Next Article in Journal
Mentally Sick or Not—(Bio)Markers of Psychiatric Disorders Needed
Previous Article in Journal
Imaging Bacteria with Radiolabelled Probes: Is It Feasible?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Survival Outcomes of Patients with Pathologically Proven Positive Lymph Nodes at Time of Radical Cystectomy with or without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

From Basic Science to Clinical Research to Develop New Solutions to Improve Diagnoses and Treatment of Bladder Cancer Patients

1
Department of Urology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Urological Research Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
2
Luzerner Kantonsspital, Spitalstrasse, CH-6000 Luzern, Switzerland
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(8), 2373; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082373
Submission received: 20 July 2020 / Accepted: 21 July 2020 / Published: 25 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Outcomes and Therapeutic Management of Bladder Cancer)
Bladder cancer (BCa) is the tenth most common form of cancer worldwide, with 549,000 new cases and 200,000 deaths estimated in 2018 [1]. To address the several unmet questions in the field of BCa research, recently the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) selected a panel of experts to define important topics in the field of BCa and to propose possible management solutions [2,3]. In this Special Issue on outcomes and therapeutic management of bladder cancer, we collected a series of articles treating some of the most important topics for the urological community. First, the use of robotic surgery in the treatment of BCa is rapidly increasing, surpassing the use of open surgery in tertiary referral centers [4]. In this regard, literature reporting the efficacy of this technique, in comparison to the old standard, is rapidly increasing [5]. In this issue, we found in a big multicenter collaboration the equivalence of open versus robotic radical cystectomy (RC) in the treatment of BCa patients [6]. Second, functional outcomes after radical cystectomy need to be further reported and investigated to increase the quality of life of BCa patients. Tuderti et al. [7] reported their experience of patients treated with sex sparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy in female patients receiving an intracorporeal neobladder reporting good oncological and functional outcomes 12 months after treatment. From the same institution, Claroni et al. [8] reported on recovery outcomes from anesthesia after robotic-assisted RC.
Third, basic science needs to increase the outcome classification of BCa and the efficacy of diagnostic strategies for an early diagnosis in patients with their first episode of BCa and promptly diagnose a recurrence of BCa in patients who have been already treated. Kim et al. [9] and Sikic et al. [10] and Montero-Reis et al. [11] proposed with different techniques potential markers and therapeutic targets that could improve clinical practices in the future. Fourth, the careful evaluation of variant histology can impact survival outcomes and similarly define optimal treatment strategies by proposing different diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in those patients affected by non-urothelial BCa tumors [12]. Zhou et al. [13] reported on survival outcomes of patients affected by clear cell adenocarcinoma, finding poorer prognosis compared to urothelial cancer. These results confirmed previous findings on this topic [14]. Finally, in this regard the impact of local surgery on patients affected by metastatic BCa is one of the new studied areas in this field [15,16]. I would like to thank the editorial office, authors, reviewers and all the readers for their efforts in putting together this series.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Witjes, J.A.; Babjuk, M.; Bellmunt, J.; Bruins, H.M.; De Reijke, T.M.; De Santis, M.; Gillessen, S.; James, N.; MacLennan, S.; Palou, J.; et al. EAU-ESMO Consensus Statements on the Management of Advanced and Variant Bladder Cancer—An International Collaborative Multistakeholder Effort†. Eur. Urol. 2020, 77, 223–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Horwich, A.; Babjuk, M.; Bellmunt, J.; Bruins, H.; De Reijke, T.; De Santis, M.; Gillessen, S.; James, N.; MacLennan, S.; Palou, J.; et al. EAU–ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer—An international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: Under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1697–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zamboni, S.; Shariat, S.F.; Mathieu, R.; Xylinas, E.; Abufaraj, M.; D’Andrea, D.; Tan, W.S.; Kelly, J.D.; Simone, G.; Gallucci, M.; et al. Differences in trends in the use of robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy and changes over time in peri-operative outcomes among selected centres in North America and Europe: An international multicentre collaboration. BJU Int. 2019, 124, 656–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shariat, S.F.; Moschini, M.; D’Andrea, D.; Abufaraj, M.; Foerster, B.; Mathieu, R.; Gust, K.M.; Gontero, P.; Simone, G.; Meraney, A.; et al. Comparative Effectiveness in Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic versus Open Radical Cystectomy: Results from a Multicenter Contemporary Retrospective Cohort Study. Eur. Urol. Focus 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Moschini, M.; Zamboni, S.; Shariat, S.F.; Mathieu, R.; Xylinas, E.; Tan, W.S.; Kelly, J.D.; Simone, G.; Meraney, A.; Krishna, S.; et al. Open Versus Robotic Cystectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis Comparing Survival Outcomes. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Tuderti, G.; Mastroianni, R.; Flammia, S.; Ferriero, M.; Leonardo, C.; Anceschi, U.; Brassetti, A.; Guaglianone, S.; Gallucci, M.; Simone, G. Sex-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Padua Ileal Neobladder in Female: Surgical Technique, Perioperative, Oncologic and Functional Outcomes. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Claroni, C.; Covotta, M.; Torregiani, G.; Marcelli, M.E.; Tuderti, G.; Simone, G.; Di Uccio, A.S.; Zinilli, A.; Forastiere, E. Recovery from Anesthesia after Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Two Different Reversals of Neuromuscular Blockade. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kim, D.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, J.-S.; Kim, S.; Kim, K.-H. Differential Expression and Clinicopathological Significance of HER2, Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase and PD-L1 in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sikic, D.; Eckstein, M.; Wirtz, R.; Jarczyk, J.; Worst, T.S.; Porubsky, S.; Keck, B.; Kunath, F.; Weyerer, V.; Breyer, J.; et al. FOXA1 Gene Expression for Defining Molecular Subtypes of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer after Radical Cystectomy. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Monteiro-Reis, S.; Blanca, A.; Tedim-Moreira, J.; Carneiro, I.; Felizardo, D.; Monteiro, P.; Oliveira, J.; Antunes, L.; Henrique, R.; Lopez-Beltran, A.; et al. A Multiplex Test Assessing MiR663ame and VIMme in Urine Accurately Discriminates Bladder Cancer from Inflammatory Conditions. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Abufaraj, M.; Foerster, B.; Schernhammer, E.; Moschini, M.; Kimura, S.; Hassler, M.R.; Preston, M.A.; Karakiewicz, P.I.; Remzi, M.; Shariat, S.F. Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Disease Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes. Eur. Urol. 2018, 75, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhou, Z.; Kinslow, C.J.; Wang, P.; Huang, B.; Cheng, S.K.; Deutsch, I.; Gentry, M.S.; Sun, R.C. Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Urinary Bladder Is a Glycogen-Rich Tumor with Poorer Prognosis. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Moschini, M.; D’Andrea, D.; Korn, S.; Irmak, Y.; Shariat, S.F.; Compérat, E.; Shariat, S.F. Characteristics and clinical significance of histological variants of bladder cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2017, 14, 651–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Abufaraj, M.; Gust, K.; Moschini, M.; Foerster, B.; Soria, F.; Mathieu, R.; Shariat, S.F. Management of muscle invasive, locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A literature review with emphasis on the role of surgery. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2016, 5, 735–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Moschini, M.; Xylinas, E.; Zamboni, S.; Mattei, A.; Niegisch, G.; Yu, E.Y.; Bamias, A.; Agarwal, N.; Sridhar, S.S.; Sternberg, C.N.; et al. Efficacy of Surgery in the Primary Tumor Site for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: Analysis of an International, Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Database. Eur. Urol. Oncol. 2020, 3, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moschini, M. From Basic Science to Clinical Research to Develop New Solutions to Improve Diagnoses and Treatment of Bladder Cancer Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082373

AMA Style

Moschini M. From Basic Science to Clinical Research to Develop New Solutions to Improve Diagnoses and Treatment of Bladder Cancer Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(8):2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082373

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moschini, Marco. 2020. "From Basic Science to Clinical Research to Develop New Solutions to Improve Diagnoses and Treatment of Bladder Cancer Patients" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 8: 2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082373

APA Style

Moschini, M. (2020). From Basic Science to Clinical Research to Develop New Solutions to Improve Diagnoses and Treatment of Bladder Cancer Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(8), 2373. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082373

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop