Next Article in Journal
Impact of Accidental High or Low Implantation Depth on Peri-Procedural Outcomes after Implantation with the Self-Expanding ACURATE neo2
Previous Article in Journal
C4d Is an Independent Predictor of the Kidney Failure in Primary IgA Nephropathy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Is There Any Purpose in Routine Syndesmotic Screw Removal? Systematic Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Anatomical Posterior Acetabular Plate Versus Conventional Reconstruction Plates for Acetabular Posterior Wall Fractures: A Comparative Study

1
Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, 402 Taichung, Taiwan
2
Doctor Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, 402 Taichung, Taiwan
3
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, 500 Changhua, Taiwan
4
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, 704 Tainan, Taiwan
5
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tainan Sin Lau Hospital, 701 Tainan, Taiwan
6
Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, 704 Tainan, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5341; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175341
Submission received: 23 May 2024 / Revised: 3 September 2024 / Accepted: 6 September 2024 / Published: 9 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Acute Trauma and Trauma Care in Orthopedics)

Abstract

Background: Functional recovery following the surgical fixation of acetabular posterior wall fractures remains a challenge. This study compares outcomes of posterior wall fracture reconstruction using an anatomical posterior acetabular plate (APAP) versus conventional reconstruction plates. Methods: Forty patients with acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall or column underwent surgery, with 20 treated using APAPs (APAP group) and 20 with conventional pelvic reconstruction plates (control group). Baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative blood loss and time, reduction quality, postoperative function, and postoperative complications were compared using appropriate non-parametric statistical tests. A general linear model for repeated measures analysis of variance was employed to analyze trends in functional recovery. Results: No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics. APAP significantly reduced surgical time by 40 min (186.5 ± 51.0 versus 225.0 ± 47.7, p =0.004) and blood loss (695 ± 393 versus 930 ± 609, p = 0.049) compared to conventional plates. At 3 and 6 months following surgery, the APAP group exhibited higher functional scores (modified Merle d’Aubigné scores 10 ± 1.8 versus 7.8 ± 1.4, p < 0.001; 13.4 ± 2.8 versus 10.1 ± 2.1, p = 0.001), converging with the control group by 12 months (modified Merle d’Aubigné scores 14.2 ± 2.6 versus 12.7 ± 2.6, p = 0.072; OHS 31.6 ± 12.3 versus 30.3 ± 10.1, p = 0.398). Radiologically, the APAP group demonstrated superior outcomes (p = 0.047). Complication and conversion rates to hip arthroplasty did not significantly differ between groups (10% versus 15%, p = 0.633). Conclusion: The use of an APAP in reconstructing the posterior acetabulum significantly reduces surgical time, decreases intraoperative blood loss, and leads to earlier functional recovery compared to conventional reconstruction plates. The APAP provides stable fixation of the posterior wall and ensures the durable maintenance of reduction, ultimately yielding favorable surgical outcomes.
Keywords: acetabular fracture; posterior wall fracture; posterior column fracture; internal fixation; anatomical locking plate; plate osteosynthesis acetabular fracture; posterior wall fracture; posterior column fracture; internal fixation; anatomical locking plate; plate osteosynthesis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chuang, C.-H.; Chuang, H.-C.; Wang, J.-H.; Yang, J.-M.; Wu, P.-T.; Hu, M.-H.; Su, H.-L.; Lee, P.-Y. Anatomical Posterior Acetabular Plate Versus Conventional Reconstruction Plates for Acetabular Posterior Wall Fractures: A Comparative Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175341

AMA Style

Chuang C-H, Chuang H-C, Wang J-H, Yang J-M, Wu P-T, Hu M-H, Su H-L, Lee P-Y. Anatomical Posterior Acetabular Plate Versus Conventional Reconstruction Plates for Acetabular Posterior Wall Fractures: A Comparative Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(17):5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chuang, Chang-Han, Hao-Chun Chuang, Jou-Hua Wang, Jui-Ming Yang, Po-Ting Wu, Ming-Hsien Hu, Hong-Lin Su, and Pei-Yuan Lee. 2024. "Anatomical Posterior Acetabular Plate Versus Conventional Reconstruction Plates for Acetabular Posterior Wall Fractures: A Comparative Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 17: 5341. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop