Next Article in Journal
Maternal Serum Placental Growth Factor, Soluble Fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase-1, and Soluble Endoglin in Twin Gestations and the Risk of Preeclampsia—A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Immunomodulary Effects of Systematic Exercise in Older Adults and People with Parkinson’s Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 9
Issue 1
10.3390/jcm9010185
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization and Analysis of the Skin Microbiota in Rosacea: Impact of Systemic Antibiotics

by
Yu Ri Woo
1,
Se Hoon Lee
1,
Sang Hyun Cho
1,
Jeong Deuk Lee
1 and
Hei Sung Kim
1,2,*
1
Department of Dermatology, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea
2
Department of Biomedicine & Health Sciences, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(1), 185; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010185
Submission received: 15 December 2019 / Revised: 6 January 2020 / Accepted: 7 January 2020 / Published: 9 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Dermatology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Systemic antibiotics are extensively used to control the papules and pustules of rosacea. Hence, it is crucial to understand their impact on the rosacea skin microbiota which is thought to be perturbed. The purpose of this study was to compare the makeup and diversity of the skin microbiota in rosacea before and after taking oral antibiotics. We also compared the skin microbiota at baseline according to age and rosacea severity. A longitudinal cohort study was performed on 12 rosacea patients with papules/pustules and no recent use of oral and topical antimicrobials/retinoids. Patients were prescribed oral doxycycline, 100 mg, twice daily for six weeks. Skin areas on the cheek and nose were sampled for 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing at baseline, and after six weeks of doxycycline treatment. Eleven females and one male aged 20–79 (median 51) with a median Investigator’s Global Assessment score of 3 (moderate) were enrolled. At baseline, Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most dominant species followed by Cutibacterium acnes (formerly Propionibacterium acnes). In the 60 Over-age group, the prevalence of Cutibacterium acnes was lower than that of the 60 & Under-age group. Rosacea severity increased with age and was associated with a decrease in the relative abundance of Cutibacterium acnes and an increase of Snodgrassella alvi. Across all subjects, antibiotic treatment reduced clinical rosacea grades and was associated with an increase in the relative abundance of Weissella confusa (P = 0.008, 95% CI 0.13% to 0.61%). Bacterial diversity (alpha diversity) was not significantly altered by antibiotics treatment. Principal coordinates analysis showed mild clustering of samples by patient (ANOSIM, Analysis of Similarity, R = 0.119, P = 0.16) and scant clustering with treatment (ANOSIM, R = 0.002; P = 0.5). In conclusion, we believe that rosacea has a unique age-dependent characteristic (i.e., severity). Although we were not able to pinpoint a causative microbiota, our study provides a glimpse into the skin microbiota in rosacea and its modulation by systemic antibiotics.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rosacea is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition with diagnostic features of persistent facial erythema and phyma. It typically affects the central face. A number of clinical phenotypes such as fixed centrofacial erythema, phymatous changes, papules and pustules, flushing, telangiectasia, ocular manifestations are recognized [1,2]. In terms of pathogenesis, neurovascular dysregulation and aberrant innate immune response are two of the described abnormalities supposed to be involved in rosacea development, both of which can lead to cutaneous inflammation [3]. Evidence that the aberrant innate immune response plays a role in the pathogenesis of rosacea includes upregulation of LL-37 via enhanced processing of cathelicidin by the trypsin-like serine protease kallikrein 5 [4]. When injected to an animal model, cathelicidin peptides induced proinflammatory and angiogenic activity [5], theorizing that dysfunction of the innate immune system causes the clinical features of rosacea (i.e., inflammatory papulopustules).
Patients with rosacea who have papules and pustules are often treated with topical and/or systemic antimicrobials (i.e., metronidazole, ivermectin, erythromycin) [6]. Those with a significant number of papules and pustules require repeated courses of systemic antibiotics which are the same as those applied to inflammatory acne (tetracyclines such as tetracycline, doxycycline, and minocycline). The disappearance of rosacea papules and pustules with systemic antibiotics has been attributed to their anti-inflammatory activity. However, antibiotics (1) leading to complete abolition of the lesions rather than just blunting, and (2) being more effective than agents with much more potent anti-inflammatory effect (i.e., steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) suggest that bacteria play a role in the papules and pustules of rosacea.
Microbes such as Demodex folliculorum, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Bacillus oleronius, Helicobacter pylori, and Chlamydia pneumonia have been addressed to take part in rosacea [7,8,9,10,11], but the results have been inconsistent. As several of the identified microbes are skin commensals, it is difficult to prove that their presence is associated with the disease.
The challenge to characterize the role of microbes in rosacea stems from to the limitations of historic culture-dependent methods in identifying and studying microbes. In addition, rosacea, unlike acne, is distributed across all ages, which makes the interpretation complex as the relative abundance of dominant species varies among different age groups [12].
Amplification and sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene has been used to determine bacterial communities in various body habitats, including the skin [13]. Using this culture-free method, studies have looked into the action of antibiotics on gut microbiota, often describing changes in bacterial composition following antibiotic treatment [14]. The purpose of this study was to provide an overall picture of the influence of oral antibiotics on the composition and diversity of the rosacea skin microbiota which is supposedly altered. Moreover, we compared the skin microbiota between different age groups (Over 60 vs. 60 & Under) and rosacea severity (Investigator’s global assessment (IGA) score 3 vs. IGA 4).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

Patients newly diagnosed with rosacea by a dermatologist, were enrolled August 2017–June 2018, at the Department of Dermatology, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, Korea. Inclusion criteria were individuals over 18 with more than 10 inflammatory papules/pustules on the face (Grades 3 and 4 on the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) grading scale), and willingness to avoid facial washing and application of topical agents to the face for 12 h prior to skin sampling. Exclusion criteria included history of systemic or topical antibiotic use within one month of the baseline study visit, hypersensitivity to tetracyclines, systemic rosacea treatment within four weeks, topical rosacea treatment within two weeks, significant facial hair interfering with sampling, pregnancy or breast feeding status, and inability to provide an informed consent. The study was approved by Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital (The Catholic University of Korea) Institutional Review Board (OC17TNSI0057), and participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.

2.2. Antibiotic Treatment and Sample Collection

Participants were instructed to take doxycycline, 100 mg, twice daily for six weeks. Skin samples were collected at two visits across six weeks, one before treatment initiation and another approximately six weeks after the start of doxycycline therapy. Participants’ compliance to antibiotic treatment was initially checked (by interviewing the patient) at a separate visit made two weeks after the start of doxycycline. Here, the possible side effects of doxycycline such as nausea and diarrhea were inquired. Afterwards, all participants were asked to write a self-reported diary on the medication which was checked six weeks after the starting doxycycline (at the time of visit for the second skin sampling). At each visit (at baseline and after six weeks of doxycycline), skin samples were collected from the cheeks (4 cm2 area per side) and nose with a single sterile cotton swab (EASY SWAB, Hanil-Komed Inc., Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea). All sites (cheeks and nose) were rubbed 20 times with the cotton stick: 10 times in one direction and 10 times perpendicular to this direction. Microbiota sampling was conducted by the same investigator (H.S.K.) at all study visits.

2.3. DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Gene Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification and Sequencing

DNA was separated from the skin samples using an enzymatic lysis and bead-based tissue homogenization protocol; the samples were incubated shortly in a lytic enzyme mixture of lysozyme, mutanolysin, proteinase K, and lysostaphin, followed by mechanical lysis with silica beads (0.1 mm), as published beforehand [15]. The DNA cleanup was then conducted with a fecal DNA extraction kit (ZR Fecal DNA MiniPrep; Zymo Research (Irvine, CA, USA). After DNA extraction, the V3–V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq platform (250 base pairs, paired-end reads) as reported previously [16,17].

2.4. Data Analysis

After sequencing, de-multiplexing of the data based on the Illumina index reads was performed and the raw data were converted to FASTQ files. Illumina adapters were removed using the FASTP program [18] and error-correction was performed on the region where the two reads overlap. The paired reads were merged using FLASH v1.2.11 (http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/FLASH/) [19]. For precise Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) analysis, data containing sequence error (i.e., merged sequences shorter than 400 bp, raw reads with ambiguous base cells, chimeric sequences) were removed. The remaining representative reads from non-chimeric clusters were clustered de novo into OTUs (97% similarity threshold) using a CD-HIT-EST-based OTU analysis program (CD-HIT-OTU) (http://weizhongli-lab.org/cd-hit-otu) [20]. Afterwards, taxonomic assignments were performed using the basic local alignment search tool (BLASTN v2.4.0) (blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) [21] and the reference database (National Center for Biotechnology Information 16S, Bethesda, MD, USA). Observed relative abundances were estimated by dividing the observed number of 16S rRNA amplicon reads by the total number of reads per sample. Microbiota α diversity, representing microbial diversity within an individual sample, was computed in QIIME v1.9 (http://qiime.org/home_static/dataFiles.html) [22] through the whole tree phylogenetic diversity metric. Microbiota β diversity, which indicates the inter-variability of microbial diversity between samples, was examined through principal coordinates analysis of weighted UniFrac distances in QIIME and hierarchical clustering based on the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean algorithm in the R statistical software (r-project.org) (R Core Team). The flexible relationship between the samples were visualized through the PCoA and UPGMA tree.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Comparison α diversity and relative abundance of bacterial taxa between samples (complete sample sets from pre- and post-treatment groups, sample sets taken before starting treatment based on age (60 & Under vs. Over 60), and rosacea severity (IGA 3 vs. IGA 4)) were performed with Wilcoxon signed rank test/Wilcoxon rank sum test in R package v3.0.1. (cran.r-project.org). All other analyses and visualizations were performed with R and the boxplot package. Permutation tests were used to calculate statistical differences in microbiota in PCoA. For all statistical analyses, two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Demographics and relevant clinical features of patients included in this study are shown in Table 1 and Table S1. Our study included 12 Asian subjects with skin phototype 3 (50%), and 4 (50%) on the Fitzpatrick scale. One of the subjects (8.3%) was male and the mean age was 49.2 ± 18.6. In terms of rosacea severity (IGA), six patients were IGA grade 3 and six were IGA grade 4 (median IGA: 3) at baseline. After six weeks of oral doxycycline, seven patients were measured to be IGA grade 2 and five patients IGA grade 3 (median IGA: 2). The mean number of papules/pustules was 22.8 ± 9.4 at baseline and 8.6 ± 4.2 after six weeks of doxycycline treatment (P < 0.05).

3.1. Taxonomic Assignment

Our data set involved 24 samples across 12 patients sequenced to a mean (SD) read count of 156,699 (17,769) (Table S2). We identified 16 phyla, 22 classes, 65 orders, 149 families, 390 genera, and 998 species that were unique and present in at least one sample. There was dominance of Staphylococcus (24.7%), Cutibacterium (10.5%), Corynebacterium (7.8%), Pseudomonas (5.7%), and Snodgrassella (5.6%) at the genus level across all samples (Figure 1).

3.2. Relative Abundance of Individual Bacterial Taxa Pre- and Post- Doxycycline Treatment

We focused on the species level when assessing changes in abundance of individual bacterial taxa relative to the entire bacterial community in samples. Figure S1A,B provide results of the main bacterial phyla, genus, and species in our 12 subjects at baseline and after six weeks of doxycycline, respectively. Staphylococcus (28%), Cutibacterium (13%), Pseudomonas (9%), Corynebacterium (8%), Acinetobacter (7%), and Snodgrassella (6%) were the main bacterial genera found in untreated rosacea skin. The most dominant taxonomic groups at the species level in rosacea skin were: Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) (28%), followed by Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) (13%), Pseudomonas koreensis (8%), Actinetobactor haemolyticus (7%), and Snodgrassella alvi (S. alvi) (6%) (Figure 2). After six weeks of oral antibiotics, the predominant genera were as follows: Staphylococcus (22%), Stenotrophomonas (33%), Corynebacterium (8%) and Cutibacterium (7%). Among the bacterial species, S. epidermidis (22%) was most commonly found in the skin samples followed by Stenotrophomonas rhizophila (8%), C. acnes (7%), Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum (7%), etc. (Figure 2).
We identified one genus (with relative abundance of greater than 0.1% across all samples) and one species with statistically significant changes in relative abundance upon treatment with doxycycline (Table S3). Weissella confusa increased 3.43-fold (P = 0.008, 95% CI 0.13% to 0.61%) following treatment with doxycycline (Figure 3).

3.3. Relative Abundance of Individual Bacterial Taxa at Baseline According to Age, and Rosacea Severity

The study participants were divided into two age groups: the young and middle-aged adult group (ages 60 years and under, mean age: 42, n = 9), and the elderly group (ages over 60 years, mean age: 70, n = 3). Figure S2A,B provide results of the main bacterial phyla, genus, and species in our 60 & Under, and Over 60 subjects, respectively. Staphylococcus (32%), Cutibacterium (18%), and Snodgrassella (6%) were the main bacterial genera found in the 60 & Under age group skin. The most dominant taxonomic groups at the species level in 60 & Under skin were: S. epidermidis (31%), followed by C. acnes (17%), and S. alvi (6%) (Figure 4). In the Over 60-age group, the predominant genera were as follows: Pseudomonas (33%), Corynebacterium (17%) and Staphylococcus (16%). Among the bacterial species, Pseudomonas koreensis (33%) was most commonly found in the skin samples followed by Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum (17%), S. epidermidis (10%), S. alvi (5%) etc. (Figure 4).
We identified one genus (with relative abundance greater than 0.1% across all samples) and one species with statistically significant difference in relative abundance between the two age groups (Table S4). C. acnes showed a higher relative abundance in the 60 & Under-age group (Figure 5).
Figure S3A,B provides results of the main bacterial phyla, genus, and species according to rosacea severity (IGA 3 and IGA 4) at baseline. Staphylococcus (38%), Cutibacterium (22%), and Acinetobacter (10%), were the main bacterial genera found in the IGA 3 group skin. The most dominant taxonomic groups at the species level in IGA 3 skin were: S. epidermidis (38%), followed by C. acnes (22%), and Acinetobacter haemolyticus (9%) (Figure 6). In the IGA 4 group, the predominant genera were as follows: Pseudomonas (18%), Staphylococcus (17%), and Snodgrassella (12%). Among the bacterial species, S. epidermidis (17%) and Pseudomonas koreensis (16%) were most commonly found in the skin samples followed by S. alvi (12%), etc. (Figure 6).
We identified two genera (with relative abundance greater than 0.1% across all samples) and two species with significant difference in relative abundance between rosacea severity groups IGA 3 and IGA 4 (Table S5). Among these species, C. acnes (Figure 7) showed a higher mean relative abundance in IGA 3 skin. In contrast, the relative abundance of S. alvi (Figure 7) was higher in the IGA 4 population.

3.4. α Diversity

α diversity between the before treatment and after treatment group was compared using the inverse Simpson and Shannon indices. α diversity over treatment failed to reach statistical significance. Changes in α diversity with age (60 & Under vs. Over 60) and rosacea severity (IGA 3 vs. IGA 4) too were not significant.

3.5. β Diversity

We also assessed inter-sample diversity, or β diversity, based on principal coordinates analyses of weighted UniFrac distances. Similarity between samples across the three principal coordinates (PC1, PC2, and PC3) with samples that cluster close to one another indicates similar bacterial composition between those samples. The ANOSIM which generates an R test statistic stretching from −1 to 1 was used to measure clustering of samples by patient, and treatment (Figure 8). A positive R value indicates greater within-group similarity than between-group similarity, with greater magnitudes of the R value suggesting stronger clustering of samples. An R value of 0 indicates no clustering of samples, whereas a negative R value suggests greater between-group resemblance than within-group similarity. There was mild clustering of samples by patient (ANOSIM, R = 0.119, P = 0.16). Clustering by treatment (ANOSIM, R = 0.002; P = 0.5) was minimal.

4. Discussion

The role of skin microbiota in rosacea is of great interest to clinicians, patients, and researchers. This interest originates from the fact that microbes have long been addressed to take part in rosacea pathogenesis [23,24,25,26] and the efficacy of oral and topical antimicrobials in controlling the papules and pustules of rosacea. Our longitudinal cohort study examined the skin microbiota of untreated patients and the influence of systemic antibiotics on the skin microbiota. Through 16s rRNA gene sequencing, we found S. epidermidis and C. acnes to be prevalent in the untreated rosacea skin samples, consistent with prior findings [27,28,29,30]. Present in healthy and diseased skin, their roles as commensals or opportunistic organisms are not completely understood. Corynebacterium kroppenstedtii was also reported to be abundant in patients with rosacea [30] but was surprisingly scarce in our study population.
Cyclines are broad-spectrum bacteriostatic antibiotics and are commonly prescribed for those who have significant number of papules and pustules [31]. Tetracyclines have multiple mechanisms of action including antibacterial effect, inhibition of pro-inflammatory mediators and tissue destructive enzymes, and modulation of innate immunity, but it is not known which mechanism is the most relevant in attenuating the papules/pustules. As for our study, treatment with doxycycline clearly led to a decrease in rosacea severity (IGA) and the number of inflammatory papules/pustules.
Our findings of significant changes in relative abundance (%) of Weissella confusa may have important clinical implications. As for the bacteria, we observed a 3.43-fold increase after six weeks of doxycycline treatment. Weissella spp. are Gram-positive, catalase-negative, alpha hemolytic bacteria that appear as short rods or coccobacilli in pairs and chains [32]. Based on their unusual Gram stain morphology, they have often been confused with Lactobacillus spp. or viridans streptococci [33]. Weissella is a common inhabitant of the gut flora but not a part of the normal skin flora [33]. The clinical significance of Weissella confusa remains unclear in the setting of polymicrobial infections. Weissella confusa is found in fermented foods and has been suggested as a probiotic [34]. In particular, the cell-free culture supernatant of Weissella confusa carries various beneficial characteristics such as antibacterial potential and anti-inflammatory efficiency [35]. However, one should carefully interpret its increase as Weissella confusa has also been associated with sepsis and other serious infections in humans [36]. In fact, the abundance of Weissella genera showed positive correlation with rosacea severity in a twin study [27] (univariate random effect Poisson regression), which contradicts our findings.
Prior studies on skin disease (i.e., atopic dermatitis and inflammatory acne) have shown less bacterial diversity in the disease state [37] which was restored after systemic antimicrobial treatment [38,39]. As for our study, the α diversity (within-sample microbial diversity) failed to reach statistical significance over treatment. This may be due to the small number of our study participants (n = 12), but also suggests that an altered collective skin microbiota rather than a single culprit is involved in rosacea pathogenesis.
As for β Diversity, which is the inter-sample diversity, there was mild clustering of samples by patient (ANOSIM, R = 0.119; P = 0.16), indicating a distinctive microbial signature for each person. On the other hand, clustering by treatment (ANOSIM, R = 0.002; P = 0.5) was minimal, which is consistent with the knowledge that the skin microbiota is highly individualized with specific bacterial taxa persisting on a given person for months to years. The finding emphasizes the importance of taking paired samples from the same patient.
Age is known to influence skin microbiota composition, which partially explains the difference in microbial pathogenesis (C. acnes involvement) between acne and the papules and pustules of rosacea. As for our rosacea study population (mean age 49.2 ± 18.6), S. epidermidis (28%) was most prevalent followed by C. acnes (13%). This strikingly differs from our acne population data (n = 20, mean age 19.6 ± 7.5) where the most dominant taxonomic groups at the species level were: C. acnes (25%) followed by S. epidermidis (19%) (unpublished data). The relative abundance of C. acnes in our Over 60 age group (mean age: 70) was lower than that of the 60 & Under age group (mean age: 42) (0.9% vs. 17%) which is compatible with prior study results. Bensaleh et al. have associated changes in hormonal levels during menopause to the decrease of Cutibacterium species observed in the older age group [40]. Zhai et al. Ref. [12] have reported that C. acnes evolves with age, showing the lowest abundance in childhood (four–six years) (2.1%), a dramatic increase at puberty (11–13 years) (13.5%), a peak in young adults (25–34 years) (40.3%) and a subsequent decline with age (Middle age adults (37–53 years) (27.2%), and elderly (62–74 years) (8.7%)). It is notable that there is a sharp decline in C. acnes after the age 60. The elderly population were also reported to have more bacterial diversity than the other age groups [12,41], but we could not confirm this due to the small number of study participants.
Sex is also thought to influence the composition and diversity of the bacterial communities but to a lesser extent compared to age [12]. We were unable to personally look into this because of our predominantly female study population (11 females vs. one male). Still, we found a high relative abundance of Pseudomonas (33%) in the Over 60-age group at baseline, which is in line with findings from a prior study where elderly females had a greater abundance of Pseudomonas, Kocuria, and Flavobacterium than their male counterparts [12]. This variation is thought to rise from the difference in sebum level as well as the habitual use of cosmetics and moisturizers among the female population.
As for rosacea severity, disease severity was associated with higher age (mean age of the IGA 3 group: 36 vs. mean age of the IGA 4: 63 years, P < 0.05). Unlike acne, rosacea usually progresses over time. The age-dependent severity of rosacea has also been reported by Zaidi et al. [27] where rosacea was found to be more severe in the 30–60 age group compared to the 0–30 group. Although rosacea can develop in many ways and at any age, patient surveys indicate that it typically begins any time after age 30 as flushing or redness on cheeks, nose, chin or forehead that come and go. There is progression of the disease with time which likely explains the higher severity of rosacea in older ages. The prevalence of C. acnes and S. alvi was associated with the severity of rosacea (C. acnes: negative association and S. alvi: positive association). S. alvi, a species known as gut symbiont of bees has been identified as a core microbiota of Demodex mites from rosacea patients [24] and was also prevalent (6%) in our untreated skin samples. Interestingly, S. alvi has also been associated with inflammatory acne, with a significant decrease in its relative abundance after six weeks of doxycycline treatment (our study, data not shown). Although our findings suggest a subtle link between rosacea and demodex infestation, there is some doubt on the origin of S. alvi. Since Demodex mites usually reside in the hair follicles and sebaceous glands, they would not have been thoroughly collected through skin swabbing.
A negative correlation between C. acnes and rosacea severity was also observed by Rainer et al. [30], and though we underrated its significance, the protective role of C. acnes in maintaining healthy skin [42] should be appreciated. C. acnes can prevent other microbes from colonizing the skin by breaking down sebum into free fatty acids [43]. The lack of C. acnes in patients with rosacea [44] has been suggested as evidence that C. acnes does not play a major role in the pathogenesis of rosacea, but perhaps it is the deficiency of C. acnes compared to the healthy (or younger) population that is significant. C. acnes abundance has, in fact, been found to be decreased in certain skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis [45,46].
A potential limitation of our study is the low sample size. Moreover, the use of swabs for skin sampling may have failed to capture the bacterial community of the pilosebaceous unit. Although a recent study by Hall et al. [47] showed no difference in C. acnes-associated factors between surface and follicular sampling methods, simultaneous examination of the follicular microbiota may add insights on shifts in the skin microbiota observed in the present study.
Our study did not include further follow-up, but it would be interesting to explore what happens to the skin microbiota in rosacea after completion of the treatment course, and how quickly the bacterial communities return to their initial state, may this happen.
Finally, we were unable to obtain strain-level resolution of the bacteria. As the pathogenicity of different strains within the same bacterial species can vary, it would be valuable to identify the bacterial strains in rosacea and examine their alteration with antibiotic treatment.

5. Conclusions

We find rosacea to have a unique age-dependent characteristic (i.e., severity). Although we were not able to pinpoint a causative microbiota, our study provides a glimpse into the skin microbiota in rosacea and its modulation by systemic antibiotics.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/1/185/s1, Figure S1: Krona graph on skin microbiota in rosacea patients. Figure S2: Krona graph on baseline skin microbiota in rosacea patients (A) 60 & Under, and (B) Over 60 years of age. Figure S3: Krona graph on baseline skin microbiota according to rosacea severity. Table S1: title, Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Study Participants in detail. Table S2: Sample read counts. Table S3: Bacterial genera (with relative abundance of greater than 0.1% across all samples) and species with significant changes in mean relative abundance after doxycycline treatment. Weissella showed a higher relative abundance following treatment. Table S4: Bacterial genera (with relative abundance of greater than 0.1% across all samples) and species with significant difference in relative abundance between the two age groups (60 & Under, Over 60) at baseline. Cutibacterium showed a higher relative abundance in the 60 & Under-age group. Table S5: Bacterial genera (with relative abundance of greater than 0.1% across all samples) and species with significant difference in relative abundance between rosacea severity (IGA) 3 and IGA 4 group at baseline.

Author Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the concept and design of the work and approved the submitted version (Conceptualization, S.H.C., J.D.L., H.S.K.; Funding Acquisition, H.S.K; Investigation, H.S.K.; Project administration, S.H.L.; Supervision: S.H.C., J.D.L.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, Y.R.W., H.S.K.; Review and Editing, S.H.L., S.H.C., J.D.L. and H.S.K.). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant founded by the South Korean Government (2017R1C1B5016144), and a grant of translational R&D project through institute for bio-medical convergence, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gallo, R.L.; Granstein, R.D.; Kang, S.; Mannis, M.; Steinhoff, M.; Tan, J.; Thiboutot, D. Standard classification and pathophysiology of rosacea: The 2017 update by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2018, 78, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tan, J.; Berg, M.; Gallo, R.L.; Del Rosso, J.Q. Applying the phenotype approach for rosacea to practice and research. Br. J. Dermatol. 2018, 179, 741–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Steinhoff, M.; Buddenkotte, J.; Aubert, J.; Sulk, M.; Novak, P.; Schwab, V.D.; Mess, C.; Cevikbas, F.; Rivier, M.; Carlavan, I.; et al. Clinical, cellular, and molecular aspects in the pathophysiology of rosacea. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 2011, 15, 2–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yamasaki, K.; Di Nardo, A.; Bardan, A.; Murakami, M.; Ohtake, T.; Coda, A.; Dorschner, R.A.; Bonnart, C.; Descargues, P.; Hovnanian, A.; et al. Increased serine protease activity and cathelicidin promotes skin inflammation in rosacea. Nat. Med. 2007, 13, 975–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yamasaki, K.; Gallo, R.L. The molecular pathology of rosacea. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2009, 55, 77–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Pelle, M.T.; Crawford, G.H.; James, W.D. Rosacea: II. Therapy. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2004, 51, 499–512, quiz 513–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Forton, F.; Seys, B.; Marchal, J.L.; Song, A.M. Demodex folliculorum and topical treatment: Acaricidal action evaluated by standardized skin surface biopsy. Br. J. Dermatol. 1998, 138, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lacey, N.; Delaney, S.; Kavanagh, K.; Powell, F.C. Mite-related bacterial antigens stimulate inflammatory cells in rosacea. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007, 157, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dahl, M.V.; Ross, A.J.; Schlievert, P.M. Temperature regulates bacterial protein production: possible role in rosacea. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2004, 50, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rebora, A.; Drago, F.; Picciotto, A. Helicobacter pylori in patients with rosacea. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1994, 89, 1603–1604. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fernandez-Obregon, A.; Patton, D.L. The role of Chlamydia pneumoniae in the etiology of acne rosacea: response to the use of oral azithromycin. Cutis 2007, 79, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhai, W.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Fei, W.; Chang, Y.; Cheng, S.; Zhou, Y.; Gao, J.; Tang, X.; Zhang, X.; et al. Profile of the skin microbiota in a healthy Chinese population. J. Dermatol. 2018, 45, 1289–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Grice, E.A.; Kong, H.H.; Conlan, S.; Deming, C.B.; Davis, J.; Young, A.C.; Bouffard, G.G.; Blakesley, R.W.; Murray, P.R.; Green, E.D.; et al. Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome. Science 2009, 324, 1190–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Panda, S.; El khader, I.; Casellas, F.; Lopez Vivancos, J.; Garcia Cors, M.; Santiago, A.; Cuenca, S.; Guarner, F.; Manichanh, C. Short-term effect of antibiotics on human gut microbiota. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roghmann, M.C.; Lydecker, A.D.; Hittle, L.; DeBoy, R.T.; Nowak, R.G.; Johnson, J.K.; Mongodin, E.F. Comparison of the Microbiota of Older Adults Living in Nursing Homes and the Community. mSphere 2017, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ishaq, H.M.; Mohammad, I.S.; Shahzad, M.; Ma, C.; Raza, M.A.; Wu, X.; Guo, H.; Shi, P.; Xu, J. Molecular Alteration Analysis of Human Gut Microbial Composition in Graves’ disease Patients. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 1558–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Porcar, M.; Louie, K.B.; Kosina, S.M.; Van Goethem, M.W.; Bowen, B.P.; Tanner, K.; Northen, T.R. Microbial Ecology on Solar Panels in Berkeley, CA, United States. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Chen, S.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, J. Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, i884–i890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Magoc, T.; Salzberg, S.L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2957–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, W.; Fu, L.; Niu, B.; Wu, S.; Wooley, J. Ultrafast clustering algorithms for metagenomic sequence analysis. Brief. Bioinf. 2012, 13, 656–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Z.; Schwartz, S.; Wagner, L.; Miller, W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J. Comput. Biol. 2000, 7, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Pena, A.G.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Picardo, M.; Ottaviani, M. Skin microbiome and skin disease: The example of rosacea. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2014, 48 (Suppl. 1), S85–S86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Murillo, N.; Aubert, J.; Raoult, D. Microbiota of Demodex mites from rosacea patients and controls. Microb. Pathog. 2014, 71–72, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Holmes, A.D. Potential role of microorganisms in the pathogenesis of rosacea. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2013, 69, 1025–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lazaridou, E.; Giannopoulou, C.; Fotiadou, C.; Vakirlis, E.; Trigoni, A.; Ioannides, D. The potential role of microorganisms in the development of rosacea. J. Dtsch Dermatol. Ges. 2011, 9, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zaidi, A.K.; Spaunhurst, K.; Sprockett, D.; Thomason, Y.; Mann, M.W.; Fu, P.; Ammons, C.; Gerstenblith, M.; Tuttle, M.S.; Popkin, D.L. Characterization of the facial microbiome in twins discordant for rosacea. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Whitfeld, M.; Gunasingam, N.; Leow, L.J.; Shirato, K.; Preda, V. Staphylococcus epidermidis: A possible role in the pustules of rosacea. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2011, 64, 49–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Eriksson, G.; Nord, C.E. Impact of topical metronidazole on the skin and colon microflora in patients with rosacea. Infection 1987, 15, 8–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rainer, B.M.; Thompson, K.G.; Antonescu, C.; Florea, L.; Mongodin, E.F.; Bui, J.; Fischer, A.H.; Pasieka, H.B.; Garza, L.A.; Kang, S.; et al. Characterization and Analysis of the Skin Microbiota in Rosacea: A Case-Control Study. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dursun, R.; Daye, M.; Durmaz, K. Acne and rosacea: What’s new for treatment? Dermatol. Ther. 2019, 32, e13020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Collins, M.D.; Samelis, J.; Metaxopoulos, J.; Wallbanks, S. Taxonomic studies on some leuconostoc-like organisms from fermented sausages: description of a new genus Weissella for the Leuconostoc paramesenteroides group of species. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1993, 75, 595–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kamboj, K.; Vasquez, A.; Balada-Llasat, J.M. Identification and significance of Weissella species infections. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, K.W.; Park, J.Y.; Jeong, H.R.; Heo, H.J.; Han, N.S.; Kim, J.H. Probiotic properties of Weissella strains isolated from human faeces. Anaerobe 2012, 18, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Dey, D.K.; Khan, I.; Kang, S.C. Anti-bacterial susceptibility profiling of Weissella confusa DD_A7 against the multidrug-resistant ESBL-positive E. coli. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 128, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Fairfax, M.R.; Lephart, P.R.; Salimnia, H. Weissella confusa: problems with identification of an opportunistic pathogen that has been found in fermented foods and proposed as a probiotic. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Williams, M.R.; Gallo, R.L. The role of the skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015, 15, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kelhala, H.L.; Aho, V.T.E.; Fyhrquist, N.; Pereira, P.A.B.; Kubin, M.E.; Paulin, L.; Palatsi, R.; Auvinen, P.; Tasanen, K.; Lauerma, A. Isotretinoin and lymecycline treatments modify the skin microbiota in acne. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bradley, C.W.; Morris, D.O.; Rankin, S.C.; Cain, C.L.; Misic, A.M.; Houser, T.; Mauldin, E.A.; Grice, E.A. Longitudinal Evaluation of the Skin Microbiome and Association with Microenvironment and Treatment in Canine Atopic Dermatitis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2016, 136, 1182–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bensaleh, H.; Belgnaoui, F.Z.; Douira, L.; Berbiche, L.; Senouci, K.; Hassam, B. [Skin and menopause]. Ann. Endocrinol (Paris) 2006, 67, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Juge, R.; Rouaud-Tinguely, P.; Breugnot, J.; Servaes, K.; Grimaldi, C.; Roth, M.P.; Coppin, H.; Closs, B. Shift in skin microbiota of Western European women across aging. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Barnard, E.; Shi, B.; Kang, D.; Craft, N.; Li, H. The balance of metagenomic elements shapes the skin microbiome in acne and health. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 39491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Marples, R.R.; Downing, D.T.; Kligman, A.M. Control of free fatty acids in human surface lipids by Corynebacterium acnes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1971, 56, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Jahns, A.C.; Lundskog, B.; Dahlberg, I.; Tamayo, N.C.; McDowell, A.; Patrick, S.; Alexeyev, O.A. No link between rosacea and Propionibacterium acnes. Apmis 2012, 120, 922–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kong, H.H.; Oh, J.; Deming, C.; Conlan, S.; Grice, E.A.; Beatson, M.A.; Nomicos, E.; Polley, E.C.; Komarow, H.D.; Murray, P.R.; et al. Temporal shifts in the skin microbiome associated with disease flares and treatment in children with atopic dermatitis. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 850–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Gao, Z.; Tseng, C.H.; Strober, B.E.; Pei, Z.; Blaser, M.J. Substantial alterations of the cutaneous bacterial biota in psoriatic lesions. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hall, J.B.; Cong, Z.; Imamura-Kawasawa, Y.; Kidd, B.A.; Dudley, J.T.; Thiboutot, D.M.; Nelson, A.M. Isolation and Identification of the Follicular Microbiome: Implications for Acne Research. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2018, 138, 2033–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Jcm 09 00185 g001 550
Figure 1. Taxonomy plot of the microbial communities of rosacea patients before (B) and after (A) six weeks of doxycycline.
Figure 1. Taxonomy plot of the microbial communities of rosacea patients before (B) and after (A) six weeks of doxycycline.
Jcm 09 00185 g001
Jcm 09 00185 g002 550
Figure 2. Bar graph on skin microbiota in rosacea patients Before treatment, and after six weeks of doxycycline.
Figure 2. Bar graph on skin microbiota in rosacea patients Before treatment, and after six weeks of doxycycline.
Jcm 09 00185 g002
Jcm 09 00185 g003 550
Figure 3. Weissella confusa showing a significantly higher relative abundance upon doxycycline treatment.
Figure 3. Weissella confusa showing a significantly higher relative abundance upon doxycycline treatment.
Jcm 09 00185 g003
Jcm 09 00185 g004 550
Figure 4. Bar graph on baseline skin microbiota in rosacea patients according to age (60 & Under, and Over 60).
Figure 4. Bar graph on baseline skin microbiota in rosacea patients according to age (60 & Under, and Over 60).
Jcm 09 00185 g004
Jcm 09 00185 g005 550
Figure 5. C. acnes showing a significantly higher relative abundance in the 60 & Under-age group at baseline.
Figure 5. C. acnes showing a significantly higher relative abundance in the 60 & Under-age group at baseline.
Jcm 09 00185 g005
Jcm 09 00185 g006 550
Figure 6. Bar graph on baseline skin microbiota according to rosacea severity (IGA 3 and IGA 4).
Figure 6. Bar graph on baseline skin microbiota according to rosacea severity (IGA 3 and IGA 4).
Jcm 09 00185 g006
Jcm 09 00185 g007 550
Figure 7. C. acnes showing a significantly lower relative abundance in the IGA 4 rosacea severity group at baseline. Snodgrassella alvi with a higher relative abundance in the IGA 4 group at baseline.
Figure 7. C. acnes showing a significantly lower relative abundance in the IGA 4 rosacea severity group at baseline. Snodgrassella alvi with a higher relative abundance in the IGA 4 group at baseline.
Jcm 09 00185 g007
Jcm 09 00185 g008 550
Figure 8. Microbiota β diversity (between-sample microbial diversity) based on principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of weighted UniFrac distances. Two-dimensional PCoA plots display inter-sample distances by three principal coordinates (PC1, PC2, and PC3) with labeling of individual samples by patient (A) and treatment (B), for patients 1 to 12. Principal coordinates, calculated from a distance matrix of weighted Unifrac distances and have no units.
Figure 8. Microbiota β diversity (between-sample microbial diversity) based on principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of weighted UniFrac distances. Two-dimensional PCoA plots display inter-sample distances by three principal coordinates (PC1, PC2, and PC3) with labeling of individual samples by patient (A) and treatment (B), for patients 1 to 12. Principal coordinates, calculated from a distance matrix of weighted Unifrac distances and have no units.
Jcm 09 00185 g008
Table
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants.
General Characteristics (n = 12)
Sex (M/F), n (%)1/11 (8.3%)
Age (years), median (range)51 (20–79)
Fitzpatrick Skin Type, median (range)3 (3–4)
Duration of Rosacea (years), median (range)2 (less than a year–10)
Baseline Rosacea severity (IGA), median (range)3 (3–4)
Rosacea severity (IGA) after 6 weeks of oral doxycycline, median (range)2 (2–3)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Woo, Y.R.; Lee, S.H.; Cho, S.H.; Lee, J.D.; Kim, H.S. Characterization and Analysis of the Skin Microbiota in Rosacea: Impact of Systemic Antibiotics. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010185

AMA Style

Woo YR, Lee SH, Cho SH, Lee JD, Kim HS. Characterization and Analysis of the Skin Microbiota in Rosacea: Impact of Systemic Antibiotics. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(1):185. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010185

Chicago/Turabian Style

Woo, Yu Ri, Se Hoon Lee, Sang Hyun Cho, Jeong Deuk Lee, and Hei Sung Kim. 2020. "Characterization and Analysis of the Skin Microbiota in Rosacea: Impact of Systemic Antibiotics" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 1: 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010185

APA Style

Woo, Y. R., Lee, S. H., Cho, S. H., Lee, J. D., & Kim, H. S. (2020). Characterization and Analysis of the Skin Microbiota in Rosacea: Impact of Systemic Antibiotics. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010185

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop