Next Article in Journal
Thrombotic Events Develop in 1 Out of 5 Patients Receiving ECMO Support: An 11-Year Referral Centre Experience
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical and Imaging Phenotypes and Outcomes in a Costa Rican Cohort of Acute Ischemic Stroke Survivors: A Retrospective Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Non-Invasive Diagnostic Techniques in Dermatology

by
Victor Desmond Mandel
* and
Marco Ardigò
Porphyria and Rare Diseases Unit, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute—IRCCS, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(3), 1081; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031081
Submission received: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 21 January 2023 / Published: 30 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Dermatology)
The search to enhance the clinical diagnostic accuracy for identifying skin cancer has led to the development of non-invasive diagnostic techniques in dermatology including dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) [1]. These tools offer useful information for a rapid non-invasive diagnosis and for the identification of a biopsy site, which can aid pathology evaluation and save time ahead of a confirmatory diagnosis, anticipating treatment and improving patient management.
Dermoscopy is a straightforward tool to evaluate the patient because it utilizes a ×10 to ×100 microscope objective with a light source to magnify and visualize structures present below the skin’s surface. This method, routinely used in adjunct to clinic evaluation, is helpful as the first approach to many diseases, especially in the field of dermato-oncology where it improves the diagnosis of melanoma at an earlier stage [2], non-melanoma skin cancers [3], and other rare skin tumours such as cutaneous T-cell lymphomas [4] and Kaposi’s sarcoma [5]. However, dermoscopy is also associated with unnecessary skin biopsy or excision of benign lesions and a risk of misdiagnosing. Among the non-invasive skin imaging devices, in vivo RCM allows for the visualization of the epidermis, dermoepidermal junction and papillary dermis at a quasi-histological resolution, providing horizontal grayscale colour images related to the refractive index of different tissues and cell structures [6]. RCM has been demonstrated to be very useful for the diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma and its subtyping through the identification of specific confocal criteria [7]. A randomized clinical trial proved that adjunctive use of RCM for suspect melanocytic lesions reduces unnecessary excisions and assures the removal of aggressive melanomas at baseline [8]. RCM can also be helpful in making the distinction between a precancerous lesion and squamous cell carcinoma, especially in body sites such as the lip where the epidermis is thinner [9]. OCT, on the other hand, combines principles of ultrasonography and optical interferometry to provide real-time structural details of both horizontal and vertical sections of the skin [6]. Moreover, dynamic OCT (D-OCT) enables the additional evaluation of vascular details of the tissue [1]. OCT shows a higher penetration depth (up to 2 mm) in comparison to RCM (about 200 µm), but a lower resolution. This technique is extremely useful for the diagnosis of actinic keratosis and non-melanoma skin cancer, especially in cases of hyperkeratosis and/or the presence of ulceration, which are well-known factors that may limit the effectiveness of RCM [6]. D-OCT can identify specific microvascular features that allow us to distinguish between nevi and melanoma, overcoming OCT’s inability to distinguish melanocytic lesions [10].
However, non-invasive diagnostic techniques are also increasingly applied in other fields of dermatology. These technology tools may also assist in the diagnosis of inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases that can be grouped together, based on histopathologic features, as psoriasiform, spongiotic and interface dermatitis, bullous diseases, and scleroderma [1]. Moreover, they can be used to detect precise microscopic features of acne elementary lesions, allowing accurate quantifications for disease severity staging and guiding the clinician in the prescription of tailored treatment protocols based on each patient’s characteristics [11]. In the trichology field, the synergic use of non-invasive technology tools is very useful for the diagnosis of the different alopecia types and their therapeutic monitoring, providing an excellent assessment of morphological changes occurring in the scalp area during treatment and during long-term follow-up [12]. The nail apparatus consists of highly structured, large anatomical units of varying optical densities, and may, therefore, be particularly suitable for imaging. Dermoscopy allows for observation of the nail surface at a high magnification, whereas RCM and OCT can measure the thickness, density and roughness, providing a new and objective evaluation of the nail unit [13].
Non-invasive diagnostic techniques can also be used to monitor wound healing, separating the findings into the three stages of wound healing (inflammatory, proliferative and remodelling phase) [14]. Another application of these technologies is the skin ageing assessment. Clinical manifestations of ageing correlate with the skin cytoarchitectural background detectable with RCM and OCT [15].
In conclusion, non-invasive diagnostic techniques were proven to be useful in diagnosis, follow-up and assessing treatment response, avoiding repeated biopsies and identifying the best target area for biopsy.

Author Contributions

V.D.M.: original draft preparation; M.A.: conceptualization, review and editing of the text. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The authors give the Journal of Clinical Medicine the exclusive right to publish their article in whole or in part in the above-named publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guida, S.; Longhitano, S.; Ardigò, M.; Pampena, R.; Ciardo, S.; Bigi, L.; Mandel, V.D.; Vaschieri, C.; Manfredini, M.; Pezzini, C.; et al. Dermoscopy, confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography features of main inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases: A systematic review. Australas. J. Dermatol. 2022, 63, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nazzaro, G.; Passoni, E.; Pozzessere, F.; Maronese, C.A.; Marzano, A.V. Dermoscopy Use Leads to Earlier Cutaneous Melanoma Diagnosis in Terms of Invasiveness and Size? A Single-Center, Retrospective Experience. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lallas, A.; Argenziano, G.; Zendri, E.; Moscarella, E.; Longo, C.; Grenzi, L.; Pellacani, G.; Zalaudek, I. Update on non-melanoma skin cancer and the value of dermoscopy in its diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Expert. Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2013, 13, 541–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wohlmuth-Wieser, I.; Ramjist, J.M.; Shear, N.; Alhusayen, R. A Morphologic Features of Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas Using Dermoscopy and High Frequency Ultrasound. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 10, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tourlaki, A.; Nazzaro, G.; Wei, Y.; Buffon, S.; Mattioli, M.A.; Marzano, A.V.; Brambilla, L. Clinical, Dermoscopic, Ultrasonographic, and Histopathologic Correlations in Kaposi’s Sarcoma Lesions and Their Differential Diagnoses: A Single-Center Prospective Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 12, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Reggiani, C.; Manfredini, M.; Mandel, V.D.; Farnetani, F.; Ciardo, S.; Bassoli, S.; Casari, A.; Guida, S.; Argenziano, G.; Lallas, A.; et al. Update on non-invasive imaging techniques in early diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 2015, 150, 393–405. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Lupu, M.; Popa, I.M.; Voiculescu, V.M.; Boda, D.; Caruntu, C.; Zurac, S.; Giurcaneanu, C. A Retrospective Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for Basal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosis and Subtyping. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Pellacani, G.; Farnetani, F.; Ciardo, S.; Chester, J.; Kaleci, S.; Mazzoni, L.; Bassoli, S.; Casari, A.; Pampena, R.; Mirra, M.; et al. Effect of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for Suspect Lesions on Diagnostic Accuracy in Melanoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2022, 158, 754–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lupu, M.; Caruntu, A.; Boda, D.; Caruntu, C. In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy-Diagnostic Criteria for Actinic Cheilitis and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Perwein, M.K.E.; Welzel, J.; De Carvalho, N.; Pellacani, G.; Schuh, S. Dynamic Optical Coherence Tomography: A Non-Invasive Imaging Tool for the Distinction of Nevi and Melanomas. Cancers 2022, 15, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Alma, A.; Sticchi, A.; Chello, C.; Guida, S.; Farnetani, F.; Chester, J.; Bettoli, V.; Pellacani, G.; Manfredini, M. Dermoscopy, Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Optical Coherence Tomography Features of Acne: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Peccerillo, F.; Mandel, V.D.; Greco, M.; Ciardo, S.; Pellacani, G. A headstrong case of folliculitis decalvans: Treatment options and evaluation with dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography. Dermatol. Ther. 2020, 33, e14049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Piraccini, B.M.; Granger, C.; Alessandrini, A.; Brandi, N.; Bruni, F.; Mandel, V.D.; Pellacani, G.; Starace, M. Clinical and Instrumental Objective Evidence of the Efficacy of a New Water-Based Nail-Strengthening Solution Containing Pistacia lentiscus and Hyaluronic Acid Applied for Up to 6 Months to Improve the Appearance of Weak, Brittle Nails. Dermatol. Ther. 2020, 10, 119–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Romanelli, M.; Iannone, M. Non-invasive diagnostics in wound healing: Where are we now and where should we go? J. Wound Care 2019, 28, S3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pezzini, C.; Ciardo, S.; Guida, S.; Kaleci, S.; Chester, J.; Casari, A.; Manfredini, M.; Longo, C.; Farnetani, F.; Brugués, A.O.; et al. Skin ageing: Clinical aspects and in vivo microscopic patterns observed with reflectance confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography. Exp. Dermatol. 2022. Online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mandel, V.D.; Ardigò, M. Non-Invasive Diagnostic Techniques in Dermatology. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031081

AMA Style

Mandel VD, Ardigò M. Non-Invasive Diagnostic Techniques in Dermatology. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(3):1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031081

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mandel, Victor Desmond, and Marco Ardigò. 2023. "Non-Invasive Diagnostic Techniques in Dermatology" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 3: 1081. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12031081

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop