Next Article in Journal
In-Hospital Mortality from Spondylodiscitis: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection of GSTM1-null Genotype in Women Undergoing IVF Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Polypill Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Combination Medication Therapy for Hypertension Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
Combined Hormonal Contraception during Breastfeeding—A Survey of Physician’s Recommendations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Obstructed Hemivagina with Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis: A Challenging Case Report and a Management Flow Chart

by
Ewelina Malanowska-Jarema
1,
Andrzej Starczewski
1,
Yana Osnytska
1,*,
Mariola Krzyścin
2,
Elżbieta Sowińska-Przepiera
2,
Matteo Balzarro
3 and
Emanuele Rubilotta
3
1
Department of Gynecology, Endocrinology and Gynecologic Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
2
Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic and Internal Diseases, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
3
Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37100 Verona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7227; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237227
Submission received: 8 October 2023 / Revised: 2 November 2023 / Accepted: 6 November 2023 / Published: 22 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gynecologic and Obstetric Pathologies: From Birth to Menopause)

Abstract

:
We present here a case of complex uterine anomaly—obstructed hemivagina with ipsilateral renal agenesis (OHVIRA), also known as Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome in a 13-year-old girl with a history of recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI). In the emergency room, a trans-abdominal sonography revealed an ovarian cyst and renal agenesis, without any suspicion of vaginal obstruction. This led to a delay in the diagnosis of this uncommon anomaly. Finally, MRI findings confirmed the presence of OHVIRA syndrome. As the congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are present in almost one third of cases associated with genital malformations, urologists should carefully screen patients with rUTI. The patient underwent simultaneous laparoscopy and vaginoscopy, which was in our opinion the most appropriate therapeutic decision. In this article, we are also going to discuss the role of laparoscopy in the management of OHVIRA syndrome, as well as other surgical techniques described in the literature.

1. Introduction

Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are present in almost one third of cases associated with genital malformations [1,2]. The prevalence of CAKUT has a large range in the pediatric population (3.5% to 43%), and this cluster of disorders represents the most frequent cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in children [3]. Indeed, these disorders may predispose to recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI), resulting in kidney impairment [4]. Uterus didelphys with obstructed hemivagina (OHVIRA) may cause acute abdominal pain, rUTI, and this condition may be associated with CAKUT [5]. Therefore, OHVIRA should be considered in young females with these symptoms and CAKUT.
Currently, the management of OHVIRA is still debated. Although many ideas for OHVIRA management have been suggested, delayed diagnosis is still an obvious problem. In this article, we present a problem-solving flow chart and other methods that could help professionals in their practice. Several operative techniques for OHVIRA management have been reported, such as puncture of the vaginal wall, single-stage vaginoplasty, mini-laparotomy and even unilateral hysterectomy [6]. However, evidence regarding the most effective therapeutic option is scant. Moreover, some authors have also questioned the diagnostic role of laparoscopy, which is still under debate [7].
We report a case of a young woman with OHVIRA associated with CAKUT, the condition of rUTI and pain. This case emphasizes that uterus didelphys with obstructed hemivagina (OHVIRA) should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adolescent girls presenting with acute abdominal pain, rUTI and CAKUT. Furthermore, we reviewed the most used surgical procedures for these conditions.

2. Case Report

We report the case of a 13-year-old girl who presented with acute abdominal pain and a UTI. Hematuria was not present. The patient had a history of rUTIs that occurred six times in the last year, with urine cultures positive for more than 105 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of Escherichia coli (E. coli). The young woman complained of rUTI despite courses of antibiotics that had been administered (Cefuroxime 2 × 1500 mg iv.).
The patient attained menarche 6 months previously, reporting of back and lower abdominal pain and UTI; it was of 1 week’s duration. She had regular menstrual cycles, every 30 days, lasting 3 to 4 days.
Abdominal ultrasonography (US) (Figure 1) revealed the right renal agenesis and suspicion of a right-ovarian cyst. Due to elevated tumor markers (Ca-125/ROMA Index), the patient was referred to laparotomy. Urgent urological consultation excluded any urological cause and indicated a gynecological background of the symptoms. Sudden vaginal bleeding led to expanding investigations, and the patient was admitted by tertiary referral to hospital.
Particular image examination was performed at the Department of Gynecology, Endocrinology and Gynecologic Oncology of University hospital.
On admission, because of the patient’s severe pain, the examination was conducted under general anesthesia and the dorsal lithotomy position with a virgin-size speculum revealed a single normal vagina and one cervix. Bulging of the vaginal wall on the right side was also found. Unfortunately, the attempt to puncture the thick vaginal wall to relieve patient’s symptoms failed in providing drainage. MRI (Figure 2 and Figure 3) provided the correct diagnosis of both CAKUT and OHVIRA syndrome, and was crucial for the patient’s management and short- and long-term follow up. A rare congenital urogenital anomaly, uterus didelphys with obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis (OHVIRA), known in the literature as Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich (HWW) syndrome, was the final diagnosis.
According to the literature, we considered hemivaginal septal resection and anastomosis between the obstructed hemivagina and the normal vagina. However, escalating abdominal symptoms prompted us to perform laparoscopy simultaneously.

2.1. Family History

The medical, family, and psychosocial history of the patient, including genetic information, revealed no history of renal abnormalities.

2.2. Preoperative Management

Pre-operative management included psychological counselling of the patient and her family regarding treatment options, with detailed description of a planned surgical approach. Before completion of the whole examination, the patient was given an oral combined estrogen–progestin pill to block recurrent uterine blood flow, which could intensify abdominal symptoms.

2.3. Surgical Technique

The patient underwent combined laparoscopy and vaginoscopy. There was clinical evidence to suspect adnexal torsion and hematosalpinx, hence the laparoscopy was performed simultaneously. Vaginoscopy was completed, and with the help of a resectoscope, a vertical incision was created, the vaginal septum was excised and the vaginal opening was extended. Intraoperative abdominal sonography was done for the appropriate evaluation of the place of resection (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Combined surgery allowed abdominal cavity inspection and spontaneous drainage of hematosalpinx and hematometra was observed (Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10). An intravaginal catheter was placed for seven days to prevent early vaginal stenosis.

2.4. Follow-Up

The patient came for a health check after one week and was followed up for prevention of complications like vaginal stenosis and recurrence of obstruction. Hormonal therapy with combined estrogen–progesterone pills was administered to avoid heavy periods and possible inflammation which could accelerate the stenosis process. At 6 months follow up, the patient was free from vaginal stenosis, rUTI and recurrence of obstruction. We obtained written parental permission to present this case study.
Table 1 presents a management flow chart of patients with obstructed hemivagina with ipsilateral renal agenesis (OHVIRA).

3. Discussion

OHVIRA syndrome is a rare congenital urogenital anomaly derived from Mullerian tract abnormality [16]. The characteristic triad of this syndrome is didelphys uterus, obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis [16]. OHVIRA often is accompanied by other anatomical disorders like a longitudinal or transverse vaginal septum [17]. Also, renal agenesis, urinary retention or unexplained recurrent UTIs should always catch the surgeon’s attention for possible congenital anomalies. However, other accompanying renal anomalies, such as renal dysplasia, a double collecting system and ectopic ureter are possible; although, only a limited number of such cases have been reported [18,19]. Symptoms like acute abdominal pain, dysmenorrhea and urinary disorders can mislead clinicians to make an inaccurate diagnosis.
This case highlights the potential pitfalls and challenges in gynecologic surgery in adolescence. It also emphasizes that uterus didelphys with obstructed hemivagina (OHVIRA) should be considered in the differential diagnosis of adolescent girls presenting with acute abdominal pain, recurrent UTI and CAKUT [20,21]. We also aimed to highlight the crucial role of a detailed diagnostic process and correct management for future family planning in OHVIRA patients.
Sometimes, a condition misinterpreted as dysmenorrhea and normal menstrual blood flow through the unobstructed hemivagina can cause delay in reaching a correct diagnosis. Dysmenorrhea is reported by 30–90% of young female patients and “irregular menstrual bleeding” in up to 43% [22]. The presence of menarche does not mean that an anatomical problem does not exist. A comprehensive interview with regard to medical history is an important part of the diagnostic process. In the meantime, the first menstruation in our patient came from a healthy uterus, which misled the clinician to make a good diagnosis and excluded the anatomical cause of the symptoms.
Pelvic pain in adolescents is often a puzzle, and suspicion and knowledge about different causes are important for accurate diagnosis. As urogenital abnormalities are rare, they can be mistaken for ovarian cysts [23]. In our case, the second uterus was taken as an ovarian cyst, which prolonged the diagnosis.
Recurrent UTI can be associated with specific women’s anomalies, but if not treated properly it can lead to upper urinary tract infections like glomerulo- or pyelonephritis [2,3,4,24,25]. Therefore, urinary tract disorders are usually the first sign of unrecognized urogenital tract disorders.
Often forgotten, endometriosis in adolescence can provoke dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and, in consequence, develop endometrial cysts, which could imitate large abdominopelvic masses [26].
Such abnormalities like vaginal septum, urogenital sinus, rudimentary horn, and others should be in mind when counselling a female adolescent with nonspecific symptoms. The need for precise follow up is necessary in patients with CAKUT, and it must be noted that renal agenesis and other things could be associated with congenital anomalies of female reproductive organs [2].
MRI imaging is the gold standard for diagnosis with higher sensitivity in detecting the uterine morphology and the continuity of the vagina when compared to ultrasonography [6]. However, high cost and sometimes a long waiting time for the result, constitutes the limits of this investigation. In this case, abdominal sonography, which was thought to be suitable for virgins, misled the radiologist and the congenital abnormality was mistaken for an ovarian cyst. Urogenital anomalies may be overlooked, because of the rare prevalence of these conditions. Transrectal sonography is feasible when a transvaginal method cannot be performed; though it can be helpful, it is rarely accepted by young patients [26].
In the paediatric and adolescent population, scan techniques are essentially limited to a transabdominal or transperineal approach. Therefore, transperineal scanning could reveal a distended vagina and/or uterus filled with fluid containing low-level echoes [27]. Furthermore, in the evaluation of vaginal pathologies, the use of three-dimensional/four-dimensional ultrasound should be considered, given its high sensitivity and specificity [28].
Gynecologic surgeons face many challenges when considering complex gynecologic surgery, especially in children. Anticipating the intraoperative risks and a careful step by step, surgical plan should be an integral part of each procedure in children with congenital anomalies.
To date, several surgical techniques for OHVIRA management have been reported, such as puncture of the vaginal wall, single-stage vaginoplasty, mini-laparotomy, even unilateral hysterectomy and using a vaginal mold or stent [8,29]. Septum and vaginal trauma, which often occur because of using retractors, lead to searching for new methods that will allow them to reduce such complications. According to data, a new “No-touch” technique is safe and effective, provides good visualization and helps to protect the septum from trauma. Authors also reduce lower risk of vaginal stenosis, adhesions and postoperative pain [29]. Grünberger described a modification of the surgical approach, which is called Z-plasty [30]. Van Bijsterveldt et al. proposed a combined abdominal–vaginal method that can be used in patients with a higher risk of restenosis after surgery. Layperson modified previous author’s technique using a balloon catheter to provide traction for the vagina, which prevented vagina stenosis [31].
It is technically difficult to puncture the thick fibrotic tissue of the hemivaginal septum with a needle. Due to such a proceeding, we expose the patient to unnecessary interventions, like minilaparotomy. Therefore, we offered our patient intraoperative abdominal sonography to directly evaluate the accurate and safe place of puncture and septal resection.
Minimally invasive surgery has acquired more and more space in the surgical panorama. Furthermore, it has many advantages in adolescent gynecology. Some of the authors discussed the role of laparoscopy in the management of OHVIRA [18,32,33]. In our opinion, a concomitant laparoscopic approach allows us to particularly evaluate the smaller pelvis.
Hydrometrocopes and those associated with OHVIRA recurrent blood flow can develop hematosalpinx and, in consequence, endometriosis [34]. During laparoscopy we observed the drainage of hematosalpinx; therefore, the efficacy of our treatment was ‘under eye’ control. We have also found active endometriosis lesions, which confirmed that late recognition of OHVIRA can have serious consequences.
The necessity of the unilateral hysterectomy of one uterus is questionable. First of all, such a procedure is not a simple one for children. Another point is regarding the future family planning in patients with congenital anomalies.
In contrast to other authors, we believe that concomitant laparoscopic surgery is necessary in the surgical approach for OHVIRA patients [18,32], not only for clarification of the diagnosis, but also for the evaluation of pelvis anatomy and the potential consequences of unrecognized diseases like hematosalpinx and endometriosis. Perhaps, preoperative evolution of the Ca-125 marker indicates a possible development of early endometriosis. Furthermore, laparoscopic surgery allows intraoperative observation of drainage from the uterus and the efficacy of our treatment.
Because of the higher risk of vaginal restenosis in patients with OHVIRA syndrome, there is a strong need for long-distance follow up in such patients. Sometimes surgical resection is necessary. Early postoperative management with antibiotics and oral contraceptives is necessary to avoid vaginal infection and future restenosis.
Follow up of OHVIRA requires prolonged monitoring of solitary kidney function and guidance enabling satisfactory sexual intercourse and delivery. Girls with renal agenesis should be carefully monitored for possible genital tract anomalies, and, conversely, girls with vaginal or uterine anomalies should be monitored for renal malformations [35].
This study has some limitations. First, most reports related to OHVIRA comprise only individual cases, which are caused by the rarity of this disorder. Only some studies showed a larger number of cases. Also, some data from medical history was missing or the value of medical images was poor.
The purpose of this study was to outline the correct management pathway and surgical approach concerning OHVIRA, which could vary not only due to anatomical differences, but also due to medical advances and the possibility of delayed diagnosis.

4. Conclusions

OHVIRA conditions may be associated with rUTI and CAKUT. Our findings show, that a careful evaluation of the urinary tract should be recommended in all OHVIRA patients.
However, delayed diagnosis may result in late complications, including retrograde tubal reflux and endometriosis. Unrecognized and improperly treated congenital malformations of the vagina, cervix, and uterus, although rare, may have severe implications for future family planning in OHVIRA patients.
In our case, transperineal sonography turned out to be a helpful tool in the early diagnosis of OHVIRA. Combined management of laparoscopy and vaginoscopy should be considered in all female patients with suspicion of congenital abnormalities and acute abdominal symptoms as standard procedure.
Vaginal septum resection with drainage seems to be the ideal surgery to restore normal vaginal function. After surgery, adolescent patients should undergo regular follow up visits in order to prevent an adhesion-formation recurrence after vaginal septum resection.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.M.-J. and M.K.; methodology, E.M.-J. and M.K.; software, E.R. and M.B.; validation, E.R., M.B., E.S.-P. and A.S.; formal analysis, E.M.-J.; investigation, E.M.-J. and M.K.; resources, Y.O.; data curation, E.R.; writing—original draft preparation, E.M.-J.; writing—review and editing, E.R.; visualization, E.S.-P.; supervision, E.R.; project administration, M.B.; funding acquisition, E.M.-J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. The APC was funded by Pomeranian Medical University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethics approval was not required for this article.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kagan, M.; Pleniceanu, O.; Vivante, A. The genetic basis of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2022, 37, 2231–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rodriguez, M.M. Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and the Urinary Tract (CAKUT). Fetal Pediatr. Pathol. 2014, 33, 293–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Capone, V.P.; Morello, W.; Taroni, F.; Montini, G. Genetics of Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract: The Current State of Play. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Salo, J.; Ikäheimo, R.; Tapiainen, T.; Uhari, M. Childhood urinary tract infections as a cause of chronic kidney disease. Pediatrics 2011, 128, 840–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Van Dam, M.J.C.M.; Zegers, B.S.H.J.; Schreuder, M.F. Case Report: Uterine Anomalies in Girls With a Congenital Solitary Functioning Kidney. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 791499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gungor Ugurlucan, F.; Dural, O.; Yasa, C.; Kirpinar, G.; Akhan, S.E. Diagnosis, management, and outcome of obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis (OHVIRA syndrome): Is there a correlation between MRI findings and outcome? Clin. Imaging 2020, 59, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sleiman, Z.; Wehbe, G.S.; Rassy, E.E.; Zreik, T.; Bitar, R.; Samaha, M.; Khazzaka, A. A novel surgical intervention for an uncommon entity: Laparoscopy-assisted resection of a vaginal septum in obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly syndrome. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 2019, 29, 714–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Smith, N.A.; Laufer, M.R. Obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA) syndrome: Management and follow-up. Fertil. Steril. 2007, 87, 918–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, S.J.; Shim, S.Y.; Cho, H.H.; Park, M.H.; Lee, K.A. Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Obstructed Hemivagina and Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis (OHVIRA) Syndrome. Medicina 2023, 59, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sijmons, A.; Broekhuizen, S.; van der Tuuk, K.; Verhagen, M.; Besouw, M. OHVIRA syndrome: Early recognition prevents genitourinary complications. Ultrasound 2023, 31, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, H.; Ning, G.; Fu, C.; Bao, L.; Guo, Y. Herlyn-Werner-Wun-derlich syndrome: Diverse presentations and diagnosis on MRI. Clin. Radiol. 2020, 75, 480.e17–480.e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gungor Ugurlucan, F.; Bastu, E.; Gulsen, G.; Kurek Eken, M.; Akhan, S.E. OHVIRA syndrome presenting with acute abdomen: A case report and review of the literature. Clin. Imaging 2014, 38, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cobec, I.M.; Rempen, A. OHVIRA-syndrome (Obstructed hemivagina with ipsilateral renal anomaly) as differential diagnosis of acute lower abdominal pain. Ann. Ital. Chir. 2023, 12, S2239253X23038720. [Google Scholar]
  14. Boyraz, G.; Karalok, A.; Turan, T.; Özgül, N. Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome; laparoscopic treatment of obstructing longitudinal vaginal septum in patients with hematocolpos—A different technique for virgin patients. J. Turk. Ger. Gynecol. Assoc. 2020, 21, 303–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Yuan, P.; Peng, X.; Cao, Z.; Wang, L. Proposal of the 3O (Obstruction, Ureteric Orifice, and Outcome) subclassification system associated with obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA). J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2020, 33, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mandava, A.; Prabhakar, R.R.; Smitha, S. OHVIRA syndrome (obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly) with uterus didelphys, an unusual presentation. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2012, 25, e23–e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Arakaki, R.; Yoshida, K.; Imaizumi, J.; Kaji, T.; Kato, T.; Iwasa, T. Obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis (OHVIRA) syndrome: A case report. Int. J. Surg. Case. Rep. 2023, 107, 108368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gündüz, R.; Ağaçayak, E.; Evsen, M.S. OHVIRA syndrome presenting with acute abdomen findings treated with minimally invasive method: Three case reports. Acta Chir. Belg. 2022, 122, 275–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Prada Arias, M.; Muguerza Vellibre, R.; Montero Sánchez, M.; Vázquez Castelo JLArias González, M.; Rodríguez Costa, A. Uterus didelphys with obstructed hemivagina and multicystic dysplastic kidney. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2005, 15, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gilsanz, V.; Cleveland, R.H.; Reid, B.S. Duplication of the müllerian ducts and genitourinary malformations. Part II: Analysis of malformations. Radiology 1982, 144, 797–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zarfati, A.; Lucchetti, M.C. OHVIRA (Obstructed Hemivagina and Ipsilateral Renal Anomaly or Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome): Is it time for age-specific management? J. Pediatr. Surg. 2022, 57, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Karout, S.; Soubra, L.; Rahme, D.; Karout, L.; Khojah, H.M.J.; Itani, R. Prevalence, risk factors, and management practices of primary dysmenorrhea among young females. BMC Womens Health 2021, 21, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bascietto, F.; Liberati, M.; Marrone, L.; Khalil, A.; Pagani, G.; Gustapane, S.; Leombroni, M.; Buca, D.; Flacco, M.E.; Rizzo, G.; et al. Outcome of fetal ovarian cysts diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound examination: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 50, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yu, J.-H.; Lee, S.-R.; Choi, H.; Kim, K.-S.; Kang, B.-M. A New Case of Herlyn–Werner–Wunderlich Syndrome: Uterine Didelphys with Unilateral Cervical Dysgenesis, Vaginal Agenesis, Cervical Distal Ureteral Remnant Fistula, Ureterocele, and Renal Agenesis in a Patient with Contralateral Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 83. [Google Scholar]
  25. Benagiano, G.; Bianchi, P.; Guo, S.W. Endometriosis in adolescent and young women. Minerva Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 73, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Güdücü, N.; Sidar, G.; İşçi, H.; Yiğiter, A.B.; Dünder, İ. The utility of transrectal ultrasound in adolescents when transabdominal or transvaginal ultrasound is not feasible. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2013, 26, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kamal, E.M.; Lakhdar, A.; Baidada, A. Management of a transverse vaginal septum complicated with hematocolpos in an adolescent girl: Case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2020, 77, 748–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kupesić, S.; Kurjak, A.; Skenderovic, S.; Bjelos, D. Screening for uterine abnormalities by three-dimensional ultrasound improves perinatal outcome. J. Perinat. Med. 2002, 30, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cheng, C.; Subedi, J.; Zhang, A.; Johnson, G.; Zhao, X.; Xu, D.; Guan, X. Vaginoscopic Incision of Oblique Vaginal Septum in Adolescents with OHVIRA Syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Blanton, E.N.; Rouse, D.J. Trial of labor in women with transverse vaginal septa. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003, 101, 1110–1112. [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Bijsterveldt, C.; Willemsen, W. Treatment of patients with a congenital transversal vaginal septum or a partial aplasia of the vagina. The vaginal pull-through versus the push-through technique. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2009, 22, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kudela, G.; Wiernik, A.; Drosdzol-Cop, A.; Machnikowska-Sokołowska, M.; Gawlik, A.; Hyla-Klekot, L.; Gruszczyńska, K.; Koszutski, T. Multiple variants of obstructed hemivagina and ipsilateral renal anomaly (OHVIRA) syndrome—One clinical center case series and the systematic review of 734 cases. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2021, 17, 653.e1–653.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kriplani, A.; Dalal, V.; Kachhawa, G.; Mahey, R.; Yadav, V.; Kriplani, I. Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Approach for Management of OHVIRA Syndrome. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. India 2019, 69, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bajaj, S.K.; Misra, R.; Thukral, B.B.; Gupta, R. OHVIRA: Uterus didelphys, blind hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis: Advantage MRI. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2012, 5, 67–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Saleem, S.N. MR imaging diagnosis of uterovaginal anomalies: Current state of the art. Radiographics 2003, 23, e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Ultrasound from extern hospital, when the diagnosis of hematocolpos was mistaken as an ovarian cyst (black arrow). Double uterus was not recognized (white arrow).
Figure 1. Ultrasound from extern hospital, when the diagnosis of hematocolpos was mistaken as an ovarian cyst (black arrow). Double uterus was not recognized (white arrow).
Jcm 12 07227 g001
Figure 2. MRI presents hematocolpos (blue arrow) and hydrometrocolpos in right uterus (white arrow).
Figure 2. MRI presents hematocolpos (blue arrow) and hydrometrocolpos in right uterus (white arrow).
Jcm 12 07227 g002
Figure 3. MRI presents hematocolpos (blue arrow) and a left healthy uterus (white arrow).
Figure 3. MRI presents hematocolpos (blue arrow) and a left healthy uterus (white arrow).
Jcm 12 07227 g003
Figure 4. Intraoperative abdominal sonography and puncture of hematocolpos (white arrow). P is polish equivalent to R-right in english site of the ultrasound screen.
Figure 4. Intraoperative abdominal sonography and puncture of hematocolpos (white arrow). P is polish equivalent to R-right in english site of the ultrasound screen.
Jcm 12 07227 g004
Figure 5. Intraoperative abdominal sonography and drainage of hematocolpos. P is polish equivalent to R-right in english site of the ultrasound screen.
Figure 5. Intraoperative abdominal sonography and drainage of hematocolpos. P is polish equivalent to R-right in english site of the ultrasound screen.
Jcm 12 07227 g005
Figure 6. Left healthy uterus in laparoscopic view.
Figure 6. Left healthy uterus in laparoscopic view.
Jcm 12 07227 g006
Figure 7. Right uterus with hematometra in laparoscopic view.
Figure 7. Right uterus with hematometra in laparoscopic view.
Jcm 12 07227 g007
Figure 8. Double uterus. Right uterus with hematometra.
Figure 8. Double uterus. Right uterus with hematometra.
Jcm 12 07227 g008
Figure 9. Hematosalpinx of right fallopian tube.
Figure 9. Hematosalpinx of right fallopian tube.
Jcm 12 07227 g009
Figure 10. Active endometriosis of peritoneum.
Figure 10. Active endometriosis of peritoneum.
Jcm 12 07227 g010
Table 1. Management flow chart of patients with obstructed hemivagina with ipsilateral renal agenesis (OHVIRA). Flowchart abbreviations: UTI—urinary tract infection; US—ultrasound.
Table 1. Management flow chart of patients with obstructed hemivagina with ipsilateral renal agenesis (OHVIRA). Flowchart abbreviations: UTI—urinary tract infection; US—ultrasound.
Diagnostic and Treatment Flow-Chart of OHVIRA Syndrome
Step 1. Preoperative management
Patients age (mostly occurs in young females), accurate history: time of first period, gradually increased symptoms, the appearance of symptoms during menarche, symptoms increase with each subsequent period, recurrent UTI, urinary disorders [8,9].
Perform physical examination.
Next to the transabdominal US, transperineal and transrectal US can be useful in emergency situations to accurately access the place of abnormality [10].
MRI imaging should be considered as the “gold standard in the diagnostic process” [11].
Planning of the surgery and step by step proceedings is important while operating on patients with urogenital abnormalities. An interdisciplinary collaboration of a urologist and gynecologist is often necessary to treat these patients correctly.
Step 2. Preoperative management
Preoperative counselling with patients, often with psychological assist is essential to support families. The information about future family planning and chanced of spontaneous pregnancy should be given precisely before the surgery [12].
However, hormonal therapy with continuous oral contraceptives should be considered in pre-operative management to give a time for preoperative preparation [13].
Step 3. Surgical management
Surgery is necessary when acute abdominal symptoms are present. “Wait and see” approach is only possible when the clinical situation allows it. Perform laparoscopy and vaginoscopy in order to achieve the correct diagnosis and treat concomitant hematosalpinx and endometriosis [14].
Intraoperative US is helpful to evaluate the place of resection. Unnecessary lengthening the time to diagnosis, contributes to unindentent consequence.
Step 4. Postoperative management
The insertion of uterine catheter filled with saline into a place of stenosis allow to avoid the risk of possible restenosis [15]. Continuous oral contraceptives are recommended to avoid possible consequences like the risk of restenosis.
Step 5. Postoperative management
Pharmacological treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) should be avoided as they can cause the damage of renal structure [12].
Step 6. Follow-up
At 6–12 month after the surgery, urologist re-counselling should be made to decide if the patient requires other imaging tests like uro-scintigraphy to evaluate the function of heathy kidney [2].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Malanowska-Jarema, E.; Starczewski, A.; Osnytska, Y.; Krzyścin, M.; Sowińska-Przepiera, E.; Balzarro, M.; Rubilotta, E. Obstructed Hemivagina with Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis: A Challenging Case Report and a Management Flow Chart. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 7227. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237227

AMA Style

Malanowska-Jarema E, Starczewski A, Osnytska Y, Krzyścin M, Sowińska-Przepiera E, Balzarro M, Rubilotta E. Obstructed Hemivagina with Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis: A Challenging Case Report and a Management Flow Chart. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(23):7227. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Malanowska-Jarema, Ewelina, Andrzej Starczewski, Yana Osnytska, Mariola Krzyścin, Elżbieta Sowińska-Przepiera, Matteo Balzarro, and Emanuele Rubilotta. 2023. "Obstructed Hemivagina with Ipsilateral Renal Agenesis: A Challenging Case Report and a Management Flow Chart" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 23: 7227. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop