Next Article in Journal
Relationships between Plasma Pyrophosphate, Vascular Calcification and Clinical Severity in Patients Affected by Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum
Previous Article in Journal
Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation and Treatment of Non-Hepatic Hyperammonemia in ICU COVID-19 Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/jcm11092587
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Early Mobilization in the ICU and Psychiatric Symptoms after Surviving a Critical Illness: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study

by
Shinichi Watanabe
1,2,
Keibun Liu
3,*,
Kensuke Nakamura
4,
Ryo Kozu
5,
Tatsuya Horibe
6,
Kenzo Ishii
7,
Daisetsu Yasumura
8,9,
You Takahashi
10,
Tomoya Nanba
11,
Yasunari Morita
12,
Takahiro Kanaya
1,
Shuichi Suzuki
12,
Alan Kawarai Lefor
13,
Hajime Katsukawa
14 and
Toru Kotani
15
1
Department of Rehabilitation, National Hospital Organization, Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1 Sannomaru, Naka-ku, Nagoya 460-0001, Japan
2
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Gifu University of Health Science, 2-92 Higashiuzura, Gifu 500-8281, Japan
3
Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, 627 Rode Rd, Chermside, QLD 4032, Australia
4
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Hitachi General Hospital, 2-1-1 Jounann, Hitachi 317-0077, Japan
5
Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Science, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, 1-14 Bunkyou-cho, Nagasaki 852-8521, Japan
6
Department of Rehabilitation, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, 8-1 Kawata-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan
7
Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit, Fukuyama City Hospital, 3-8-5 Zao-cho, Fukuyama 721-8511, Japan
8
Department of Rehabilitation, Naha City Hospital, 2-31-1 Furujima, Naha 902-8511, Japan
9
Department of Healthcare Administration, The University of Kyushu, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
10
Department of Rehabilitation, Yuuai Medical Center, 50-5 Yone, Tomigusuku 901-0224, Japan
11
Department of Rehabilitation, Yao Tokushukai General Hospital, 1-17 Wakakusachou, Yao-shi, Osaka 581-0011, Japan
12
Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1 Sannomaru, Naka-ku, Nagoya 460-0001, Japan
13
Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimostuke-shi 329-0498, Japan
14
Japanese Society for Early Mobilization, 1-2-12 Kudankita, Tiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0073, Japan
15
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(9), 2587; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092587
Submission received: 11 March 2022 / Revised: 18 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 5 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Emergency Medicine)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This is a prospective multicenter cohort study aiming to investigate the association between early mobilization (EM), defined as a rehabilitation level of sitting at the edge of the bed or higher within 72 h of ICU admission, and psychiatric outcome. Consecutive patients, admitted to the ICU for more than 48 h, were enrolled. The primary outcome was the incidence of psychiatric symptoms at 3 months after hospital discharge defined as the presence of any of three symptoms: depression, anxiety, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Risk ratio (RR) and multiple logistic regression analysis were used. As a sensitivity analysis, two methods for inverse probability of treatment weighting statistics were performed. Of the 192 discharged patients, 99 (52%) were assessed. The patients who achieved EM had a lower incidence of psychiatric symptoms compared to those who did not (25% vs. 51%, p-value 0.008, odds ratio (OR) 0.27, adjusted p = 0.032). The RR for psychiatric symptoms in the EM group was 0.49 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.29–0.83]. Sensitivity analysis accounting for the influence of death, loss to follow-up (OR 0.28, adjusted p = 0.008), or potential confounders (OR 0.49, adjusted p = 0.046) consistently showed a lower incidence of psychiatric symptoms in the EM group. EM was consistently associated with fewer psychiatric symptoms.

1. Introduction

Critical illness may result in severe psychiatric disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [1,2], which adversely affect the quality of life and prevent intensive care unit (ICU) survivors from returning to their original lives [3]. Psychiatric symptoms occur in 10–70% of ICU survivors [1,2,4,5] and could last for several months or years after hospital discharge [6,7]. Although research interest is growing as shown by the increasing body of literature, there is no strategy with definitive effects to prevent the development of these symptoms.
Immobility induced by physical restriction is associated with the development of psychiatric disorders [8,9], while the potential benefits of regular physical exercise in non-ICU settings to decrease psychiatric symptoms have been described [10,11]. Active physical rehabilitation during the ICU stay, especially when initiated within the first 72 h of ICU stay, is recommended to prevent physical disabilities and improve clinical outcomes of ICU patients [12]. However, the effects of physical rehabilitation early in the ICU stay on psychiatric symptoms are unknown in the existing literature [13].
Therefore, we conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study to investigate the incidence rate of psychiatric symptoms at 3 months after hospital discharge and the association between active physical rehabilitation within 72 h of ICU admission and psychiatric symptoms. We focused on 3 months since a similar trend and incidence rate of psychiatric symptoms at 3 months and 1 year after hospital discharge have been observed [14,15].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Patient Selection

This multicenter prospective cohort study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nagoya Medical Center (2018093) and eight other participating hospitals (Hitachi General Hospital, Nagasaki University Hospital, Fukuyama City Hospital, Naha City Hospital, Yuuai Medical Center, Tokushukai General Hospital, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo Women’s Medical University Hospital) and registered in UMIN (ID: 000036503). We followed the STROBE guidelines [16], and all methods in this study were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Consecutive patients, up to 25 patients in each participating hospital, who stayed in the ICU for more than 48 h between June and December in 2019, were eligible for enrollment. Patients less than 18 years of age, unable to walk independently before admission, with neurological complications, lacking communication skills due to pre-existing mental diseases, or in a terminal state were excluded (Table S1). Our study excludes patients with a history of psychiatric disorders (depression, anxiety, PTSD). Patients who died or did not complete the assessment at 3 months follow-up after hospital discharge, were also excluded. In the present study, mobilization was defined as physical rehabilitation at the level of sitting on the edge of the bed or higher [17], and patients were divided into two groups. The patients were allocated into the early mobilization (EM) group when they achieved rehabilitation at the level of mobilization within 72 h of ICU admission [17,18,19]. Patients were allocated into the non-EM group when they did not receive mobilization during the ICU stay or achieved mobilization more than 72 h after ICU admission. All patients equally aimed to receive mobilization daily under a protocol tailored to the circumstances of participating hospitals, though mobilization could not be achieved when the patient did not meet the criteria (Table S2). Patients were not randomized in this study, and whether patients could undergo mobilization depended on the EM protocol used in each participating hospital.

2.2. EM Protocol

The early goal-directed protocol for rehabilitation [19,20,21] was developed more than 6 months before this study was initiated, and the details of the contents were arranged based on the situation of participating hospital. This protocol is used in multiple centers in routine practice and safety validation has already been reported [22]. The EM protocol details are shown in Table S2.
The protocol provides patients with five rehabilitation levels (level 1, passive range of motion and respiration physical therapy; level 2, active range of motion; level 3, sitting exercise; level 4, standing exercise; and level 5, walking exercise) based on their medical condition. At each participating site, ICU physicians or physiotherapists made the final decision of the rehabilitation level based on the patient’s condition while referring to the protocol. All patients were supposed to receive at least one rehabilitation session per day for 20 min on weekdays.
Regarding other ICU care, all participating hospitals followed the 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines [23] and the clinical practice guideline for the management of ARDS [24].
After transfer out of the ICU, all patients underwent rehabilitation, such as muscle strengthening, balancing, walking, and stair exercises, for more than 20 min on weekdays by physical or occupational therapists according to the rehabilitation policy in the general ward of each hospital without any specific protocol.

2.3. Follow-Up Protocol

Table S3 shows the details of the follow-up protocol. At 3 months after hospital discharge, a doctor, a nurse, or physiotherapist at each participating hospital made a phone call to the patient to confirm their survival. Once survival was confirmed, evaluation of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) [25] was verbally performed during the same phone call. Then, questionnaires and response sheets for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) were mailed to the patient’ home. The questionnaires were sent back to each participating hospital with the patient’s responses. Despite several phone calls, if the patient did not respond, they were excluded from analysis as lost to follow-up.

2.4. Data Collection

Baseline characteristics were collected at the time of ICU admission and during the ICU stay by co-investigators at each hospital, including age, gender, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index [26], Barthel Index before hospitalization [27], ICU admission diagnosis, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and use of mechanical ventilation, continuous vasopressors, continuous analgesia, continuous sedation, steroids, neuromuscular blocking agents, dialysis, time to first out of bed mobilization from the time of ICU admission, highest ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) during ICU stay, and the number of daily rehabilitation sessions on the ward. Barthel index before hospitalization was scored at the time of ICU admission based on the information from the family or the patients if they were conscious. The average sedation level, described according to the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), from days 1 to 3 was calculated based on data in the electronic medical record. The IMS provides a sensitive 11-point ordinal scale, ranging from nothing (lying/passive exercises in bed, score of 0) to independent ambulation (score of 10) [28].

2.5. Study Outcomes

The primary outcome was the incidence of psychiatric symptoms at 3 months after hospital discharge, which was defined as the presence of at least one of three symptoms: depression, anxiety, or PTSD. Depression and anxiety were assessed using the HADS that contains 14 items, seven for anxiety assessment and seven for depression, with a score of 0–3 for each item. Within a maximum score of 21 for each subset for depression or anxiety assessment, the presence of depression or anxiety was defined as a score of 8 or more [29]. PTSD was evaluated using the IES-R, a 22-item self-reported measure with scores ranging between 0 and 88 points (score 0–4 per item). The presence of PTSD was defined as a score of 25 or more [30].
Secondary outcomes were the scores on HADS subsets for depression or anxiety and the IES-R score for PTSD at 3 months after hospital discharge, as well as the change in each score between hospital discharge and at 3 months.
Other variables included the EQ-5D-5L which is a standardized assessment for HRQoL [25] at 3 months follow-up and at hospital discharge, walking independence at discharge [21], duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU and hospital stays, Barthel Index at hospital discharge, incidence of delirium during ICU stay, incidence of ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) at ICU discharge. Patients who could walk 45 m or more with or without braces were regarded as walking independent [19]. For the assessment of delirium, either Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit [31] or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist [32] was used as delirium screening tool. ICU Acquired Weakness is defined that Medical Research Council-sum score evaluating by physical therapists is less than 48 at the time of ICU discharge [33].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

A sample size of 240 patients is needed with 80% power and a two-sided significance level of 0.05, under the assumption of a follow-up achievement rate of 80%, 60% of non-EM patients will develop psychiatric symptoms and EM patients will have a 20% reduction based on previous studies [14,15,34].
Data are presented as a median with interquartile range or as a number with percentage. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous variables and the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for nominal variables, as appropriate. Before using a non-parametric test, the distribution of each parameter was evaluated with the Shapiro–Wilk test.
In addition to the comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups, given the influence of death and loss to follow-up, we also compared them between patients discharged from the ICU and those who completed follow-up at 3 months. The same analysis was conducted among patients discharged from ICUs and those who completed follow-up both in the EM and non-EM groups.
Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify an association of the primary outcome with the following covariates: Age, male gender, Barthel index before hospitalization, ICU admission diagnosis, APACHE II score, and use of mechanical ventilation, continuous analgesia, continuous sedation, steroids, and neuromuscular blocking agents, and dialysis, which were considered as factors related to the primary outcome in previous reports (Table S4) [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. To analyze secondary and other outcomes, multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed for log-transformed continuous and categorical variables, respectively, using the same covariates as used in analyzing the primary outcome. Each relative risk ratio (RR) for the incidence of depression, anxiety, or PTSD in the EM group against the non-EM group was described. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between the number of days from ICU admission to first mobilization and the HADS subset scores for depression or anxiety or the IES-R score for PTSD.
As a post hoc analysis, two methods for inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) statistics were used. The first adjusted the influence of death and follow-up loss and the second adjusted as many confounding factors from baseline characteristics such as severity, baseline comorbidity, ICU admission diagnosis, consciousness level, which could affect the outcomes. The methodological details of the analysis are shown in Table S5 [48,49].
All analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Statistical tests were two-sided, and statistical significance was defined as p-values of <0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

Of the 1014 patients screened, 203 were enrolled (Figure 1). Of these, 192 patients were discharged from the ICU and were eligible for follow-up assessment. Excluding patients who died or who missed the 3-month follow-up, a total of 99 patients, including 60 in the EM group and 39 in the non-EM group, completed the 3-month follow-up. There were differences among the measured baseline characteristics between the two groups, for the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (17 vs. 21, p = 0.026) and the use of mechanical ventilation (53% vs. 74%, p = 0.034), steroids, neuromuscular blockade (0% vs. 13%, p = 0.008), and dialysis (12% vs. 28%, p = 0.037) (Table 1). The average RASS score within the first 3 days of the ICU stay was not significantly lower in the EM group. Among the rehabilitation items, the EM group had a shorter time from ICU admission to first rehabilitation (1.7 days vs. 5.3 days, p < 0.001), and a higher IMS score during their ICU stay (8 vs. 4, p < 0.001).
Considering the bias due to death and loss to follow-up, no differences were observed in all baseline characteristics comparing patients discharged from the ICU and who completed the 3-month follow-up in each comparison (Table S6).

3.2. Primary and Secondary Outcomes

The incidence of psychiatric symptoms at the 3-month follow-up point was significantly lower in the EM group than in the non-EM group [odds ratio (OR): 0.27, adjusted p = 0.032] even after adjustment for the baseline characteristics of the two groups, whereas the incidence at the time of hospital discharge was not different (OR: 1.03, adjusted p = 0.965) (Table 2).
At 3 months follow-up, the EM group showed a significantly lower incidence of PTSD (OR: 0.06, adjusted p = 0.026) and had a significantly lower HADS subset score for anxiety (adjusted p = 0.004) and IES-R (adjusted p = 0.009) compared with the non-EM group. The EM group demonstrated no significant differences in the incidence of depression, anxiety, and PTSD, the HADS subset scores for depression and anxiety, and the IES-R score at the time of hospital discharge. When comparing the assessment scores at hospital discharge and at 3 months follow-up, only changes in the HADS subset scores for anxiety in the EM group were significantly higher (adjusted p = 0.032).
The risk for developing psychiatric symptoms [RR: 0.49, confidence interval (CI): 0.29–0.83, p = 0.010], depression (RR: 0.52, CI: 0.27–0.99, p = 0.006), anxiety (RR: 0.27, CI: 0.10–0.71, p < 0.001), and PTSD (RR: 0.07, CI: 0.01–0.54, p < 0.001) at 3 months follow-up were lower in the EM group, while no significant difference in the risk ratios was observed at the time of hospital discharge (Table 3).
The time from ICU admission to first mobilization correlated weak linearly with the HADS subset scores for depression (r = 0.244, p = 0.011) and anxiety (r = 0.350, p < 0.001), and the IES-R score (r = 0.289, p = 0.003) at 3 months follow-up (Figure S1). Multiple linear regression analysis also demonstrated that EM was significantly associated with the HADS subset score for anxiety [β coefficient: 0.311, adjusted p = 0.004] and the IES-R score (β coefficient: 0.278, adjusted p = 0.009) at 3 months follow-up. Changes in the HADS subset scores for anxiety were significantly associated with achieving EM (β coefficient: −0.242, adjusted p = 0.032) (Table S7).

3.3. Other Variables

There was no difference between the two groups in the EQ-5D-5L at 3 months follow-up and at hospital discharge. The EM group had a shorter length of ICU and hospital stays, a higher Barthel Index at hospital discharge, and a lower incidence of delirium and ICU-AW. (Table 4).

3.4. Post Hoc Sensitivity Analysis

The model created by IPTW considering the influence of death and follow-up loss showed that EM correlated significantly with a lower incidence of psychiatric symptoms (OR: 0.28, CI: 0.11–0.73, adjusted p = 0.008), lower incidence of anxiety and PTSD, and a lower HADS subset score for anxiety and IES-R score at 3 months follow-up (Table S8). In the IPTW analysis using the propensity score with adjustment of 19 baseline variables, EM correlated significantly with a lower incidence of psychiatric symptoms at 3 months (OR: 0.49, CI: 0.14–0.93, adjusted p = 0.046) and a lower incidence of PTSD and a lower HADS subset score for anxiety and IES-R score (Table S9).

4. Discussion

The incidence of psychiatric symptoms was significantly lower in the EM group and EM in the ICU was significantly associated with a lower incidence of psychiatric symptoms at 3 months follow-up after hospital discharge even after adjustment for significant differences in the baseline characteristics including severity and treatments received. The results were consistent even if the influence of patient death, loss to follow-up or potential confounding factors were included in the analysis. Furthermore, the interval from ICU admission to first mobilization correlated significantly with the score of HADS subsets for Depression and Anxiety and the score of IES-R for PTSD.
Mobilization, rehabilitation at the level of sitting on the edge of the bed or higher was significantly associated with improved psychiatric symptoms. A previous systematic review using mobilization in the ICU as an intervention did not show a significant improvement in psychiatric symptoms after ICU discharge [50]. Of note, most studies in that systematic review did not define the time point for mobilization, despite the potential benefit of mobilization within 72 h of ICU admission (Early Mobilization) which is described in current literature [13,51]. For instance, providing EM improves independent physical function at the time of discharge, shortens delirium duration, and increases ventilator-free days [52], whereas mobilization initiated more than 72 h after ICU admission has no beneficial effect [13,53].
The present study supports the idea that the effect of EM on outcomes related to psychiatric symptoms after ICU discharge as well as other clinical outcomes might be maximized if mobilization is initiated within 72 h of ICU admission. The significant correlation between time from ICU admission to achieve EM and scores for diagnosing psychiatric symptoms support this idea. The interval until initiation of mobilization might be an essential aspect of physical rehabilitation in the ICU to maximize the effect on patient outcomes.
The EM group had a lower incidence of psychiatric symptoms at 3 months follow-up, but there was no significant difference between the groups at discharge. It has been reported that there is a time lag for the onset of anxiety and depression [54,55]. Therefore, the time of onset of each psychiatric symptom, such as depression, anxiety, and PTSD, could be different [56]. The time for the effect of EM on outcomes after hospital discharge to appear could vary among the psychiatric symptoms. Comparing the difference at 3 months and at hospital discharge, anxiety was the most improved among the psychiatric symptoms assessed. As previous studies have shown, an exercise period of at least 8 weeks is required to reduce depression, whereas anxiety disorders are improved with exercise in a relatively short period [13,57]. Considering these, the follow-up period might be adjusted depending on outcomes and interventions of the study related to psychiatric symptoms after ICU admission.
Several studies suggest an interaction between physical and psychiatric factors and these outcomes could be linked [58,59]. Physical impairment could result in poor psychiatric function and vice versa. For example, ICU-AW could lead to the development of delirium which is a potential risk factor for the development of psychiatric disorders [60]. There is evidence to support the idea that EM could reduce not only physical impairment, such as ICU-AW, but also delirium similar to the results of the present study [61] and might result in a synergistic and beneficial effect on psychiatric function. It has been suggested that exercise or mobilization improves mental health [62] and self-efficacy [63], increase endorphin and monoamine levels [63], decrease cortisol levels [64], and increase brain-derived neurotrophic factor [65], resulting in better psychiatric outcomes as a potential mechanism for mobilization improving psychiatric symptoms. In addition, there were several differences in outcomes at the time of hospital discharge, such as physical function, that could be not only intervening factors but also mediators of psychiatric symptoms after a critical illness. Further studies are warranted to validate the relationship between physical and psychiatric function, and the background mechanisms to capture the interaction between interventions such as mobilization, physical impairment at hospital discharge, and psychiatric symptoms at follow-up.
The comparability between the two groups is a primary limitation of this study. The calculated sample size could not be achieved, there was a relatively large influence of death and loss to follow-up and the study was not randomized. These factors may limit generalizability to other ICUs. Second, there are confounding factors which could not be adjusted for, such as educational history and clinical frailty. However, multivariate analysis with important clinical factors, IPTW, and propensity score matching adjusted by potential confounders showed consistent results even though there are several differences in important baseline characteristics of the two groups, for example the use of mechanical ventilation, steroids, neuromuscular blocking agents and dialysis. Third, outcomes were limited to short-term follow-up. Fourth, whether the patient could receive rehabilitation at the level of sitting on the edge of the bed or higher depended on the rehabilitation policy used in each participating hospital. Therefore, whether EM could not be provided due to poor general condition or other factors was not identified. Fifth, the psychiatric symptoms of the primary outcome of this study are diagnosed by scoring and are not based on criteria by psychiatrists or psychiatric liaison teams. Finally, patients who died in the ICU were excluded from the analysis in this study because we targeted ICU survivors. This could result in selection bias and these findings should be interpreted with caution. To further validate these results and investigate causality, a multicenter randomized controlled trial with more patients is needed.

5. Conclusions

EM in the ICU is significantly associated with lower rates of psychiatric symptoms, including depression, anxiety, and PTSD, at 3 months follow-up after hospital discharge. The interval from ICU admission to mobilization might be an important parameter to maximize the beneficial effects on patient outcomes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm11092587/s1, Table S1. Exclusion criteria; Table S2. Early Mobilization Protocol; Table S3. Details of follow-up; Table S4. The rationale for collected data; Table S5. Details of the post hoc sensitivity analysis; Table S6. Comparison of baseline characteristics of patients considering bias related to loss to follow-up and death; Figure S1. Correlation between the time from ICU admission to first mobilization and each assessment score for psychiatric disorders at 3 months follow-up. HADS = Hospital anxiety and depression scale, IES-R = Impact of event scale-revised. Mobilization is defined as physical rehabilitation at the level of sitting on the edge of the bed or higher; Table S7. Association between early mobilization and psychiatric disorder assessment score; Table S8. Sensitivity analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighted statistics considering bias from death and loss to follow-up; Table S9. Sensitivity analysis using a propensity score with 19 confounding factors.

Author Contributions

S.W. and K.L. conducted the study design. S.W., A.K.L., K.N., R.K., T.H., K.I., D.Y., Y.T., T.N., Y.M., T.K. (Takahiro Kanaya), S.S., H.K. and T.K (Toru Kotani). participated in creating the protocol and introducing the protocol in our ICU. SW and KL helped in the data collection and the statistical analysis. S.W., K.L., K.N., A.K.L. and T.K. (Toru Kotani). helped in the development of this manuscript, and A.K.L. also checked the English grammar. A.K.L. advised on the statistical methods. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Supported, in part, by grants from the Public Trust Foundation of Marumo ER Medicine & Research Institute of Japan. Morita received support for article research from the Public Trust Foundation of Marumo ER Medicine & Research Institute of Japan. A.K.L. reports personal fees from MERA and receives a salary from TXP Medical completely outside of the submitted work. K.N. reports personal fees from Abbott Laboratory, Nestle, TERUMO, GETINGE, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Japan Blood Products Organization, Nihon Pharmaceutical, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Toray, and Baxter, and grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This research was approved by the ethics committee of each participating hospital and the ethics committee of the Nagoya Medical Center Hospital (institutional review board approval number 2018093, date of approval 10 April 2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset generated and analyzed during the current study is not publicly available but is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the study coordinators Tetsuo Ikai, Gen Kudo, Masako Shimada, Syouhei Yokota, Naoko Shima, Maiko Mori, Yayoi Honjo, Ohno Mika, Takahiro Kanaya, Yasuko Muranaka, Hiromasa Harada, Masahiro Tamashiro, Shohei Miyazato, Shogo Sakihama, Ryo Nagato, Shuhei Ikeguchi, Yoshiyuki Teranobu, Tsubasa Watanabe, Yuuiichi Miyagi, Hiroyuki Touyama, Moromizato, Ayako Kawasaki, Noriyo Suzuki, Sayaka Hosoi, Takahiro Fujita, Syohei Hachisu, Hidehiko Nakano, and Hiromu Naraba. The authors would also like to thank the entire ICU staff at all the participating hospitals. The authors thank Akiko Kada, a biostatistician at Nagoya Medical Center, for providing assistance in reviewing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

Some authors report potential conflicts of interest outside of the current study: YM received support for article research from the Public Trust Foundation of Marumo ER Medicine & Research Institute of Japan. H.K. receives a salary from the Japanese Society for Early Mobilization (nonprofit society) as a chair (full time). A.K.L. received personal fees from MERA and receives a salary from TXP Medical. T.K. (Toru Kotani). is on the medical advisory board for Toray Medical, Healios, and C-Ventec; and received lecture fees from Paramount bed, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Pfizer. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kawakami, D.; Fujitani, S.; Morimoto, T.; Dote, H.; Takita, M.; Takaba, A.; Hino, M.; Nakamura, M.; Irie, H.; Adachi, T.; et al. Prevalence of post-intensive care syndrome among Japanese intensive care unit patients: A prospective, multicenter, observational J-PICS study. Crit. Care 2021, 25, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jackson, J.C.; Pandharipande, P.P.; Girard, T.D.; Brummel, N.E.; Thompson, J.L.; Hughes, C.G.; Pun, B.T.; Vasilevskis, E.E.; Morandi, A.; Shintani, A.K.; et al. Depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and functional disability in survivors of critical illness in the BRAIN-ICU study: A longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2014, 2, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Needham, D.M.; Davidson, J.; Cohen, H.; Hopkins, R.O.; Weinert, C.; Wunsch, H.; Zawistowski, C.; Bemis-Dougherty, A.; Berney, S.C.; Bienvenu, O.J.; et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: Report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 40, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Harvey, M.A. The truth about consequences--post-intensive care syndrome in intensive care unit survivors and their families. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 40, 2506–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Myers, E.A.; Smith, D.A.; Allen, S.R.; Kaplan, L.J. Post-ICU syndrome: Rescuing the undiagnosed. JAAPA 2016, 29, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Parker, A.M.; Sricharoenchai, T.; Raparla, S.; Schneck, K.W.; Bienvenu, O.J.; Needham, D.M. Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Critical Illness Survivors: A Metaanalysis. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 43, 1121–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Huang, M.; Parker, A.M.; Bienvenu, O.J.; Dinglas, V.D.; Colantuoni, E.; Hopkins, R.O.; Needham, D.M.; National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Psychiatric Symptoms in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Survivors: A One-Year National Multi-Center Study. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 44, 954–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Styf, J.R.; Hutchinson, K.; Carlsson, S.G.; Hargens, A.R. Depression, mood state, and back pain during microgravity simulated by bed rest. Psychosom. Med. 2001, 63, 862–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ishizaki, Y.; Ishizaki, T.; Fukuoka, H.; Kim, C.S.; Fujita, M.; Maegawa, Y.; Fujioka, H.; Katsura, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Gunji, A. Changes in mood status and neurotic levels during a 20-day bed rest. Acta Astronaut. 2002, 50, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bridle, C.; Spanjers, K.; Patel, S.; Atherton, N.M.; Lamb, S.E. Effect of exercise on depression severity in older people: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br. J. Psychiatry 2012, 201, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Cooney, G.M.; Kerry, D.; Carolyn, A.G.; Debbie, A.L.; Jane, R.; Fiona, R.W.; Marion, M.; Gillian, E.M. Exercise for depression. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013, 12, CD004366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nishida, O.; Ogura, H.; Egi, M.; Fujishima, S.; Hayashi, Y.; Iba, T.; Imaizumi, H.; Inoue, S.; Kakihana, Y.; Kotani, J.; et al. The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016. Acute Med. Surg. 2018, 5, 3–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fuest, K.; Schaller, S.J. Recent evidence on early mobilization in critical-ill patients. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2018, 31, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hatch, R.; Young, D.; Barber, V.; Griffiths, J.; Harrison, D.A.; Watkinson, P. Anxiety, Depression and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after critical illness: A UK-wide prospective cohort study. Crit. Care 2018, 22, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Marra, A.; Pandharipande, P.P.; Girard, T.D.; Patel, M.B.; Hughes, C.G.; Jackson, J.C.; Thompson, J.L.; Chandrasekhar, R.; Ely, E.W.; Brummel, N.E. Co-Occurrence of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome Problems Among 406 Survivors of Critical Illness. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 46, 1393–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vandenbroucke, J.P.; von Elm, E.; Altman, D.G.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Pocock, S.J.; Poole, C.; Schlesselman, J.J.; Egger, M.; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 2007, 18, 805–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Harrold, M.E.; Salisbury, L.G.; Webb, S.A. Australia and Scotland ICU Physiotherapy Collaboration. Early mobilisation in intensive care units in Australia and Scotland: A prospective, observational cohort study examining mobilisation practises and barriers. Crit. Care 2015, 19, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kuhn, K.F.; Schaller, S.J. Comment on Early versus delayed mobilization for in-hospital mortality and health-related quality of life among critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Intensive Care 2020, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Watanabe, S.; Liu, K.; Morita, Y.; Kanaya, T.; Naito, Y.; Arakawa, R.; Suzuki, S.; Katsukawa, H.; Lefor, A.K.; Hasegawa, Y.; et al. Changes in barriers to implementing early mobilization in the intensive care unit: A single center retrospective cohort study. Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 2021, 83, 443–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, K.; Ogura, T.; Takahashi, K.; Nakamura, M.; Ohtake, H.; Fujiduka, K.; Abe, E.; Oosaki, H.; Miyazaki, D.; Suzuki, H.; et al. A Progressive Early Mobilization Program Is Significantly Associated With Clinical and Economic Improvement: A Single-Center Quality Comparison Study. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 47, e744–e752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Watanabe, S.; Kotani, T.; Taito, S.; Ota, K.; Ishii, K.; Ono, M.; Katsukawa, H.; Kozu, R.; Morita, Y.; Arakawa, R.; et al. Determinants of gait independence after mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: A Japanese multicenter retrospective exploratory cohort study. J. Intensive Care 2019, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Katsukawa, H.; Ota, K.; Liu, K.; Morita, Y.; Watanabe, S.; Sato, K.; Ishii, K.; Yasumura, D.; Takahashi, Y.; Tani, T.; et al. Risk Factors of Patient-Related Safety Events during Active Mobilization for Intubated Patients in Intensive Care Units-A Multi-Center Retrospective Observational Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Devlin, J.W.; Skrobik, Y.; Gélinas, C.; Needham, D.M.; Slooter, A.; Pandharipande, P.P.; Watson, P.L.; Weinhouse, G.L.; Nunnally, M.E.; Rochwerg, B.; et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 46, e825–e873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hashimoto, S.; Sanui, M.; Egi, M.; Ohshimo, S.; Shiotsuka, J.; Seo, R.; Tanaka, R.; Tanaka, Y.; Norisue, Y.; Hayashi, Y.; et al. ARDS clinical practice guideline committee from the Japanese Society of Respiratory Care Medicine and the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine. The clinical practice guideline for the management of ARDS in Japan. J. Intensive Care 2017, 5, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shiroiwa, T.; Ikeda, S.; Noto, S.; Igarashi, A.; Fukuda, T.; Saito, S.; Shimozuma, K. Shiroiwa T. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan. Value Health 2016, 19, 648–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Charlson, M.E.; Pompei, P.; Ales, K.L.; Mackenzie, C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic. Dis. 1987, 40, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Katz, P.P. Measures of Adult General Functional Status: The Barthel Index, Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire, and Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ). Arthritis Care Res. 2003, 49, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hodgson, C.; Needham, D.; Haines, K.; Bailey, M.; Ward, A.; Harrold, M.; Young, P.; Zanni, J.; Buhr, H.; Higgins, A.; et al. Feasibility and inter-rater reliability of the ICU Mobility Scale. Heart Lung. 2014, 43, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zigmond, A.S.; Snaith, R.P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1983, 67, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Asukai, N.; Kato, H.; Kawamura, N.; Kim, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Kishimoto, J.; Miyake, Y.; Nishizono-Maher, A. Reliability and validity of the Japanese-language version of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R-J): Four studies on different traumatic events. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 2002, 190, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ely, E.W.; Margolin, R.; Francis, J.; May, L.; Truman, B.; Dittus, R.; Speroff, T.; Gautam, S.; Bernard, G.R.; Inouye, S.K. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit. Care Med. 2001, 29, 1370–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bergeron, N.; Dubois, M.J.; Dumont, M.; Dial, S.; Skrobik, Y. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: Evaluation of a new screening tool. Intensive Care Med. 2001, 27, 859–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Patel, B.K.; Pohlman, A.S.; Hall, J.B.; Kress, J.P. Impact of early mobilization on glycemic control and ICU-acquired weakness in critically ill patients who are mechanically ventilated. Chest. 2014, 146, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Choo, C.C.; Chew, P.; Lai, S.M.; Soo, S.C.; Ho, C.S.; Ho, R.C.; Wong, R.C. Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Quality of Life, Depression and Anxiety in Asian Patients. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Mikkelsen, M.E.; Christie, J.D.; Lanken, P.N.; Biester, R.C.; Thompson, B.T.; Bellamy, S.L.; Localio, A.R.; Demissie, E.; Hopkins, R.O.; Angus, D.C. The adult respiratory distress syndrome cognitive outcomes study. Long-term neuropsychological function in survivors of acute lung injury. Am. J. Respir Crit Care Med. 2012, 185, 1307–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Shima, N.; Miyamoto, K.; Shibata, M.; Nakashima, T.; Kaneko, M.; Shibata, N.; Shima, Y.; Kato, S.; W-PICS investigators. Activities of daily living status and psychiatric symptoms after discharge from an intensive care unit: A single-center 12-month longitudinal prospective study. Acute Med. Surg. 2020, 7, e557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. LaBuzetta, J.N.; Rosand, J.; Vranceanu, A.M. Review: Post-Intensive Care Syndrome: Unique Challenges in the Neurointensive Care Unit. Neurocrit. Care 2019, 311, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Inoue, S.; Hatakeyama, J.; Kondo, Y.; Hifumi, T.; Sakuramoto, H.; Kawasaki, T.; Taito, S.; Nakamura, K.; Unoki, T.; Kawai, Y.; et al. Post-intensive care syndrome: Its pathophysiology, prevention, and future directions. Acute Med. Surg. 2019, 6, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Rabiee, A.; Nikayin, S.; Hashem, M.D.; Huang, M.; Dinglas, V.D.; Bienvenu, O.J.; Turnbull, A.E.; Needham, D.M. Depressive Symptoms After Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit. Care Med. 2016, 44, 1744–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Easton, K.; Coventry, P.; Lovell, K.; Carter, L.A.; Deaton, C. Prevalence and Measurement of Anxiety in Samples of Patients with Heart Failure: Meta-analysis. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2016, 31, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kondo, I.; Arai, Y.; Hamada, A.; Yamada, K.; Shioji, S.; Sakamoto, E.; Katagiri, D.; Tada, M.; Hinoshita, F. A Case of Frequently Relapsing Minimal-Change Nephrotic Syndrome with Steroid-Induced Psychiatric Syndrome Treated by Low-Dose, Short-Term Steroid Therapy in Combination with Cyclosporine. Case Rep. Nephrol. Dial. 2020, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hedayati, S.S.; Finkelstein, F.O. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of depression in patients with CKD. Am. J. Kidney Dis. Off. J. Natl. Kidney Found. 2009, 54, 741–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Narimatsu, E.; Nakayama, Y.; Sumita, S.; Iwasaki, H.; Fujimura, N.; Satoh, K.; Namiki, A. Sepsis attenuates the intensity of the neuromuscular blocking effect of d-tubocurarine and the antagonistic actions of neostigmine and edrophonium accompanying depression of muscle contractility of the diaphragm. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 1999, 43, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nikayin, S.; Rabiee, A.; Hashem, M.D.; Huang, M.; Bienvenu, O.J.; Turnbull, A.E.; Needham, D.M. Anxiety symptoms in survivors of critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2016, 43, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Caiuby, A.V.; Andreoli, P.B.; Andreoli, S.B. Post-traumatic stress disorder in intensive care unit patients. Transtorno de estresse pós-traumático em pacientes de unidade de terapia intensiva. Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva 2010, 22, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Davydow, D.S.; Gifford, J.M.; Desai, S.V.; Needham, D.M.; Bienvenu, O.J. Posttraumatic stress disorder in general intensive care unit survivors: A systematic review. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2008, 30, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Tang, F.; Tan, J.; Guo, X.; Huang, J.; Yi, J.; Wang, L. Risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder in acute trauma patients: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2021, 100, e25616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fukunaga, S.; Nagami, Y.; Shiba, M.; Ominami, M.; Tanigawa, T.; Yamagami, H.; Tanaka, H.; Muguruma, K.; Watanabe, T.; Tominaga, K.; et al. Long-term prognosis of expanded-indication differentiated-type early gastric cancer treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgery using propensity score analysis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017, 85, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nagami, Y.; Tominaga, K.; Machida, H.; Nakatani, M.; Kameda, N.; Sugimori, S.; Okazaki, H.; Tanigawa, T.; Yamagami, H.; Kubo, N.; et al. Usefulness of non-magnifying narrow-band imaging in screening of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective comparative study using propensity score matching. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 109, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Fuke, R.; Hifumi, T.; Kondo, Y.; Hatakeyama, J.; Takei, T.; Yamakawa, K.; Inoue, S.; Nishida, O. Early rehabilitation to prevent postintensive care syndrome in patients with critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e019998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bein, T.; Bischoff, M.; Brückner, U.; Gebhardt, K.; Henzler, D.; Hermes, C.; Lewandowski, K.; Max, M.; Nothacker, M.; Staudinger, T.; et al. S2e guideline: Positioning and early mobilisation in prophylaxis or therapy of pulmonary disorders: Revision 2015: S2e guideline of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI). Anaesthesist 2015, 64, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Schweickert, W.D.; Pohlman, M.C.; Pohlman, A.S.; Nigos, C.; Pawlik, A.J.; Esbrook, C.L.; Spears, L.; Miller, M.; Franczyk, M.; Deprizio, D.; et al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009, 373, 1874–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wright, S.E.; Thomas, K.; Watson, G.; Baker, C.; Bryant, A.; Chadwick, T.J.; Shen, J.; Wood, R.; Wilkinson, J.; Mansfield, L.; et al. Intensive versus standard physical rehabilitation therapy in the critically ill (EPICC): A multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2018, 73, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Bienvenu, O.J.; Colantuoni, E.; Mendez-Tellez, P.A.; Shanholtz, C.; Dennison-Himmelfarb, C.R.; Pronovost, P.J.; Needham, D.M. Cooccurrence of and remission from general anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms after acute lung injury: A 2-year longitudinal study. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 43, 642–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Brück, E.; Larsson, J.W.; Lasselin, J.; Bottai, M.; Hirvikoski, T.; Sundman, E.; Eberhardson, M.; Sackey, P.; Olofsson, P.S. Lack of clinically relevant correlation between subjective and objective cognitive function in ICU survivors: A prospective 12-month follow-up study. Crit. Care 2019, 23, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Taylor, A.H. Physical Activity, Stress and Anxiety: A Review. In Physical Activity and Psychological Well-Being; Biddle, S.J.H., Fox, K., Boutcher, S., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 2000; pp. 10–45. [Google Scholar]
  57. Penninx, B.W.; Rejeski, W.J.; Pandya, J.; Miller, M.E.; Di Bari, M.; Applegate, W.B.; Pahor, M. Exercise and depressive symptoms: A comparison of aerobic and resistance exercise effects on emotional and physical function in older persons with high and low depressive symptomatology. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2002, 57, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Zhao, J.L.; Jiang, W.T.; Wang, X.; Cai, Z.D.; Liu, Z.H.; Liu, G.R. Exercise, brain plasticity, and depression. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2020, 26, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cahn, B.R.; Goodman, M.S.; Peterson, C.T.; Maturi, R.; Mills, P.J. Yoga, Meditation and Mind-Body Health: Increased BDNF, Cortisol Awakening Response, and Altered Inflammatory Marker Expression after a 3-Month Yoga and Meditation Retreat. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017, 26, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Vasilevskis, E.E.; Ely, E.W.; Speroff, T.; Pun, B.T.; Boehm, L.; Dittus, R.S. Reducing iatrogenic risks: ICU-acquired delirium and weakness--crossing the quality chasm. Chest 2010, 138, 1224–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Girard, T.D.; Shintani, A.K.; Jackson, J.C.; Gordon, S.M.; Pun, B.T.; Henderson, M.S.; Dittus, R.S.; Bernard, G.R.; Ely, E.W. Risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms following critical illness requiring mechanical ventilation: A prospective cohort study. Crit. Care 2007, 11, R28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Geense, W.W.; van den Boogaard, M.; van der Hoeven, J.G.; Vermeulen, H.; Hannink, G.; Zegers, M. Nonpharmacologic Interventions to Prevent or Mitigate Adverse Long-Term Outcomes Among ICU Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 47, 1607–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Craft, L.L. Exercise and clinical depression: Examining two psychological mechanisms. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2005, 6, 151–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, M.J. The neurobiology of depression and physical exercise. In Handbook of Physical Activity and Mental Health; Routledge: London, UK, 2013; pp. 169–184. [Google Scholar]
  65. Cotman, C.W.; Berchtold, N.C. Exercise: A behavioural intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 2002, 25, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 11 02587 g001 550
Figure 1. Study flow chart. ICU = intensive care unit. a Neurological complications include cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, acute subdual hematoma, acute epidural hematoma, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, and encephalitis. b Diseases include depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, dementia, cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, and alcoholism. c Four out of nine hospitals could not enroll 25 patients and enrolled 14, 21, 22, and 21 patients.
Figure 1. Study flow chart. ICU = intensive care unit. a Neurological complications include cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, acute subdual hematoma, acute epidural hematoma, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, and encephalitis. b Diseases include depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, dementia, cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, and alcoholism. c Four out of nine hospitals could not enroll 25 patients and enrolled 14, 21, 22, and 21 patients.
Jcm 11 02587 g001
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics.
VariablesEarly
Mobilization Group
(n = 60)		Non-Early
Mobilization Group (n = 39)		p Value
Age (years), median (IQR)70 (61–75)73 (57–79)0.416
Gender (male), n (%)39 (65)23 (59)0.545
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR)23 (21–25)24 (21–27)0.439
Charlson Comorbidity Index, median (IQR)2 (1–2)1 (0–2)0.591
Barthel index before hospitalization, median (IQR) a100 (100–100)100 (100–100)0.638
ICU admission diagnosis, n (%) 0.652
     Acute respiratory failure (including pneumonia)6 (10)6 (15)
     Cardiovascular disease30 (50)18 (46)
     Gastric or colonic surgery10 (17)4 (10)
     Sepsis, non-pulmonary9 (15)5 (13)
     Other diagnoses5 (8)6 (15)
APACHE II score, median (IQR)17 (12–22)21 (16–26)0.026
SOFA at ICU admission, median (IQR)7 (3–8)7 (4–11)0.121
The use of mechanical ventilation during ICU stay, n (%)32 (53)29 (74)0.034
The use of continuous vasopressor during ICU stay, n (%)34 (57)25 (64)0.461
The use of continuous analgesia during ICU stay, n (%)37 (62)26 (67)0.613
The use of continuous sedation during ICU stay, n (%)45 (75)28 (71)0.723
The use of steroid during ICU stay, n (%)7 (12)14 (35)0.006
The use of neuromuscular blocking agent during ICU stay, n (%)0 (0)5 (13)0.008
The use of dialysis during ICU stay, n (%)7 (12)11 (28)0.037
Average RASS score during the day shift from ICU day 1 to ICU day 3, median (IQR) b0 (0–0)0 (−2–0)0.070
Time to first out of bed mobilization after ICU admission (days)1.7 (0.9–2.0)5.3 (4.0–8.0)<0.001
Highest ICU mobility scale score during ICU stay8 (6–10)4 (3–7)<0.001
Number of daily rehabilitations per person on the ward (minute/time)31 (22–43)34 (27–40)0.331
Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%). IQR = interquartile range; BMI = Body mass index; ICU = Intensive Care Unit; APACHE = Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation; SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; RASS = Richmond agitation sedation scale. a Barthel index before hospitalization was scored at the time of ICU admission based on the information from the family or the patients if they were conscious. b In all participating hospitals, RASS score, as a sedation scale, was monitored every 2 h during the day shift by nurses and recorded in the medical record. The best RASS score, which means the recorded number closest to zero during the day, of each day from days 1 to 3 was used to calculate the average value of RASS.
Table
Table 2. Outcomes: psychiatric disorders in ICU survivors.
Table 2. Outcomes: psychiatric disorders in ICU survivors.
OutcomesEarly Mobilization Group
(n = 60)		Non-Early
Mobilization Group (n = 39)		p ValueAdjusted b
p Value
Primary Outcome
Follow-up at 3 months after discharge
Patients with psychiatric symptoms, n (%) a15 (25)20 (51)0.0080.032
At the time of hospital discharge
Patients with psychiatric symptoms, n (%) a20 (33)17 (46)0.2140.965
Secondary Outcomes
Follow-up at 3 months after discharge
  Patients who scored HADS subset for depression ≥8, n (%)12 (20)15 (39)0.0440.107
  HADS subset score for depression, median (IQR)4 (2–7)6 (2–9)0.1420.223
  Patients who scored HADS subset for anxiety ≥8, n (%)5 (8)12 (30)0.0040.104
  HADS subset score for anxiety, median (IQR)3 (1–5)6 (4–8)<0.0010.004
  Patients who scored IES-R ≥25, n (%)1 (2)9 (23)<0.0010.026
  IES-R score, median (IQR)4 (1–9)9 (4–20)<0.0010.009
At the time of hospital discharge
Patients who scored HADS subset for depression ≥8, n (%)16 (27)15 (40)0.1550.917
HADS subset score for depression, median (IQR)4 (2–8)6 (4–9)0.0860.471
Patients who scored HADS subset for anxiety ≥8, n (%)11 (18)7 (19)0.9430.772
HADS subset score for anxiety, median (IQR)3 (1–6)4 (2–7)0.3920.448
Patients who scored IES-R ≥25, n (%)2 (3)5 (14)0.1020.266
IES-R score, median (IQR)6 (2–12)10 (4–17)0.0520.163
Changes between follow-up at 3 months and hospital discharge
HADS subset score for depression, median (IQR)1 (−2–3)1 (−1–3)0.9280.418
HADS subset score for anxiety, median (IQR)1 (−2–4)−1 (−4–1)0.0060.032
IES-R score, median (IQR)1 (−2–7)−1 (−7–5)0.0530.131
Data are presented as number (%) or median (interquartile range). ICU = Intensive Care Unit, HADS = Hospital anxiety and depression scale, IQR = interquartile range, IES-R = Impact of event scale-revised, EQ-5D-5L = EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels. a Psychiatric symptoms were defined as the presence of at least one of three symptoms; depression, anxiety, and PTSD. b Multiple linear for continuous variable or multiple logistic regression analysis for nominal variables were performed to identify an association of the primary outcome with the following covariates. The covariates in the multi-variates analysis included age, male gender, Barthel index before hospitalization, ICU admission diagnosis (acute respiratory failure, cardiovascular disease, gastric or colonic surgery, sepsis, other), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, use of mechanical ventilation, use of continuous analgesia, use of continuous sedation, use of steroids, use of neuromuscular blocking agents, and use of dialysis.
Table
Table 3. Association between early mobilization and the presence of psychiatric symptoms.
Table 3. Association between early mobilization and the presence of psychiatric symptoms.
VariablesRisk Ratio
(95% CI)		Unadjusted Odds Ratio
(95% CI)		Adjusted b Odds Ratio
(95% CI)
Follow-up at 3 months after discharge
Presence of psychiatric
Symptoms a		0.49 (0.29–0.83) *0.32 (0.13–0.74) **0.27 (0.08–0.89) *
HADS depression score ≥80.52 (0.27–0.99) **0.40 (0.16–0.98) *0.37 (0.11–1.24)
HADS anxiety score ≥80.27 (0.10–0.71) ***0.20 (0.06–0.61) **0.23 (0.06–1.31)
IES-R score ≥250.07 (0.01–0.54) ***0.06 (0.01–0.32) ***0.06 (0.01–0.70) *
At hospital discharge
Presence of psychiatric
Symptoms a		0.73 (0.44–1.20)0.59 (0.25–1.36)1.03 (0.33–3.14)
HADS depression score ≥80.66 (0.37–1.16)0.53 (0.22–1.27)1.07 (0.29–3.91)
HADS anxiety score ≥80.97 (0.41–2.27)0.96 (0.34–2.87)1.23 (0.30–5.05)
IES-R score ≥250.25 (0.05–1.20)0.22 (0.03–1.09)0.01 (0.01–52.4)
The data are presented as risk ratio or odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. * <0.05, ** <0.01, *** <0.001. HADS = Hospital anxiety and depression scale, IES-R = Impact of event scale-revised, CI = Confidence interval. a Psychiatric symptoms are defined as the presence of at least one of three symptoms; depression, anxiety, and PTSD. b Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify an association of the primary outcome with the following covariates. The covariates in the multi-variates analysis included age, male gender, Barthel index before hospitalization, ICU admission diagnosis (acute respiratory failure, cardiovascular disease, gastric or colonic surgery, sepsis, other), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, use of mechanical ventilation, use of continuous analgesia, use of continuous sedation, use of steroids, use of neuromuscular blocking agents, and use of dialysis.
Table
Table 4. Comparison of clinical outcomes between early mobilization group and non-early mobilization group.
Table 4. Comparison of clinical outcomes between early mobilization group and non-early mobilization group.
OutcomesEarly
Mobilization Group
(n = 60)		Non-Early
Mobilization Group
(n = 39)		p ValueAdjusted a p Value a
Health-related quality of life
The EQ-5D-5L index at the time of 3 month after hospital discharge0.89
(0.70–0.94)		0.82
(0.70–0.94)		0.2350.952
The EQ-5D-5L index at the time of hospital discharge0.81
(0.71–0.89)		0.70
(0.44–0.94)		0.3840.926
Clinical outcomes and physical assessment
The number of patients who can walk independently at the time of hospital discharge58 (97)33 (85)0.0320.136
Duration of mechanical ventilation (days)1.4 (1–2)4.4 (2–8.7)<0.0010.326
ICU length of stay (days)4 (3–5)7 (5–13)<0.001<0.001
Hospital length of stay (days)22 (19–29)32 (22–51)0.0040.009
Barthel index at hospital discharge100 (90–100)90 (70–100)0.0220.020
The number of patients who diagnosed as delirium during ICU stay11 (18)16 (41)0.0130.001
The number of patients who diagnosed as ICU acquired weakness at the time of ICU discharge2 (3)8 (21)0.0060.004
Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%). IQR = interquartile range; ICU = Intensive Care Unit; IMS = ICU mobility scale. a Multiple linear for continuous variable or multiple logistic regression analysis for nominal variable were performed to identify an association of the primary outcome with the following covariates. The covariates in the multi-variates analysis included age, male gender, Barthel index before hospitalization, ICU admission diagnosis (acute respiratory failure, cardiovascular disease, gastric or colonic surgery, sepsis, other), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score, use of mechanical ventilation, use of continuous analgesia, use of continuous sedation, use of steroids, use of neuromuscular blocking agents and use of dialysis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Watanabe, S.; Liu, K.; Nakamura, K.; Kozu, R.; Horibe, T.; Ishii, K.; Yasumura, D.; Takahashi, Y.; Nanba, T.; Morita, Y.; et al. Association between Early Mobilization in the ICU and Psychiatric Symptoms after Surviving a Critical Illness: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092587

AMA Style

Watanabe S, Liu K, Nakamura K, Kozu R, Horibe T, Ishii K, Yasumura D, Takahashi Y, Nanba T, Morita Y, et al. Association between Early Mobilization in the ICU and Psychiatric Symptoms after Surviving a Critical Illness: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(9):2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092587

Chicago/Turabian Style

Watanabe, Shinichi, Keibun Liu, Kensuke Nakamura, Ryo Kozu, Tatsuya Horibe, Kenzo Ishii, Daisetsu Yasumura, You Takahashi, Tomoya Nanba, Yasunari Morita, and et al. 2022. "Association between Early Mobilization in the ICU and Psychiatric Symptoms after Surviving a Critical Illness: A Multi-Center Prospective Cohort Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 9: 2587. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092587

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop