Next Article in Journal
The Emerging Role of Visible Light in Melanocyte Biology and Skin Pigmentary Disorders: Friend or Foe?
Next Article in Special Issue
A Retrospective Observational Study to Evaluate Adjacent Segmental Degenerative Change with the Dynesys-Transition-Optima Instrumentation System
Previous Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Early Direct Oral Anticoagulant Monotherapy within One Year of Coronary Stent Implantation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Population-Based Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of a Therapeutic Exercise Protocol for Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Back Pain in Primary Health Care: A Single-Group Retrospective Cohort Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 23
10.3390/jcm12237489
Review Report
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Multidisciplinary Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation on Short-Term Pain and Disability in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review with Network Meta-Analysis

J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7489; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237489
by Ivan Jurak 1,2, Kristina Delaš 1,3, Lana Erjavec 1, Janez Stare 2 and Igor Locatelli 4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(23), 7489; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12237489
Submission received: 8 November 2023 / Revised: 27 November 2023 / Accepted: 1 December 2023 / Published: 4 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low Back Pain Management: Clinical Advances and Perspectives)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This review was very difficult to find a final conclusion because the studies were different. It is difficult to watch a difference between the different therapy ways.

Therefore the study design was not well structurated, it was a high heterogeneity, undocumented use of pain medications might have influenced the results of the primary studies, the study idea is relevant in the daily practice,

The methods are structured , the references well choosen, and discussion too short

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The article is very interesting and contributive. However, it is need to revise.

1- In search strategy mention to "Biofeedback", in the event that "Biofeedback" is MESH TERM. if you mean "Biofeedback, Psychology"[Mesh], please correct your search syntax.

2- This is also true for "Patient Education as Topic"[Mesh] instead of "Patient Education".

3- In my opinion, its better use a table for present of search strategies.

4- Why you haven't use of gray literature?

5- It is appropriate to mention the following items in sup-table1:

- Duration of follow-up

- Exact type of intervention

- Description of setting

6- Have the individual studies mentioned hiding the random allocation list and its solutions?

7- Have the individual studies mentioned blindness?

8-Was there a relationship between the methodological quality (risk bias) of the primary studies and their outcome on the effect size scale? It would have been better to analyze this result.

9-It is better to mention the risk of bias of primary studies in the discussion or conclusion.

Wishing your team the best of success

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authers did the changes in the correct way

Back to TopTop