Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination in Different Skeletal Classes
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ohrbach, R.; Michelotti, A. The role of stress in the etiology of oral parafunction and myofascial pain. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 30, 369–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chow, J.C.; Cioffi, I. Effects of trait anxiety, somatosensory amplification, and facial pain on self-reported oral behaviors. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019, 23, 1653–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gatchel, R.J.; Garofalo, J.P.; Ellis, E.; Holt, C. Major psychological disorders in acute and chronic TMD: An initial examination. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1996, 127, 1365–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Manfredini, D.; Bandettini di Poggio, A.; Cantini, E.; Dell’Osso, L.; Bosco, M. Mood and anxiety psychopathology and temporomandibular disorder: A spectrum approach. J. Oral Rehabil. 2004, 31, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wieckiewicz, M.; Grychowska, N.; Wojciechowski, K.; Pelc, A.; Augustyniak, K.; Sleboda, A.; Zietek, M. Prevalence and correlation between TMD based on RDC/TMD diagnoses, oral parafunctions and psychoemotional stress in Polish university students. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 472346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kostrzewa-Janicka, J.; Pietrzak, B.; Jurkowski, P.; Wielgos, M.; Binkowska, M.; Mierzwińska-Nastalska, E. Effects of oral contraceptives on the treatment for internal derangements in temporomandibular joints in women. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2013, 34, 566–572. [Google Scholar]
- LeResche, L.; Saunders, K.; Von Korff, M.R.; Barlow, W.; Dworkin, S.F. Use of exogenous hormones and risk of temporomandibular disorder pain. Pain 1997, 69, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotrzewa-Janicka, J.; Anulewicz, A.; Magciak, M.; Meredyk, K.; Jurkowski, P. Effects of general factors on temporomandibular joint dysfunction treatment effectiveness. Protet. Stomatol. 2015, 3, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bucci, R.; Koutris, M.; Palla, S.; Rebaudo, G.F.; Lobbezoo, F.; Michelotti, A. Occlusal tactile acuity in temporomandibular disorder patients: A case control study. J Oral Rehabil. 2020, 47, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bucci, R.; Koutris, M.; Lobbezoo, F.; Michelotti, A. Occlusal sensitivity in individuals with different frequencies of oral parafunction. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2019, 122, 119–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Surowiecki, D.; Szerszeń, M.; Wróbel-Bednarz, K.; Walczyk, A. Compatibility of the digital design of prosthetic crowns with restorations made in the technology of selective laser sintering of metal powders. Protet. Stomatol. 2020, 70, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gawlak, D.; Łuniewska, J.; Stojak, W.; Hovhannisyan, A.; Stróżyńska, A.; Mańka-Malara, K.; Adamiec, M.; Rysz, A. The prevalence of orodental trauma during epileptic seizures in terms of dental treatment—Survey study. Neurol. Neurochir. Pol. 2017, 51, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Gawlak, D.; Mańka-Malara, K.; Mierzwińska-Nastalska, E.; Waśniewski, B.; Ryszkowska, J. Comparison of hardness, energy absorption and water absorbability of polymeric materials used in the manufacture of mouthguards. Dent. Med. Probl. 2015, 52, 78–85. [Google Scholar]
- Kondrat, W.; Sierpińska, T.; Gołębiewska, M. Electronic diagnostics in the study of functional mandibular movements. Protet. Stomatol. 2009, 1, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
- Dejak, A.; Gliszczyńska, A.; Kapiczke, A.; Dejak, B. Comparison of TMJ angles based on the ARCUSdigma II examination and occlusion records in the Protar 7 articulator. Protet. Stomatol. 2018, 68, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Torabi, K.; Pour, S.R.; Ahangari, A.H.; Ghodsi, S. A clinical comparative study of Cadiax Compact II and intraoral records using wax and addition silicone. Int. J. Prosthdont. 2014, 27, 541–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- R Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2021. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 20 March 2022).
- Cohen, J. 1988 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caro, A.J.; Peraire, M.; Martinez-Gomis, J.; Anglada, J.M.; Samsó, J. Reproductibility of lateral excursive tooth contact in a semi-adjustable articulator depending on the type of lateral guidance. J. Oral Rehabil. 2005, 32, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alshali, R.Z.; Yar, R.; Barclay, C.; Satterthwaite, S.D. Sagittal condylar angle and gender differences. J. Prosthodont. 2013, 22, 561–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Canning, T.; O’Connell, B.C.; Houston, F.; O’Sullivan, M. The effect of skeletal pattern on determining articulator settings for prosthodontic rehabilitation: An in vivo study. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2011, 24, 16–25. [Google Scholar]
- Zimmer, B.; Jäger, A.; Kubein-Meesenburg, D. Comparison of ‘normal’ TMJ-function in Class I, II, and III individuals. Eur. J. Orthod. 1991, 13, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cimić, S.; Simunković, S.K.; Catić, A. The relationship between Angle type of occlusion and recorded Bennett angle values. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2016, 115, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Taylor, C.M. Changes in the relationship of nasion point A and point B and the effect upon ANB. Am. J. Orthod. 1969, 56, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, A. The ‘Wits’ appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am. J. Orthod. 1975, 67, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freeman, R.S. Adjusting A-N-B angles to reflect the effects of maxillary position. Angle Orthod. 1981, 51, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Rushton, R.; Cohen, A.M.; Linney, A.D. The relationship and reproducibility of angle ANB and the Wits appraisal. Br. J. Orthod. 1991, 18, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rotberg, S.; Fried, N.; Kane, J.; Shapiro, E. Predicting the ‘Wits’ appraisal from the ANB angle. Am. J. Orthod. 1980, 77, 636–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roth, R. The ‘Wits’ appraisal—Its skeletal and dentoalveolar background. Eur. J. Orthod. 1982, 4, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherman, S.L.; Woods, M.; Nanda, R.S. The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits appraisal. Am. J. Orthod. Dent. Orthop. 1988, 93, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez, A.I.; Jasinevicius, T.R.; Kaleinikova, Z.; Sadan, A. Symmetry of horizontal and sagittal condylar path angles: An in vivo study. Cranio 2010, 28, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hüe, O. Condylar paths during protrusion in edentulous patients: Analysis with electronic axiography. J. Prosthodont. 2011, 20, 294–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schierz, O.; Klinger, N.; Schön, G.; Reissmann, D.R. The reliability of computerized condylar path angle assessment. Int. J. Comput. Dent. 2014, 17, 35–51. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Abrahamsson, C.; Henrikson, T.; Bondemark, L.; Ekhberg, E. Masticatiory function in patients with dentofacial deformities before and after orthognatic treatment—A prospective, longitudinal, and controlled study. Eur. J. Orthod. 2015, 37, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cimić, S.; Simunković, S.K.; Badel, T.; Dulcić, N.; Alajbeg, I.; Catić, A. Measurements of the sagittal condylar inclination: Intraindividual variations. Cranio 2014, 32, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maglione, H.O.; Roldan, O.V.; Carreira, R.; Mainieri, S. Analysis of condylar path inclination and incisal guidance. Cranio 1989, 7, 300–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kucukkeles, N.; Ozkan, H.; Ari-Demirkaya, A.; Cilingirturk, A.M. Compatibiity of mechanical and computerized axiographs: A pilot study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2005, 94, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- dos Santos, J.; Nelson, S.; Nowlin, T. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: A pilot study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003, 89, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curtis, D.A. A comparison of protrusive interocclusal records to pantographic tracings. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1989, 62, 154–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cimić, S.; Simunković, S.K.; Simonić Kocijan, S.; Matijević, J.; Dulcić, N.; Catić, A. Articulator-related registration and analysis of sagittal condylar inclination. Acta Clin. Croat. 2015, 54, 432–437. [Google Scholar]
- Konaté, N.Y.; Djérédou, K.B.; Kamagaté, F.S.; Thiam, A.; Pesson, D.M.; Assi, K.D.; Touré, S. Determination of the average value of the condylar slope of black Africans. Odontostomatol. Trop. 2008, 31, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
- Han, B.; Kang, H.; Liu, L.; Yi, X.; Li, X. Comparisons of condylar movements with the functional occlusal clutch and tray clutch recordings methods in CADIAX system. Int. J. Oral Sci. 2010, 2, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matsumura, H.; Tsukiyama, Y.; Koyano, K. Analysis of sagittal condylar path inclination in consideration of Fischer’s angle. J. Oral Rehabil. 2006, 33, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Theusner, J.; Plesh, O.; Curtis, D.A.; Hutton, J.E. Axiographic tracings of temporomandibular joint movements. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1993, 69, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boulos, P.J.; Adib, S.M.; Naltchayan, L.J. The horizontal condylar inclination: Clinical comparison of different recording methods. Gen. Dent. 2007, 55, 112–116. [Google Scholar]
- English, J.D.; Buschang, P.H.; Throckmorton, G.S. Does malloclusion affect masticatory performance? Angle Orthod. 2002, 72, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Ugolini, A.; Mapelli, A.; Segù, M.; Zago, M.; Codari, M.; Sforza, A. Three-dimensional mandibular motion in skeletal Class-III patients. Cranio 2018, 36, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tamimi, Z.Z.; Alhaija, E.S.A.; AlWahadni, A.M.; Al-Ajlouni, Y. Bite force changes after surgical correction of mandibular prognatism in subjects with increased vertical dimention: A prospective clinical trial. J. Orofac. Orthop. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ringqvist, M. Isometric bite force and its relation to dimensions of the facial skeleton. Acta Odontol. Scand. 1973, 31, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Proffit, W.R.; Fields, H.W. Occlusal forces in normal- and long-face children. J. Dent. Res. 1983, 62, 571–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakke, M.; Tuxen, A.; Vilmann, P.; Jensen, B.R.; Vilmann, A.; Toft, M. Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors. Scand. J. Dent. Res. 1992, 100, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kostrzewa-Janicka, J. The bite force and its relation to facial morphology in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Protet. Stomatol. 2007, 57, 316–324. [Google Scholar]
- Santander, P.; Quast, A.; Olbrish, C.; Rose, M.; Moser, N.; Schliephake, H.; Meyer-Marcotty, P. Comprehensive 3D analysis of condylar morphology in adults with different skeletal patterns—A cross-sectional study. Head Face Med. 2020, 16, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hasebe, A.; Yamaguchi, T.; Nakawaki, T.; Hikita, Y.; Katayama, K.; Maki, K. Comparison of condylar size among different anterioposterior and vertical skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2019, 89, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chae, J.M.; Park, J.H.; Tai, K.; Mizutani, K.; Uzuka, S.; Miyashita, W.; Seo, H.Y. Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in adolescents with various skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2020, 90, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Arieta-Miranda, J.M.; Silva-Valencia, M.; Flores-Mir, C.; Paredes-Sampen, N.A.; Arriola-Guillen, L.E. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography. Prog Orthod. 2013, 18, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Katsavrias, E.G.; Halazonetis, D.J. Condyle and fossa shape in Class II and Class III skeletal patterns: A morphometric tomographic study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2005, 128, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Katsavrias, E.G. Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in subjects with Class II division 2 malocclusions. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2006, 129, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Class | N | Min | Q1 | Median | Average | Q3 | Max | SD | SE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | 75 | 32 | 43.0 | 50.0 | 49.2 | 55.5 | 70 | 8.5 | 0.98 |
I | 23 | 32 | 45.8 | 51.5 | 51.0 | 55.8 | 70 | 7.9 | 1.65 |
II | 29 | 39 | 47.0 | 52.0 | 51.8 | 56.0 | 70 | 7.6 | 1.41 |
III | 23 | 32 | 37.2 | 42.5 | 43.6 | 49.5 | 61 | 8.1 | 1.69 |
Class | N | Min | Q1 | Median | Average | Q3 | Max | SD | SE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | 75 | 24 | 44.0 | 50 | 49.7 | 55.0 | 70 | 9.3 | 1.07 |
I | 23 | 40 | 49.2 | 52 | 52.2 | 55.8 | 70 | 6.7 | 1.40 |
II | 29 | 28 | 46.8 | 52 | 51.8 | 55.2 | 70 | 9.2 | 1.71 |
III | 23 | 24 | 38.0 | 41 | 44.2 | 50.0 | 64 | 9.7 | 2.02 |
Class | N | Min | Q1 | Median | Average | Q3 | Max | SD | SE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | 75 | 0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 4.1 | 6.0 | 18 | 4.6 | 0.53 |
I | 23 | 0 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 10.5 | 17 | 5.0 | 1.04 |
II | 29 | 0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 5.0 | 16 | 3.6 | 0.67 |
III | 23 | 0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 18 | 5.1 | 1.06 |
Class | N | Min | Q1 | Median | Average | Q3 | Max | SD | SE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | 75 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.3 | 7 | 22 | 5.2 | 0.60 |
I | 23 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5.2 | 7 | 22 | 6.0 | 1.25 |
II | 29 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4.1 | 7 | 15 | 5.1 | 0.95 |
III | 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3.6 | 5 | 16 | 4.5 | 0.94 |
The Coefficient for the ANB Angle | The Average from the Model | The p-Value of Test F | R2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
SCI Left | 0.77 | 47.5 | 0.012 | 0.098 |
SCI Right | 0.72 | 48.5 | 0.039 | 0.069 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lewandowska, A.; Mańka-Malara, K.; Kostrzewa-Janicka, J. Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination in Different Skeletal Classes. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092664
Lewandowska A, Mańka-Malara K, Kostrzewa-Janicka J. Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination in Different Skeletal Classes. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(9):2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092664
Chicago/Turabian StyleLewandowska, Anahit, Katarzyna Mańka-Malara, and Jolanta Kostrzewa-Janicka. 2022. "Sagittal Condylar Inclination and Transversal Condylar Inclination in Different Skeletal Classes" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 9: 2664. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092664