Next Article in Journal
How to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy. Comment on Katz et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Tachycardia-Induced Cardiomyopathy Compared with Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1412
Previous Article in Journal
PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors as Monotherapy in the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with High PD-L1 Expression: An Expert Position Statement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator-Related Culture-Negative Infection: A Case of Coxiella burnetii Infection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Infective Endocarditis: What Is New in the Clinical Research?”

1
School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
2
Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital of Heraklion, 71110 Heraklion, Greece
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(15), 5064; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155064
Submission received: 7 July 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published: 1 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Infective Endocarditis: What Is New in the Clinical Research?)
Infective Endocarditis (IE) is a disease that carries high morbidity and mortality risks and involves the infection of the endocardium, and more commonly of the cardiac valves and prosthetic material, like implantable defibrillators or pacemakers [1,2]. The epidemiological characteristics and the microbiology of this disease have changed considerably during the last decades [3,4]. This has led to a significant revision of the diagnostic criteria, which has led to increased sensitivity for the diagnosis of IE to allow the implementation of the changing profile of the disease, as well as the implementation of newer methods such as positron emission tomography or next-generation metagenomic sequencing [5,6,7]. Thus, ongoing clinical research on IE is critical to allow the timely identification of changes in epidemiology and microbiology. This Special Issue of the Journal of Clinical Medicine (JCM) aimed to collect high-quality scientific contributions on the topic of clinical research in IE.
In their original study, Asai et al. tried to clarify whether there is a difference among the profiles and clinical outcomes of patients who are eligible and those who are not eligible for enrollment in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) [8]. All patients in their hospital from 2007 to 2019 with a diagnosis of IE were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups, those who were eligible for enrollment in an RCT (the RCT-appropriate group) and those who were not (the RCT-inappropriate group), based on exclusion criteria determined from previously published clinical trials. In total, 66 patients with a median age of 70 years were enrolled in the study, and 70% were male. The RCT-inappropriate group consisted of 74% of the patients. Patients in the RCT-inappropriate group were older and had more comorbidities. Compared with the patients in the RCT-inappropriate group, those in the RCT-appropriate group had a milder form of the disease and also had significantly longer overall survival. Thus, this study suggests that there is a significant gap in the characteristics of patients and clinical outcomes between patients in RCTs and those who are not eligible for inclusion in RCT, implying that physicians should be aware that RCTs may not be completely representative of the real-world population.
Calderon-Parra et al. aimed to assess the risk of IE after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) compared with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) [9]. They prospectively followed a cohort of patients with TAVI/SAVR from March 2015 to December 2020, and performed a propensity-score-based analysis to include variables previously associated with TAVI/SAVR and IE. In total, 355 patients with SAVR and 278 patients with TAVI were included in the analysis. The median follow-up was similar between the two patient groups. IE occurred more frequently in patients with TAVI (4.65%) compared to patients with SAVR (1.41%). TAVI patients were more likely to have early IE compared to patients with SAVR. In the propensity score analysis, the risk for IE was similar. Younger age, complicated diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, advanced heart failure, and peripheral arteriopathy were factors associated with TAVI IE.
Mycoplasma hominis is a microorganism that may colonize the lower genital tract and may cause genital or neonatal infections [10]. Bustos-Merlo et al. present a case of M. hominis IE and review the literature about this rare clinical entity [11]. More specifically, a 67-year-old male farmer with a history of arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and asymptomatic hyperuricemia developed sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia secondary to structural heart disease and was treated with ablation and the placement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). He developed signs of sepsis in the context of an infection of the ICD generator pocket a few days later, and was admitted to the hospital. He then underwent cardiovascular surgery for the explantation of the ICD, pericardiocentesis, in which 900 cc of exudate fluid was aspirated, and debridement of the generator pocket. The fluid was positive for Mycoplasma spp. and SeptiFast (LightCycler® SeptiFast Test Mgrade; Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) was positive for M. hominis in a blood culture. Moreover, the pericardial fluid, the pocket wound exudate and the ICD lead were all positive for M. hominis. The patient was treated with antimicrobials, a new ICD was placed, and the patient remained well months after discharge. A review of the published cases revealed 11 cases of M. hominis IE, with 72.7% of patients being male, with a mean age of 45 years and a history of valve surgery in all patients. The diagnosis was performed by culture in 54.5% of cases or with the aid of molecular techniques in 45.5%. The prognosis was favorable in 72.7% of patients. The most commonly used antimicrobials were doxycycline, quinolones, and clindamycin.
Blood culture negative IE is commonly caused by Coxiella burnettii. In their study, Papakonstantinou et al. present a case of cardiac-implanted electronic device (CIED)-related blood-culture-negative IE that was caused by C. burnetii [12]. More specifically, a 54-year-old male with a previous implantation of an ICD three years before was admitted to the hospital due to low-grade fever, prolonged fatigue, and weight loss. The echocardiography showed a large echogenic mass on the ventricular pacing wire in the right ventricle. Repeated blood cultures were negative. Transvenous lead extraction was performed, while a surgical replacement of the tricuspid valve was carried out due to multiple vegetations on the tricuspid valve. Serology showed increased phase I and phase II IgG antibodies, leading to a definite diagnosis of CIED infection.
Pasteurella spp. are facultative anaerobic, Gram-negative coccobacilli that are commonly found in the oral cavity and the gastrointestinal tract of some animals. They are known to cause infections such as septicemia or, more commonly, skin and soft tissue infections in the context of an animal bite [13]. In their systematic review, Alifragki et al. aimed to systematically review all cases of IE caused by Pasteurella spp. in the literature [14]. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library through December 2021 led to the recovery of 28 studies, providing data on epidemiology and clinical and microbiological characteristics, as well as data from 28 patients on the treatment and outcomes of IE by Pasteurella spp. A prosthetic valve was present in 21.4% of patients. The most commonly involved intracardiac site was the aortic valve, while the most common clinical presentations were fever, sepsis, septic shock, and heart failure. The most commonly used antimicrobials were cephalosporins, aminopenicillins, and penicillin, and the overall mortality was 17.9%.
This Special Issue includes many interesting papers that will increase the reader’s understanding of IE. As a Guest Editor, I would like to thank all the authors for their contributions, the reviewers for providing high-quality feedback, and the JCM editorial team for their support and assistance with this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baddour, L.M.; Wilson, W.R.; Bayer, A.S.; Fowler, V.G.; Tleyjeh, I.M.; Rybak, M.J.; Barsic, B.; Lockhart, P.B.; Gewitz, M.H.; Levison, M.E.; et al. Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015, 132, 1435–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, A.; Gaca, J.G.; Chu, V.H. Management Considerations in Infective Endocarditis: A Review. JAMA 2018, 320, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ambrosioni, J.; Hernandez-Meneses, M.; Téllez, A.; Pericàs, J.; Falces, C.; Tolosana, J.M.; Vidal, B.; Almela, M.; Quintana, E.; Llopis, J.; et al. The Changing Epidemiology of Infective Endocarditis in the Twenty-First Century. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2017, 19, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gupta, R.; Kaushal, V.; Goyal, A.; Kumar, P.; Gupta, D.; Tandon, R.; Mahajan, A.; Singla, S.; Singh, G.; Singh, B.; et al. Changing Microbiological Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of the Isolates Obtained from Patients with Infective Endocarditis—The Time to Relook into the Therapeutic Guidelines. Indian Heart J. 2021, 73, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ten Hove, D.; Slart, R.H.J.A.; Sinha, B.; Glaudemans, A.W.J.M.; Budde, R.P.J. 18F-FDG PET/CT in Infective Endocarditis: Indications and Approaches for Standardization. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2021, 23, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Haddad, S.F.; DeSimone, D.C.; Chesdachai, S.; Gerberi, D.J.; Baddour, L.M. Utility of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Fowler, V.G.; Durack, D.T.; Selton-Suty, C.; Athan, E.; Bayer, A.S.; Chamis, A.L.; Dahl, A.; DiBernardo, L.; Durante-Mangoni, E.; Duval, X.; et al. The 2023 Duke-ISCVID Criteria for Infective Endocarditis: Updating the Modified Duke Criteria. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2023, ciad271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Asai, N.; Shibata, Y.; Hirai, J.; Ohashi, W.; Sakanashi, D.; Kato, H.; Hagihara, M.; Suematsu, H.; Mikamo, H. A Gap of Patients with Infective Endocarditis between Clinical Trials and the Real World. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Calderón-Parra, J.; de Villarreal-Soto, J.E.; Oteo-Domínguez, J.F.; Mateos-Seirul, M.; Ríos-Rosado, E.; Dorado, L.; Vera-Puente, B.; Arellano-Serrano, C.; Ramos-Martínez, A.; Forteza-Gil, A. Risk of Infective Endocarditis Associated with Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score-Based Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ahmed, J.; Rawre, J.; Dhawan, N.; Khanna, N.; Dhawan, B. Mycoplasma Hominis: An under Recognized Pathogen. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2021, 39, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bustos-Merlo, A.; Rosales-Castillo, A.; Cobo, F.; Hidalgo-Tenorio, C. Blood Culture-Negative Infective Endocarditis by Mycoplasma Hominis: Case Report and Literature Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Papakonstantinou, P.E.; Georgiadou, V.; Doumanis, G.; Bistola, V.; Papaparaskevas, J.; Filippatos, G.; Xydonas, S. Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator-Related Culture-Negative Infection: A Case of Coxiella Burnetii Infection. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bennett, J.E.; Dolin, R.; Blaser, M.J. (Eds.) Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 9th ed.; Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2020; ISBN 978-0-323-48255-4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Alifragki, A.; Kontogianni, A.; Protopapa, I.; Baliou, S.; Ioannou, P. Infective Endocarditis by Pasteurella Species: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ioannou, P. Special Issue “Infective Endocarditis: What Is New in the Clinical Research?”. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5064. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155064

AMA Style

Ioannou P. Special Issue “Infective Endocarditis: What Is New in the Clinical Research?”. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(15):5064. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ioannou, Petros. 2023. "Special Issue “Infective Endocarditis: What Is New in the Clinical Research?”" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 15: 5064. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155064

APA Style

Ioannou, P. (2023). Special Issue “Infective Endocarditis: What Is New in the Clinical Research?”. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(15), 5064. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155064

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop