Next Article in Journal
The Role of Helicobacter pylori and Metabolic Syndrome-Related Mast Cell Activation Pathologies and Their Potential Impact on Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison between Conventional and Digital Impressions for Determining Axes and Distances of Three Implants in Straight and Curved Lines: An In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Clinical Utility of Lower Extremity Dual-Energy CT Angiography in the Detection of Bone Marrow Edema in Diabetic Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: Technical Principles and Applications in the Assessment of Cardiovascular Diseases

by
Antonella Meloni
1,2,
Erica Maffei
3,
Alberto Clemente
2,
Carmelo De Gori
2,
Mariaelena Occhipinti
2,
Vicenzo Positano
1,2,
Sergio Berti
4,
Ludovico La Grutta
5,
Luca Saba
6,
Riccardo Cau
6,
Eduardo Bossone
7,
Cesare Mantini
8,
Carlo Cavaliere
3,
Bruna Punzo
3,
Simona Celi
9 and
Filippo Cademartiri
2,*
1
Bioengineering Unit, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 56124 Pisa, Italy
2
Department of Radiology, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 56124 Pisa, Italy
3
Department of Radiology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico SYNLAB SDN, 80131 Naples, Italy
4
Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiology Department, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 54100 Massa, Italy
5
Department of Radiology, University Hospital “P. Giaccone”, 90127 Palermo, Italy
6
Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cagliari, 09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy
7
Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Cardarelli, 80131 Naples, Italy
8
Department of Radiology, “G. D’Annunzio” University, 66100 Chieti, Italy
9
BioCardioLab, Fondazione G. Monasterio CNR-Regione Toscana, 54100 Massa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2359; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082359
Submission received: 16 March 2024 / Revised: 15 April 2024 / Accepted: 16 April 2024 / Published: 18 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dual-Energy and Spectral CT in Clinical Practice)

Abstract

:
Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography (SPCCT) represents a groundbreaking advancement in X-ray imaging technology. The core innovation of SPCCT lies in its photon-counting detectors, which can count the exact number of incoming x-ray photons and individually measure their energy. The first part of this review summarizes the key elements of SPCCT technology, such as energy binning, energy weighting, and material decomposition. Its energy-discriminating ability represents the key to the increase in the contrast between different tissues, the elimination of the electronic noise, and the correction of beam-hardening artifacts. Material decomposition provides valuable insights into specific elements’ composition, concentration, and distribution. The capability of SPCCT to operate in three or more energy regimes allows for the differentiation of several contrast agents, facilitating quantitative assessments of elements with specific energy thresholds within the diagnostic energy range. The second part of this review provides a brief overview of the applications of SPCCT in the assessment of various cardiovascular disease processes. SPCCT can support the study of myocardial blood perfusion and enable enhanced tissue characterization and the identification of contrast agents, in a manner that was previously unattainable.

1. Introduction

Computed tomography (CT) is a powerful diagnostic imaging tool that plays a crucial role in the detection, characterization, and monitoring of various medical conditions [1]. Conventional CT (single-energy) primarily focuses on delivering anatomical and morphological evaluations of tissues and organs, relying on a qualitative assessment of tissues in comparison to the surrounding structures [2]. The acquired images are contingent upon the selected energy level during the acquisition process. Spectral CT goes beyond conventional CT:—it acquires and analyzes data at multiple energy levels or wavelengths, enabling the differentiation of materials based on their unique energy-dependent attenuation characteristics [3,4]. The extraction of energy-dependent spectral information is called material decomposition and it provides detailed information about the composition of tissues, allowing for improved tissue characterization and enhancing diagnostic capabilities in several ways [5]. Moreover, spectral CT enables the accurate assessment of iodine concentration within tissues and the subtraction of iodine-specific information from contrast-enhanced images, allowing for a clearer visualization of anatomical structures and a better quality of anatomical images using mono-energetic reconstructions [4,6]. Mono-energetic reconstructions contribute to improved image sharpness and reduced artifacts, resulting in clearer and more diagnostically valuable representations [6,7]. The heightened level of detail offered using spectral CT facilitates a more nuanced understanding of anatomical structures and pathological conditions, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy and potentially opening new avenues for tailored therapeutic interventions.
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), which involves acquiring two datasets with different energy levels (typically high and low kVp), represents the first successful implementation of spectral CT. All the different available DECT platforms employ X-ray detectors that integrate the energy of incoming X-rays (energy-integrating detectors—EIDs) and, therefore, necessitate the integration of supplementary components or techniques, including additional beams, detectors, or filters, to achieve spectral separation [2,8,9,10].
Recently, the introduction of spectral photon-counting CT (SPCCT) has opened up new possibilities for spectral imaging. The core innovation of SPCCT lies in its photon-counting detectors (PCDs), which provide a unique methodology for acquiring and processing X-ray data. By counting individual photons and measuring their energy directly, PCDs surpass the capabilities of traditional energy-integrating detectors.
The objective of this narrative review, prepared in accordance with the indications provided in [11], is to summarize the basic technical principles and the benefits associated with SPCCT technology and to provide a brief but comprehensive overview of the applications of SPCCT in the assessment of different cardiovascular diseases.

2. Spectral Photon-Counting CT Technology

2.1. Technical Aspects

PCDs are constructed using semi-conductive materials, such as cadmium telluride, cadmium zinc telluride, or silicon [12], which possess the unique capability to directly convert incoming photons into electrical charges [13,14,15] (Figure 1). The application of an external voltage, typically ranging between 800 and 1000 V, between the cathode (located on the upper side) and the pixelated anode electrodes (situated on the lower side) creates a potent electric field within the detector. When an X-ray photon interacts with the detector material, it generates a charge cloud comprising electron-hole pairs. The charge clouds are propelled towards the pixelated anode electrodes by the electric field and induce short current pulses. An electronic pulse-shaping circuit is employed to amplify and transform the induced current pulses into voltage pulses [16]. The shaped electrical pulses have heights directly proportional to the energy of the absorbed X-rays. A “counter” mechanism is employed to quantify the pulses that exceed a predetermined energy threshold. PCDs employ multiple energy thresholds and perform a comparative analysis of all pulses, categorizing incident photons into distinct energy groups or bins [17]. This process enables the differentiation of X-ray photons based on their energy levels. In contemporary PCCT systems, the energy bins or channels typically range from 2 to 8. The choice of the number of energy bins can depend on the specific design and application of the PCCT system; the optimal number may vary for different imaging scenarios and clinical objectives.
EIDs are made of scintillator elements that convert X-rays into visible light [15,18,19]. This emitted light is subsequently detected by a photodiode array constructed from a semi-conducting material. This array produces an electrical signal that is directly proportional to the total deposited energy, which also includes electronic thermal noise. The electrical signal undergoes amplification and is subsequently converted into a digital signal, allowing for further processing in tomographic image reconstruction. It is important to note that, due to the integration of energy from all incident photons within a specific time interval, the detector loses any information regarding the energy of individual X-ray photons. Optically opaque partitions called septa are integrated between scintillating detector pixels, with the primary objective of preventing light cross-talk between these neighboring elements [19].

2.2. Benefits Associated with PCDs

The energy-resolving capabilities of PCDs offer several advantages over conventional EIDs, including the elimination of electronic noise, the improvement of contrast between different tissues, the correction of artifacts caused by beam hardening, and the possibility to perform multi-energy/multi-parametric imaging.

2.2.1. Improved Image Quality (Noise, Contrast, and Artifacts)

Different from EIDs, PCDs typically have an energy threshold, which is the minimum energy level required for an X-ray photon to be registered by the detector. The threshold is set to be approximately 20–25 keV, which is notably higher than the background noise level of the electronic system associated with the PCD. As a result, electronic noise does not significantly influence the count rates of the PCD [17]. The noise mitigation capabilities of PCDs contribute significantly to improved image quality, making them particularly valuable in situations requiring minimal radiation exposure and when imaging patients with larger body sizes, where image clarity and diagnostic accuracy can be challenging, due to increased attenuation [20,21].
PCDs apply uniform weighting to the counted X-ray quanta. Uniform weighting implies that all X-ray photons meeting the minimum energy requirement are treated equally regarding their contribution to the detector signal [16,22]. On the contrary, EIDs use linear weighting and low-energy photons make a diminished contribution to the overall detector signal. Since the information pertaining to the distinction between various materials is primarily focused within the lower range of X-ray energy, the PCD-CT technology presents an enhanced contrast and a superior contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) when compared to the conventional EID-CT. This superiority is particularly evident when imaging materials characterized by low X-ray attenuation, such as iodine [12,23,24,25]. The contrast discrepancy related to iodine between PCD-CT and EID-CT becomes more conspicuous at higher X-ray tube voltages. Importantly, in PCDs, the customization of the weighting scheme, which consists of assigning distinct weights to photons of varying energy levels, allows the optimization of the CNR for a specific material [16,26,27].
Beam-hardening artifacts represent one of the most common artifacts, caused by the increased attenuation of low-energy photons compared to high-energy photons [28]. This dissimilarity in attenuation results in distortions within the reconstructed CT images, manifested as streaking or shading artifacts [29]. PCDs effectively mitigate the impact of beam hardening through constant weighting, which allows the normalization of attenuation measurements across diverse energy levels [30,31]. In particular, PCDs demonstrate optimal immunity to beam-hardening effects when employing high-energy thresholds [13,20,32].
The remarkable improvement in imaging quality positions PCCT as a promising technique for pioneering new low-dose imaging protocols. The reduction in radiation dose is a critical factor in CT, as the potential risks associated with patient exposure to radiation must be carefully weighed against the necessity for high-quality diagnostic images. Indeed, several studies have proved the ability of PCCT to effectively retain a high level of image quality, while simultaneously reducing radiation dose [21,33,34,35].

2.2.2. Multi-Energy Acquisition

Material decomposition is one of the main mechanisms used in spectral CT. Material decomposition algorithms break down unknown tissues into specific materials, based on their unique X-ray attenuation characteristics at various energy levels. The number of materials or bases corresponds to the amount of spectral information that has been collected (N bases for N spectral data) and it can be augmented to N + 1 by applying mass or volume conservation restrictions [36], which may potentially introduce inaccuracies in the material decomposition process [37]. Material decomposition algorithms generate material-specific images, which can display and measure the presence of particular elements in a CT volume, and energy-selective images. Preselected materials (e.g., iodine, fat, and calcium) can be subtracted from material-specific images. The removal of the iodine leads to the generation of virtual non-contrast (VNC) images, which exhibit an image quality comparable to that of true non-contrast images [38,39] and potentially eliminate the need for a dedicated unenhanced acquisition, decreasing both radiation dose and scan time. On the other hand, iodine can be superimposed onto grayscale images with a color gradient, generating iodine maps that specifically highlight the distribution and concentration of iodine within the scanned area [40,41]. Energy-selective applications include virtual monochromatic images (VMIs), which emulate scans acquired at a single energy, described in terms of kiloelectronvolt [42,43,44]. Low-keV images enhance iodine contrast and lesion conspicuity, albeit with the trade-off of increased noise. Conversely, high-keV images exhibit less contrast but mitigate beam-hardening artifacts [6,45]. Images captured at intermediate energy (60–75 keV) offer balanced contrast and image noise and are ideal for the assessment of soft tissues [46].
By collecting data in two energy regimes, EIDs have the capability to distinguish up to three types of materials within the imaged area [36]. In addition, DECT is susceptible to spectral overlap, a factor that diminishes the accuracy of material decomposition. Conversely, PCDs, thanks to their ability to differentiate photons with different energies through pulse height analysis, have the potential to discriminate ≥3 materials accurately and to enable multi-energy spectral CT without spectral overlap [47]. Increasing the number of energy regimens in spectral CT leads to superior material-specific or weighted pictures, enabling a more accurate identification of the underlying tissue composition and unlocking new possibilities for diagnostic imaging [48,49].
The other important benefit associated with the use of multiple energy measurements in spectral CT is the possibility of adding additional materials to the spectral decomposition of the images based on their distinct K-edge energies. This approach, called K-edge imaging, relies on adjusting the acquisition energy thresholds to capture the target materials’ unique energy shifts at the K-edge [50]. K-edge imaging is a real breakthrough in CT imaging, providing opportunities for the use of non-iodine contrast agents, such as gold, silver, platinum, bismuth, and ytterbium [51,52,53,54], and for the development of new types of contrast agents, such as nanoparticles targeted to particular cells or enzymes [55,56,57,58]. These opportunities open a completely new CT approach for simultaneous multi-contrast agent imaging and functional and molecular imaging [59,60,61,62]. Multi-material imaging enables the determination of the precise distribution of different contrast agents administered simultaneously or to picture various contrast agents with distinct distribution properties at one time [19,22]. Molecular imaging provides detailed insights into the dynamic interactions and activities occurring within cells and molecules in real time, providing the in vivo characterization and measurement of biological processes not achievable with “classical” diagnostic imaging [55,56,57,58,63].

2.2.3. Enhanced Spatial Resolution

In addition to their spectral imaging capacities, PCDs provide enhanced spatial resolution compared to EIDs. Indeed, in EIDs, the need to mitigate the impact of signal loss arising from the “dead zones” represented by the septa, which cannot be made excessively thin, imposes constraints on the smallest achievable size of the active detector elements. In PCDs, the elimination of non-responsive areas between pixels enables a reduction in pixel size, without compromising geometric efficiency [16]. The pixel pitch can be refined to values as small as 0.15–0.225 mm at the isocenter [64,65,66,67].

2.3. Current Challenges of PCCT

2.3.1. Technical Challenges

Current technical challenges of PCDs include cross-talk effects (k-escape, charge-sharing, or fluorescence) and pulse pile-up, which can affect the accurate determination of the energy of the incident photons [18,68].
Charge sharing occurs when the charge cloud arrives close to the border between two pixels and is captured and registered by multiple adjacent pixel electrodes [50,69]. This unintended sharing of the signal can result in a misallocation of the signal, as it may be mistakenly attributed to multiple pixels rather than being precisely assigned to a single pixel, introducing inaccuracies in determining the location and energy of the incident radiation [70]. Compton scattering and fluorescence involve the emission of secondary photons, after the interaction of an incident photon with the detector. Rather than being confined to a single pixel, these secondary photons tend to be detected in neighboring pixels, giving rise to situations where multiple events jointly share the overall energy of the incident photon [17]. The likelihood of K-fluorescence and Compton scattering is influenced by the material composition of the detectors: K-fluorescence is more accentuated in detectors characterized by higher atomic numbers, such as cadmium telluride, and Compton scattering is more accentuated in detectors made of silicon [19]. These effects introduce various challenges, encompassing inaccuracies in energy assignment to individual pixels, potential undercounts or overcounts, compromised spatial resolution due to the dispersion of counts among adjacent pixels, and associations between energy bins in different pixels [50]. Charge sharing and cross-talk from secondary photons become more likely as pixel size diminishes and, consequently, limit the attainable minimum size of pixels in PCDs.
Pulse pile-up effects manifest when numerous photons interact with the detector in a very short time span, preventing the detector from distinguishing individual events. This leads to the incorrect registration of multiple low-energy charges as a single high-energy photon [71,72]. The errors introduced in photon counting and energy measurement have the potential to distort energy spectra and compromise image quality. Mitigating pulse pile-up can be achieved by decreasing the pixel size of the detector, consequently decreasing the number of incident photons per detector channel. Anyway, the influence of pulse pile-up is generally negligible under the usual X-ray flux rates encountered in clinical CT imaging [73].

2.3.2. Alternative to Iodine-Based Contrast Agents

Some clinical applications of PCCT require the use of an alternative to iodine-based contrast agents [55,58]. Alternative contrast agents offer advantages such as improved tissue differentiation, better visualization of specific pathologies, or reduced risks for patients with contraindications to the administration of iodinated contrast media.
Gadolinium-based contrast agents, used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can also be used for diagnostic CT angiography (CTA), as an alternative to iodinated contrast materials [74]. However, there are some limitations to using gadolinium in CTA, including the lower vascular contrast attenuation compared to conventional CTA using an iodinated contrast, which can make it more challenging to visualize certain details, and the requirement of high doses of gadolinium [74,75]. Compared to MRI, CT requires a significantly increased dosage of gadolinium to achieve adequate contrast enhancement and this could have implications for safety and cost considerations.
Heavy elements like gold and bismuth have been employed as contrast agents in preclinical and experimental settings [53,55,76,77], but their safety profiles for human use are still under investigation and regulatory scrutiny.

3. Cardiovascular Applications

3.1. Coronary Artery Assessment

Coronary CT has emerged as the primary diagnostic tool for investigating coronary pathologies, recommended as the first-line examination [78]. However, persistent challenges exist in accurately assessing the coronary lumen in the presence of heavily calcified plaques or small stents and in analyzing plaque components.
The presence of severe calcification can lead to blooming artifacts in traditional imaging, potentially rendering examinations inconclusive or resulting in an overestimation of stenosis [79]. In this scenario, the PCCT’s ability to mitigate blooming artifacts has been proved particularly beneficial. In the phantom study by Koons et al., replicating coronary arteries containing calcifications of varied sizes and shapes, PCCT offered improved visualization of calcium plaques and a clearer depiction of the patent lumen compared with conventional CT at an equivalent dose [80]. Additionally, in the case of a ring-shaped plaque inducing a substantial 75% reduction in the vessel’s cross-sectional area, only images generated using PCCT could discern the presence of iodine within the lumen, underscoring the distinctive capability of PCCT in detecting partial blockages that might go unnoticed using conventional CT. Si-Mohamed et al. confirmed, in their in vivo study (14 patients), that the mitigation of blooming artifacts achieved using PCCT resulted in an improved estimation of lumen permeability [81]. Li et al. presented an innovative methodology employing the material decomposition of multiple-energy CT images to quantify the percentage of stenosis [82]. The phantom experiments demonstrated that the four-threshold PCCT approach was more effective in reducing estimation errors than DECT and two-threshold PCCT, especially in the presence of dense calcifications. Furthermore, employing a three basis material decomposition model on the four-threshold PCCT images led to the creation of distinct maps illustrating the distribution of calcium, iodine, and water, enhancing the specificity of material identification and providing valuable insights into the composition of the imaged structures.
Although CT is a useful non-invasive imaging technique for patient follow-up after coronary artery stent implantation, the presence of blooming artifacts arising from stent struts, attributed to partial volume averaging and beam hardening, poses challenges in accurately evaluating the stent lumen and identifying in-stent patency and in-stent restenosis (ISR) [83]. The in vitro comparative study by Mannil et al. demonstrated that, when compared to traditional CT using the same imaging parameters, PCCT acquisitions offered several benefits, such as improved stent lumen clarity, lower noise, less blooming artifacts, and a better overall image quality [84]. Moreover, a superior visualization of the coronary stent lumen and a decrease in metal blooming artifacts have been demonstrated for UHR PCCT, in comparison to standard-resolution PCCT and conventional EID-CT by several independent studies [85,86,87,88,89]. Feuerlein et al. examined a complex scenario in which a PCCT system with six energy thresholds was used to scan a phantom that resembled a low-density calcified plaque inside a coronary metal stent and showed attenuation similar to that of the gadolinium-filled vascular lumen [90]. Gadolinium K-edge imaging made it possible to distinguish between intravascular gadolinium-based contrast agent, calcified plaque, and stent material, as well as to successfully reduce beam-hardening artifacts. The advantages of PCCT in terms of reduction in blooming artifacts and accurate visualization of both the stent and the coronary lumen have also been confirmed in vivo [81,91,92]. The in vitro study of Bratke et al. demonstrated the benefits of PCCT for the non-invasive detection of ISR [93]. Both conventional CT and PCCT were able to identify the soft-plaque-like stenoses inserted into the coronary stents embedded in a contrast-filled vessel phantom. However, with PCCT, it was possible to accurately define the residual lumen for seven stents, something that was never possible with traditional CT. The enhanced capabilities of PCCT should lead to a reduction in the need for invasive coronary angiography, especially in cases involving heavily calcified coronary arteries and small stents. Figure 2 shows a PCCT example of significant in-stent restenosis causing a perfusion deficit.
The coronary artery calcium (CAC) score serves as a robust indicator of atherosclerotic burden and as a consistent and reproducible means of assessing risk for major cardiovascular outcomes [94,95]. The Agatston method [96], calcium volume determination [97], and calcium mass score determination [97] are the three primary approaches for quantifying the CAC score, with the Agatston score being the most commonly utilized. PCDs have shown promise in improving the accuracy of CAC score quantification, which, in conventional CT scanners, is affected by partial volume effects that impair the identification of thin calcifications, leading to an underestimation of the CAC burden, and blooming artifacts that cause an overestimation of the CAC burden. First, phantom studies demonstrated the PCCT’s enhanced capabilities in the detection and characterization of small or subtle calcifications, compared to conventional CT systems [98,99]. Of note, it has been shown that monoenergetic reconstructions on PCCT can accurately evaluate the CAC and that there is a decline in the CAC score when QIR strength increases and monoenergetic levels rise [100]. In an ex vivo study using cadaveric hearts, Agatston scores from PCCT and conventional CT were found to have a strong correlation and agreement, as well as a good inter-scan reproducibility [101]. Another comparative ex vivo study showed the capability of UHR PCCT to reduce calcium blooming artifacts and to increase the accuracy of CAC quantification, significantly reducing the mean absolute percent error of volume estimations, in comparison to traditional CT [102]. Importantly, PCCT has been proved able to successfully maintain a high degree of sensitivity in CAC detection, while concurrently lowering radiation dose [103,104,105,106]. The reduction in the risks associated with the ionizing radiation exposure may open the way for the implementation of the CAC screening in asymptomatic individuals for the detection of occult coronary artery disease.
Since PCCT has inherent spectrum capabilities, it can reconstruct images without the iodinated contrast signal, eliminating the necessity for an unenhanced scan and, thus, reducing the patient’s overall radiation dose burden. Emrich et al. evaluated the precision in CAC scoring of a new virtual non-iodine (VNI) reconstruction technique called PureCalcium, in comparison with virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions and true non-contrast (TNC) acquisitions [107]. A good agreement between the TNC and PureCalcium approaches was demonstrated in the phantom setting; the in vivo investigation with 67 patients showed that the use of PureCalcium reconstructions, as opposed to VNC reconstructions, significantly increased the accuracy of CAC score categorization and the precision of CAC quantification. According to a recent phantom study assessing the impact of cardiac motion, Agatston scores derived from VNI were less affected by the presence of cardiac motion, and VNI reconstructions consistently exhibited superior performance compared to VNC reconstructions for all heart rates, leading to a lower underestimation of CAC scores compared to the actual calcium mass [108].
Although CAC scoring is a surrogate marker of the atherosclerotic plaque burden, it is not useful in identifying a vulnerable plaque [109]. The vulnerable or high-risk plaques are those plaques more susceptible to rupture leading to vascular thrombosis, which is considered to be the principal mechanism that accounts for acute myocardial infarctions or sudden coronary deaths [110]. Unstable plaques differ from stable lesions and are associated with a large necrotic core, a thin fibrous cap (less than 65 μm), inflammation (prevalently in the form of macrophage infiltration), angiogenesis, plaque hemorrhage, microcalcification, and positive remodeling determining luminal stenosis of <75% [111]. It has, therefore, been suggested that taking into account both plaque burden and type may improve atherosclerosis imaging and risk prediction [112,113,114,115]. Broadly, imaging assessments of plaque type can be divided into anatomic evaluations of plaque composition and molecular data regarding disease activity.
Conventional EID-based CT, coupled with sophisticated segmentation software, can help distinguish various components of coronary artery plaques based on their X-ray attenuation properties. This may include identifying features such as calcified plaques, non-calcified plaques, and mixed plaques [116,117]. However, using standard CT imaging, non-calcified plaque components, such as fibrous and fatty tissue, often exhibit substantial overlap in their density profiles, making it challenging to differentiate them accurately, and the partial volume effect makes quantitative measurements challenging [118]. Moreover, coronary plaques are usually composed of three to four materials and current algorithms cannot decompose a mixture of four materials. SPCCT can address these challenges. The performances of PCCT and traditional EID-CT were compared in an in vitro study by Rotzinger et al., where three distinct patient sizes (small, medium, and large) were simulated [119]. Thanks to its lower noise and increased spatial resolution, PCCT allowed for the improved recognition of simulated non-calcified and lipid-rich coronary plaques in all scenarios. In the study by Bouseel et al., 10 calcified and 13 lipid-rich non-calcified plaques from post-mortem human coronary arteries were scanned using PCCT [120]. Through the analysis of the dissimilarities in spectral attenuation and the iodine-based contrast agent concentration, PCCT allowed for the clear identification of normal arterial walls, lipid-rich plaques, calcified regions, and adjacent adipose tissue. The in vivo study of Mergen et al. confirmed the accuracy of coronary plaque extraction from SPCCT images [121]. In particular, the use of the ultra-high-resolution mode enabled a significant reduction in blooming artifacts, with a consequent enhanced visualization of non-calcified plaque constituents [121]. In a study involving a cohort of 51 patients, Vattay and colleagues investigated the impact of VMIs derived from PCCT on attenuation values and the corresponding volumes of plaque components [122]. In comparison with polychromatic images at 120 kVp used as a reference, a higher degree of similarity was observed when employing higher VMI levels (100–180 keV) for non-calcified plaque volumes, 70 keV for calcified plaque volumes, and low-energy images (40–50 keV) for lipid-rich atheromatous plaque volumes.
Disease activity (inflammation and neovascularization) in coronary plaque can be assessed using molecular imaging techniques. Preliminary phantom and animal studies have demonstrated the potential of SPCCT, using K-edge imaging in combination with gold nanoparticles, to provide important physiological data at the molecular and cellular levels. The study by Cormode et al. was the first to demonstrate, on a variety of phantoms and apo E-KO mice models of atherosclerosis, the ability of PCCT to differentiate in an accurate way among a gold nanoparticle contrast agent specific for macrophages, an iodine-based contrast agent, and calcified tissue [56]. The study conducted by Si-Mohamed and colleagues on atherosclerotic and control New Zealand white rabbits, scanned both before and two days after administering gold nanoparticles, revealed an enhanced correlation between gold concentration and macrophages when employing PCCT compared to traditional CT acquisitions (0.82 vs. 0.41) [64]. Moreover, the differentiation between the enhancement of the inner lumen with an iodinated contrast agent and the enhancement of the vessel wall with gold nanoparticles, validated through transmission electron microscopy and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry, was achieved solely using PCCT utilizing gold K-edge imaging.

3.2. Myocardial Perfusion

One of the most interesting capabilities of spectral CT is the use of the different absorption characteristics of the iodinated contrast at different kV levels to create a myocardial iodine map. Since myocardial iodine concentration has the potential to be a useful surrogate marker for myocardial perfusion, the quantification of the myocardial blood pool can be performed based on the amount of iodine per voxel [123]. Iodine distribution is commonly displayed using a color-coded map, which reflects the iodine distribution across all myocardial segments, according to the American Heart Association (AHA) model. Subsequently, the relative normalized myocardial attenuation density and the TPR (Tissue Perfusion Ratio) can be derived from these maps. DECT myocardial perfusion studies conducted under rest and stress protocols have demonstrated good accuracy compared to diverse reference modalities [124,125,126,127].
Figure 3 and Figure 4 show SPCCT examples of left ventricular ischemia.
A phantom study demonstrated a good accuracy of PCCT, in terms of iodine quantification in iodine maps and of generation of CT numbers in virtual monochromatic images [43].
In a recent case report involving a 61-year-old male presenting with acute chest symptoms, dual-energy-derived iodine maps from PCCT showed a diminished iodine concentration in the midventricular inferolateral wall [128]. This observation suggested an insufficient blood supply to that region and was confirmed using CMR, which depicted a small ischemic transmural scar in the same area.

3.3. Myocardial Tissue Characterization

Changes in tissue composition are a hallmark of various diseases affecting the myocardium. These alterations include the development of myocardial fibrosis, the existence of edema, or the infiltration of iron, fat, or amyloid into the heart.
There are two primary forms of myocardial fibrosis—interstitial fibrosis and replacement fibrosis.
The interstitial (diffuse) fibrosis involves the abnormal accumulation of collagen and other extracellular matrix components in the interstitial space, due to non-ischemic or infiltrative cardiomyopathies [129]. The quantification of myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) provides a non-invasive means to measure the proportion of extracellular matrix present in the whole myocardium and is, therefore, employed as a surrogate marker of interstitial fibrosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is widely recognized as the “gold standard” for non-invasive ECV assessment, but ECV quantification with CT has recently emerged as a robust and reliable alternative [130,131]. Compared to CMR, the main advantages of CT are the lower cost, the wider availability, the fast scanning speed, the possibility to generate volumetric 3-dimensional image data with high resolution and isotropic voxels, and the increased image quality and readability in patients with metal implants or devices [132]. The ECV quantification relies on determining the ratio between the concentration of the contrast medium (gadolinium in CMR and iodine in CT) in the myocardium and the plasma portion of the blood pool. In conventional EIDs, two distinct methods are currently used to quantify ECV. The single-energy or subtraction approach requires the acquisition of pre-contrast or non-enhanced images and late enhancement (LE) images, obtained 3 to 5 min after the contrast administration [133]. The differences in Hounsfeld units (∆HU) between the pre- and the post-contrast acquisitions are used to assess the distribution of the contrast medium by using the formula ECV = (1 − Hematocrit) * (∆HUmyocardium/∆HUbloodpool) [134]. Validation of this approach against both CMR and histopathology has been performed [135,136]. In dual-energy CT, the spectral separation of LE scans acquired simultaneously with two different kV and mA settings allows for material decomposition. The iodine distribution equilibrium in the myocardium and blood pool after contrast can be directly quantified on iodine maps obtained from the late enhancement scans [137]. The ECV calculation formula used for spectral imaging acquisition is: ECV = (1 − Hematocrit) * (Iodinemyocardium/Iodinebloodpool). This method obviates the need for a non-enhanced acquisition and is free of issues connected to misregistration during the manual tracing of the regions of interest [138]. A good agreement has been demonstrated between ECV quantified with DECT and CMR, although DECT tends to a slight overestimation [139,140]. The study by Mergen et al. was the first to demonstrate, in vivo, the feasibility of ECV quantification with PCCT at a low radiation dose [141]. In a cohort of 30 patients with severe aortic stenosis, the single-energy- and the dual-energy-derived ECV measurements showed a strong correlation (r = 0.87, p < 0.001), with a small mean difference of 0.9% and narrow limits of agreement. The average body mass index of the study population was 28 ± 5 kg/m2 and the median radiation dose for the LE scan was 1.2 mSv. This radiation dose is considerably lower than that one reported in recent studies where the ECV quantification was performed using an EID-CT system—4.7 mSv [142] or 5.2 mSv [138]. The study by Aquino et al., involving 29 patients scanned with PCCT, confirmed the strong association between dual- and single-energy-based ECV measurements (r = 0.91, p < 0.001) and demonstrated that the dual-energy approach offers the potential to reduce radiation exposure by 40% [143]. Importantly, compared to CMR, both the subtraction and spectral methods showed a robust correlation and a high reliability for ECV quantification.
Replacement (scar) fibrosis usually develops in the later stages of the disease following irreversible myocyte death or damage. Myocardial delayed enhancement CT has shown promise in the evaluation of myocardial scar tissue [144]. Figure 5 shows an SPCCT example of chronic post-infarction cardiomyopathy of the left ventricle. However, late gadolinium enhancement CMR remains the reference standard modality for this purpose, thanks to the increased CNR and the ability to clearly differentiate between healthy myocardium and scar tissue [145]. In a canine model of myocardial infarction, Symons et al. showed that PCCT could distinguish between the two administered contrast agents (iodine and gadolinium-based) with great clarity [60]. The integration of gadolinium, iodine, and soft tissue maps enabled the authors to achieve an excellent contrast between infarcted myocardium, remote myocardium, and LV blood pool. The comparison of PCCT results with histology and CMR confirmed that the scar tissue was accurately delineated.

3.4. Epicardial and Pericoronary Fat

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is the fat deposit between the myocardium and the visceral layer of the pericardium. Pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) specifically refers to the adipose tissue surrounding the coronary arteries. These fat depots are metabolically active and have been linked to coronary artery disease and the development of high-risk plaque [146,147,148,149,150]. Moreover, the PCAT has emerged as a marker of vascular inflammation with significant prognostic value [151]. The changes in adipose tissue composition can be evaluated from standard CT images using different approaches, including quantifying the thickness, volume, and attenuation of the adipose tissue [152].
The in vivo study conducted by Risch et al. showed that the use of VNC reconstructions derived from PCCT datasets provided a reliable method for assessing EAT volume, exhibiting a strong correlation and only minor differences when compared to traditional TNC reconstructions and offering the additional advantage of a significant decrease in the patient’s radiation dose [153]. Moreover, the calcium-preserving algorithm developed in the study demonstrated better and more uniform outcomes in estimating EAT volume when compared with the conventional algorithm.
Mergen and his team investigated the influence of monoenergetic energy levels on PCAT measurements in a cohort of 30 patients scanned with a first-generation whole-body PCCT system [154]. They found that, as the energy level increased, there was an increase in the PCAT mass attenuation surrounding the right coronary artery, left anterior descending artery, and circumflex artery, as well as a reduction in the mean attenuation difference between unenhanced and contrast-enhanced scans.

3.5. Radiomics

Radiomics is a quantitative approach to medical imaging, operating under the assumption that biomedical images contain intricate information regarding disease-specific mechanisms, which are imperceptible to human eyes and cannot be accessed through conventional visual examination. It involves the high-throughput extraction and analysis of a vast array of quantitative features, including textural information [155]. Since extracting reliable and insightful texture features relies on requisites such as optimal spatial resolution and SNR [156], PCCT offers the potential to improve radiomic analyses based on CT imaging data.
Ayx et al. compared PCCT and conventional CT of radiomics features extracted from the human heart [157]. A good similarity was found in first-order radiomics features depicting fundamental statistical properties of image intensity. In contrast, higher-order radiomics features, which capture more intricate patterns and relationships within the images, exhibited notable differences. In another in vivo study including 30 patients, the same group examined the myocardial changes linked to CAC score using a PCCT dataset [158]. The differentiation between patients with and without coronary artery calcification was achievable using four distinct radiomics-based textural characteristics. Furthermore, the direct relationship between the increase in complexity of the texture feature and the increase in Agatston score suggested that the myocardial texture becomes more heterogeneous and exhibits a higher variance in its structural patterns, as the calcification burden increases.
In the study conducted by Dunning et al., 19 patients underwent CCTA, using PCCT and VMIs at 50 keV, 70 keV, and 100 keV, and the reconstruction of VNC images and iodine maps was performed [159]. A comprehensive set of 93 radiomic features was extracted from each image and was subsequently compared between low- and high-risk plaques identified by an expert radiologist. The VMIs at 100 keV and the VNC images exhibited the highest accuracy in classifying coronary plaque risk, due to the reduced presence of iodine and calcium in these images.

4. Conclusions

Spectral photon-counting computed tomography holds tremendous potential for revolutionizing cardiovascular imaging and improving patient care and outcomes, by providing detailed and high-quality diagnostic information and offering unprecedented opportunities for the identification, characterization, and staging of cardiovascular diseases.
Although the number of publications describing the clinical applications of SPCCT is rapidly growing, they remain limited. Moreover, the existing studies primarily featured small sample sizes and did not perform a longitudinal follow-up analysis assessing the added value of PCCT compared to conventional CT in terms of prognosis and risk stratification. The wider adoption and the conduct of large cross-sectional and prospective clinical studies represent the key to fully realizing the potential of this transformative technology in clinical practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and F.C.; Investigation, A.M., E.M., A.C., C.D.G., M.O., V.P., L.L.G., L.S., R.C., E.B., C.M., C.C., B.P., S.C., and F.C.; Resources, S.B.; Visualization, A.M. and F.C.; Supervision, E.M. and F.C.; writing—original draft, A.M.; writing—review and editing, E.M., A.C., C.D.G., M.O., V.P., S.B., L.L.G., L.S., R.C., E.B., C.M., C.C., B.P., S.C., and F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

An informed consent for publication was obtained from all patients whose images were included in this review.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all patients for their cooperation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hussain, S.; Mubeen, I.; Ullah, N.; Shah, S.; Khan, B.A.; Zahoor, M.; Ullah, R.; Khan, F.A.; Sultan, M.A. Modern Diagnostic Imaging Technique Applications and Risk Factors in the Medical Field: A Review. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022, 2022, 5164970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dell, S.; Ascione, R.; De Giorgi, M.; De Lucia, D.R.; Cuocolo, R.; Boccalatte, M.; Sibilio, G.; Napolitano, G.; Muscogiuri, G.; Sironi, S.; et al. Dual-Energy CT of the Heart: A Review. J. Imaging 2022, 8, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Adam, S.Z.; Rabinowich, A.; Kessner, R.; Blachar, A. Spectral CT of the abdomen: Where are we now? Insights Into Imaging 2021, 12, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Rajiah, P.; Abbara, S.; Halliburton, S.S. Spectral detector CT for cardiovascular applications. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2017, 23, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patino, M.; Prochowski, A.; Agrawal, M.D.; Simeone, F.J.; Gupta, R.; Hahn, P.F.; Sahani, D.V. Material Separation Using Dual-Energy CT: Current and Emerging Applications. Radiographics 2016, 36, 1087–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Greffier, J.; Villani, N.; Defez, D.; Dabli, D.; Si-Mohamed, S. Spectral CT imaging: Technical principles of dual-energy CT and multi-energy photon-counting CT. Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2023, 104, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. D’Angelo, T.; Cicero, G.; Mazziotti, S.; Ascenti, G.; Albrecht, M.H.; Martin, S.S.; Othman, A.E.; Vogl, T.J.; Wichmann, J.L. Dual energy computed tomography virtual monoenergetic imaging: Technique and clinical applications. Br. J. Radiol. 2019, 92, 20180546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Agostini, A.; Borgheresi, A.; Mari, A.; Floridi, C.; Bruno, F.; Carotti, M.; Schicchi, N.; Barile, A.; Maggi, S.; Giovagnoni, A. Dual-energy CT: Theoretical principles and clinical applications. Radiol. Med. 2019, 124, 1281–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Johnson, T.R. Dual-energy CT: General principles. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2012, 199, S3–S8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tarkowski, P.; Czekajska-Chehab, E. Dual-Energy Heart CT: Beyond Better Angiography-Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Green, B.N.; Johnson, C.D.; Adams, A. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. J. Chiropr. Med. 2006, 5, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Iwanczyk, J.S.; Nygård, E.; Meirav, O.; Arenson, J.; Barber, W.C.; Hartsough, N.E.; Malakhov, N.; Wessel, J.C. Photon Counting Energy Dispersive Detector Arrays for X-ray Imaging. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2009, 56, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Leng, S.; Bruesewitz, M.; Tao, S.; Rajendran, K.; Halaweish, A.F.; Campeau, N.G.; Fletcher, J.G.; McCollough, C.H. Photon-counting Detector CT: System Design and Clinical Applications of an Emerging Technology. Radiographics 2019, 39, 729–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Esquivel, A.; Ferrero, A.; Mileto, A.; Baffour, F.; Horst, K.; Rajiah, P.S.; Inoue, A.; Leng, S.; McCollough, C.; Fletcher, J.G. Photon-Counting Detector CT: Key Points Radiologists Should Know. Korean J. Radiol. 2022, 23, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Meloni, A.; Cademartiri, F.; Positano, V.; Celi, S.; Berti, S.; Clemente, A.; La Grutta, L.; Saba, L.; Bossone, E.; Cavaliere, C.; et al. Cardiovascular Applications of Photon-Counting CT Technology: A Revolutionary New Diagnostic Step. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2023, 10, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Danielsson, M.; Persson, M.; Sjölin, M. Photon-counting x-ray detectors for CT. Phys. Med. Amp; Biol. 2021, 66, 03TR01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Taguchi, K.; Iwanczyk, J.S. Vision 20/20: Single photon counting x-ray detectors in medical imaging. Med. Phys. 2013, 40, 100901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kreisler, D.B. Photon counting Detectors: Concept, technical Challenges, and clinical outlook. Eur. J. Radiol. 2022, 149, 110229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Willemink, M.J.; Persson, M.; Pourmorteza, A.; Pelc, N.J.; Fleischmann, D. Photon-counting CT: Technical Principles and Clinical Prospects. Radiology 2018, 289, 293–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yu, Z.; Leng, S.; Kappler, S.; Hahn, K.; Li, Z.; Halaweish, A.F.; Henning, A.; McCollough, C.H. Noise performance of low-dose CT: Comparison between an energy integrating detector and a photon counting detector using a whole-body research photon counting CT scanner. J. Med. Imaging 2016, 3, 043503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Symons, R.; Cork, T.E.; Sahbaee, P.; Fuld, M.K.; Kappler, S.; Folio, L.R.; Bluemke, D.A.; Pourmorteza, A. Low-dose lung cancer screening with photon-counting CT: A feasibility study. Phys. Med. Biol. 2017, 62, 202–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sandfort, V.; Persson, M.; Pourmorteza, A.; Noël, P.B.; Fleischmann, D.; Willemink, M.J. Spectral photon-counting CT in cardiovascular imaging. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2021, 15, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shikhaliev, P.M. Energy-resolved computed tomography: First experimental results. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008, 53, 5595–5613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shikhaliev, P.M.; Fritz, S.G. Photon counting spectral CT versus conventional CT: Comparative evaluation for breast imaging application. Phys. Med. Biol. 2011, 56, 1905–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Silkwood, J.D.; Matthews, K.L.; Shikhaliev, P.M. Photon counting spectral breast CT: Effect of adaptive filtration on CT numbers, noise, and contrast to noise ratio. Med. Phys. 2013, 40, 051905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Giersch, J.; Niederlöhner, D.; Anton, G. The influence of energy weighting on X-ray imaging quality. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. [CrossRef]
  27. Schmidt, T.G. Optimal “image-based” weighting for energy-resolved CT. Med. Phys. 2009, 36, 3018–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Brooks, R.A.; Chiro, G.D. Beam hardening in X-ray reconstructive tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 1976, 21, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Barrett, J.F.; Keat, N. Artifacts in CT: Recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004, 24, 1679–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Lee, C.-L.; Park, J.; Nam, S.; Choi, J.; Choi, Y.; Lee, S.; Lee, K.-Y.; Cho, M. Metal artifact reduction and tumor detection using photon-counting multi-energy computed tomography. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shikhaliev, P.M. Beam hardening artefacts in computed tomography with photon counting, charge integrating and energy weighting detectors: A simulation study. Phys. Med. Biol. 2005, 50, 5813–5827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gutjahr, R.; Halaweish, A.F.; Yu, Z.; Leng, S.; Yu, L.; Li, Z.; Jorgensen, S.M.; Ritman, E.L.; Kappler, S.; McCollough, C.H. Human Imaging with Photon Counting-Based Computed Tomography at Clinical Dose Levels: Contrast-to-Noise Ratio and Cadaver Studies. Investig. Radiol. 2016, 51, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rajagopal, J.R.; Farhadi, F.; Solomon, J.; Sahbaee, P.; Saboury, B.; Pritchard, W.F.; Jones, E.C.; Samei, E. Comparison of Low Dose Performance of Photon-Counting and Energy Integrating CT. Acad. Radiol. 2021, 28, 1754–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Woeltjen, M.M.; Niehoff, J.H.; Michael, A.E.; Horstmeier, S.; Moenninghoff, C.; Borggrefe, J.; Kroeger, J.R. Low-Dose High-Resolution Photon-Counting CT of the Lung: Radiation Dose and Image Quality in the Clinical Routine. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Niehoff, J.H.; Carmichael, A.F.; Woeltjen, M.M.; Boriesosdick, J.; Schmidt, I.L.; Michael, A.E.; Hokamp, N.G.; Piechota, H.; Borggrefe, J.; Kroeger, J.R. Clinical Low Dose Photon Counting CT for the Detection of Urolithiasis: Evaluation of Image Quality and Radiation Dose. Tomography 2022, 8, 1666–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, X.; Yu, L.; Primak, A.N.; McCollough, C.H. Quantitative imaging of element composition and mass fraction using dual-energy CT: Three-material decomposition. Med. Phys. 2009, 36, 1602–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yveborg, M.; Danielsson, M.; Bornefalk, H. Theoretical comparison of a dual energy system and photon counting silicon detector used for material quantification in spectral CT. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2015, 34, 796–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jamali, S.; Michoux, N.; Coche, E.; Dragean, C.A. Virtual unenhanced phase with spectral dual-energy CT: Is it an alternative to conventional true unenhanced phase for abdominal tissues? Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2019, 100, 503–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ananthakrishnan, L.; Rajiah, P.; Ahn, R.; Rassouli, N.; Xi, Y.; Soesbe, T.C.; Lewis, M.A.; Lenkinski, R.E.; Leyendecker, J.R.; Abbara, S. Spectral detector CT-derived virtual non-contrast images: Comparison of attenuation values with unenhanced CT. Abdom. Radiol. 2017, 42, 702–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kim, H.; Park, C.M.; Kang, C.K.; Yoon, J.; Chae, K.J.; Goo, J.M. Effect of CT Acquisition Parameters on Iodine Density Measurement at Dual-Layer Spectral CT. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2018, 211, 748–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mergen, V.; Racine, D.; Jungblut, L.; Sartoretti, T.; Bickel, S.; Monnin, P.; Higashigaito, K.; Martini, K.; Alkadhi, H.; Euler, A. Virtual Noncontrast Abdominal Imaging with Photon-counting Detector CT. Radiology 2022, 305, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Symons, R.; Reich, D.S.; Bagheri, M.; Cork, T.E.; Krauss, B.; Ulzheimer, S.; Kappler, S.; Bluemke, D.A.; Pourmorteza, A. Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Vascular Imaging of the Head and Neck: First In Vivo Human Results. Investig. Radiol. 2018, 53, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Leng, S.; Zhou, W.; Yu, Z.; Halaweish, A.; Krauss, B.; Schmidt, B.; Yu, L.; Kappler, S.; McCollough, C. Spectral performance of a whole-body research photon counting detector CT: Quantitative accuracy in derived image sets. Phys. Med. Biol. 2017, 62, 7216–7232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Laukamp, K.R.; Lennartz, S.; Neuhaus, V.F.; Hokamp, N.G.; Rau, R.; Le Blanc, M.; Abdullayev, N.; Mpotsaris, A.; Maintz, D.; Borggrefe, J. CT metal artifacts in patients with total hip replacements: For artifact reduction monoenergetic reconstructions and post-processing algorithms are both efficient but not similar. Eur. Radiol. 2018, 28, 4524–4533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kulkarni, N.M.; Fung, A.; Kambadakone, A.R.; Yeh, B.M. Computed Tomography Techniques, Protocols, Advancements, and Future Directions in Liver Diseases. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 2021, 29, 305–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rassouli, N.; Chalian, H.; Rajiah, P.; Dhanantwari, A.; Landeras, L. Assessment of 70-keV virtual monoenergetic spectral images in abdominal CT imaging: A comparison study to conventional polychromatic 120-kVp images. Abdom. Radiol. 2017, 42, 2579–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kappler, S.; Henning, A.; Kreisler, B.; Schoeck, F.; Stierstorfer, K.; Flohr, T. Photon counting CT at elevated X-ray tube currents: Contrast stability, image noise and multi-energy performance. In Proceedings of the Medical Imaging 2014: Physics of Medical Imaging, SPIE, San Diego, CA, USA, 15–20 February 2014; Volume 9033. [Google Scholar]
  48. Faby, S.; Kuchenbecker, S.; Sawall, S.; Simons, D.; Schlemmer, H.P.; Lell, M.; Kachelrieß, M. Performance of today’s dual energy CT and future multi energy CT in virtual non-contrast imaging and in iodine quantification: A simulation study. Med. Phys. 2015, 42, 4349–4366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shikhaliev, P.M. Computed tomography with energy-resolved detection: A feasibility study. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008, 53, 1475–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nakamura, Y.; Higaki, T.; Kondo, S.; Kawashita, I.; Takahashi, I.; Awai, K. An introduction to photon-counting detector CT (PCD CT) for radiologists. Jpn. J. Radiol. 2022, 41, 266–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Schirra, C.O.; Brendel, B.; Anastasio, M.A.; Roessl, E. Spectral CT: A technology primer for contrast agent development. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2014, 9, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pan, D.; Schirra, C.O.; Senpan, A.; Schmieder, A.H.; Stacy, A.J.; Roessl, E.; Thran, A.; Wickline, S.A.; Proska, R.; Lanza, G.M. An early investigation of ytterbium nanocolloids for selective and quantitative “multicolor” spectral CT imaging. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 3364–3370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Müllner, M.; Schlattl, H.; Hoeschen, C.; Dietrich, O. Feasibility of spectral CT imaging for the detection of liver lesions with gold-based contrast agents—A simulation study. Phys. Med. 2015, 31, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kim, J.; Bar-Ness, D.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Coulon, P.; Blevis, I.; Douek, P.; Cormode, D.P. Assessment of candidate elements for development of spectral photon-counting CT specific contrast agents. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 12119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Si-Mohamed, S.; Cormode, D.P.; Bar-Ness, D.; Sigovan, M.; Naha, P.C.; Langlois, J.-B.; Chalabreysse, L.; Coulon, P.; Blevis, I.; Roessl, E.; et al. Evaluation of spectral photon counting computed tomography K-edge imaging for determination of gold nanoparticle biodistribution in vivo. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 18246–18257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cormode, D.P.; Roessl, E.; Thran, A.; Skajaa, T.; Gordon, R.E.; Schlomka, J.P.; Fuster, V.; Fisher, E.A.; Mulder, W.J.; Proksa, R.; et al. Atherosclerotic plaque composition: Analysis with multicolor CT and targeted gold nanoparticles. Radiology 2010, 256, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Balegamire, J.; Vandamme, M.; Chereul, E.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Maache, S.A.; Almouazen, E.; Ettouati, L.; Fessi, H.; Boussel, L.; Douek, P.; et al. Iodinated polymer nanoparticles as contrast agent for spectral photon counting computed tomography. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 5715–5728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Dong, Y.C.; Kumar, A.; Rosario-Berríos, D.N.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Hsu, J.C.; Nieves, L.M.; Douek, P.; Noël, P.B.; Cormode, D.P. Ytterbium Nanoparticle Contrast Agents for Conventional and Spectral Photon-Counting CT and Their Applications for Hydrogel Imaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 39274–39284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Muenzel, D.; Daerr, H.; Proksa, R.; Fingerle, A.A.; Kopp, F.K.; Douek, P.; Herzen, J.; Pfeiffer, F.; Rummeny, E.J.; Noël, P.B. Simultaneous dual-contrast multi-phase liver imaging using spectral photon-counting computed tomography: A proof-of-concept study. Eur. Radiol. Exp. 2017, 1, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Symons, R.; Cork, T.E.; Lakshmanan, M.N.; Evers, R.; Davies-Venn, C.; Rice, K.A.; Thomas, M.L.; Liu, C.Y.; Kappler, S.; Ulzheimer, S.; et al. Dual-contrast agent photon-counting computed tomography of the heart: Initial experience. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2017, 33, 1253–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Cormode, D.P.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Bar-Ness, D.; Sigovan, M.; Naha, P.C.; Balegamire, J.; Lavenne, F.; Coulon, P.; Roessl, E.; Bartels, M.; et al. Multicolor spectral photon-counting computed tomography: In vivo dual contrast imaging with a high count rate scanner. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Symons, R.; Krauss, B.; Sahbaee, P.; Cork, T.E.; Lakshmanan, M.N.; Bluemke, D.A.; Pourmorteza, A. Photon-counting CT for simultaneous imaging of multiple contrast agents in the abdomen: An in vivo study. Med. Phys. 2017, 44, 5120–5127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chen, Z.-Y.; Wang, Y.-X.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, J.-S.; Yang, F.; Zhou, Q.-L.; Liao, Y.-Y. Advance of Molecular Imaging Technology and Targeted Imaging Agent in Imaging and Therapy. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 819324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Si-Mohamed, S.A.; Sigovan, M.; Hsu, J.C.; Tatard-Leitman, V.; Chalabreysse, L.; Naha, P.C.; Garrivier, T.; Dessouky, R.; Carnaru, M.; Boussel, L.; et al. In Vivo Molecular K-Edge Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Using Photon-counting CT. Radiology 2021, 300, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Leng, S.; Rajendran, K.; Gong, H.; Zhou, W.; Halaweish, A.F.; Henning, A.; Kappler, S.; Baer, M.; Fletcher, J.G.; McCollough, C.H. 150-μm Spatial Resolution Using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography Technology: Technical Performance and First Patient Images. Investig. Radiol. 2018, 53, 655–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ferda, J.; Vendiš, T.; Flohr, T.; Schmidt, B.; Henning, A.; Ulzheimer, S.; Pecen, L.; Ferdová, E.; Baxa, J.; Mírka, H. Computed tomography with a full FOV photon-counting detector in a clinical setting, the first experience. Eur. J. Radiol. 2021, 137, 109614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rajendran, K.; Petersilka, M.; Henning, A.; Shanblatt, E.R.; Schmidt, B.; Flohr, T.G.; Ferrero, A.; Baffour, F.; Diehn, F.E.; Yu, L.; et al. First Clinical Photon-counting Detector CT System: Technical Evaluation. Radiology 2022, 303, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Rajiah, P.; Parakh, A.; Kay, F.; Baruah, D.; Kambadakone, A.R.; Leng, S. Update on Multienergy CT: Physics, Principles, and Applications. Radiographics 2020, 40, 1284–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cammin, J.; Xu, J.; Barber, W.C.; Iwanczyk, J.S.; Hartsough, N.E.; Taguchi, K. A cascaded model of spectral distortions due to spectral response effects and pulse pile-up effects in a photon-counting x-ray detector for CT. Med. Phys. 2014, 41, 041905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ren, L.; Zheng, B.; Liu, H. Tutorial on X-ray photon counting detector characterization. J. Xray Sci. Technol. 2018, 26, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Taguchi, K.; Frey, E.C.; Wang, X.; Iwanczyk, J.S.; Barber, W.C. An analytical model of the effects of pulse pile-up on the energy spectrum recorded by energy resolved photon counting x-ray detectors. Med. Phys. 2010, 37, 3957–3969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, A.S.; Pelc, N.J. Spectral Photon Counting CT: Imaging Algorithms and Performance Assessment. IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci. 2021, 5, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Flohr, T.; Schmidt, B. Technical Basics and Clinical Benefits of Photon-Counting CT. Investig. Radiol. 2023, 58, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Amukotuwa, S.A.; Bammer, R.; Jackson, D.M.; Sutherland, T. Iodinated contrast media shortage: Insights and guidance from two major public hospitals. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2022, 66, 946–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Chicoskie, C.; Tello, R. Gadolinium-enhanced MDCT angiography of the abdomen: Feasibility and limitations. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005, 184, 1821–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Moghiseh, M.; Lowe, C.; Lewis, J.G.; Kumar, D.; Butler, A.; Anderson, N.; Raja, A. Spectral Photon-Counting Molecular Imaging for Quantification of Monoclonal Antibody-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles Targeted to Lymphoma and Breast Cancer: An In Vitro Study. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2018, 2018, 2136840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Fu, J.J.; Guo, J.J.; Qin, A.P.; Yu, X.Y.; Zhang, Q.; Lei, X.P.; Huang, Y.G.; Chen, M.Y.; Li, J.X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Bismuth chelate as a contrast agent for X-ray computed tomography. J. Nanobiotechnology 2020, 18, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Knuuti, J.; Wijns, W.; Saraste, A.; Capodanno, D.; Barbato, E.; Funck-Brentano, C.; Prescott, E.; Storey, R.F.; Deaton, C.; Cuisset, T. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 407–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zhang, S.; Levin, D.C.; Halpern, E.J.; Fischman, D.; Savage, M.; Walinsky, P. Accuracy of MDCT in assessing the degree of stenosis caused by calcified coronary artery plaques. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008, 191, 1676–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Koons, E.; VanMeter, P.; Rajendran, K.; Yu, L.; McCollough, C.; Leng, S. Improved quantification of coronary artery luminal stenosis in the presence of heavy calcifications using photon-counting detector CT. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2022, 12031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Si-Mohamed, S.A.; Boccalini, S.; Lacombe, H.; Diaw, A.; Varasteh, M.; Rodesch, P.-A.; Dessouky, R.; Villien, M.; Tatard-Leitman, V.; Bochaton, T.; et al. Douek. Coronary CT Angiography with Photon-counting CT: First-In-Human Results. Radiology 2022, 303, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Li, Z.; Leng, S.; Halaweish, A.F.; Yu, Z.; Yu, L.; Ritman, E.L.; McCollough, C.H. Overcoming calcium blooming and improving the quantification accuracy of percent area luminal stenosis by material decomposition of multi-energy computed tomography datasets. J Med Imaging 2020, 7, 053501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Maintz, D.; Seifarth, H.; Raupach, R.; Flohr, T.; Rink, M.; Sommer, T.; Ozgün, M.; Heindel, W.; Fischbach, R. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: In vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur. Radiol. 2006, 16, 818–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mannil, M.; Hickethier, T.; von Spiczak, J.; Baer, M.; Henning, A.; Hertel, M.; Schmidt, B.; Flohr, T.; Maintz, D.; Alkadhi, H. Photon-Counting CT: High-Resolution Imaging of Coronary Stents. Investig. Radiol. 2018, 53, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Symons, R.; De Bruecker, Y.; Roosen, J.; Van Camp, L.; Cork, T.E.; Kappler, S.; Ulzheimer, S.; Sandfort, V.; Bluemke, D.A.; Pourmorteza, A. Quarter-millimeter spectral coronary stent imaging with photon-counting CT: Initial experience. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2018, 12, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Petritsch, B.; Petri, N.; Weng, A.M.; Petersilka, M.; Allmendinger, T.; Bley, T.A.; Gassenmaier, T. Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Coronary Stent Imaging: In Vitro Evaluation of 28 Coronary Stents. Investig. Radiol. 2021, 56, 653–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Rajagopal, J.R.; Farhadi, F.; Richards, T.; Nikpanah, M.; Sahbaee, P.; Shanbhag, S.M.; Bandettini, W.P.; Saboury, B.; Malayeri, A.A.; Pritchard, W.F.; et al. Evaluation of Coronary Plaques and Stents with Conventional and Photon-counting CT: Benefits of High-Resolution Photon-counting CT. Radiol. Cardiothorac. Imaging 2021, 3, e210102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Decker, J.A.; O’Doherty, J.; Schoepf, U.J.; Todoran, T.M.; Aquino, G.J.; Brandt, V.; Baruah, D.; Fink, N.; Zsarnoczay, E.; Flohr, T.; et al. Stent imaging on a clinical dual-source photon-counting detector CT system-impact of luminal attenuation and sharp kernels on lumen visibility. Eur. Radiol. 2023, 33, 2469–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Koons, E.K.; Thorne, J.E.; Huber, N.R.; Chang, S.; Rajendran, K.; McCollough, C.H.; Leng, S. Quantifying lumen diameter in coronary artery stents with high-resolution photon counting detector CT and convolutional neural network denoising. Med. Phys. 2023, 50, 4173–4181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Feuerlein, S.; Roessl, E.; Proksa, R.; Martens, G.; Klass, O.; Jeltsch, M.; Rasche, V.; Brambs, H.J.; Hoffmann, M.H.; Schlomka, J.P. Multienergy photon-counting K-edge imaging: Potential for improved luminal depiction in vascular imaging. Radiology 2008, 249, 1010–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Boccalini, S.; Si-Mohamed, S.A.; Lacombe, H.; Diaw, A.; Varasteh, M.; Rodesch, P.A.; Villien, M.; Sigovan, M.; Dessouky, R.; Coulon, P.; et al. First In-Human Results of Computed Tomography Angiography for Coronary Stent Assessment with a Spectral Photon Counting Computed Tomography. Investig. Radiol. 2022, 57, 212–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Geering, L.; Sartoretti, T.; Mergen, V.; Cundari, G.; Rusek, S.; Civaia, F.; Rossi, P.; Wildberger, J.E.; Templin, C.; Manka, R.; et al. First in-vivo coronary stent imaging with clinical ultra high resolution photon-counting CT. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2023, 17, 233–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Bratke, G.; Hickethier, T.; Bar-Ness, D.; Bunck, A.C.; Maintz, D.; Pahn, G.; Coulon, P.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Douek, P.; Sigovan, M. Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Coronary Stent Imaging: Evaluation of the Potential Clinical Impact for the Delineation of In-Stent Restenosis. Investig. Radiol. 2020, 55, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lo-Kioeng-Shioe, M.S.; Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen, D.; van Domburg, R.T.; Hadamitzky, M.; Lima, J.A.C.; Hoeks, S.E.; Deckers, J.W. Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score in symptomatic individuals: A meta-analysis of 34, 000 subjects. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 299, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rijlaarsdam-Hermsen, D.; Lo-Kioeng-Shioe, M.S.; Kuijpers, D.; van Domburg, R.T.; Deckers, J.W.; van Dijkman, P.R.M. Prognostic value of the coronary artery calcium score in suspected coronary artery disease: A study of 644 symptomatic patients. Neth. Heart J. 2020, 28, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Agatston, A.S.; Janowitz, W.R.; Hildner, F.J.; Zusmer, N.R.; Viamonte, M.; Detrano, R., Jr. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1990, 15, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. McCollough, C.H.; Ulzheimer, S.; Halliburton, S.S.; Shanneik, K.; White, R.D.; Kalender, W.A. Coronary artery calcium: A multimanufacturer international standard for quantification at cardiac CT. Radiology 2007, 243, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. van der Werf, N.R.; Si-Mohamed, S.; Rodesch, P.A.; van Hamersvelt, R.W.; Greuter, M.J.W.; Boccalini, S.; Greffier, J.; Leiner, T.; Boussel, L.; Willemink, M.J.; et al. Coronary calcium scoring potential of large field-of-view spectral photon-counting CT: A phantom study. Eur. Radiol. 2022, 32, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chang, S.; Ren, L.; Tang, S.; Marsh, J.F., Jr.; Hsieh, S.; McCollough, C.H.; Leng, S. Technical note: Exploring the detectability of coronary calcification using ultra-high-resolution photon-counting-detector CT. Med. Phys. 2023, 50, 6836–6843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Eberhard, M.; Mergen, V.; Higashigaito, K.; Allmendinger, T.; Manka, R.; Flohr, T.; Schmidt, B.; Euler, A.; Alkadhi, H. Coronary Calcium Scoring with First Generation Dual-Source Photon-Counting CT-First Evidence from Phantom and In-Vivo Scans. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Skoog, S.; Henriksson, L.; Gustafsson, H.; Sandstedt, M.; Elvelind, S.; Persson, A. Comparison of the Agatston score acquired with photon-counting detector CT and energy-integrating detector CT: Ex vivo study of cadaveric hearts. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2022, 38, 1145–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Marsh, J.F., Jr.; VanMeter, P.D.; Rajendran, K.; Leng, S.; McCollough, C.H. Ex vivo coronary calcium volume quantification using a high-spatial-resolution clinical photon-counting-detector computed tomography. J. Med. Imaging 2023, 10, 043501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. van der Werf, N.R.; van Gent, M.; Booij, R.; Bos, D.; van der Lugt, A.; Budde, R.P.J.; Greuter, M.J.W.; van Straten, M. Dose Reduction in Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using Mono-Energetic Images from Reduced Tube Voltage Dual-Source Photon-Counting CT Data: A Dynamic Phantom Study. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. van der Werf, N.R.; Greuter, M.J.W.; Booij, R.; van der Lugt, A.; Budde, R.P.J.; van Straten, M. Coronary calcium scores on dual-source photon-counting computed tomography: An adapted Agatston methodology aimed at radiation dose reduction. Eur. Radiol. 2022, 32, 5201–5209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. van der Werf, N.R.; Rodesch, P.A.; Si-Mohamed, S.; van Hamersvelt, R.W.; Greuter, M.J.W.; Leiner, T.; Boussel, L.; Willemink, M.J.; Douek, P. Improved coronary calcium detection and quantification with low-dose full field-of-view photon-counting CT: A phantom study. Eur. Radiol. 2022, 32, 3447–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Symons, R.; Sandfort, V.; Mallek, M.; Ulzheimer, S.; Pourmorteza, A. Coronary artery calcium scoring with photon-counting CT: First in vivo human experience. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 35, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Emrich, T.; Aquino, G.; Schoepf, U.J.; Braun, F.M.; Risch, F.; Bette, S.J.; Woznicki, P.; Decker, J.A.; O’Doherty, J.; Brandt, V.; et al. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Based Calcium Scoring: In Vitro and In Vivo Validation of a Novel Virtual Non-iodine Reconstruction Algorithm on a Clinical, First-Generation Dual-Source Photon Counting-Detector System. Investig. Radiol. 2022, 57, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Fink, N.; Zsarnoczay, E.; Schoepf, U.J.; O’Doherty, J.; Halfmann, M.C.; Allmendinger, T.; Hagenauer, J.; Griffith, J.P., 3rd; Vecsey-Nagy, M.; Pinos, D.; et al. Impact of Cardiac Motion on coronary artery calcium scoring using a virtual non-iodine algorithm on photon-counting detector CT: A dynamic phantom study. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2023, 39, 2083–2092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Mauriello, A.; Servadei, F.; Zoccai, G.B.; Giacobbi, E.; Anemona, L.; Bonanno, E.; Casella, S. Coronary calcification identifies the vulnerable patient rather than the vulnerable Plaque. Atherosclerosis 2013, 229, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Virmani, R.; Burke, A.P.; Farb, A.; Kolodgie, F.D. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47, C13–C18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Koenig, W.; Khuseyinova, N. Biomarkers of Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability and Rupture. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Virmani, R.; Kolodgie, F.D.; Burke, A.P.; Farb, A.; Schwartz, S.M. Lessons from sudden coronary death: A comprehensive morphological classification scheme for atherosclerotic lesions. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2000, 20, 1262–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Falk, E. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006, 47, C7–C12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Cau, R.; Faa, G.; Nardi, V.; Balestrieri, A.; Puig, J.; Suri, J.S.; SanFilippo, R.; Saba, L. Long-COVID diagnosis: From diagnostic to advanced AI-driven models. Eur. J. Radiol. 2022, 148, 110164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Bittner, D.O.; Mayrhofer, T.; Budoff, M.; Szilveszter, B.; Foldyna, B.; Hallett, T.R.; Ivanov, A.; Janjua, S.; Meyersohn, N.M.; Staziaki, P.V.; et al. Prognostic Value of Coronary CTA in Stable Chest Pain: CAD-RADS, CAC, and Cardiovascular Events in PROMISE. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2020, 13, 1534–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Obaid, D.R.; Calvert, P.A.; Gopalan, D.; Parker, R.A.; Hoole, S.P.; West, N.E.J.; Goddard, M.; Rudd, J.H.F.; Bennett, M.R. Atherosclerotic Plaque Composition and Classification Identified by Coronary Computed Tomography. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2013, 6, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Salem, A.M.; Davis, J.; Gopalan, D.; Rudd, J.H.F.; Clarke, S.C.; Schofield, P.M.; Bennett, M.R.; Brown, A.J.; Obaid, D.R. Characteristics of conventional high-risk coronary plaques and a novel CT defined thin-cap fibroatheroma in patients undergoing CCTA with stable chest pain. Clin. Imaging 2023, 101, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Cademartiri, F.; Balestrieri, A.; Cau, R.; Punzo, B.; Cavaliere, C.; Maffei, E.; Saba, L. Insight from imaging on plaque vulnerability: Similarities and differences between coronary and carotid arteries-implications for systemic therapies. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2020, 10, 1150–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Rotzinger, D.C.; Racine, D.; Becce, F.; Lahoud, E.; Erhard, K.; Si-Mohamed, S.A.; Greffier, J.; Viry, A.; Boussel, L.; Meuli, R.A.; et al. Performance of Spectral Photon-Counting Coronary CT Angiography and Comparison with Energy-Integrating-Detector CT: Objective Assessment with Model Observer. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Boussel, L.; Coulon, P.; Thran, A.; Roessl, E.; Martens, G.; Sigovan, M.; Douek, P. Photon counting spectral CT component analysis of coronary artery atherosclerotic plaque samples. Br. J. Radiol. 2014, 87, 20130798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Mergen, V.; Eberhard, M.; Manka, R.; Euler, A.; Alkadhi, H. First in-human quantitative plaque characterization with ultra-high resolution coronary photon-counting CT angiography. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 981012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Vattay, B.; Szilveszter, B.; Boussoussou, M.; Vecsey-Nagy, M.; Lin, A.; Konkoly, G.; Kubovje, A.; Schwarz, F.; Merkely, B.; Maurovich-Horvat, P.; et al. Impact of virtual monoenergetic levels on coronary plaque volume components using photon-counting computed tomography. Eur. Radiol. 2023, 33, 8528–8539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Koonce, J.D.; Vliegenthart, R.; Schoepf, U.J.; Schmidt, B.; Wahlquist, A.E.; Nietert, P.J.; Bastarrika, G.; Flohr, T.G.; Meinel, F.G. Accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for the measurement of iodine concentration using cardiac CT protocols: Validation in a phantom model. Eur. Radiol. 2014, 24, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Ruzsics, B.; Schwarz, F.; Schoepf, U.J.; Lee, Y.S.; Bastarrika, G.; Chiaramida, S.A.; Costello, P.; Zwerner, P.L. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am. J. Cardiol. 2009, 104, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wang, R.; Yu, W.; Wang, Y.; He, Y.; Yang, L.; Bi, T.; Jiao, J.; Wang, Q.; Chi, L.; Yu, Y.; et al. Incremental value of dual-energy CT to coronary CT angiography for the detection of significant coronary stenosis: Comparison with quantitative coronary angiography and single photon emission computed tomography. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2011, 27, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Ko, S.M.; Choi, J.W.; Song, M.G.; Shin, J.K.; Chee, H.K.; Chung, H.W.; Kim, D.H. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur. Radiol. 2011, 21, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Sun, K.; Han, R.; Zhao, R.; Bai, S.; Wang, J.; Hu, J.; Lu, B. Evaluation of dual energy computed tomography iodine mapping within the myocardial blood pool for detection of acute myocardial infarction: Correlation with histopathological findings in a porcine model. Br. J. Radiol. 2018, 91, 20170569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Polacin, M.; Templin, C.; Manka, R.; Alkadhi, H. Photon-counting computed tomography for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J.-Case Rep. 2022, 6, ytac028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Brooks, A.; Schinde, V.; Bateman, A.C.; Gallagher, P.J. Interstitial fibrosis in the dilated non-ischaemic myocardium. Heart 2003, 89, 1255–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Yamada, A.; Kitagawa, K.; Nakamura, S.; Takafuji, M.; Goto, Y.; Okamoto, R.; Dohi, K.; Sakuma, H. Quantification of extracellular volume fraction by cardiac computed tomography for non-invasive assessment of myocardial fibrosis in hemodialysis patients. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Scully, P.R.; Bastarrika, G.; Moon, J.C.; Treibel, T.A. Myocardial Extracellular Volume Quantification by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2018, 20, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Abadia, A.F.; van Assen, M.; Martin, S.S.; Vingiani, V.; Griffith, L.P.; Giovagnoli, D.A.; Bauer, M.J.; Schoepf, U.J. Myocardial extracellular volume fraction to differentiate healthy from cardiomyopathic myocardium using dual-source dual-energy CT. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2020, 14, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Kim, N.Y.; Im, D.J.; Youn, J.C.; Hong, Y.J.; Choi, B.W.; Kang, S.M.; Lee, H.J. Synthetic Extracellular Volume Fraction Derived Using Virtual Unenhanced Attenuation of Blood on Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Dual-Energy CT in Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2022, 218, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Dubourg, B.; Dacher, J.N.; Durand, E.; Caudron, J.; Bauer, F.; Bubenheim, M.; Eltchaninoff, H.; Serfaty, J.M. Single-source dual energy CT to assess myocardial extracellular volume fraction in aortic stenosis before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Diagn. Interv. Imaging 2021, 102, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Bandula, S.; White, S.K.; Flett, A.S.; Lawrence, D.; Pugliese, F.; Ashworth, M.T.; Punwani, S.; Taylor, S.A.; Moon, J.C. Measurement of myocardial extracellular volume fraction by using equilibrium contrast-enhanced CT: Validation against histologic findings. Radiology 2013, 269, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Treibel, T.A.; Bandula, S.; Fontana, M.; White, S.K.; Gilbertson, J.A.; Herrey, A.S.; Gillmore, J.D.; Punwani, S.; Hawkins, P.N.; Taylor, S.A.; et al. Extracellular volume quantification by dynamic equilibrium cardiac computed tomography in cardiac amyloidosis. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2015, 9, 585–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Oda, S.; Emoto, T.; Nakaura, T.; Kidoh, M.; Utsunomiya, D.; Funama, Y.; Nagayama, Y.; Takashio, S.; Ueda, M.; Yamashita, T.; et al. Myocardial Late Iodine Enhancement and Extracellular Volume Quantification with Dual-Layer Spectral Detector Dual-Energy Cardiac CT. Radiol. Cardiothorac. Imaging 2019, 1, e180003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Emoto, T.; Oda, S.; Kidoh, M.; Nakaura, T.; Nagayama, Y.; Sakabe, D.; Kakei, K.; Goto, M.; Funama, Y.; Hatemura, M.; et al. Myocardial Extracellular Volume Quantification Using Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Comparison of the Dual-energy Iodine Method and the Standard Subtraction Method. Acad. Radiol. 2021, 28, e119–e126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Nacif, M.S.; Kawel, N.; Lee, J.J.; Chen, X.; Yao, J.; Zavodni, A.; Sibley, C.T.; Lima, J.A.; Liu, S.; Bluemke, D.A. Interstitial myocardial fibrosis assessed as extracellular volume fraction with low-radiation-dose cardiac CT. Radiology 2012, 264, 876–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Wang, R.; Liu, X.; Schoepf, U.J.; van Assen, M.; Alimohamed, I.; Griffith, L.P.; Luo, T.; Sun, Z.; Fan, Z.; Xu, L. Extracellular volume quantitation using dual-energy CT in patients with heart failure: Comparison with 3T cardiac MR. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018, 268, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Mergen, V.; Sartoretti, T.; Klotz, E.; Schmidt, B.; Jungblut, L.; Higashigaito, K.; Manka, R.; Euler, A.; Kasel, M.; Eberhard, M.; et al. Extracellular Volume Quantification with Cardiac Late Enhancement Scanning Using Dual-Source Photon-Counting Detector CT. Investig. Radiol. 2022, 57, 406–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Suzuki, M.; Toba, T.; Izawa, Y.; Fujita, H.; Miwa, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Toh, H.; Kawamori, H.; Otake, H.; Tanaka, H.; et al. Prognostic Impact of Myocardial Extracellular Volume Fraction Assessment Using Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Patients Treated with Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021, 10, e020655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Aquino, G.J.; O’Doherty, J.; Schoepf, U.J.; Ellison, B.; Byrne, J.; Fink, N.; Zsarnoczay, E.; Wolf, E.V.; Allmendinger, T.; Schmidt, B.; et al. Myocardial Characterization with Extracellular Volume Mapping with a First-Generation Photon-counting Detector CT with MRI Reference. Radiology 2023, 307, e222030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Ohta, Y.; Kitao, S.; Yunaga, H.; Fujii, S.; Mukai, N.; Yamamoto, K.; Ogawa, T. Myocardial Delayed Enhancement CT for the Evaluation of Heart Failure: Comparison to MRI. Radiology 2018, 288, 682–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Bauer, R.W.; Kerl, J.M.; Fischer, N.; Burkhard, T.; Larson, M.C.; Ackermann, H.; Vogl, T.J. Dual-energy CT for the assessment of chronic myocardial infarction in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: Comparison with 3-T MRI. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2010, 195, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Nerlekar, N.; Brown, A.J.; Muthalaly, R.G.; Talman, A.; Hettige, T.; Cameron, J.D.; Wong, D.T.L. Association of Epicardial Adipose Tissue and High-Risk Plaque Characteristics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e006379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Goeller, M.; Tamarappoo, B.K.; Kwan, A.C.; Cadet, S.; Commandeur, F.; Razipour, A.; Slomka, P.J.; Gransar, H.; Chen, X.; Otaki, Y.; et al. Relationship between changes in pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation and coronary plaque burden quantified from coronary computed tomography angiography. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 20, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hoshino, M.; Yang, S.; Sugiyama, T.; Zhang, J.; Kanaji, Y.; Yamaguchi, M.; Hada, M.; Sumino, Y.; Horie, T.; Nogami, K.; et al. Peri-coronary inflammation is associated with findings on coronary computed tomography angiography and fractional flow reserve. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr. 2020, 14, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Yuvaraj, J.; Lin, A.; Nerlekar, N.; Munnur, R.K.; Cameron, J.D.; Dey, D.; Nicholls, S.J.; Wong, D.T.L. Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Attenuation Is Associated with High-Risk Plaque and Subsequent Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease. Cells 2021, 10, 1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Chen, X.; Dang, Y.; Hu, H.; Ma, S.; Ma, Y.; Wang, K.; Liu, T.; Lu, X.; Hou, Y. Pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation assessed by dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography is a sensitive imaging marker of high-risk plaques. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2021, 11, 2093–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Antonopoulos, A.S.; Sanna, F.; Sabharwal, N.; Thomas, S.; Oikonomou, E.K.; Herdman, L.; Margaritis, M.; Shirodaria, C.; Kampoli, A.M.; Akoumianakis, I.; et al. Detecting human coronary inflammation by imaging perivascular fat. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaal2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Ma, R.; Fari, R.; van der Harst, P.; De Cecco, C.N.; Stillman, A.E.; Vliegenthart, R.; van Assen, M. Evaluation of pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation on CT. Br. J. Radiol. 2023, 96, 20220885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Risch, F.; Schwarz, F.; Braun, F.; Bette, S.; Becker, J.; Scheurig-Muenkler, C.; Kroencke, T.J.; Decker, J.A. Assessment of epicardial adipose tissue on virtual non-contrast images derived from photon-counting detector coronary CTA datasets. Eur. Radiol. 2023, 33, 2450–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Mergen, V.; Ried, E.; Allmendinger, T.; Sartoretti, T.; Higashigaito, K.; Manka, R.; Euler, A.; Alkadhi, H.; Eberhard, M. Epicardial Adipose Tissue Attenuation and Fat Attenuation Index: Phantom Study and In Vivo Measurements with Photon-Counting Detector CT. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2022, 218, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Gillies, R.J.; Kinahan, P.E.; Hricak, H. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology 2016, 278, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Mayerhoefer, M.E.; Szomolanyi, P.; Jirak, D.; Materka, A.; Trattnig, S. Effects of MRI acquisition parameter variations and protocol heterogeneity on the results of texture analysis and pattern discrimination: An application-oriented study. Med. Phys. 2009, 36, 1236–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Ayx, I.; Tharmaseelan, H.; Hertel, A.; Nörenberg, D.; Overhoff, D.; Rotkopf, L.T.; Riffel, P.; Schoenberg, S.O.; Froelich, M.F. Comparison Study of Myocardial Radiomics Feature Properties on Energy-Integrating and Photon-Counting Detector CT. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Ayx, I.; Tharmaseelan, H.; Hertel, A.; Norenberg, D.; Overhoff, D.; Rotkopf, L.T.; Riffel, P.; Schoenberg, S.O.; Froelich, M.F. Myocardial Radiomics Texture Features Associated with Increased Coronary Calcium Score-First Results of a Photon-Counting CT. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Dunning, C.A.S.; Rajiah, P.S.; Hsieh, S.S.; Esquivel, A.; Yalon, M.; Weber, N.M.; Gong, H.; Fletcher, J.G.; McCollough, C.H.; Leng, S. Classification of high-risk coronary plaques using radiomic analysis of multi-energy photon-counting-detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) images. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2023, 12465, 654–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a photon-counting detector, which directly converts X-rays into an electrical signal (top) and a conventional energy-integrating detector (bottom).
Figure 1. Schematic representation of a photon-counting detector, which directly converts X-rays into an electrical signal (top) and a conventional energy-integrating detector (bottom).
Jcm 13 02359 g001
Figure 2. Spectral cardiac CT angiography of coronary arteries and left ventricle in a patient with previous PCI. The figure shows a spectral CT angiography in a patient with chronic pulmonary embolism displayed with 3D-cinematic rendering (A), a stretched MPR along the central lumen line of the intermediate branch (IM) with a proximal stent (arrowheads in (A)) (B), the first pass rest perfusion image (spectral monochromatic+ 40 KeV with color-coded perfusion overlay) (C), and) the overlay of 3D-volume rendering with the anatomy of the coronary arteries and color-coded perfusion map (D). The figure shows a significant in-stent restenosis (arrowhead in (B)) that causes segmental perfusion delay/defect in rest first-pass perfusion (arrowhead in (C)). The correspondence between the restenosis and the perfusion defect is displayed in (D) (arrowhead). The scan was performed on a commercial whole-body Dual Source Photon-Counting CT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), with 0.2/0.4 mm slice thickness, 0.1/0.2 mm reconstruction increment, FOV 140–160 mm, resolution matrix of 512 × 512/1024 × 1024 pixels on the source axial reconstructions with a kernel filtering of Bv48-60-72 (vascular kernel medium-sharp) and with maximum intensity of Quantum Iterative Reconstruction (QIR 4); the scan is performed with retrospective ECG gating with tube current modulation. The displayed spatial resolution is 0.10/0.20 mm. Abbreviations: PCCT = Photon-Counting CT; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; ECG = electrocardiographic.
Figure 2. Spectral cardiac CT angiography of coronary arteries and left ventricle in a patient with previous PCI. The figure shows a spectral CT angiography in a patient with chronic pulmonary embolism displayed with 3D-cinematic rendering (A), a stretched MPR along the central lumen line of the intermediate branch (IM) with a proximal stent (arrowheads in (A)) (B), the first pass rest perfusion image (spectral monochromatic+ 40 KeV with color-coded perfusion overlay) (C), and) the overlay of 3D-volume rendering with the anatomy of the coronary arteries and color-coded perfusion map (D). The figure shows a significant in-stent restenosis (arrowhead in (B)) that causes segmental perfusion delay/defect in rest first-pass perfusion (arrowhead in (C)). The correspondence between the restenosis and the perfusion defect is displayed in (D) (arrowhead). The scan was performed on a commercial whole-body Dual Source Photon-Counting CT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), with 0.2/0.4 mm slice thickness, 0.1/0.2 mm reconstruction increment, FOV 140–160 mm, resolution matrix of 512 × 512/1024 × 1024 pixels on the source axial reconstructions with a kernel filtering of Bv48-60-72 (vascular kernel medium-sharp) and with maximum intensity of Quantum Iterative Reconstruction (QIR 4); the scan is performed with retrospective ECG gating with tube current modulation. The displayed spatial resolution is 0.10/0.20 mm. Abbreviations: PCCT = Photon-Counting CT; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; ECG = electrocardiographic.
Jcm 13 02359 g002
Figure 3. Spectral cardiac/coronary PCCT example of sub-acute LV ischemia. The figure shows a patient with a recent acute myocardial infarction in the territory of the right coronary artery and of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Panels (A,B) show a short-axis view of the base of the left ventricle (LV) in arterial/angiographic phase (A) and delayed phase (B); panels (C,D) show the same information in the apical section of the LV. Arrowheads indicate the multiple LV segments with hypoperfusion (early and late). The delayed phase was performed with spectral acquisition and monochromatic+ 40 KeV reconstruction. The scan was performed on a commercial whole-body Dual Source Photon-Counting CT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers), with 0.2/0.4 mm slice thickness, 0.1/0.2 mm reconstruction increment, FOV 140–160 mm, resolution matrix of 512 × 512/1024 × 1024 pixels on the source axial reconstructions with a kernel filtering of Bv48-60 (vascular kernel medium-sharp) and with maximum intensity of Quantum Iterative Reconstruction (QIR 4); the scan is performed with retrospective ECG gating with tube current modulation. The displayed spatial resolution is 0.1/0.20 mm. Abbreviations: PCCT = Photon-Counting CT; LV = left ventricle; ECG = electrocardiographic.
Figure 3. Spectral cardiac/coronary PCCT example of sub-acute LV ischemia. The figure shows a patient with a recent acute myocardial infarction in the territory of the right coronary artery and of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Panels (A,B) show a short-axis view of the base of the left ventricle (LV) in arterial/angiographic phase (A) and delayed phase (B); panels (C,D) show the same information in the apical section of the LV. Arrowheads indicate the multiple LV segments with hypoperfusion (early and late). The delayed phase was performed with spectral acquisition and monochromatic+ 40 KeV reconstruction. The scan was performed on a commercial whole-body Dual Source Photon-Counting CT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers), with 0.2/0.4 mm slice thickness, 0.1/0.2 mm reconstruction increment, FOV 140–160 mm, resolution matrix of 512 × 512/1024 × 1024 pixels on the source axial reconstructions with a kernel filtering of Bv48-60 (vascular kernel medium-sharp) and with maximum intensity of Quantum Iterative Reconstruction (QIR 4); the scan is performed with retrospective ECG gating with tube current modulation. The displayed spatial resolution is 0.1/0.20 mm. Abbreviations: PCCT = Photon-Counting CT; LV = left ventricle; ECG = electrocardiographic.
Jcm 13 02359 g003
Figure 4. Spectral cardiac/coronary PCCT example of chronic LV ischemia. The figure shows a patient who underwent a cardiac CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease, displaying a delayed perfusion at rest in the territory of the circumflex coronary artery (lateral wall of the LV). Panel (A) shows a mid-basal short-axis view of the left ventricle (LV) in arterial/angiographic phase; panel (B) shows the same projection with iodine distribution; panel (C) shows the standard image with color-coded LV map; and panel (D) shows the same projection with mixed virtual non-contrast/iodine map overlay. Arrowheads indicate, in each figure, the sharp perfusion delay (early) in the lateral wall of the LV. The delayed phase was performed with acquisition and Spectral Monochromatic+ 40 KeV reconstruction. The scan was performed on a commercial whole-body Dual Source Photon-Counting CT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers), with 0.2/0.4 mm slice thickness, 0.1/0.2 mm reconstruction increment, FOV 140–160 mm, resolution matrix of 512 × 512/1024 × 1024 pixels on the source axial reconstructions with a kernel filtering of Bv48-60 (vascular kernel medium-sharp) and with maximum intensity of Quantum Iterative Reconstruction (QIR 4); the scan is performed with retrospective ECG gating with tube current modulation. The displayed spatial resolution is 0.1/0.20 mm. Abbreviations: PCCT = Photon-Counting CT; LV = left ventricle; ECG = electrocardiographic.
Figure 4. Spectral cardiac/coronary PCCT example of chronic LV ischemia. The figure shows a patient who underwent a cardiac CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease, displaying a delayed perfusion at rest in the territory of the circumflex coronary artery (lateral wall of the LV). Panel (A) shows a mid-basal short-axis view of the left ventricle (LV) in arterial/angiographic phase; panel (B) shows the same projection with iodine distribution; panel (C) shows the standard image with color-coded LV map; and panel (D) shows the same projection with mixed virtual non-contrast/iodine map overlay. Arrowheads indicate, in each figure, the sharp perfusion delay (early) in the lateral wall of the LV. The delayed phase was performed with acquisition and Spectral Monochromatic+ 40 KeV reconstruction. The scan was performed on a commercial whole-body Dual Source Photon-Counting CT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers), with 0.2/0.4 mm slice thickness, 0.1/0.2 mm reconstruction increment, FOV 140–160 mm, resolution matrix of 512 × 512/1024 × 1024 pixels on the source axial reconstructions with a kernel filtering of Bv48-60 (vascular kernel medium-sharp) and with maximum intensity of Quantum Iterative Reconstruction (QIR 4); the scan is performed with retrospective ECG gating with tube current modulation. The displayed spatial resolution is 0.1/0.20 mm. Abbreviations: PCCT = Photon-Counting CT; LV = left ventricle; ECG = electrocardiographic.
Jcm 13 02359 g004
Figure 5. Spectral cardiac/coronary PCCT example of chronic post-infarction cardiomyopathy of the LV. The figure shows a patient who underwent a cardiac CT to assess the status of coronary artery disease and the viability of the left ventricle (LV; A–D). Panel (A) shows a 2-chamber long-axis view of the left chambers of the heart with extensive near transmural ischemic delayed enhancement of the anterior wall of the LV in the delayed phase; panels (BD) show the short-axis view of the LV at the basal, mid, and apical sections of the LV. The delayed phase was performed with spectral acquisition and monochromatic+ 40 KeV reconstruction; in this case, the patient also has an intracardiac device; however, there are no issues in terms of safety or image quality. The scan was performed on a commercial whole-body Dual Source Photon-Counting CT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers), with 0.2/0.4 mm slice thickness, 0.1/0.2 mm reconstruction increment, FOV 140–160 mm, resolution matrix of 512 × 512/1024 × 1024 pixels on the source axial reconstructions with a kernel filtering of Bv48-60 (vascular kernel medium-sharp) and with maximum intensity of Quantum Iterative Reconstruction (QIR 4); the scan is performed with retrospective ECG gating with tube current modulation. The displayed spatial resolution is 0.1/0.20 mm. Abbreviations: PCCT = Photon-Counting CT; LV = left ventricle; ECG = electrocardiographic.
Figure 5. Spectral cardiac/coronary PCCT example of chronic post-infarction cardiomyopathy of the LV. The figure shows a patient who underwent a cardiac CT to assess the status of coronary artery disease and the viability of the left ventricle (LV; A–D). Panel (A) shows a 2-chamber long-axis view of the left chambers of the heart with extensive near transmural ischemic delayed enhancement of the anterior wall of the LV in the delayed phase; panels (BD) show the short-axis view of the LV at the basal, mid, and apical sections of the LV. The delayed phase was performed with spectral acquisition and monochromatic+ 40 KeV reconstruction; in this case, the patient also has an intracardiac device; however, there are no issues in terms of safety or image quality. The scan was performed on a commercial whole-body Dual Source Photon-Counting CT scanner (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens Healthineers), with 0.2/0.4 mm slice thickness, 0.1/0.2 mm reconstruction increment, FOV 140–160 mm, resolution matrix of 512 × 512/1024 × 1024 pixels on the source axial reconstructions with a kernel filtering of Bv48-60 (vascular kernel medium-sharp) and with maximum intensity of Quantum Iterative Reconstruction (QIR 4); the scan is performed with retrospective ECG gating with tube current modulation. The displayed spatial resolution is 0.1/0.20 mm. Abbreviations: PCCT = Photon-Counting CT; LV = left ventricle; ECG = electrocardiographic.
Jcm 13 02359 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Meloni, A.; Maffei, E.; Clemente, A.; De Gori, C.; Occhipinti, M.; Positano, V.; Berti, S.; La Grutta, L.; Saba, L.; Cau, R.; et al. Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: Technical Principles and Applications in the Assessment of Cardiovascular Diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082359

AMA Style

Meloni A, Maffei E, Clemente A, De Gori C, Occhipinti M, Positano V, Berti S, La Grutta L, Saba L, Cau R, et al. Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: Technical Principles and Applications in the Assessment of Cardiovascular Diseases. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(8):2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082359

Chicago/Turabian Style

Meloni, Antonella, Erica Maffei, Alberto Clemente, Carmelo De Gori, Mariaelena Occhipinti, Vicenzo Positano, Sergio Berti, Ludovico La Grutta, Luca Saba, Riccardo Cau, and et al. 2024. "Spectral Photon-Counting Computed Tomography: Technical Principles and Applications in the Assessment of Cardiovascular Diseases" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 8: 2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082359

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop