Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Association between the Risk of Central Retinal Artery Occlusion and the Concentration of Environmental Air Pollutants
Next Article in Special Issue
Pretransplant Cardiac Evaluation Using Novel Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Differential Efficacy of Neurofeedback in Children with ADHD Presentations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 8
Issue 2
10.3390/jcm8020207
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells: The Future Is Now

by
Wassim Mchayleh
1,
Prabhjot Bedi
2,
Rajesh Sehgal
2 and
Melhem Solh
1,3,*
1
Department of Medicine, Northside Hospital Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA
2
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Center East, Monroeville, PA 15146, USA
3
Blood and Marrow Transplant, Acute Leukemia and Immunotherapy Program, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA 30342, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(2), 207; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020207
Submission received: 15 January 2019 / Revised: 29 January 2019 / Accepted: 31 January 2019 / Published: 7 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: A New Era)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The immune system acting via cancer immune-surveillance is considered a potential target for improving outcomes among some malignancies. The ability to harness immune cells, engineer them and educate them to target cancer cells has changed the paradigm for treating non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown remarkable anti-tumor activity against refractory B cell malignancies. Ongoing research aims to expand the scope of this adoptive cell therapy, understanding mechanisms of resistance and reducing toxicity. In this review, we will discuss the current scope of CAR T-cell therapy and ongoing future applications.

1. Introduction

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy ushers in a new dawn in the age of cancer immunotherapy. The ability of genetic engineering to alter the genome and induce specificity of T-cells against cancer cells in the form of chimeric antigen receptor is a revolutionary step in the rapidly evolving cancer treatment. It is a form of adoptive cell transfer (ACT). Initial studies using these cells have been promising [1]. Like other cancer therapies it is not sans the challenges but for sure is poised to provide clinicians with another resource in their armamentarium presently consisting of but not limited to surgery, chemotherapy, radiation and immuno-oncology agents like antibodies, cytokines, oncolytic viruses, bispecific molecules and cellular therapies [2]. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration “FDA” approval of chimeric antigen receptor “CAR-T” cell therapy for relapsed refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic lymphoma and for B cell NHL (Diffuse large B cell lymphoma) is encouraging and underscores the need for continued engagement in developing this novel therapy.

2. Structure and Mechanism of Action

The inherent innate and acquired anti-tumor immunity exists in body but is not as effective to fully contain the target resulting tumor overpowering it. However, this concept became the basis of modern-day immuno-oncology including adoptive cell therapy (ACT) which involves collecting and using immune cells to treat cancer. CAR-T cell therapy is a form of adoptive cell therapy which has recently gained attention due to success in clinical trials and FDA approval [1,3,4,5]. Chimeric antigen receptor—T cells or CAR T-cells are genetically engineered T cells expressing CARs on their surface. CARs are modified surface receptors that graft specificity to T-cells against a pre-identified target antigen being expressed on tumor cells. CD19 CAR-T cells express CARs targeted against CD19 which is expressed on normal B-cells as well as B-cell leukemias and lymphomas.
The prototypical T cell receptor consists of antigen-specific α and β chains linked with CD3 complex (ε, δ, γ and ζ chains). It identifies the target antigen presented in association with major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) alternatively has an extracellular domain consisting of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) recognizing a specific tumor antigen and is joined to a transmembrane domain which in turn is linked to signaling unit CD3ζ and costimulatory units CD28 or 4-1BB. This complex constitutes the intracellular domain [6,7]. CAR T-cells are able to identify specific tumor antigen-independent of the MHC complex.
The first generation of CARs contained only CD3ζ as a signaling molecule and even though the T cells expressing these CARs killed the target cells, they did not proliferate readily and failed clinical trials [8,9]. This barrier has been overcome by the development of second and third generation CARs (Figure 1). These have intracellular domain consisting of costimulatory molecules CD28 or 4-1BB linked in tandem with CD3ζ. The activating signal is provided by CD3ζ. The costimulatory molecules enhanced cytokine production, proliferation and survivability [10]. These have intracellular domain consisting of 1 or 2 additional costimulatory molecules such as CD28, 4-1BB, OX40 or CD27 linked in tandem with CD3ζ. The activating signal is provided by CD3ζ. The costimulatory molecules enhanced cytokine production, proliferation and survivability [9]. The fourth generation “Armored CAR T-cells” have now been developed in a bid to overcome inhibitory tumor microenvironment, especially in solid malignancies. Armored CARs capable of secreting cytokines as IL-2, IL-12 transcribed from an independent gene incorporated into and transduced by the CAR vector in addition to typical CAR functionality [11,12]. IL-12 secreting anti-MUC-16ecto antigen CARs against ovarian cancer cells have demonstrated success in murine models [13].
CAR T-cell therapy involves extracting a patient′s normal T-cells via leukapheresis, selection, activation, transduction to express CARs using lentiviral or retroviral vectors, expansion of transduced cells and infusion of the final product back to the patient. After the CAR T-cells are infused back into the patient, the engineered cells proliferate, recognize and kill tumor cells bearing the specific antigen the CAR is directed against. Most of the current clinical trials have been with anti-CD19 CAR T-cells which are directed against CD19 antigen [14,15]. Lymphodepleting chemotherapy is administered prior to CAR T-cell. It results in endogenous cytokine production stimulating CAR T-cells expansion and proliferation [16,17].
As B-cells express molecules like CD19, CD20 and CD22 which are specific to their lineage and not expressed on other body cells, the tumors arising from them became the target of interest for development for CAR T-cells. CD19 was chosen as one of the first targets because of its greater expression relative to other antigens [6]. Anti CD19 CAR T-cells are also the most widely studied amongst others in current clinical trials.

3. FDA Approved Indications

There have been 3 recent US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals for using anti CD19 CAR T-cells in B-Cell malignancies because of success demonstrated in clinical trials [1,4,5].
Tisagenlecleucel (KYMRIAH) was approved for refractory or relapsed B-cell precursor ALL in children and young adults <25 years old in August 2017 and relapsed or refractory (RR) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, high-grade B-cell lymphoma and DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma in May 2018 [18]. Tisagenlecleucel is CD19 directed 4-1BB/CD3ζ CAR T-cell therapy. It consists of autologous T-cells genetically modified to express anti-CD19 scFv linked to signaling domains 4-1BB and CD3ζ.
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (YESCARTA) is CD19 directed CD28/CD3ζ CAR T-cell therapy which was approved for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma and DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma in October 2017 [19].

4. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Chemotherapy remains the first line of treatment for childhood and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Because of an outstanding advancement in the treatment of childhood disease, the 5-year survival rate is approaching 90% in some countries [20]. On the other hand, the majority of adults with the disease will relapse after initial remission and a significant proportion (25%) will have resistant disease resulting in high overall mortality [21].
CD19 CAR T-cell therapy was studied in a number of single-center studies for R/R ALL which showed promising results as evidenced by achievement of complete remission (CR) in 70%–97% of patients [22,23,24,25,26]. The successful results of ELIANA (Determine Efficacy and Safety of CTL019 in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory B-cell ALL) multicenter trial using CD19 scFv/4-1BB/CD3ζ construct of CAR T-cells formed the basis of first FDA approval of CAR T-cell therapy. Out of 107 patients screened, 92 were enrolled and 75 received the CAR T-cell treatment. The median marrow blast percentage was 74% (range 5 to 99) and 61% of patients had undergone previous allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. The overall remission was attained in 81% with 60% attaining a complete remission and 21% achieving a complete remission without hematologic recovery. However, on an intention to treat analysis of the full enrolled population (n = 92), the overall remission rate was 66%. Among patients with complete remission, the relapse-free survival at 12 months was 59% (95% CI, 41 to 73) [1].
A single center report from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center showed that among 53 adults who received 19-28z CAR T cells, complete remission (CR) was obtained in 83% of the patients with a median event-free survival of 6.1 months and overall survival of 20.1 months. Survival rates were significantly better for patients with low disease burden. It is noteworthy in this study as in the ELIANA trial, 83 patients were enrolled in the study but only 53 patients received the infusion of CAR-T cells [27]. These studies show that although CAR T cell therapy is effective in ALL, it is limited by the ability to get patients to this treatment in a timely fashion given the highly proliferative nature of relapsed and refractory ALL as well as logistical issues encompassing CAR T-cell manufacturing and administration.
Tisagenlecleucel (KYMRIAH) is currently approved for refractory or relapsed B-cell precursor ALL in children and young adults of age <25. The current FDA approved indications are summarized in Table 1.

5. Non-Hodgkin′s Lymphoma (NHL)

As CD19 is also expressed in B-cell NHL′s, CD19 CAR T-cells have been studied in single and multicenter studies for the treatment of some forms of R/R B-cell NHL like follicular lymphoma, transformed follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma with encouraging results [4,5,28].
As a result of success in these multicenter trials, Axicabtagene ciloleucel (YESCARTA) and Tisagenlecleucel (KYMRIAH) were approved by FDA for (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma and (RR) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, high-grade B-cell lymphoma and DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma respectively. The trial involving Axicabtagene ciloleucel enrolled 111 patients out of which 101 received the treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete remission (CR) criteria were met by 82% and 58% respectively at a median of 15.4 months follow-up [4]. The ZUMA-1 trial, a multicenter single-arm registration trial at 22 sites in the USA and Israel, 119 patients with histologically confirmed large B-cell lymphoma including DLBCL, mediastinal B-cell lymphoma and transformed follicular lymphoma were enrolled and 108 received Axicabtagene ciloleucel at a target dose of 2 × 10 (6) CAR T cells per KG after a lymphodepleting chemotherapy of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. After a median follow up of 27.1 months, 101 assessable patients were included and 84 (83%) had an objective response and 59 (58%) had a complete response. The median duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival of 11, 6 and >27 months, respectively. Similarly, the JULIET study assessed 93 patients with relapsed refractory DLBCL who received Tisagenlecleucel with a median follow up time of 14 months. The best overall response rate was 52% with 40% achieving a CR. At 12 months after the initial response, the rate of relapse-free survival was estimated to be 65% (79% among patients with a complete response) [5]. Both studies establish CAR T cell therapy to be an effective treatment for relapse refractory lymphoma with some patients achieving long sustainable responses.

6. Toxicity

The CAR T-cell like other cancer therapies is not free of undesirable effects. Even though this therapy provides a potential treatment modality where none existed, it has quite a few worrisome and potentially fatal toxicities.
Several mechanisms play a role in orchestrating the detrimental effects of CAR T-cell infusion. It might be an “on target” effect resulting from intense cytokine release from infused CAR T-cells or damage inflicted to normal tissue by CAR T-cells as a result of that tissue expressing either target antigen or a protein which cross-reacts with the CAR. Allergic reactions and Tumor lysis syndrome have also been reported [29,30,31].
The two frequently reported specific toxicities to include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity [32].
CRS is a common and concerning toxicity of CAR-T cell therapy. The onset is usually within the first week of infusion. After infusion, the T-cells undergo activation, proliferation and mount a vigorous cytokine response. The cytokines implicated in CRS are produced from CAR T-cells as well as the other immune cells activated by the cytokines released from the CAR T-cells. This results in an exuberant systemic inflammatory response manifesting as a noninfectious flulike illness. CRS can potentially affect all organ systems but more commonly characterized by fevers, hypotension, tachycardia, respiratory and renal insufficiency [33]. High tumor burden, a higher concentration of CD19 cells in the bone marrow, pretreatment thrombocytopenia and high CAR T-cell were found to be risk factors for CRS in a study of 133 patients with R/R CD19+ B-cell malignancies who received lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by CD19 CAR T-cells [34]. CRS is characterized by high levels of cytokines like interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ). Tocilizumab (Actemra) is an IL-6 antagonist which is effective in treating CRS and has been approved by FDA [23,30]. Glucocorticoids are indicated if there is a lack of rapid response to Tocilizumab [6]. Supportive care should be provided in an ICU or floor setting depending on the grade of severity.
Neurotoxicity has been reported by multiple research groups testing CD19 CAR T-cells [23,35]. Commonly reported symptoms to include headaches, delirium, aphasia, focal neurological deficits, seizures and loss of consciousness. The pathophysiology of neurological symptoms has not been elucidated yet but it is usually fully reversible barring few cases of fatal cerebral hemorrhage or edema [32,36].
B-cell aplasia is another frequently reported adverse effect [37]. It results from CD19 CAR T-cells targeting normal non-malignant CD19+ B-cells resulting in their elimination. This, in turn, leads to hypogammaglobinemia predisposing patients to opportunistic infections. Immunoglobulin levels are monitored after infusion of CAR T-cells and hypogammaglobinemia is treated with IVIG infusions. It is expected collateral damage of the therapy and B-cells recover as the number of CAR T-cells decline.
As is the case with other immunomodulation therapies, treatment with CAR T-cell can predispose to infections. Patients receiving CAR T-cells are frequently lymphopenia and neutropenia making them susceptible to opportunistic infections. There should be a low suspicion to suspect infection especially in patients who develop CRS as clinical features of both frequently overlap.
Because of the risk of serious toxicities, FDA approval of CAR T-cells was granted contingent with a Risk evaluation and mitigation strategy which requires the physicians and hospital staff where the drug is administered to be trained in the management of adverse effects.

7. Mechanisms of Resistance

Several mechanisms of development of resistance to CAR therapy have been described in the literature. These include anti-idiotype antibodies, tumor antigen escape, antigenic target gene mutation, insertion of CAR into leukemia cells [38,39,40,41].
The scFvs used for manufacturing CARs are sourced from murine monoclonal antibodies and hence are at risk for inducing production of anti-idiotype and anti-mouse antibodies which are inhibitory to CAR T-cell action rendering the therapy ineffective [38]. Single antigenic domain scFvs which have smaller ectodomain and hence lesser immunogenicity have been developed to overcome this limitation, however, the downside is weaker affinity and lesser specificity [42]. Another approach is to use human scFvs which will eliminate the formation of anti-mouse antibodies but nevertheless, the possibility of anti-idiotypic antibody response persists. The construct of Anti-HER2, EphA2 and mesothelin CARs reflect this approach [43,44,45].
Downregulation or loss of target antigen expression on the leukemia cells is a commonly described mechanism resulting in relapse [39]. The significant amount of data in this regard comes from the studies involving the use of anti-CD19 CARs in pediatric ALL patients. Antigen escape and lineage switch are two different means of CD19 loss described in the literature [46]. Whereas in case of antigen escape relapse after remission occurs with the phenotypically similar disease but CD19- cells, lineage switch results on phenotypically different but genetically related malignancy, for example, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [39]. The immune pressure from CD19 CAR T-cells can result in the selection of exon 2 splice variants resulting in loss CD19 epitope expression [47]. However, further investigations into this have shown that anti-CD19 CARs, in fact, bind exon 4 and loss of CD19 expression in exon 2 variant results from deranged CD19 surface localization [48,49]. Designing CARs targeting more than one antigen can potentially aid in overcoming antigen escape.
The immune strain resulting from CD19 CAR T-cells has been speculated to induce post-therapy mutations resulting in lack of CD19 on mutated B-ALL tumor cells as evidenced by the work of Orlando et al. involving patients with CD19-negative disease relapse [50].
Most recently, there was a case report where a CAR gene was inadvertently incorporated into a leukemic B-cell during T-cell construction. This, in turn, resulted in a product which would bind to CD19 epitome on the surface of the leukemic cell and hence mask it from recognition by the therapeutic T-cells. The patient exhibited florid relapse as evidenced by >90% infiltration of marrow by CD10+CD19- leukemic cells as well as blasts in circulation. Further investigation revealed these were, in fact, CAR-transduced B-cells. The patient was treated with salvage chemotherapy and immunotherapy but eventually passed away [41].

8. Future indications and Solid Tumors

The backbone of CAR T-cell therapy is the identification of target antigen and the development of CAR T-cell construct against that antigen. An ideal antigen would be a one with higher and dense expression in the target tissue and not expressed on normal cells. This would augment the efficiency of the therapy and minimize collateral damage to normal tissue. This underlying concept forms the basis of the present success of CD19 directed therapy as CD19 is B-cell lineage specific antigen. B-cell aplasia noted as one of the adverse effects is a result of collateral damage by virtue of CD19 expression on normal B-cells.
A significant hurdle and challenge in extrapolating CAR T-cell to other hematological cancers and potentially solid cancers will be the identification of suitable target antigens. This is exemplified by the challenges encountered in the development of CAR T-cells against T cell malignancies as shared antigens make the differentiation between the malignant, normal and therapeutic T-cells onerous resulting in T-cell aplasia and mutual killing of CAR T-cells (fratricide) as unintended consequences [51]. Some other malignancies which are presently being investigated and have the potential for success in future are CLL, Multiple myelomas, Hodgkin lymphoma, anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, AML. Each one has their own specific challenges, however, the perennial and swift developments in genetic engineering have the potential to overcome them sooner or later.
Even though CAR T-cell therapy has shown encouraging results in some hematological cancers as mentioned above, its application to solid tumors is fraught with challenges including but not limited to identification of a precise tumor-specific antigen, immunosuppressive nature of tumor microenvironment [52], limited and poor persistence after infusion [53]. Multiple trials using CAR T-cells in solid malignancies have demonstrated severe toxicities as even minimal expression of target antigen in normal host tissues becomes a victim of the vigorous CAR T-cells directed against that antigen [54]. Some examples are: CAR T-cells directed against carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) in renal cell cancer resulted in hepatotoxicity due to the expression of CAIX on bile duct epithelium [55,56], ERBB2 CAR T-cells used in metastatic colorectal cancer caused pulmonary toxicity due to antigen expression on lung epithelium along with multi-organ failure and ultimate demise of patient. The trial using CEACAM5-CAR T-cells for gastrointestinal tumors was closed prematurely due to poor efficacy and toxicities [53]. Even though some tumor-specific antigens have been identified and trials involving CAR T-cells directed against these showed a better safety profile but clinical efficacy was limited. HER2-based CAR used for sarcoma is one such example which in trial displayed a favorable safety profile but treatment outcome no better than a stable disease [57]. One ray of light has been the success with glioblastoma. CAR T cells developed against IL-13Rα were used via local intracranial infusions for recurrent glioblastoma in one patient with intracranial and spinal tumors following which regression of all intracranial and spinal tumors was exhibited and the response continued for 7.5 months [58].
Despite the early success, this field is still in its stages of inception and it might be a while before it sees the light of the day in terms of establishing itself as conventional therapy. The length of time needed to get patients ready for infusion associated with the big price tag with therapy itself and an equally sizeable healthcare costs emanating from its administration are significant limiting factors to providing CAR T-cell therapy on a wide range. One of the areas of current research involving adoptive cell therapy is the development of allogeneic T-cells that can serve as universal off the shelf CAR T-cells facilitating more widespread clinical use. This has been made feasible by genome editing techniques like ZFN (zinc finger nuclease), TALEN (transcription activator-like effector nuclease) and CRISPR-Cas9 [59]. UCART19 is one such example. It has been developed with lentiviral transduction and as well as TALEN mediated gene editing of T cell receptor α chain and CD52 gene loci. Successful molecular remission was demonstrated in two infants with relapsed refractory CD19+ B cell ALL with a single dose of UCART19 cells infused after administering lymphodepleting chemotherapy and anti-CD52 serotherapy. The investigators in this trial used this strategy as a bridge to stem cell transplantation [60]. FT819 is a human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived CAR-T cell product which exhibited an efficient cytotoxic response in pre-clinical in vitro studies [61]. Further research into faster manufacturing and cell expansion, utilizing off the shelf ready products with lower toxicity will help make CAR T-cell therapy more available and affordable.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed into writing this manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Maude, S.L.; Laetsch, T.W.; Buechner, J.; Rives, S.; Boyer, M.; Bittencourt, H.; Bader, P.; Verneris, M.R.; Stefanski, H.E.; Myers, G.D.; et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hoos, A. Development of immuno-oncology drugs - from CTLA4 to PD1 to the next generations. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 15, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Swann, J.B.; Smyth, M.J. Immune surveillance of tumors. J. Clin. Invest. 2007, 117, 1137–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Neelapu, S.S.; Locke, F.L.; Bartlett, N.L.; Lekakis, L.J.; Miklos, D.B.; Jacobson, C.A.; Braunschweig, I.; Oluwole, O.O.; Siddiqi, T.; Lin, Y.; et al. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2531–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schuster, S.J.; Bishop, M.R.; Tam, C.S.; Waller, E.K.; Borchmann, P.; McGuirk, J.P.; Jaeger, U.; Jaglowski, S.; Andreadis, C.; Westin, J.R.; et al. Primary Analysis of Juliet: A Global, Pivotal, Phase 2 Trial of CTL019 in Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Blood 2017, 130, 577. [Google Scholar]
  6. June, C.H.; Sadelain, M. Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Salter, A.I.; Pont, M.J.; Riddell, S.R. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells: CD19 and the road beyond. Blood 2018, 131, 2621–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Brocker, T. Chimeric Fv-zeta or Fv-epsilon receptors are not sufficient to induce activation or cytokine production in peripheral T cells. Blood 2000, 96, 1999–2001. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jensen, M.C.; Popplewell, L.; Cooper, L.J.; DiGiusto, D.; Kalos, M.; Ostberg, J.R.; Forman, S.J. Antitransgene rejection responses contribute to attenuated persistence of adoptively transferred CD20/CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor redirected T cells in humans. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010, 16, 1245–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Krause, A.; Guo, H.F.; Latouche, J.B.; Tan, C.; Cheung, N.K.; Sadelain, M. Antigen-dependent CD28 signaling selectively enhances survival and proliferation in genetically modified activated human primary T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 1998, 188, 619–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pegram, H.J.; Park, J.H.; Brentjens, R.J. CD28z CARs and armored CARs. Cancer J. 2014, 20, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yeku, O.O.; Brentjens, R.J. Armored CAR T-cells: Utilizing cytokines and pro-inflammatory ligands to enhance CAR T-cell anti-tumour efficacy. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016, 44, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Koneru, M.; Purdon, T.J.; Spriggs, D.; Koneru, S.; Brentjens, R.J. IL-12 secreting tumor-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells eradicate ovarian tumors in vivo. Oncoimmunology 2015, 4, e994446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Roberts, Z.J.; Better, M.; Bot, A.; Roberts, M.R.; Ribas, A. Axicabtagene ciloleucel, a first-in-class CAR T cell therapy for aggressive NHL. Leuk. Lymphoma 2018, 59, 1785–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, C.; Liu, J.; Zhong, J.F.; Zhang, X. Engineering CAR-T cells. Biomark Res. 2017, 5, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bot, A.; Rossi, J.M.; Jiang, Y.; Navale, L.; Shen, Y.-W.; Sherman, M.; Mardiros, A.; Yoder, S.C.; Go, W.Y.; Rosenberg, S.A.; et al. Cyclophosphamide and Fludarabine Conditioning Chemotherapy Induces a Key Homeostatic Cytokine Profile in Patients Prior to CAR T Cell Therapy. Blood 2015, 126, 4426. [Google Scholar]
  17. Turtle, C.J.; Berger, C.; Sommermeyer, D.; Hanafi, L.-A.; Pender, B.; Robinson, E.M.; Melville, K.; Budiarto, T.M.; Steevens, N.N.; Chaney, C.; et al. Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cell Therapy for B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide Lymphodepletion Improves In Vivo Expansion and Persistence of CAR-T Cells and Clinical Outcomes. Blood 2015, 126, 184. [Google Scholar]
  18. US Food and Drug Administration. Approved Products-KYMRIAH (Tisagenlecleucel) [Internet]. 2018. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/CellularGeneTherapyProducts/ApprovedProducts/ucm573706.htm (accessed on 29 January 2019).
  19. US Food and Drug Administration. Approved Products-YESCARTA (Axicabtagene Ciloleucel) [Internet]. 2018. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/CellularGeneTherapyProducts/ApprovedProducts/ucm581222.htm (accessed on 29 January 2019).
  20. Pui, C.-H.; Yang, J.J.; Hunger, S.P.; Pieters, R.; Schrappe, M.; Biondi, A.; Vora, A.; Baruchel, A.; Silverman, L.B.; Schmiegelow, K.; et al. Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Progress Through Collaboration. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 2938–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fielding, A.K.; Richards, S.M.; Chopra, R.; Lazarus, H.M.; Litzow, M.R.; Buck, G.; Durrant, I.J.; Luger, S.M.; Marks, D.I.; Franklin, I.M.; et al. Outcome of 609 adults after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); an MRC UKALL12/ECOG 2993 study. Blood 2007, 109, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gardner, R.A.; Finney, O.; Annesley, C.; Brakke, H.; Summers, C.; Leger, K.; Bleakley, M.; Brown, C.; Mgebroff, S.; Spratt, K.; et al. Intent to treat leukemia remission by CD19CAR T cells of defined formulation and dose in children and young adults. Blood 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Davila, M.L.; Riviere, I.; Wang, X.; Bartido, S.; Park, J.; Curran, K.; Chung, S.S.; Stefanski, J.; Borquez-Ojeda, O.; Olszewska, M.; et al. Efficacy and toxicity management of 19-28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014, 6, 224ra25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Maude, S.L.; Frey, N.; Shaw, P.A.; Aplenc, R.; Barrett, D.M.; Bunin, N.J.; Chew, A.; Gonzalez, V.E.; Zheng, Z.; Lacey, S.F.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1507–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, D.W.; Kochenderfer, J.N.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; Cui, Y.K.; Delbrook, C.; Feldman, S.A.; Fry, T.J.; Orentas, R.; Sabatino, M.; Shah, N.N.; et al. T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: A phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet 2015, 385, 517–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Turtle, C.J.; Hanafi, L.-A.; Berger, C.; Gooley, T.A.; Cherian, S.; Hudecek, M.; Sommermeyer, D.; Melville, K.; Pender, B.; Budiarto, T.M.; et al. CD19 CAR–T cells of defined CD4+:CD8+ composition in adult B cell ALL patients. J. Clin. Invest. 2016, 126, 2123–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Park, J.H.; Rivière, I.; Gonen, M.; Wang, X.; Sénéchal, B.; Curran, K.J.; Sauter, C.; Wang, Y.; Santomasso, B.; Mead, E.; et al. Long-Term Follow-up of CD19 CAR Therapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kochenderfer, J.N.; Somerville, R.P.T.; Lu, T.; Shi, V.; Bot, A.; Rossi, J.; Xue, A.; Goff, S.L.; Yang, J.C.; Sherry, R.M.; et al. Lymphoma Remissions Caused by Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Are Associated With High Serum Interleukin-15 Levels. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35, 1803–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Maus, M.V.; Haas, A.R.; Beatty, G.L.; Albelda, S.M.; Levine, B.L.; Liu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Kalos, M.; June, C.H. T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors can cause anaphylaxis in humans. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013, 1, 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Grupp, S.A.; Kalos, M.; Barrett, D.; Aplenc, R.; Porter, D.L.; Rheingold, S.R.; Teachey, D.T.; Chew, A.; Hauck, B.; Wright, J.F.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1509–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kochenderfer, J.N.; Dudley, M.E.; Carpenter, R.O.; Kassim, S.H.; Rose, J.J.; Telford, W.G.; Hakim, F.T.; Halverson, D.C.; Fowler, D.H.; Hardy, N.M.; et al. Donor-derived CD19-targeted T cells cause regression of malignancy persisting after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2013, 122, 4129–4139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Neelapu, S.S.; Tummala, S.; Kebriaei, P.; Wierda, W.; Gutierrez, C.; Locke, F.L.; Komanduri, K.V.; Lin, Y.; Jain, N.; Daver, N.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy-assessment and management of toxicities. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Brudno, J.N.; Kochenderfer, J.N. Toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor T cells: Recognition and management. Blood 2016, 127, 3321–3330. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hay, K.A.; Hanafi, L.-A.; Li, D.; Gust, J.; Liles, W.C.; Wurfel, M.M.; López, J.A.; Chen, J.; Chung, D.; Harju-Baker, S.; et al. Kinetics and biomarkers of severe cytokine release syndrome after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell therapy. Blood 2017, 130, 2295–2306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Turtle, C.J.; Hanafi, L.A.; Berger, C. Immunotherapy of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with a defined ratio of CD8+ and CD4+ CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 355ra116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gust, J.; Hay, K.A.; Hanafi, L.-A.; Li, D.; Myerson, D.; Gonzalez-Cuyar, L.F.; Yeung, C.; Conrad Liles, W.; Wurfel, M.; Lopez, J.A.; et al. Endothelial Activation and Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption in Neurotoxicity after Adoptive Immunotherapy with CD19 CAR-T Cells. Cancer Discov. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tasian,, S.K.; Gardner, R.A. CD19-redirected chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells: A promising immunotherapy for children and adults with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Ther. Adv. Hematol. 2015, 6, 228–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Dotti, G.; Gottschalk, S.; Savoldo, B.; Brenner, M.K. Design and development of therapies using chimeric antigen receptor-expressing T cells. Immunol. Rev. 2014, 257, 107–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Majzner, R.G.; Mackall, C.L. Tumor Antigen Escape from CAR T-cell Therapy. Cancer Discov. 2018, 8, 1219–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Rafiq, S.; Brentjens, R.J. Tumors evading CARs-the chase is on. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1492–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ruella, M.; Xu, J.; Barrett, D.M.; Fraietta, J.A.; Reich, T.J.; Ambrose, D.E.; Klichinsky, M.; Shestova, O.; Patel, P.R.; Kulikovskaya, I.; et al. Induction of resistance to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy by transduction of a single leukemic B cell. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1499–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sharifzadeh, Z.; Rahbarizadeh, F.; Shokrgozar, M.A.; Ahmadvand, D.; Mahboudi, F.; Jamnani, F.R.; Moghimi, S.M. Genetically engineered T cells bearing chimeric nanoconstructed receptors harboring TAG-72-specific camelid single domain antibodies as targeting agents. Cancer Lett. 2013, 334, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ahmed, N.; Ratnayake, M.; Savoldo, B.; Perlaky, L.; Dotti, G.; Wels, W.S.; Bhattacharjee, M.B.; Gilbertson, R.J.; Shine, H.D.; Weiss, H.L.; et al. Regression of experimental medulloblastoma following transfer of HER2-specific T cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 5957–5964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chow, K.K.H.; Naik, S.; Kakarla, S.; Brawley, V.S.; Shaffer, D.R.; Yi, Z.; Rainusso, N.; Wu, M.-F.; Liu, H.; Kew, Y.; et al. T cells redirected to EphA2 for the immunotherapy of glioblastoma. Mol. Ther. 2013, 21, 629–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lanitis, E.; Poussin, M.; Hagemann, I.S.; Coukos, G.; Sandaltzopoulos, R.; Scholler, N.; Powell, D.J., Jr. Redirected antitumor activity of primary human lymphocytes transduced with a fully human anti-mesothelin chimeric receptor. Mol. Ther. 2012, 20, 633–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Majzner, R.G.; Heitzeneder, S.; Mackall, C.L. Harnessing the Immunotherapy Revolution for the Treatment of Childhood Cancers. Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 476–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Sotillo, E.; Barrett, D.M.; Black, K.L.; Bagashev, A.; Oldridge, D.; Wu, G.; Sussman, R.; Lanauze, C.; Ruella, M.; Gazzara, M.R.; et al. Convergence of Acquired Mutations and Alternative Splicing of CD19 Enables Resistance to CART-19 Immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2015, 5, 1282–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Sommermeyer, D.; Hill, T.; Shamah, S.M.; Salter, A.I.; Chen, Y.; Mohler, K.M.; Riddell, S.R. Fully human CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptors for T-cell therapy. Leukemia 2017, 31, 2191–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bagashev, A.; Sotillo, E.; Tang, C.-H.A.; Black, K.L.; Perazzelli, J.; Seeholzer, S.H.; Argon, Y.; Barrett, D.M.; Grupp, S.A.; Hu, C.-C.A.; et al. CD19 alterations emerging after CD19-directed immunotherapy cause retention of the misfolded protein in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2018, 38, e00383-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Orlando, E.J.; Han, X.; Tribouley, C.; Wood, P.A.; Leary, R.J.; Riester, M.; Levine, J.E.; Qayed, M.; Grupp, S.A.; Boyer, M.; et al. Genetic mechanisms of target antigen loss in CAR19 therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1504–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alcantara, M.; Tesio, M.; June, C.H.; Houot, R. CAR T-cells for T-cell malignancies: Challenges in distinguishing between therapeutic, normal and neoplastic T-cells. Leukemia 2018, 32, 2307–2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Scarfò, I.; Maus, M.V. Current approaches to increase CAR T cell potency in solid tumors: Targeting the tumor microenvironment. J. Immunother Cancer 2017, 5, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thistlethwaite, F.C.; Gilham, D.E.; Guest, R.D.; Rothwell, D.G.; Pillai, M.; Burt, D.J.; Byatte, A.J.; Kirillova, N.; Valle, J.W.; Sharma, S.K.; et al. The clinical efficacy of first-generation carcinoembryonic antigen (CEACAM5)-specific CAR T cells is limited by poor persistence and transient pre-conditioning-dependent respiratory toxicity. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2017, 66, 1425–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bonifant, C.L.; Jackson, H.J.; Brentjens, R.J.; Curran, K.J. Toxicity and management in CAR T-cell therapy. Mol. Ther Oncolytics 2016, 3, 16011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lamers, C.H.J.; Sleijfer, S.; Vulto, A.G.; Kruit, W.H.J.; Kliffen, M.; Debets, R.; Gratama, J.W.; Stoter, G.; Oosterwijk, E. Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with autologous T-lymphocytes genetically retargeted against carbonic anhydrase IX: First clinical experience. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, e20–e22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lamers, C.H.; Sleijfer, S.; van Steenbergen, S.; van Elzakker, P.; van Krimpen, B.; Groot, C.; Vulto, A.; den Bakker, M.; Oosterwijk, E.; Debets, R.; et al. Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with CAIX CAR-engineered T cells: Clinical evaluation and management of on-target toxicity. Mol. Ther. 2013, 21, 904–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nemunaitis, J.; Manning, L. Faculty of 1000 Evaluation for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells for the Immunotherapy of HER2-Positive Sarcoma; F1000-Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  58. Brown, C.E.; Alizadeh, D.; Starr, R.; Weng, L.; Wagner, J.R.; Naranjo, A.; Ostberg, J.R.; Blanchard, M.S.; Kilpatrick, J.; Simpson, J.; et al. Regression of Glioblastoma after Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 2561–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhao, J.; Lin, Q.; Song, Y.; Liu, D. Universal CARs, universal T cells and universal CAR T cells. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 11, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Qasim, W.; Zhan, H.; Samarasinghe, S.; Adams, S.; Amrolia, P.; Stafford, S.; Butler, K.; Rivat, C.; Wright, G.; Somana, K.; et al. Molecular remission of infant B-ALL after infusion of universal TALEN gene-edited CAR T cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaaj2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Clarke, R.L.; van der Stegen, S.; Lee, T.; Mansilla-Soto, J.; Chang, C.-W.; Sasaki, J.; Husain, M.; Peralta, E.; Hardy, I.; Ortiz, E.; et al. Abstract LB-108: Generation of off-the-shelf TCR-less CAR-targeted cytotoxic T cells from renewable pluripotent cells for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2018, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 08 00207 g001 550
Figure 1. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) structure and generations.
Figure 1. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) structure and generations.
Jcm 08 00207 g001
Table
Table 1. Approved U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Indications for Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-Cell) Therapy.
Table 1. Approved U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Indications for Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T-Cell) Therapy.
CAR T-Cell ProductCAR ConstructFDA Approved Indications
Tisagenlecleucel (KYMRIAH)CD19scFv/4-1BB/CD3ζ• B-Cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) that is refractory or in the second relapse in patients up to age 25 years [18]
• Adult patients with (r/r) large B-Cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, high-grade B-cell lymphoma and DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma [18].
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (YESCARTA)CD19scFv/CD28/CD3ζ• Adult patients with (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy, DLBCL not otherwise specified, primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma and DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma [19].

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mchayleh, W.; Bedi, P.; Sehgal, R.; Solh, M. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells: The Future Is Now. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020207

AMA Style

Mchayleh W, Bedi P, Sehgal R, Solh M. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells: The Future Is Now. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8(2):207. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020207

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mchayleh, Wassim, Prabhjot Bedi, Rajesh Sehgal, and Melhem Solh. 2019. "Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells: The Future Is Now" Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 2: 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020207

APA Style

Mchayleh, W., Bedi, P., Sehgal, R., & Solh, M. (2019). Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells: The Future Is Now. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8020207

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop