Next Article in Journal
Management of Acute Severe Colitis in the Era of Biologicals and Small Molecules
Next Article in Special Issue
Anti-PD-1 and Novel Combinations in the Treatment of Melanoma—An Update
Previous Article in Journal
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds—Dead End or Still a Rough Diamond?
Previous Article in Special Issue
PD-L1 Expression and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Thymic Epithelial Neoplasms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 8
Issue 12
10.3390/jcm8122168
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Basis of PD1/PD-L1 Therapies

by
Barbara Seliger
Institute for Medical Immunology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06112 Halle (Saale), Germany
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(12), 2168; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122168
Submission received: 30 October 2019 / Revised: 2 December 2019 / Accepted: 4 December 2019 / Published: 8 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Cancer Immunotherapy with Antibodies to the PD-1 and PD-L1 Pathway)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
It is obvious that tumor cells have developed a number of strategies to escape immune surveillance including an altered expression of various immune checkpoints, such as the programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1) and its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. The interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1 results in an activation of self-tolerance pathways in both immune cells as well as tumor cells. Thus, these molecules represent excellent targets for T cell-based immunotherapies. However, the efficacy of therapies using checkpoint inhibitors is variable and only a limited number of patients receive a long-term response, while others develop resistances. Therefore, a better insight into the constitutive expression levels and their control as well as the predictive and prognostic value of PD-1/PD-L1, which are controversially discussed due to the methodological assessment, the dynamic and time-related variable expression of these molecules, is urgently required. In this review, the current knowledge of the PD-L1 and PD-1 genes, their expression in immune and tumor cells, the underlying molecular mechanisms of their regulation and their association with clinical parameters and therapy responses are summarized.

1. Introduction

Recently, immunotherapy has a rekindled interest as an effective therapeutic approach for the treatment of various solid and hematopoietic cancers. However, tumors could efficiently suppress immune responses by activating negative regulatory pathways, also named immune checkpoints (iCP), which are involved in immune homeostasis or adopt features that enable tumor cells actively escaping immune cell elimination [1]. The prototypes and key players of these iCPs are the cytotoxic T lymphocyte protein-4 (CTLA-4) and the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), which are inhibitors of T cell proliferation and function [2,3]. Several studies demonstrated that tumors evade immune surveillance by deregulating survival and proliferation pathways including iCPs. The interaction of PD-1 with its ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2, provides an immune escape for tumor cells due to inhibition of T cell activation and cytokine production leading to the attenuation of T cell responses by blocking proliferation, apoptosis induction and differentiation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) [4,5]. While the PD-1 receptor is expressed on T cells upon activation during their priming and expansion, PD-L1 expression is heterogeneous and dynamic in tumors and immune cells. Structural alterations of the PD-L1 gene as well as its deregulated expression mediated by intracellular and extracellular factors are relevant modulators of PD-L1 expression.
It has been demonstrated that T cell responses could be stimulated by targeting this pathway with immune checkpoint inhibitors (iCPIs), which block the interaction of PD-1 with its ligands thereby overcoming the intrinsic resistance to immune surveillance by mounting anti-tumor immune responses [6,7,8]. This also leads to an improved outcome and increased survival of patients. However, PD-L1 expression alone is not sufficient as a predictive factor for stratification of patients responding to immunotherapy [9]. Recently, a link between PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and/or microsatellite instability with the response to iCPIs has been reported in different tumor types, including, e.g., non-small lung cell carcinoma (NSCLC), melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) [10,11]. However, despite the fact that PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy has shown remarkable clinical benefit for patients, durable response rates are only found in a minority of patients [12,13]. Therefore, an increased knowledge about the underlying molecular mechanisms that directly or indirectly alter the expression of PD-L1 is urgently needed to improve the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 directed immunotherapies alone or in combination with other therapies.

2. Characteristics of the PD1 Ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2

PD-L1, also known as B7 homolog1 (B7-H1) with homology to B7-1 and B7-2, PDCD1L1 or cluster of differentiation (CD)274, has been identified as a ligand of the co-inhibitory receptor PD-1 and is encoded by the CD274 gene localized on chromosome 9p24.1 [14,15]. Under physiologic conditions, it is constitutively expressed in different tissues, but mainly in activated T and B lymphocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), monocytes, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), bone marrow (BM)-derived mast cells and various immune privileged organs [16,17,18]. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression could be induced by γ-chain cytokines on T cells [15,19,20] and by IL-21 on CD19+ B cells. PD-L1 expression could also be induced by LPS or BCR activation in human B cells and by interferon (IFN)- γ on monocytes as well as on non-lymphoid cells including endothelial cells [19,21,22]. Due to its high evolutionally conserved expression, a functional importance of PD-L1 has been suggested. In addition, PD-L1 is often expressed in the setting of inflammation and/or on tumor cells of distinct origin [23]. In this context, it is also noteworthy, that there exists a broad distribution of PD-L1 in different cellular compartments [24]. These formats include not only membranous PD-L1 (mPD-L1) [25], but also cytoplasmic PD-L1 (cPD-L1) [26,27], nuclear PD-L1 (nPD-L1) [28], serum PD-L1 (sPD-L1) [29] and exosomal PD-L1 [30].
Concerning PD-L1 mRNA expression, two alternative transcripts are generated by the CD274 gene. The long transcript has seven exons with a coding sequence of approximately 800 base pairs (bp) and encodes for a 290 amino acid protein with a molecular weight of 33 kDa. It is a transmembrane glycoprotein and consists of a large extracellular region containing immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains, a hydrophobic transmembrane domain as well as cytoplasmic tail of 30 amino acids, which does not contain canonical signaling motifs [17]. Exon 1 encodes for the 5′ untranslated region (UTR), whereas exon 7 encodes for a part of the intracellular domain and the 3′ UTR. The second transcript is generated by alternative splicing and absence of the third exon thereby generating a shorter 160 aa isoform of PD-L1 lacking the IgV-like domain.
Furthermore, the PD-L1 promoter has CpG methylation sites with an approximately length of 220 bp suggesting an epigenetic control [31]. It is noteworthy that PD-L1 has a long 3′ untranslated region (3′ UTR) and a number of cis acting elements, which are involved in the mRNA decay. This represents a major determinant of mRNA abundance including an AU-rich element and potential binding sites for microRNAs (miRNA) as well as RNA binding proteins (RBP) [13,32].
The PD-L2 is the second ligand of PD1 sharing approximately 60% amino acid homology in humans to PD-L1 [22]. In contrast to PD-L1, PD-L2 expression is very restricted to activated DCs, macrophages, BM-derived mast cells and peritoneal B1 cells [33]. PD-L2 expression could be induced by LPS and BCR in B cells and by GM-CSF and IL-4 on DCs [22]. Both PD1 ligands are expressed on solid tumors as well as on hematopoietic malignancies, but PD-L2 is expressed to a lesser extent when compared to PD-L1 [34].

3. Features of PD-1—Molecular Structure and Expression

The receptor PD-1 (CD279) is a 288 amino acid protein composed of one N-terminal IgV-like domain with a 21%–33% sequence homology to CTLA-4, CD28 and ICOS, a transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic tail harboring two tyrosine-based signaling domains with an immune receptor tyrosine based inhibitory motif and an immune receptor tyrosine-based switch motif [35]. Constitutive PD-1 expression is expressed on immature CD4− and CD8− thymocytes, activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, but also on B cells, monocytes, NK cells and DCs. It can be also induced on APC, myeloid DC and monocytes via the transcription factors (TF) NFAT, NOTCH, FOXO1 and IRFs, while T-bet represses the transcription of PD-1 [36]. PD-1 expression can be induced by different cytokines, like IL-10 [37], the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β [38] and by chronic infection and cancer. High expression of PD-1 is a characteristic of exhausted T cells [39].

4. PD-1/PD-L1-Mediated Signal Transduction and Its Function

The interaction of PD-1 with its ligands has been shown to play an important role in the maintenance of the balance between autoimmunity and peripheral tolerance and impairs anti-viral and anti-tumoral immune responses [13,40]. Since the function of PD-L2 has so far not been elucidated in detail, the review will focus on the PD-1/PD-L1 axis. In contrast to other members of the CD28 family, PD1 transduces only signals when cross-linked together with the B cell or T cell antigen receptor thereby yielding co-inhibitory micro-clusters with the T cell receptor (TCR) and CD28. This results in the inhibition of glucose consumption, cytokine production, proliferation and survival of T lymphocytes. It further prevents the TF expression associated with the effector function including GATA-3, T-bet and Eomes [41]. PD-1 ligation caused a reduced phosphorylation of CD3, ZAP70 and protein kinase C [42], inhibits ERK activation in T cells and the calcium mobilization and phosphorylation of Igβ, Syk, PLC-γ2 and ERK in B cells [43]. Thus, PD-1 ligation attenuates TCR-mediated signaling and impairs the activity of the PI3K-Akt and the Ras/MEK/ERK pathway [44]. One of the mechanisms, by which PD-1 inhibits activation of the PI3K-Akt pathway, includes PTEN phosphorylation and phosphatase activity [45]. This leads to an inhibition of the expression of Skp2 and Cdk2 as well as in increase of p27kip1 [46]. The binding of PD-1 to PD-L1 on different cell types contributes to distinct functions. In effector T cells, PD-1 blocks their activity in many ways by inhibiting, e.g., cell cycle progression by affecting multiple regulators of the cell cycle, proliferation, survival and cytokine production [14,15,47]. Furthermore, PD-1 is involved in the TGF-β-mediated signaling of Tregs leading to their proliferation. Ras-PD-1 regulates SWAT3 and synergizes with TGF-β-mediated signals [46]. Next to this, PD-1 ligation alters the metabolic program of activated T cells thereby generating a more oxidative microenvironment [48,49]. PD-1 signaling is well understood and has been recently extensively reviewed [50], while only limited information on PD-L1 signaling is available. However, there exists evidence of a reverse signaling via cross-binding with mAbs.

5. Altered PD-L1 Expression in Tumors

PD-L1 is abundantly expressed on various cancer cells [51,52] and has been extensively summarized in various reviews [13,53]. The discrepancy of some results might be due to inadequate sampling of the tumor and insufficient sensitivity of the detection method/antibody used for immunohistochemistry (IHC). Therefore, strong efforts are currently performed to harmonize the staining of PD-L1 [54]. Next to the analytical variability, PD-L1-specific IHC might not reflect the tumor status due to individuality and tumor heterogeneity [55]. The intra-tumoral heterogeneity is common, varying temporal and in scale and was also present between primary tumors and metastases [56]. PD-L1 is also expressed on non-tumor cells of the tumor microenvironment (TME) including macrophages, myeloid DC, MDSC and fibroblasts [57]. Based on its expression pattern and its association with clinical parameters like, e.g., prognosis and patients’ survival [58], PD-L1 expression has been suggested as a biomarker for PD1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy and response. It must also be taken into account that tumor cells can secrete a vast majority of PD-L1 via exosomes, which promote tumor growth by suppressing T cell function in vitro and in vivo [59]. It is critical to understand how the PD-L1 expression levels are generally regulated and whether this regulation is distinct in immune and tumor cells. Therefore, the highly complex regulation of PD-L1 summarized in Table 1 will be discussed in the following sections.

6. Genetic Alterations of PD-L1

6.1. Structural Alterations of PD-L1—Loss and Gain

So far, the underlying molecular mechanisms that govern the expression levels of PD-L1 are not well understood, but could be caused by genetic abnormalities. Over the last years, aberrant PD-L1 expression in tumors and immune cells could be due to structural alterations, such as DNA copy number alterations (CNA) mediated by gene deletions or gene amplifications as well as translocations. In large B cell lymphoma, a translocation was found in 20%, an amplification in 29% of cases [60]. Interestingly, deletions of PD-L1 were more frequently found than gains and were most prominent in melanoma as well as NSCLC [61,62]. In many cancer types, copy number gains (CNG) were found in focal regions, chromosome 9p24.1 or in the whole of chromosome 9, which correlated with increased PD-L1 expression levels and response to iCPI therapy as determined by analysis of datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) of different cancer types [63]. The frequency of CNG varied between 7% and 14% depending on the tumor entity analyzed and were detected in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), CRC, cervical, bladder and lung cancers as well as in sarcomas [64,65,66,67,68]. PD-L1 amplification and deletion were associated with TMB evaluated by next generation sequencing based comprehensive profiling [69,70]. However, PD-L1 amplifications did not always correlate with high positive PD-L1 expression determined by IHC [71]. PD-L1 CNGs were in particular found in NSCLC of smokers with mutations and EML4-ALK rearrangements [72]. In NSCLC, CD274 amplifications associated with an increased PD-L1 expression, which co-occurred with Janus Kinase (JAK)2 amplifications [73]. In cervical, lung and squamous cell cancers, PD-L1 amplification was frequently accompanied by an amplification of the PD-L2 gene [68], while in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), genomic amplification of 9p24.1 was found [74,75]. It is noteworthy that PD-L1 amplification was present primary tumors and associated metastasis with a concordance rate of 73%.

6.2. PD-1 and CD274 Polymorphisms

There exist only little data on the impact of PD-L1 polymorphisms on PD-L1 expression. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs4143815C>G in the 3′ UTR of PD-L1 has been associated with an increased cancer risk and might be used as biomarker to predict the susceptibility to cancer [76]. Two polymorphisms characterized by >G changes localized in the 5′ UTR of PD-L1 serve as binding site for SP1 [77] thereby affecting PD-L1 expression. Thus, variations in the PD-L1 promoter could lead to an overexpression. In addition, a number of polymorphisms were also described in PD-1, which were associated with the risk of susceptibility of different cancers [78].

7. Control of PD-L1 Expression

7.1. Control of PD-L1 Expression by Aberrant Oncogenic Signaling

The upregulation of PD-L1 expression could be a consequence of constitutive oncogenic signaling in tumor cells. Indeed, overexpression of the MYC oncogene detected in approximately 70% of cancers [79] leads to an upregulation of PD-L1 expression mediated by binding of MYC to the PD-L1 promoter [80]. Vice versa inhibition of MYC results in downregulation of PD-L1 expression [80,81]. Signaling via the PIK3/AKT/mTOR pathways also control immune surveillance, while PTEN loss and mutations in PIK3CA induce the activation of the AKT/mTOR pathway thereby increasing PD-L1 expression [82], which could be associated with immune resistance [45]. The EGF-R expression is a strong independent predictive marker of PD-L1 overexpression, while inhibition of EGF-R expression using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) leads to a downregulation of PD-L1 expression [83,84]. Thus, PD-L1 expression can be induced by EGF signaling and enhanced by activating mutations in the EGF-R gene and contributes to the EGF-R-driven immune escape [85]. In addition, the Ras/Raf/MEK/MAPK-ERK pathway was also linked to PD-L1 overexpression in various cancers, while respective inhibitors lead to a downregulation of PD-L1 expression [86,87]. PD-L1 expression could be upregulated by cell contact. Furthermore, a cell-dependent juxtacrine signaling via the membrane receptor tyrosine kinase ephrin receptor A10 (EphA10) was demonstrated to upregulate PD-L1 expression [88].

7.2. Transcriptional Regulation of PD-L1 Expression by Inflammatory Signals

PD-L1 expression is induced by local inflammatory signals as well as by interferon (IFN)-γ produced by T lymphocytes in multiple tumor types [51], but also on healthy tissues and immune cells, but the effect of IFN-γ on PD-L1 expression is context-dependent. The inhibition of the NF-κB pathway impairs the IFN-γ-mediated induction of PD-L1 expression [89], which is in line with the inhibition/downregulation of PD-L1 expression by inhibitors directed against NF-ĸB, JAK1/JAK2 and BTK [90]. In addition to IFN-γ, type I IFNs can also induce PD-L1 expression [91]. Other inflammatory stimuli affecting PD-L1 expression in tumors include lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by triggering TLR4, TNF-α and IL-4 and in DC, in particular IL-1β, IL-6, IL-27, IL-10 and TGF-β [13] (summarized by Sun et al., 2018). Furthermore, chemotherapeutics, such as anthracycline and taxane up-regulate PD-L1 expression in some subtypes of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) via NF-KB [92]. Next to the transcriptional control of PD-L1 expression, epigenetic mechanisms could lead to altered expression.

7.3. Epigenetic Deregulation of PD-L1 in Tumors

Epigenetic alterations such as promoter DNA methylation and histone modifications play an important role in the regulation of PD-L1 expression [31,93]. As already mentioned, a CpG island has been identified in the 5′ UTR of the PD-L1 in gene. Hypermethylation of the CD274 promoter leads to a reduced/lack of PD-L1 expression, which could be reverted by the treatment of cells with the demethylating agents 5-azacytidin (5-AZA), which increased the expression of PD-L1 expression at the mRNA and protein level [94]. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), this was accompanied by host dependent upregulation of not only PD-L1, but also PD-1 mRNA [95]. Molecular analyses demonstrated the high density of methylation at the CpG islands in the promoter region. Hypermethylation of the PD-L1 promoter was correlated with lower PD-L1 expression, while a strong hypomethylation was significantly associated with increased expression of CTLA-4 and PD-1. Thus, PD-L1 promoter methylation may provide a potentially more effective immunotherapeutic strategy in some tumor patients. Since PD-L1 overexpression transiently occurs during the cytokine-driven epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT), a strong link between PD-L1 promoter demethylation and the TGF-β signaling pathway was found, which was associated with the loss of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) in lung cancer cells [96].

7.4. Disruption of the PD-L1 3′ Untranslated Region

The 3′ UTR of many genes is important in the mRNA decay resulting in altered protein expression levels. Structural alterations leading to the disruption of the 3′ UTR of the PD-L1 gene have been recently described [97] and appear to be highly common in different cancer types including T cell leukemia/lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma and stomach adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, disruption of the PD-L1 3′ UTR in mice enables immune evasion of tumor cells with elevated PD-L1 expression, which is actively inhibited by immune checkpoint blockade. Abnormalities in the 3′ UTR could on the one hand induce a stabilization of PD-L1 transcripts, while the 3′ UTR has also potential microRNA (miRNA) binding sites, which are involved in intra-tumoral immune suppression. Indeed, a mutation in the 3′ UTR has been shown to disrupt the miR-570 binding thereby enhancing PD-L1 expression [98]. The lack of the C-terminal region of PD-L1 could induce variations in the efficacy of different anti-PD-L1 antibodies in protein detection.

7.5. MicroRNAs Targeting PD-L1

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs of about 20 nucleotides in length and represent next to RNA binding proteins (RBPs) the main posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression by binding to the 3′ UTR of target genes, but also to coding sequences [99]. MiRNA expression is deregulated in human cancers and function as oncogene and tumor suppressor genes. Recently, an increasing number of studies have identified miRNAs with an immunomodulatory potential [100]. For the identification of PD-L1 specific miRNAs, different approaches were used, such as mRNA prediction tools, RNA sequencing as well as miTRAP in combination with RNAseq. A number of miRNAs targeting the 3′ UTR of PD-L1 were found in different murine and human tumor models leading to a downregulation of PD-L1 expression, which has been recently summarized [13]. This was in some cases associated with an inhibition of tumor growth, invasion, cell migration and EMT as well as enhanced T cell responses and reduced chemoresistance. In contrast to the inhibition mediated by directly binding of miRNAs to the 3′ UTR of PD-L1 thereby contributing to an altered transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation, there exist little information about the indirect modulation of miR-mediated signaling networks driving PD-L1 expression. MiR-197 is a negative modulator of PD-L1 expression, which is mediated via the CKS1B-STAT3 cascade in association with the overexpression of various genes like cyclin D1, survivin, c-myc and Bcl2, in lung and oral squamous cancer [101,102]. MiR-20, miR-21 and miR-130b repress the expression of PTEN, which results in an increased PD-L1 expression. So far, RBPs binding to the 3′ UTR of PD-L1 have not yet been identified, but have been suggested to be also involved in the regulation of PD-L1 expression. In contrast, deregulation of PD-L1 by long-noncoding RNAs (lnRNAs) has been reported [103]. For example, the lncRNA small nucleolar RNA host gene SNHG20 modulates the expression of PD-L1 and JAK2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Others include the lncRNAs HOTTIP [104], SNHG14 [105] and MALAT1 [106,107].

7.6. Posttranslational Modifications of PD-L1

Posttranscriptional regulation of PD-L1 expression has been recently explored by various researchers and could be mediated by protein glycosylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation acetylation as well as lysosomal degradation [108,109,110]. Alterations of these post-translational modifications (PTMs) might influence the PD-L1 mediated immune resistance and might represent potential targets for enhancing anti-tumor immune responses.
PD-L1 is highly glycosylated resulting in heterogeneous protein expression patterns [111]. The CD33 kDa form represents the non-glycosylated PD-L1 protein, while upon glycosylation the MW of PD-L1 ranges between 45 and 55 kDa. Inhibitors of N-linked, but not O-linked glycosylation alters the migratory shift of PD-L1 suggesting that PD-L1 is primarily N-glycosylated. The glycosylation leads to a stabilization of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells including cancer stem cells with a 4-fold longer protein half-life [111], which is associated with escape from immune surveillance. Thus, a direct targeting of PD-L1 glycosylation might be an effective strategy to improve iCPI therapy [110]. Indeed, TNBCs were eliminated by targeting glycosylation [112]. Furthermore, the non-glycosylated PD-L1 can be degraded by the ubiquitin proteasome system after phosphorylation. Thus, targeting of the PD-L1 poly-ubiquitination might be an alternative approach to enhance immune checkpoint therapy. PD-L1 is subjected to acetylation tyrosine-phosphorylation as well as mono-ubiquitination upon EGF stimulation. Thus, PTMs have emerged as an important aspect in the PD-L1 regulation. However, so far it is not clear, how PTMs influence the subcellular localization of PD-L1 thereby contributing to the function of intracellular PD-L1 expression.
Several regulators of PD-L1 expression were described. CMTMG, a type-3 transmembrane protein, was identified to control PD-L1 expression in different tumor cells and in LPS-stimulated DC [108,113]. It associates with the PD-L1 protein leading to a reduced ubiquitination and on increased PD-L1 protein half-life. Furthermore, CDK4 is a negative regulator of PD-L1 function by indirectly regulating its ubiquitination [114]. Another possible interaction between PD-L1 and the glycogen synthetase kinase 3b was described leading to an increased PD-L1 degradation [111].

7.7. State of the Art PD-1/PD-L1 Based Immunotherapy and Therapy Resistances

Blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis with the anti-PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab as well as the anti-PD-L1 antibodies atelizumab, avelumab and durvalumab has been approved for the treatment of various cancers. This includes melanoma, NSCLC, RCC, HNSCC, urothelial and hepatocellular carcinoma, TNBC, CRC and gastric cancer. Merkel cell carcinoma and Hodgkin’s lymphoma as standard therapy and/or alone and in combination with other therapies in clinical phase II and III trials, which have been recently summarized in a number of reviews [115,116,117]. Despite the complete, partial and overall response rate highly varied between the tumor types analysed and iCPI employed, the progression-free and the overall survival was improved in almost all subgroups of patients independent of PDL1 expression. However, there are patients that are not benefitting from this treatment, including patients with tumors carrying EGF-R mutations [118]. Similar holds for the use of PD-L1 expression as a predictive marker to guide the iCPI treatment. Thus, the identification of novel predictive biomarkers for iCPI therapy is urgently required, since the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in tumors could also have significant implications for its accuracy as predictive marker and for therapy response [56,119]. This may include HLA class I antigens and components of the antigen processing as well as type I and type II IFN pathways [120]. Defects in these molecules and an increased canonical signaling have recently been shown to be associated with intrinsic and/or acquired resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition [121,122,123,124]. A systematic meta-analysis revealed that a high TMB could also predict the improved efficacy of iCPI in cancers suggesting that targeted next generation sequencing for estimating TMB might be standardized to eliminate heterogeneity [125,126].

8. Conclusions

Despite PD-L1 expression has been determined in a vast number of tumors of distinct origin and correlated to clinical parameters and response to PD-1/PD-L1 iCPI, its value as biomarker for prognosis and therapy response is still discussed. Therefore, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of its heterogeneous expression is required. In-depth analysis of molecular processes revealed a complex control of PD-L1 expression, which varies from structural abnormalities to deregulation mediated by transcriptional, epigenetic, post-transcriptional and posttranslational level. This increased knowledge might also offer novel opportunities for the treatment of tumors by targeting, e.g., respective signal pathways, PTMs or epigenetic modifications.

Funding

The work was partially sponsored by the the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK 1591-B2 to BS.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Maria Heise for secretarial help.

Conflicts of Interest

There exist no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

5-AZA, 5-azacytidin; ACT, adoptive cell therapy; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; B7-H1, B7homolog1; BM, bone marrow; CD, cluster of differentiation; CDS, coding sequence; CNA, copy number alterations; CNG, copy number gains; CRC, colorectal carcinoma; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated protein-4; DC, dendritic cells; DNA1, deoxyribonucleic acid 1; DNMT1, DNA methyltransferase 1; EGF-R, epidermal growth factor receptor; EMT, epithelial to mesemchymal transition; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; HNSCC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; HPV, human papilloma virus; iCPI, immune checkpoint inhibitors; IFN, interferon; Ig, immunoglobulin; IHC, immunohistochemistry; JAK, janus kinase; lncRNA, long non-coding RNA; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MDSC, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; miRNA, microRNA; MSI, multispectral imaging; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NSCLC, non-small cell lung carcinoma; OSCC, oral squamous cell carcinoma; OS, overall survival; PD-1, programmed cell death-1; PD-L1, programmed death ligand 1; PD-L2, programmed death ligand 2; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10; PTM, post-translational modification; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RFS, recurrence free survival; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TCR, T cell receptor; TF, transcription factor; TGF, transforming growth factor; TIL, tumor infiltrating lymphocyte; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitors; TMB, tumor mutational burden; TME, tumor microenvironment; TNBC, triple negative breast cancer; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; Treg, regulatory T cell; 3′ UTR, 3′ untranslated region.

References

  1. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Melero, I.; Berman, D.M.; Aznar, M.A.; Korman, A.J.; Perez Gracia, J.L.; Haanen, J. Evolving synergistic combinations of targeted immunotherapies to combat cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 457–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mahoney, K.M.; Rennert, P.D.; Freeman, G.J. Combination cancer immunotherapy and new immunomodulatory targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 561–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pardoll, D.M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2012, 12, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Chen, D.S.; Mellman, I. Elements of cancer immunity and the cancer-immune set point. Nature 2017, 541, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fabrizio, F.P.; Trombetta, D.; Rossi, A.; Sparaneo, A.; Castellana, S.; Muscarella, L.A. Gene code cd274/pd-l1: From molecular basis toward cancer immunotherapy. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2018, 10, 1758835918815598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Bardhan, K.; Anagnostou, T.; Boussiotis, V.A. The pd1:Pd-l1/2 pathway from discovery to clinical implementation. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nishino, M.; Ramaiya, N.H.; Hatabu, H.; Hodi, F.S. Monitoring immune-checkpoint blockade: Response evaluation and biomarker development. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 14, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Patel, S.P.; Kurzrock, R. Pd-l1 expression as a predictive biomarker in cancer immunotherapy. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2015, 14, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Madore, J.; Strbenac, D.; Vilain, R.; Menzies, A.M.; Yang, J.Y.; Thompson, J.F.; Long, G.V.; Mann, G.J.; Scolyer, R.A.; Wilmott, J.S. Pd-l1 negative status is associated with lower mutation burden, differential expression of immune-related genes, and worse survival in stage iii melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 3915–3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hellmann, M.D.; Callahan, M.K.; Awad, M.M.; Calvo, E.; Ascierto, P.A.; Atmaca, A.; Rizvi, N.A.; Hirsch, F.R.; Selvaggi, G.; Szustakowski, J.D.; et al. Tumor mutational burden and efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy and in combination with ipilimumab in small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Cell 2018, 33, 853–861 e854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pitt, J.M.; Vetizou, M.; Daillere, R.; Roberti, M.P.; Yamazaki, T.; Routy, B.; Lepage, P.; Boneca, I.G.; Chamaillard, M.; Kroemer, G.; et al. Resistance mechanisms to immune-checkpoint blockade in cancer: Tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors. Immunity 2016, 44, 1255–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Sun, C.; Mezzadra, R.; Schumacher, T.N. Regulation and function of the pd-l1 checkpoint. Immunity 2018, 48, 434–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Freeman, G.J.; Long, A.J.; Iwai, Y.; Bourque, K.; Chernova, T.; Nishimura, H.; Fitz, L.J.; Malenkovich, N.; Okazaki, T.; Byrne, M.C.; et al. Engagement of the pd-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel b7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Dong, H.; Zhu, G.; Tamada, K.; Chen, L. B7-h1, a third member of the b7 family, co-stimulates t-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 1365–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yamazaki, T.; Akiba, H.; Iwai, H.; Matsuda, H.; Aoki, M.; Tanno, Y.; Shin, T.; Tsuchiya, H.; Pardoll, D.M.; Okumura, K.; et al. Expression of programmed death 1 ligands by murine t cells and apc. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 5538–5545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Keir, M.E.; Butte, M.J.; Freeman, G.J.; Sharpe, A.H. Pd-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Ann. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 26, 677–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Holets, L.M.; Hunt, J.S.; Petroff, M.G. Trophoblast cd274 (b7-h1) is differentially expressed across gestation: Influence of oxygen concentration. Biol. Reprod. 2006, 74, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Selenko-Gebauer, N.; Majdic, O.; Szekeres, A.; Hofler, G.; Guthann, E.; Korthauer, U.; Zlabinger, G.; Steinberger, P.; Pickl, W.F.; Stockinger, H.; et al. B7-h1 (programmed death-1 ligand) on dendritic cells is involved in the induction and maintenance of t cell anergy. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 3637–3644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lee, S.J.; Jang, B.C.; Lee, S.W.; Yang, Y.I.; Suh, S.I.; Park, Y.M.; Oh, S.; Shin, J.G.; Yao, S.; Chen, L.; et al. Interferon regulatory factor-1 is prerequisite to the constitutive expression and ifn-gamma-induced upregulation of b7-h1 (cd274). FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Eppihimer, M.J.; Gunn, J.; Freeman, G.J.; Greenfield, E.A.; Chernova, T.; Erickson, J.; Leonard, J.P. Expression and regulation of the pd-l1 immunoinhibitory molecule on microvascular endothelial cells. Microcirculation 2002, 9, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Latchman, Y.; Wood, C.R.; Chernova, T.; Chaudhary, D.; Borde, M.; Chernova, I.; Iwai, Y.; Long, A.J.; Brown, J.A.; Nunes, R.; et al. Pd-l2 is a second ligand for pd-1 and inhibits t cell activation. Nat. Immunol. 2001, 2, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. O’Leary, N.A.; Wright, M.W.; Brister, J.R.; Ciufo, S.; Haddad, D.; McVeigh, R.; Rajput, B.; Robbertse, B.; Smith-White, B.; Ako-Adjei, D.; et al. Reference sequence (refseq) database at ncbi: Current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D733–D745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Wu, Y.; Chen, W.; Xu, Z.P.; Gu, W. Pd-l1 distribution and perspective for cancer immunotherapy-blockade, knockdown, or inhibition. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Ukpo, O.C.; Thorstad, W.L.; Lewis, J.S., Jr. B7-h1 expression model for immune evasion in human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2013, 7, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hua, D.; Sun, J.; Mao, Y.; Chen, L.J.; Wu, Y.Y.; Zhang, X.G. B7-h1 expression is associated with expansion of regulatory t cells in colorectal carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 971–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chowdhury, S.; Veyhl, J.; Jessa, F.; Polyakova, O.; Alenzi, A.; MacMillan, C.; Ralhan, R.; Walfish, P.G. Programmed death-ligand 1 overexpression is a prognostic marker for aggressive papillary thyroid cancer and its variants. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 32318–32328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ghebeh, H.; Lehe, C.; Barhoush, E.; Al-Romaih, K.; Tulbah, A.; Al-Alwan, M.; Hendrayani, S.F.; Manogaran, P.; Alaiya, A.; Al-Tweigeri, T.; et al. Doxorubicin downregulates cell surface b7-h1 expression and upregulates its nuclear expression in breast cancer cells: Role of b7-h1 as an anti-apoptotic molecule. Breast Cancer Res. 2010, 12, R48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Frigola, X.; Inman, B.A.; Krco, C.J.; Liu, X.; Harrington, S.M.; Bulur, P.A.; Dietz, A.B.; Dong, H.; Kwon, E.D. Soluble b7-h1: Differences in production between dendritic cells and t cells. Immunol. Lett. 2012, 142, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Xie, F.; Xu, M.; Lu, J.; Mao, L.; Wang, S. The role of exosomal pd-l1 in tumor progression and immunotherapy. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Kumar, S.; Sharawat, S.K. Epigenetic regulators of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in human cancers. Transl. Res. 2018, 202, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, Q.; Lin, W.; Tang, X.; Li, S.; Guo, L.; Lin, Y.; Kwok, H.F. The roles of micrornas in regulating the expression of pd-1/pd-l1 immune checkpoint. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhong, X.; Tumang, J.R.; Gao, W.; Bai, C.; Rothstein, T.L. Pd-l2 expression extends beyond dendritic cells/macrophages to b1 cells enriched for v(h)11/v(h)12 and phosphatidylcholine binding. Eur. J. Immunol. 2007, 37, 2405–2410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ohigashi, Y.; Sho, M.; Yamada, Y.; Tsurui, Y.; Hamada, K.; Ikeda, N.; Mizuno, T.; Yoriki, R.; Kashizuka, H.; Yane, K.; et al. Clinical significance of programmed death-1 ligand-1 and programmed death-1 ligand-2 expression in human esophageal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 2947–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zak, K.M.; Kitel, R.; Przetocka, S.; Golik, P.; Guzik, K.; Musielak, B.; Domling, A.; Dubin, G.; Holak, T.A. Structure of the complex of human programmed death 1, pd-1, and its ligand pd-l1. Structure 2015, 23, 2341–2348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ishida, Y.; Agata, Y.; Shibahara, K.; Honjo, T. Induced expression of pd-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 3887–3895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, Z.; Fourcade, J.; Pagliano, O.; Chauvin, J.M.; Sander, C.; Kirkwood, J.M.; Zarour, H.M. Il10 and pd-1 cooperate to limit the activity of tumor-specific cd8+ t cells. Cancer Res. 2015, 75, 1635–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Park, B.V.; Freeman, Z.T.; Ghasemzadeh, A.; Chattergoon, M.A.; Rutebemberwa, A.; Steigner, J.; Winter, M.E.; Huynh, T.V.; Sebald, S.M.; Lee, S.J.; et al. Tgfbeta1-mediated smad3 enhances pd-1 expression on antigen-specific t cells in cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016, 6, 1366–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wherry, E.J.; Kurachi, M. Molecular and cellular insights into t cell exhaustion. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 486–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yearley, J.H.; Gibson, C.; Yu, N.; Moon, C.; Murphy, E.; Juco, J.; Lunceford, J.; Cheng, J.; Chow, L.Q.M.; Seiwert, T.Y.; et al. Pd-l2 expression in human tumors: Relevance to anti-pd-1 therapy in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 3158–3167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Nurieva, R.; Thomas, S.; Nguyen, T.; Martin-Orozco, N.; Wang, Y.; Kaja, M.K.; Yu, X.Z.; Dong, C. T-cell tolerance or function is determined by combinatorial costimulatory signals. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 2623–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Sheppard, K.A.; Fitz, L.J.; Lee, J.M.; Benander, C.; George, J.A.; Wooters, J.; Qiu, Y.; Jussif, J.M.; Carter, L.L.; Wood, C.R.; et al. Pd-1 inhibits t-cell receptor induced phosphorylation of the zap70/cd3zeta signalosome and downstream signaling to pkctheta. FEBS Lett. 2004, 574, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Okazaki, T.; Maeda, A.; Nishimura, H.; Kurosaki, T.; Honjo, T. Pd-1 immunoreceptor inhibits b cell receptor-mediated signaling by recruiting src homology 2-domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase 2 to phosphotyrosine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 13866–13871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Parry, R.V.; Chemnitz, J.M.; Frauwirth, K.A.; Lanfranco, A.R.; Braunstein, I.; Kobayashi, S.V.; Linsley, P.S.; Thompson, C.B.; Riley, J.L. Ctla-4 and pd-1 receptors inhibit t-cell activation by distinct mechanisms. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25, 9543–9553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Parsa, A.T.; Waldron, J.S.; Panner, A.; Crane, C.A.; Parney, I.F.; Barry, J.J.; Cachola, K.E.; Murray, J.C.; Tihan, T.; Jensen, M.C.; et al. Loss of tumor suppressor pten function increases b7-h1 expression and immunoresistance in glioma. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Patsoukis, N.; Brown, J.; Petkova, V.; Liu, F.; Li, L.; Boussiotis, V.A. Selective effects of pd-1 on akt and ras pathways regulate molecular components of the cell cycle and inhibit t cell proliferation. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5, ra46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Butte, M.J.; Keir, M.E.; Phamduy, T.B.; Sharpe, A.H.; Freeman, G.J. Programmed death-1 ligand 1 interacts specifically with the b7-1 costimulatory molecule to inhibit t cell responses. Immunity 2007, 27, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Patsoukis, N.; Bardhan, K.; Chatterjee, P.; Sari, D.; Liu, B.; Bell, L.N.; Karoly, E.D.; Freeman, G.J.; Petkova, V.; Seth, P.; et al. Pd-1 alters t-cell metabolic reprogramming by inhibiting glycolysis and promoting lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tkachev, V.; Goodell, S.; Opipari, A.W.; Hao, L.Y.; Franchi, L.; Glick, G.D.; Ferrara, J.L.; Byersdorfer, C.A. Programmed death-1 controls t cell survival by regulating oxidative metabolism. J. Immunol. 2015, 194, 5789–5800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dermani, F.K.; Samadi, P.; Rahmani, G.; Kohlan, A.K.; Najafi, R. Pd-1/pd-l1 immune checkpoint: Potential target for cancer therapy. J. Cell Physiol. 2019, 234, 1313–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dong, H.; Strome, S.E.; Salomao, D.R.; Tamura, H.; Hirano, F.; Flies, D.B.; Roche, P.C.; Lu, J.; Zhu, G.; Tamada, K.; et al. Tumor-associated b7-h1 promotes t-cell apoptosis: A potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat. Med. 2002, 8, 793–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Iwai, Y.; Ishida, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Okazaki, T.; Honjo, T.; Minato, N. Involvement of pd-l1 on tumor cells in the escape from host immune system and tumor immunotherapy by pd-l1 blockade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 12293–12297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Liu, X.; Guo, C.Y.; Tou, F.F.; Wen, X.M.; Kuang, Y.K.; Zhu, Q.; Hu, H. Association of pd-l1 expression status with the efficacy of pd-1/pd-l1 inhibitors and overall survival in solid tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Cancer 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hirsch, F.R.; McElhinny, A.; Stanforth, D.; Ranger-Moore, J.; Jansson, M.; Kulangara, K.; Richardson, W.; Towne, P.; Hanks, D.; Vennapusa, B.; et al. Pd-l1 immunohistochemistry assays for lung cancer: Results from phase 1 of the blueprint pd-l1 ihc assay comparison project. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2017, 12, 208–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bassanelli, M.; Sioletic, S.; Martini, M.; Giacinti, S.; Viterbo, A.; Staddon, A.; Liberati, F.; Ceribelli, A. Heterogeneity of pd-l1 expression and relationship with biology of nsclc. Anticancer Res. 2018, 38, 3789–3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Haragan, A.; Field, J.K.; Davies, M.P.A.; Escriu, C.; Gruver, A.; Gosney, J.R. Heterogeneity of pd-l1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: Implications for specimen sampling in predicting treatment response. Lung Cancer 2019, 134, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Marzec, M.; Zhang, Q.; Goradia, A.; Raghunath, P.N.; Liu, X.; Paessler, M.; Wang, H.Y.; Wysocka, M.; Cheng, M.; Ruggeri, B.A.; et al. Oncogenic kinase npm/alk induces through stat3 expression of immunosuppressive protein cd274 (pd-l1, b7-h1). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 20852–20857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Reck, M.; Kerr, K.M.; Grohe, C.; Manegold, C.; Pavlakis, N.; Paz-Ares, L.; Huber, R.M.; Popat, S.; Thatcher, N.; Park, K.; et al. Defining aggressive or early progressing nononcogene-addicted non-small-cell lung cancer: A separate disease entity? Future Oncol. 2019, 15, 1363–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Poggio, M.; Hu, T.; Pai, C.C.; Chu, B.; Belair, C.D.; Chang, A.; Montabana, E.; Lang, U.E.; Fu, Q.; Fong, L.; et al. Suppression of exosomal pd-l1 induces systemic anti-tumor immunity and memory. Cell 2019, 177, 414–427 e413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Twa, D.D.; Chan, F.C.; Ben-Neriah, S.; Woolcock, B.W.; Mottok, A.; Tan, K.L.; Slack, G.W.; Gunawardana, J.; Lim, R.S.; McPherson, A.W.; et al. Genomic rearrangements involving programmed death ligands are recurrent in primary mediastinal large b-cell lymphoma. Blood 2014, 123, 2062–2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. George, J.; Saito, M.; Tsuta, K.; Iwakawa, R.; Shiraishi, K.; Scheel, A.H.; Uchida, S.; Watanabe, S.I.; Nishikawa, R.; Noguchi, M.; et al. Genomic amplification of cd274 (pd-l1) in small-cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 1220–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ansell, S.M.; Lesokhin, A.M.; Borrello, I.; Halwani, A.; Scott, E.C.; Gutierrez, M.; Schuster, S.J.; Millenson, M.M.; Cattry, D.; Freeman, G.J.; et al. Pd-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory hodgkin’s lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Budczies, J.; Denkert, C.; Gyorffy, B.; Schirmacher, P.; Stenzinger, A. Chromosome 9p copy number gains involving pd-l1 are associated with a specific proliferation and immune-modulating gene expression program active across major cancer types. BMC Med. Genom. 2017, 10, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Budczies, J.; Mechtersheimer, G.; Denkert, C.; Klauschen, F.; Mughal, S.S.; Chudasama, P.; Bockmayr, M.; Johrens, K.; Endris, V.; Lier, A.; et al. Pd-l1 (cd274) copy number gain, expression, and immune cell infiltration as candidate predictors for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in soft-tissue sarcoma. Oncoimmunology 2017, 6, e1279777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Straub, M.; Drecoll, E.; Pfarr, N.; Weichert, W.; Langer, R.; Hapfelmeier, A.; Gotz, C.; Wolff, K.D.; Kolk, A.; Specht, K. Cd274/pd-l1 gene amplification and pd-l1 protein expression are common events in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 12024–12034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Budczies, J.; Bockmayr, M.; Denkert, C.; Klauschen, F.; Groschel, S.; Darb-Esfahani, S.; Pfarr, N.; Leichsenring, J.; Onozato, M.L.; Lennerz, J.K.; et al. Pan-cancer analysis of copy number changes in programmed death-ligand 1 (pd-l1, cd274)—Associations with gene expression, mutational load, and survival. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2016, 55, 626–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Howitt, B.E.; Sun, H.H.; Roemer, M.G.; Kelley, A.; Chapuy, B.; Aviki, E.; Pak, C.; Connelly, C.; Gjini, E.; Shi, Y.; et al. Genetic basis for pd-l1 expression in squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix and vulva. JAMA Oncol. 2016, 2, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Inoue, Y.; Yoshimura, K.; Mori, K.; Kurabe, N.; Kahyo, T.; Mori, H.; Kawase, A.; Tanahashi, M.; Ogawa, H.; Inui, N.; et al. Clinical significance of pd-l1 and pd-l2 copy number gains in non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 32113–32128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Stadler, Z.K.; Battaglin, F.; Middha, S.; Hechtman, J.F.; Tran, C.; Cercek, A.; Yaeger, R.; Segal, N.H.; Varghese, A.M.; Reidy-Lagunes, D.L.; et al. Reliable detection of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancers using mutational load in next-generation sequencing panels. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 2141–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Yarchoan, M.; Hopkins, A.; Jaffee, E.M. Tumor mutational burden and response rate to pd-1 inhibition. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2500–2501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Goodman, A.M.; Piccioni, D.; Kato, S.; Boichard, A.; Wang, H.Y.; Frampton, G.; Lippman, S.M.; Connelly, C.; Fabrizio, D.; Miller, V.; et al. Prevalence of pdl1 amplification and preliminary response to immune checkpoint blockade in solid tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Ota, K.; Azuma, K.; Kawahara, A.; Hattori, S.; Iwama, E.; Tanizaki, J.; Harada, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Takayama, K.; Takamori, S.; et al. Induction of pd-l1 expression by the eml4-alk oncoprotein and downstream signaling pathways in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 4014–4021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Ikeda, S.; Okamoto, T.; Okano, S.; Umemoto, Y.; Tagawa, T.; Morodomi, Y.; Kohno, M.; Shimamatsu, S.; Kitahara, H.; Suzuki, Y.; et al. Pd-l1 is upregulated by simultaneous amplification of the pd-l1 and jak2 genes in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2016, 11, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Barrett, M.T.; Anderson, K.S.; Lenkiewicz, E.; Andreozzi, M.; Cunliffe, H.E.; Klassen, C.L.; Dueck, A.C.; McCullough, A.E.; Reddy, S.K.; Ramanathan, R.K.; et al. Genomic amplification of 9p24.1 targeting jak2, pd-l1, and pd-l2 is enriched in high-risk triple negative breast cancer. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 26483–26493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Chen, M.; Pockaj, B.; Andreozzi, M.; Barrett, M.T.; Krishna, S.; Eaton, S.; Niu, R.; Anderson, K.S. Jak2 and pd-l1 amplification enhance the dynamic expression of pd-l1 in triple-negative breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer 2018, 18, e1205–e1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Zou, J.; Wu, D.; Li, T.; Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Tan, S. Association of pd-l1 gene rs4143815 c>g polymorphism and human cancer susceptibility: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2019, 215, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Tao, L.H.; Zhou, X.R.; Li, F.C.; Chen, Q.; Meng, F.Y.; Mao, Y.; Li, R.; Hua, D.; Zhang, H.J.; Wang, W.P.; et al. A polymorphism in the promoter region of pd-l1 serves as a binding-site for sp1 and is associated with pd-l1 overexpression and increased occurrence of gastric cancer. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2017, 66, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Salmaninejad, A.; Khoramshahi, V.; Azani, A.; Soltaninejad, E.; Aslani, S.; Zamani, M.R.; Zal, M.; Nesaei, A.; Hosseini, S.M. Pd-1 and cancer: Molecular mechanisms and polymorphisms. Immunogenetics 2018, 70, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dang, C.V. Myc on the path to cancer. Cell 2012, 149, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Casey, S.C.; Baylot, V.; Felsher, D.W. Myc: Master regulator of immune privilege. Trends Immunol. 2017, 38, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Atsaves, V.; Tsesmetzis, N.; Chioureas, D.; Kis, L.; Leventaki, V.; Drakos, E.; Panaretakis, T.; Grander, D.; Medeiros, L.J.; Young, K.H.; et al. Pd-l1 is commonly expressed and transcriptionally regulated by stat3 and myc in alk-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma. Leukemia 2017, 31, 1633–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lastwika, K.J.; Wilson, W., 3rd; Li, Q.K.; Norris, J.; Xu, H.; Ghazarian, S.R.; Kitagawa, H.; Kawabata, S.; Taube, J.M.; Yao, S.; et al. Control of pd-l1 expression by oncogenic activation of the akt-mtor pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Lin, K.; Cheng, J.; Yang, T.; Li, Y.; Zhu, B. Egfr-tki down-regulates pd-l1 in egfr mutant nsclc through inhibiting nf-kappab. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 463, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Azuma, K.; Ota, K.; Kawahara, A.; Hattori, S.; Iwama, E.; Harada, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Takayama, K.; Takamori, S.; Kage, M.; et al. Association of pd-l1 overexpression with activating egfr mutations in surgically resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2014, 25, 1935–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Akbay, E.A.; Koyama, S.; Carretero, J.; Altabef, A.; Tchaicha, J.H.; Christensen, C.L.; Mikse, O.R.; Cherniack, A.D.; Beauchamp, E.M.; Pugh, T.J.; et al. Activation of the pd-1 pathway contributes to immune escape in egfr-driven lung tumors. Cancer Discov. 2013, 3, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Im, J.S.; Herrmann, A.C.; Bernatchez, C.; Haymaker, C.; Molldrem, J.J.; Hong, W.K.; Perez-Soler, R. Immune-modulation by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors: Implication on anti-tumor immunity in lung cancer. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Stutvoet, T.S.; Kol, A.; de Vries, E.G.; de Bruyn, M.; Fehrmann, R.S.; Terwisscha van Scheltinga, A.G.; de Jong, S. Mapk pathway activity plays a key role in pd-l1 expression of lung adenocarcinoma cells. J. Pathol. 2019, 249, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Yang, W.H.; Cha, J.H.; Xia, W.; Lee, H.H.; Chan, L.C.; Wang, Y.N.; Hsu, J.L.; Ren, G.; Hung, M.C. Juxtacrine signaling inhibits antitumor immunity by upregulating pd-l1 expression. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 3761–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Gowrishankar, K.; Gunatilake, D.; Gallagher, S.J.; Tiffen, J.; Rizos, H.; Hersey, P. Inducible but not constitutive expression of pd-l1 in human melanoma cells is dependent on activation of nf-kappab. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0123410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Vincent-Fabert, C.; Roland, L.; Zimber-Strobl, U.; Feuillard, J.; Faumont, N. Pre-clinical blocking of pd-l1 molecule, which expression is down regulated by nf-kappab, jak1/jak2 and btk inhibitors, induces regression of activated b-cell lymphoma. Cell Commun. Signal. 2019, 17, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Xiao, W.; Klement, J.D.; Lu, C.; Ibrahim, M.L.; Liu, K. Ifnar1 controls autocrine type i ifn regulation of pd-l1 expression in myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 264–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Yoon, H.K.; Kim, T.H.; Park, S.; Jung, H.; Quan, X.; Park, S.J.; Han, J.; Lee, A. Effect of anthracycline and taxane on the expression of programmed cell death ligand-1 and galectin-9 in triple-negative breast cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2018, 214, 1626–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zerdes, I.; Matikas, A.; Bergh, J.; Rassidakis, G.Z.; Foukakis, T. Genetic, transcriptional and post-translational regulation of the programmed death protein ligand 1 in cancer: Biology and clinical correlations. Oncogene 2018, 37, 4639–4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Wrangle, J.; Wang, W.; Koch, A.; Easwaran, H.; Mohammad, H.P.; Vendetti, F.; Vancriekinge, W.; Demeyer, T.; Du, Z.; Parsana, P.; et al. Alterations of immune response of non-small cell lung cancer with azacytidine. Oncotarget 2013, 4, 2067–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Yang, H.; Bueso-Ramos, C.; DiNardo, C.; Estecio, M.R.; Davanlou, M.; Geng, Q.R.; Fang, Z.; Nguyen, M.; Pierce, S.; Wei, Y.; et al. Expression of pd-l1, pd-l2, pd-1 and ctla4 in myelodysplastic syndromes is enhanced by treatment with hypomethylating agents. Leukemia 2014, 28, 1280–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Asgarova, A.; Asgarov, K.; Godet, Y.; Peixoto, P.; Nadaradjane, A.; Boyer-Guittaut, M.; Galaine, J.; Guenat, D.; Mougey, V.; Perrard, J.; et al. Pd-l1 expression is regulated by both DNA methylation and nf-kb during emt signaling in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Oncoimmunology 2018, 7, e1423170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Kataoka, K.; Shiraishi, Y.; Takeda, Y.; Sakata, S.; Matsumoto, M.; Nagano, S.; Maeda, T.; Nagata, Y.; Kitanaka, A.; Mizuno, S.; et al. Aberrant pd-l1 expression through 3'-utr disruption in multiple cancers. Nature 2016, 534, 402–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, W.; Sun, J.; Li, F.; Li, R.; Gu, Y.; Liu, C.; Yang, P.; Zhu, M.; Chen, L.; Tian, W.; et al. A frequent somatic mutation in cd274 3'-utr leads to protein over-expression in gastric cancer by disrupting mir-570 binding. Hum. Mutat. 2012, 33, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Peng, Y.; Croce, C.M. The role of micrornas in human cancer. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 2016, 1, 15004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Eichmuller, S.B.; Osen, W.; Mandelboim, O.; Seliger, B. Immune modulatory micrornas involved in tumor attack and tumor immune escape. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2017, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Fujita, Y.; Yagishita, S.; Hagiwara, K.; Yoshioka, Y.; Kosaka, N.; Takeshita, F.; Fujiwara, T.; Tsuta, K.; Nokihara, H.; Tamura, T.; et al. The clinical relevance of the mir-197/cks1b/stat3-mediated pd-l1 network in chemoresistant non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol. Ther. 2015, 23, 717–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Ahn, H.; Yang, J.M.; Kim, H.; Chung, J.H.; Ahn, S.H.; Jeong, W.J.; Paik, J.H. Clinicopathologic implications of the mir-197/pd-l1 axis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 66178–66194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. Nallasamy, P.; Chava, S.; Verma, S.S.; Mishra, S.; Gorantla, S.; Coulter, D.W.; Byrareddy, S.N.; Batra, S.K.; Gupta, S.C.; Challagundla, K.B. Pd-l1, inflammation, non-coding rnas, and neuroblastoma: Immuno-oncology perspective. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2018, 52, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Shang, A.; Wang, W.; Gu, C.; Chen, C.; Zeng, B.; Yang, Y.; Ji, P.; Sun, J.; Wu, J.; Lu, W.; et al. Long non-coding rna hottip enhances il-6 expression to potentiate immune escape of ovarian cancer cells by upregulating the expression of pd-l1 in neutrophils. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zhao, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Qi, Q. Lncrna snhg14/mir-5590-3p/zeb1 positive feedback loop promoted diffuse large b cell lymphoma progression and immune evasion through regulating pd-1/pd-l1 checkpoint. Cell Death Dis. 2019, 10, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Wei, S.; Wang, K.; Huang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, Z. Lncrna malat1 contributes to non-small cell lung cancer progression via modulating mir-200a-3p/programmed death-ligand 1 axis. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol. 2019, 33, 2058738419859699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Zhang, C.; Jiang, F.; Su, C.; Xie, P.; Xu, L. Upregulation of long noncoding rna snhg20 promotes cell growth and metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via modulating atm-jak-pd-l1 pathway. J. Cell Biochem. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Burr, M.L.; Sparbier, C.E.; Chan, Y.C.; Williamson, J.C.; Woods, K.; Beavis, P.A.; Lam, E.Y.N.; Henderson, M.A.; Bell, C.C.; Stolzenburg, S.; et al. Cmtm6 maintains the expression of pd-l1 and regulates anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2017, 549, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Horita, H.; Law, A.; Hong, S.; Middleton, K. Identifying regulatory posttranslational modifications of pd-l1: A focus on monoubiquitinaton. Neoplasia 2017, 19, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hsu, J.M.; Li, C.W.; Lai, Y.J.; Hung, M.C. Posttranslational modifications of pd-l1 and their applications in cancer therapy. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 6349–6353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Li, C.W.; Lim, S.O.; Xia, W.; Lee, H.H.; Chan, L.C.; Kuo, C.W.; Khoo, K.H.; Chang, S.S.; Cha, J.H.; Kim, T.; et al. Glycosylation and stabilization of programmed death ligand-1 suppresses t-cell activity. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Li, C.W.; Lim, S.O.; Chung, E.M.; Kim, Y.S.; Park, A.H.; Yao, J.; Cha, J.H.; Xia, W.; Chan, L.C.; Kim, T.; et al. Eradication of triple-negative breast cancer cells by targeting glycosylated pd-l1. Cancer Cell 2018, 33, 187–201 e110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Mezzadra, R.; Sun, C.; Jae, L.T.; Gomez-Eerland, R.; de Vries, E.; Wu, W.; Logtenberg, M.E.W.; Slagter, M.; Rozeman, E.A.; Hofland, I.; et al. Identification of cmtm6 and cmtm4 as pd-l1 protein regulators. Nature 2017, 549, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Zhang, J.; Bu, X.; Wang, H.; Zhu, Y.; Geng, Y.; Nihira, N.T.; Tan, Y.; Ci, Y.; Wu, F.; Dai, X.; et al. Cyclin d-cdk4 kinase destabilizes pd-l1 via cullin 3-spop to control cancer immune surveillance. Nature 2018, 553, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Sasaguri, M.; Ikeda, M.; Ideishi, M.; Arakawa, K. Identification of [hydroxyproline3]-bradykinin released from human plasma and plasma protein cohn’s fraction iv-4 by trypsin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1988, 157, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Akinleye, A.; Rasool, Z. Immune checkpoint inhibitors of pd-l1 as cancer therapeutics. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Kim, J.Y.; Lee, K.H.; Eisenhut, M.; van der Vliet, H.J.; Kronbichler, A.; Jeong, G.H.; Shin, J.I.; Gamerith, G. Efficacy of cancer immunotherapy: An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Cancers (Basel) 2019, 11, 1801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Santaniello, A.; Napolitano, F.; Servetto, A.; De Placido, P.; Silvestris, N.; Bianco, C.; Formisano, L.; Bianco, R. Tumour microenvironment and immune evasion in egfr addicted nsclc: Hurdles and possibilities. Cancers (Basel) 2019, 11, 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Kim, H.; Chung, J.H. Pd-l1 testing in non-small cell lung cancer: Past, present, and future. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2019, 53, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Seliger, B. Molecular mechanisms of hla class i-mediated immune evasion of human tumors and their role in resistance to immunotherapies. HLA 2016, 88, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zaretsky, J.M.; Garcia-Diaz, A.; Shin, D.S.; Escuin-Ordinas, H.; Hugo, W.; Hu-Lieskovan, S.; Torrejon, D.Y.; Abril-Rodriguez, G.; Sandoval, S.; Barthly, L.; et al. Mutations associated with acquired resistance to pd-1 blockade in melanoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Shin, D.S.; Zaretsky, J.M.; Escuin-Ordinas, H.; Garcia-Diaz, A.; Hu-Lieskovan, S.; Kalbasi, A.; Grasso, C.S.; Hugo, W.; Sandoval, S.; Torrejon, D.Y.; et al. Primary resistance to pd-1 blockade mediated by jak1/2 mutations. Cancer Discov. 2017, 7, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Kalbasi, A.; Ribas, A. Tumour-intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sade-Feldman, M.; Jiao, Y.J.; Chen, J.H.; Rooney, M.S.; Barzily-Rokni, M.; Eliane, J.P.; Bjorgaard, S.L.; Hammond, M.R.; Vitzthum, H.; Blackmon, S.M.; et al. Resistance to checkpoint blockade therapy through inactivation of antigen presentation. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wu, Y.; Xu, J.; Du, C.; Wu, Y.; Xia, D.; Lv, W.; Hu, J. The predictive value of tumor mutation burden on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Sabari, J.K.; Leonardi, G.C.; Shu, C.A.; Umeton, R.; Montecalvo, J.; Ni, A.; Chen, R.; Dienstag, J.; Mrad, C.; Bergagnini, I.; et al. Pd-l1 expression, tumor mutational burden, and response to immunotherapy in patients with met exon 14 altered lung cancers. Ann. Oncol. 2018, 29, 2085–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Distinct mechanisms regulating PD-L1 expression.
Table 1. Distinct mechanisms regulating PD-L1 expression.
copy number alterations/amplifications/translocation
transcription factors
oncogenic pathway activation
cytotoxic agents/chemotherapeutics
miRNAs and lncRNAs
posttranslational modifications

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Seliger, B. Basis of PD1/PD-L1 Therapies. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122168

AMA Style

Seliger B. Basis of PD1/PD-L1 Therapies. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8(12):2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122168

Chicago/Turabian Style

Seliger, Barbara. 2019. "Basis of PD1/PD-L1 Therapies" Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 12: 2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122168

APA Style

Seliger, B. (2019). Basis of PD1/PD-L1 Therapies. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(12), 2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8122168

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop