Next Article in Journal
Epidemiological Changes in Pediatric RSV Infections in Poland (2016–2024): Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Association Between Body Mass Index and Uterotonic Use in Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
More than a Diagnosis: How Prenatal Identification of Cantú Syndrome Transformed a Family’s Medical Narrative
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 14
Issue 17
10.3390/jcm14176281
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Impact of Gynecological Pathologies on Patients’ Quality of Life from Menarche to Menopause—Literature Review

by
Mihaela Amza
1,2,3,
Bashar Haj Hamoud
4,
Romina-Marina Sima
2,3,*,
Gabriel-Petre Gorecki
5,
Mircea-Octavian Poenaru
2,3,
Andrei-Sebastian Diaconescu
6,7,
Nicolae Gică
2,8,
Ancuta-Alina Constantin
9,10,
Mihai Popescu
11,12 and
Liana Pleș
2,3
1
Department Ph.D., IOSUD, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
3
“Bucur” Maternity, Saint John Hospital, 012361 Bucharest, Romania
4
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, 66424 Homburg, Germany
5
Faculty of Medicine, Titu Maiorescu University, 040441 Bucharest, Romania
6
Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
7
General Surgery Department, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
8
Filantropia Clinical Hospital Bucharest, 011132 Bucharest, Romania
9
Department of Cardio-Thoracic Pathology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
10
“Marius Nasta” National Institute of Pneumology, 050159 Bucharest, Romania
11
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
12
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bucharest University Emergency Hospital, 050098 Bucharest, Romania
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(17), 6281; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176281
Submission received: 10 August 2025 / Revised: 3 September 2025 / Accepted: 4 September 2025 / Published: 5 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Challenges in Obstetrics and Gynecology: Interactions Between Gynecological and Obstetric Disorders, Quality of Life, and Mental Health in Women)
Versions Notes

Abstract

Quality of life represents a key area of concern in every stage of life. It is necessary to pay more attention to the factors or conditions that can negatively affect quality of life. From adolescence until postmenopause, women face a series of gynecological conditions that can significantly reduce their quality of life and which also represent economic problems. We conducted a literature review to present the impact of gynecological pathologies on patients’ quality of life and the tools used to assess these effects. The goals were to increase the attention given to this topic and to encourage health care providers to prioritize patients’ quality of life in the management of gynecological pathologies. Most of the time, gynecological pathologies reduce self-esteem, cause fear, anxiety, and depression, and the feeling of a lack of control may appear. Social life, professional and university activities, relationships, and daily or recreational activities can be negatively influenced by gynecological pathologies. Sexual life and relationships with partners are often affected by the presence of gynecological conditions, especially if they cause infertility. From the effects of dysmenorrhea that occur since the teenage and until the onset of menopause symptoms, women frequently present throughout life a series of gynecological disorders such as endometriosis, infertility, uterine fibromatosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, pelvic organ prolapse, or urinary incontinence. Understanding the negative effects that these conditions have on quality of life can contribute to more efficient and personalized management of cases.

1. Introduction

Quality of life (QoL) is a complex concept that is based on the individual’s perception of their position in life, taking into account the culture and environment where they live, as well as the standards and expectations they have. Quality of life depends on a series of factors such as psychological state, physical health, social relationships, level of autonomy, and professional activities [1]. Quality of life has been an intensely debated topic since the 1940s, when health professionals realized that psychological and social factors are important for health, thanks to advances in medicine that have prolonged survival [2]. Over time, several instruments have been developed to assess patients’ quality of life, such as the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument (WHOQOL) [3,4], the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Survey [5], or the Duke Health Profile [6].
The World Health Organizations have emphasized the fact that attention must be paid to quality of life in every stage of life [7]. It has been reported that women have a lower quality of life than men because they are exposed to different social and cultural factors, such as different income, political, and social limitations, more family responsibilities, and difficulty accessing health services [8]. In addition, throughout life, women can face numerous gynecological conditions that have an effect on health, from menarche up to the postmenopausal period. Nowadays, nonmalignant gynecological conditions have an unclear epidemiology. Physical health and therefore quality of life can be affected by gynecological conditions such as uterine fibromatosis, adenomyosis, endometriosis, genital prolapse, or menopause [9]. Up to 90% of women face the onset of menstrual pain shortly after menarche, so their quality of life can be affected every month during the menstrual period from their teenage years [10]. Later in life, every woman experiences unpleasant symptoms of menopause, which usually occur between 45 and 55 years of age and which have negative effects on their quality of life [11].
We performed a literature review on the impact of gynecological conditions on patients’ quality of life, from the adolescent period to the postmenopausal period. Also, we present the available tools that can be used to evaluate the relationship between gynecological pathologies and quality of life. The objective of the study was to increase the attention paid to this very important and current topic and to highlight the importance of correct treatment in different gynecological conditions in order to avoid negative effects on quality of life. We present the effects of each pathology on the daily life of patients.
Nowadays, quality of life is a debated topic, and people are continuously attempting to identify the factors that negatively affect quality of life. We have reviewed the literature and selected articles that have analyzed the relationship between gynecological pathologies and quality of life in our times, which are dominated by stress and multiple activities that need to be managed. We conducted a synthesis of studies in the literature to provide a general, descriptive, and comprehensive perspective on this topic. We had a flexible approach without constraining the selection of studies by strict criteria. A possible limitation is that relevant studies in the literature may not have been included in our review.
A limitation of this literature review is that many of the questionnaires used to assess the impact of gynecological pathology on patients’ quality of life have not been translated and validated in all countries. This fact suggests that the comparability and applicability of the results across populations may be limited. Future studies are needed to adapt and validate these instruments cross-culturally. Our review provides an overview of the negative effects that gynecological pathologies can have on quality of life and presents some of the available methods of assessment.
Table 1 presents information about the most commonly used questionnaires for assessing the impact of gynecological pathology on patients’ quality of life and details about their translation and validation status in different languages.
This literature review did not specifically assess population factors such as ethnicity, culture, and religion and how they may influence symptom perception and reporting of quality of life outcomes. This is a limitation of our study and highlights the need for future studies that specifically address these variables.

2. Dysmenorrhea and Patients’ Quality of Life

Dysmenorrhea represents the presence of menstrual pain, one of the most common gynecological conditions in patients of reproductive age. Its worldwide prevalence varies between 16% and 91%. Severe menstrual pain was reported in 2 to 29% of cases [28,29]. Two types of dysmenorrhea were described: primary and secondary. Primary dysmenorrhea does not have an identifiable cause and appears most of the time shortly after menarche. Secondary dysmenorrhea was associated with numerous pelvic conditions such as endometriosis, uterine fibromatosis, or ovarian cysts [30,31]. The risk factors for dysmenorrhea are the familiar history of dysmenorrhea, heavy menstrual flow [32], young age at menarche, nulliparity [33], menstrual cycle irregularity, obesity, and smoking [34].
Menstrual pain usually lasts for 1–2 days and starts shortly before the onset of menstrual bleeding. In the case of young women, painful symptoms are underestimated and considered normal. Ineffective management of dysmenorrhea causes a poor quality of life for several days each month for women of reproductive age [33]. In a study that included 1349 medical students with dysmenorrhea, approximately 64.3% of them stated that dysmenorrhea affected their quality of life [35]. The same opinion was shared by 73.9% of the participants in a study that included a total of 422 women with dysmenorrhea between 18 and 45 years old. In this study by Amza et al., the DysmenQoL score was used to evaluate the impact of dysmenorrhea on quality of life. This tool proved to be a useful and valid method, but future studies are needed to reproduce its reliability and validity. The DismenoL score increased when the intensity of menstrual pain was greater [36]. Dysmenorrhea has negative effects on the quality of life of patients by affecting daily activities [37], professional or academic performance, social and couple relationships, physical or recreational activities, and sleep [38].
In an extensive study by Schoep et al., which included 42,879 women, it was observed that dysmenorrhea was present in 85% of the participants, and 1 out of 3 women included in the study stated that they used to change their daily activity schedule due to the presence of symptoms associated with menstruation [39]. Esan et al. conducted a study with 397 participants between the ages of 15 and 26; 12% of them stated that they were hospitalized due to menstrual pain, and 69.6% of participants considered that dysmenorrhea affected their mood [40]. Dysmenorrhea affects the academic performance of female students through loss of attention and inactivity in classes, absenteeism, the inability to do homework, and poor results in exams [41]. Sahin et al. reported that anxiety and depression levels were higher in adolescent girls with dysmenorrhea compared to those without this condition and were more pronounced if the pain was more intense [42]. Mizuta et al. evaluated the impact of dysmenorrhea on patients’ quality of life using the 26-item World Health Organization Quality of Life scale (QoL) and observed that the QoL score was statistically significantly lower in the case of severe menstrual pain [43]. Dysmenorrhea is also an economic issue because patients with this condition frequently need health care services and take large amounts of medication to reduce pain every month [44].
Table 2 shows the results of several studies that evaluated the impact of dysmenorrhea on patients’ quality of life.

3. Endometriosis and Patients’ Quality of Life

Endometriosis is defined as the presence of endometrial tissue (glands and stroma) outside the uterine cavity [51]. Endometriosis lesions can be superficial (peritoneal or ovarian) or deep infiltrating. The etiology of endometriosis is not completely known. There are several theories that attempt to explain the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, such as retrograde menstrual flow or Müllerian remnants that have not migrated and differentiated in fetal life [52,53].
In the United States and Canada, the prevalence of endometriosis varies between 5 and 15% among women of reproductive age. Although many patients are asymptomatic, endometriosis can cause unpleasant symptoms such as chronic pelvic pain in 6 to 10% of cases, infertility, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, or dyschezia [54]. Approximately one third of patients with endometriosis have infertility [55]. Approximately 2–4% of menopausal women have endometriosis. The decrease in estrogens after menopause can improve symptoms in these patients, but they can present non-specific symptoms that require additional and repeated investigations, because in this period of life, the presence of malignancies is suspected [56].
The non-specific symptomatology makes diagnosis difficult. It was reported in a study that included 1418 women of reproductive age, aged 18–45 years, that diagnosis was made with a delay of 6.7 years from the onset of symptoms to the surgical and pathological confirmation of endometriosis lesions. All this time, the women’s quality of life was affected by the presence of symptoms. Daily activities were affected, and working hours and productivity were reduced, which led to high costs for each woman [57]. Endometriosis is also an economic problem because in the United States annual costs of USD 16,573 have been reported for each woman diagnosed with this condition, three times more than in the case of women without endometriosis [58].
Endometriosis can have an impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with negative effects on social, psychological, or physical aspects of life for patients. In a meta-analysis by Sima et al., it was observed that the 36-item survey generic questionnaire (SF-36) represents an efficient tool for evaluating the quality of life of patients with endometriosis. They reported that physical functioning was the most affected parameter but showed significant improvements after surgical or hormonal treatment [59]. Specific questionnaires were developed to measure the impact of endometriosis on quality of life. The Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30) includes 30 questions divided into five categories: pain, social support, control and powerlessness, self-image, and emotional well-being [60]. The EHP-30 was implemented in 2001 and is currently available in over 56 certified translations. A systematic review that included 139 studies using the EHP supported the validity, reliability and wide acceptability of this questionnaire [17]. The Endocare questionnaire (ECQ) measures the patient-centeredness of endometriosis, meaning that women can evaluate their experiences with health services and certain aspects can be improved in specific clinics [61,62]. In a systematic review by D’Alterio et al., which included 37 studies, it was observed that SF-36 and EHP-30 were the most frequently used questionnaires for evaluating the impact of endometriosis on quality of life. In addition, both medical and surgical treatment have been reported to reduce pain and improve quality of life, so treatment methods must be personalized and take into account the patient’s wishes [63].
In Table 3, the results of studies evaluating the impact of endometriosis on patients’ quality of life are presented.

4. Infertility and Patients’ Quality of Life

Infertility is a common problem nowadays, and it is associated with the presence of diseases of the reproductive system, but it is also closely related to social and psychological factors. Infertility is defined as the impossibility of a couple to conceive after 12 months of regular sexual intercourse. Two types of infertility have been described: primary (a couple without pregnancy history) and secondary [69]. The prevalence of infertility worldwide varies between 12.6% and 17.5%, which means approximately one in six couples. Higher rates have been reported in America, Europe, Western Pacific, and Africa [70].
Negative emotional experiences are common among infertile couples, and most of the time, quality of life is low. These things can also be influenced by the culture of a country, by traditional social concepts, by access to counseling and health services, and by the high cost of treatments. Resilience is very important in the impact of infertility on the quality of life of patients [71]. Infertility is also an economic problem. Rural/urban residency areas, monthly income, and educational status influence the impact of infertility on quality of life. Women with infertility who live in rural areas present a lower quality of life from an economic, psychological, and emotional point of view [72].
Infertility can influence the quality of life of patients through the appearance of difficulties in marital life, dysfunction in sexual relationships, or psychological problems. A meta-analysis by Nik Hazlina et al. evaluated the psychological impact that infertility can have on women. Compared to the general population, women with infertility have a 60% higher risk of psychological distress, a 60% higher risk of anxiety, and a 40% higher risk of depression [73]. In a study that included 100 nulliparous patients with infertility between 20 and 38 years old and 100 patients in the control group, the impact of infertility on patients was evaluated using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire and the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). A significantly lower quality of life in infertile women was reported in the physical, social, psychological, and environmental domains (p < 0.001). The number of women with anxiety, stress, and depression was significantly higher in the group of infertile women [74].
The FertiQoL (Fertility Quality of Life) questionnaire represents a specific, valid, and reliable tool used to evaluate quality of life among both women and men experiencing infertility. The impact of infertility on the quality of life of patients can be affected by the duration and type of infertility, as well as by the reason for infertility [75]. An increase in the duration of infertility was associated with a decrease in FertiQoL scores. Patients with infertility can feel inferior in the relationships they have with people who have children or may experience hopeless feelings [76]. A study by Dourou et al., which included 101 couples with fertility problems and used The Demographic Information and Medical History Questionnaire and the FertiQoL questionnaire, reported that the higher the level of stress and anxiety, the greater the decrease in quality of life observed among patients with infertility. The number of conflicts in infertile couples has increased. Infertility can cause problems with social interactions. Some women with infertility present behavioral or cognitive problems [77]. A study by Wdowiak et al. included 1200 patients treated for infertility who completed the FertiQoL questionnaire. Women who were treated without the use of assisted reproductive technology (non-ART) had significantly lower scores on four subscales of FertiQoL (emotional, partnership, biological, and attitude towards treatment) compared to patients who received IVF. In addition, quality of life was influenced by whether the women had children from other relationships, as well as professional activity [78]. Before and during treatment, higher degrees of general distress and anxiety were experienced by women when the infertility was of only a female cause. These data should be considered by health service providers, as they show the importance of psychological support in cases of infertile couples [79].

5. Menopause and Patients’ Quality of Life

Menopause is the permanent cessation of menstruation for a continuous period of at least 12 months. The reduction in the serum level of estrogen determines the appearance of menopause symptoms: anxiety, depression, sleep problems, changes in metabolism, urogenital symptoms, sexual dysfunction, musculoskeletal symptoms, and vasomotor symptoms [80].
In a study by Baral et al., approximately 51.4% of menopausal women presented with symptoms that decreased quality of life. Educational attainment, treatment for the health problems, alcohol intake status, and physical activity were significant factors in determining the quality of life of these women [81]. In addition to the decrease in quality of life, women with menopausal symptoms presented higher health care utilization and work impairment compared to women who did not have menopausal symptoms. Health outcomes were associated with anxiety and depression [82]. Practicing regular physical exercises can lead to an increase in quality of life in menopausal women, while being overweight has the opposite effect [83,84]. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) is used to evaluate the severity of menopause symptoms in three categories: urogenital, vasomotor, and psychological symptoms. A negative correlation was observed between MRS total scores and the scores for QoL evaluated using WHOQOL-BREF. The level of monthly family income and educational level of menopausal women were positively correlated with QoL total scores [85]. Menopausal women are a well-represented group from an economic point of view in the workplace. A systematic review showed that age, type of work, educational level, working environment, menopausal symptoms, permanent place of residency, comorbidities, and mental factors affect quality of life at work [86].
The MENQOL questionnaire (Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire) is a tool used to evaluate how menopause influences quality of life. It involves the evaluation of 29 symptoms experienced, divided into four domains: vasomotor, psychological, physical, and sexual [87,88]. In a study by Barati et al. that included 270 postmenopausal women, MENQOL was used to assess the prevalence of menopausal symptoms and the factors involved in affecting the quality of life of postmenopausal women. It was observed that vasomotor symptoms were the most frequent: hot flushes or flashes (75.9%) and night sweats and sweating (59.3%). It has been reported that quitting smoking and increasing one’s level of physical activity or intake of omega 3 fatty acids lead to an improvement in quality of life in menopausal patients [89]. The results of a systematic review by Jenabi et al. showed that SF-36 and MENQOL are the most used questionnaires for evaluating the quality of life of menopausal patients [90].

6. Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Patients’ Quality of Life

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has an incidence ranging from 2 to 50%. This is defined as a change in the pelvic organs to descend from the anatomical position towards the vaginal introitus or beyond it, due to the loss of support provided by muscles and connective tissue. Elderly women may experience various symptoms such as pelvic pressure, urinary and bowel dysfunction, vaginal bulge, and sexual dysfunction. POP represents a major health problem, especially in underdeveloped countries. Primary and secondary POP prevention measures should be part of routine practice for health care providers [91,92]. The prevalence of surgeries for prolapse varies a lot and reaches a peak between 60 and 69 years [93]. Factors associated with the appearance of POP are older age, familiar history of POP, obesity, high parity, forceps delivery, home delivery, prolonged labor, chronic constipation, performing heavy work, vaginal trauma, and a history of perineal tear. Women with POP report impaired daily activity and low productivity. POP affects sexual, physical, psychological, and social functions in women [94].
POP affects the daily activities of women; despite this, it often remains untreated. In a study that included 521 patients clinically diagnosed with POP, 60.8% of them stated that the symptoms associated with POP moderately or severely affected their quality of life and 47.8% of them considered that daily activities were moderately or severely affected in terms of their homework or job, hygiene, and social life. A significant percentage of women with POP (44.3%) claimed that they had had symptoms for more than 5 years, and 17.5% stated that they also had symptoms associated with urinary incontinence [95].
Even if POP does not represent a life-threatening condition, it is associated with significant morbidity. Women with POP show increased distress and a low quality of life. The intensity of the symptoms and the evaluation of quality of life among women with POP are very important for the establishment of treatment and for the development of new treatment methods. The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form (PFIQ-7) and the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory short form (PFDI-20) represent specific questionnaires that evaluate the symptoms of pelvic floor disorders and their impact on quality of life [96]. The Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QoL) represents a valid, feasible, and simple method for evaluating POP symptoms and the impact they have on patients’ quality of life. The questionnaire includes 20 questions grouped into nine domains that cover general health, physical and social limitations, personal relationships, prolapse impact, sleep/energy disturbance, emotional problems, and roles limitations, as well as the evaluation of symptom severity [97]. Women diagnosed with POP may have limitations regarding their physical activities, household, job, ability to travel, social life, relationships with partners, and sexual activity. These women may show symptoms of depression, anxiety, and nervousness, feel bad about themselves, and have impaired sleep [98,99].
The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction has been estimated at 30–50% in the general population, and among women with pelvic floor disorders, it has been reported to be higher, approximately 50–83%. The reduction in sexual activity in these women may be due to the opinion they have about the appearance of the genital area in pelvic organ prolapse, coital incontinence, and dyspareunia in urinary incontinence or the fear of dirt in anal incontinence. Pelvic floor muscle training and native tissue repair in POP are associated with an improvement in sexual function. Vaginal mesh repair and levatorplasty could increase the incidence of dyspareunia, while subtotal hysterectomy do not show an improvement in sexual function compared to total hysterectomy. Contradictory effects on sexual function have been reported with the use of vaginal pessaries in POP [100]. Pessaries are a conservative treatment method for POP and can be used as a first line of treatment, especially in patients with associated pathologies (diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular disease). The ring pessary is easy to remove and reinsert, has a good rate of prolapse reduction, and is the most common type of vaginal pessary. Vaginal erosion and discharge are adverse effects that may cause patients to stop using pessaries. Some patients choose to have surgical treatment for POP after a period of using pessaries [101]. There are two main categories of pessaries: long-term wear pessaries, which are removed only during specialist visits, and daily control pessaries, which are removed and reinserted daily. The choice of pessary type depends on socioeconomic, demographic, and functional health-related factors. It has been observed that sexually active patients have chosen to use the daily control cube pessary [102]. Vaginal pessaries have been associated with improved quality of life, sexual function, vaginal symptoms, and mental health [103,104]. On the other hand, it has been reported that the use of vaginal pessaries is not associated with changes in the sexual function of patients. Ring pessaries are compatible with sexual activity [105]. If partners find the pessary uncomfortable or impairing sexual function, it can be removed and reinserted as needed [106]. In a review by Wharton et al., the results showed that there was no deterioration or negative change in sexual function in women with POP who used pessaries as a treatment method [107]. In a study by Carlin et al. that included 130 postmenopausal women, a significant improvement in the “sexual function” domain was observed after pelvic floor surgery compared to the use of vaginal pessaries for three months [108].
Pelvic floor therapy is a conservative alternative treatment for POP, and it involves performing exercises to improve control, strength, and relaxation of the pelvic floor muscles. This therapy may include home exercise programs, biofeedback or electrical stimulation, behavioral education, or manual therapy [109]. Pelvic floor physiotherapy has been associated with increasing pubococcygeus tonicity with a reduction in symptoms associated with POP, increasing quality of life, and improving sexual function in these patients. It has been observed that the combined use of physiotherapy techniques (Kegel exercises and electrostimulation) can cause significant changes in sexual function such as increased libido or arousal and improvements to orgasm and dyspareunia [110]. Pelvic floor muscle training can improve sexual function by increasing the strength and endurance of the pelvic floor muscles [111]. Electrical stimulation biofeedback therapy uses electrical impulses to stimulate pelvic nerve fibers in order to improve the function of the pelvic neuromuscular system. Pelvic floor exercises combined with electrical stimulation biofeedback therapy can have positive effects on POP symptoms, improve quality of life, and improve sexual function [112].
The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire—International Urogynecologic Association (IUGA) Revised (PISQ-IR) evaluates the impact of symptoms associated with pelvic floor disorders on the sexual function of women who are or are not sexually active and includes arousal/orgasm, condition-specific, desire-related, partner-related, condition impact, and global quality rating questions [113,114]. A study by Rusavy et al. included 333 patients with POP stage ≥2 who underwent laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and completed the PISQ-IR before and one year after surgery. It was found that the prevalence of dyspareunia decreased and the general scores for sexual functions showed improvement one year after surgery [115].

7. Urinary Disorders and Patients’ Quality of Life

Urinary incontinence (UI) is defined as the involuntary leakage of urine. It affects millions of people worldwide and it has underestimated negative effects on personal well-being. It is more common in women than in men. Its prevalence cannot be assessed correctly; it is estimated that approximately one in four people may present with urinary incontinence throughout their lives. Most of the time, patients consider that the involuntary leakage of urine is something normal as they become older, and they are ashamed to recognize its presence [116]. Urinary incontinence can have negative effects on patients’ quality of life through its impact on sexual function, social life, and relationships with friends. Patients with urinary incontinence may have unpleasant feelings (“wet”, “dirty”, “smelly”) and may thus limit their physical or social activities such as shopping, dancing, or going out with friends. Patients can also present with low self-esteem, decreased sexual desire, a desire for isolation, and signs of depression [117].
Three types of UI have been described: urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). SUI involves the involuntary loss of urine when abdominal pressure increases during exercise, laughing, or coughing. UUI involves strong micturition urgency unrelated to the level of bladder fullness that causes urine loss. MUI combines symptoms of the other two types of urinary incontinence [118]. The quality of life of women with UI decreases with the severity of the symptoms and varies according to the type of UI. It has been observed that UUI decreases the quality of life of women the most. There are also other factors that influence the quality of life in women with UI, such as age, associated medical conditions, treatments, and duration of symptoms. However, a small proportion of women seek health care for this pathology [119]. In a study by AlQuaiz et al., women with SUI or UUI were more likely to report moderate/severe mental distress. Meanwhile, women with UUI or severe urinary distress reported more frequent or decreased self-esteem [120]. The results of a study by Chow et al., which included 4208 women with SUI over 40 years of age, showed that frequent episodes of SUI were associated with a more severe quality of life impairment in mental and physical health domains [121]. Urogynecological procedures for the treatment of UI in women do not always improve quality of life. Age and time since surgery are important for determining quality of life. Most of the time, surgery in elderly patients does not bring about beneficial effects [122].

8. Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome and Patients’ Quality of Life

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in women of reproductive age. This is characterized by the presence of hyperandrogenism and oligoovulation or anovulation, which can cause infertility and metabolic disorders [123,124]. PCOS symptoms produce high stress and can have negative psychological or sexual effects and can affect social well-being [125]. Mental distress in these women occurs due to the presence of irregular periods, physical appearance, or infertility and thus can affect quality of life. Increased BMI, educational status, menstrual irregularities, and marital status represent factors that influence quality of life in patients with PCOS [126]. Women who have severe or more severe symptoms of PCOS have a lower quality of life compared to those who have mild symptoms. Women who consider that they have a lower quality of life face a feeling of a lack of control over the disease, do not accept their physical appearance, and present depressive symptoms [127].
The PCOS Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (PCOSQ) is a specific tool used to evaluate the negative impact of PCOS on the quality of life of patients. The PCOSQ has five domains: emotions, menstrual problems, body hair, weight, and infertility problems [128,129,130]. In a systematic review by Bazarganipour et al., it was shown that menstruation and hirsutism were the domains that most affect quality of life in PCOS patients [131]. Women with irregular periods or hirsutism may feel less feminine than other women. Up to 90% of women diagnosed with PCOS consider facial hair to be a problem (reporting feelings like “different”, “unfeminine”, “strange”), and their physical appearance can make young females feel less sexually attractive. Anxiety, depression, fatigue, and sleep problems can affect the quality of life of women with PCOS [132].
Women with PCOS had both a low quality of life and a low satisfaction with life, which were influenced by socioeconomic standing, the time since PCOS diagnosis, and BMI. In addition, quality of life was influenced by age and professional activity, and satisfaction with life was influenced by having children [133]. It was observed that the practice of regular physical exercises had beneficial effects on the quality of life of PCOS patients by improving the ovulation rate, leading to reduction in mental disorders, increasing menstrual regularity, or leading to weight loss [134]. Another essential element for improving the quality of life of PCOS patients is an adequate diet. A low-calorie diet is recommended, with a low intake of high-glycemic-index carbohydrates and saturated fatty acids, but with an increase in the intake of polyunsaturated fatty acids and fiber [127]. The most effective diet in reducing PCOS-related symptoms has been shown to be the Mediterranean diet, which includes large amounts of omega-3 fatty acids, which maintains low blood glucose and triglyceride levels but at the same time reduces androgen bioavailability. Other diets that have the potential to improve symptoms associated with PCOS are the high-fat ketogenic diet and lactose-free diet [135]. In addition to dietary changes and regular physical activity, other factors have been identified that are useful in improving the quality of life of patients with PCOS, such as behavioral interventions, reducing alcohol intake, and smoking, but also psychological approaches (management of anxiety, depression, sexual dysfunction, or negative self-image), optimizing sleep, and traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (inositol supplementation, vitamins, and minerals) [136].

9. Uterine Fibromatosis and Patients’ Quality of Life

Uterine fibromatosis is the most common gynecological pathology in women of reproductive age, and it can be diagnosed in up to 70–80% of women during their lifetime. Abnormal uterine bleeding, pelvic pain, constipation, and infertility are the most common symptoms of uterine fibromatosis. It represents a real health and economic problem due to the high costs required for health care [137,138]. Uterine fibromatosis significantly affects the quality of life of patients, as well as mental health. It has been observed that all therapeutic interventions (surgical, medical, and radiological) used to treat uterine fibromatosis led to a decrease in the severity of the symptoms and improved quality of life and mental health [139]. In a study by Hervé et al., approximately 64% of participants stated that uterine fibromatosis moderately to severely affected their quality of life [140]. The results of a study by Koga et al. showed that anemia is a predictor factor for the decrease in quality of life due to the presence of uterine fibromatosis [141].
The Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life Questionnaire (UFS-QOL) is a specific instrument with 37 questions that evaluates the symptoms associated with uterine fibromatosis, as well as their impact on quality of life. This questionnaire includes seven subscales: symptom severity, energy/mood, concern, activities, self-consciousness, sexual function, and control [142]. In a systematic review that analyzed the use of the UFS-QOL, it was observed that medical, surgical, or radiological treatment was associated with a decrease in severity scores for symptoms and with an improvement in quality of life [139].
Uterine fibromatosis can have a negative impact on the quality of life of women by decreasing productivity, affecting relationships and social life, and altering self-image and sexuality, as well as physical wellness [143]. It has been reported that uterine fibromatosis has a significant psychological impact on women, who may experience feelings of fear, anger, anxiety, or depression. In a study by Ghant et al., it was observed that more than half of the participants considered that they had no control over their disease and felt helpless. Women with uterine fibromatosis had lower self-esteem and considered themselves less attractive [144]. Also, uterine fibromatosis can affect professional activities. In a study by Borah et al., which included 968 participants with uterine fibromatosis, 28% of them stated that they were missing work due to uterine fibromatosis symptoms, and 24% of participants considered that the symptoms prevented them from reaching their career potential [145]. Another study with 841 participants with uterine fibromatosis reported that women had many concerns about uterine fibromatosis, such as the growth of fibroids (77%), the occurrence of possible complications (61), the need to perform a hysterectomy in the future (54%), or their evolution into cancer (53%). Approximately 52% of the participants were worried that uterine fibromatosis would affect their sex life or their relationship with their partner (42%) [146].

10. Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and Patients’ Quality of Life

Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) may affect up to 30% of women of reproductive age and is described as a change in the duration and frequency of menstruation or the amount of blood lost (heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB)). It may occur as a result of a functional or anatomical abnormality or a systemic disease. Abnormal uterine bleeding has been observed to have a negative effect on the quality of life of patients and can cause insufficiency in the workplace, and its treatment can be a problem for health services. Menorrhagia has been associated with negative effects on physical, psychological, and social health, family life, work, and daily activities [147]. The severity of menorrhagia is associated with the extent of negative effects on patients’ quality of life [148]. HMB has also been associated with affecting energy, mood, self-consciousness, and sexual function [149]. The results of a study using the SF-36 showed that women with HMB had significantly lower scores in all domains for quality of life compared to women with normal menstrual bleeding [150]. HMB can cause iron deficiency anemia, and this has been significantly associated with shortness of breath or feeling tired during the menstrual period [151].
Adenomyosis is one of the most common causes of HMB and is characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue in the myometrium. Its prevalence increases with age and is higher in perimenopause or multiparous women. However, it can also be diagnosed in adolescents or young women who present with HMB or dysmenorrhea. HMB is underestimated and underreported in adolescents but can have a negative effect on their quality of life [152]. In one third of cases, adenomyosis is asymptomatic, but, depending on the intensity of symptoms (AUB, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, possibly infertility), it can affect the quality of life of patients. This condition can be associated with an early onset in adolescence, and the intensity and severity of symptoms can increase over time. Adenomyosis is often associated with endometriosis, a common cause of chronic pelvic pain. Early non-invasive diagnosis (ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging) should be encouraged for optimal management of this pathology to improve long-term outcomes and patients’ quality of life [153]. Adenomyosis can cause disabling symptoms and is associated with increased health care utilization. In young women, medical treatment is the first line of treatment. But in the long term, these therapies are limited compared to hysterectomy [154]. The quality of life of patients with adenomyosis is low and is associated with negative effects on mental and physical health. Patients with adenomyosis are at higher risk of depression and anxiety compared to patients with uterine fibroids [155]. Adenomyosis has been associated with decreased productivity at work and impairment in both daily and professional activities [156].

11. Other Gynecological Pathologies and Patients’ Quality of Life

From menarche to menopause, women face a series of gynecological pathologies that can influence their lives in many aspects and can have repercussions in several areas: school, work, sexuality, and psychology. In Table 4, we briefly present the negative effects of the gynecological pathologies presented above.
In addition to the gynecological pathologies presented above, there are other conditions or symptoms related to the genitourinary system that influence various aspects of patients’ quality of life.
Vulvovaginitis can be considered a public health problem, considering the discomfort it creates and the alterations to well-being and patients’ quality of life [157]. Bacterial vaginosis is one of the most common conditions in women of reproductive age. Its presence has been associated with a negative impact on sexual, physical, and mental health [158]. Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) affects millions of women throughout their lives. This pathology requires special attention because it has been associated with a decrease in patients’ satisfaction with their health and their perception of their quality of life. RVVC had negative effects on physical and psychological well-being but also on sexual activity [159,160].
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are very common among sexually active women of reproductive age, and effects can range from physical symptoms to social, financial, and psychological effects [161]. Patients with recurrent UTIs may experience anxiety generated by the sudden, distressing, and unpredictable nature of the symptoms generated by a new episode of UTI. Social life may be impaired, and signs of depression may appear. An even more significant negative impact is observed among women with UI, whose symptoms are exacerbated by urinary UTIs. It has been observed that the use of methods of prevention for the occurrence of new episodes of UTIs can improve quality of life among these patients [162]. It was observed that urinary tract infection symptoms were associated with a series of negative emotions (helplessness and fear) and influenced relationships with others, daily activities, and sleep. Treatment failure was associated with anger and frustration [163].
Chronic pelvic pain is a multifactorial and complex condition. It affects approximately 14% of women throughout their lives and involves high costs to the health system, as well as impairments in functional capacity and quality of life. Chronic pelvic pain has been associated with gynecological, urological, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, neurological, and psychological pathologies. The gynecological conditions most associated with chronic pelvic pain are endometriosis, adenomyosis, and fibroids [164], which have been discussed extensively in this review. The use of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire showed that the presence of chronic pelvic pain was associated with lower scores in the psychological, social relationship, physical health, and environment domains [165].

12. Conclusions

Nowadays, quality of life is an important topic, and we must pay more attention to the factors or conditions that can negatively affect it. From adolescence to postmenopause, women face a series of gynecological conditions that can significantly reduce their quality of life through negative psychological and social effects, by affecting relationships, sexual life, and academic or professional activities and by limiting daily activities. From the effects of dysmenorrhea that occur from the teenage years until the onset of menopause symptoms, women frequently present with a series of gynecological disorders such as endometriosis, uterine fibromatosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, pelvic organ prolapse, or urinary incontinence. We conducted a literature review to provide a general, descriptive, and comprehensive perspective on this topic. The flexible approach of a narrative review may result in relevant studies not being included, and variations due to population-based factors (ethnicity, culture, or religion) may not be fully discussed.
Understanding the negative effects that these conditions have on quality of life can contribute to more efficient and personalized management of cases. Health care providers should be aware of the impact of gynecological pathology on quality of life. They should have a focused discussion on this topic with patients, so that the most appropriate treatment method can be chosen. The quality of life of patients should be a priority for health care providers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.A. and B.H.H.; resources, A.-S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P. and N.G.; writing—review and editing, R.-M.S. and A.-A.C.; visualization, M.-O.P.; supervision, L.P.; project administration, G.-P.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

Publication of this paper was supported by the University of Medicine Pharmacy Carol Davila, through the institutional program Publish not Perish.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pequeno, N.P.F.; Cabral, N.L.A.; Marchioni, D.M.; Lima, S.C.V.C.; Lyra, C.O. Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: A systematic review of population-based studies. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2020, 18, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  2. Gehlert, S.; Chang, C.H.; Bock, R.D.; Hartlage, S.A. The WOMQOL instrument measured quality of life in women of reproductive age with no known pathology. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2006, 59, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vahedi, S. World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF): Analyses of Their Item Response Theory Properties Based on the Graded Responses Model. Iran J. Psychiatry 2010, 5, 140–153. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  4. Ilić, I.; Šipetić-Grujičić, S.; Grujičić, J.; Živanović Mačužić, I.; Kocić, S.; Ilić, M. Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF), Questionnaire in Medical Students. Medicina 2019, 55, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Stewart, M. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Aust. J. Physiother. 2007, 53, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Parkerson, G.R., Jr.; Eisenson, H.J.; Campbell, C. Testing the Duke Population Health Profile (Duke-PH) in a Sample of Community Health Center Patients. Front. Public Health 2019, 7, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  7. Phyo, A.Z.Z.; Freak-Poli, R.; Craig, H.; Gasevic, D.; Stocks, N.P.; Gonzalez-Chica, D.A.; Ryan, J. Quality of life and mortality in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  8. Lee, K.H.; Xu, H.; Wu, B. Gender differences in quality of life among community-dwelling older adults in low- and middle-income countries: Results from the Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hoffman, S.R.; Farland, L.V.; Doll, K.M.; Nicholson, W.K.; Wright, M.A.; Robinson, W.R. The epidemiology of gynaecologic health: Contemporary opportunities and challenges. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2020, 75, 398–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  10. Horvat, M.; Pavan Jukić, D.; Marinović, L.; Bursać, D.; Ribić, R.; Neuberg, M.; Bursać, D. Prevalence of Primary Dysmenorrhoea and Its Impact on Academic Performance among Croatian Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Obstet. Gynecol. Int. 2023, 2023, 2953762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  11. Erdélyi, A.; Pálfi, E.; Tűű, L.; Nas, K.; Szűcs, Z.; Török, M.; Jakab, A.; Várbíró, S. The Importance of Nutrition in Menopause and Perimenopause—A Review. Nutrients 2024, 16, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bat-Erdene, E.; Tumurbaatar, E.; Tumur-Ochir, G.; Jamiyandorj, O.; Jadamba, T.; Yamamoto, E.; Hamajima, N.; Oka, T.; Lkhagvasuren, B. Validation of the abbreviated version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life in Mongolia: A population-based cross-sectional study among adults in Ulaanbaatar. Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 2023, 85, 79–92. [Google Scholar] [PubMed Central]
  13. Hoopman, R.; Terwee, C.B.; Devillé, W.; Knol, D.L.; Aaronson, N.K. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the SF-36 health survey for use among Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority populations in the Netherlands. Qual. Life Res. 2009, 18, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  14. Baumann, C.; Erpelding, M.L.; Perret-Guillaume, C.; Gautier, A.; Régat, S.; Collin, J.F.; Guillemin, F.; Briançon, S. Health-related quality of life in French adolescents and adults: Norms for the DUKE Health Profile. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  15. Guillemin, F.; Paul-Dauphin, A.; Virion, J.M.; Bouchet, C.; Briançon, S. Le Profil de santé de DUKE: Un instrument générique de mesure de qualité de vie liée à la santé [The DUKE health profile: A generic instrument to measure the quality of life tied to health]. Sante Publique 1997, 9, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [PubMed][Green Version]
  16. Tran, P.L.; Leigh Blizzard, C.; Srikanth, V.; Hanh, V.T.; Lien, N.T.; Thang, N.H.; Gall, S.L. Health-related quality of life after stroke: Reliability and validity of the Duke Health Profile for use in Vietnam. Qual. Life Res. 2015, 24, 2807–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jones, G.L.; Budds, K.; Taylor, F.; Musson, D.; Raymer, J.; Churchman, D.; Kennedy, S.H.; Jenkinson, C. A systematic review to determine use of the Endometriosis Health Profiles to measure quality of life outcomes in women with endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2024, 30, 186–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nogueira-Silva, C.; Costa, P.; Martins, C.; Barata, S.; Alho, C.; Calhaz-Jorge, C.; Osório, F. Validation of the Portuguese Version of EHP-30 (The Endometriosis Health Profile-30). Acta Med. Port. 2015, 28, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Darici, E.; Kemahlı, M.N.C.; Bahat, P.Y.; Yücel, B.; Oral, E. Validation of the Turkish version of Endometriosis Health Profile questionnaire (EHP-30) to evaluate the quality of life in women with endometriosis. Facts Views Vis. Obgyn. 2023, 15, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  20. Grundström, H.; Rauden, A.; Wikman, P.; Olovsson, M. Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the 30-item endometriosis health profile (EHP-30). BMC Women’s Health 2020, 20, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  21. Al Obeisat, S.; Hayajneh, A.; Hweidi, I.; Abujilban, S.; Mrayan, L.; Alfar, R.; Nashwan, A.; Hweidi, L.I. Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) questionnaire tested on infertile couples in Jordan. BMC Women’s Health 2023, 23, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  22. Woods, B.M.; Bray, L.A.; Campbell, S.; Holland, A.; Mrug, S.; Ladores, S. A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2023, 21, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  23. Boivin, J.; Takefman, J.; Braverman, A. The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: Development and general psychometric properties. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 2084–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  24. Papadima, E.I.; Boutsiadis, A.; Soldatou, A.; Ivanidou, S.; Vassilakou, T.; Michala, L. Linguistic translation and validation of the Menopause-specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire in Greek menopausal women. Menopause 2020, 27, 808–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nie, G.; Yang, H.; Liu, J.; Zhao, C.; Wang, X. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Menopause-Specific Quality-of-Life questionnaire. Menopause 2017, 24, 546–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ghazanfarpour, M.; Kaviani, M.; Rezaiee, M.; Ghaderi, E.; Zandvakili, F. Cross cultural adaptation of the menopause specific questionnaire into the persian language. Ann. Med. Health Sci. Res. 2014, 4, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  27. Chuang, F.C.; Chu, L.C.; Kung, F.T.; Huang, K.H. Validation of the traditional Chinese version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QOL) in a Mandarin-speaking Taiwanese population. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 55, 680–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ghandour, R.; Hammoudeh, W.; Stigum, H.; Giacaman, R.; Fjeld, H.; Holmboe-Ottesen, G. The hidden burden of dysmenorrhea among adolescent girls in Palestine refugee camps: A focus on well-being and academic performance. BMC Public Health 2024, 24, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  29. Bajalan, Z.; Moafi, F.; MoradiBaglooei, M.; Alimoradi, Z. Mental health and primary dysmenorrhea: A systematic review. J. Psychosom. Obs. Gynaecol. 2019, 40, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, L.; Yan, Y.; Qiu, H.; Xu, D.; Zhu, J.; Liu, J.; Li, H. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Primary Dysmenorrhea in Students: A Meta-Analysis. Value Health 2022, 25, 1678–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Dong, Y.; Li, M.J.; Hong, Y.Z.; Li, W.J. Insight into Dysmenorrhea Research from 1992 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis. J. Pain Res. 2023, 16, 3591–3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  32. Karout, S.; Soubra, L.; Rahme, D.; Karout, L.; Khojah, H.M.J.; Itani, R. Prevalence, risk factors, and management practices of primary dysmenorrhea among young females. BMC Women’s Health 2021, 21, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  33. Guimarães, I.; Póvoa, A.M. Primary Dysmenorrhea: Assessment and Treatment. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2020, 42, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  34. Mammo, M.; Alemayehu, M.; Ambaw, G. Prevalence of Primary Dysmenorrhea, Its Intensity and Associated Factors Among Female Students at High Schools of Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study Design. Int. J. Women’s Health 2022, 14, 1569–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sima, R.M.; Sulea, M.; Radosa, J.C.; Findeklee, S.; Hamoud, B.H.; Popescu, M.; Gorecki, G.P.; Bobircă, A.; Bobirca, F.; Cirstoveanu, C.; et al. The Prevalence, Management and Impact of Dysmenorrhea on Medical Students’ Lives-A Multicenter Study. Healthcare 2022, 10, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  36. Amza, M.; Findeklee, S.; Haj Hamoud, B.; Sima, R.-M.; Poenaru, M.-O.; Popescu, M.; Pleș, L. Dysmenorrhea and Its Impact on Patients’ Quality of Life—A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Vlachou, E.; Owens, D.A.; Lavdaniti, M.; Kalemikerakis, J.; Evagelou, E.; Margari, N.; Fasoi, G.; Evangelidou, E.; Govina, O.; Tsartsalis, A.N. Prevalence, wellbeing, and symptoms of dysmenorrhea among university nursing students in Greece. Diseases 2019, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Iacovides, S.; Avidon, I.; Baker, F.C. What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: A critical review. Hum. Reprod. Update 2015, 21, 762–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Schoep, M.E.; Nieboer, T.E.; van der Zanden, M.; Braat, D.D.; Nap, A.W. The impact of menstrual symptoms on everyday life: A survey among 42,879 women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 220, 569.e1–569.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Esan, D.T.; Ariyo, S.A.; Akinlolu, E.A.; Akingbade, O.; Olabisi, O.I.; Olawade, D.B.; Bamigboye, T.O.; Ogunfowokan, A.A. Prevalence of dysmenorrhea and its effect on the quality of life of female undergraduate students in Nigeria. J. Endometr. Uterine Disord. 2024, 5, 100059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mesele, T.T.; Ayalew, H.G.; Syoum, A.T.; Antehneh, T.A. Impact of Dysmenorrhea on Academic Performance Among Haramaya University Undergraduate Regular Students, Eastern Ethiopia. Front. Reprod. Health 2022, 4, 939035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  42. Sahin, N.; Kasap, B.; Kirli, U.; Yeniceri, N.; Topal, Y. Assessment of anxiety-depression levels and perceptions of quality of life in adolescents with dysmenorrhea. Reprod. Health 2018, 15, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mizuta, R.; Maeda, N.; Tashiro, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Oda, S.; Komiya, M.; Urabe, Y. Quality of life by dysmenorrhea severity in young and adult Japanese females: A web-based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0283130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  44. MacGregor, B.; Allaire, C.; Bedaiwy, M.A.; Yong, P.J.; Bougie, O. Disease Burden of Dysmenorrhea: Impact on Life Course Potential. Int. J. Women’s Health 2023, 15, 499–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  45. Hailemeskel, S.; Demissie, A.; Assefa, N. Primary dysmenorrhea magnitude, associated risk factors, and its effect on academic performance: Evidence from female university students in Ethiopia. Int. J. Women’s Health 2016, 8, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  46. Fathi, M.; Davoodi, P.; Semyari, N.; Ildarabadi, A.; Fayazi, N.; Mahdinejad, S.; Jafari, F.; Ebrahimiantabrizi, A.; Asadibideshki, Z.L. Dysmenorrhea and Quality of Life: A Cross-sectional Survey Among Medical Students. Interv. Pain Med. Neuromod. 2022, 2, e132793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Unsal, A.; Ayranci, U.; Tozun, M.; Arslan, G.; Calik, E. Prevalence of dysmenorrhea and its effect on quality of life among a group of female university students. Ups. J. Med. Sci. 2010, 115, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mohamed, H.E.; Mansour, S.E. The effect of dysmenorrhea on quality of life of technical secondary schools girls. Med. J. Cairo Univ. 2013, 81, 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hashim, R.T.; Alkhalifah, S.S.; Alsalman, A.A.; Alfaris, D.M.; Alhussaini, M.A.; Qasim, R.S.; Shaik, S.A. Prevalence of primary dysmenorrhea and its effect on the quality of life amongst female medical students at King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional study. Saudi Med. J. 2020, 41, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  50. Chia, C.F.; Lai, J.H.; Cheung, P.K.; Kwong, L.T.; Lau, F.P.; Leung, K.H.; Leung, M.T.; Wong, F.C.; Ngu, S.F. Dysmenorrhoea among Hong Kong university students: Prevalence, impact, and management. Hong Kong Med. J. 2013, 19, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Christ, J.P.; Yu, O.; Schulze-Rath, R.; Grafton, J.; Hansen, K.; Reed, S.D. Incidence, prevalence, and trends in endometriosis diagnosis: A United States population-based study from 2006 to 2015. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021, 225, 500.e1–500.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Parasar, P.; Ozcan, P.; Terry, K.L. Endometriosis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Curr. Obstet. Gynecol. Rep. 2017, 6, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  53. Burney, R.O.; Giudice, L.C. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 98, 511–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  54. Moradi, Y.; Shams-Beyranvand, M.; Khateri, S.; Gharahjeh, S.; Tehrani, S.; Varse, F.; Tiyuri, A.; Najmi, Z. A systematic review on the prevalence of endometriosis in women. Indian J. Med. Res. 2021, 154, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  55. Santulli, P.; Bourdon, M.; Presse, M.; Gayet, V.; Marcellin, L.; Prunet, C.; de Ziegler, D.; Chapron, C. Endometriosis-related infertility: Assisted reproductive technology has no adverse impact on pain or quality-of-life scores. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 105, 978–987.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Dinu, M.D.; Haj Hamoud, B.; Amza, M.; Gorecki, G.P.; Sima, R.M.; Gică, N.; Pleș, L. Endometriosis in Menopausal Women-A New Age Is Coming? Literature Review. Life 2024, 14, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  57. Nnoaham, K.E.; Hummelshoj, L.; Webster, P.; d’Hooghe, T.; de Cicco Nardone, F.; de Cicco Nardone, C.; Jenkinson, C.; Kennedy, S.H.; Zondervan, K.T.; World Endometriosis Research Foundation Global Study of Women’s Health Consortium. Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: A multicenter study across ten countries. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 96, 366–373.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  58. Soliman, A.M.; Surrey, E.; Bonafede, M.; Nelson, J.K.; Castelli-Haley, J. Real-world evaluation of direct and indirect economic burden among endometriosis patients in the United States. Adv. Ther. 2018, 35, 408–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sima, R.M.; Pleş, L.; Socea, B.; Sklavounos, P.; Negoi, I.; Stănescu, A.D.; Iordache, I.I.; Hamoud, B.H.; Radosa, M.P.; Juhasz-Boess, I.; et al. Evaluation of the SF-36 questionnaire for assessment of the quality of life of endometriosis patients undergoing treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 22, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  60. Hansen, K.E.; Lambek, R.; Røssaak, K.; Egekvist, A.G.; Marschall, H.; Forman, A.; Kesmodel, U.S. Health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis: Psychometric validation of the Endometriosis Health Profile 30 questionnaire using confirmatory factor analysis. Hum. Reprod. Open 2021, 2022, hoab042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  61. Dancet, E.A.; Ameye, L.; Sermeus, W.; Welkenhuysen, M.; Nelen, W.L.; Tully, L.; De Bie, B.; Veit, J.; Vedsted-Hansen, H.; Zondervan, K.T.; et al. The ENDOCARE questionnaire (ECQ): A valid and reliable instrument to measure the patient-centeredness of endometriosis care in Europe. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 2988–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pontoppidan, K.; Olovsson, M.; Grundström, H. Clinical factors associated with quality of life among women with endometriosis: A cross-sectional study. BMC Women’s Health 2023, 23, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. D’Alterio, M.N.; Saponara, S.; Agus, M.; Laganà, A.S.; Noventa, M.; Loi, E.S.; Feki, A.; Angioni, S. Medical and surgical interventions to improve the quality of life for endometriosis patients: A systematic review. Gynecol. Surg. 2021, 18, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Warzecha, D.; Szymusik, I.; Wielgos, M.; Pietrzak, B. The Impact of Endometriosis on the Quality of Life and the Incidence of Depression-A Cohort Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  65. Gete, D.G.; Doust, J.; Mortlock, S.; Montgomery, G.; Mishra, G.D. Impact of endometriosis on women’s health-related quality of life: A national prospective cohort study. Maturitas 2023, 174, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bień, A.; Rzońca, E.; Zarajczyk, M.; Wilkosz, K.; Wdowiak, A.; Iwanowicz-Palus, G. Quality of life in women with endometriosis: A cross-sectional survey. Qual. Life Res. 2020, 29, 2669–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  67. Missmer, S.A.; Tu, F.; Soliman, A.M.; Chiuve, S.; Cross, S.; Eichner, S.; Antunez Flores, O.; Horne, A.; Schneider, B.; As-Sanie, S. Impact of endometriosis on women’s life decisions and goal attainment: A cross-sectional survey of members of an online patient community. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e052765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  68. Tiringer, D.; Pedrini, A.S.; Gstoettner, M.; Husslein, H.; Kuessel, L.; Perricos, A.; Wenzl, R. Evaluation of quality of life in endometriosis patients before and after surgical treatment using the EHP30 questionnaire. BMC Women’s Health 2022, 22, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  69. Zhu, C.; Yan, L.; He, C.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J. Incidence and risk factors of infertility among couples who desire a first and second child in Shanghai, China: A facility-based prospective cohort study. Reprod. Health 2022, 19, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Njagi, P.; Groot, W.; Arsenijevic, J.; Dyer, S.; Mburu, G.; Kiarie, J. Financial costs of assisted reproductive technology for patients in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Hum. Reprod. Open 2023, 2023, hoad007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, K.; Dou, S.; Qin, W.; Zhao, D.; Zheng, W.; Wang, D.; Zhang, C.; Guan, Y.; Tian, P. Association between quality of life and resilience in infertile patients: A systematic review. Front. Public Health 2024, 12, 1345899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Namdar, A.; Naghizadeh, M.M.; Zamani, M.; Yaghmaei, F.; Sameni, M.H. Quality of life and general health of infertile women. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2017, 15, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nik Hazlina, N.H.; Norhayati, M.N.; Shaiful Bahari, I.; Nik Muhammad Arif, N.A. Worldwide prevalence, risk factors and psychological impact of infertility among women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e057132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  74. Bahadur, A.; Kumari, S.; Mundhra, R.; Khoiwal, K.; Das, A.; Heda, A.; Pathak, A.; Heda, S. Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life Among Infertile Women: A Case-Control Study. Cureus 2024, 16, e55837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  75. Suleiman, M.; August, F.; Nanyaro, M.; Wangwe, P.; Kikula, A.; Balandya, B.; Ngarina, M.; Muganyizi, P. Quality of life and associated factors among infertile women attending infertility clinic at Mnazi Mmoja Hospital, Zanzibar. BMC Women’s Health 2023, 23, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. De Rose, M.; Melamed, R.; Braga, D.; Setti, A.; Iaconelli, A.; Junior, E.B. P-503 The role of the duration of infertility on the of quality of life and psychological health in infertile couples. Hum. Reprod. 2022, 37, deac107.466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dourou, P.; Gourounti, K.; Lykeridou, A.; Gaitanou, K.; Petrogiannis, N.; Sarantaki, A. Quality of Life among Couples with a Fertility Related Diagnosis. Clin. Pract. 2023, 13, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  78. Wdowiak, A.; Anusiewicz, A.; Bakalczuk, G.; Raczkiewicz, D.; Janczyk, P.; Makara-Studzińska, M. Assessment of Quality of Life in Infertility Treated Women in Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Massarotti, C.; Gentile, G.; Ferreccio, C.; Scaruffi, P.; Remorgida, V.; Anserini, P. Impact of infertility and infertility treatments on quality of life and levels of anxiety and depression in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2019, 35, 485–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cowell, A.C.; Gilmour, A.; Atkinson, D. Support Mechanisms for Women during Menopause: Perspectives from Social and Professional Structures. Women 2024, 4, 53–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Baral, S.; Kaphle, H.P. Health-related quality of life among menopausal women: A cross-sectional study from Pokhara, Nepal. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0280632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  82. Whiteley, J.; DiBonaventura Md Wagner, J.S.; Alvir, J.; Shah, S. The impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life, productivity, and economic outcomes. J. Women’s Health 2013, 22, 983–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  83. Hutchings, H.A.; Taylor, N.; Remesh, A.; Rafferty, J. A study evaluating quality of life and factors affecting it before, during and after menopause. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2023, 289, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Rathnayake, N.; Lenora, J.; Alwis, G.; Lekamwasam, S. Prevalence and Severity of Menopausal Symptoms and the Quality of Life in Middle-aged Women: A Study from Sri Lanka. Nurs. Res. Pract. 2019, 2019, 2081507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  85. Nazarpour, S.; Simbar, M.; Ramezani Tehrani, F.; Majd, H.A. Factors associated with quality of life of postmenopausal women living in Iran. BMC Women’s Health 2020, 20, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Theis, S.; Baumgartner, S.J.; Janka, H.; Kolokythas, A.; Skala, C.; Stute, P. Quality of life in menopausal women in the workplace—A systematic review. Climacteric 2023, 26, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Schultz, N.M.; Morga, A.; Siddiqui, E.; Rhoten, S.E. Psychometric Evaluation of the MENQOL Instrument in Women Experiencing Vasomotor Symptoms Associated with Menopause. Adv. Ther. 2024, 41, 2233–2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sydora, B.C.; Fast, H.; Campbell, S.; Yuksel, N.; Lewis, J.E.; Ross, S. Use of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire in research and clinical practice: A comprehensive scoping review. Menopause 2016, 23, 1038–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Barati, M.; Akbari-Heidari, H.; Samadi-Yaghin, E.; Jenabi, E.; Jormand, H.; Kamyari, N. The factors associated with the quality of life among postmenopausal women. BMC Women’s Health 2021, 21, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  90. Jenabi, E.; Shobeiri, F.; Hazavehei, S.M.; Roshanaei, G. Assessment of Questionnaire Measuring Quality of Life in Menopausal Women: A Systematic Review. Oman Med. J. 2015, 30, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  91. Wang, B.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wang, T.; Li, M.; Huang, Y.; Xue, L.; Zhu, Q.; Gao, X.; Wu, M. Global burden and trends of pelvic organ prolapse associated with aging women: An observational trend study from 1990 to 2019. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 975829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  92. Weintraub, A.Y.; Glinter, H.; Marcus-Braun, N. Narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnosis and pathophysiology of pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2020, 46, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  93. Barber, M.D.; Maher, C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2013, 24, 1783–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Addisu, D.; Mekie, M.; Belachew, Y.Y.; Degu, A.; Gebeyehu, N.A. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse and associated factors in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1193069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Jokhio, A.H.; Rizvi, R.M.; MacArthur, C. Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in women, associated factors and impact on quality of life in rural Pakistan: Population-based study. BMC Women’s Health 2020, 20, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  96. Sánchez-Sánchez, B.; Yuste-Sánchez, M.J.; Arranz-Martín, B.; Navarro-Brazález, B.; Romay-Barrero, H.; Torres-Lacomba, M. Quality of Life in POP: Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness of the Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (P-QoL) in Spanish Women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  97. Digesu, G.A.; Khullar, V.; Cardozo, L.; Robinson, D.; Salvatore, S. P-QOL: A validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor. Dysfunct. 2005, 16, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Belayneh, T.; Gebeyehu, A.; Adefris, M.; Rortveit, G.; Genet, T. Translation, transcultural adaptation, reliability and validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quality of life (P-QoL) in Amharic. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2019, 17, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  99. Shakhaliev, R.; Kubin, N.; Nikitina, T.; Ionova, T.; Digesu, A.; Shkarupa, D. Validation of the Russian Version of the Prolapse Quality-of-life Questionnaire and its Application to Assess the Impact of Pelvic Organ Prolapse on Quality of Life and the Effect of Treatment in Women Undergoing Reconstructive Surgery. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2024, 35, 863–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Verbeek, M.; Hayward, L. Pelvic Floor Dysfunction and Its Effect on Quality of Sexual Life. Sex. Med. Rev. 2019, 7, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Ghanbari, Z.; Ghaemi, M.; Shafiee, A.; Jelodarian, P.; Hosseini, R.S.; Pouyamoghaddam, S.; Montazeri, A. Quality of Life Following Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatments in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Oláh, O.; Romics, M.; Ács, N.; Cseh, R.; Nyirády, P.; Majoros, A. Demographic, socioeconomic and functional health-related factors in the selection of vaginal pessaries used for the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A retrospective study. BMC Women’s Health 2025, 25, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  103. Zeiger, B.B.; da Silva Carramão, S.; Del Roy, C.A.; da Silva, T.T.; Hwang, S.M.; Auge, A.P.F. Vaginal pessary in advanced pelvic organ prolapse: Impact on quality of life. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2022, 33, 2013–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  104. Kuhn, A.; Bapst, D.; Stadlmayr, W.; Vits, K.; Mueller, M.D. Sexual and organ function in patients with symptomatic prolapse: Are pessaries helpful? Fertil. Steril. 2009, 91, 1914–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Harvey, M.A.; Lemieux, M.C.; Robert, M.; Schulz, J.A. Guideline No. 411: Vaginal Pessary Use. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2021, 43, 255–266.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Rantell, A. Vaginal Pessaries for Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Their Impact on Sexual Function. Sex. Med. Rev. 2019, 7, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wharton, L.; Athey, R.; Jha, S. Do vaginal pessaries used to treat pelvic organ prolapse impact on sexual function? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2022, 33, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Carlin, G.L.; Morgenbesser, R.; Kimberger, O.; Umek, W.; Bodner, K.; Bodner-Adler, B. Does the choice of pelvic organ prolapse treatment influence subjective pelvic-floor related quality of life? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2021, 259, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Wallace, S.L.; Miller, L.D.; Mishra, K. Pelvic floor physical therapy in the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction in women. Curr. Opin. Obs. Gynecol. 2019, 31, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Eftekhar, T.; Sohrabi, M.; Haghollahi, F.; Shariat, M.; Miri, E. Comparison effect of physiotherapy with surgery on sexual function in patients with pelvic floor disorder: A randomized clinical trial. Iran J. Reprod. Med. 2014, 12, 7–14. [Google Scholar]
  111. Braekken, I.H.; Majida, M.; Ellström Engh, M.; Bø, K. Can pelvic floor muscle training improve sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse? A randomized controlled trial. J. Sex. Med. 2015, 12, 470–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Zhong, F.; Miao, W.; Yu, Z.; Hong, L.; Deng, N. Clinical effect of electrical stimulation biofeedback therapy combined with pelvic floor functional exercise on postpartum pelvic organ prolapse. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 6629–6637. [Google Scholar]
  113. Constantine, M.L.; Pauls, R.N.; Rogers, R.R.; Rockwood, T.H. Validation of a single summary score for the Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-IUGA revised (PISQ-IR). Int. Urogynecol. J. 2017, 28, 1901–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Rockwood, T.H.; Constantine, M.L.; Adegoke, O.; Rogers, R.G.; McDermott, E.; Davila, G.W.; Domoney, C.; Jha, S.; Kammerer-Doak, D.; Lukacz, E.S.; et al. The PISQ-IR: Considerations in scale scoring and development. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2013, 24, 1105–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Rusavy, Z.; Kovarova, V.; Tvarozek, S.; Smazinka, M.; Havir, M.; Kalis, V. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Sexual Life in Women After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy using PISQ-IR. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2024, 35, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Pizzol, D.; Demurtas, J.; Celotto, S.; Maggi, S.; Smith, L.; Angiolelli, G.; Trott, M.; Yang, L.; Veronese, N. Urinary incontinence and quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2021, 33, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  117. Corrado, B.; Giardulli, B.; Polito, F.; Aprea, S.; Lanzano, M.; Dodaro, C. The Impact of Urinary Incontinence on Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Metropolitan City of Naples. Geriatrics 2020, 5, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  118. Norton, P.; Brubaker, L. Urinary incontinence in women. Lancet 2006, 367, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Åström, Y.; Asklund, I.; Lindam, A.; Sjöström, M. Quality of life in women with urinary incontinence seeking care using e-health. BMC Women’s Health 2021, 21, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  120. AlQuaiz, A.M.; Kazi, A.; AlYousefi, N.; Alwatban, L.; AlHabib, Y.; Turkistani, I. Urinary Incontinence Affects the Quality of Life and Increases Psychological Distress and Low Self-Esteem. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Chow, P.M.; Chuang, Y.C.; Hsu, K.C.P.; Shen, Y.C.; Liu, S.P. Impact of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence on Quality of Life, Mental Health, Work Limitation, and Healthcare Seeking in China, Taiwan, and South Korea (LUTS Asia): Results from a Cross-Sectional, Population-Based Study. Int. J. Women’s Health 2022, 14, 1871–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  122. Baczewska, B.; Wiśniewska, K.; Muraczyńska, B.; Pasek, M.; Słuszniak, J.; Gębicka, K.; Guzak, B. Assessment by Women on Selected Aspects of Quality of Life and on Disease Acceptance after Undergoing Urogynecological Procedures for Urinary Incontinence. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 4894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Sánchez-Ferrer, M.L.; Adoamnei, E.; Prieto-Sánchez, M.T.; Mendiola, J.; Corbalán-Biyang, S.; Moñino-García, M.; Palomar-Rodríguez, J.A.; Torres-Cantero, A.M. Health-related quality of life in women with polycystic ovary syndrome attending to a tertiary hospital in Southeastern Spain: A case-control study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2020, 18, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  124. Coffin, T.; Wray, J.; Sah, R.; Maj, M.; Nath, R.; Nauhria, S.; Maity, S.; Nauhria, S. A Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence and Health Impact of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Among Medical and Dental Students. Cureus 2023, 15, e40141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  125. Behboodi Moghadam, Z.; Fereidooni, B.; Saffari, M.; Montazeri, A. Measures of health-related quality of life in PCOS women: A systematic review. Int. J. Women’s Health 2018, 10, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  126. Tabassum, F.; Jyoti, C.; Sinha, H.H.; Dhar, K.; Akhtar, M.S. Impact of polycystic ovary syndrome on quality of life of women in correlation to age, basal metabolic index, education and marriage. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  127. Ligocka, N.; Chmaj-Wierzchowska, K.; Wszołek, K.; Wilczak, M.; Tomczyk, K. Quality of Life of Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Medicina 2024, 60, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Williams, S.; Sheffield, D.; Knibb, R.C. The Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Quality of Life scale (PCOSQOL): Development and preliminary validation. Health Psychol. Open 2018, 5, 2055102918788195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  129. Wright, P.J.; Tavakoli, A.S.; Dawson, R.M. Exploratory factor and confirmatory analyses of the polycystic ovary syndrome health-related quality of life questionnaire (PCOSQ-50). Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2024, 22, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  130. Peerwani, G.; Rozi, S.; Lakhdir, M.P.A.; Zuberi, N.; Asad, N. Association of depressive symptoms and quality of life in Pakistani youth (15-24 years) with polycystic ovarian syndrome: A web-based analytical cross-sectional study. Front. Glob. Women’s Health 2023, 4, 967883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  131. Bazarganipour, F.; Taghavi, S.A.; Montazeri, A.; Ahmadi, F.; Chaman, R.; Khosravi, A. The impact of polycystic ovary syndrome on the health-related quality of life: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J. Reprod. Med. 2015, 13, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  132. Tandoğan, Ö.; Ak, E.Y.; Akdemir, A.; Oskay, Ü.; Callioglu, N. Effect of polycystic ovary syndrome on the life quality of young women. Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) 2024, 70, e20231368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  133. Rzońca, E.; Bień, A.; Wdowiak, A.; Szymański, R.; Iwanowicz-Palus, G. Determinants of Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Life in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. De Lima Nunes, R.; Dos Santos, I.K.; Cobucci, R.N.; Pichini, G.S.; Soares, G.M.; de Oliveira Maranhão, T.M.; Dantas, P.M.S. Lifestyle interventions and quality of life for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Medicine 2019, 98, e18323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  135. Kotusiewicz, W.; Siekierko, N.; Żołnierek, M.; Lubczyńska, Z.; Popravko, Y.; Świętochowski, J.; Lewandowski, M.; Bienia, G. Impact of various dietary interventions on the reduction of symptoms in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). J. Educ. Health Sport. 2023, 13, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Cowan, S.; Lim, S.; Alycia, C.; Pirotta, S.; Thomson, R.; Gibson-Helm, M.; Blackmore, R.; Naderpoor, N.; Bennett, C.; Ee, C.; et al. Lifestyle management in polycystic ovary syndrome—Beyond diet and physical activity. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2023, 23, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  137. Giuliani, E.; As-Sanie, S.; Marsh, E.E. Epidemiology and management of uterine fibroids. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2020, 149, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Stewart, E.A.; Cookson, C.L.; Gandolfo, R.A.; Schulze-Rath, R. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: A systematic review. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2017, 124, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Neumann, B.; Singh, B.; Brennan, J.; Blanck, J.; Segars, J.H. The impact of fibroid treatments on quality of life and mental health: A systematic review. Fertil. Steril. 2024, 121, 400–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  140. Hervé, F.; Katty, A.; Isabelle, Q.; Céline, S. Impact of uterine fibroids on quality of life: A national cross-sectional survey. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 229, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Koga, K.; Fukui, M.; Fujisawa, M.; Suzukamo, Y. Impact of diagnosis and treatment of uterine fibroids on quality of life and labor productivity: The Japanese online survey for uterine fibroids and quality of life (JOYFUL survey). J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2023, 49, 2528–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Keizer, A.L.; van Kesteren, P.J.M.; Terwee, C.; de Lange, M.E.; Hehenkamp, W.J.K.; Kok, H.S. Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality of Life questionnaire (UFS-QOL NL) in the Dutch population: A validation study. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e052664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  143. Fortin, C.; Flyckt, R.; Falcone, T. Alternatives to hysterectomy: The burden of fibroids and the quality of life. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obs. Gynaecol. 2018, 46, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Ghant, M.S.; Sengoba, K.S.; Recht, H.; Cameron, K.A.; Lawson, A.K.; Marsh, E.E. Beyond the physical: A qualitative assessment of the burden of symptomatic uterine fibroids on women’s emotional and psychosocial health. J. Psychosom. Res. 2015, 78, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Borah, B.J.; Nicholson, W.K.; Bradley, L.; Stewart, E.A. The impact of uterine leiomyomas: A national survey of affected women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 209, 319.e1–319.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  146. Stewart, E.A.; Nicholson, W.K.; Bradley, L.; Borah, B.J. The burden of uterine fibroids for African-American women: Results of a national survey. J. Women’s Health 2013, 22, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  147. Liu, Z.; Doan, Q.V.; Blumenthal, P.; Dubois, R.W. A systematic review evaluating health-related quality of life, work impairment, and health-care costs and utilization in abnormal uterine bleeding. Value Health 2007, 10, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Gokyildiz, S.; Aslan, E.; Beji, N.K.; Mecdi, M. The Effects of Menorrhagia on Women’s Quality of Life: A Case-Control Study. ISRN Obstet. Gynecol. 2013, 2013, 918179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  149. Lancastle, D.; Kopp Kallner, H.; Hale, G.; Wood, B.; Ashcroft, L.; Driscoll, H. Development of a brief menstrual quality of life measure for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. BMC Women’s Health 2023, 23, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  150. Karlsson, T.S.; Marions, L.B.; Edlund, M.G. Heavy menstrual bleeding significantly affects quality of life. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2014, 93, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Sinharoy, S.S.; Chery, L.; Patrick, M.; Conrad, A.; Ramaswamy, A.; Stephen, A.; Chipungu, J.; Reddy, Y.M.; Doma, R.; Pasricha, S.R.; et al. Prevalence of heavy menstrual bleeding and associations with physical health and wellbeing in low-income and middle-income countries: A multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet Global Health 2023, 11, e1775–e1784, Erratum in Lancet Glob. Health 2023, 11, e1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  152. Vannuccini, S.; Meleca, C.; Toscano, F.; Mertino, P.; Pampaloni, F.; Fambrini, M.; Bruni, V.; Petraglia, F. Adenomyosis diagnosis among adolescents and young women with dysmenorrhoea and heavy menstrual bleeding. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2024, 48, 103768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Martire, F.G.; d’Abate, C.; Schettini, G.; Cimino, G.; Ginetti, A.; Colombi, I.; Cannoni, A.; Centini, G.; Zupi, E.; Lazzeri, L. Adenomyosis and Adolescence: A Challenging Diagnosis and Complex Management. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Yu, O.; Schulze-Rath, R.; Grafton, J.; Hansen, K.; Scholes, D.; Reed, S.D. Adenomyosis incidence, prevalence and treatment: United States population-based study 2006–2015. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 223, 94.e1–94.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Li, N.; Yuan, M.; Li, Q.; Ji, M.; Jiao, X.; Wang, G. Higher Risk of Anxiety and Depression in Women with Adenomyosis as Compared with Those with Uterine Leiomyoma. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Alcalde, A.M.; Martínez-Zamora, M.Á.; Gracia, M.; Ros, C.; Rius, M.; Nicolás, I.; Carmona, F. Impact of Adenomyosis on Women’s Psychological Health and Work Productivity: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. J. Women’s Health 2021, 30, 1653–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Felix, T.C.; de Araújo, L.B.; Röder, D.V.D.B.; Pedroso, R.D.S. Evaluation of Vulvovaginitis and Hygiene Habits of Women Attended in Primary Health Care Units of the Family. Int. J. Women’s Health 2020, 12, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Chow, K.; Wooten, D.; Annepally, S.; Burke, L.; Edi, R.; Morris, S.R. Impact of (recurrent) bacterial vaginosis on quality of life and the need for accessible alternative treatments. BMC Women’s Health 2023, 23, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  159. Fukazawa, E.I.; Witkin, S.S.; Robial, R.; Vinagre, J.G.; Baracat, E.C.; Linhares, I.M. Influence of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis on quality of life issues. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2019, 300, 647–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Lietz, A.; Eckel, F.; Kiss, H.; Noe-Letschnig, M.; Farr, A. Quality of life in women with chronic recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis: A sub-analysis of the prospective multicentre phase IIb/III Prof-001 study. Mycoses 2023, 66, 767–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Krishnaswamy, P.H.; Middleton, E.; Hagen, S.; Guerrero, K.L.; Booth, J. Women’s Experiences of Urinary Tract Infections and Impact on Life: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. Urogynecology 2024, 30, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Renard, J.; Ballarini, S.; Mascarenhas, T.; Zahran, M.; Quimper, E.; Choucair, J.; Iselin, C.E. Recurrent Lower Urinary Tract Infections Have a Detrimental Effect on Patient Quality of Life: A Prospective, Observational Study. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2015, 4, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Grigoryan, L.; Mulgirigama, A.; Powell, M.; Schmiemann, G. The emotional impact of urinary tract infections in women: A qualitative analysis. BMC Women’s Health 2022, 22, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  164. Hutton, D.; Mustafa, A.; Patil, S.; Rathod, S.; Shrikhande, G.; Advincula, A.; Drummond, J.; Gregersen, P.; Hall, J.; Metz, C.; et al. The burden of Chronic Pelvic Pain (CPP): Costs and quality of life of women and men with CPP treated in outpatient referral centers. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0269828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Graeve, C.; Gao, G.; Stephenson, V.; Helland, R.; Jeffery, A.D. Impact of chronic pelvic pain on quality of life in diverse young adults. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2024, 310, 3147–3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Questionnaire translation or validation.
Table 1. Questionnaire translation or validation.
QuestionnaireAbbreviationTranslation or Validation
World Health Organization Quality of Life scaleWHOQOL-BREFValidated in over 40 languages (e.g., United State of America, Japan, Netherlands, Australia, Poland, India, Bangladesh, Thailand, Croatia) [3,12]
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health SurveySF-36Evaluated in more than 50 languages [13]
Duke Health ProfileDUKETranslated into more than 17 languages [14] and validated in France [15] and Vietnam [16]
Endometriosis Health ProfileEHP-30A total of 56 certified language versions [17]; validated in Portuguese [18], Turkish [19], and Swedish [20]
Fertility quality of life questionnaireFertiQoLTranslated into more than 20 languages [21,22,23]
Menopause-specific Quality of Life QuestionnaireMENQOLValidated in Greek [24], Chinese [25], and Persian [26] languages
Prolapse Quality of Life QuestionnaireP-QoLValidated in English, Japanese, Italian, German, Turkish, traditional Chinese, and Persian languages [27]
Table 2. Dysmenorrhea and patients’ quality of life.
Table 2. Dysmenorrhea and patients’ quality of life.
Authors (Year)Number of ParticipantsPrevalence of DysmenorrheaMean Age of Participants (Years)The Effects of Dysmenorrhea on the Quality of Life
Hailemeskel et al. [45] (2016)44085.4%20.57 ± 1.3680.0%—school absence
21.0%—inability to do homework
66.8%—loss of concentration in class
47.4%—reduced participation in class
37.8%—limited sport participation
31.7%—limitations in going out with friends
Esan et al. [40] (2024)39769.8%19.73 ± 1.150.2%—affected routine work
38.8%—disturbed sleep
44.8%—social withdrawal
53.8%—restricted physical activities
45.8%—have been late to class
Fathi et al. [46] (2022)29883.6% 20.32 ± 3.1925.5%—affected daily activities
10.4%—affected personal care
8.4%—problems with mobility
Unsal et al. [47] (2010)62372.7%20.8 ± 1.8Significantly lower scores in Short Form-36 (SF-36) domains in students with dysmenorrhea:
-
Physical functioning;
-
General health perception;
-
Bodily pain;
-
Role—physical;
-
Vitality.
Mohamed et al. [48] (2013)109278.8%16.8 ± 0.8745.2%—having problems with family
63.4%—living apart from their family
67.9%—unwilling to talk with friends
71.1%—not comfortable in relationships with friends
Hashim et al. [49] (2020)37680.1%20.97 ± 1.49SF-36 domains statistically significantly affected by dysmenorrhea:
-
Physical health;
-
Health changes;
-
Emotional health;
-
Pain.
Chia et al. [50] (2013)24080.0%20.1 ± 1.426%—sleep disturbance
3%—hospital admission
36%—negative impact on psychosocial well-being
75%—study disturbances and/or reduced ability to concentrate
Table 3. Endometriosis and patients’ quality of life.
Table 3. Endometriosis and patients’ quality of life.
Authors (Year)Number of Participants with EndometriosisQuestionnaireThe Effects of Endometriosis on Quality of Life
Warzecha et al. [64] (2020)246EPHect Patient Questionnaire (EPQ) 70.2%—reduced physical activity
69.5%—reduced sexual activity
39.5%—reduced professional activity
15.1%—diagnosed with depression
Gete et al. [65] (2023)615SF-36Worse scores on the SF-36 than patients without endometriosis:
-
Physical functioning;
-
Role physical;
-
Bodily pain;
-
General health;
-
Vitality;
-
Social functioning;
-
Role emotional;
-
Mental health;
-
Physical Health Component Scale;
-
Mental health components.
Bień et al. [66] (2020)309-WHOQOL-BREF
-Acceptance of Illness Scale (AIS)
-
Overall QoL score: 3.30
-
Overall perceived health score: 2.37
-
The highest QoL scores: psychological domain
-
The lowest QoL scores: physical domain
-
Moderate level of illness acceptance (24.64)
Missmer et al. [67] (2022)743Original surveyPatients ‘somewhat agreed’ or ‘strongly agreed’ with the following:
-
Problems in their intimate relationships (83%);
-
A barrier to starting a family (58%);
-
Traveling less (59%);
-
Less outgoing (81%);
-
Limited the ability to maintain a healthy diet (55%);
-
Endometriosis-associated symptoms led to the use drugs, cigarettes, or alcohol (43%);
-
Less positive about the future (80%);
-
Feeling of not having reached their full potential (75%).
Tiringer et al. [68] (2022)115EHP-30Preoperative and 6–10 weeks postoperative values were compared:
-
Significant improvements in the following domains: “pain”, “self-determination”, “emotional health”, “social environment”, and “self-image” (p < 0.001), especially women with deep-infiltrating endometriosis with or without ovarian endometrioma.
Table 4. The gynecological pathologies and patients’ quality of life.
Table 4. The gynecological pathologies and patients’ quality of life.
Gynecological PathologySchoolWorkSexualityPsychology
DysmenorrheaFrequent absences during menstrual cycles
Negative impact on school performance
Loss of concentration in class
Inability to complete homework		Frequent absences during menstrual cyclesReduced sexual desire due to painSleep disturbance
Negative impact on psychosocial well-being
Anxiety
Depression
EndometriosisRare, but possible in severe caseReduced professional activity
Reduced working hours and productivity 		Reduced sexual activityDepression
Anxiety
Affected mental health
Sleep disturbance
InfertilityNot applicableRareDifficulties in marital life
Dysfunction in sexual relationships		Psychological distress
Anxiety
Depression
MenopauseNot applicableVariable Vaginal dryness
Decreased libido		Anxiety
Depression
Sleep problems
Pelvic organ prolapseNot applicableLimitations of professional activityLimitations in sexual activity
Discomfort during sexual intercourse		Low self-esteem
Urinary disordersNot applicableVariable depending on the intensity of symptomsNegative impact on sexual function
Decreased sexual desire		Low self-esteem
Desire for isolation
Depression
Polycystic ovarian syndromeIndirect (due to depression or fatigue)RareNegative impact on sexual function
Feelings like “different”, “unfeminine”		Negative psychological effects
High stress
Feeling of lack of control over the disease
Anxiety
Depression
Fatigue
Sleep problems
Uterine fibromatosisRareDecreasing productivity (due to pain or heavy bleeding)Negative impact on sexual function
Dyspareunia		Altered self-image and physical wellness
Fear
Anxiety
Depression
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amza, M.; Hamoud, B.H.; Sima, R.-M.; Gorecki, G.-P.; Poenaru, M.-O.; Diaconescu, A.-S.; Gică, N.; Constantin, A.-A.; Popescu, M.; Pleș, L. The Impact of Gynecological Pathologies on Patients’ Quality of Life from Menarche to Menopause—Literature Review. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 6281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176281

AMA Style

Amza M, Hamoud BH, Sima R-M, Gorecki G-P, Poenaru M-O, Diaconescu A-S, Gică N, Constantin A-A, Popescu M, Pleș L. The Impact of Gynecological Pathologies on Patients’ Quality of Life from Menarche to Menopause—Literature Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(17):6281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176281

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amza, Mihaela, Bashar Haj Hamoud, Romina-Marina Sima, Gabriel-Petre Gorecki, Mircea-Octavian Poenaru, Andrei-Sebastian Diaconescu, Nicolae Gică, Ancuta-Alina Constantin, Mihai Popescu, and Liana Pleș. 2025. "The Impact of Gynecological Pathologies on Patients’ Quality of Life from Menarche to Menopause—Literature Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 17: 6281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176281

APA Style

Amza, M., Hamoud, B. H., Sima, R.-M., Gorecki, G.-P., Poenaru, M.-O., Diaconescu, A.-S., Gică, N., Constantin, A.-A., Popescu, M., & Pleș, L. (2025). The Impact of Gynecological Pathologies on Patients’ Quality of Life from Menarche to Menopause—Literature Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(17), 6281. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176281

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop