Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 in Patients with Pre-Existing Interstitial Lung Disease: Potential Value of a Steroid-Based Treatment Strategy
Previous Article in Journal
De Novo Lipogenesis-Related Monounsaturated Fatty Acids in the Blood Are Associated with Cardiovascular Risk Factors in HFpEF Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Etiology, Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes in Infective Endocarditis Patients Requiring Cardiac Surgery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: “Current Trends and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis”

by
Petros Ioannou
1,2,* and
Diamantis P. Kofteridis
1,2
1
School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
2
Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(15), 4935; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12154935
Submission received: 14 July 2023 / Accepted: 21 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis)
Infective endocarditis (IE) is an infectious disease involving the endothelium of the heart and, more commonly, the cardiac valves and prosthetic material (such as pacemakers and implantable defibrillators), and carries high morbidity and mortality rates [1,2]. Its epidemiology and microbiology change over time [3,4]. More specifically, the age of diagnosis and the rate of prosthetic material infection are increasing. Moreover, microbiological changes that occur with an increasing rate of enterococcal IE could be associated with the increasing age of patients [3,5]. This Special Issue of the Journal of Clinical Medicine (JCM) focuses on recent clinical research on IE.
In an original article by Meidrops et al., the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with IE requiring cardiac surgery were described [6]. More specifically, the study included 144 adult patients with IE due to S. aureus, Streptococcus spp., E. faecalis, or coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and an indication for cardiac surgery. S. aureus, was the causative agent of IE in 30.6% of cases, Streptococcus spp. in 24.3%, E. faecalis in 22.9%, and coagulase-negative staphylococci in 22.2%. The presence of a bicuspid aortic valve was the most common predisposing factor and was noted in 23.5% of patients, while intravenous drug use was noted in 11.8% of patients. In-hospital mortality was similar between all of the pathogens; however, patients with IE due to S. aureus had worse long-term prognoses. Moreover, IE due to S. aureus was associated with higher rates of embolic phenomena. IE due to CoNS was more frequent in cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis, and was also associated with more frequent perivalvular complications.
In patients who present with bloodstream infections (BSI), empirical therapy and the prompt provision of effective treatment are of utmost importance. In their original article, Schumann et al. evaluated the impact of additional FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification Panel (FA BCID 1.0) analysis on the time to optimal antimicrobial treatment, the duration of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), mortality in the ICU, and the reduction in procalcitonin (PCT) in the ICU of a German tertiary hospital [7]. The FA BCID is able to detect 24 bacterial and fungal microorganisms and three resistance genes in positive blood cultures in 70 min. In total, 179 patients with 200 BSI episodes were enrolled in the prospective-intervention group, while 150 patients with 170 BSI episodes were included in the retrospective control group. In the intervention group, BSI data were evaluated via matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and FA BCID from January 2019 to August 2020, while the data from the control group were retrospectively derived from MALDI-TOF results from 2018. Effective and appropriate antimicrobial treatment was provided earlier in the intervention group, with a median reduction of 17 h compared to the control group. Moreover, necessary changes in the antimicrobial treatment of patients in the intervention group were made a median of 24 h earlier compared to the control group. The length of stay in the ICU, the reduction in PCT levels, and the duration of mechanical ventilation were not significantly different among the two groups. Mortality was similar in both patient groups. These results imply that the implementation of FA BCID can help enable earlier antimicrobial treatment in patients with BSI by providing rapid and accurate microbiologic results and information regarding markers of antimicrobial resistance.
In recent years, the antimicrobial treatment of IE has changed according to the guidelines [8]. Importantly, the treatment of Enterococcus faecalis IE has changed due to the introduction of treatment with a combination with ampicillin and ceftriaxone instead of ampicillin and gentamicin [9]. Marino et al. address the issue of adverse events associated with aminoglycosides (namely their ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity), review preclinical evidence for dual beta-lactam therapy, and review data from clinical studies that provide information on dual beta-lactam therapy in patients with IE due to E. faecalis [10]. The fact that the success and mortality rates of dual beta-lactam therapy are similar to those of treatment with gentamicin, along with a lower rate of serious adverse events and a lack of need to measure serum drug levels, makes dual beta-lactam treatment a promising option for patients with IE due to E. faecalis.
Patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation may, on rare occasions, develop IE, which may exhibit unique characteristics due to the extensive exposure of these patients to healthcare systems, and due to their immunocompromised status. In their systematic review, Ioannou et al. that aimed to systematically review all published cases of IE in patients with liver transplantation and describe their epidemiology, microbiology, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched until January 2021 for studies that provided such information [11]. In total, 39 studies containing the data of 62 patients were included in their analysis. The most commonly isolated pathogens were Gram-positive microorganisms (69.4%), fungi (25.8%), and Gram-negative microorganisms (9.7%). In 9.3% of cases, IE was culture-negative. The most commonly infected valve was the aortic valve, followed by the mitral, tricuspid, and pulmonary valves. The most commonly used antimicrobials were aminoglycosides, vancomycin, and aminopenicillins, and surgical management was performed in about 50% of patients. A total of 57.4% of the patients were cured, and the overall mortality was 43.5%.
The same research group, in another systematic review, aimed to systematically review all published cases of IE due to Moraxella catarrhalis, the most clinically relevant species among Moraxella spp. [12]. In a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library (through to 8 December 2021), 27 studies that contained epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological data, as well as treatment data and the outcomes of 31 patients with IE due to Moraxella spp., were included. A prosthetic valve was present in 25.8% of cases, and the mitral valve was the most commonly infected intracardiac site. The most commonly seen clinical phenomena were fever, sepsis, and embolic phenomena. The treatments most commonly included cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, aminopenicillins, and penicillin, and the overall mortality was 12.9%.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This Special Issue presents several interesting papers that will improve the current understanding of this infection and help clinicians in their decision making. I am thankful to the reviewers for providing high-quality feedback on the submitted manuscript and to the JCM team for their support with this Special Issue. Finally, I would like to thank the authors of the published manuscripts for their valuable contributions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baddour, L.M.; Wilson, W.R.; Bayer, A.S.; Fowler, V.G.; Tleyjeh, I.M.; Rybak, M.J.; Barsic, B.; Lockhart, P.B.; Gewitz, M.H.; Levison, M.E.; et al. Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015, 132, 1435–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, A.; Gaca, J.G.; Chu, V.H. Management Considerations in Infective Endocarditis: A Review. JAMA 2018, 320, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ambrosioni, J.; Hernandez-Meneses, M.; Téllez, A.; Pericàs, J.; Falces, C.; Tolosana, J.M.; Vidal, B.; Almela, M.; Quintana, E.; Llopis, J.; et al. The Changing Epidemiology of Infective Endocarditis in the Twenty-First Century. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2017, 19, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gupta, R.; Kaushal, V.; Goyal, A.; Kumar, P.; Gupta, D.; Tandon, R.; Mahajan, A.; Singla, S.; Singh, G.; Singh, B.; et al. Changing Microbiological Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of the Isolates Obtained from Patients with Infective Endocarditis—The Time to Relook into the Therapeutic Guidelines. Indian Heart J. 2021, 73, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Slipczuk, L.; Codolosa, J.N.; Davila, C.D.; Romero-Corral, A.; Yun, J.; Pressman, G.S.; Figueredo, V.M. Infective Endocarditis Epidemiology over Five Decades: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meidrops, K.; Burkhardt, F.J.; Osipovs, J.D.; Petrosina, E.; Groma, V.; Stradins, P. Etiology, Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes in Infective Endocarditis Patients Requiring Cardiac Surgery. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Schumann, J.; Johanns, U.; Ahmad-Nejad, P.; Ghebremedhin, B.; Woebker, G. The Impact of the FilmArray-Based Detection of Microbial Pathogens from Positive Blood Culture Vials on the Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Regimen in Intensive Care Units of the Helios University Clinic Wuppertal, Germany. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Habib, G.; Lancellotti, P.; Antunes, M.J.; Bongiorni, M.G.; Casalta, J.-P.; Del Zotti, F.; Dulgheru, R.; El Khoury, G.; Erba, P.A.; Iung, B.; et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Infective Endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 3075–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fernández-Hidalgo, N.; Almirante, B.; Gavaldà, J.; Gurgui, M.; Peña, C.; de Alarcón, A.; Ruiz, J.; Vilacosta, I.; Montejo, M.; Vallejo, N.; et al. Ampicillin plus Ceftriaxone Is as Effective as Ampicillin plus Gentamicin for Treating Enterococcus Faecalis Infective Endocarditis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 56, 1261–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Marino, A.; Munafò, A.; Zagami, A.; Ceccarelli, M.; Di Mauro, R.; Cantarella, G.; Bernardini, R.; Nunnari, G.; Cacopardo, B. Ampicillin Plus Ceftriaxone Regimen against Enterococcus Faecalis Endocarditis: A Literature Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Ioannou, P.; Alexakis, K.; Kofteridis, D.P. Endocarditis in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ioannou, P.; Alexakis, K.; Baliou, S.; Kofteridis, D.P. Infective Endocarditis by Moraxella Species: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ioannou, P.; Kofteridis, D.P. Special Issue: “Current Trends and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis”. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4935. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12154935

AMA Style

Ioannou P, Kofteridis DP. Special Issue: “Current Trends and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis”. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(15):4935. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12154935

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ioannou, Petros, and Diamantis P. Kofteridis. 2023. "Special Issue: “Current Trends and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis”" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 15: 4935. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12154935

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop