliverdin. HO-2 and HO-3 are expressed in cells and tissues. HO-1 is inducible and responsible for Heme1 degradation. HO-1 is considered a cytoprotective enzyme because of its role in heme, biliverdin, and CO production. It has been shown that cell cultures and in vivo models have been protected because of its activity against oxidative stress, apoptosis, and eventual cell death [24,25,26,27,28].

2. Antioxidant Effects of Statins by Influencing Nrf2/HO-1 Pathway

Nrf2, as the main regulator, but also other proteins involved in the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway, have a crucial role in cellular responses to oxidative stress [29]. Human cell cultures from HO-1 deficiency cases showed an increased sensitivity to oxidative injury, and HO-1 knockout animal models have more lipid peroxidation and higher levels of oxidized proteins suggesting antioxidant effects of HO-1 [30]. The Neh1 domain of Nrf2, together with the Maf protein, can bind to the antioxidant response element (ARE), which is a cis-regulatory module located in the promoter region of several antioxidant enzymes and cytoprotective proteins including catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutases (SOD), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), thioredoxin reductase 1 (Txnrd1), and heme oxygenase-1 (HMOX1) [31,32]. In addition to the effects on antioxidant enzyme expression and activity, the Nrf2/HO-1 signaling axis can significantly attenuate ROS generation in mitochondria and modulate mitochondrial functional integrity [29].
Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, which are independent of the lipid-lowering effects of statins, i.e., their pleiotropic effects, are involved in the protective mechanisms of these medicines which might be beneficial in the prevention or treatment of many diseases [33,34,35,36]. By regulating different oxidation pathways which control NADPH oxidase, myeloperoxidase, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity, statins promote antioxidation and restore redox homeostasis [37]. Besides their direct antioxidant effects, statins affect Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathways causing the protection of cells against the detrimental effects of oxidative stress. Studies have shown that statins can significantly increase the DNA-binding activity of Nrf2 and induce the expression of its target genes, such as HO-1 and GPX, protecting the cells against the detrimental effects of oxidative stress [38]. Statin therapy also decreases reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by stimulating Nrf2 through the PI3K/Akt pathway [39]. It has to be mentioned that there are some data suggesting quite the opposite: that statins are able to cause toxicity based on oxidative stress in skeletal muscle, as well as neurotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, photosensitivity, and renal toxicity. However, in the following sections, we shall review the literature investigating the antioxidant effects of statins by modulating the Nrf2/HO-1 pathway in different organs and diseases (Table 1 and Table 2).

3. The Effects of Statins on Different Organs and Diseases

3.1. Effects on the Heart and Cardiovascular Diseases

Due to its high prevalence and burden, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major global problem. According to the latest statistical information, 92.1 million adults living in the United States have one form of CVD. Almost 31.5% or 17.3 million people die because of CVD each year in the world. One of the most severe forms of CVD is myocardial infarction (MI), which affects more than 790,000 persons in the US each year [68,69]. However, there has been a consistent improvement in trends for long-term survival and outcomes after MI [70,71,72,73]. Increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) are the cause of the ischemic damage of myocardial cells in the early stages of MI. Myocytes are exposed to additional oxidative stress by reperfusion; however, this process is essential for maintaining the myocardial cells for life. Based on troponin concentration, the amount of myocardial cell death was measured and it has been established that ROS plays an important role in ischemia and cell death [72,74]. Innate defense mechanisms have been evaluated to identify the mechanisms, which might improve the situation after myocardial damage. Nrf2 has been identified as a protective substance in different tissues including the heart muscle. Because of the critical role of Nrf2 in multifaceted cellular defense, research efforts on this issue have increased in the recent periods. Nrf2 is activated by oxidative stress causing the expression of cytoprotective genes. Statins inhibit ROS production by concomitant suppression of Rac1/NADPH oxidase activity and up-regulation of the activity of GPx, thereby reducing VEGF expression [75]. Evidence shows that statins suppress the inflammatory reactions via the Nrf2 pathway. The treatment with atorvastatin achieved blood flow through the occluded left anterior descending artery (LAD), inducing HO-1 and Nrf2 and therefore reducing the infarction size. Besides lipid-lowering effects, the statins have other beneficial effects in atherosclerosis. The transcription factor Nrf2, under conditions of oxidative stress, activates the expression of HO-1, among other proteins. The Nrf2/HO-1 pathway is highly related to the initiation and development of atherosclerosis. It could be concluded that statins improve CVD by inducing an antioxidant HO-1 defense mechanism and remodeling of the myocardial structure [76], but also have anti-atherosclerotic effects apart from lipid-lowering [77].

3.2. Effects on Lung Diseases

The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that the third common cause of mortality is chronic respiratory diseases, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, asthma, and bronchiectasis [78]. Despite the increased incidence of chronic pulmonary diseases, there is no substantially new and advanced treatment in the last years, at least not for some of them [79]. This increase could be explained by the increasing number of smokers and increased environmental pollution [78]. Of course, there are some established treatments for these diseases including anti-inflammatory drugs, β-adrenergic agonists, steroids, and antibiotics [75,80]. However, some patients are drug-resistant to these treatments and they need other effective treatments to replace them [81]. Some of the alternative drugs for chronic lung diseases might be statins. Although the main effect of statins is LDL-C lowering, these drugs also have cholesterol-independent effects, which might be beneficial in several diseases including chronic respiratory diseases. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that MVS inhibited TNF’s ability to induce adhesion molecules by inducing the antioxidant enzyme (HO-1). Studies have demonstrated that MVS induced HO-1 expression is mediated by signaling components and transcription factors such as P47phox, Nox2, c-Src, PDGFR, Akt, and Nrf2. HO-1 expression against pulmonary inflammation was detected due to the p47phox-Nox2-dependent activation of PDGFR/PI3K/Akt and activation of the Nrf2/AREs pathways, which appeared to protect against inflammatory reactions [45]. Treatment with statins has many advantages including reducing the cost, risks, and toxicity. Studies have shown that statins have pleiotropic effects interfering with different pathways suppressing inflammatory, oxidative stress, and proliferation activities [82]. There were some data indicating that treatment with statins might be associated with statin-induced interstitial pneumonia [83]. However, some other studies have suggested that statins were associated with the reduced risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [84]. It has to be stated that at the moment there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that there is a clear deleterious or beneficial effect of statins on disease-related outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [85,86].

3.3. Effects on Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 11% of the adult population in the United States [87]. CKD has five stages based mostly upon glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [88,89]. Stages 1 and 2 have reduced kidney function but still normal GFR. Stages 3 to 5 have increasing reductions in GFR. The health condition of patients with CKD depends also on concomitant diseases, e.g., diabetes mellitus. These patients can have CVD and die before they reach end-stage renal disease. CKD is one of the important risk factors for CVD, especially in patients who are, because of other risk factors, at high risk for CVD [90]. Studies have shown that statins could reduce the severity of glomerular damage and preserve renal function [91,92,93]. New Zealand rabbits fed on a high cholesterol diet had glomerular hypertrophy and glomerulosclerosis. When these rabbits were treated with ATV, their plasma cholesterol was reduced and renal injury including glomerular hypertrophy was prevented. However, the mechanism by which statins may protect renal function is not clear. Statins inhibit HMG-CoA reductase which is important not only for endogenous cholesterol synthesis but they also inhibit geranyl pyrophosphate and isoprenoids as well as farnesyl pyrophosphate [94,95]. Isoprenoids cause different cellular responses like cell proliferation and migration as well as different gene expression by binding to intracellular signaling proteins.
Studies have shown that targeting oxidative stress can improve renal IR injury. An important pathway which is associated with antioxidative stress is nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factor 2 (Nrf2)/heme oxygenase 1 (HO1). The transcription factor Nrf2, a factor that can bind to antioxidant response elements (ARE), is located at the promoter regions of many antioxidant and detoxifying genes, including HO1. In addition, it seems that acetylcysteine has anti-inflammatory effects and improves renal injury by affecting Nrf2/HO1 activity [96]. Statins block the synthesis of isoprenoids and therefore they are able to restore the impaired capacity of progenitor cells. GFR is increased in oxidative stress. Renal injury is associated with elevated levels of inflammatory factors [97] and statins can reduce the inflammatory response. In a trial on 91 patients with CKD who were treated with 10 mg/day of rosuvastatin for 20 weeks, a 47% reduction in high specific C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and an improvement of GFR for 11% was achieved [98]. Although this indicates that statins might be effective in preventing CVD, more research is needed to be performed on patients with CKD to provide a clear answer about this issue [87].

3.4. Effects on Liver Disease

One of the important functions of the liver is cholesterol metabolism and the liver is also the main organ in which the effects of statins on cholesterol synthesis but also on plasma cholesterol levels occur. The risk of CVD is increased in liver diseases including hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [99,100,101]. Statins have beneficial effects in patients with chronic liver disease. Statins reduce cholesterol synthesis in the liver by regulating LDL receptors [102]. Statins have also pleiotropic effects that are not associated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibition, including antioxidant effects, anti-inflammatory effects, and effects on improving endothelial dysfunction [103]. Studies on NAFLD patients have shown that higher hsCRP is related with more severe NAFLD [104]. The activity of statins depends upon meta-substituents and lipophilicity of ortho-substituents on biphenyl and aryl moieties. Hepatic uptake transporter(s) play important roles in the clearance of different statins [105]. For example, some of them are metabolized by cytochrome P450 (fluvastatin, atorvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin). Other statins are metabolized in the liver (rosuvastatin, pitavastatin, and pravastatin) [103]. A meta-analysis showed that statins with lower lipophilicity and in higher doses have higher aminotransferase activity [106]. Nrf2 target genes HO-1 and GPX2 are enhanced by simvastatin. The livers of animals treated with simvastatin also showed Nrf2 activation. Because simvastatin had the same effect on Nrf2 in primary rat hepatocytes as it did in human cells, these effects were attributed directly to its action on the liver [107]. In addition to inhibiting the synthesis of cholesterol, statins also inhibit the formation of isoprenoids, like isopentenyl pyrophosphate and farnesyl pyrophosphate, by interfering with the production of mevalonate. Since the production of isoprenoids are inhibited, other important molecules are affected as well. Some of them are selenoproteins GPX1 and TRXR. The ability of statins to block the synthesis of selenoproteins GPX1 and TRXR may be one of the mechanisms by which they inhibit Nrf2 activation. GPX1 mRNA levels are decreased in the liver of selenium deficient rats. It has been recently demonstrated that Nrf2-mediated cytoprotective responses balance the reduced selenoprotein activity, which is necessary for maintaining cellular redox homeostasis. The reduction of both GPX1 and TRXR by simvastatin may contribute to the potentiation of Nrf2 and, consequently, the increased expression of GPX2. The response of selenoproteins to selenium deficiency seems to be different. Specifically, selenium deficiency increases GPX2 and decreases GPX1 in HepG2 cells [108] Although statins seem to be beneficial in patients with chronic liver disease, not much is known about the effects of statins on abnormal cell signaling pathways and liver histology; therefore, more studies on this issue are needed [109].

3.5. Effects on Eye Diseases

Statins have beneficial effects on many tissues including the eyes. However, there was a vivid debate in the past about the beneficial effects of statins on these diseases. In the early 1980s, physicians recommended that before starting statin therapy, eye exams should be made because of the alleged correlation with incident cataracts [110]. However, it has been shown that persistent statin use was significantly protective for the incidence of cataract in men and women under 75 years of age as well as for age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) [111]. More recent studies failed to prove the benefit of statins for ARMD. Actually, it has been shown that more than one year of statin use was associated with an increased hazard for exudative ARMD, but the authors of this study have clearly stated that their observations warrant further study and should not be the rationale for any changes in the use of statins to treat dyslipidemias [112]. Some studies discussed the relationship between statins and glaucoma progression, and their results showed that patients on statins did have less glaucoma progression. It has been shown that long-term use of statins seems to be associated with a reduced risk of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) [113,114]. About three million US citizens suffer from glaucoma [115]. In a study on 524 109 individuals with hyperlipidemia, the hazard of developing OAG decreased by 0.3% for every additional month of treatment with statins and those who were treated with statins continuously for two years had an 8% decreased OAG risk compared to those who received no statin therapy. They also had a 9% decreased risk of progressing OAG glaucoma when compared with those who received no statin therapy [113]. Oxidative stress affects the eye seriously. There are several oxidative conditions that contribute to the exposure to such stress including photooxidation, ionizing radiation, and smoke. Its high metabolism makes the retina one of the most perfused and oxygenated tissues in the body. Likewise, the content of polyunsaturated fatty acids is higher than those found in other body tissues. Consequently, it is vulnerable to oxidizing substances like ROS. Oxidative stress has been demonstrated to influence many ocular diseases such as diabetic retinopathy (DR), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), glaucoma, and cataract. The pathophysiology of the major ocular diseases includes inflammation and oxidative stress. Several studies have demonstrated that Nrf2 has both antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. The protection provided by medicines such as statins can be therefore beneficial [116]. The explanation why statins might have these effects could be that they are regulating nitric oxide synthase thereby increasing the blood flow to the optic nerve and retina [117]. Statins could also inhibit apoptosis in the central nervous system [118]. This could be an explanation for the beneficial effects of statins on these eye diseases.

3.6. Effects on Cancer

Despite the concern that statins might cause cancer, many studies have shown a preventive potential of statins concerning cancer [119,120]. The mevalonate pathway may be limited by HMG-CoA reductase and since statins are inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase, they decrease mevalonate and products downstream of mevalonate. These substances are necessary for important cellular functions including cell signaling, protein synthesis, cell membrane integrity, and cell cycle progression [119]. Therefore, statins might control tumorigenesis and tumor metastasis by disrupting neoplastic cell pathways. Statins also suppress tumor activity by inhibiting matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [121]. MMPs have a role in anti-tumorigenesis because of degrading the extracellular matrix involved in the growth and invasion of tumors. According to some studies, statins decrease cell invasiveness and have beneficial effects on apoptosis [120]. Research on cell lines of mammary carcinoma [122,123], prostate carcinoma [124], colorectal carcinoma [125], lung carcinoma [126], and pancreatic carcinoma have supported these findings. However, the possible role of statins in the treatment of cancer still remains unclear and more studies are needed. There is no proof that statins are beneficial in breast cancer [127,128] although some studies reported a positive role of statins in this type of cancer. Cauley et al. showed a lower risk of breast cancer in patients treated with statins [129,130], but the results of six cohort studies [128,129,131,132,133,134] and two case-control studies could not support either positive or negative associations between statins and the occurrence of cancer [135,136]. The effect of statins on cell cycle progression may be annulled if statins were used with hormones, especially estrogens [132]. The results of a study on the association between statins and estrogen plus progestin showed a reduced risk of breast cancer [129]. This is important in the context of anti-cancer effects of statins in breast cancer cell lines, but the results of RCT are still insufficient. There are some phase II RCTs on statins and cancer, for example, exploring the effect of ATV on tumor proliferation, the effect of FLV on biomarkers, as well as the effect of SIM on the prevention during the early stage of breast cancer. Several studies analyzed the effect of statins on colorectal cancer. An important issue concerning colorectal cancer and breast cancer is that patients treated with statins when compared with healthy subjects are more likely to seek out preventive health services such as screening tests and have healthier lifestyles like performing regular exercise and sticking to the healthier diet [137,138]. The first RCT with ATV in phase II showed a decreased risk of colorectal neoplasia [137]. Another phase III trial with RSV and a phase II study showed beneficial effects of SIM in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Many studies were performed on statins and lung cancer [139,140]. They have shown that statin treatment is associated with lower lung cancer risk and related mortality [86]. Studies were performed also on the efficacy of statins in prostate cancer prevention but to make definitive conclusions the epidemiologic studies should take into account the type of statins used and the serum concentrations achieved and ensure that the tested statin inhibits the specific type of cancer in vitro at those concentrations [141,142]. An important marker for prostate cancer is PSA. Studies have shown that statins reduce PSA levels [143] and serum PSA was significantly lower in patients with prostate cancer who were treated preoperatively with statins compared with those who were not taking statins [144,145]. However, the association between statin treatment and prostate cancer, similarly to the association with other types of cancer, needs further studies. HO-1 is expressed in cancer cells by nuclear translocation of Nrf2 by the ERK pathway and by the PI3K/Akt pathway, which is affected by simvastatin. In endothelial cells, statins activate HO-1 and decrease free radical production. These effects allow them to act as antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents [146]. Carbon monoxide (CO) and free iron (Fe2) are then produced by the family of HO enzymes and heme is degraded to biliverdin. Bilirubin (derived from biliverdin degradation) and CO protect molecules from oxidative stress. Superoxide anions are reduced, lipid peroxidation is suppressed, apoptosis is prevented, vasodilation is increased, and local blood flow is improved. The expression of HO-1 can be high in some tumor cells and inhibiting the enzyme by specific inhibitors of this enzyme or by HO-1-shRNAs has been shown to inhibit the growth of some cancer cells. In contrast, HO-1 is known to display proapoptotic and anti-proliferative functions in cancer [147]. Simvastatin activates Nrf2, thereby up-regulating HO-1, NQO1, and GCLC expression in HT-29 and HCT116 cells. Nrf2 can promote tumor proliferation and prevent tumor development. ERK and PI3K/Akt signaling control the expression of Nrf2 and HO-1 in cancer cells. Simvastatin activates Nrf2 and increases its nuclear translocation in HT- 29 cells and stimulates the expression of antioxidants that are related to HO-1 via the ERK/PI3K/Akt pathway [66].

3.7. Effect on Neurodegenerative Disorders

The non-neuronal cells in the central nervous system (CNS) are glial cells or neuroglia, including microglia, oligodendroglia, and astroglia. These cells have an essential role in the metabolism of CNS [148,149]. Microglia are the primary innate immune system cells in the CNS [150]. They have also homeostatic regulatory properties [151]. Microgliosis is a strong reaction of microglia cells to pathogenic injuries [152]. Microglia activation causes the secretion of pro-inflammatory factors including cytokines, iNOS/NO, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and neuroinflammation [153]. The inflammation of the CNS is a defensive mechanism, and after the damage of the CNS, an immune response occurs. The inflammation causes the migration of immune system cells to the site of injury. Moreover, in the CNS, products of pro-inflammatory factors that are produced by activating microglia cells cause adverse effects on healthy neuronal cells and lead to neurological diseases (ND) such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s disease (AD), multiple sclerosis (MS), Huntington’s disease (HD), and others [154,155]. Statins have pleiotropic and anti-inflammatory effects [156,157]. Therefore, these drugs could be useful for protecting the CNS cells by their anti-neuroinflammation effects, they can improve angiogenesis, prevent superoxide free radicals, and improve phagocytic activity [158,159]. Recent research indicates that at least some statins inhibit microglia inflammation that induces mediators such as MMP-9, PGE2, IFN-γ, TNF-α, COX-2, and ROS/NO. Statins reduce the synthesis of cholesterol, and since hypercholesterolemia is an important risk factor for AD, they could improve AD. It seems that simvastatin can enhance neuroinflammation and oxidative stress response, reduce brain edema, improve neurological function, and improve the symptoms of cerebral hemorrhage. Statins reduce plasma cholesterol by inhibiting the mevalonate pathway. Mevalonate regulates the transduction of cellular signals and transcription factor activation [160]. After cerebral hemorrhage, inflammation factors such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α can cause damage to brain tissues, causing neurological dysfunction. The expression of Nrf2 and HO-1 and NQO1 downstream molecules can be up-regulated in brain tissues, and they are increased after simvastatin administration. Simvastatin controls the Nrf2-ARE pathway regulating downstream signaling molecules and preventing oxidative stress. Furthermore, simvastatin can increase antioxidant enzyme SOD levels, but also reduce GSH and GSSG levels. Nerve damage occurs as a result of oxidative stress products, such as MDA and NO [161]. Statins can protect neurons from oxidative stress by up-regulating antioxidant enzyme expression. They also increase Nrf2 transcription. Simvastatin is thought to stimulate the Nrf2-ARE pathway through nucleic acid binding. This could provide a new therapeutic method for patients with cerebral hemorrhage since simvastatin could be used to enhance neurological function [162]. The pleiotropic effects of statins might also have a beneficial effect on the course of ischemic stroke. Statins could also activate microglia and have beneficial effects in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases [163].

3.8. Effect on Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the widespread diseases and its incidence is increasing in all parts of the world. The complications of DM are microvascular and macrovascular changes, the latter being an important cause of mortality [164]. The activation of Nrf2 in human and animal cells develops when a high concentration glucose stimulus is applied acutely. Alternatively, if glucose concentration oscillates or incubation times are longer, Nrf2 is not activated [165]. Nrf2 activation is also primarily determined by glucose concentration and cell type. Keap1-knockdown (KD) and Nrf2-knockout (KO) mice do not change insulin resistance since they lack the activity of the Nrf2/Keap1 systems. In diabetic kidney (based upon biopsy findings), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and skin tissue, Nrf2 seems to be an important factor in preventing micro- and macrovascular complications. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) obtained from prediabetic subjects have significantly reduced nuclear Nrf2. The down-regulation of Nrf2 during chronic hyperglycemia has been shown to be a potential treatment target. An important target for preventing diabetes mellitus is the Keap1-Nrf2 system [166]. Statins are some of the most important medicines which almost all patients with DM have to take [167]. They can prevent micro- and macrovascular changes and reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with DM [168]. Most of the patients with DM, even those with normal LDL-cholesterol levels, have to take statins and they have a proven beneficial effect even in these patients [169]. Statins improve endothelial dysfunction in diabetic patients and their beneficial effects may be explained in part by the attenuation of vascular O(2)(-) formation, which is independent of cholesterol lowering [170]. However, the protective mechanisms of statins have not been fully explained. Statins inhibit the production of L-mevalonic acid and prevent not only the synthesis of cholesterol but also the synthesis of isoprenoid intermediates. These intermediates such as farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) are essential in intracellular signal transduction. Small GTP-binding proteins, like Ras and Rho GTPase, are required for the normal structure and function of the cell membrane and statins have effects on a post-translational modification of small GTP-binding proteins. Therefore, statins might have beneficial effects in DM also by the inhibition of Rac-1 activity by reducing the availability of isoprenoid intermediates. It has been shown that long-lasting statin treatment is associated with a small but significant increase in incidence of new-onset type 2 diabetes [171,172]. However, this effect was limited to those who had impaired fasting glucose or multiple components of metabolic syndrome, i.e., those who were already at high risk of developing diabetes [173]. The mechanism of this adverse effect is not clearly understood but it seems that statins might interfere with insulin secretion in pancreatic beta cells, either by decreasing Ca-dependent insulin secretion or by interfering with guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding proteins [174].

4. Conclusions

Statins are drugs with LDL-C-lowering effects but also many pleiotropic effects [86]. Therefore, they might be useful in the treatment of many diseases, not only CVD but also cancer, kidney diseases, liver diseases, lung diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. Statins have a good safety profile when used at recommended doses. Their adverse effects are rare and, like most drugs, occur with higher doses and prolonged treatment. The Nrf2/HO-1 signaling pathway is a protective antioxidative pathway that plays an important role in removing environmental and endogenous stressors; therefore, it is important in preventing the progression of different diseases. Statins have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties which are independent of their LDL-C-lowering effects. Namely, they can significantly increase the DNA-binding activity of Nrf2 and induce the expression of its target genes, such as HO-1 and GPX, thus protecting the cells against oxidative stress. These pleiotropic effects of statins are responsible for the protective mechanisms of these drugs involved in the prevention and/or treatment of several diseases which were already mentioned. By regulating oxidation pathways that control NADPH oxidase, myeloperoxidase, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity, statins promote antioxidant defense and restore redox homeostasis. However, much more data are needed to fully explain these effects of statins as well as more clinical trials to confirm the possible use of statins in the prevention and treatment of these diseases. It has to be stressed that statins, like other drugs, have also some adverse effects. The most prevalent ones are statin associated-muscle symptoms (SAMS) that can present as myalgia, myopathy, myositis with or without creatine kinase (CK) elevation, or in the most severe cases as rhabdomyolysis [175,176,177]. Statins slightly increase the risk of new-onset diabetes (9%) although the cardiovascular benefit outweighs the risk [178,179,180,181,182,183]. Early data indicated that statins raise transaminase. Nevertheless, more recent data suggest that statins can be even beneficial, at least in some liver diseases, e.g., non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [184,185,186]. A similar situation was with the possible adverse effects of statins on kidneys. Earlier studies indicated possible adverse effects of statins on kidneys but more recent studies suggest that statin therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may even slow CKD progression [187,188]. Finally, in the elderly, the evaluation of the validity of a statin prescription should be based on a careful analysis of the patient’s general health, cardiac and peripheral artery evaluation, as well as the presence of metabolic abnormalities or drug interactions potentially leading to a risk of side effects, which are not rare in the very old [189].

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant # 20-15-00264).

Data Availability Statement

Raw data associated with this study are available from the corresponding authors upon a reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Feingold, K.R. Cholesterol Lowering Drugs. 2020. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/books/NBK395573/ (accessed on 21 February 2022).
  2. Reiner, Ž. Statins in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2013, 10, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pinal-Fernandez, I.; Casal-Dominguez, M.; Mammen, A.L. Statins: Pros and cons. Med. Clínica 2018, 150, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nurmohamed, N.S.; Navar, A.M.; Kastelein, J.J.P. New and Emerging Therapies for Reduction of LDL-Cholesterol and Apolipoprotein B: JACC Focus Seminar 1/4. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021, 77, 1564–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ruscica, M.; Ferri, N.; Santos, R.D.; Sirtori, C.R.; Corsini, A. Lipid Lowering Drugs: Present Status and Future Developments. Curr. Atheroscler. Rep. 2021, 23, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sahebkar, A.; Watts, G.F. New therapies targeting apoB metabolism for high-risk patients with inherited dyslipidaemias: What can the clinician expect? Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 2013, 27, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sahebkar, A.; Watts, G.F. New LDL-cholesterol lowering therapies: Pharmacology, clinical trials, and relevance to acute coronary syndromes. Clin. Ther. 2013, 35, 1082–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Almuti, K.; Rimawi, R.; Spevack, D.; Ostfeld, R.J. Effects of statins beyond lipid lowering: Potential for clinical benefits. Int. J. Cardiol. 2006, 109, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Gorabi, A.M.; Kiaie, N.; Pirro, M.; Bianconi, V.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Sahebkar, A. Effects of statins on the biological features of mesenchymal stem cells and therapeutic implications. Heart Fail. Rev. 2020, 26, 1259–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chruściel, P.; Sahebkar, A.; Rembek-Wieliczko, M.; Serban, M.-C.; Ursoniu, S.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Jones, S.R.; Mosteoru, S.; Blaha, M.J.; Martin, S.S. Impact of statin therapy on plasma adiponectin concentrations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 randomized controlled trial arms. Atherosclerosis 2016, 253, 194–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Sahebkar, A.; Serban, M.-C.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Toth, P.P.; Muntner, P.; Ursoniu, S.; Mosterou, S.; Glasser, S.; Martin, S.S.; Jones, S.R. Head-to-head comparison of statins versus fibrates in reducing plasma fibrinogen concentrations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacol. Res. 2016, 103, 236–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bianconi, V.; Sahebkar, A.; Banach, M.; Pirro, M. Statins, haemostatic factors and thrombotic risk. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2017, 32, 460–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pirro, M.; Simental-Mendía, L.E.; Bianconi, V.; Watts, G.F.; Banach, M.; Sahebkar, A. Effect of statin therapy on arterial wall inflammation based on 18F-FDG PET/CT: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sohrevardi, S.M.; Nasab, F.S.; Mirjalili, M.R.; Bagherniya, M.; Tafti, A.D.; Jarrahzadeh, M.H.; Azarpazhooh, M.R.; Saeidmanesh, M.; Banach, M.; Jamialahmadi, T.; et al. Effect of atorvastatin on delirium status of patients in the intensive care unit: A randomized controlled trial. Arch. Med. Sci. 2021, 17, 1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vahedian-Azimi, A.; Mohammadi, S.M.; Beni, F.H.; Banach, M.; Guest, P.C.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Sahebkar, A. Improved COVID-19 ICU admission and mortality outcomes following treatment with statins: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Med. Sci. 2021, 17, 579–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ikezaki, H.; Lim, E.; Cupples, L.A.; Liu, C.T.; Asztalos, B.F.; Schaefer, E.J. Small Dense Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Is the Most Atherogenic Lipoprotein Parameter in the Prospective Framingham Offspring Study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e019140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Witztum, J.L.; Steinberg, D. The oxidative modification hypothesis of atherosclerosis: Does it hold for humans? Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2001, 11, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fattman, C.L.; Schaefer, L.M.; Oury, T.D. Extracellular superoxide dismutase in biology and medicine. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2003, 35, 236–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. ’t Hoen, P.A.; Van der Lans, C.A.; Van Eck, M.; Bijsterbosch, M.K.; Van Berkel, T.J.; Twisk, J. Aorta of ApoE-deficient mice responds to atherogenic stimuli by a prelesional increase and subsequent decrease in the expression of antioxidant enzymes. Circ. Res. 2003, 93, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Aviram, M.; Rosenblat, M.; Billecke, S.; Erogul, J.; Sorenson, R.; Bisgaier, C.L.; Newton, R.S.; La Du, B. Human serum paraoxonase (PON 1) is inactivated by oxidized low density lipoprotein and preserved by antioxidants. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 892–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Girona, J.; La Ville, A.E.; Solà, R.; Plana, N.; Masana, L.s. Simvastatin decreases aldehyde production derived from lipoprotein oxidation. Am. J. Cardiol. 1999, 83, 846–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jaramillo, M.C.; Zhang, D.D. The emerging role of the Nrf2–Keap1 signaling pathway in cancer. Genes Dev. 2013, 27, 2179–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Hayes, J.D.; Dinkova-Kostova, A.T. The Nrf2 regulatory network provides an interface between redox and intermediary metabolism. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2014, 39, 199–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ariens, E.; Simonis, A. General principles of nutritional toxicology. Nutr. Toxicol. 1982, 1, 17–80. [Google Scholar]
  25. Godwill, E.A.; Jane, I.C.; Scholastica, I.U.; Marcellus, U.; Eugene, A.L.; Gloria, O.A. Determination of some soft drink constituents and contamination by some heavy metals in Nigeria. Toxicol. Rep. 2015, 2, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Geng, Y.-J.; Wu, Q.; Muszynski, M.; Hansson, G.r.K.; Libby, P. Apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells induced by In Vitro stimulation with Interferon-γ, tumor necrosis Factor–α, and Interleukin-1β. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1996, 16, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Araujo, J.A.; Meng, L.; Tward, A.D.; Hancock, W.W.; Zhai, Y.; Lee, A.; Ishikawa, K.; Iyer, S.; Buelow, R.; Busuttil, R.W. Systemic rather than local heme oxygenase-1 overexpression improves cardiac allograft outcomes in a new transgenic mouse. J. Immunol. 2003, 171, 1572–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Otterbein, L.E.; Kolls, J.K.; Mantell, L.L.; Cook, J.L.; Alam, J.; Choi, A.M. Exogenous administration of heme oxygenase-1 by gene transfer provides protection against hyperoxia-induced lung injury. J. Clin. Investig. 1999, 103, 1047–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, X.; Ding, M.; Zhu, P.; Huang, H.; Zhuang, Q.; Shen, J.; Cai, Y.; Zhao, M.; He, Q. New Insights into the Nrf-2/HO-1 Signaling Axis and Its Application in Pediatric Respiratory Diseases. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 3214196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Son, Y.; Lee, J.H.; Chung, H.-T.; Pae, H.-O. Therapeutic Roles of Heme Oxygenase-1 in Metabolic Diseases: Curcumin and Resveratrol Analogues as Possible Inducers of Heme Oxygenase-1. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2013, 2013, 639541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ndisang, J.F. Synergistic Interaction Between Heme Oxygenase (HO) and Nuclear-Factor E2- Related Factor-2 (Nrf2) against Oxidative Stress in Cardiovascular Related Diseases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 1465–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Loboda, A.; Damulewicz, M.; Pyza, E.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dulak, J. Role of Nrf2/HO-1 system in development, oxidative stress response and diseases: An evolutionarily conserved mechanism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.: CMLS 2016, 73, 3221–3247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Shishehbor, M.H.; Brennan, M.-L.; Aviles, R.J.; Fu, X.; Penn, M.S.; Sprecher, D.L.; Hazen, S.L. Statins promote potent systemic antioxidant effects through specific inflammatory pathways. Circulation 2003, 108, 426–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bahrami, A.; Parsamanesh, N.; Atkin, S.L.; Banach, M.; Sahebkar, A. Effect of statins on toll-like receptors: A new insight to pleiotropic effects. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 135, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Khalifeh, M.; Penson, P.E.; Banach, M.; Sahebkar, A. Statins as anti-pyroptotic agents. Arch. Med. Sci. 2021, 17, 1414–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shakour, N.; Ruscica, M.; Hadizadeh, F.; Cirtori, C.; Banach, M.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Sahebkar, A. Statins and C-reactive protein: In silico evidence on direct interaction. Arch. Med. Sci. 2020, 16, 1432–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Davignon, J.; Jacob, R.F.; Mason, R.P. The antioxidant effects of statins. Coron. Artery Dis. 2004, 15, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Habeos, I.G.; Ziros, P.G.; Chartoumpekis, D.; Psyrogiannis, A.; Kyriazopoulou, V.; Papavassiliou, A.G. Simvastatin activates Keap1/Nrf2 signaling in rat liver. J. Mol. Med. 2008, 86, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chartoumpekis, D.; Ziros, P.G.; Psyrogiannis, A.; Kyriazopoulou, V.; Papavassiliou, A.G.; Habeos, I.G. Simvastatin lowers reactive oxygen species level by Nrf2 activation via PI3K/Akt pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 396, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nowak, W.N.; Taha, H.; Markiewicz, J.; Kachamakova-Trojanowska, N.; Stępniewski, J.; Klóska, D.; Florczyk-Soluch, U.; Niżankowski, R.; Frołow, M.; Walter, Z. Atorvastatin and conditioned media from atorvastatin-treated human hematopoietic stem/progenitor-derived cells show proangiogenic activity in vitro but not in vivo. Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 1868170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Mouawad, C.A.; Mrad, M.F.; Al-Hariri, M.; Soussi, H.; Hamade, E.; Alam, J.; Habib, A. Role of nitric oxide and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein transcription factor in statin-dependent induction of heme oxygenase-1 in mouse macrophages. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee, T.-S.; Chang, C.-C.; Zhu, Y.; Shyy, J.Y.-J. Simvastatin induces heme oxygenase-1: A novel mechanism of vessel protection. Circulation 2004, 110, 1296–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Pinho-Ribeiro, V.; Melo, A.C.; Kennedy-Feitosa, E.; Graca-Reis, A.; Barroso, M.V.; Cattani-Cavalieri, I.; Carvalho, G.M.C.; Zin, W.A.; Porto, L.C.; Gitirana, L.B. Atorvastatin and simvastatin promoted mouse lung repair after cigarette smoke-induced emphysema. Inflammation 2017, 40, 965–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. El-Achkar, G.A.; Mrad, M.F.; Mouawad, C.A.; Badran, B.; Jaffa, A.A.; Motterlini, R.; Hamade, E.; Habib, A. Heme oxygenase-1—Dependent anti-inflammatory effects of atorvastatin in zymosan-injected subcutaneous air pouch in mice. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216405. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lin, C.-C.; Lin, W.-N.; Cho, R.-L.; Yang, C.-C.; Yeh, Y.-C.; Hsiao, L.-D.; Tseng, H.-C.; Yang, C.-M. Induction of HO-1 by mevastatin mediated via a Nox/ROS-dependent c-Src/PDGFRα/PI3K/Akt/Nrf2/ARE cascade suppresses TNF-α-induced lung inflammation. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Hsu, H.-H.; Ko, W.-J.; Hsu, J.-Y.; Chen, J.-S.; Lee, Y.-C.; Lai, I.-R.; Chen, C.-F. Simvastatin ameliorates established pulmonary hypertension through a heme oxygenase-1 dependent pathway in rats. Respir. Res. 2009, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zhang, W.-h.; Zhang, Y.-j.; Liu, C.-p.; Yu, B.-x.; Lu, W.-x. Simvastatin protects against the development of monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension in rats via a heme oxygenase-1–dependent pathway. Exp. Lung Res. 2011, 37, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sun, G.; Li, Y.; Ji, Z. Atorvastatin attenuates inflammation and oxidative stress induced by ischemia/reperfusion in rat heart via the Nrf2 transcription factor. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 14837. [Google Scholar]
  49. Rodrigues, G.; Moreira, A.J.; Bona, S.; Schemitt, E.; Marroni, C.A.; Di Naso, F.C.; Dias, A.S.; Pires, T.R.; Picada, J.N.; Marroni, N.P. Simvastatin reduces hepatic oxidative stress and endoplasmic reticulum stress in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis experimental model. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 3201873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. McGregor, G.H.; Campbell, A.D.; Fey, S.K.; Tumanov, S.; Sumpton, D.; Blanco, G.R.; Mackay, G.; Nixon, C.; Vazquez, A.; Sansom, O.J. Targeting the metabolic response to statin-mediated oxidative stress produces a synergistic antitumor response. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Hsieh, C.-H.; Sun, C.-K.; Lu, T.-H.; Chen, Y.-C.; Lin, C.-J.; Wu, C.-J.; Rau, C.-S.; Jeng, S.-F. Simvastatin induces heme oxygenase-1 expression but fails to reduce inflammation in the capsule surrounding a silicone shell implant in rats. J. Surg. Res. 2011, 168, 272–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, K.J.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, N.R.; Chin, H.S. Effects of simvastatin on the expression of heme oxygenase-1 in human RPE cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 6456–6464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Chen, J.-C.; Huang, K.-C.; Lin, W.-W. HMG–CoA reductase inhibitors upregulate heme oxygenase-1 expression in murine RAW264. 7 macrophages via ERK, p38 MAPK and protein kinase G pathways. Cell. Signal. 2006, 18, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yang, C.-M.; Lin, C.-C.; Yang, C.-C.; Cho, R.-L.; Hsiao, L.-D. Mevastatin-Induced AP-1-Dependent HO-1 Expression Suppresses Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1 Expression and Monocyte Adhesion on Human Pulmonary Alveolar Epithelial Cells Challenged with TNF-α. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Ihoriya, C.; Satoh, M.; Komai, N.; Sasaki, T.; Kashihara, N. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 is activated by rosuvastatin via p21cip1 upregulation in endothelial cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 4, 501–2167. [Google Scholar]
  56. Leung, P.-O.; Wang, S.-H.; Lu, S.-H.; Chou, W.-H.; Shiau, C.-Y.; Chou, T.-C. Simvastatin inhibits pro-inflammatory mediators through induction of heme oxygenase-1 expression in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264. 7 macrophages. Toxicol. Lett. 2011, 207, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hwang, A.-R.; Han, J.-H.; Lim, J.H.; Kang, Y.J.; Woo, C.-H. Fluvastatin inhibits AGE-induced cell proliferation and migration via an ERK5-dependent Nrf2 pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Makabe, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Watanabe, H.; Murakami, M.; Ohba, T.; Ito, H. Fluvastatin protects vascular smooth muscle cells against oxidative stress through the Nrf2-dependent antioxidant pathway. Atherosclerosis 2010, 213, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pantan, R.; Tocharus, J.; Suksamrarn, A.; Tocharus, C. Synergistic effect of atorvastatin and Cyanidin-3-glucoside on angiotensin II-induced inflammation in vascular smooth muscle cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2016, 342, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yeh, Y.-H.; Kuo, C.-T.; Chang, G.-J.; Chen, Y.-H.; Lai, Y.-J.; Cheng, M.-L.; Chen, W.-J. Rosuvastatin suppresses atrial tachycardia-induced cellular remodeling via Akt/Nrf2/heme oxygenase-1 pathway. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2015, 82, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kwok, S.C.; Samuel, S.P.; Handal, J. Atorvastatin activates heme oxygenase-1 at the stress response elements. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2012, 16, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dulak, J.; Loboda, A.; Jazwa, A.; Zagorska, A.; Dörler, J.; Alber, H.; Dichtl, W.; Weidinger, F.; Frick, M.; Jozkowicz, A. Atorvastatin affects several angiogenic mediators in human endothelial cells. Endothelium 2005, 12, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Loboda, A.; Jazwa, A.; Jozkowicz, A.; Dorosz, J.; Balla, J.; Molema, G.; Dulak, J. Atorvastatin prevents hypoxia-induced inhibition of endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression but does not affect heme oxygenase-1 in human microvascular endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis 2006, 187, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Barnett, M.; Hall, S.; Dixit, M.; Arany, I. Simvastatin attenuates oleic acid-induced oxidative stress through CREB-dependent induction of heme oxygenase-1 in renal proximal tubule cells. Pediatric Res. 2016, 79, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Yan, J.; Qiao, L.; Wu, J.; Fan, H.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y. Simvastatin protects dopaminergic neurons against MPP+-induced oxidative stress and regulates the endogenous anti-oxidant system through ERK. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 51, 1957–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Grosser, N.; Hemmerle, A.; Berndt, G.; Erdmann, K.; Hinkelmann, U.; Schürger, S.; Wijayanti, N.; Immenschuh, S.; Schröder, H. The antioxidant defense protein heme oxygenase 1 is a novel target for statins in endothelial cells. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2004, 37, 2064–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hsieh, C.-H.; Rau, C.-S.; Hsieh, M.-W.; Chen, Y.-C.; Jeng, S.-F.; Lu, T.-H.; Chen, S.-S. Simvastatin-induced heme oxygenase-1 increases apoptosis of Neuro 2A cells in response to glucose deprivation. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 101, 112–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Benjamin, E.J.; Blaha, M.J.; Chiuve, S.E.; Cushman, M.; Das, S.R.; Deo, R.; De Ferranti, S.D.; Floyd, J.; Fornage, M.; Gillespie, C. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 135, e146–e603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, H.; Lai, Y.; Mathis, B.J.; Wang, W.; Li, S.; Qu, C.; Li, B.; Shao, L.; Song, H.; Janicki, J.S. Deubiquitinating enzyme CYLD mediates pressure overload-induced cardiac maladaptive remodeling and dysfunction via downregulating Nrf2. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2015, 84, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bata, I.R.; Gregor, R.D.; Wolf, H.K.; Brownell, B. Trends in five-year survival of patients discharged after acute myocardial infarction. Can. J. Cardiol. 2006, 22, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Tyldum, G.A.; Schjerve, I.E.; Tjønna, A.E.; Kirkeby-Garstad, I.; Stølen, T.O.; Richardson, R.S.; Wisløff, U. Endothelial dysfunction induced by post-prandial lipemia: Complete protection afforded by high-intensity aerobic interval exercise. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2009, 53, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Johansson, S.; Rosengren, A.; Young, K.; Jennings, E. Mortality and morbidity trends after the first year in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2017, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Tjia, J.; Allison, J.; Saczynski, J.S.; Tisminetzky, M.; Givens, J.L.; Lapane, K.; Lessard, D.; Goldberg, R.J. Encouraging trends in acute myocardial infarction survival in the oldest old. Am. J. Med. 2013, 126, 798–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Januzzi Jr, J. Troponin testing after cardiac surgery. HSR Proc. Intensive Care Cardiovasc. Anesth. 2009, 1, 22. [Google Scholar]
  75. Chen, J.; Liu, B.; Yuan, J.; Yang, J.; Zhang, J.; An, Y.; Tie, L.; Pan, Y.; Li, X. Atorvastatin reduces vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in human non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) via inhibition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Mol. Oncol. 2012, 6, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Bae, S.K.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, Y.G.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, J.W.; Kim, T.; Lee, M.G. Interspecies pharmacokinetic scaling of oltipraz in mice, rats, rabbits and dogs, and prediction of human pharmacokinetics. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 2005, 26, 99–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Almeida, S.O.; Budoff, M. Effect of statins on atherosclerotic plaque. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2019, 29, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Barnes, P.J. Future treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its comorbidities. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2008, 5, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Athanazio, R. Airway disease: Similarities and differences between asthma, COPD and bronchiectasis. Clinics 2012, 67, 1335–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Marin, L.; Colombo, P.; Bebawy, M.; Young, P.M.; Traini, D. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Patho-physiology, current methods of treatment and the potential for simvastatin in disease management. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2011, 8, 1205–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mehrbod, P.; Omar, A.R.; Hair-Bejo, M.; Haghani, A.; Ideris, A. Mechanisms of action and efficacy of statins against influenza. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 872370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Liao, J.K.; Laufs, U. Pleiotropic effects of statins. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005, 45, 89–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Momo, K.; Takagi, A.; Miyaji, A.; Koinuma, M. Assessment of statin-induced interstitial pneumonia in patients treated for hyperlipidemia using a health insurance claims database in Japan. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018, 50, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jo, T.; Michihata, N.; Yamana, H.; Morita, K.; Ishimaru, M.; Yamauchi, Y.; Hasegawa, W.; Urushiyama, H.; Uda, K.; Matsui, H. Risk of drug-induced interstitial lung disease in hospitalised patients: A nested case–control study. Thorax 2021, 76, 1193–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kim, J.W.; Barrett, K.; Loke, Y.; Wilson, A.M. The effect of statin therapy on disease-related outcomes in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir. Med. Res. 2021, 80, 100792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kang, J.; Jeong, S.-M.; Shin, D.W.; Cho, M.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, J. The associations of aspirin, statins, and metformin with lung cancer risk and related mortality: A time-dependent analysis of population-based nationally representative data. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2021, 16, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Coresh, J.; Astor, B.C.; Greene, T.; Eknoyan, G.; Levey, A.S. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2003, 41, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Levey, A.S.; Coresh, J.; Bolton, K.; Culleton, B.; Harvey, K.S.; Ikizler, T.A.; Johnson, C.A.; Kausz, A.; Kimmel, P.L.; Kusek, J. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2002, 39, S1–S266. [Google Scholar]
  89. Kopple, J.D. National kidney foundation K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal failure. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2001, 37, S66–S70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sarnak, M.J.; Levey, A.S.; Schoolwerth, A.C.; Coresh, J.; Culleton, B.; Hamm, L.L.; McCullough, P.A.; Kasiske, B.L.; Kelepouris, E.; Klag, M.J. Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: A statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2003, 108, 2154–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. O’Donnell, M.P.; Kasiske, B.L.; Katz, S.A.; Schmitz, P.G.; Keane, W.F. Lovastatin but not enalapril reduces glomerular injury in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hypertension 1992, 20, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Rubin, R.; Silbiger, S.; Sablay, L.; Neugarten, J. Combined antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy in experimental glomerulonephritis. Hypertension 1994, 23, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Vázquez-Pérez, S.; Aragoncillo, P.; de las Heras, N.; Navarro-Cid, J.; Cediel, E.; Sanz-Rosa, D.; Ruilope, L.M.; Díaz, C.; Hernández, G.; Lahera, V. Atorvastatin prevents glomerulosclerosis and renal endothelial dysfunction in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2001, 16, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Epstein, M.; Campese, V.M. Pleiotropic effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors on renal function. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2005, 45, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Blanco-Colio, L.M.; Tuñón, J.; Martín-Ventura, J.L.; Egido, J. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of statins. Kidney Int. 2003, 63, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Zhang, Y.; Rong, S.; Feng, Y.; Zhao, L.; Hong, J.; Wang, R.; Yuan, W. Simvastatin attenuates renal ischemia/reperfusion injury from oxidative stress via targeting Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Exp. Ther. Med. 2017, 14, 4460–4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Shlipak, M.G.; Fried, L.F.; Crump, C.; Bleyer, A.J.; Manolio, T.A.; Tracy, R.P.; Furberg, C.D.; Psaty, B.M. Elevations of inflammatory and procoagulant biomarkers in elderly persons with renal insufficiency. Circulation 2003, 107, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Verma, A.; Ranganna, K.M.; Reddy, R.S.; Verma, M.; Gordon, N.F. Effect of rosuvastatin on C-reactive protein and renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am. J. Cardiol. 2005, 96, 1290–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Loria, P.; Lonardo, A.; Bellentani, S.; Day, C.; Marchesini, G.; Carulli, N. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cardiovascular disease: An open question. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2007, 17, 684–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Targher, G.; Bertolini, L.; Padovani, R.; Rodella, S.; Arcaro, G.; Day, C. Differences and similarities in early atherosclerosis between patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and chronic hepatitis B and C. J. Hepatol. 2007, 46, 1126–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Longo, M.; Crosignani, A.; Battezzati, P.; Giussani, C.S.; Invernizzi, P.; Zuin, M.; Podda, M. Hyperlipidaemic state and cardiovascular risk in primary biliary cirrhosis. Gut 2002, 51, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Dongiovanni, P.; Paolini, E.; Corsini, A.; Sirtori, C.; Ruscica, M. NAFLD or MAFLD diagnoses and cardiovascular diseases: From epidemiology to drug approaches. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 51, e13519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Jasiñska, M.; Owczarek, J.; Orszulak-Michalak, D. -Statins: A new insight into their mechanisms of action and consequent pleiotropic effects. Pharmacol. Rep. 2007, 59, 483. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Ridker, P.M.; Rifai, N.; Clearfield, M.; Downs, J.R.; Weis, S.E.; Miles, J.S.; Gotto Jr, A.M. Measurement of C-reactive protein for the targeting of statin therapy in the primary prevention of acute coronary events. New Engl. J. Med. 2001, 344, 1959–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Shitara, Y.; Sugiyama, Y. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors: Drug–drug interactions and interindividual differences in transporter and metabolic enzyme functions. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 112, 71–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Zhou, Z.; Rahme, E.; Pilote, L. Are statins created equal? Evidence from randomized trials of pravastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin for cardiovascular disease prevention. Am. Heart J. 2006, 151, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Moosmann, B.; Behl, C. Selenoproteins, cholesterol-lowering drugs, and the consequences revisiting of the mevalonate pathway. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2004, 14, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. WEISS, S.L.; SUNDE, R.A. Cis-acting elements are required for selenium regulation of glutathione peroxidase-1 mRNA levels. Rna 1998, 4, 816–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Athyros, V.G.; Tziomalos, K.; Gossios, T.D.; Griva, T.; Anagnostis, P.; Kargiotis, K.; Pagourelias, E.D.; Theocharidou, E.; Karagiannis, A.; Mikhailidis, D.P. Safety and efficacy of long-term statin treatment for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease and abnormal liver tests in the Greek Atorvastatin and Coronary Heart Disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study: A post-hoc analysis. Lancet 2010, 376, 1916–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fraunfelder, F. Ocular examination before initiation of lovastatin (Mevacor) therapy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1988, 105, 91–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Congdon, N.G.; Friedman, D.S.; Lietman, T. Important causes of visual impairment in the world today. JAMA 2003, 290, 2057–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. VanderBeek, B.L.; Zacks, D.N.; Talwar, N.; Nan, B.; Stein, J.D. Role of statins in the development and progression of age-related macular degeneration. Retina 2013, 33, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Stein, J.D.; Newman-Casey, P.A.; Talwar, N.; Nan, B.; Richards, J.E.; Musch, D.C. The relationship between statin use and open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2012, 119, 2074–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Marcus, M.W.; Müskens, R.P.; Ramdas, W.D.; Wolfs, R.C.; De Jong, P.T.; Vingerling, J.R.; Hofman, A.; Stricker, B.H.; Jansonius, N.M. Cholesterol-lowering drugs and incident open-angle glaucoma: A population-based cohort study. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e29724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Vajaranant, T.S.; Wu, S.; Torres, M.; Varma, R. The changing face of primary open-angle glaucoma in the United States: Demographic and geographic changes from 2011 to 2050. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 154, 303–314.e303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Hui, Q.; Karlstetter, M.; Xu, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhou, L.; Eilken, H.M.; Terjung, C.; Cho, H.; Gong, J.; Lai, M.J. Inhibition of the Keap1-Nrf2 protein-protein interaction protects retinal cells and ameliorates retinal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Free. Radic. Biol. Med. 2020, 146, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Nagaoka, T.; Takahashi, A.; Sato, E.; Izumi, N.; Hein, T.W.; Kuo, L.; Yoshida, A. Effect of systemic administration of simvastatin on retinal circulation. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2006, 124, 665–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Schmeer, C.; Kretz, A.; Isenmann, S. Statin-mediated protective effects in the central nervous system: General mechanisms and putative role of stress proteins. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2006, 24, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  119. Wong, W.W.; Dimitroulakos, J.; Minden, M.; Penn, L. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and the malignant cell: The statin family of drugs as triggers of tumor-specific apoptosis. Leukemia 2002, 16, 508–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Chan, K.K.; Oza, A.M.; Siu, L.L. The statins as anticancer agents. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003, 9, 10–19. [Google Scholar]
  121. Mannello, F.; Tonti, G.A. Statins and breast cancer: May matrix metalloproteinase be the missing link. Cancer Investig. 2009, 27, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Denoyelle, C.; Albanese, P.; Uzan, G.; Hong, L.; Vannier, J.-P.; Soria, J.; Soria, C. Molecular mechanism of the anti-cancer activity of cerivastatin, an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, on aggressive human breast cancer cells. Cell. Signal. 2003, 15, 327–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Seeger, H.; Wallwiener, D.; Mueck, A. Statins can inhibit proliferation of human breast cancer cells in vitro. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2003, 111, 47–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Padayatty, S.; Marcelli, M.; Shao, T.; Cunningham, G. Lovastatin-induced apoptosis in prostate stromal cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 82, 1434–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wächtershäuser, A.; Akoglu, B.; Stein, J. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor mevastatin enhances the growth inhibitory effect of butyrate in the colorectal carcinoma cell line Caco-2. Carcinogenesis 2001, 22, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Hawk, M.A.; Cesen, K.T.; Siglin, J.C.; Stoner, G.D.; Ruch, R.J. Inhibition of lung tumor cell growth in vitro and mouse lung tumor formation by lovastatin. Cancer Lett. 1996, 109, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Blais, L.; Desgagné, A.; LeLorier, J. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors and the risk of cancer: A nested case-control study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2000, 160, 2363–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Haukka, J.; Sankila, R.; Klaukka, T.; Lonnqvist, J.; Niskanen, L.; Tanskanen, A.; Wahlbeck, K.; Tiihonen, J. Incidence of cancer and statin usage—record linkage study. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 126, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Desai, P.; Chlebowski, R.; Cauley, J.A.; Manson, J.E.; Wu, C.; Martin, L.W.; Jay, A.; Bock, C.; Cote, M.; Petrucelli, N. Prospective analysis of association between statin use and breast cancer risk in the women’s health initiative. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2013, 22, 1868–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Ren, Q.-W.; Yu, S.-Y.; Teng, T.-H.K.; Li, X.; Cheung, K.-S.; Wu, M.-Z.; Li, H.-L.; Wong, P.-F.; Tse, H.-F.; Lam, C.S. Statin associated lower cancer risk and related mortality in patients with heart failure. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 3049–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Eliassen, A.H.; Colditz, G.A.; Rosner, B.; Willett, W.C.; Hankinson, S.E. Serum lipids, lipid-lowering drugs, and the risk of breast cancer. Arch. Intern. Med. 2005, 165, 2264–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Boudreau, D.M.; Yu, O.; Miglioretti, D.L.; Buist, D.S.; Heckbert, S.R.; Daling, J.R. Statin use and breast cancer risk in a large population-based setting. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2007, 16, 416–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Friis, S.; Poulsen, A.H.; Johnsen, S.P.; McLaughlin, J.K.; Fryzek, J.P.; Dalton, S.O.; Sørensen, H.T.; Olsen, J.H. Cancer risk among statin users: A population-based cohort study. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 114, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Friedman, G.D.; Flick, E.D.; Udaltsova, N.; Chan Pharm, D.J.; Quesenberry, C.P., Jr.; Habel, L.A. Screening statins for possible carcinogenic risk: Up to 9 years of follow-up of 361 859 recipients. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2008, 17, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Graaf, M.R.; Beiderbeck, A.B.; Egberts, A.C.; Richel, D.J.; Guchelaar, H.-J. The risk of cancer in users of statins. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004, 22, 2388–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Coogan, P.F.; Rosenberg, L.; Strom, B.L. Statin use and the risk of 10 cancers. Epidemiology 2007, 18, 213–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Zielinski, S.L. Following positive epidemiologic studies, statins to enter clinical trials for cancer prevention. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005, 97, 1172–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Brookhart, M.A.; Patrick, A.R.; Dormuth, C.; Avorn, J.; Shrank, W.; Cadarette, S.M.; Solomon, D.H. Adherence to lipid-lowering therapy and the use of preventive health services: An investigation of the healthy user effect. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 166, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Group, C.f.t.A.C.R. The antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial. Major outcomes in moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin vs usual care: The antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT-LLT). JAMA 2002, 288, 2981–2997. [Google Scholar]
  140. Ford, I.; Murray, H.; Packard, C.J.; Shepherd, J.; Macfarlane, P.W.; Cobbe, S.M. Long-term follow-up of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. New Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 1477–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sivaprasad, U.; Abbas, T.; Dutta, A. Differential efficacy of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitors on the cell cycle of prostate cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 2310–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Duncan, R.E.; El-Sohemy, A.; Archer, M.C. Statins and cancer development. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2005, 14, 1897–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Hamilton, R.J.; Goldberg, K.C.; Platz, E.A.; Freedland, S.J. The influence of statin medications on prostate-specific antigen levels. JNCI J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2008, 100, 1511–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Platz, E.A.; Leitzmann, M.F.; Visvanathan, K.; Rimm, E.B.; Stampfer, M.J.; Willett, W.C.; Giovannucci, E. Statin drugs and risk of advanced prostate cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006, 98, 1819–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Flick, E.D.; Habel, L.A.; Chan, K.A.; Van Den Eeden, S.K.; Quinn, V.P.; Haque, R.; Orav, E.J.; Seeger, J.D.; Sadler, M.C.; Quesenberry, C.P. Statin use and risk of prostate cancer in the California Men’s Health Study cohort. Cancer Epidemiol. Prev. Biomark. 2007, 16, 2218–2225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Tenhunen, R.; Marver, H.S.; Schmid, R. The enzymatic conversion of heme to bilirubin by microsomal heme oxygenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1968, 61, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Itoh, K.; Wakabayashi, N.; Katoh, Y.; Ishii, T.; Igarashi, K.; Engel, J.D.; Yamamoto, M. Keap1 represses nuclear activation of antioxidant responsive elements by Nrf2 through binding to the amino-terminal Neh2 domain. Genes Dev. 1999, 13, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Rock, R.B.; Gekker, G.; Hu, S.; Sheng, W.S.; Cheeran, M.; Lokensgard, J.R.; Peterson, P.K. Role of microglia in central nervous system infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Garzón, D.; Cabezas, R.; Vega, N.; Ávila-Rodriguez, M.; Gonzalez, J.; Gómez, R.M.; Echeverria, V.; Aliev, G.; Barreto, G.E. Novel approaches in astrocyte protection: From experimental methods to computational approaches. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2016, 58, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Kipnis, J. Multifaceted interactions between adaptive immunity and the central nervous system. Science 2016, 353, 766–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Greter, M.; Merad, M. Regulation of microglia development and homeostasis. Glia 2013, 61, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Wu, T.; Tan, L.; Cheng, N.; Yan, Q.; Zhang, Y.-F.; Liu, C.-J.; Shi, B. PNIPAAM modified mesoporous hydroxyapatite for sustained osteogenic drug release and promoting cell attachment. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2016, 62, 888–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Thameem Dheen, S.; Kaur, C.; Ling, E.-A. Microglial activation and its implications in the brain diseases. Curr. Med. Chem. 2007, 14, 1189–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Du, L.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.-L. Role of microglia in neurological disorders and their potentials as a therapeutic target. Mol. Neurobiol. 2017, 54, 7567–7584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Bachiller, S.; Jiménez-Ferrer, I.; Paulus, A.; Yang, Y.; Swanberg, M.; Deierborg, T.; Boza-Serrano, A. Microglia in neurological diseases: A road map to brain-disease dependent-inflammatory response. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Parizadeh, S.M.; Azarpazhooh, M.R.; Moohebati, M.; Nematy, M.; Ghayour-Mobarhan, M.; Tavallaie, S.; Rahsepar, A.A.; Amini, M.; Sahebkar, A.; Mohammadi, M. Simvastatin therapy reduces prooxidant-antioxidant balance: Results of a placebo-controlled cross-over trial. Lipids 2011, 46, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Sahebkar, A.; Serban, C.; Ursoniu, S.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Undas, A.; Lip, G.Y.; Bittner, V.; Ray, K.K.; Watts, G.F.; Kees Hovingh, G. The impact of statin therapy on plasma levels of von Willebrand factor antigen: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials. Thromb. Haemost. 2016, 115, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. van der Most, P.J.; Dolga, A.M.; Nijholt, I.M.; Luiten, P.G.; Eisel, U.L. Statins: Mechanisms of neuroprotection. Prog. Neurobiol. 2009, 88, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. McFarland, A.; Davey, A.; Anoopkumar-Dukie, S. Statins reduce lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine and inflammatory mediator release in an in vitro model of microglial-like cells. Mediat. Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 2582745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  160. Chen, X.; Yan, L.; Guo, Z.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Li, M.; Huang, C.; Zhang, X.; Chen, L. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote the survival of fat grafts via crosstalk between the Nrf2 and TLR4 pathways. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Huang, J.; Shen, X.-D.; Yue, S.; Zhu, J.; Gao, F.; Zhai, Y.; Busuttil, R.W.; Ke, B.; Kupiec-Weglinski, J.W. Adoptive transfer of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1)-modified macrophages rescues the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (Nrf2) antiinflammatory phenotype in liver ischemia/reperfusion injury. Mol. Med. 2014, 20, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Kang, K.; Kim, Y.; Kim, Y.; Roh, J.; Nam, J.; Kim, P.; Ryu, W.; Lee, S.; Yoon, B. Lithium pretreatment reduces brain injury after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. Neurol. Res. 2012, 34, 447–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Bagheri, H.; Ghasemi, F.; Barreto, G.E.; Sathyapalan, T.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Sahebkar, A. The effects of statins on microglial cells to protect against neurodegenerative disorders: A mechanistic review. BioFactors 2020, 46, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. King, G.L.; Buzney, S.M.; Kahn, C.R.; Hetu, N.; Buchwald, S.; Macdonald, S.; Rand, L. Differential responsiveness to insulin of endothelial and support cells from micro-and macrovessels. J. Clin. Investig. 1983, 71, 974–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. He, X.; Kan, H.; Cai, L.; Ma, Q. Nrf2 is critical in defense against high glucose-induced oxidative damage in cardiomyocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2009, 46, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Cheng, X.; Chapple, S.J.; Patel, B.; Puszyk, W.; Sugden, D.; Yin, X.; Mayr, M.; Siow, R.C.; Mann, G.E. Gestational diabetes mellitus impairs Nrf2-mediated adaptive antioxidant defenses and redox signaling in fetal endothelial cells in utero. Diabetes 2013, 62, 4088–4097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Meigs, J.B.; O’Donnell, C.J.; Tofler, G.H.; Benjamin, E.J.; Fox, C.S.; Lipinska, I.; Nathan, D.M.; Sullivan, L.M.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Wilson, P.W. Hemostatic markers of endothelial dysfunction and risk of incident type 2 diabetes: The Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes 2006, 55, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Sakamoto, K.; Murata, T.; Chuma, H.; Hori, M.; Ozaki, H. Fluvastatin prevents vascular hyperplasia by inhibiting phenotype modulation and proliferation through extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase inactivation in organ-cultured artery. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005, 25, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Group, H.P.S.C. Cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in people at different levels of vascular disease risk: Economic analysis of a randomised trial in 20 536 individuals. Lancet 2005, 365, 1779–1785. [Google Scholar]
  170. Christ, M.; Bauersachs, J.; Liebetrau, C.; Heck, M.; Günther, A.; Wehling, M. Glucose increases endothelial-dependent superoxide formation in coronary arteries by NAD (P) H oxidase activation: Attenuation by the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor atorvastatin. Diabetes 2002, 51, 2648–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Rajpathak, S.N.; Kumbhani, D.J.; Crandall, J.; Barzilai, N.; Alderman, M.; Ridker, P.M. Statin therapy and risk of developing type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2009, 32, 1924–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  172. Sattar, N.; Preiss, D.; Murray, H.M.; Welsh, P.; Buckley, B.M.; de Craen, A.J.; Seshasai, S.R.K.; McMurray, J.J.; Freeman, D.J.; Jukema, J.W. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: A collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet 2010, 375, 735–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Ridker, P.M.; Pradhan, A.; MacFadyen, J.G.; Libby, P.; Glynn, R.J. Cardiovascular benefits and diabetes risks of statin therapy in primary prevention: An analysis from the JUPITER trial. Lancet 2012, 380, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Xia, F.; Xie, L.; Mihic, A.; Gao, X.; Chen, Y.; Gaisano, H.Y.; Tsushima, R.G. Inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis impairs insulin secretion and voltage-gated calcium channel function in pancreatic β-cells. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 5136–5145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  175. Magni, P.; Macchi, C.; Morlotti, B.; Sirtori, C.R.; Ruscica, M. Risk identification and possible countermeasures for muscle adverse effects during statin therapy. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2015, 26, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Ward, N.C.; Watts, G.F.; Eckel, R.H. Statin Toxicity. Circ. Res. 2019, 124, 328–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Bytyci, I.; Bajraktari, G.; Sahebkar, A.; Penson, P.E.; Rysz, R.; Banach, M.Y. The prevalence of statin intolerance worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis with 4,143,517 patients. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, ehab724.2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Mach, F.; Ray, K.K.; Wiklund, O.; Corsini, A.; Catapano, A.L.; Bruckert, E.; De Backer, G.; Hegele, R.A.; Hovingh, G.K.; Jacobson, T.A.; et al. Adverse effects of statin therapy: Perception vs. the evidence—Focus on glucose homeostasis, cognitive, renal and hepatic function, haemorrhagic stroke and cataract. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 2526–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Bouitbir, J.; Charles, A.-L.; Rasseneur, L.; Dufour, S.; Piquard, F.; Geny, B.; Zoll, J. Atorvastatin treatment reduces exercise capacities in rats: Involvement of mitochondrial impairments and oxidative stress. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011, 111, 1477–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  180. Liu, A.; Wu, Q.; Guo, J.; Ares, I.; Rodríguez, J.-L.; Martínez-Larrañaga, M.-R.; Yuan, Z.; Anadón, A.; Wang, X.; Martínez, M.-A. Statins: Adverse reactions, oxidative stress and metabolic interactions. Pharmacol. Ther. 2019, 195, 54–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Mollazadeh, H.; Tavana, E.; Fanni, G.; Bo, S.; Banach, M.; Pirro, M.; Von Haehling, S.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Sahebkar, A. Effects of statins on mitochondrial pathways. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2021, 12, 237–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Pal, S.; Ghosh, M.; Ghosh, S.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Sil, P.C. Atorvastatin induced hepatic oxidative stress and apoptotic damage via MAPKs, mitochondria, calpain and caspase12 dependent pathways. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 83, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Bouitbir, J.; Charles, A.-L.; Echaniz-Laguna, A.; Kindo, M.; Daussin, F.; Auwerx, J.; Piquard, F.; Geny, B.; Zoll, J. Opposite effects of statins on mitochondria of cardiac and skeletal muscles: A ‘mitohormesis’ mechanism involving reactive oxygen species and PGC-1. Eur. Heart J. 2012, 33, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Pastori, D.; Pani, A.; Di Rocco, A.; Menichelli, D.; Gazzaniga, G.; Farcomeni, A.; D’Erasmo, L.; Angelico, F.; Del Ben, M.; Baratta, F. Statin liver safety in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and metanalysis. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2022, 88, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Vahedian-Azimi, A.; Shojaie, S.; Banach, M.; Heidari, F.; Cicero, A.F.; Khoshfetrat, M.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Sahebkar, A. Statin therapy in chronic viral hepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of nine studies with 195,602 participants. Ann. Med. 2021, 53, 1228–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Xu, J.; Mukherjee, S. State laws that authorize pharmacists to prescribe naloxone are associated with increased naloxone dispensing in retail pharmacies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021, 227, 109012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Zhao, L.; Li, S.; Gao, Y. Efficacy of statins on renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ren. Fail. 2021, 43, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Simic, I.; Reiner, Z. Adverse effects of statins-myths and reality. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2015, 21, 1220–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Ruscica, M.; Macchi, C.; Pavanello, C.; Corsini, A.; Sahebkar, A.; Sirtori, C.R. Appropriateness of statin prescription in the elderly. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2018, 50, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 11 01313 g001 550
Figure 1. Conserved domains of Nrf2.
Figure 1. Conserved domains of Nrf2.
Jcm 11 01313 g001
Table
Table 1. Summary of in vivo studies investigating statin effect in various diseases.
Table 1. Summary of in vivo studies investigating statin effect in various diseases.
AnimalModelDiseasesStatin TypeDoseDurationMain EffectRef
MiceFoxn1nu miceDiabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseasesAtorvastatin30 μmol/L2 weeksAtorvastatin-treated precursors of myeloid angiogenic cells (PAC) — no effect on angiogenesis[40]
MiceBALB/c or C57BL/6 miceInflammatory diseasesSimvastatin and fluvastatin5 mM simvastatin and 2 mM fluvastatin;6, 12 or 24 hStatins have anti-inflammatory effects and induce HO-1 in primary macrophages[41]
Micemale C57BL/6J miceCoronary heart diseaseSimvastatin(0.75 to 5 mg/kg)3, 6, 12, or 24 hSimvastatin activates HO-1, HO-1 have cytoprotective effects, HO-1 are delivered to hearts and vessels of animal models in order to study myocardial protection—statins cause cardiovascular damage[42]
Micemale C57BL/6 miceChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)Atorvastatin and simvastatin1 mg/mL60 daysAtorvastatin and simvastatin improve the repair of lung damage in mice exposed to cigarettes[43]
C57BL/6J female miceInflammatory lung diseasesAtorvastatin5 mg/kg10 daysStatins have anti-inflammatory effect by influencing HO-1 pathway in vivo[44]
Mice Inflammatory lung diseasesMevastatin0.1 mg/kg body weight24 hMevastatin reduces TNF-α induced ICAM-1 expression via p47phox/Nox/ROS/c-Src/PDGFR_/PI3K/Akt/Nrf2/ARE/HO-1 - statins have beneficial effects in inflammatory lung diseases[45]
Rats(MCT-PH) and (CH-PH) ratsPulmonary hypertensionSimvastatin(10 mg/kgwdays 21~23)Simvastatin decreases the severity of PH in two rat models (MCT- and CH-PH) by influencing HO-1 activity[46]
RatSprague-Dawley ratsPulmonary hypertensionSimvastatin2 mg/kg/day4 weeksSimvastatin therapy was useful in early phase of the pulmonary hypertension and in severe inflammation[47]
RatSprague-Dawley ratsMyocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury.Atorvastatin10 mg/kg, i.v Atorvastatin has protective effects in myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury by activating Nrf2/ARE pathway[48]
Micemale C57BL/6 miceNon-alcoholic steatohepatitisSimvastatinmg/kg4 weeksSimvastatin reduces liver damage caused by oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress effect in mice with experimental non-alcoholic steatohepatitis[49]
MiceC57BL/6J backgroundCancersSimvastatin50 mg/kg7 daysDue to their antioxidant effects statins might be effective in cancer treatment by influencing several specific metabolic pathways and increased oxidative stress which causes cancer effective in cure of cancer[50]
MiceC57BL/6J female miceInflammatory diseasesAtorvastatin5 mg/kg10 daysStatins have anti-inflammatory effect in inflammatory diseases due to their effect on HO-1 which is an anti-inflammatory substance[44]
Mice Pulmonary inflammation diseaseMevastatin0.1 mg/kg24 hMevastatin induces HO-1via c-Src/PDGFR_/PI3K/Akt-regulated Nrf2/ARE pathway—TNF-α is suppressed which finally improves inflammatory pulmonary disease[45]
Micemale C57BL/6J miceCardiovascular diseaseSimvastatin0.75 to 5 mg/kg3, 6, 12, or 24 hSimvastatin have anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects in diseases by their influence on HO-1[42]
Ratadult male Sprague-Dawley ratsHeart diseaseSimvastatin2 mg/kg1, 2 wk, 1, 2, and 3 moSimvastatin could not reduce inflammation and could not up-regulate HO-1[51]
Table
Table 2. Summary of in vitro studies investigating statin effect in various diseases.
Table 2. Summary of in vitro studies investigating statin effect in various diseases.
Cell CultureDiseasesStatin TypeMain EffectRef
Human RPE cells (ARPE-19; ATCC No.CRL-2302)Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD)SimvastatinSimvastatin may have some clinical benefits in preventing ARMDs due to oxidative stress[52]
Human HAoEC cells peripheral blood CD34+ cellsDiabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseasesAtorvastatinHigh concentrations of atorvastatin could improve the paracrine angiogenic activity[40]
Murine RAW264.7 macrophages RAW264.7Inflammatory diseasesLovastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, mevastatin, and pravastatinStatins induce HO-1 gene expression and therefore have anti-inflammatory effects[53]
Human pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells (HPAEpiC)Inflammatory diseasesMevastatinMevastatin induced HO-1 expression so it has an important role in inflammatory diseases via up-regulation of AP-1/HO-1 system[54]
Primary human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs)Cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney diseaseRosuvastatinRosuvastatin has antioxidant effects by activating Nrf2 via p21Cip1 up-regulation - statins might be effective in improving antioxidative capacity[55]
RAW 264.7 and J774A.1 cellsInflammatory diseasesSimvastatin and fluvastatinStatins have anti-inflammatory effects and induce HO-1 in macrophage cell lines[41]
Rat aortic VSMCs (RASMCs) were isolated from thoracic aortas of Sprague-Dawley rats; human aortic VSMCs (HASMCs)Coronary heart diseaseSimvastatinSimvastatin activates HO-1 which has cytoprotective effects - statins have anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects[42]
Mouse RAW264.7 macrophagesHypercholesterolemiaSimvastatinSimvastatin has anti-inflammatory effects due to induction of HO-1[56]
HPAEpiCs Inflammatory lung diseases MevastatinMevastatin reduces TNF-α induced ICAM-1 expression via p47phox/Nox/ROS/c-Src/PDGFR_/PI3K/Akt/Nrf2/ARE/HO-1—statins have anti-inflammatory effects in HPAEpiCs[45]
Neuro-2A mouse neuroblastoma cellsInflammatory diseasesStatinsStatins induce HO-1 by binding with p38 [51]
HT-29 cells HCT-116ColoncancerSimvastatinSimvastatin improves colon cancer by activation of Nrf2 and expression of several antioxidant enzymes in pathways including ERK and PI3K/Akt[47]
Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs)Diabetic vasculopathyFluvastatinStatins improve diabetes complications by activating Nrf2 pathway reducing VSMC proliferation and migration and inducing AGEs and the ERK5-Nrf2 signal[57]
Human coronary artery smooth muscle cells (hCASMCs)Cardiovascular diseaseFluvastatinStatins have a protective role in oxidative injury inducing antioxidant enzymes in Nrf2/ARE pathway[58]
Human aortic smooth muscle cells (HASMCs)AtherosclerosisAtorvastatinSimultaneous use of atorvastatin and C3G could activate Nrf2 pathway and increase antioxidative effects including GCLC, NQO-1, and HO-1 and SOD activity removing superoxide radicals and finally improving atherosclerosis[59]
HL-1 cellsAtrial fibrillation (AF)RosuvastatinStatins improve AF by activation of Akt/Nrf2/HO-1 signaling and inducing antioxidant HO-1[60]
Human prostate adenocarcinoma (PC-3) and breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 cell linesAdenocarcinoma of the prostate and breast adenocarcinomaAtorvastatinSignificant up-regulation of HO-1 (all six ARE-like elements are present in the HO-1 promotor activated by atorvastatin) and apoptosis was induced in both PC-3(at a concentration of 1 µM) and MCF-7(at a concentration of 50 µM) cell lines[61]
Human umbilical endothelial cells HUVECCardiovascular diseaseAtorvastatinAtorvastatin moderately increased eNOS and HO-1 mRNA expression but HO-1 protein levels did not change significantly [62]
Human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC-1)Cardiovascular diseasesAtorvastatinAtorvastatin at concentration 0.1 μM enhanced the expression of eNOS and was ineffective in modulation of HO-1 protein level[63]
(NRK52E) cellsLipotoxic injury in kidneySimvastatinSimvastatin transcriptionally activates HO-1 that protect renal cells from lipotoxic injury[64]
SH-SY5Y cellsParkinson’s diseaseSimvastatinSimvastatin has antioxidant activity via ERK1/2-mediated modulation of the antioxidant system[65]
The rat renal proximal tubule cell line (NRK52E)Kidney diseaseSimvastatinAntioxidant effect of simvastatin via HO-1 may protect the kidney[64]
SH-SY5Y cellsParkinson’s diseaseSimvastatinSimvastatin has antioxidant effect via ERK1/2-mediated reduction – this may decrease the incidence of Parkinson’s disease [65]
Human endothelial cells cell line (ECV304)Cardiovascular diseaseStatinsStatins have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects via HMG-CoA reductase by activating HO-1 promoter[66]
Murine RAW264.7Inflammatory diseaseStatinsStatins activate protein kinase A and after affecting ERK and p38 MAPK pathways finally activate HO-1 gene expression and acting on this pathway are beneficial in anti-inflammatory diseases [53]
Rat aortic VSMCs (RASMCs)Cardiovascular diseaseSimvastatinSimvastatin has anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects by affecting HO-1[42]
HCT116 and HT-29 cellsColon cancerSimvastatinSimvastatin had beneficial effects in colon cancer cells by influencing Nrf2 and ERK and PI3K/Akt pathways[51]
A mouse neuroblastoma cell lineDegenerative neurological diseasesSimvastatinSimvastatin induced HO-1 expression in Neuro 2A cells by having effect on Nrf2 protein[67]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mansouri, A.; Reiner, Ž.; Ruscica, M.; Tedeschi-Reiner, E.; Radbakhsh, S.; Bagheri Ekta, M.; Sahebkar, A. Antioxidant Effects of Statins by Modulating Nrf2 and Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling in Different Diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051313

AMA Style

Mansouri A, Reiner Ž, Ruscica M, Tedeschi-Reiner E, Radbakhsh S, Bagheri Ekta M, Sahebkar A. Antioxidant Effects of Statins by Modulating Nrf2 and Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling in Different Diseases. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(5):1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051313

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mansouri, Atena, Željko Reiner, Massimiliano Ruscica, Eugenia Tedeschi-Reiner, Shabnam Radbakhsh, Mariam Bagheri Ekta, and Amirhossein Sahebkar. 2022. "Antioxidant Effects of Statins by Modulating Nrf2 and Nrf2/HO-1 Signaling in Different Diseases" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 5: 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11051313

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop