Sarcopenia Abdominal Muscle Mass Index Assessment Informs Surgical Decision-Making in Displaced Fractures of the Femoral Neck
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Demographics
3.2. Postoperative Outcomes
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Florschutz, A.V.; Langford, J.R.; Haidukewych, G.J.; Koval, K.J. Femoral Neck Fractures: Current Management. J. Orthop. Trauma 2015, 29, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baghdadi, S.; Kiyani, M.; Kalantar, S.H.; Shiri, S.; Sohrabi, O.; Beheshti Fard, S.; Afzal, S.; Khabiri, S.S. Mortality Following Proximal Femoral Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Large Retrospective Cohort Study of Incidence and Risk Factors. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2023, 24, 693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walter, N.; Szymski, D.; Kurtz, S.; Alt, V.; Lowenberg, D.W.; Lau, E.; Rupp, M. Factors Associated with Mortality after Proximal Femoral Fracture. J. Orthop. Traumatol. 2023, 24, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Recommendations|Hip Fracture: Management|Guidance|NICE. Available online: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124/chapter/recommendations#surgical-procedures (accessed on 29 December 2024).
- Liodakis, E.; Antoniou, J.; Zukor, D.J.; Huk, O.L.; Epure, L.M.; Bergeron, S.G. Major Complications and Transfusion Rates After Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures. J. Arthroplasty 2016, 31, 2008–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Healy, W.L.; Iorio, R.; Clair, A.J.; Pellegrini, V.D.; Della Valle, C.J.; Berend, K.R. Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Standardized List, Definitions, and Stratification Developed by The Hip Society. Clin. Orthop. 2016, 474, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, T.; Morimoto, T.; Sonohata, M.; Mawatari, M. Is Dislocation Following Total Hip Arthroplasty Caused While Suffering from Delirium? Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 2021, 83, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roblot, G.; Demester, J.; Brunschweiler, B.; Gabrion, A.; Rahab, R.; Mertl, P. Periprosthetic fractures around cemented hip hemiarthroplasty: Are SOFCOT-Vancouver recommendations mandatory? A comparative study with propensity score matching. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2025, 111, 104189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macheras, G.A.; Pallis, D.; Tsivelekas, K.; Ampadiotaki, M.M.; Lepetsos, P.; Tzefronis, D.; Kateros, K.; Papadakis, S.A. Acetabular Erosion after Bipolar Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study. Hip Int. J. Clin. Exp. Res. Hip Pathol. Ther. 2024, 34, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brzeszczynski, F.; Brzeszczynska, J.; Duckworth, A.D.; Murray, I.R.; Simpson, A.H.R.W.; Hamilton, D.F. The Effect of Sarcopenia on Outcomes Following Orthopaedic Surgery: A Systematic Review. Bone Jt. J. 2022, 104-B, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cruz-Jentoft, A.J.; Bahat, G.; Bauer, J.; Boirie, Y.; Bruyère, O.; Cederholm, T.; Cooper, C.; Landi, F.; Rolland, Y.; Sayer, A.A.; et al. Sarcopenia: Revised European Consensus on Definition and Diagnosis. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 16–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brzeszczyński, F.; Hamilton, D.; Bończak, O.; Brzeszczyńska, J. Systematic Review of Sarcopenia Biomarkers in Hip Fracture Patients as a Potential Tool in Clinical Evaluation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 13433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ackermans, L.L.G.C.; Rabou, J.; Basrai, M.; Schweinlin, A.; Bischoff, S.C.; Cussenot, O.; Cancel-Tassin, G.; Renken, R.J.; Gómez, E.; Sánchez-González, P.; et al. Screening, Diagnosis and Monitoring of Sarcopenia: When to Use Which Tool? Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2022, 48, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, W.J.; Guralnik, J.; Cawthon, P.; Appleby, J.; Landi, F.; Clarke, L.; Vellas, B.; Ferrucci, L.; Roubenoff, R. Sarcopenia: No Consensus, No Diagnostic Criteria, and No Approved Indication—How Did We Get Here? GeroScience 2024, 46, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.-L.; Shen, J.; Danzeng, C.-D.; Xu, X.-S.; Cao, Z.-X.; Jiang, W. CT Psoas Calculations on the Prognosis Prediction of Emergency Laparotomy: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study in Eastern Asian Population. World J. Emerg. Surg. WJES 2022, 17, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brzeszczyński, F.F.; Brzeszczyńska, J.I. Markers of Sarcopenia Increase 30-Day Mortality Following Emergency Laparotomy: A Systematic Review. Scand. J. Surg. 2023, 112, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simpson, G.; Wilson, J.; Vimalachandran, D.; McNicol, F.; Magee, C. Sarcopenia Estimation Using Psoas Major Enhances P-POSSUM Mortality Prediction in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: Cross-Sectional Study. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg. 2022, 48, 2003–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simpson, G.; Manu, N.; Magee, C.; Wilson, J.; Moug, S.; Vimalachandran, D. Measuring Sarcopenia on Pre-Operative CT in Older Adults Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: A Comparison of Three Different Calculations. Int. J. Color. Dis. 2020, 35, 1095–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dindo, D.; Demartines, N.; Clavien, P.-A. Classification of Surgical Complications. Ann. Surg. 2004, 240, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stokes, J.W.; Wanderer, J.P.; McEvoy, M.D. Significant Discrepancies Exist between Clinician Assessment and Patient Self-Assessment of Functional Capacity by Validated Scoring Tools during Preoperative Evaluation. Perioper. Med. 2016, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukkriang, N.; Punsawad, C. Comparison of Geriatric Assessment Tools for Frailty among Community Elderly. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hatano, M.; Sasabuchi, Y.; Isogai, T.; Ishikura, H.; Tanaka, T.; Tanaka, S.; Yasunaga, H. Increased Early Complications after Total Hip Arthroplasty Compared with Hemiarthroplasty in Older Adults with a Femoral Neck Fracture. Bone Jt. J. 2024, 106-B, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Voskuijl, T.; Neuhaus, V.; Kinaci, A.; Vrahas, M.; Ring, D. In-Hospital Outcomes after Hemiarthroplasty versus Total Hip Arthroplasty for Isolated Femoral Neck Fractures. Arch. Bone Jt. Surg. 2014, 2, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Phillips, J.R.A.; Moran, C.G.; Manktelow, A.R.J. Periprosthetic Fractures around Hip Hemiarthroplasty Performed for Hip Fracture. Injury 2013, 44, 757–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mahmoud, A.N.; Suk, M.; Horwitz, D.S. Symptomatic Acetabular Erosion After Hip Hemiarthroplasty: Is It a Major Concern? A Retrospective Analysis of 2477 Hemiarthroplasty Cases. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 6756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) (n = 43) | Hemiarthroplasty (HA) (n = 40) | p-Value (Z-Score) a | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender [Female—F; Male—M] | F = 25 (58%) M = 18 (42%) | F = 32 (80%) M = 8 (20%) | p = 0.032 a (−2.15) |
Age (median with IQR) [years] | 69 (64–74) | 84 (75–90) | p < 0.0001 b |
Body mass index (BMI) (median with IQR) [kg/m2] | 25.72 (23.44–29.37) | 25.13 (20.18–27.11) | p = 0.126 b (n.s.) |
Length of hospital stay (LOS) (median with IQR) [days] | 10 (7–12) | 12.5 (9–16) | p = 0.036 b |
Smoking habit | 11 (25.5%) | 5 (12.5%) | p = 0.131 b (n.s.) |
Comorbidities: | |||
Hypertension | 22 (51%) | 29 (72.5%) | p = 0.046 a (−1.99) |
Cardiovascular disease | 9 (21%) | 19 (47.5%) | p = 0.011 a (−2.56) |
Diabetes | 11 (21%) | 9 (22.5%) | p = 0.743 a (0.33) |
Pulmonary disease | 0 | 2 (5%) | - |
Dementia | 0 | 3 (7.5%) | - |
Active cancer | 2 (5%) | 7 (17.5%) | p = 0.060 a (−1.88) |
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) (n = 43) | Hemiarthroplasty (HA) (n = 40) | p-Value OR (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|
PML3 score (median with IQR) [mm2] | 1.34 (1.00–1.78) | 0.70 (0.47–1.47) | p = 0.002 a |
PML3 score in patients with complications (median with IQR) [mm2] | 0.56 (0.41–1.05) | 0.57 (0.43–1.83) | p = 0.847 a (n.s.) |
Postoperative complications in overall | 9 (21%) | 19 (48%) | p = 0.019 b 3.42 (1.24–8.62) |
30-day survival | 42 (98%) | 36 (90%) | p = 0.191 b 0.21 (0.02–1.42) |
Required Transfusion | 3 (7%) | 10 (25%) | p = 0.034 b 4.44 (1.12–17.57) |
Pneumonia | 1 (2%) | 4 (10%) | p = 0.191 b 4.67 (0.50–43.67) |
Urinary tract infection | 1 (2%) | 3 (7.5%) | p = 0.348 b 3.41 (0.34–34.17) |
Cardiovascular incidents | 3 (7%) | 5 (12.5%) | p = 0.473 b 1.90 (0.42–8.55) |
Wound infection | 1 (2%) | 2 (5%) | p = 0.607 b 2.21 (0.19–25.37) |
Gastrointestinal issues | - | 5 (12.5%) | - |
Reoperations | 2 (5%) | 2 (5%) | - |
Clavien–Dindo grade: | |||
0 | 30 (70%) | 16 (40%) | p = 0.008 b 0.29 (0.12–0.72) |
I | 4 (9%) | 5 (12.5%) | p = 0.732 b 1.39 (0.35–5.60) |
II | 5 (12%) | 10 (25%) | p = 0.155 b 2.53 (0.78–8.21) |
III | 2 (5%) | 4 (10%) | p = 0.422 b 2.28 (0.39–13.18) |
IV | 1 (2%) | - | - |
V | 1 (2%) | 4 (10%) | p = 0.191 b 4.67 (0.50–43.67) |
Discharge Location | Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) (n = 42) | Hemiarthroplasty (HA) (n = 36) | p-Value (Z-Score) |
---|---|---|---|
Home | 39 (93%) | 17 (47%) | p < 0.001 (4.46) |
Home with social care support | 3 (7%) | 11 (31%) | p = 0.007 (−2.69) |
Rehabilitation unit | - | 2 (6%) | p = 0.122 (−1.55) |
Nursing home | - | 6 (17%) | p = 0.006 (−2.75) |
Metrics | Value |
---|---|
Area Under the Curve (AUC) | 0.71 |
Optimal Cut-off (PML3 [mm2]) | 0.86 |
Sensitivity (%) | 68% |
Specificity (%) | 79% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Brzeszczyński, F.; Hamilton, D.; Dziedzic, A.; Synder, M.; Bończak, O. Sarcopenia Abdominal Muscle Mass Index Assessment Informs Surgical Decision-Making in Displaced Fractures of the Femoral Neck. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 2573. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082573
Brzeszczyński F, Hamilton D, Dziedzic A, Synder M, Bończak O. Sarcopenia Abdominal Muscle Mass Index Assessment Informs Surgical Decision-Making in Displaced Fractures of the Femoral Neck. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(8):2573. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082573
Chicago/Turabian StyleBrzeszczyński, Filip, David Hamilton, Angela Dziedzic, Marek Synder, and Oktawiusz Bończak. 2025. "Sarcopenia Abdominal Muscle Mass Index Assessment Informs Surgical Decision-Making in Displaced Fractures of the Femoral Neck" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 8: 2573. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082573
APA StyleBrzeszczyński, F., Hamilton, D., Dziedzic, A., Synder, M., & Bończak, O. (2025). Sarcopenia Abdominal Muscle Mass Index Assessment Informs Surgical Decision-Making in Displaced Fractures of the Femoral Neck. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(8), 2573. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082573