Next Article in Journal
Factors Associating with Non-Dipping Pattern of Nocturnal Blood Pressure in Patients with Essential Hypertension
Next Article in Special Issue
Sialendoscopy-Based Analysis of Submandibular Duct Papillae with a Proposal for Classification
Previous Article in Journal
Recurrence and Mortality Risks in Patients with First Incident Acute Stroke or Myocardial Infarction: A Longitudinal Study Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service Database
Previous Article in Special Issue
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Differentiation between the Most Common Benign Parotid Gland Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Impact of Tissue Preparation on Salivary Gland Tumors Investigated by Fourier-Transform Infrared Microspectroscopy

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(2), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020569
by Mona Stefanakis 1,2,†, Miriam C. Bassler 1,2,†, Tobias R. Walczuch 1, Elena Gerhard-Hartmann 3, Almoatazbellah Youssef 3, Agmal Scherzad 4, Manuel Bernd Stöth 4, Edwin Ostertag 1, Rudolf Hagen 4, Maria R. Steinke 5,6, Stephan Hackenberg 7, Marc Brecht 1,2,* and Till Jasper Meyer 4,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(2), 569; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020569
Submission received: 15 November 2022 / Revised: 10 December 2022 / Accepted: 9 January 2023 / Published: 10 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

To the Authors:

The manuscript represents a study of an infrared based tissue preparation in a limited salivary gland tumor subtype.

The following are the main issues:

1.      The rationale for utilizing this tissue preparation selectively in salivary gland tumor digitalization is unconvincing.  Except for applying this technique to a rare tumors, the concept is no difference from any tumors of different organs.

 

2.      Evidence that this technique is superior than traditional methods is lacking. In other words, how using it in salivary gland tumors different from any other tumors for diagnosis on H&E or biomarkers.

 

3.      The study is limited to pleomorphic adenoma and worthies’ tumor both are benign and molecular analysis are not needed for routine diagnostic purposes.

 

4.      No comparative biomarker analysis on different tissue preparations are done to demonstrate the superiority of this method.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for your time and effort. We appreciate your valuable suggestions to improve the quality of our contribution. You can find the changes in the attached file.

On behalf of the authors,

Mona Stefanakis

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Very well written manuscript about the bio informatics to diagnostics of salivary gland tumor assement at molecular level assessment but the relevance of this method towards warthin salivary gland tumor homogenesity and sensitivity  being rated high versus pleomorphic adenoma should have explained, is this a draw back to the present study protocol, can paraffin embedded previous stock saved blocks be utilised for the molecular assessment using FTIR could have been explained, the advantages versus disadvantages of the present protocol in comparison towards existing techniques would have added more significance to the study stressing the importance of molecular bond of tissue and fat which later may be adapted for image analysis using mri, nevertheless a good study.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for your time and effort. We appreciate your valuable suggestions to improve the quality of our contribution. You can find the changes in the attached file.

On behalf of the authors,

Mona Stefanakis

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The introduction precisely explains the bology and histopathology of the two salivary tumors and the method of histopathological examination using spectroscopy of four different material samples.

Material and method properly designed and clearly presented results. Unfortunately, the results are not fully explained in the conclusion. we do not receive unequivocal conclusions and the authors state the need for further research.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much for your time and effort. We appreciate your valuable suggestions to improve the quality of our contribution. You can find the changes in the attached file.

On behalf of the authors,

Mona Stefanakis

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop