Next Article in Journal
Using Deep Learning to Distinguish Highly Malignant Uveal Melanoma from Benign Choroidal Nevi
Previous Article in Journal
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Based Semi-Quantitative Methods for Rheumatoid Arthritis: From Scoring to Measurement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Is Associated with Short-Term Memory Decline and Dementia in Individuals of African Ancestry

by
Tzuriel Sapir
1,
Patrick Augello
1,
Roy Lee
1,
Makayla McCoskey
2,
Rebecca Salowe
1,
Victoria Addis
1,
Prithvi Sankar
1,
Gui-Shuang Ying
1 and
Joan M. O’Brien
1,*
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
2
TOC Eye and Face, Austin, TX 78705, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(14), 4140; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144140 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 3 June 2024 / Revised: 9 July 2024 / Accepted: 13 July 2024 / Published: 16 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)

Abstract

:
Background: Over the last decade, studies have suggested that primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) may be associated with cognitive impairment and dementia, as both pathologies are age-related neurodegenerative processes. It remains unclear to what extent neurodegeneration in POAG extends to other neurological functions beyond vision, such as cognition. This follow-up study examined the potential association between POAG and cognitive decline in an African ancestry population. Methods: The Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) was administered to POAG cases and controls previously enrolled in the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study. Cases were assessed for retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and for the presence of dementia via chart review. Comparisons between POAG cases and controls were performed using two-sample t-tests for the T-MoCA total score and five subsection scores, and using chi-squared tests for incidence of dementia. Current scores were compared to scores from this same cohort from 7 years prior. Results: The T-MoCA was administered to 13 cases and 20 controls. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) T-MoCA total score was 15.5 ± 4.0 in cases and 16.7 ± 3.5 in controls (p = 0.36). However, there was a borderline significant difference in the delayed recall sub-score (2.3 ± 1.6 for cases vs. 3.4 ± 1.5 for controls, p = 0.052) and a significant difference in its sub-domain, the memory index score (MIS, 9.1 ± 4.3 for cases vs. 12.1 ± 3.0 for controls, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between cases and controls for the remaining subsections. During 7 years of follow-up, a higher incidence of dementia was noted in POAG cases (7.1% for cases vs. 0% for controls, p = 0.058). Over 7 years, there was no significant deterioration in the cognitive performance of cases versus controls, and no association was seen between RNFL thinning and cognitive impairment. Conclusions: In this small-sample follow-up study of African ancestry individuals, POAG cases demonstrated worse short-term memory and higher incidence of dementia compared to controls. Future larger studies are needed to further investigate the presence and impact of neurodegeneration in POAG.

1. Introduction

Glaucoma is a disease characterized by retinal ganglion cell (RGC) damage, optic nerve degeneration, and subsequent progressive vision loss. It is the leading cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide [1]. Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common form of the disease, with an estimated 68.56 million people affected worldwide [2]. Risk factors for development of POAG include older age, family history of disease, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), and African ancestry [3].
In the last decade, it has been suggested that POAG may be associated with cognitive impairment, as both pathologies are age-related neurodegenerative processes. Several common risk factors and associated pathophysiologic mechanisms are shared between dementia and POAG, including intracranial pressure changes and associated increased IOP, optic nerve and RGC degeneration, cerebrospinal fluid circulatory failure and sequestration, and the presence of both amyloid-β and tau proteins, known for their role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
The association between POAG and cognitive impairment comes in lieu of a paradigm shift in POAG—from the view of POAG as a primary disease of the eye to a recognition of POAG as an ocular manifestation of overarching systemic dysregulation [5]. Factors beyond elevated IOP likely contribute to the pathogenesis of vision loss in POAG, as controlling IOP—while partially effective at slowing disease progression—fails to prevent continued visual deterioration in up to 37% of POAG patients [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Furthermore, there is evidence that POAG is associated with lesions in the central visual pathway, including the lateral geniculate body and the primary visual cortex, and that several POAG risk loci are shared with other neurodegenerative disorders [18,19,20]. This has sparked interest in uncovering other targets for treatment for POAG patients, such as neuroprotective agents [21].
It remains unclear to what extent neurodegeneration in POAG extends to other neurological functions beyond vision, such as cognition. Studies have found that the prevalence of POAG was increased in patients with AD, and that patients with POAG are more likely to develop dementia [22,23,24,25,26]. This relationship has also been shown to be specific for POAG as opposed to primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) as opposed to high-tension glaucoma (HTG) [27,28]. In contrast, other studies have found minimal association between POAG status and risk of dementia or cognitive decline, or have been limited by small sample size or by the confounding of glaucomatous vision loss impacting cognitive assessment scores [29,30,31,32]. The association between POAG and cognitive decline remains particularly unclear and understudied in individuals of African ancestry, who demonstrate the highest incidence and most severe progression of POAG [33,34,35,36]. The predictive value of cognitive screening for dementia or AD in POAG patients has similarly remained undefined, leaving the clinical utility of such testing unclear.
Here, we investigated the association between POAG and cognitive impairment in African ancestry individuals, with the goal of determining whether POAG cases experience greater cognitive decline compared to healthy controls. Within the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study cohort, we compared case and control scores on the Telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA), a validated cognitive screening tool designed for those with visual impairment. We also evaluated whether prior MoCA scores from these same subjects were predictive of severe cognitive decline or a dementia diagnosis over a period of seven years [31,37]. In a topic that lacks longitudinal analyses of a historically understudied African ancestry population, the aim of this study was to determine if MoCA scores can serve as a biomarker for further cognitive decline and risk of dementia among POAG patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

Subjects for this study were recruited from the larger POAAGG study. Eligibility criteria for the POAAGG study include self-identification as Black (either African American, African descent, or African Caribbean) and an age of 35 years or older. Exclusion criteria include a history of glaucoma, iritis, uveitis, iridocyclitis, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and advanced proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Subjects were recruited during regularly scheduled visits to the Ophthalmology Department at the University of Pennsylvania, as well as several nearby ophthalmology clinics and outreach events. Fellowship-trained glaucoma specialists or ophthalmologists categorized subjects as case, control, or suspect based on detailed clinical criteria [37]. Briefly, cases were defined as having an open iridocorneal angle and characteristic optic nerve defects with corresponding visual field loss, and controls exhibited no confounding ocular conditions. An extensive description of the POAAGG study design, baseline demographics, complete eligibility criteria, and phenotyping methods is found elsewhere [37]. All subjects provided informed consent prior to involvement. The study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board (IRB).

2.2. Prior Cognitive Assessment

We previously assessed and reported the cognitive function of 137 POAAGG subjects between June 2016 and August 2017 using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a test developed to screen for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) [31]. The MoCA has previously been validated and shown to be sensitive and specific for the detection of MCI, with higher sensitivity for MCI than the Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) [38]. MoCA administration takes less than 15 min and assesses patients in seven domains of cognitive function: visuospatial/executive function, naming, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall (which is further classified by a memory index score, MIS), and orientation. MoCA total score and sub-scores of each domain range from 0 to 30 points, with a lower score indicating worse cognitive function. The details, results, and conclusions of this sampling have been previously described [31].

2.3. T-MoCA Assessment

In this study, we re-approached POAAGG cases and controls who had completed a prior MoCA assessment (described above). Between June and November 2023, we called 137 subjects and invited each individual to undergo the T-MoCA. The T-MoCA is adapted for administration by voice only, by removing the visuospatial/executive function and naming sections of the test, which require visual abilities, but keeping five sub-domains: attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall (including MIS), and orientation. T-MoCA total score and sub-scores for each domain range from 0 to 22 points, with a lower score indicating worse cognitive function. T-MoCA is validated against in-person administration of the full MoCA, and T-MoCA and MoCA scores are significantly correlated and have similar sensitivity for detecting cognitive impairment identified through an extensive in-person cognitive evaluation [39,40]. We chose to use the T-MoCA, rather than the full MoCA that was previously used, to increase our reach of subjects, who can complete the assessment from the comfort of their homes, as well as to reduce the confounding effect of visual impairment between the case and control groups. Of the 137 subjects approached several times, 33 (13 POAG cases and 20 controls) participated in this study. A total of 21 declined to participate, 16 were reported deceased, and 67 could not be reached (did not answer phone, did not have updated contact information, etc.). One investigator (TS), masked to diagnostic status (case or control) and other ophthalmic testing data, administered the T-MoCA to all 33 subjects.

2.4. Demographic and Phenotypic Information

Demographic information, including age, sex, medical history, and social history, were obtained during standardized interviews during enrollment and augmented using electronic medical records. Each subject also underwent a thorough ophthalmological assessment to allow collection of ocular phenotypic information, including retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements from Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). No additional OCT testing was conducted at the time of T-MoCA administration. Dementia history was verbally obtained during T-MoCA administration.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Comparison between POAG cases and controls in their baseline characteristics and T-MoCA scores were performed using two-sample t-test for means, and a chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test for proportions. Associations between baseline factors with total T-MoCA score were evaluated using generalized linear models. Spearman correlation coefficients (R) were calculated to assess correlation between RNFL thickness and T-MoCA scores and correlation between change of RNFL thickness and change of T-MoCA scores. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Population Characteristics

The T-MoCA test was administered to 13 POAG cases and 20 healthy controls. The mean age ± SD was similar between cases (74.2 ± 10.4 years) and controls (73.9 ± 12.9 years) (p = 0.94). Cases and controls were similar in other demographic and clinical characteristics (Table 1).

3.2. Demographic Characteristics Are Not Associated with T-MoCA Score Changes

In the univariate analysis, the mean T-MoCA total score was 15.46 in cases and 16.70 in controls (mean difference = −1.24, 95% CI = −3.96, 1.48, p = 0.36). No demographic characteristics were significantly associated with T-MoCA score (Table 2).

3.3. POAG Status Is Associated with Short-Term Memory Decline

When comparing T-MoCA subsection domain scores between POAG cases and controls, there was a borderline significant difference between cases and controls in the delayed recall domain (mean difference = −1.09, 95% CI = −2.20, 0.01, p = 0.052) and a significant difference in its sub-domain, the memory index score (mean difference = −3.02, 95% CI = −5.60, −0.44, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences between cases and controls for the remaining subsection domain scores (Table 3).

3.4. POAG Status Is Associated with Dementia

On chart review, during the seven-year follow-up after the initial MoCA assessment at baseline, 5 (7.14%) of 70 POAG cases and 0 of 67 controls developed dementia (p = 0.058, Table 4).

3.5. POAG Status Is Not Associated with Increased Rate of Cognitive Decline over Time

We compared the cognitive score difference between cases and controls in 2016–2017 (assessed by MoCA) and in 2023 (assessed by T-MoCA) for each of the sections assessed in T-MoCA. We observed no difference in these subsection scores between 2016–2017 and 2023 between cases and controls (Table 5).

3.6. Cognitive Decline in POAG Is Not Associated with Disease Severity

No significant association was found between RNFL thickness and T-MoCA score. Additionally, no significant association was observed between the change in RNFL thickness from 2016–2017 to 2023 and the change in each subject’s subsection score compared the mean subsection score (Table 6).

4. Discussion

This study sought to define the association between POAG status and cognitive decline in the present and over time in an African ancestry cohort. We found no significant difference in total T-MoCA score between cases and controls. However, there was a significant difference between cases and controls in the delayed recall subsection and its subclassification, the MIS. This section asked subjects to remember a list of five unrelated words, and to recall the list at the conclusion of the T-MoCA. Subjects were graded on the number of words correctly recalled and the use of hints. This result may suggest that certain cognitive abilities, such as the short-term memory tested in this section, may become impaired in POAG. While, to our knowledge, no other studies have directly examined the link between POAG and short-term memory loss, several studies have found an association between POAG and other forms of cognitive decline [25,31,41]. Our novel results, therefore, suggest that T-MoCA may serve as a tool for assessing short-term memory loss as a sign of early cognitive decline in the POAG population.
We further found a borderline significant difference between cases and controls in the diagnosis of dementia over the seven-year span of this study. These results are of particular interest given the work of Julayanont et al., which suggests that the MIS may serve as a predictor of conversion from MCI to AD [42]. Indeed, if low MIS score serves as a positive predictor for dementia, and if POAG status is associated with both a lower MIS score and a higher incidence of dementia, these results point towards a novel idea: in a POAG population, T-MoCA or MIS testing may be used to assess the risk of dementia and the relative indications for seeking neuroprotective treatment. To our knowledge, we are the first to report this novel finding.
Our results are also of interest given the association of glaucoma with AMD, and of AMD with dementia. Both POAG and AMD are neurodegenerative diseases that occur in the elderly and have a strong genetic component. These diseases have also previously been associated with each other, and both have independently been linked to cognitive decline [27,43,44,45,46]. This might suggest that there is a background driver of neurodegeneration shared among POAG, AMD, and dementia [47]. More research is needed on this topic.
Over time, there was no increased score disparity between cases and controls in each of the subsections tested on T-MoCA. Similarly, no significant association was seen between worsening disease severity (as measured by RNFL thickness) and worsening cognitive decline over seven years. In the literature, the relationship between RNFL thickness and cognitive abilities is similarly unclear [31,48]. There are several possible explanations for our results amidst this uncertainty. It is possible that neurodegeneration in POAG may not extend past the visual tract or globally affect neural pathways that moderate cognition. Alternatively, T-MoCA may not be a sensitive enough test to detect subtle differences in cognitive function in POAG. It is also possible that additional factors may affect cognitive decline in POAG, and that better-powered studies may be needed to define this observation.
This study has several limitations. This study consisted of an entirely African ancestry cohort. While POAG is more common and severe among African ancestry individuals, this population has been severely under-represented in POAG research, contributing to premature vision loss and subsequent economic and health outcomes. Therefore, there is a critical need for studies of open-angle glaucoma in this population. However, these results may not be applicable to other populations or reflect an association between POAG and cognitive function that is applicable to all patients [31]. Additionally, this study was limited by its small sample size and the inability to follow up with a substantial portion of the original cohort. Similarly, visual field data were not used as markers of disease progression due to the lack of high-quality data for all subjects of this small cohort study.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, findings from this study suggest that there may be an association between POAG and worsening short-term memory and the development of dementia. Future studies are needed to further elucidate the relationship and clinical utility of cognitive testing in POAG.

Author Contributions

Conception, design, and development of methodology: T.S., R.S. and J.M.O.; acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data: T.S., P.A., R.L., M.M., R.S., G.-S.Y. and J.M.O.; writing of the manuscript: T.S.; review and revision of the manuscript: T.S., P.A., R.L., M.M., R.S., V.A., P.S., G.-S.Y. and J.M.O.; administrative, technical, and material support: R.S. and J.M.O.; study supervision: R.S. and J.M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland (grant #1RO1EY023557) and Vision Research Core Grant (P30 EY001583). Funds also came from the Jeffrey W. Berger Research Award, Minority Ophthalmology Mentoring Program Research Grant, F.M. Kirby Foundation, Research to Prevent Blindness, The UPenn Hospital Board of Women Visitors, and The Paul and Evanina Bell Mackall Foundation Trust. The Ophthalmology Department at the Perelman School of Medicine and the VA Hospital in Philadelphia, PA also provided support. The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study protocol and consent statement were reviewed and approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board (protocol number 812036; continuing review approved on 30 January 2024). All subjects provided written informed consent. The research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators; on behalf of theVision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: The Right to Sight: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob. Health 2021, 9, e144–e160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, N.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Jiang, B. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in the last 20 years: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cole, B.S.; Gudiseva, H.V.; Pistilli, M.; Salowe, R.; McHugh, C.P.; Zody, M.C.; Chavali, V.R.M.; Ying, G.S.; Moore, J.H.; O’Brien, J.M. The Role of Genetic Ancestry as a Risk Factor for Primary Open-angle Glaucoma in African Americans. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021, 62, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jain, S.; Aref, A.A. Senile Dementia and Glaucoma: Evidence for a Common Link. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res. 2015, 10, 178–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wey, S.; Amanullah, S.; Spaeth, G.L.; Ustaoglu, M.; Rahmatnejad, K.; Katz, L.J. Is primary open-angle glaucoma an ocular manifestation of systemic disease? Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2019, 257, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sen, S.; Saxena, R.; Tripathi, M.; Vibha, D.; Dhiman, R. Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease and glaucoma: Overlaps and missing links. Eye 2020, 34, 1546–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Janciauskiene, S.; Westin, K.; Grip, O.; Krakau, T. Detection of Alzheimer peptides and chemokines in the aqueous humor. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 21, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Guo, L.; Salt, T.E.; Luong, V.; Wood, N.; Cheung, W.; Maass, A.; Ferrari, G.; Russo-Marie, F.; Sillito, A.M.; Cheetham, M.E.; et al. Targeting amyloid-beta in glaucoma treatment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 13444–13449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gupta, N.; Fong, J.; Ang, L.C.; Yucel, Y.H. Retinal tau pathology in human glaucomas. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2008, 43, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schon, C.; Hoffmann, N.A.; Ochs, S.M.; Burgold, S.; Filser, S.; Steinbach, S.; Seeliger, M.W.; Arzberger, T.; Goedert, M.; Kretzschmar, H.A.; et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of fibrillar tau in the retina of P301S transgenic mice. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e53547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Choi, Y.K. An Altered Neurovascular System in Aging-Related Eye Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Leske, M.C.; Heijl, A.; Hussein, M.; Bengtsson, B.; Hyman, L.; Komaroff, E.; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial, G. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: The early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2003, 121, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Oliver, J.E.; Hattenhauer, M.G.; Herman, D.; Hodge, D.O.; Kennedy, R.; Fang-Yen, M.; Johnson, D.H. Blindness and glaucoma: A comparison of patients progressing to blindness from glaucoma with patients maintaining vision. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2002, 133, 764–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jay, J.L.; Allan, D. The benefit of early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open angle glaucoma relative to severity of disease. Eye 1989, 3 Pt 5, 528–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nucci, C.; Martucci, A.; Martorana, A.; Sancesario, G.M.; Cerulli, L. Glaucoma progression associated with altered cerebral spinal fluid levels of amyloid beta and tau proteins. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2011, 39, 279–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration.The AGIS Investigators. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2000, 130, 429–440. [CrossRef]
  17. Cockburn, D.M. Does reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) prevent visual field loss in glaucoma? Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 1983, 60, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chaturvedi, N.; Hedley-Whyte, E.T.; Dreyer, E.B. Lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1993, 116, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gupta, N.; Ang, L.C.; Noel de Tilly, L.; Bidaisee, L.; Yucel, Y.H. Human glaucoma and neural degeneration in intracranial optic nerve, lateral geniculate nucleus, and visual cortex. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006, 90, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Diaz-Torres, S.; He, W.; Thorp, J.; Seddighi, S.; Mullany, S.; Consortium, I.I.G.G.; Hammond, C.J.; Hysi, P.G.; Pasquale, L.R.; Khawaja, A.P.; et al. Disentangling the genetic overlap and causal relationships between primary open-angle glaucoma, brain morphology and four major neurodegenerative disorders. eBioMedicine 2023, 92, 104615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vishwaraj, C.R.; Kavitha, S.; Venkatesh, R.; Shukla, A.G.; Chandran, P.; Tripathi, S. Neuroprotection in glaucoma. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 70, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tamura, H.; Kawakami, H.; Kanamoto, T.; Kato, T.; Yokoyama, T.; Sasaki, K.; Izumi, Y.; Matsumoto, M.; Mishima, H.K. High frequency of open-angle glaucoma in Japanese patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2006, 246, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Helmer, C.; Malet, F.; Rougier, M.B.; Schweitzer, C.; Colin, J.; Delyfer, M.N.; Korobelnik, J.F.; Barberger-Gateau, P.; Dartigues, J.F.; Delcourt, C. Is there a link between open-angle glaucoma and dementia? The Three-City-Alienor cohort. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 74, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Park, D.Y.; Kim, M.; Bae, Y.; Jang, H.; Lim, D.H. Risk of Dementia in Newly Diagnosed Glaucoma: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Korea. Ophthalmology 2023, 130, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Umunakwe, O.; Gupta, D.; Tseng, H. Association of Open-Angle Glaucoma with Non-Alzheimer’s Dementia and Cognitive Impairment. Ophthalmol. Glaucoma 2020, 3, 460–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, X.H.; Zou, J.Y.; Geng, W.; Wang, A.Y. Association between glaucoma and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review of observational studies. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019, 97, 665–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kim, D.K.; Lee, S.Y. Could Mid- to Late-Onset Glaucoma Be Associated with an Increased Risk of Incident Dementia? A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study. J. Pers. Med. 2023, 13, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mullany, S.; Xiao, L.; Qassim, A.; Marshall, H.; Gharahkhani, P.; MacGregor, S.; Hassall, M.M.; Siggs, O.M.; Souzeau, E.; Craig, J.E. Normal-tension glaucoma is associated with cognitive impairment. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 106, 952–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cui, Q.N.; Green, D.; Jethi, M.; Driver, T.; Porco, T.C.; Kuo, J.; Lin, S.C.; Stamper, R.L.; Han, Y.; Chiu, C.S.; et al. Individuals with and without normal tension glaucoma exhibit comparable performance on tests of cognitive function. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 14, 1721–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kolli, A.; Kabeto, M.; McCammon, R.; Langa, K.M.; Ehrlich, J.R. Glaucoma and cognitive function trajectories in a population-based study: Findings from the health and retirement study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2022, 70, 2827–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. McCoskey, M.; Addis, V.; Goodyear, K.; Sankar, P.S.; Ying, G.S.; Yu, Y.; Salowe, R.; Cui, Q.N.; Miller-Ellis, E.; Maguire, M.; et al. Association between Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Cognitive Impairment as Measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Neurodegener. Dis. 2018, 18, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Owsley, C.; McGwin, G., Jr. Cautionary Remarks on Linking Cognitive Impairment to Glaucoma and Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Ophthalmology 2020, 127, 667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rossi, S.L.; Subramanian, P.; Bovenkamp, D.E. The future is precision medicine-guided diagnoses, preventions and treatments for neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2023, 15, 1128619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tielsch, J.M.; Sommer, A.; Katz, J.; Royall, R.M.; Quigley, H.A.; Javitt, J. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA 1991, 266, 369–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sommer, A.; Tielsch, J.M.; Katz, J.; Quigley, H.A.; Gottsch, J.D.; Javitt, J.C.; Martone, J.F.; Royall, R.M.; Witt, K.A.; Ezrine, S. Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991, 325, 1412–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wilson, R.; Richardson, T.M.; Hertzmark, E.; Grant, W.M. Race as a risk factor for progressive glaucomatous damage. Ann. Ophthalmol. 1985, 17, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Charlson, E.S.; Sankar, P.S.; Miller-Ellis, E.; Regina, M.; Fertig, R.; Salinas, J.; Pistilli, M.; Salowe, R.J.; Rhodes, A.L.; Merritt, W.T., 3rd; et al. The primary open-angle african american glaucoma genetics study: Baseline demographics. Ophthalmology 2015, 122, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nasreddine, Z.S.; Phillips, N.A.; Bedirian, V.; Charbonneau, S.; Whitehead, V.; Collin, I.; Cummings, J.L.; Chertkow, H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2005, 53, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Katz, M.J.; Wang, C.; Nester, C.O.; Derby, C.A.; Zimmerman, M.E.; Lipton, R.B.; Sliwinski, M.J.; Rabin, L.A. T-MoCA: A valid phone screen for cognitive impairment in diverse community samples. Alzheimers Dement. 2021, 13, e12144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chappelle, S.D.; Gigliotti, C.; Leger, G.C.; Peavy, G.M.; Jacobs, D.M.; Banks, S.J.; Little, E.A.; Galasko, D.; Salmon, D.P. Comparison of the telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) and Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) as screening tests for early Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2023, 19, 4599–4608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vidal, K.S.; Suemoto, C.K.; Moreno, A.B.; Duncan, B.; Schmidt, M.I.; Maestri, M.; Barreto, S.M.; Lotufo, P.A.; Bertola, L.; Bensenor, I.M.; et al. Association between cognitive performance and self-reported glaucoma in middle-aged and older adults: A cross-sectional analysis of ELSA-Brasil. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2020, 53, e10347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Julayanont, P.; Brousseau, M.; Chertkow, H.; Phillips, N.; Nasreddine, Z.S. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Memory Index Score (MoCA-MIS) as a predictor of conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2014, 62, 679–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cuellar-Partida, G.; Craig, J.E.; Burdon, K.P.; Wang, J.J.; Vote, B.J.; Souzeau, E.; McAllister, I.L.; Isaacs, T.; Lake, S.; Mackey, D.A.; et al. Assessment of polygenic effects links primary open-angle glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hu, C.C.; Ho, J.D.; Lin, H.C.; Kao, L.T. Association between open-angle glaucoma and neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A case-control study. Eye 2017, 31, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Rozzini, L.; Riva, M.; Ghilardi, N.; Facchinetti, P.; Forbice, E.; Semeraro, F.; Padovani, A. Cognitive dysfunction and age-related macular degeneration. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen. 2014, 29, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Le, J.T.; Agron, E.; Keenan, T.D.L.; Clemons, T.E.; Brenowitz, W.D.; Yaffe, K.; Chew, E.Y.; Group, A.R. Assessing bidirectional associations between cognitive impairment and late age-related macular degeneration in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2. Alzheimers Dement. 2022, 18, 1296–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Xu, Y.; Phu, J.; Aung, H.L.; Hesam-Shariati, N.; Keay, L.; Tully, P.J.; Booth, A.; Anderson, C.S.; Anstey, K.J.; Peters, R. Frequency of coexistent eye diseases and cognitive impairment or dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye 2023, 37, 3128–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Yoshikawa, T.; Obayashi, K.; Miyata, K.; Saeki, K.; Ogata, N. Lower Cognitive Function in Patients With Functionally and Structurally Severe Glaucoma: The LIGHT Study. J. Glaucoma 2021, 30, 882–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of POAG cases and controls.
Table 1. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of POAG cases and controls.
DemographicPOAG Case
(N = 13)
Healthy Control
(N = 20)
p-Value
Age, Mean (SD) 74.2 (10.35)73.9 (12.94)0.94
Gender, N (%)
Female8 (61.5%)15 (75.0%)0.41
Male5 (38.5%)5 (25.0%)
Level of Education, N (%)
Completed Graduate Degree0 (0.0%)2 (10.0%)0.10
Completed 4-Year Degree5 (38.5%)4 (20.0%)
Some College4 (30.8%)3 (15.0%)
Completed High School1 (7.7%)9 (45.0%)
Less Than High School3 (23.1%)2 (10.0%)
Diabetes, N (%)
No7 (53.8%)13 (65.0%)0.52
Yes6 (46.2%)7 (35.0%)
Hypertension, N (%)
No2 (15.4%)5 (25.0%)0.51
Yes11 (84.6%)15 (75.0%)
Smoking Status, N (%)
Current Smoker1 (7.7%)4 (20.0%)0.22
Former Smoker7 (53.8%)5 (25.0%)
Never Smoker5 (38.5%)11 (55.0%)
Table 2. Univariate analysis for associations between POAG status, demographics, and total T-MoCA.
Table 2. Univariate analysis for associations between POAG status, demographics, and total T-MoCA.
DemographicLevelT-MoCA Total Score:
Mean (SD)
p-Value
POAG statusCase15.46 (4.03)0.36
Control16.70 (3.54)
GenderFemale16.57 (3.74)0.42
Male15.40 (3.78)
EducationCompleted Graduate Degree18.50 (2.12)0.17
Completed 4-Year Degree18.22 (2.22)
Some College16.00 (4.83)
Completed High School15.40 (3.95)
Less Than High School13.60 (2.88)
DiabetesNo16.25 (4.15)0.94
Yes16.15 (3.13)
HypertensionNo17.57 (2.37)0.28
Yes15.85 (3.98)
Smoking statusCurrent Smoker17.20 (3.56)0.24
Former Smoker14.75 (4.31)
Never Smoker17.00 (3.16)
Table 3. Comparison of T-MoCA subsection domain scores between POAG cases and controls.
Table 3. Comparison of T-MoCA subsection domain scores between POAG cases and controls.
Category (Max)GroupMean (SD)Mean Difference (Case—Control) (95% CI)p-Value
Attention (6)Case4.38 (1.61)0.08 (−1.05, 1.22)0.88
Control4.30 (1.53)
Language (3)Case1.62 (0.87)0.02 (−0.72, 0.75)0.97
Control1.60 (1.10)
Abstraction (2)Case1.08 (0.86)−0.37 (−0.92, 0.18)0.18
Control1.45 (0.69)
Delayed Recall (5)Case2.31 (1.55)−1.09 (−2.20, 0.01)0.052
Control3.40 (1.50)
Memory Index Score (15)Case9.08 (4.31)−3.02 (−5.60, −0.44)0.02
Control12.10 (2.97)
Orientation (6)Case5.77 (0.44)0.42 (−0.23, 1.07)0.20
Control5.35 (1.09)
Table 4. Analysis of relationship between disease status and dementia diagnosis.
Table 4. Analysis of relationship between disease status and dementia diagnosis.
Disease StatusDementiap-Value
NoYesTotal
Case65 (92.86%)5 (7.14%)700.058
Control67 (100%)0 (0.00%)67
Total1325137
Table 5. Comparison of difference between POAG cases and controls on subsection domain scores in 2016–2017 and 2023.
Table 5. Comparison of difference between POAG cases and controls on subsection domain scores in 2016–2017 and 2023.
Category (Max)GroupMean Difference (Case—Control)p-Value
Attention (6)2016–2017−0.890.07
20230.08
Language (3)2016–20170.150.70
20230.02
Abstraction (2)2016–20170.150.17
2023−0.37
Delayed Recall (5)2016–2017−0.430.37
2023−1.09
Memory Index Score (15)2016–2017−1.640.44
2023−3.02
Orientation (6)2016–2017−0.100.13
20230.42
Table 6. RNFL correlation to T-MoCA scores in 2023 and over time.
Table 6. RNFL correlation to T-MoCA scores in 2023 and over time.
T-MoCA SectionCorrelation between RNFL Thickness and T-MoCA Score in 2023
Spearman Correlation Coefficient (p-Value)
Correlation between Change in RNFL Thickness and Change in T-MoCA Score Compared to the Mean over 2016 to 2023
Spearman Correlation Coefficient (p-Value)
Attention−0.01 (0.96)0.38 (0.22)
Language0.30 (0.31)0.34 (0.27)
Abstraction−0.37 (0.21)−0.43 (0.17)
Delayed Recall−0.03 (0.91)0.15 (0.64)
Memory Index Score−0.07 (0.82)0.42 (0.17)
Orientation0.20 (0.52)−0.12 (0.71)
Total0.07 (0.81)0.24 (0.45)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sapir, T.; Augello, P.; Lee, R.; McCoskey, M.; Salowe, R.; Addis, V.; Sankar, P.; Ying, G.-S.; O’Brien, J.M. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Is Associated with Short-Term Memory Decline and Dementia in Individuals of African Ancestry. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 4140. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144140

AMA Style

Sapir T, Augello P, Lee R, McCoskey M, Salowe R, Addis V, Sankar P, Ying G-S, O’Brien JM. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Is Associated with Short-Term Memory Decline and Dementia in Individuals of African Ancestry. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(14):4140. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sapir, Tzuriel, Patrick Augello, Roy Lee, Makayla McCoskey, Rebecca Salowe, Victoria Addis, Prithvi Sankar, Gui-Shuang Ying, and Joan M. O’Brien. 2024. "Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Is Associated with Short-Term Memory Decline and Dementia in Individuals of African Ancestry" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 14: 4140. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13144140

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop