Next Article in Journal
Retrospective In-Hospital Mortality Analysis of GeriatricPatients Treated in a Level 1 Trauma Center
Previous Article in Journal
Observations on the Present and the Future of Hip Surgery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thromboembolic Complications in Adult Patients Following Fontan Procedure—A Multicenter Study

by
Maciej Skubera
1,
Aleksandra Gołąb
2,3,*,
Tomasz Sternalski
4,
Olga Trojnarska
5,
Dariusz Plicner
6,7,
Monika Smaś-Suska
8,
Anna Mazurek-Kula
9,
Agnieszka Bartczak-Rutkowska
5,
Jacek Pająk
10,
Piotr Podolec
1,11 and
Lidia Tomkiewicz-Pająk
1,8,11
1
Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
2
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
3
Center for Research and Innovative Technology, John Paul II Hospital, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
4
Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum Jagiellonian University, 31-008 Krakow, Poland
5
1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland
6
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantation, John Paul II Hospital, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
7
Unit of Experimental Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, 30-705 Krakow, Poland
8
Department of Liver Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
9
Department of Cardiology, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital, Research Institute, 93-338 Lodz, Poland
10
Institute of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Rzeszow University, 35-025 Rzeszow, Poland
11
Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-008 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(10), 3465; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103465
Submission received: 20 February 2023 / Revised: 20 April 2023 / Accepted: 12 May 2023 / Published: 14 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)

Abstract

:
Background: Morbidity and mortality following Fontan (FO) surgery are primarily thromboembolic in nature. However, follow-up data regarding thromboembolic complications (TECs) in adult patients after FO procedure are inconsistent. In this multicenter study, we investigated the incidence of TECs in FO patients. Methods: We studied 91 patients who underwent FO procedure. Clinical data, laboratory, and imaging investigations were collected prospectively during the scheduled medical appointments in 3 Adult Congenital Heart Disease Departments in Poland. TECs were recorded during a median follow-up of 31 months. Results: Four patients (4.4%) were lost to follow-up. The mean age of patients was 25.3 (±6.0) years at enrollment, and the mean time between FO operation and investigation was 22.1 (±5.1) years. A total of 21 out of 91 patients (23.1%) had a history of 24 TECs since an FO procedure, mainly pulmonary embolism (PE; n = 12, 13.2%), including 4 (33.3%) silent PE. The mean time since FO operation to the first TEC was 17.8 (±5.1) years. During follow-up, we documented 9 TECs in 7 (8.0%) patients, mainly PE (n = 5, 5.5%). Most patients with TEC had a left type of systemic ventricle (57.1%). Three patients (42.9%) were treated with aspirin, 3 (3.4%) with Vitamin K antagonists or novel oral anticoagulants, and 1 patient had no antithrombotic treatment at the time of TEC occurrence. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were present in 3 patients (42.9%). Conclusions: This prospective study shows that TECs are common in FO patients, and a significant number of these events occur during adolescence and young adulthood. We also indicated how much TECs are underestimated in the growing adult FO population. The complexity of the problem requires more studies, especially to standardize the prevention of TECs in the whole FO population.

1. Introduction

The Fontan (FO) operation is an end-stage palliative procedure used to treat univentricular physiology and has significantly improved the survival of patients [1,2]. However, FO patients have an increased risk of thromboembolic complications (TECs) compared to age-matched controls, and despite numerous prophylactic anticoagulation algorithms, TECs are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after FO procedures [3]. Several theories have been suggested to explain the hypercoagulable state in FO patients [4,5]. Well-known risk factors for the development of TEC include chronic venous congestion, high prevalence of supraventricular arrhythmias, the presence of prosthetic material, residual intracardiac shunt, or protein-losing enteropathy [6,7]. We have already shown that adult FO patients are also characterized by hepatic dysfunction as well as enhanced platelet activation, endothelial injury, and impaired fibrinolysis [8,9].
Follow-up data in patients after an FO procedure have shown an overall TECs rate ranging between 8 and 33% and account for about 8% of all FO patients’ deaths [4,10,11]. Incidence varies and can be attributed to different definitions and also distinct diagnostic methods of the TECs as well as insufficient follow-up data [12,13]. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence rate of TECs in FO patients and to investigate the associations between demographic, anatomical, and clinical factors along with TECs in this group of patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

In this multicenter report, we studied 91 patients who underwent FO procedure. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were collected prospectively during the scheduled medical appointments in 3 Adult Congenital Heart Disease Departments in Poland (Krakow, Poznan, and Lodz) between June 2018 and September 2019. Follow-up was scheduled according to the regular outpatient visits with a 1 year time interval.
The previous and current history of antithrombotic therapy were recorded. Comorbidities were assessed in groups based on the affected system with separate distinctions of thromboembolism and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs). The exclusion criteria for FO patients were as follows: any acute illness, diabetes mellitus, serum creatinine level > 120 µmol/L, malignant neoplasms, alcohol abuse, or pregnancy.
TECs were classified as pulmonary embolism (PE), stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), Fontan circuit thrombus (FCT), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), or peripheral systemic thrombosis (PST). The diagnosis of PE was based on the presence of typical symptoms and positive results of ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy, according to current guidelines [14]. This method was preferred over high-resolution computed tomography to reduce whole-life irradiation dose. Stroke and TIA were defined according to the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Guidelines [15]. FCT was defined as the presence of the thrombotic material in the proximal inferior vena cava, FO conduit, tunnel, or right atrium in subjects operated on using the classic atriopulmonary technique [16]. Diagnosis of DVT and PST were established in symptomatic subjects with positive ultrasound results, according to the respective guidelines [14,17]. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was used to estimate the risk of initial stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation [18].
Events were diagnosed based on individual patient reports or supplementary imaging when clinical symptoms or alterations in laboratory results were observed. Confirmatory imaging studies were obtained and analyzed before TEC occurrence. Depending on the type of TEC, the diagnosis was established using echocardiography, vascular ultrasound, angiography, or ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. SVTs were described as either standard or Holter monitoring ECG findings of atrial fibrillation or flutter. The decision on the type of antithrombotic agent was left to the cardiologist providing regular treatment.
This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (130/KBL/OIL/2018). Patients provided written informed consent. Personally identifiable information of the participants was anonymized upon extraction of the relevant data for the study.

2.2. Laboratory Investigation

Fasting blood samples were collected into 0.1 volume of 3.2% trisodium citrate from the antecubital vein with minimal stasis on the same day that clinical data were recorded. In anticoagulated patients, blood was drawn at least 5 days after anticoagulation withdrawal. Citrated blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 g for 20 min and stored in aliquots at −80 °C until further use. Red blood cell count, white blood cell count, platelet count, hematocrit level, total protein level, alanine aminotransferase level, creatinine level, C-reactive protein level, and international normalized ratio were assayed by routine laboratory techniques.
Fibrinogen was determined using the thrombin clotting time method. Coagulation factors (F) V, FVII, FVIII, FIX, and FX were measured by 1-stage clotting assays using factor-deficient plasmas (Siemens, Marburg, Germany). Antithrombin activity was measured using Berichrom (Siemens). Protein C activity was measured using a chromogenic substrate assay (Siemens). Protein S was determined using a latex ligand immunoassay (Instrumentation Laboratory, Milan, Italy). The immunoenzymatic assay was used to determine plasma prothrombin fragments 1.2 (F1.2; Siemens). Plasma PAI-1 antigen levels were measured by an ELISA (American Diagnostica, Greenwich, Conn). Thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI) antigen was determined with an ELISA (Chromogenix, Lexington, Mass). Plasma TAFI activity was measured by a chromogenic assay using the Actichrome Plasma TAFI Activity Kit (American Diagnostica). Von Willebrand Factor (vWF) activity and antigen (Diagnostica Stago) were also measured in plasma.
All the hemostatic measurements were performed by technicians blinded to the sample status. The coefficients of intra-assay and interassay variations were less than 9%.

2.3. Echocardiography and Shear Wave Elastography

The ejection fraction of the single ventricle was assessed using a semi-qualitative assessment. Valvular competence was also evaluated in the patients by two experienced, independent cardiologists using echocardiography (Vivid 7, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) as previously described [19].
Shear wave elastography was performed using a Philips iU22 XMatrix Ultrasound System (Amsterdam, Netherlands) by an experienced physician. For each patient, 10 measurements were taken for the liver stiffness estimation.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to outline the baseline characteristics. Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR). Normality was assessed by Shapiro–Wilk test. Categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Differences between groups were compared using the Student’s or Welch’s t-test depending on the equality of variances for normally distributed variables. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used for non-normally distributed continuous variables. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were created to determine event-free survival from TECs. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica®, Version 13.3.721 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Fontan Patients

As shown in Table 1, we studied 91 FO patients who underwent FO procedures at a mean age of 5.2 (±3.9) years. The mean time between operation and investigation was 22.1 (±5.1) years. More than half of FO patients had a pre-operative ventricular septal defect in single ventricle physiology (56%). The majority of them were operated using the lateral tunnel technique (89.0%), and nearly half of them had fenestration performed (45.1%). Systemic ventricle anatomy was left in major (66.3%) of patients. The most frequently recorded complications were hepatic ones (37.7%), and aspirin therapy was implemented in half of the studied patients (53.8%). Thirty (33.0%) of the studied patients were treated with oral anticoagulants (Table 1).
The mean age of FO patients at enrollment was 25.3 (±6.0) years. Patients who experienced TEC had lower baseline oxygen saturation and more commonly had varices compared to patients free of this complication. Moreover, laboratory investigation showed lower values of coagulation factors: V, VII, IX, X, and protein S, as well as thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor in this group of patients. We also observed increased activity of the von Willebrand Factor in patients with a history of TEC. There were no other differences in baseline clinical and laboratory variables (Table 2).

3.2. Thromboembolic Events Profile at Enrollment

Twenty-one patients (23.1%) had developed 24 TECs since their FO procedure (1.2 per 100 patient-years). As shown in Table 3, the mainly observed TEC type was PE (n = 12, 13.2%), including 4 silent ones (33.3%). Other thrombus locations included FO circuit in 6 (6.6%) cases, intracranial in 4 (4.4%), and peripheral vasculature in 2 patients (2.2%).
Table 3 shows that among this subgroup of studied patients, 71.4% had a left type of systemic ventricle, and 57.1% had fenestration, mainly in those patients who underwent stroke/TIA (in 100% and 75% cases, respectively) and DVT (in 100% and 100% cases, respectively) or PST (in 100% and 100% cases, respectively). The prevalence of SVTs was 37.5%. One patient with DVT and 1 with a PST history had a left type of systemic ventricle and fenestration performed, as well as diagnosed SVTs. The occurrence of a specific type of TEC event was not related to sex in the studied group.
The Kaplan–Meier curve shows overall freedom from TEC since the FO procedure (Figure 1). The mean time since FO operation to the first TEC was 17.8 (±5.1) years. An increase in TECs incidence can be observed approximately 16.0–17.0 years after FO operation.

3.3. Follow-Up

Four patients (4.4%) were lost to follow-up. One patient (1.1%) died due to respiratory tract bleeding complications during the Bentall De Bono procedure, and 1 subject (1.1%) as a result of massive gastrointestinal bleeding in a clinical progression of what is widely described as the ‘Failing Fontan’ phenotype. Additionally, 2 female patients (2.2%) were excluded due to pregnancy.
Fifteen patients (16.5%) had switched antithrombotic medication during the follow-up period, with a mean time to medication switch 15.8 (±9.3) months. In 11 cases, antithrombotic therapy was switched to novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) [7 from aspirin and 4 from vitamin K antagonist (VKA)] and in 2 cases to VKA (1 from aspirin and 1 from NOAC). There was 1 (1.1%) case of a therapy-naive patient who had secondary NOAC prophylaxis started after the development of DVT with FCT. One patient had primary prophylaxis after aspirin was initiated (Figure 2).
During a mean follow-up of 30.3 months (±5.6), we documented TEC in 7 (8.0%) patients (4.1 per 100 patient-years). As shown in Table 4, we recorded 5 (5.5%) PEs, 1 (1.1%) FCT, and 3 (3.3%) cases of DVT. There was no cerebrovascular event recorded during the follow-up. A thrombus in the right side of the heart was not detected by echocardiography. In this group of patients, the mean time from FO operation to TEC was 22.1 (±11.8) years. TECs were recorded slightly more often in men (57.1%). The most common TEC was PE (71.4%), out of which 1 was recurrent embolism (Table 3). In this group, 3 patients (42.9%) had a history of previous TEC. Adverse outcomes occurred in 14.3% of patients with a history of previous TEC and in 5.7% of patients with no events at baseline. Most patients with TEC had a left type of systemic ventricle (57.1%).
At the time of TEC occurrence, 3 (42.9%) patients were on anticoagulant therapy (1 patient on VKA and 2 patients on NOAC treatment), while the remaining 3 (42.9%) patients were treated with aspirin. After TEC, the anticoagulant treatment was continued in those 3 cases, whereas 3 patients were switched from aspirin to NOAC. One (14.3%) therapy-naive patient was started on NOAC due to TEC occurence.
The CHA2DS2-VASc score was ≥ 2 in 3 patients (42.9%), whereas others had a CHA2DS2-VASc score equal to 0. SVTs were present in 3 patients (42.9%).

4. Discussion

This study describes the demographic, anatomical, and clinical characteristics of FO adult patients, as well as their antithrombotic treatment along with TECs profile, for 22 years after FO surgery. We confirmed that TECs are common in FO patients, which may adversely affect the prognosis after FO palliation. Further studies are needed to evaluate the causes of the prothrombotic state in FO adults on the basis that it will be possible to extract a subgroup of high-risk patients and standardize antithrombotic prophylaxis to reduce the TECs rate.
It has been previously established that changes in circulation among patients with FO physiology, i.e., non-pulsative flow in the pulmonary circulation, slow venous flow, and hypoxemia, lead to endothelial as well liver injury, two primary sites for synthesis of pro- and anticoagulant agents and finally results in the prothrombotic state in the FO population [9,20]. Of note, these alterations simultaneously predispose to bleeds; however, those events are recorded less frequently than TECs in FO patients [8,9]. Deshaies et al. revealed the greatest increase in TECs post-surgery between 15 and 20 years of age [21]. At the same time, Khairy et al. found that the cumulative hazard for thromboembolic death increased steadily for 15 years after FO surgery [3]. We confirmed these findings, and we also showed that the constant progression of circulatory alterations is manifested by the first episode of TEC, mostly in adolescents and young adults. In contrast to our study, Idorn et al. and Rosenthal et al. showed that the mean time from FO surgery to the first TEC was shorter [17.8 (±5.1) vs. 5.0 (±5.5) and 6.1 (±5.0) years, respectively] [22,23]. Several factors, such as the size of the study group, age at FO operation, type of FO surgery, type of thromboprophylaxis, or other documented risk factors such as low post-operative cardiac index, may have an influence on the differences in time to the appearance of the first adverse episode [24]. Only 7.7% of studied patients were in the NYHA functional class III or IV at enrollment; thus, there were not many subjects who had developed severe heart failure, which may partly explain this relationship.
TECs are frequently recorded adverse events in patients with FO physiology [6,9]. In addition, Yang et al. revealed that among the whole group of adults with congenital heart disease, 50% of TECs occurred in FO patients, who constituted only 14% of the study population [25]. Therefore, primary and secondary prophylaxis were used in daily practice, although controversy exists about the optimal prevention strategy. Classically, the basis of antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is carried out with aspirin or VKA [24]. Recent reports showed that aspirin is generally not an inferior antithrombotic therapy to VKA (in our study, 53.8% vs. 22.1% used at baseline) [11,21]. Nevertheless, due to important limitations, i.e., high rate of aspirin resistance and difficulties in achieving a consistent international normalized ratio range with VKA among the FO population, the newest research tries to improve thromboprophylaxis through NOAC implementation, which provides easier use, e.g., no need of laboratory monitoring of its effectiveness and lower number of drug interactions [12,26]. The lack of knowledge about NOAC safety and effectiveness in recent guidelines might be the reason why the population taking NOAC at baseline was approximately two times lower than the one taking VKA in this study [27,28]. Eleven percent of FO adults had been taking NOAC at baseline, and an additional 12.0% had NOAC introduced, as an alternative to aspirin or VKA, during follow-up. Finally, TECs occurred with a similar percentage among NOAC and aspirin groups (10.0% vs. 7.3%). Less often, adverse events occurred in the group of patients on VKA (5.6%). Notably, our study cannot settle uncertainties that regard the safety and efficacy of NOAC treatment in FO patients due to the small size of the study group and the disproportionate distribution of thromboprophylaxis, which caused the data to be underestimated. This issue needs to be investigated in a larger study group.
Data about typical thrombus localization are also inconsistent. There are studies that mainly recorded venous localizations, while others showed mostly systemic thrombi, defined as cardiac, neurological, peripheral arterial, renal, or mesenteric thromboembolism [21,22,24]. Quite frequent are intracardiac thrombi, mainly in the right atrium [6]. In our study, we showed that thrombi were located primarily in pulmonary circulation in the form of PE events, of which almost 34% were silent PE, i.e., without clinically visible complications. Almost two times fewer silent PE events were documented by Varma et al., but in a shorter time from operation [29]. The mentioned study revealed that there is a one in six chance of a silent PE being present in asymptomatic adults FO subjects. Our report, along with this evidence, showed how much TECs are underestimated among the FO population. Hemodynamic and clinical long-term consequences of asymptomatic PE in this population are still unknown. It is certain that increased pulmonary resistance, which is associated with silent PE, adversely affects pulmonary circulation and, finally, might lead to pulmonary vascular disease [29,30]. In addition to the hemodynamic alternations associated with FO circulation affecting endothelial cells, it is suggested that in PE patients, the endothelial injury may be exacerbated by increased sheer stress on the wall of pulmonary vasculature [29,31]. In this current study, we observed that patients, who had a history of TEC at the time of recruitment, had significantly lower resting saturation and enhanced endothelial activity, reflected by increased von Willebrand Factor activity. We previously thoroughly described the relation between endothelial injury and impaired fibrinolysis, which may be a relevant cause of TECs occurrence among the FO population [8,9].
Additional increases in TEC risk occur in the presence of atrial arrhythmia, which occurs in more than 50% of FO adults 20 years after FO palliation [32]. Despite this fact, we failed to show this relation. Moreover, Egbe et al. showed that most cases during TEC diagnosis were asymptomatic in FO patients with atrial arrhythmias [32]. Therefore, there is a need to search for high-risk TEC patients in the FO population actively. The CHA2DS2-VASc score, as a simple and easy-to-use tool, is used in daily practice to establish TEC risk and, eventually, the implementation of therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation diagnosis; however, its usefulness is unclear in the adult congenital heart disease population [33]. Of note, FO subjects are younger compared to the typical population of patients with atrial fibrillation and have a higher TEC risk due to FO circulation. There is still a lack of reports exploring this issue among adult congenital heart disease patients, and this study also shows that there is no correlation between TEC and SVT. The classic CHA2DS2-VASc seems to have an insufficient score in this population; however, this issue requires further analysis. Moreover, Jensen et al. [34] recommended introducing anticoagulation therapy in FO patients even if the CHA2DS2-VASc score is 0. Taken together, a significant thromboembolic risk increase in the FO population with SVT and uncertain usability of the mentioned score makes a need to create appropriate and effective risk estimation in this specific population.
Our study has several limitations. First of all, the size of the studied group was limited, although representative of adult FO patients. Moreover, patients were heterogeneous with respect to cardiac diagnosis and the type of FO surgery, as well as antithrombotic treatment. A higher number of patients would be necessary to draw a firm conclusion.

5. Conclusions

We conclude that TECs are common in FO-operated patients, and a significant number of TECs occur during adolescence and young adulthood. The current study also showed how much TECs are underestimated in the growing adult FO population. The complexity of the problem requires more studies, especially to standardize the prevention of TECs in the whole FO population, which may improve prognosis after FO surgery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G., D.P. and L.T.-P.; Methodology, A.G., D.P. and L.T.-P.; Software, M.S. and D.P.; Validation, D.P. and L.T.-P.; Formal analysis, A.G., D.P. and L.T.-P.; Investigation, M.S., D.P., A.M.-K., A.B.-R. and L.T.-P.; Resources, A.G., T.S., D.P., M.S.-S., A.M.-K. and L.T.-P.; Data curation, M.S., T.S., O.T., M.S.-S., A.M.-K., A.B.-R. and L.T.-P.; Writin—original draft, M.S., A.G., D.P. and L.T.-P.; Writing—review & editing, A.G., O.T., D.P., J.P., P.P. and L.T.-P.; Visualization, D.P.; Supervision, D.P. and L.T.-P.; Project administration, L.T.-P.; Funding acquisition, D.P. and L.T.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This article was supported by the science fund of the John Paul II Hospital, Cracow, Poland (no. FN/5/2023 to M.S).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committee (130/KBL/OIL/2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Firdouse, M.; Agarwal, A.; Chan, A.K.; Mondal, T. Thrombosis and thromboembolic complications in fontan patients: A literature review. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2014, 20, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Monagle, P.; Cochrane, A.; Roberts, R.; Manlhiot, C.; Weintraub, R.; Szechtman, B.; Hughes, M.; Andrew, M.; McCrindle, B.W.; Fontan Anticoagulation Study Group. Multicenter, randomized trial comparing heparin/warfarin and acetylsalicylic acid as primary thromboprophylaxis for 2 years after the Fontan procedure in children. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011, 58, 645–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khairy, P.; Fernandes, S.M.; MayerJr, J.E.; Triedman, J.K.; Walsh, E.P.; Lock, J.E.; Landzberg, M.J. Long-term survival, modes of death, and predictors of mortality in patients with Fontan surgery. Circulation 2008, 117, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jacobs, M.L.; Pourmoghadam, K.K. Thromboembolism and the role of anticoagulation in the Fontan patient. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2007, 28, 457–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gissel, M.; Tomkiewicz-Pajak, L.; Podolec, P.; Hoffman, P.; Trojnarska, O.; Lipczyńska, M.; Undas, A.; Brummel-Ziedins, K.E. In silico thrombin and factor Xa generation profiles in adult patients after Fontan operation. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis. 2018, 29, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Egbe, A.C.; Connolly, H.M.; Niaz, T.; Yogeswaran, V.; Taggart, N.W.; Qureshi, M.Y.; Poterucha, J.T.; Khan, A.R.; Driscoll, D.J. Prevalence and outcome of thrombotic and embolic complications in adults after Fontan operation. Am. Heart J. 2017, 183, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. McCrindle, B.W.; Manlhiot, C.; Cochrane, A.; Roberts, R.; Hughes, M.; Szechtman, B.; Weintraub, R.; Andrew, M.; Monagle, P.; Fontan Anticoagulation Study Group. Factors associated with thrombotic complications after the Fontan procedure: A secondary analysis of a multicenter, randomized trial of primary thromboprophylaxis for 2 years after the Fontan procedure. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2013, 61, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tomkiewicz-Pajak, L.; Hoffman, P.; Trojnarska, O.; Lipczyńska, M.; Podolec, P.; Undas, A. Abnormalities in blood coagulation, fibrinolysis, and platelet activation in adult patients after the Fontan procedure. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2014, 147, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Skubera, M.; Gołąb, A.; Plicner, D.; Natorska, J.; Ząbczyk, M.; Trojnarska, O.; Mazurek-Kula, A.; Smaś-Suska, M.; Bartczak-Rutkowska, A.; Podolec, P.; et al. Properties of Plasma Clots in Adult Patients Following Fontan Procedure: Relation to Clot Permeability and Lysis Time—Multicenter Study. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ono, M.; Boethig, D.; Goerler, H.; Lange, M.; Westhoff-Bleck, M.; Breymann, T. Clinical outcome of patients 20 years after Fontan operation—Effect of fenestration on late morbidity. Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2006, 30, 923–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-Jazairi, A.S.; Al Alshaykh, H.A.; Di Salvo, G.; De Vol, E.B.; Alhalees, Z.Y. Assessment of Late Thromboembolic Complications Post–Fontan Procedure in Relation to Different Antithrombotic Regimens: 30-Years’ Follow-up Experience. Ann. Pharmacother. 2019, 53, 786–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yang, H.; Bouma, B.; Dimopoulos, K.; Khairy, P.; Ladouceur, M.; Niwa, K.; Greutmann, M.; Schwerzmann, M.; Egbe, A.; Scognamiglio, G.; et al. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for thromboembolic prevention, are they safe in congenital heart disease? Results of a worldwide study. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 299, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Georgekutty, J.; Kazerouninia, A.; Wang, Y.; Ermis, P.R.; Parekh, D.R.; Franklin, W.J.; Lam, W.W. Novel oral anticoagulant use in adult Fontan patients: A single center experience. Congenit. Heart Dis. 2018, 13, 541–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Konstantinides, S.V.; Meyer, G.; Becattini, C.; Bueno, H.; Geersing, G.J.; Harjola, V.-P.; Huisman, M.V.; Humbert, M.; Jennings, C.S.; Jiménez, D.; et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 543–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kleindorfer, D.O.; Towfighi, A.; Chaturvedi, S.; Cockroft, K.M.; Gutierrez, J.; Lombardi-Hill, D.; Kamel, H.; Kernan, W.N.; Kittner, S.J.; Leira, E.C.; et al. 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2021, 52, e364–e467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sathananthan, G.; Johal, N.; Verma, T.; Sandhu, S.; Chakrabarti, S.; Riahi, M.; Human, D.; Leipsic, J.; Grewal, J. Clinical Importance of Fontan Circuit Thrombus in the Adult Population: Significant Association With Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Events. Can. J. Cardiol. 2019, 35, 1807–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mazzolai, L.; Aboyans, V.; Ageno, W.; Agnelli, G.; Alatri, A.; Bauersachs, R.; Brekelmans, M.P.; Büller, H.R.; Elias, A.; Farge, D.; et al. Diagnosis and management of acute deep vein thrombosis: A joint consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology working groups of aorta and peripheral vascular diseases and pulmonary circulation and right ventricular function. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 4208–4218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hindricks, G.; Potpara, T.; Dagres, N.; Arbelo, E.; Bax, J.J.; Blomström-Lundqvist, C.; Boriani, G.; Castella, M.; Dan, G.-A.; Dilaveris, P.E.; et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 373–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tomkiewicz-Pajak, L.; Podolec, P.; Drabik, L.; Pajak, J.; Kolcz, J.; Plazak, W. Single ventricle function and exercise tolerance in adult patients after Fontan operation. Acta Cardiol. 2014, 69, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kajimoto, H.; Nakazawa, M.; Murasaki, K.; Mori, Y.; Tanoue, K.; Kasanuki, H.; Nakanishi, T. Increased Thrombogenesity in Patients With Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease. Circ. J. 2007, 71, 948–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Deshaies, C.; Hamilton, R.M.; Shohoudi, A.; Trottier, H.; Poirier, N.; Aboulhosn, J.; Broberg, C.S.; Cohen, S.; Cook, S.; Dore, A.; et al. Thromboembolic Risk After Atriopulmonary, Lateral Tunnel, and Extracardiac Conduit Fontan Surgery. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 74, 1071–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Idorn, L.; Jensen, A.; Juul, K.; Reimers, J.I.; Johansson, P.I.; Sørensen, K.E.; Ostrowski, S.R.; Søndergaard, L. Thromboembolic Complications in Fontan Patients: Population-Based Prevalence and Exploration of the Etiology. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2013, 34, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rosenthal, D.N.; Friedman, A.H.; Kleinman, C.S.; Kopf, G.S.; Rosenfeld, L.E.; Hellenbrand, W.E. Thromboembolic complications after Fontan operations. Circulation 1995, 92 (Suppl. 9), 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Potter, B.J.; Leong-Sit, P.; Fernandes, S.M.; Feifer, A.; Mayer, J.E.; Triedman, J.K.; Walsh, E.P.; Landzberg, M.J.; Khairy, P. Effect of Aspirin and warfarin therapy on thromboembolic events in patients with univentricular hearts and Fontan palliation. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013, 168, 3940–3943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, H.; Veldtman, G.R.; Bouma, B.J.; Budts, W.; Niwa, K.; Meijboom, F.; Scognamiglio, G.; Egbe, A.C.; Schwerzmann, M.; Broberg, C.; et al. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in adults with a Fontan circulation: Are they safe. Open Heart 2019, 6, e000985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tomkiewicz-Pajak, L.; Wojcik, T.; Chłopicki, S.; Olszowska, M.; Pajak, J.; Podolec, J.; Sitek, B.; Musiałek, P.; Rubis, P.; Komar, M.; et al. Aspirin resistance in adult patients after Fontan surgery. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015, 181, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Khairy, P.; Van Hare, G.F.; Balaji, S.; Berul, C.I.; Cecchin, F.; Cohen, M.I.; Daniels, C.J.; Deal, B.J.; Dearani, J.A.; de Groot, N.; et al. PACES/HRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Recognition and Management of Arrhythmias in Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Developed in partnership between the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of PACES, HRS, the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS), and the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ISACHD). Heart Rhythm. 2014, 11, e102–e165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Stout, K.K.; Daniels, C.J.; Aboulhosn, J.A.; Bozkurt, B.; Broberg, C.S.; Colman, J.M.; Crumb, S.R.; Dearani, J.A.; Fuller, S.; Gurvitz, M.; et al. 2018 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 73, e81–e192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Varma, C.; Warr, M.R.; Hendler, A.L.; Paul, N.S.; Webb, G.D.; Therrien, J. Prevalence of “silent” pulmonary emboli in adults after the Fontan operation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2003, 41, 2252–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Grewal, J.; Al Hussein, M.; Feldstein, J.; Kiess, M.; Ellis, J.; Human, D.; Leipsic, J. Evaluation of silent thrombus after the Fontan operation. Congenit. Heart Dis. 2013, 8, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Morgan, V.L.; Graham, T.P., Jr.; Roselli, R.J.; Lorenz, C.H. Alterations in pulmonary artery flow patterns and shear stress determined with three-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging in fontan patients. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1998, 116, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Egbe, A.C.; Connolly, H.M.; McLeod, C.J.; Ammash, N.M.; Niaz, T.; Yogeswaran, V.; Poterucha, J.T.; Qureshi, M.Y.; Driscoll, D.J. Thrombotic and Embolic Complications Associated with Atrial Arrhythmia After Fontan Operation: Role of Prophylactic Therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 68, 1312–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sinning, C.; Zengin, E.; Blankenberg, S.; Rickers, C.; von Kodolitsch, Y.; Diller, G.; Kirchhof, P. Anticoagulation management in adult patients with congenital heart disease: A narrative review. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2021, 11, 1324–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jensen, A.; Idorn, L.; Nørager, B.; Vejlstrup, N.; Sondergaard, L. Anticoagulation in adults with congenital heart disease: The who, the when and the how? Heart 2015, 101, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier curve for survival from the thromboembolic event.
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier curve for survival from the thromboembolic event.
Jcm 12 03465 g001
Figure 2. Modification of thrombophylaxis in this study group during follow-up. NOAC: novel oral anticoagulants; VKA: vitamin K antagonist.
Figure 2. Modification of thrombophylaxis in this study group during follow-up. NOAC: novel oral anticoagulants; VKA: vitamin K antagonist.
Jcm 12 03465 g002
Table 1. Demographics and clinical characteristics of Fontan patients at enrolment.
Table 1. Demographics and clinical characteristics of Fontan patients at enrolment.
VariableFontan Patients
(n = 91)
Age at Fontan operation5.2 ± 3.9
Time between Fontan operation and enrollment22.1 ± 5.1
Pre-operative anatomy, n (%)
 VSD in single ventricle physiology51 (56.0)
 Transposition of great arteries40 (44.0)
 Hypoplasia of the right ventricle24 (26.4)
 Tricuspid atresia22 (24.2)
 Double-outlet right ventricle13 (14.3)
 Hypoplastic left heart syndrome13 (14.3)
Systemic ventricle type, n (%)
 Left59 (66.3)
 Right28 (31.5)
 Unidentified2 (2.3)
Type of Fontan, n (%)
 Lateral tunnel81 (89.0)
 Extracardiac conduct8 (8.8)
 Atrio-pulmonary connection2 (2.2)
Fenestration, n (%)41 (45.1)
NYHA functional class, n (%)
 I19 (20.9)
 II65 (71.4)
 III7 (7.7)
 IV0 (0)
Medication, n (%)
 Aspirin49 (53.8)
 MRA39 (42.9)
 Beta blockers26 (28.6)
 ACEI/ARB17 (18.7)
 VKA20 (22.1)
 Loop diuretics13 (14.3)
 NOAC10 (11.0)
 None12 (13.2)
Comorbidities, n (%)
 Hepatic34 (37.4)
 Thromboembolic24 (26.4)
 Thyroid19 (20.9)
Values are displayed as mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage). ACEI/ARB: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker; MRA: aldosterone receptor antagonists; NOAC: novel oral anticoagulants; NYHA: New York Heart Association; VKA: vitamin K antagonist; VSD: ventricular septal defect.
Table 2. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of Fontan patients in relation to thromboembolic complications.
Table 2. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of Fontan patients in relation to thromboembolic complications.
VariableFontan Patients
(n = 91)
Thromboembolic Complicationp-Value
No = 70Yes = 21
Age at enrollment (years)24.7 ± 6.124.4 ± 6.125.5 ± 6.30.464
Male, n (%)45 (49.5)35 (50.7)10 (47.6)0.667
BMI (kg/m2)22.6 ± 3.222.7 ± 3.322.3 ± 3.20.579
SaO2 (%)91.7 ± 5.092.6 ± 4.189.2 ± 6.50.005
Echocardiography
 SVEF (%)55.0 [50.0–60.0]55.0 [50.0–60.0]50.0 [45.0–55.0]0.077
 Visible fenestration, n (%)32 (35.2)22 (31.4)10 (47.6)0.246
 Atrioventricular valve regurgitation, n (%)
  mild41 (45.1)32 (45.7)9 (42.9)0.654
  moderate27 (29.7)21 (30.0)6 (28.6)0.777
  severe2 (2.2)2 (2.9)0 (0)0.419
Elastography
 Liver stiffens (kPa)9.2 [7.8–10.3]9.2 [7.9–10.3]8.9 [7.8–9.9]0.841
  F1, n (%)1 (1.1)1 (1.4)0 (0)0.570
  F2, n (%)30 (33.0)22 (31.4)8 (38.1)0.697
  F3, n (%)10 (11.0)7 (10.0)3 (14.3)0.648
  F4, n (%)7 (7.7)5 (7.1)2 (9.5)0.777
VAST score (point)1.0 [0.0–2.0]1.0 [0.0–2.0]1.0 [0.0–2.0]0.782
 Varices, n (%)18 (19.8)9 (12.9)9 (42.9)0.004
 Ascites, n (%)6 (6.6)4 (5.7)2 (9.5)0.151
 Splenomegaly, n (%)40 (44.0)33 (47.1)7 (33.3)0.188
 Thrombocytopenia, <150 × 103/mm3, n (%)39 (42.9)33 (47.1)6 (28.6)0.090
Laboratory investigation
 RBC (106/mm3) 5.3 ± 0.65.3 ± 0.55.5 ± 0.80.054
 HBG (g/dL)14.6 ± 3.314.3 ± 3.315.5 ± 3.10.131
 WBC (103/mm3)5.9 ± 2.16.0 ± 2.25.5 ± 1.80.335
 PLT (103/mm3)161.0 [124.5–203.5]151.0 [123.0–203.0]177.5 [149.5–210.3]0.319
 TC (μmol/L)3.7 ± 0.83.7 ± 0.83.5 ± 0.70.276
 TG (μmol/L)0.9 ± 0.40.8 ± 0.41.0 ± 0.40.127
 LDL cholesterol (μmol/L)2.3 ± 0.72.3 ± 0.72.1 ± 0.70.250
 CRP (mg/L)1.0 [0.7–2.3]1.4 [0.7–2.3]1.1 [0.8–2.2]0.471
 Creatinine (μmol/L)72.0 [64.0–82.0]72.0 [64.0–82.0]72.0 [65.5–82.3]0.831
 ALT (U/L)25.0 [19.5–32.0]27.0 [21.0–32.0]20.0 [18.3–25.8]0.098
 AST (U/L)25.0 [22.0–29.5]27.0 [22.0–30.0]23.5 [20.3–28.3]0.117
 Albumin (g/L)42.5 [40.4–44.5]42.6 [40.4–44.7]42.3 [39.9–43.2]0.847
 Total bilirubin (μmol/L)16.1 [11.0–24.0]16.5 [10.8–24.4]15.8 [14.4–20.5]0.634
 GGTP (U/L)59.0 [39.0–115.0]59.0 [39.5–115.0]45.0 [40.8–68.3]0.587
 aFP (ng/mL)3.3 ± 2.33.2 ± 2.12.1 [1.8–3.3]0.727
 APRI0.5 ± 0.30.5 ± 0.30.4 ± 0.10.281
 INR1.4 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.31.5 ± 0.20.105
 PT (s)16.1 ± 2.815.7 ± 3.017.0 ± 2.10.103
 D-dimer (μg/L)246.0 [170.0–398.0]247.0 [170.0–361.0]173.0 [170.0–421.8]0.895
 Endothelin (pg/mL)2.5 ± 1.32.4 ± 0.73.0 ± 2.40.088
Liver-derived hemostatic factors
 FV (%)57.0 [41.3–74.8]62.0 [42.5–76.5]48.0 [41.5–55.5]0.027
 FVII (%)58.0 [49.3–69.0]58 [50.0–72.0]55.0 [42.5–65.0]0.022
 FVIII (%)89.0 [67.3–108.8]87.0 [67.5–109.0]94.0 [66.0–107.5]0.944
 FIX (%)87.0 [70.0–107.5]91.0 [78.0–111.0]69.0 [58.0–96.0]0.007
 FX (%)80.0 [64.8–91.0]83.0 [73.0–93.0]59.0 [50.0–77.5]<0.001
 Fibrinogen (g/dL)2.4 ± 0.52.4 ± 0.62.5 ± 0.50.370
 Antithrombin (%)94.0 [88.0–100.0]94.5 [91.0–100.0]87.5 [83.5–92.8]0.059
 Protein S (%)87.0 [74.3–96.0]90.0 [80.0–99.0]69.0 [60.0–87.0]0.059
 Protein C (%)96.0 [82.3–109.5]96.0 [85.5–111.5]80.0 [70.0–103.5]0.007
 TAFI activity (%)93.0 [81.2–101.6]94.7 [84.6–101.7]83.7 [75.9–91.6]0.011
 TAFI antigen (%)85.0 [72.6–99.0]86.6 [75.6–100.5]78.1 [65.9–92.9]0.281
Endothelium-derived hemostatic factors
 tPA (ng/mL)6.0 [4.1–7.4]5.5 [3.9–7.2]6.6 [4.6–9.3]0.256
 PAI-1 (ng/mL)10.0 [7.4–15.2]9.9 [7.2–14.5]12.5 [8.6–16.6]0.868
 vWF activity (%)98.0 [85.3–125.6]95.8 [82.9–125.4]114.1 [94.8–135.5]0.029
 vWF antigen (%)140.0 [120.3–170.7]138.0 [119.1–166.5]144.4 [133.1–192.1]0.123
Values are displayed as mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage). aFP: alpha fetoprotein; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; APRI: aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; BMI: body mass index; CRP: C-reactive protein; F: factor; GGTP: gamma-glutamyltransferase; INR: international normalized ratio; LDL: low-density lipoprotein; PAI-1: plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; PLT: platelets; RBC: red blood cells; PT: prothrombotic time; SaO2: oxygen saturation; SVEF: single ventricular ejection fraction; TAFI: thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; tPA: tissue plasminogen activator; vWF: von Willebrand Factor; WBC: white blood cells.
Table 3. Baseline thromboembolic events profile of Fontan patients.
Table 3. Baseline thromboembolic events profile of Fontan patients.
Thromboembolic EventFontan Patients,
n (%)
Time from Procedure
(Years)
Fenestration,
n (%)
SV Type Left,
n (%)
SVT,
n (%)
PE12 (13.2)19.3 ± 4.9 [17.0–20.0]6 (50.0)8 (66.7)3 (25.0)
IS/TIA4 (4.4)14.0 ± 5.2 [10.0–18.0]3 (75.0)4 (100.0)2 (50.0)
FCT6 (6.6)18.2 ± 4.1 (16.0–20.0)2 (33.3)4 (66.7)3 (50.0)
DVT1 (1.1)-1 (100.0)1 (100.0)1 (100.0)
PST1 (1.1)-1 (100.0)1 (100.0)1 (100.0)
All events24 (26.4)17.8 ± 5.2 [16.0–19.5]12 (57.1)15 (71.4)9 (37.5)
Values are displayed as mean ± standard deviation, number (percentage), or median (interquartile range). DVT: deep venous thrombosis; FCT: Fontan circuit thrombus; IS: ischemic stroke; PE: pulmonary embolism; PST: peripheral systemic thrombosis SV: systemic ventricle; SVT: supraventricular tachycardia; TIA: transient ischemic attack.
Table 4. Thromboembolic events profile of Fontan patients during follow-up.
Table 4. Thromboembolic events profile of Fontan patients during follow-up.
NoTime from Procedure
(Years)
TE TypeHistory of Previous TE EventSV TypeFenestrationAntithrombotic TherapyCHA2DS2-VASc
(Points)
SVT (n)
122PE-undefinedyesAspirin01
214PE-LnoAspirin00
323PE + DVT-RnoAspirin21
415PEFCTRnoVKA01
533DVTPELnoNOAC20
625FCT + DVT-Lno-00
723PEPE + ISLnoNOAC30
Values are displayed as mean ± standard deviation. DTV: deep vein thrombosis; FCT: Fontan circuit thrombus; IS: ischemic stroke; L: left; NOAC: novel oral anticoagulants; PE: pulmonary embolism; R: right; SV: systemic ventricle; SVT: supraventricular tachycardia; TE: thromboembolic; VKA: vitamin K antagonist.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skubera, M.; Gołąb, A.; Sternalski, T.; Trojnarska, O.; Plicner, D.; Smaś-Suska, M.; Mazurek-Kula, A.; Bartczak-Rutkowska, A.; Pająk, J.; Podolec, P.; et al. Thromboembolic Complications in Adult Patients Following Fontan Procedure—A Multicenter Study. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103465

AMA Style

Skubera M, Gołąb A, Sternalski T, Trojnarska O, Plicner D, Smaś-Suska M, Mazurek-Kula A, Bartczak-Rutkowska A, Pająk J, Podolec P, et al. Thromboembolic Complications in Adult Patients Following Fontan Procedure—A Multicenter Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(10):3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103465

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skubera, Maciej, Aleksandra Gołąb, Tomasz Sternalski, Olga Trojnarska, Dariusz Plicner, Monika Smaś-Suska, Anna Mazurek-Kula, Agnieszka Bartczak-Rutkowska, Jacek Pająk, Piotr Podolec, and et al. 2023. "Thromboembolic Complications in Adult Patients Following Fontan Procedure—A Multicenter Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 10: 3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103465

APA Style

Skubera, M., Gołąb, A., Sternalski, T., Trojnarska, O., Plicner, D., Smaś-Suska, M., Mazurek-Kula, A., Bartczak-Rutkowska, A., Pająk, J., Podolec, P., & Tomkiewicz-Pająk, L. (2023). Thromboembolic Complications in Adult Patients Following Fontan Procedure—A Multicenter Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(10), 3465. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12103465

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop