Next Article in Journal
The Co-Occurrence of Temporomandibular Disorders in Patients Diagnosed with Tinnitus: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Long-COVID Syndrome in a Cohort of Patients with Endometriosis or Adenomyosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Study Protocol

Epidural Stimulation and Resistance Training (REST-SCI) for Overground Locomotion After Spinal Cord Injury: Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol

1
Spinal Cord Injury and Disorders, Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23249, USA
2
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
3
Department of Anesthesiology, Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23249, USA
4
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA
5
Department of Urology, Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23249, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 1829; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061829
Submission received: 31 December 2024 / Revised: 30 January 2025 / Accepted: 25 February 2025 / Published: 8 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)

Abstract

Introduction: Implanted spinal cord epidural stimulation (SCES) is an emerging neuromodulation approach that increases the excitability of the central pattern generator [CPG] and enhances tonic and rhythmic motor patterns after spinal cord injury (SCI). We determine the effects of exoskeleton-assisted walking [EAW] + epidural stimulation [ES] + resistance training [RT] on volitional motor control as a primary outcome, as well as autonomic cardiovascular profile, body composition, and bladder function compared to EAW + delayed ES + noRT in persons with motor-complete SCI AIS A and B. Methods and Analysis: Twenty male and female participants [age 18–60 years] with traumatic motor-complete SCI [2 years or more post injury], and level of injury below C5 were randomized into either EAW + ES + RT or EAW + delayed-ES + no-RT groups for more than 12 months. Baseline, post-interventions 1 and 2 were conducted six months apart. Measurements included body composition assessment using anthropometry, dual x-ray absorptiometry, and magnetic resonance imaging prior to implantation to evaluate the extent of spinal cord damage, neurophysiologic assessments to record H-reflexes, overground ambulation and peak torque for both groups, and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury Scale [WISCI 2]. Metabolic profile measurements included the resting metabolic rate, fasting biomarkers of HbA1c, lipid panels, total testosterone CRP, IL-6, TNF-α, plasma IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and then a glucose tolerance test. Finally, urodynamic testing was conducted to assess functional bladder improvement due to ES. Results: The restoration of locomotion with ES and EAW may result in a reduction in psychosocial, cardiovascular, and metabolic bladder parameters and socioeconomic burden. The addition of the resistance training paradigm may further augment the outcomes of ES on motor function in persons with SCI. Conclusions: Percutaneous SCES appears to be a feasible and safe rehabilitation approach for the restoration of motor function in persons with SCI. The procedure may be successfully implemented with other task-specific training similar to EAW and resistance training.
Keywords: epidural stimulation; spinal cord injury; exoskeleton; standing; locomotion; neuromuscular electrical stimulation; body composition; overground ambulation epidural stimulation; spinal cord injury; exoskeleton; standing; locomotion; neuromuscular electrical stimulation; body composition; overground ambulation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gorgey, A.S.; Trainer, R.; Khalil, R.E.; Deitrich, J.; Rehman, M.U.; Goetz, L.L.; Lester, D.; Klausner, A.; Peterson, C.L.; Lavis, T. Epidural Stimulation and Resistance Training (REST-SCI) for Overground Locomotion After Spinal Cord Injury: Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061829

AMA Style

Gorgey AS, Trainer R, Khalil RE, Deitrich J, Rehman MU, Goetz LL, Lester D, Klausner A, Peterson CL, Lavis T. Epidural Stimulation and Resistance Training (REST-SCI) for Overground Locomotion After Spinal Cord Injury: Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(6):1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061829

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gorgey, Ashraf S., Robert Trainer, Refka E. Khalil, Jakob Deitrich, Muhammad Uzair Rehman, Lance L. Goetz, Denise Lester, Adam Klausner, Carrie L. Peterson, and Timothy Lavis. 2025. "Epidural Stimulation and Resistance Training (REST-SCI) for Overground Locomotion After Spinal Cord Injury: Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 6: 1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061829

APA Style

Gorgey, A. S., Trainer, R., Khalil, R. E., Deitrich, J., Rehman, M. U., Goetz, L. L., Lester, D., Klausner, A., Peterson, C. L., & Lavis, T. (2025). Epidural Stimulation and Resistance Training (REST-SCI) for Overground Locomotion After Spinal Cord Injury: Randomized Clinical Trial Protocol. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(6), 1829. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14061829

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop