Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cesarean Scar Defect Repair: Retrospective and Observational Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Martin, J.A.; Hamilton, B.E.; Osterman, M.J.; Curtin, S.C.; Matthews, T.J. Births: Final data for 2013. Natl. Vital. Stat. Rep. 2015, 64, 1–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Hoffmann, E.; Vahanian, S.; Martinelli, V.T.; Chavez, M.; Mesbah, M.; Nezhat, F.R. Combined Medical and Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgical Approach to the Treatment and Repair of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies. JSLS 2021, 25, e2021.00039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Donnez, O.; Donnez, J.; Orellana, R.; Dolmans, M.M. Gynecological and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic repair of a cesarean scar defect in a series of 38 women. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 107, 289–296.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Setubal, A.; Alves, J.; Osorio, F.; Guerra, A.; Fernandes, R.; Albornoz, J.; Sidiroupoulou, Z. Treatment for Uterine Isthmocele, A Pouchlike Defect at the Site of a Cesarean Section Scar. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2018, 25, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nezhat, C.; Falik, R.; Li, A. Surgical management of niche, isthmocele, uteroperitoneal fistula, or cesarean scar defect: A critical rebirth in the medical literature. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 107, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nezhat, C.G.L.; Soliemannjad, R.; Meshkat Razavi, G.; Nezhat, A. Cesarean scar defect: What is it and how should it be treated? OBG Manag. 2016, 28, 32–53. [Google Scholar]
- Antila-Langsjo, R.M.; Maenpaa, J.U.; Huhtala, H.S.; Tomas, E.I.; Staff, S.M. Cesarean scar defect: A prospective study on risk factors. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 219, 458.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dodd, J.M.; Anderson, E.R.; Gates, S.; Grivell, R.M. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, CD004732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raimondo, G.; Grifone, G.; Raimondo, D.; Seracchioli, R.; Scambia, G.; Masciullo, V. Hysteroscopic treatment of symptomatic cesarean-induced isthmocele: A prospective study. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2015, 22, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Voet, L.F.; Bij de Vaate, A.M.; Veersema, S.; Brolmann, H.A.; Huirne, J.A. Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: A prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 121, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bij de Vaate, A.J.; Brolmann, H.A.; van der Voet, L.F.; van der Slikke, J.W.; Veersema, S.; Huirne, J.A. Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: Relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 37, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Osser, O.V.; Jokubkiene, L.; Valentin, L. Cesarean section scar defects: Agreement between transvaginal sonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 35, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Osser, O.V.; Jokubkiene, L.; Valentin, L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 34, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Regnard, C.; Nosbusch, M.; Fellemans, C.; Benali, N.; van Rysselberghe, M.; Barlow, P.; Rozenberg, S. Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004, 23, 289–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Armstrong, V.; Hansen, W.F.; Van Voorhis, B.J.; Syrop, C.H. Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 101, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Nezhat, C.; Grace, L.A.; Razavi, G.M.; Mihailide, C.; Bamford, H. Reverse Vesicouterine Fold Dissection for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy After Prior Cesarean Deliveries. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 128, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College) and the Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine; Caughey, A.B.; Cahill, A.G.; Guise, J.M.; Rouse, D.J. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 210, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tower, A.M.; Frishman, G.N. Cesarean scar defects: An underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2013, 20, 562–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poidevin, L.O. The value of hysterography in the prediction of cesarean section wound defects. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1961, 81, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanimura, S.; Funamoto, H.; Hosono, T.; Shitano, Y.; Nakashima, M.; Ametani, Y.; Nakano, T. New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: Endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2015, 41, 1363–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, C.B.; Chiu, W.W.; Lee, C.Y.; Sun, Y.L.; Lin, Y.H.; Tseng, C.J. Cesarean scar defect: Correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 34, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van der Voet, L.F.; Vervoort, A.J.; Veersema, S.; BijdeVaate, A.J.; Brolmann, H.A.; Huirne, J.A. Minimally invasive therapy for gynaecological symptoms related to a niche in the caesarean scar: A systematic review. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014, 121, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vervoort, A.J.; Van der Voet, L.F.; Witmer, M.; Thurkow, A.L.; Radder, C.M.; van Kesteren, P.J.; Quartero, H.W.; Kuchenbecker, W.K.; Bongers, M.Y.; Geomini, P.M.; et al. The HysNiche trial: Hysteroscopic resection of uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in patients with abnormal bleeding, a randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health 2015, 15, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bujold, E.; Goyet, M.; Marcoux, S.; Brassard, N.; Cormier, B.; Hamilton, E.; Abdous, B.; Sidi, E.A.L.; Kinch, R.; Miner, L.; et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 116, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roberge, S.; Chaillet, N.; Boutin, A.; Moore, L.; Jastrow, N.; Brassard, N.; Gauthier, R.J.; Hudic, I.; Shipp, T.D.; Weimar, C.H.; et al. Single-versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2011, 115, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bij de Vaate, A.J.; van der Voet, L.F.; Naji, O.; Witmer, M.; Veersema, S.; Brolmann, H.A.; Bourne, T.; Huirne, J.A. Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: Systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 43, 372–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gubbini, G.; Centini, G.; Nascetti, D.; Marra, E.; Moncini, I.; Bruni, L.; Petraglia, F.; Florio, P. Surgical hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean-induced isthmocele in restoring fertility: Prospective study. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2011, 18, 234–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vikhareva Osser, O.; Valentin, L. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010, 117, 1119–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marotta, M.L.; Donnez, J.; Squifflet, J.; Jadoul, P.; Darii, N.; Donnez, O. Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defects diagnosed in nonpregnant women. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2013, 20, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tulandi, T.; Cohen, A. Emerging Manifestations of Cesarean Scar Defect in Reproductive-aged Women. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016, 23, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Api, M.; Boza, A.; Gorgen, H.; Api, O. Should Cesarean Scar Defect Be Treated Laparoscopically? A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2015, 22, 1145–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grace, L.; Nezhat, A. Should Cesarean Scar Defect Be Treated Laparoscopically? A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2016, 23, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gubbini, G.; Casadio, P.; Marra, E. Resectoscopic correction of the "isthmocele" in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2008, 15, 172–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nezhat, C.; Li, A.; Abed, S.; Balassiano, E.; Soliemannjad, R.; Nezhat, A.; Nezhat, C.H.; Nezhat, F. Strong Association Between Endometriosis and Symptomatic Leiomyomas. JSLS J. Soc. Laparoendosc. Surg. 2016, 20, e2016.00053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Jacobson, M.T.; Osias, J.; Velasco, A.; Charles, R.; Nezhat, C. Laparoscopic repair of a uteroperitoneal fistula. JSLS J. Soc. Laparoendosc. Surg. 2003, 7, 367–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kok, N.; Wiersma, I.C.; Opmeer, B.C.; de Graaf, I.M.; Mol, B.W.; Pajkrt, E. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: A meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 42, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Characteristics | Total (n = 27) | Percent | |
---|---|---|---|
Age | ≤30 | 1 | 3.7% |
31–35 | 11 | 40.7% | |
>35 | 15 | 55.6% | |
Average BMI | 23.1 | ||
Previous LSC with TOE | 11 | 40% | |
Primary Chief Complaint | Pain | 10 | 37% |
Irregular bleeding or spotting | 2 | 7% | |
Infertility | 4 | 14% | |
Pain and bleeding | 7 | 26% | |
Pain and infertility | 3 | 11% | |
Irregular bleeding and infertility | 1 | 3% | |
Pre-operative IVF attempts | 9/17 | 52% | |
Pre-operative IUI attempts | 8/17 | 29.6% | |
Parity | 1 | 20 | 74% |
≥2 | 7 | 26% | |
History of Smoking | 1 | 3.7% | |
History of Diabetes Mellitus | 2 | 7.4% | |
Symptoms | Irregular vaginal bleeding | 18 | 67% |
Pelvic pain | 22 | 81% | |
Urinary symptoms | 12 | 44% | |
Dysmenorrhea | 19 | 70% | |
Existing Conditions | Infertility < 1 year | 2 | 7% |
Infertility ≥ 1 year | 11 | 41% | |
Previous surgical diagnosis of endometriosis | 12 | 44% | |
Modality of Diagnosing Niche | Sonogram | 19 | 70% |
Sonohysterogram | 3 | 11% | |
MRI | 1 | 3.7% | |
Not diagnosed | 4 | 15.3% | |
Surgical Approach of Repair | Hysteroscopy only | 1 | 3.7% |
Laparoscopy and hysteroscopy | 23 | 85.2% | |
Hysterectomy | 3 | 11.1% | |
Number of Cesarean Deliveries | 1 | 20 | 74% |
≥2 | 7 | 26% |
Outcomes | Total (n = 27) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Symptoms | Persist | 1 | 3.7% |
Improve | 11 | 40.7% | |
Resolved | 15 | 55.6% | |
Pregnancy Rate * | 11/15 | 73.3% | |
Live Birth Rate * | 9/15 | 60% | |
Delivery Route | Vaginal Birth After Cesarean | 1 | 6.6% |
Repeat Cesarean Delivery | 8 | 53.3% | |
Number of Spontaneous Miscarriages | 2 | 13.3% | |
Post-Operative Complications | Umbilical Hernia | 1 | 3.7% |
Umbilical Infection | 1 | 3.7% | |
Uterine rupture | 0 | ||
Cesarean scar pregnancy | 0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nezhat, C.; Zaghi, B.; Baek, K.; Nezhat, A.; Nezhat, F.; Lindheim, S.; Nezhat, C. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cesarean Scar Defect Repair: Retrospective and Observational Study. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113720
Nezhat C, Zaghi B, Baek K, Nezhat A, Nezhat F, Lindheim S, Nezhat C. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cesarean Scar Defect Repair: Retrospective and Observational Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(11):3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113720
Chicago/Turabian StyleNezhat, Camran, Benjamin Zaghi, Kelly Baek, Azadeh Nezhat, Farr Nezhat, Steven Lindheim, and Ceana Nezhat. 2023. "Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cesarean Scar Defect Repair: Retrospective and Observational Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 11: 3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113720
APA StyleNezhat, C., Zaghi, B., Baek, K., Nezhat, A., Nezhat, F., Lindheim, S., & Nezhat, C. (2023). Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cesarean Scar Defect Repair: Retrospective and Observational Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(11), 3720. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113720