Laparoscopic Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Trend for Addressing Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Literature Search and Study Selection Process
2.2. Data Extraction
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Surgical Technique and 30-Day Outcomes
3.2. Follow-Up Outcomes
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Paravastu, S.C.; Jayarajasingam, R.; Cottam, R.; Palfreyman, S.J.; Michaels, J.A.; Thomas, S.M. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014, 1, CD004178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stather, P.W.; Sidloff, D.; Dattani, N.; Choke, E.; Bown, M.J.; Sayers, R.D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br. J. Surg. 2013, 100, 863–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Powell, J.T.; Sweeting, M.J.; Ulug, P.; Blankensteijn, J.D.; Lederle, F.A.; Becquemin, J.P.; Greenhalgh, R.M.; EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE Trialists. Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. Br. J. Surg. 2017, 104, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moll, F.L.; Powell, J.T.; Fraedrich, G.; Verzini, F.; Haulon, S.; Waltham, M.; van Herwaarden, J.A.; Holt, P.J.E.; van Keulen, J.W.; Rantner, B.; et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2011, 41 (Suppl. S1), S1–S58. [Google Scholar]
- Dingemans, S.A.; Jonker, F.H.; Moll, F.L.; van Herwaarden, J.A. Aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2016, 31, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lo, R.C.; Buck, D.B.; Herrmann, J.; Hamdan, A.D.; Wyers, M.; Patel, V.I.; Fillinger, M.; Schermerhorn, M.L. Vascular Study Group of New England. Risk factors and consequences of persistent type II endoleaks. J. Vasc. Surg. 2016, 63, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Veith, F.J.; Baum, R.A.; Ohki, T.; Amor, M.; Adiseshiah, M.; Blankensteijn, J.D.; Buth, J.; Chuter, T.A.; Fairman, R.M.; Gilling-Smith, G.; et al. Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: Summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J. Vasc. Surg. 2002, 35, 1029–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Velazquez, O.C.; Baum, R.A.; Carpenter, J.P.; Golden, M.A.; Cohn, M.; Pyeron, A.; Barker, C.F.; Criado, F.J.; Fairman, R.M. Relationship between preoperative patency of the inferior mesenteric artery and subsequent occurrence of type II endoleak in patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 2000, 32, 777–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Güntner, O.; Zeman, F.; Wohlgemuth, W.A.; Heiss, P.; Jung, E.M.; Wiggermann, P.; Pfister, K.; Stroszczynski, C.; Müller-Wille, R. Inferior mesenteric arterial type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: Are they predictable? Radiology 2014, 270, 910–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manunga, J.M.; Cragg, A.; Garberich, R.; Urbach, J.A.; Skeik, N.; Alexander, J.; Titus, J.; Stephenson, E.; Alden, P.; Sullivan, T.M. Preoperative inferior mesenteric artery embolization: A valid method to reduce the rate of type II endoleak after EVAR? Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2017, 39, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silverberg, D.; Baril, D.T.; Ellozy, S.H.; Carroccio, A.; Greyrose, S.E.; Lookstein, R.A.; Marin, M.L. An 8-year experience with type II endoleaks: Natural history suggests selective intervention is a safe approach. J. Vasc. Surg. 2006, 44, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sarac, T.P.; Gibbons, C.; Vargas, L.; Liu, J.; Srivastava, S.; Bena, J.; Mastracci, T.; Kashyap, V.S.; Clair, D. Long-term follow-up of type II endoleak embolization reveals the need for close surveillance. J. Vasc. Surg. 2012, 55, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wanhainen, A.; Van Herzeele, I.; Bastos Goncalves, F.; Bellmunt Montoya, S.; Berard, X.; Boyle, J.R.; D’Oria, M.; Prendes, C.F.; Karkos, C.D.; Kazimierczak, A.; et al. Editor’s Choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2024, 67, 192–331. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Charisis, N.; Bouris, V.; Rakic, A.; Landau, D.; Labropoulos, N. A systematic review on endovascular repair of isolated common iliac artery aneurysms and suggestions regarding diameter thresholds for intervention. J. Vasc. Surg. 2021, 74, 1752–1762.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bryce, Y.; Lam, C.K.; Ganguli, S.; Schiro, B.J.; Cooper, K.; Cline, M.; Oklu, R.; Vatakencherry, G.; Peña, C.S.; Gandhi, R.T. Step-by-Step Approach to Management of Type II Endoleaks. Tech. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2018, 21, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Touma, J.; Coscas, R.; Javerliat, I.; Colacchio, G.; Goëau-Brissonnière, O.; Coggia, M. A technical tip for total laparoscopic type II endoleak repair. J. Vasc. Surg. 2015, 61, 817–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stavropoulos, S.W.; Park, J.; Fairman, R.; Carpenter, J. Type 2 endoleak embolization comparison: Translumbar embolization versus modified transarterial embolization. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2009, 20, 1299–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, A.; Saggu, G.K.; Bown, M.J.; Sayers, R.D.; Sidloff, D.A. Type II endoleaks: Challenges and solutions. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2016, 12, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cieri, E.; De Rango, P.; Isernia, G.; Simonte, G.; Ciucci, A.; Parlani, G.; Verzini, F.; Cao, P. Type II endoleak is an enigmatic and unpredictable marker of worse outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair. J. Vasc. Surg. 2014, 59, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Batti, S.; Cochennec, F.; Roudot-Thoraval, F.; Becquemin, J.P. Type II endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm are not always a benign condition. J. Vasc. Surg. 2013, 57, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gandini, R.; Chiocchi, M.; Loreni, G.; Del Giudice, C.; Morosetti, D.; Chiaravalloti, A.; Simonetti, G. Treatment of type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: The role of selective vs. nonselective transcaval embolization. J. Endovasc. Ther. 2014, 21, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spanos, K.; Tsilimparis, N.; Larena-Avellaneda, A.; Giannoukas, A.D.; Debus, S.E.; Kölbel, T. Systematic review of laparoscopic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for the treatment of type II endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J. Vasc. Surg. 2017, 66, 1878–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirignano, P.; Mangialardi, N.; Nespola, M.; Aloisi, F.; Orrico, M.; Ronchey, S.; Del Porto, F.; Taurino, M. Incidence and Fate of Refractory Type II Endoleak after EVAR: A Retrospective Experience of Two High-Volume Italian Centers. J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- San Norberto, E.M.; Fidalgo-Domingos, L.A.; Romero, A.; Vaquero, C. Total Laparoscopic Inferior Mesenteric Artery Ligation and Direct Sac Puncture Embolization Technique for Treatment of Type II Endoleak. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2020, 54, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Morelli, L.; Guadagni, S.; Di Franco, G.; Palmeri, M.; Furbetta, N.; Gianardi, D.; Bianchini, M.; Moglia, A.; Di Candio, G.; Ferrari, M.; et al. Technical details and preliminary results of a full robotic type II endoleak treatment with the da Vinci Xi. J. Robot. Surg. 2019, 13, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Piffaretti, G.; Franchin, M.; Botteri, E.; Boni, L.; Carrafiello, G.; Battaglia, G.; Bonardelli, S.; Castelli, P. Operative treatment of type 2 endoleaks involving the inferior mesenteric artery. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2017, 39, 48–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, J.; Sun, Y.; Yang, H.; Ma, H.; Jiang, J.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, X. Laparoscopic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery and internal iliac artery for the treatment of symptomatic type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Int. Surg. 2014, 99, 681–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.C.; Eun, D.; Shrivastava, A.; Shepard, A.D.; Reddy, D.J. Total robotic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2009, 255, e19–e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feezor, R.J.; Nelson, P.R.; Lee, W.A.; Zingarelli, W.; Cendan, J.C. Laparoscopic repair of a type II endoleak. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 2006, 16, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.; Lumsden, A.B.; Li, J. IMA clipping for a type II endoleak: Combined laparoscopic and endovascular approach. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutaneous Tech. 2006, 16, 272–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karkos, C.D.; Hayes, P.D.; Lloyd, D.M.; Fishwick, G.; White, S.A.; Quadar, S.; Sayers, R.D. Combined laparoscopic and percutaneous treatment of a type II endoleak following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Cardiovasc. Interv. Radiol. 2005, 28, 656–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ho, P.; Law, W.L.; Tung, P.H.; Poon, J.T.; Ting, A.C.; Cheng, S.W. Laparoscopic transperitoneal clipping of the inferior mesenteric artery for the management of type II endoleak after endovascular repair of an aneurysm. Surg. Endosc. 2004, 18, 870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Richardson, W.S.; Sternbergh, W.C., 3rd; Money, S.R. Laparoscopic inferior mesenteric artery ligation: An alternative for the treatment of type II endoleaks. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 2003, 13, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wisselink, W.; Cuesta, M.A.; Berends, F.J.; van den Berg, F.G.; Rauwerda, J.A. Retroperitoneal endoscopic ligation of lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries as a treatment of persistent endoleak after endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair. J. Vasc. Surg. 2000, 31, 1240–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, J.E.; Atkins, M.D.; Brewster, D.C.; Chung, T.K.; Kwolek, C.J.; LaMuraglia, G.M.; Hodgman, T.M.; Cambria, R.P. Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. J. Vasc. Surg. 2007, 46, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wyss, T.R.; Brown, L.C.; Powell, J.T.; Greenhalgh, R.M. Rate and predictability of graft rupture after endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Data from the EVAR trials. Ann. Surg. 2010, 252, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sidloff, D.A.; Stather, P.W.; Choke, E.; Bown, M.J.; Sayers, R.D. Type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Br. J. Surg. 2013, 100, 1262–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moulakakis, K.G.; Klonaris, C.; Kakisis, J.; Antonopoulos, C.N.; Lazaris, A.; Sfyroeras, G.S.; Mantas, G.; Vasdekis, S.N.; Brountzos, E.N.; Geroulakos, G. Treatment of Type II Endoleak and Aneurysm Expansion after EVAR. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2017, 39, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akmal, M.M.; Pabittei, D.R.; Prapassaro, T.; Suhartono, R.; Moll, F.L.; van Herwaarden, J.A. A systematic review of the current status of interventions for type II endoleak after EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Int. J. Surg. 2021, 95, 106138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rouhani, M.J.; Thapar, A.; Maruthappu, M.; Munster, A.B.; Davies, A.H.; Shalhoub, J. Systematic review of perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vascular 2015, 23, 525–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voûte, M.T.; Bastos Gonçalves, F.M.; Hendriks, J.M.; Metz, R.; van Sambeek, M.R.; Muhs, B.E.; Verhagen, H. Treatment of post-implantation aneurysm growth by laparoscopic sac fenestration: Long-term results. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2012, 44, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karthikesalingam, A.; Thrumurthy, S.G.; Jackson, D.; Choke, E.; Sayers, R.D.; Loftus, I.M.; Thompson, M.M.; Holt, P.J. Current evidence is insufficient to define an optional threshold for intervention in isolated type II endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. J. Endovasc. Ther. 2012, 19, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bastos Gonçalves, F.; Baderkhan, H.; Verhagen, H.J.; Wanhainen, A.; Björck, M.; Stolker, R.; Hoeks, S.E.; Mani, K. Early sac shrinkage predicts a low risk of late complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Br. J. Surg. 2014, 101, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kray, J.; Kirk, S.; Franko, J.; Chew, D.K. Role of type II endoleak in sac regression after endovascular repair of infra-renal abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Vasc. Surg. 2015, 61, 869–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chew, D.K.; Dong, S.; Schroeder, A.C.; Hsu, H.W.; Franko, J. The role of the inferior mesenteric artery in predicting secondary intervention for type II endoleak following endovascular aneurysm repair. J. Vasc. Surg. 2019, 70, 1463–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Study (Year of Publication) | No. of Cases | Mean Age, Years * | AAA Diameter, mm | HT | HL | CAD | COPD | DM | CKD | Obesity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sirignano (2022) [24] | 3 | 77 ± 8 | 64.7 ± 14 | 2/3 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 1/3 | 0/3 | 0/3 | NA |
San Norberto et al. (2019) [25] | 1 | 72 | 62 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Morelli et al. (2019) [26] | 2 | 76 ± 5.7 | 72.5 ± 3.5 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | 1/2 | 0/2 | 0/2 | NA |
Piffaretti et al. (2017) [27] | 11 | 76 ± 10 | 60 | 9/11 | NA | 6/11 | 2/11 | 1/11 | 2/11 | 2/11 |
Zou et al. (2014) [28] | 1 | 55 | 70 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lin et al. (2009) [29] | 1 | 84 | 61 | 1/1 | NA | 0/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 1/1 |
Feezor et al. (2006) [30] | 1 | 72 | 67 | 0/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
Zhou et al. (2006) [31] | 1 | 61 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1/1 | NA |
Karkos et al. (2005) [32] | 1 | 76 | 129 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Ho et al. (2004) [33] | 1 | 74 | 60 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 | 0/1 |
Richardson et al. (2003) [34] | 2 | 70.2 | 55 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Wisselink et al. (2000) [35] | 1 | 74 | 65 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Total | 26 | 72.3 ± 7.6 | 69.7 ± 20.3 | 14/19 | 3/7 | 7/19 | 5/19 | 1/19 | 3/20 | 3/14 |
Study (Year of Publication) | Procedural duration, Min * | Red Blood Cell Units Transfused | Evaluation of Technical Success | Technical Success | Accompanying Procedures | Conversion to Open Surgery |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sirignano (2022) [24] | NA | NA | NA | 3/3 | 0 | 0 |
San Norberto et al. (2019) [25] | 132 | 0 | Postoperative CTA | 1/1 | Thrombin injected into aneurysmal sac | 0 |
Morelli et al. (2019) [26] | 182.5 ± 3.5 | 0 | Postoperative CEUS | 2/2 | Endoscopic clipping of a patent lumbar artery | 0 |
Piffaretti et al. (2017) [27] | 97 ± 46 | 0 | Postoperative duplex scan | 11/11 | 0 | 0 |
Zou et al. (2014) [28] | 50 | 0 | NA | 1/1 | Laparoscopic clipping of right IIA | 0 |
Lin et al. (2009) [29] | 249 | 0 | NA | 1/1 | 0 | 0 |
Feezor et al. (2006) [30] | NA | 0 | Immediate postoperative CTA | 1/1 | 0 | 0 |
Zhou et al. (2006) [31] | NA | 0 | Intraoperative DSA | 1/1 | 0 | 0 |
Karkos et al. (2005) [32] | 80 | 0 | Intraoperative DSA | 1/1 | 1000 units of thrombin injected in the aneurysmal sac | 0 |
Ho et al. (2004) [33] | 60 | 0 | Postoperative duplex scan | 1/1 | Previous failed coil embolization of IMA | 0 |
Richardson et al. (2003) [34] | 85 | 0 | 24 h postoperative CTA | 2/2 (1 reoperation in 24 h) | NA | 0 |
Wisselink et al. (2000) [35] | 130 | 0 | 24 h postoperative CTA | 1/1 (reoperation in 24 h) | Lumbar arteries clipping, and in reoperation, thrombin was injected in the aneurysmal sac | 0 |
118.4 ± 63.9 | 0/25 | 24/26 ** | 0/26 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Roditis, K.; Tsiantoula, P.; Giannakopoulos, N.-N.; Antoniou, A.; Papaioannou, V.; Tzamtzidou, S.; Manou, D.; Seretis, K.G.; Papas, T.T.; Bessias, N. Laparoscopic Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Trend for Addressing Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 2584. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092584
Roditis K, Tsiantoula P, Giannakopoulos N-N, Antoniou A, Papaioannou V, Tzamtzidou S, Manou D, Seretis KG, Papas TT, Bessias N. Laparoscopic Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Trend for Addressing Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(9):2584. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092584
Chicago/Turabian StyleRoditis, Konstantinos, Paraskevi Tsiantoula, Nikolaos-Nektarios Giannakopoulos, Afroditi Antoniou, Vasileios Papaioannou, Sofia Tzamtzidou, Dimitra Manou, Konstantinos G. Seretis, Theofanis T. Papas, and Nikolaos Bessias. 2024. "Laparoscopic Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery: A Systematic Review of an Emerging Trend for Addressing Type II Endoleak Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 9: 2584. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13092584