Next Article in Journal
Comparison of The Results of Sponsored Genetic Testing Panels for Inherited Retinal Diseases
Previous Article in Journal
Instant Detection of Cerebral Blood Flow Changes in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease during Transcatheter Interventions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 13
Issue 11
10.3390/jcm13113117
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gastric Polyps Detected Incidentally during Gastroscopy and Follow-Up Results

by
Mehmet Onur Gul
1,*,
Selda Oguz Aslayan
2,
Kadir Corbaci
3,
Aytac Selman
4,
Emre Berat Akcay
4,
Zehra Unal Ozdemir
4,
Hakan Ozdemir
4 and
Cebrail Akyuz
4
1
Surgical Oncology Clinic, Malatya Training and Research Hospital, Malatya 44330, Turkey
2
General Surgery Department, Üsküdar State Hospital, Istanbul 34662, Turkey
3
General Surgery Department, Osmaneli Mustafa Selahattin Çetintaş State Hospital, Bilecik 11500, Turkey
4
General Surgery Department, Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34668, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(11), 3117; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113117
Submission received: 25 April 2024 / Revised: 20 May 2024 / Accepted: 23 May 2024 / Published: 26 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Gastroenterology & Hepatopancreatobiliary Medicine)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
(1) Background: We aimed to identify the possible relationship between various diseases of the upper digestive system and colon polyps by analyzing patients with gastric polyps and evaluating the cancers and diseases accompanying the polyps. (2) Methods: Each patient’s age; gender; polyp type and size; presence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), atrophic gastritis, and intestinal metaplasia; status of whether cancer developed during follow-up; status of whether a colonoscopy was performed or not; and colon pathologies detected during colonoscopy were analyzed retrospectively using hospital records. (3) Results: Between the study dates, 19,214 esophagogastroduodenoscopies were performed in the endoscopy unit of our hospital. Gastric polyps were detected in 178 (0.9%) patients. No significant relationship was found between the gastric polyp size and the occurrence of gastric cancer or gastrointestinal system malignancy (p > 0.05). A colonoscopy was performed in 86 of the 178 patients who underwent gastroscopy. The frequency of polyp detection during colonoscopy was statistically significantly higher in patients with gastric polyps than in patients without gastric polyps (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: New prospective studies are needed regarding the relationship between gastric polyps and gastrointestinal system diseases. Going forward, a colonoscopy will be required in gastric polyp patients, especially with FGP.

1. Introduction

The epidemiology of gastritis, gastric atrophy, and gastric lesions associated with increased acid imbalance has undergone significant changes, and the frequency of polyps is thought to be increasing [1]. Over 90% of polyps are asymptomatic and may be found incidentally. Larger polyps can cause issues such as bleeding, anemia, abdominal pain, and stomach obstruction. Although typical appearances of some types of polyps can be seen using endoscopy, a histological evaluation is required to determine the presence of dysplasia. Therefore, a polypectomy should be performed for all gastric polyps to assess the pre-malignancy risk [2].
The three most common types of benign epithelial gastric polyps (BEGPs) are fundic gland polyps (FGPs), gastric hyperplastic polyps (GHPs), and adenomatous polyps. If more than one stomach polyp is present, they are usually of the same histological type [3]. Stomach polyps are classified as epithelial (fundic gland polyps, hyperplastic polyps, adenomatous polyps, hamartomatous polyps) and non-mucosal intramural polyps (gastrointestinal stromal tumors, leiomyoma, inflammatory fibrinoid polyps, fibroma, lipoma, ectopic pancreas, neurogenic tumors, and neuroendocrine tumors) [2].
Colorectal cancers are known to be the most common concurrent cancers in patients with stomach cancer [4]. Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in the world [5]. The relationship between stomach polyps and colon cancer is an important one due to its frequency. A study conducted in 2013 showed that the presence of concurrent colonic neoplasias increased in patients with gastric adenoma or cancer, and a pre-treatment screening colonoscopy is recommended [6]. One study in the literature showed that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection increases the risks of colorectal adenoma and nonadenomatous polyps in patients under the age of 50 with gastric polyps and low-grade intestinal neoplasia [7].
Many studies still cannot provide clear information about whether gastric polyps increase the incidence rate of cancer. To solve this problem, we aimed to identify the possible relationship between various diseases of the upper digestive system and colon polyps by analyzing patients with gastric polyps and evaluating the cancers and diseases accompanying polyps.

2. Materials and Methods

This study was evaluated by correlating the follow-up periods of gastric polyps and the presence of cancer with gastrointestinal system diseases that occurred during this period. This retrospective study group consisted of patients diagnosed with gastric polyps during gastroscopy in the endoscopy units of the University of Health Sciences Haydarpaşa Numune Training and Research Hospital between January 2016 and May 2021. The patients were selected based on their endoscopic examination results and histopathological findings.
The demographic characteristics, polyp characteristics (size, number, location), endoscopic images, histopathological results, and clinical follow-up periods of the patients were collected from hospital records. Patients diagnosed as have polyps during gastroscopy whose pathology results did not indicate the polyp type were excluded from the study. In our study, no polyp patients were diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, considered a nonepithelial polyp type. Twenty-one patients who were detected as having polypoid lesions during gastroscopy, followed up, and found to have foveolar dysplasia due to their histopathology were excluded from the study. One patient’s gastric polyp pathology revealed foveolar hyperplasia and a hyperplastic polyp was detected during the follow-up endoscopy polypectomy. This patient was included in the hyperplastic polyps group. Likewise, four patients with xanthoma as a result of their histopathology were excluded from the study. Patients diagnosed with polyps during their gastroscopy and chronic active or inactive gastritis after their histopathological evaluation and who had the same results during their follow-up period, as well as patients who could not be followed up, were excluded from the study. Each patient’s age; gender; polyp type and size; presence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), atrophic gastritis, or intestinal metaplasia; status of whether their cancer developed during follow-up; status of whether a colonoscopy was performed or not; and colonic pathologies detected during colonoscopy were analyzed retrospectively. The results for the patients who had a follow-up endoscopy were analyzed. The gastric polyp types and the presence of colon polyps were evaluated statistically. In our study, the polyp dimensions in the histopathological evaluation were considered for calculation rather than the polyp size in the endoscopy report. This study aimed to examine the rates of malignancy development in the follow-up period of gastric polyp patients who were not diagnosed with malignancy. For this reason, patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine cancer seen on their first endoscopy were excluded from the study.
Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS software, version 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The average age, gender, and clinical findings of the individuals included in the study were determined using descriptive statistical methods and their frequencies and percentages. We examined whether the numerical variables showed a normal distribution using visual and analytical methods. The chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used for the categorical and nominal variables in pairwise comparisons. In all analyses, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Between the study dates, 19,214 esophagogastroduodenoscopies were performed in the endoscopy unit of our hospital. Gastric polyps were detected in 178 (0.9%) patients (Figure 1). The demographic data and polyp types, sizes, and locations are given in Table 1. Gastric cancer developed during follow-up in 3 patients with gastric polyps. The average time until the follow-up of these three patients, in whom gastric cancer was detected during the follow-up endoscopy, was 71.3 months, with a median of 81 (range 36–97) months. In the first endoscopy results from the patients with gastric cancer, it was observed that two patients had hyperplastic polyps and one patient had an adenoma. The first of the 3 gastric cancer cases was a 62-year-old female patient. In her first gastroscopy, a polypectomy was performed for a 1 cm polyp in the antrum, and as a result of the histopathological examination, it was found to be a hyperplastic polyp. During the gastroscopy performed in the 29th month of the follow-up period due to increased abdominal pain, the biopsy taken from the hard ulcerated area covering the greater curvature was reported as signet ring cell carcinoma. The patient was diagnosed with peritoneal carcinomatosis based on computed tomography results performed for staging, and the treatment was initiated by the oncology specialist. Exitus occurred due to a massive pulmonary embolism in the 7th month of treatment. Another cancer developed at the age of 80, after which a gastric polyp in the cardia was diagnosed and a polypectomy was performed. As a result of the histopathological evaluation, it was found to be a hyperplastic polyp. In the control gastroscopy performed after 92 months due to the patient’s complaints of weight loss and abdominal pain, a mass lesion was observed surrounding the lumen, starting from the cardia and extending to the distal part of the corpus. The pathology result was reported as adenocarcinoma. The patient had peritoneal carcinomatous findings in their radiological imaging results and could not be operated on, could not receive oncological medical treatment, and was given palliative treatment. The patient developed exitus 4 months later. A 44-year-old female patient, who underwent gastroscopy due to treatment-resistant gastroesophageal reflux, underwent a polypectomy for a 1.5 cm polyp in the corpus. The histopathological evaluation result revealed it to be an adenomatous polyp. No pathology was found in the patient’s first-year follow-up gastroscopy results. Approximately 33 months after the first gastroscopy, a mass lesion involving the cardia and corpus was observed in the follow-up gastroscopy performed due to the recurrence of abdominal pain and reflux complaints, and a biopsy was taken. Since the biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma, the patient underwent a total gastrectomy. The patient’s sample pathology was T4N1M0. The patient, who received chemotherapy after the operation, was disease-free in the 48th month. No significant relationship was found between the gastric polyp (GP) size and the occurrence of gastric cancer or gastrointestinal system malignancy (p > 0.05).
During the gastroscopy, the number of patients positive for H. pylori was 31 (17.4%), while the negative patients equaled 147 (82.6%). The atrophic gastritis result was positive in 13 (7.3%) patients and the intestinal metaplasia result was positive in 44 (24.7%) patients out of 178 total patients. The GIS malignancy rates of patients with positive H. pylori results were higher than those with negative ones, although the result was not statistically significant (p: 0.053). The relationship between H. pylori and the GP type is shown in Table 2. The rate of H. pylori was 26.7% in hyperplastic polyps and 25% in NET (Table 2). No statistically significant differences were found in terms of the frequency rates of GIS malignancy and gastric cancer based on the GP types (Table 3). It was observed that of the patients with GIS malignancies that developed during follow-up, three (25%) were gastric adenocarcinoma, three (25%) were colon adenocarcinoma, three (25%) were hepatocellular cancers, two (16.6%) were gallbladder tumors, and one (8.33%) was a cholangiocellular cancer.
A colonoscopy was performed in 86 of the 178 patients who underwent a gastroscopy with GPs. Colon polyps were detected in 32 patients and colon TMs were detected in 3 patients during the follow-up. During the colonoscopy, 4 (12.1%) cases were detected in the cecum, 2 (6.1%) in the ascending colon, 2 (6.1%) in the transverse colon, 4 (12.1%) in the descending colon, and 11 (33%) in the sigmoid colon, while 3 patients (9.1%) had cases in the rectum and 7 patients (21.2%) had cases with multiple locations.
The relationship between the gastric polyp type, patients with polyps detected during colonoscopy, and polyp subtypes is given in Table 4. The type of polyp in the stomach of three patients with colon cancer was found to be a hyperplastic polyp. Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) was detected in one of seven patients with multiple polyps in the colon. The patient’s operational and follow-up findings could not be accessed because the follow-up was carried out in another center. The numbers of polyps in the colonoscopy results of the remaining six patients were less than 10, and attenuated FAP or FAP was not considered. The patients underwent a polypectomy and no colon cancer developed during the follow-up. Patients with fundic gland polyps and hyperplastic polyps were compared statistically in terms of the frequency of colon polyps, and colon polyps were found to be statistically non significant with Bonferroni correction (p = 0.126). To compare the rate of colon polyps in patients with gastric polyps with the control group, colon polyp was detected in 4327 of 21,458 patients who underwent colonoscopy in the same period and did not have gastric polyps. They were evaluated by comparing them with each other. Colon polyps were detected in 37.2% of patients with gastric polyps who underwent colonoscopy. The polyp detection rate during colonoscopy in patients without gastric polyps was 20.2%. The frequency of polyp detection during colonoscopy was statistically significantly higher in patients with gastric polyps than in patients without gastric polyps (p < 0.001). The frequency of polyp detection during colonoscopy was 31.3% in patients with hyperplastic gastric polyps, 57.1% in patients with fundic gland polyps, and 20.2% in patients without gastric polyps. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons (with Bonferroni correction) showed that the frequency of polyp detection on colonoscopy was statistically significantly higher in patients with fundic gland polyps than in those without gastric polyps (p < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise comparisons (with Bonferroni correction) showed that the frequency of polyp detection in colonoscopy was not statistically significant in those with hyperplastic polyps compared to those without gastric polyps (p = 0.168).
Follow-up gastroscopy was performed in 74 patients, and a repeat polypectomy was performed in 44. The median follow-up endoscopy duration was 15.5 months (1–122 months). NET type 1 was detected in 12 patients, and an average of 2.25 (+1.2) follow-up endoscopy procedures were performed on the patients. Since endoscopic submucosal or mucosal resection procedures are not performed in our hospital, these patients underwent polypectomy with follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy and were subsequently followed up with. There were two patients with hamartomatous polyps; one had a colonoscopy and no pathology, and one could not have a colonoscopy and follow-up testing in the long term. These findings were given considering that the pathologies that cause polyp formation in the gastrointestinal system will also cause other gastrointestinal diseases.

4. Discussion

Hyperplastic and fundus gland polyps account for approximately 90% of gastric polyps, followed by adenomas and other histological types, which are much less common. Although some studies state the opposite, Sonnenberg et al. reported the occurrence rate of hyperplastic polyps at 1.79% and fundus gland polyps at 7.72% [1,3,8]. Carmack et al. found that HPs and FGPs were the most common polyp types, accounting for 77% of all polyps [3]. In our study, GHPs and FGPs constituted 83.7% of all gastric polyps.
Fundic gland polyps (FGPs) constitute 8.3–72% of benign epithelial gastric polyps (BEGPs) and can be seen in approximately 8% of endoscopies [8,9]. They are usually 1–5 mm in diameter, with numerous transparent sessiles. These polyps are usually found in the corpus and fundus. FGPs are not associated with atrophic gastritis, and the prevalence rate of H. pylori infection in these patients is very low [10]. It has been reported that these polyps may disappear over time. Kapizoni et al. emphasized in their study that there is no clear evidence that PPI use increases the frequency of FGPs [11]. In addition, retrospective studies show that the average time for the development of FGPs is 32.5 months and that this regresses within three months after PPI discontinuation [12]. Dysplasia is seen in <1% of sporadic FGPs [13]. In a study with a large number of patients, the age of patients with incidentally detected FGPs was higher than for FGPs seen in patients with FAPs, and dysplasia did not develop in the incidental FGPs. The incidence rate was also lower [14]. The presence of dysplastic foci in patients with FGP should raise suspicion for FAP [15]. The risk of gastric cancer may be higher in patients with FAP [16]. A recent study has shown that patients with FAP have a higher incidence rate of gastric cancer [17]. The results of a comprehensive study by Genta et al. revealed that there is no significant correlation between the occurrence of sporadic FGPs and gastrointestinal malignancies. Therefore, they concluded that the occurrence of FGPs was not a reliable indicator of the development of gastrointestinal malignancies [10]. Some comments suggest that such an association with gastric cancer is due to the significantly lower prevalence rate of H. pylori in people with FGPs. There is a strong negative correlation between H. pylori infection and sporadic FGPs. Moreover, FGPs are rare in individuals infected with H. pylori [18]. It has been reported that colonic adenomas (7–45%) and adenocarcinomas (0–4.7%) may develop together or separately in patients with sporadic FGPs [19,20]. Additionally, Amarapurkar et al. reported that since the occurrence of FGPs increases the incidence of gastric carcinoma, the removal of gastric polyps via a polypectomy during endoscopy will prevent the formation of gastric cancer [21]. In our study, the lower incidence rate of H. pylori infection in FGPs compared to GHPs and other polyp types was statistically significant and consistent with the literature. During the follow-up period for patients with FGPs, no patient developed gastric adenocarcinoma. However, in line with the literature, the occurrence rate of colon polyps in patients who underwent colonoscopy while suffering from FGPs was statistically significant according to control group (p < 0.001).
Hyperplastic polyps (GHPs) constitute 28% of all benign epithelial gastric polyps and are sessile or pedunculated polyps measuring less than 2 cm in diameter [8]. Up to 80% of GHPs have been found to regress after H. pylori eradication [11]. In the study by Forte et al., it was found that GHPs recurred more frequently in the antrum than in the corpus localization [22]. A study reported that hypergastrinemia could be a risk factor in the malignant progression of hyperplastic polyps [23]. The prevalence rates of dysplasia in sporadic hyperplastic polyps have been reported to range from 1.9% to 19%, and this rate has a significant relationship with the size [24,25]. Up to 2.1% of resected polyps can develop into adenocarcinomas from hyperplastic polyps [26], with the risk being related to size. This observation has also found its way into the clinical guidelines, with recommendations to remove polyps that are larger than 10 mm [24]. In addition to GHP cancer transformation, cancer development from the surrounding mucosa has also been reported in patients with GHPs. Patients with GHPs require multiple biopsies of the surrounding mucosa, as the risk of adenocarcinoma in the mucosa is higher than in the polyp itself. Therefore, it is necessary to take multiple biopsies of the intervening mucosa to ensure proper diagnosis and treatment. In the study by Bar et al., the malignant transformation rate for GHPs was 1.9%, which was lower than the literature [27]. Since the etiology of relapse is still unclear, long-term follow-up seems necessary to detect and treat relapses to prevent poor outcomes in cancer transformations. However, a neoplastic component in 10% of GHPs does not support a watchful waiting strategy for all cases [22]. Most neoplastic polyps involve low-grade dysplasia, and high-grade dysplasia or early adenocarcinomas occur in only 1.6% (<10%) of cases. It is important to note that 8.4% of patients in the cohort showed GHPs measuring less than 10 mm. Intestinal metaplasia has emerged as a risk factor for the neoplastic transformation of GHPs, as shown in previous studies [22]. In our study, 2 out of 3 patients who developed stomach cancer had GHPs and 9 out of 12 patients who developed GI cancer also had GHPs. Although it was not statistically significant, it was observed that the cancer rate increased in the presence of GHPs.
Gastric adenomas are types of tumors that can lead to gastric cancer. They can be divided into three categories based on their structure: tubular, villous, and tubulovillous. They are relatively rare, making up only 0.69% of benign epithelial gastric polyps (BEGPs). While they can appear anywhere in the stomach, they are most commonly found in the antrum and tend to be solitary [3]. They often occur in the background of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia, although there is no proven relationship with H. pylori infection [3,28]. In our study, one patient had gastric adenocarcinoma that developed based on an adenoma. Colonic polyps were detected in 2 of the colonoscopies performed in this group.
Feng et al. found that the presence of stomach disorders such as GPs, H. pylori infection and atrophic gastritis increased the risk of colorectal polyps (CPs) (p < 0.001). This relationship was found to be significant in both univariate and multivariate analyses [28]. The same study also stated that colorectal polyps were statistically more common in hyperplastic and fundic gland polyps [28]. There are studies showing that the risk of CP increases in individuals with hyperplastic polyps and fundus gland polyps [29,30]. The mechanisms involved are still unclear. Gastric fundus gland polyps are the main components of gastric polyps, most of which are manifestations of long-term proton pump inhibitor treatments [3]. Reporting the opposite of this situation, Loke et al. reported that the incidence of gastric polyps in the groups of patients over 50 years of age with and without colorectal polyps was found to be statistically insignificant [31]. Therefore, some studies suggest that the etiology of positive relationships may be related to the decrease in the stomach acid barrier [3]. Although statistics cannot be produced by excluding all gastroscopy and colonoscopy results, it was thought that the colon polyp rates were proportionally higher in GP especially with FGP in our study. We believe that colon polyps in these patients are considered a precursor of cancer and that these results will lead to more meticulous colonic investigations by GPs with longer follow-up periods.
Inflammatory gastric polyps are complex solitary polyps, which are usually detected incidentally and covered with intact mucosa, often seen in the antrum and pylorus region [32]. Although they are often asymptomatic, they can cause severe findings such as gastric outlet obstructions and massive upper GI bleeding [33]. Gastric NETs are divided into four types, and type 1 NETs constitute 80–90% of all gastric NETs. Hypergastrinemia and H. pylori infection based on chronic atrophic gastritis are factors in the pathogenesis. The prognosis is excellent and the 5-year survival rate is over 95%. The presence of gastric intestinal metaplasia increases the risk of stomach cancer by six times [34]. The presence of IM under endoscopy is the most reliable indicator of atrophy. Patients with advanced gastritis, atrophy, and IM affecting both the antral and corpus mucosa should be considered at high risk for gastric cancer [35]. Gastric adenocarcinoma did not develop in any patient in this group, which is rarer than GHPs and FGPs and is thought not to increase the frequency rate of gastric cancer. Only two patients with inflammatory gastric polyps were accompanied by GIS cancer.
A limitation of the study is that it was not a prospective study and that a single person did not perform the endoscopy procedures. Failure to record the first GP location always means one cannot know whether the cancers and dysplasias that will occur are in the same or different locations. Another limitation of our study is that a colonoscopy was not performed on all GHP and FGP patients. Studies in which all patient groups can be evaluated homogeneously are required. Due to personal decisions and the lack of guidelines for gastric polyps, the physician responsible for the patient often changes the follow-up period depending on their own preference, and it is not known whether standardized work can be conducted thoroughly. The limitation of our study is that not all patients had 5-year and 10-year follow-up periods. For this reason, a study will be planned to evaluate the possible relationship between stomach and gastrointestinal cancers with long-term follow-up periods, including the same population as in our study. The limitation of our study is that the etiology of gastric cancer cases developing in GP patients cannot be fully elucidated and no comparison can be made by creating a control group.
The occurrence of H. pylori was found to be negative at a higher rate in FGP tests. Going forward, colonoscopy will be required in GP patients, especially with FGP. We state the necessity of examining the entire GIS in GP patients. New prospective studies are needed to standardize the treatment and follow-up protocols for all GPs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O.G. and Z.U.O.; methodology, M.O.G. and K.C.; software, E.B.A.; validation, M.O.G. and A.S.; formal analysis, S.O.A.; investigation, S.O.A. and C.A.; resources, A.S. and H.O.; data curation, E.B.A. and Z.U.O.; writing—original draft preparation, M.O.G. and K.C.; writing—review and editing, M.O.G. and K.C.; visualization, M.O.G. and A.S.; supervision, M.O.G., C.A. and H.O.; project administration, H.O. and C.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital (protocol code: E-62977267-771-240761517; date of approval: 2 April 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data from this study are unavailable due to privacy or ethical restrictions, meaning a statement is still required. However, we have data to be shared with the journal editor if the journal requests.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sonnenberg, A.; Genta, R.M. Prevalence of benign gastric polyps in a large pathology database. Dig. Liver Dis. 2015, 47, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Goddard, A.F.; Badreldin, R.; Pritchard, D.M.; Walker, M.M.; Warren, B. The management of gastric polyps. Gut 2010, 59, 1270–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Carmack, S.W.; Genta, R.M.; Schuler, C.M.; Saboorian, H.M. The current spectrum of gastric polyps: A 1-year national study of over 120,000 patients. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 104, 1524–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pan, H.; Zhang, Y.-L.; Fang, C.-Y.; Chen, Y.-D.; He, L.-P.; Zheng, X.-L.; Li, X. Retrospective cohort study investigating association between precancerous gastric lesions and colorectal neoplasm risk. Front. Oncol. 2024, 14, 1320020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Robinson, T.J.; Cummins, K.; Tsung, A. Liver Transplantation for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Perspective and Review of Current Literature. Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31, 1079–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kim, S.Y.; Jung, S.W.; Hyun, J.J.; Koo, J.S.; Choung, R.S.; Yim, H.J.; Lee, S.W.; Choi, J.H. Is colonoscopic screening necessary for patients with gastric adenoma or cancer? Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013, 58, 3263–3269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Han, Z.; Guo, X.; Peng, C.; Zhang, W.; Nan, X.; Wan, M.; Li, Y.; Li, Y. Esophagogastroscopic Abnormalities Potentially Guided Patients Younger than 50 Years Old to Undergo Colonoscopy Earlier: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2024, 69, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Morais, D.J.; Yamanaka, A.; Zeitune, J.M.R.; Andreollo, N.A. Gastric polyps: A retrospective analysis of 26,000 digestive endoscopies. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2007, 44, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vatansever, S.; Akpınar, Z.; Alper, E.; İpek, S.; Yazıcıoğlu, N.; Ekinci, N.; Ünsal, B. Gastric polyps and polypoid lesions: Retrospective analysis of 36650 endoscopic procedures in 29940 patients. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 26, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Genta, R.M.; Schuler, C.M.; Robiou, C.I.; Lash, R.H. No association between gastric fundic gland polyps and gastrointestinal neoplasia in a study of over 100,000 patients. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2009, 7, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kapizioni, C.; Kourkoulis, P.; Kartsoli, S.; Koutoufaris, G.; Giannelis, P.; Mellos, A.; Milioni, K.; Michalopoulos, G.; Vrakas, S.; Xourgias, V. Gastric polyps: A retrospective cohort analysis of 23,668 endoscopies indicates changing epidemiological and phenotypic characteristics. Gastroenterol. Rev. 2024, 19, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Choudhry, U.; Boyce, H.W., Jr.; Coppola, D. Proton pump inhibitor-associated gastric polyps: A retrospective analysis of their frequency, and endoscopic, histologic, and ultrastructural characteristics. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1998, 110, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stolte, M.; Vieth, M.; Ebert, M.P. High-grade dysplasia in sporadic fundic gland polyps: Clinically relevant or not? Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2003, 15, 1153–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Straub, S.F.; Drage, M.G.; Gonzalez, R.S. Comparison of dysplastic fundic gland polyps in patients with and without familial adenomatous polyposis. Histopathology 2018, 72, 1172–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Bianchi, L.K.; Burke, C.A.; Bennett, A.E.; Lopez, R.; Hasson, H.; Church, J.M. Fundic gland polyp dysplasia is common in familial adenomatous polyposis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2008, 6, 180–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lordick, F.; Carneiro, F.; Cascinu, S.; Fleitas, T.; Haustermans, K.; Piessen, G.; Vogel, A.; Smyth, E. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2022, 33, 1005–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mankaney, G.; Leone, P.; Cruise, M.; LaGuardia, L.; O’Malley, M.; Bhatt, A.; Church, J.; Burke, C.A. Gastric cancer in FAP: A concerning rise in incidence. Fam. Cancer 2017, 16, 371–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. O’Connor, H.J. Forty years of Helicobacter pylori infection and changes in findings at esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Helicobacter 2023, 28, e13026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Declich, P.; Tavani, E.; Ferrara, A.; Caruso, S.; Bellone, S. Sporadic fundic gland polyps: Clinico-pathologic features and associated diseases. Pol. J. Pathol. 2005, 56, 131–137. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jung, A.; Vieth, M.; Maier, O.; Stolte, M. Fundic gland polyps (Elster’s cysts) of the gastric mucosa. A marker for colorectal epithelial neoplasia? Pathol. Res. Pract. 2002, 198, 731–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Amarapurkar, A.D.; Kale, K.M.; Naik, L.P.; Shukla, A.P. Histomorphological analysis of gastric polyps. Indian J. Pathol. Microbiol. 2021, 64, S69–S72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Forté, E.; Petit, B.; Walter, T.; Lépilliez, V.; Vanbiervliet, G.; Rostain, F.; Barsic, N.; Albeniz, E.; Gete, G.G.; Gabriel, J.C.M. Risk of neoplastic change in large gastric hyperplastic polyps and recurrence after endoscopic resection. Endoscopy 2020, 52, 444–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hu, H.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, G.; Pritchard, D.M.; Zhang, S. Risk factors and clinical correlates of neoplastic transformation in gastric hyperplastic polyps in Chinese patients. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Banks, M.; Graham, D.; Jansen, M.; Gotoda, T.; Coda, S.; Di Pietro, M.; Uedo, N.; Bhandari, P.; Pritchard, D.M.; Kuipers, E.J. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of gastric adenocarcinoma. Gut 2019, 68, 1545–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kang, H.M.; Oh, T.H.; Seo, J.Y.; Joen, T.J.; Seo, D.D.; Shin, W.C.; Choi, W.C.; Kim, J.Y. Clinical factors predicting for neoplastic transformation of gastric hyperplastic polyps. Korean J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 58, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Han, A.-R.; Sung, C.O.; Kim, K.M.; Park, C.-K.; Min, B.-H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, J.Y.; Chang, D.K.; Kim, Y.-H.; Rhee, P.-L. The clinicopathological features of gastric hyperplastic polyps with neoplastic transformations: A suggestion of indication for endoscopic polypectomy. Gut Liver 2009, 3, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bar, N.; Kinaani, F.; Sperber, A.D.; Amir-Barak, H.; Dekel, R. Low risk of neoplasia and intraprocedural adverse events in gastric hyperplastic polypectomy. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2021, 55, 851–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Feng, L.; Zhao, K.; Wang, G.; Dong, R.; Zhang, M.; Xia, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Tian, D.; Yan, W. Relationship between endoscopic gastric abnormalities and colorectal polyps: A cross-sectional study based on 33,439 Chinese patients. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2023, 20, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cao, H.; He, N.; Song, S.; Xu, M.; Piao, M.; Yan, F.; Wang, B. Is surveillance colonoscopy necessary for patients with sporadic gastric hyperplastic polyps? PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, S.; Zheng, D.; Yang, Z.; Hong, L.; Ng, S.C.; Li, M.; Huang, S.; Wang, S.; Li, L.; Li, M. Patients with gastric polyps need colonoscopy screening at younger age: A large prospective cross-sectional study in China. J. Cancer 2019, 10, 4623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Loke, S.-S.; Chuah, S.-K. Factors Associated with Colorectal Polyps in Middle-Aged and Elderly Populations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 7543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dias, E.; Marques, M.; Santos-Antunes, J.; Baldaque-Silva, F.; Moutinho-Ribeiro, P.; Macedo, G.; Emanuel, D.; Margarida, M.; João, S.-A.; Francisco, B.-S. The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the management of gastric inflammatory fibroid polyps: A single-center experience. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2022, 114, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Mitsui, Y.; Kagemoto, K.; Itagaki, T.; Inoue, S.; Naruse, K.; Muguruma, N.; Takayama, T. Gastric inflammatory fibroid polyp morphologically changed by Helicobacter pylori eradication. Clin. J. Gastroenterol. 2015, 8, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Köseoğlu, H.; Duzenli, T.; Sezikli, M. Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms: A review. World J. Clin. Cases 2021, 9, 7973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pimentel-Nunes, P.; Libânio, D.; Marcos-Pinto, R.; Areia, M.; Leja, M.; Esposito, G.; Garrido, M.; Kikuste, I.; Megraud, F.; Matysiak-Budnik, T. Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (maps II): European Society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019. Endoscopy 2019, 51, 365–388. [Google Scholar]
Jcm 13 03117 g001
Figure 1. Endoscopic image of polyp types: (a) multiple-location fundic gland polyp; (b) hyperplastic polyp appearance.
Figure 1. Endoscopic image of polyp types: (a) multiple-location fundic gland polyp; (b) hyperplastic polyp appearance.
Jcm 13 03117 g001
Table 1. Demographic findings and gastric polyp types.
Table 1. Demographic findings and gastric polyp types.
Mean ± SS/Number (%)Minimum–Maximum
Age (year)57.67 ± 14.3318–88
Polyp Size (mm)7.71 ± 3.922–58
Gender
Female110 (61.8%)
Male68 (38.2%)
Polyp Types Age Mean (+SD)
Hyperplastic Polyp90 (50.6%)60.3 ± 13.2
Fundic Gland Polyp59 (33.1%)52.7 ± 15.4
Inflammatory Polyp9 (5.1%)64.5 ± 10.8
NET 112 (6.7%)53.6 ± 13.8
Hamartomatous Polyp2 (1.1%)47 ± 14.1
Adenomatous Polyp6 (3.4%)67.16 ± 6.46
Gastric Polyp Location
Cardia26 (14.6%)
Fundus22 (12.4%)
Corpus53 (29.8%)
Antrum43 (24.2%)
Fundus + Corpus13 (7.3%)
Cardia + Fundus3 (1.3%)
Corpus + Antrum14 (7.9%)
Cardia + Antrum4 (2.2%)
1 Neuroendocrine tumors.
Table 2. Relationship between polyp types and H. pylori.
Table 2. Relationship between polyp types and H. pylori.
Gastric Polyp TypeH. pylori Positive
(N = 31)		H. pylori Negative
(N = 147)		p
Hyperplastic Polyp24 (26.7%)66 (73.3%)0.006 *
Fundic Gland Polyp2 (3.4%)57 (96.6%)
Inflammatory + Hamartomatous Polyp1 (9%)9 (90%)
NET 13 (25%)9 (75%)
Adenomatous Polyp1 (16.7%)5 (83.3%)
GIS 2 Malignancy
Yes5 (38.5%)8 (61.5%)0.053 **
None26 (15.8%)139 (84.2%)
* Chi-square test. ** Fisher’s exact test. 1 Neuroendocrine tumors. 2 GIS—gastrointestinal system.
Table 3. Relationship between polyp types and malignancy and follow-up period.
Table 3. Relationship between polyp types and malignancy and follow-up period.
Gastric Polyp TypeGIS 1 MalignancypGastric
Cancer		Follow-Up Time
(Months)
YesNoneValueYesNone
Hyperplastic Polyp9 (10%)81 (90%)0.080 *2 (2.2%)88 (97.8%)71 (0–149)
Fundic Gland Polyp0 (0%)59 (100%)0 (0%)59 (100%)65 (0–139)
Inflammatory + Hamartomatous Polyp2 (18.2%)9 (81.8%)0 (0%)11 (100%)20 (1–140)
NET 20 (0%)12 (100%)0 (0%)12 (100%)62 (0–85)
Adenomatous Polyp1 (16.7%)5 (83.3%)1 (16.7%)5 (83.3%)73.5 (36–146)
* Chi-square test. 1 GIS—gastrointestinal system. 2 Neuroendocrine tumors.
Table 4. Distribution and comparison of patients with gastric polyps and patients with polyps detected as a result of a colonoscopy.
Table 4. Distribution and comparison of patients with gastric polyps and patients with polyps detected as a result of a colonoscopy.
Gastric Polyp TypeColon Polypsp
Value		Colon Low-Grade DysplasiaColon High-Grade DysplasiaHyperplastic Colon Polyps
Yes None
Hyperplastic Polyp15 (31.2%)33 (68.8%)0.126 *12 (25%)1 (2.1%)2 (4.2%)
Fundic Gland Polyp12 (57.1%)9 (42.9%) 10 (47.6%)0 (0%)2 (9.5%)
Inflammatory + Hamartomatous Polyp2 (28.6%)5 (71.4%) 1 (14.3%)0 (0%)1 (14.3%)
NET 11 (16.7%)5 (83.3%) 0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (16.7%)
Adenomatous Polyp2 (50%)2 (50%) 1 (25%)1 (25%)0 (0%)
* Chi-square test. 1 Neuroendocrine tumors.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gul, M.O.; Oguz Aslayan, S.; Corbaci, K.; Selman, A.; Akcay, E.B.; Unal Ozdemir, Z.; Ozdemir, H.; Akyuz, C. Gastric Polyps Detected Incidentally during Gastroscopy and Follow-Up Results. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113117

AMA Style

Gul MO, Oguz Aslayan S, Corbaci K, Selman A, Akcay EB, Unal Ozdemir Z, Ozdemir H, Akyuz C. Gastric Polyps Detected Incidentally during Gastroscopy and Follow-Up Results. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(11):3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113117

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gul, Mehmet Onur, Selda Oguz Aslayan, Kadir Corbaci, Aytac Selman, Emre Berat Akcay, Zehra Unal Ozdemir, Hakan Ozdemir, and Cebrail Akyuz. 2024. "Gastric Polyps Detected Incidentally during Gastroscopy and Follow-Up Results" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 11: 3117. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113117

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop