Next Article in Journal
Effectiveness of Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea by Surgeries and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: Evaluation Using Objective Sleep Parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
MEG in MRI-Negative Patients with Focal Epilepsy
Previous Article in Special Issue
No Harmful Effect of Endovascular Treatment before Decompressive Surgery—Implications for Handling Patients with Space-Occupying Brain Infarction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Routine ICU Surveillance after Brain Tumor Surgery: Patient Selection Using Machine Learning

Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(19), 5747; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195747 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 16 August 2024 / Revised: 11 September 2024 / Accepted: 24 September 2024 / Published: 26 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurocritical Care: New Insights and Challenges)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Routine postoperative ICU admission following brain tumor surgery may not benefit selected patients. The objective of this study was to develop a risk prediction instrument for early (within 24 h) postoperative adverse events using machine learning techniques. Methods: Retrospective cohort of 1000 consecutive adult patients undergoing elective brain tumor resection. Nine events/interventions (CPR, reintubation, return to OR, mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, impaired consciousness, intracranial hypertension, swallowing disorders, and death) were chosen as target variables. Potential prognostic features (n = 27) from five categories were chosen and a gradient boosting algorithm (XGBoost) was trained and cross-validated in a 5 × 5 fashion. Prognostic performance, potential clinical impact, and relative feature importance were analyzed. Results: Adverse events requiring ICU intervention occurred in 9.2% of cases. Other events not requiring ICU treatment were more frequent (35% of cases). The boosted decision trees yielded a cross-validated ROC-AUC of 0.81 ± 0.02 (mean ± CI95) when using pre- and post-op data. Using only pre-op data (scheduling decisions), ROC-AUC was 0.76 ± 0.02. PR-AUC was 0.38 ± 0.04 and 0.27 ± 0.03 for pre- and post-op data, respectively, compared to a baseline value (random classifier) of 0.092. Targeting a NPV of at least 95% would require ICU admission in just 15% (pre- and post-op data) or 30% (only pre-op data) of cases when using the prediction algorithm. Conclusions: Adoption of a risk prediction instrument based on boosted trees can support decision-makers to optimize ICU resource utilization while maintaining adequate patient safety. This may lead to a relevant reduction in ICU admissions for surveillance purposes.
Keywords: craniotomy; complications; postoperative surveillance; ICU; machine learning craniotomy; complications; postoperative surveillance; ICU; machine learning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Neumann, J.-O.; Schmidt, S.; Nohman, A.; Naser, P.; Jakobs, M.; Unterberg, A. Routine ICU Surveillance after Brain Tumor Surgery: Patient Selection Using Machine Learning. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195747

AMA Style

Neumann J-O, Schmidt S, Nohman A, Naser P, Jakobs M, Unterberg A. Routine ICU Surveillance after Brain Tumor Surgery: Patient Selection Using Machine Learning. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(19):5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195747

Chicago/Turabian Style

Neumann, Jan-Oliver, Stephanie Schmidt, Amin Nohman, Paul Naser, Martin Jakobs, and Andreas Unterberg. 2024. "Routine ICU Surveillance after Brain Tumor Surgery: Patient Selection Using Machine Learning" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 19: 5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13195747

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop