Next Article in Journal
Simulation of Internet of Things Water Management for Efficient Rice Irrigation in Rwanda
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Genomic Characterization and Expression Analysis of the Lipoxygenase Gene Family in Watermelon under Hormonal Treatments
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/agriculture10100432
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutritional and Phenolic Profile of Early and Late Harvested Amaranth Leaves Grown Under Cultivated Conditions

by
Tlou Grace Manyelo
1,2,
Nthabiseng Amenda Sebola
1 and
Monnye Mabelebele
1,*
1
Department of Agriculture and Animal Health, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida 1710, South Africa
2
Department of Agricultural Economics and Animal Production, University of Limpopo, Sovenga 0727, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2020, 10(10), 432; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10100432
Submission received: 5 August 2020 / Revised: 23 September 2020 / Accepted: 25 September 2020 / Published: 25 September 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Amaranth leaves are edible vegetables with high nutritional value that depends on the harvest stage. This study evaluated the nutritional and chemical profile of amaranth leaves harvested at days 65 and 120. Samples were collected, air-dried, and milled to pass through a 1-mm sieve before analysis. Higher (p < 0.05) crude protein (CP) and gross energy (GE) were observed in early harvested leaves than late harvested leaves. In addition, late harvested leaves had higher (p < 0.05) calcium, magnesium, and sodium contents than early harvested leaves; early harvested leaves had higher (p < 0.05) threonine, lysine, and leucine contents than late harvested leaves. Furthermore, early harvested leaves showed higher (p < 0.05) rutin, hyperoside, tryptophan, quercetin, and kaempferol rutinoside contents than late harvested leaves. A strong positive correlation was observed between nutrition composition and phenolic compounds. It can be concluded that both early and late harvested amaranth leaves are a promising source of nutrients and phenolic compounds that can help in providing new opportunities for their use in the food and pharmaceutical industries.

1. Introduction

A trend has been observed recently where consumers are beginning to develop an interest in healthy diets containing plant-based foods such as fruits and vegetables, cereals, legumes, and nuts [1]. These plant-based foods not only play a significant role in improving and maintaining human health, but are also environmentally sustainable [2]. According to a World Health Organization (WHO) report, the majority of developing countries are faced with the challenge of macronutrient deficiencies mostly targeting younger children and pregnant women [3]. Moreover, for any population to maintain healthy behavior, accessibility, availability, and affordability of a variety of foods from either plant or animal origin play a significant role [4]. One identified crop that has the potential to alleviate malnutrition and is readily accessible and affordable is ancient amaranth, which has been receiving renewed attention today. It is regarded as a leafy green vegetable that has the potential of being part of a healthy diet [5,6]. This leafy vegetable is abundant in vitamins, minerals, and fiber but low in calories [7]. Thus, consuming a diet rich in amaranth can offer numerous health benefits including reduced risk of obesity, heart disease, high blood pressure, and mental decline [7,8]. Furthermore, amaranth leaves have high protein content and balanced amino acid composition [9]. Several studies have proven health benefits derived from human beings consuming the amaranth vegetable. Such proven health benefits include assisting in the recovery of severely malnourished children and an increase in the body mass index of people [10]. However, the amaranth vegetable contains secondary metabolites such as tannins, oxalates, phytates, trypsin inhibitors, saponins, and nitrates, which are reported to reduce the availability of certain minerals such as calcium in the human body [11,12]. However, several methods have been successfully employed to decrease concentrations of these chemicals and make it suitable for feeding [13,14].
The most attractive part of amaranth is its agronomical traits, which include its drought resistant nature and high tolerance to arid conditions. However, prolonged dry periods induce flowering and decrease leaf yields [15]. Efficient use of amaranth leaves as food depends on nutritional profile, which in turn influences the quantity and quality of outputs from animal production systems. The stage of harvest can be used to measure the nutritional profile of crops like amaranth and has shown to affect crop yields and nutritional contents [16]. Moreover, soil conditions, fertilizers, and moisture availability are also known as factors that can affect crop yields and nutritional composition. Harvesting early before the plant reaches its maturity stage or late when the plant has surpassed its maturity age can have a negative effect on the nutritional status of crops [17,18]. This negative effect has shown to occur mostly with protein content because it can be easily affected by the stage of maturity [19]. A decrease in protein normally favors an increase in structural components of plants such as lignin, hemi-cellulose, and cellulose as well as anti-nutritional compounds [17]. An increase in these structural components has been shown to decrease palatability and digestibility, whereas anti-nutritional factors have been reported to inhibit the availability of other nutrients and thus result in a negative effect [11,12,20,21]. It is therefore of paramount importance to determine what stage of harvest is suitable when considering utilizing amaranth leaves for food. Limited information is available on at which stage of growth amaranth leaves can be harvested in order to maximize nutrient availability principally for species grown under cultivated South African conditions. Thus, the core aim of this study was to evaluate the nutritional and chemical profile of amaranth leaves grown under cultivated conditions harvested at day 65 (before the plant reaches maturity) and 120 (after the plant has reached its maturity stage).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Harvesting of Amaranth Leaves

Amaranth cruentus (Latin) leaves used in the present study were grown under a controlled field trial in the Northwest Province of South Africa. The mean temperatures in the area are above 22 °C in summer and below 20 °C in winter, and it lies at a latitude of 25.6200°S and longitude 27.9800°E. This variety was grown in September 2019 under dry land conditions that collect a mean annual rainfall of less than 250 mm. Amaranth leaves were harvested in two stages, resulting in an early and a late harvest. The first harvest (early harvest) of leaves was done before the plant reached maturity. The second harvest of leaves was done at day 120 of the cycle, when the plant had reached maturity. The harvested leaves were then independently dried in a well-ventilated laboratory to obtain constant weight and milled into powder through a 1-mm sieve using a hammer mill before being subjected to chemical analyses as described below.

2.2. Chemical Analysis

Proximate analysis for moisture, ash, crude protein (CP, N × 6.25), fat, and starch were carried out according to Association of Official Analytical Chemist (AOAC) [22] method number 942.05. Ground samples of amaranth leaves were oven-dried and weighed. Thereafter, samples in a crucible were ashed in a muffle furnace at 550 °C for 6 h. The ash was acid digested by adding 1 mL 55% (v/v) HNO3. After cooling, calcium, magnesium, manganese, zinc, iron, sodium, potassium, copper, sulfur, and phosphorus concentrations were determined by AOAC method 6.1.2 using inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were established according to the methods of Van Soest et al. [23]. The gross energy (GE) contents of the milled samples and excreta were determined with adiabatic bomb calorimetry. Fat and ether extract lipid content was estimated using TecatorSoxtec.

2.3. Amino Acid Determination

Amino acid separation and detection were performed using a Waters Acquity Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatograph (UPLC) fitted with a photodiode array (PDA) detector. One µL of sample/standard solution was injected into the mobile phase, which conveys the derivatized amino acids onto a Waters UltraTax C 18 column (2.1 × 50 mm × 1.7 µm) held at 60 °C. Elution of analytes off the column was performed by running a gradient. Analytes eluting off the column were detected by the PDA detector, with each amino acid coming off the column at a unique retention time.

2.4. Phenolic Compounds Determination

The extracts were prepared by using 2 g dry leaf material + 15 mL 50% methanol/1% formic acid in water with ultrasonication for 1 h and standing overnight, followed by centrifugation and transfer of the supernatant to a glass vial ready for the liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer (LC-MS) analysis. A quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer (MS) connected to a UPLC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used for high-resolution UPLC-MS analysis. Electrospray ionization was used in negative mode with a cone voltage of 15 V, desolvation temperature of 275 °C, and desolvation gas at 650 L/h, and the rest of the MS settings were optimized for best resolution and sensitivity. Data were acquired by scanning from m/z 150 to 1500 m/z in resolution mode as well as in MSE mode.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The collected data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA of SAS [24] software. The general linear model employed was:
Yij = µ + SMi + Eij
where Yijk is the observation of the dependent variable ijk (chemical components of leaves); µ is the fixed effect of the population mean for the variable; SMi is the stage harvested of leaves (i = 2; early and late); and Eij is the random error associated with observation ij, assumed to be normally and independently distributed. Where significant differences were observed, mean separation was done using the Least Significance Difference (LSD) test at the 5% level of significance. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between phenolic compounds with chemical composition and mineral compositions. Principal component analysis (PCA) analysis was conducted using PAST version 4.02, a software for scientific data analysis with functions for data manipulation, plotting, univariate, and multivariate statistics analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Proximate Composition of Amaranth Leaves Harvested at Different Stages

The results for the proximate composition of early and late harvested leaves are presented in Table 1. Higher (p < 0.05) dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) were observed in early harvested leaves (92.65 and 23.23 g/100 g) as compared to those that were harvested late (91.38 and 16.46 g/100 g). The crude fiber (CF) content of late harvested leaves (17.74 g/100 g) was higher (p < 0.05) than early harvested leaves (17.14 g/100 g). However, early harvested leaves (15.40, 7.14, 1.95 and 14.50 g/100 g, respectively) had higher (p < 0.05) NDF, ADF, acid detergent lignin (ADL), and GE than late harvested leaves (14.45, 6.61, 1.35 and 12.44 g/100 g, respectively). Late harvested leaves (1.52 and 1.11 g/100 g) showed higher (p < 0.05) ether extracts (EE) and starch contents than early harvested leaves (1.12 and 0.38 g/100 g). Ash contents of early harvested leaves (21.18 g/100 g) were higher (p < 0.05) than late matured leaves (17.70 g/100 g).

3.2. Mineral Composition of Early and Late Harvested Leaves

Table 2 presents the mineral contents of amaranth leaves harvested at different stages. Late harvested amaranth leaves had higher (p < 0.05) concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and sodium (56,000, 20,350, and 428.21 mg/kg, respectively) than those at the early stage (428.21, 15,295, and 287.87 mg/kg). Concentrations of phosphorus and potassium were higher (p < 0.05) in early harvested leaves than in late harvested leaves. Early harvested leaves showed higher (p < 0.05) copper, manganese, iron, and zinc (8.95, 583.28, 372.34, and 42.44 mg/kg, respectively) compared to late harvested leaves, which exhibited lower concentrations (3.45, 335.95, 279.95, and 29.95 mg/kg) of these trace minerals.

3.3. Amino Acid Profiles of Amaranth Leaves Harvested at Different Stages

The amino acid composition of early and late harvested amaranth leaves is shown in Table 3 where the results showed that no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed in the histidine, tyrosine, and methionine contents of early and late harvested leaves, even though early harvested leaves showed slightly high contents of the above-mentioned amino acids. Early harvested leaves had higher (p < 0.05) arginine, threonine, lysine, and leucine contents (0.90, 0.85, 1.73, and 1.55 g/100 CP respectively), whilst late harvested leaves exhibited lower contents (0.59, 0.58, 1.23, and 1.07 g/100 CP). Late harvested leaves contained higher (p < 0.05) valine contents (1.84 g/100 CP) as compared to early harvested leaves (1.51 g/100 CP). No significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed in glycine, isoleucine, and phenylalanine contents across all the leaves irrespective of the harvesting stage. However, early harvested leaves had higher (p < 0.05) serine, aspartic acid, glutamine, alanine, and proline contents (0.90, 2.16, 2.94, 1.27, and 0.87 g/100 CP, respectively) than late harvested leaves (0.60, 1.36, 1.78, 0.92, and 0.62 g/100 CP, respectively).

3.4. Phenolic Compounds and Pearson’s Correlation

The phenolic compounds of early and late harvested amaranth leaves are shown in Table 4. Early harvested leaves showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) contents of rutin, hyperoside, tryptophan, quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside, and kaempferol rutinoside (1222.79, 206.45, 87.77, 79.31 and 188.80 mg/kg, respectively) as compared to late harvested leaves (1041.92, 130.52, 37.62, 73.03, and 164.00 mg/kg, respectively).
The results on the correlation between phenolic compounds, macro-minerals, and chemical composition are presented in Table 5. This shows that there is a negative correlation between calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) with rutin (Rut), Hyperoside (Hyp), tryptophan (Try), quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside (Que) and kaempferol rutinoside (Kru). A strong positive relationship was detected between manganese (Mn) and potassium (K) with Rut, Hyp, Try, Que, and Kru, whilst a negative association between Mn and K with Mg and Ca was observed. A negative correlation was seen between sodium (Na) and Rut, Hyp, Try, Que and Kru, phosphorus (P) and CP showed a strong positive correlation with Rut, Hyp, Try, Que, and Kru. Moreover, P and CP showed a strong correlation with Mn and K. However, P and CP showed a negative correlation with Ca, Mg and Na. There was a negative correlation between CF and Rut, Hyp, Try, Que, and Kru. However, minerals yielded a positive correlation between CF and Ca, Mg and Na; whilst a negative relationship was observed between CF and Mn, K, P, and CP. A positive correlation was observed between NDF, ADF and Rut, Hyp, Try, Que, and Kru. However, a negative association was observed between NDF and ADF with Ca, Mg, and CF. Moreover, minerals indicated a positive correlation between NDF and ADF with Mn, K, P, and CP. A positive correlation was observed between ADL with Rut, Hyp, Try, and Que. In addition, a positive correlation was exhibited between ADL with Mn, K, P, and CP minerals. Nevertheless, a negative correlation was observed between Ca, Mg, Na, and CF.
Phenolic compounds in early and late harvested leaves are displayed in the stacked bar chart (Figure 1). All compounds (rutin, tryptophan, hyperoside, quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside, and kaempferol rutinoside) were displayed in both early and late harvested leaves, with clear indication of the abundance of rutin followed by kaempferol rutinoside, hyperoside, quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside, and tryptophan. However, early harvested leaves showed more content of all the compounds than late harvested leaves (Table 4; Figure 1).
Figure 2 is a loading plot of the phenolic compounds and their percentage contribution to the total variations in amaranth leaves. This confirms that early harvested leaves indeed contain more phenolic compounds, also as previously shown in Figure 1. Total variability among early and late harvested leaves was mainly due to variations in rutin, hyperoside, tryptophan, and kaempferol rutinoside (Figure 2; Table 6).
PCA of the phenolic compounds in amaranth grains had an eigenvalue of 20,961.1, which is more than 1 (Table 6). Eigenvalues that were more than 1 were seen as significant and component loadings that were larger than ±0.30 were considered meaningful. Based on this information, the results of this study confirm that variations among early and late harvested leaves were caused by a few flavonoids, mainly rutin, hyperoside, tryptophan, and kaempferol rutinoside.

4. Discussion

Leafy vegetables such as amaranth are promising crops for alleviating poverty and malnutrition in underdeveloped countries [25]. Therefore, understanding its detailed nutritional contents and phenolic compounds should be of outmost importance. Evaluating the agronomic characteristics such as the appropriate stage of harvest or maturity is equally important [16]. The present study presented high DM and CP in early harvested leaves as compared to late harvested leaves. This echoes the findings of Sarmadi et al. [26] and Ma et al. [16], who stated that as the amaranth plant reaches maturity, CP and DM contents decrease. The decrease in CP and DM of late harvested leaves is associated with an increase in structural components of plants as well as phenolic compounds. However, the CF content of late harvested leaves was slightly higher than of early harvested leaves; similar observations were reported by Ma et al. [16]. The increase in the CF contents of late harvested leaves might be due to an increase in lignin, hemicellulose and cellulose responsible for fibrous tissues that maintain plant structure as it grows [27,28]. Unpredictably, early harvested leaves showed higher NDF, ADF and ADL and GE than late harvested leaves. The outcomes of the current study are contrary to those of Abbasi et al. [29], Hue et al. [30], Ma et al. [16], and Sebola at al. [19], who found an increase in NDF and ADF as amaranth reaches its advance growth. The higher the NDF, ADF, ADL, and GE contents in this study were not expected because during the early growth stage, the plant has not reached its rigidity stage, which is supported by structural components rich in fibers such as NDF, ADF, and ADL and favorable amounts of GE. Moreover, late harvested leaves displayed high EE and starch contents than early harvested leaves. The results of the present study are contrary to the results of He and Corke [31] and Peiretti et al. [19], who observed higher contents of lipids in young leaves. However, high starch content in late harvested leaves was expected because starches are part of non-sugars that give the plant its rigidity, specifically at later stages of growth [31,32].
The findings of the present study further indicate that early harvested leaves can be used as a protein source in diets for growing children, whereas late harvested leaves can be included in diets for adults. The protein requirements in human diet range between 0.66 and 0.69 g/kg [3,33,34,35]. In the present study, early harvested amaranth leaves were able to supply these requirements.
In the current study, late harvested amaranth had higher concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and sodium than early harvested leaves. These findings concur with the reports of Modi [36], where calcium and magnesium are important constituents of bones and teeth, with their deficiency symptoms presenting in the form of rickets in children and osteomalacia in adult human beings [37]; whereas sodium is known to be a constituent of common salt and severs as osmotic regulation of body fluids [38]. Early harvested leaves exhibited high concentrations of phosphorus, potassium, copper, manganese, iron, and zinc than late harvested leaves. This was expected, since matured leaves have been reported to be rich in anti-nutritional factors known to decrease the bioavailability of minerals [39]. Thus, both early and late harvested leaves can be utilized for consumption, as they can supply the necessary requirements.
The results of the present study showed no variation in the histidine, tyrosine, and methionine contents of early and late harvested leaves, although early harvested leaves exhibited a slightly numerical increase in the above-mentioned amino acids. Early harvested leaves showed high arginine, threonine, lysine, and leucine contents, whereas late harvested leaves exhibited lower contents. Arginine, threonine, lysine, and leucine are essential amino acids that cannot be synthesized by the body and therefore must be supplied in the diet [40].
Late harvested leaves showed high valine, which is part of essential amino acids, contents compared to early harvested ones. Valine helps in repairing damaged tissues, regulating blood levels and promoting normal growth [41] Non-essential amino acids can be produced by humans even if they are not supplied in their diets. Early harvested leaves had higher serine, aspartic acid, glutamine, alanine, and proline contents than late harvested leaves. These values found in the present study were lower than the values reported by Akubugwo et al. [42]. This might be because their amaranth plant was grown in different climatic conditions. However, both early and late harvested leaves in this study showed appreciable amounts of both essential and non-essential amino acids.
Amaranth leaves are known to have high concentrations of phenolic compounds as the growth stage advances. However, in the present study, early harvested leaves showed significantly higher contents of rutin, hyperoside, tryptophan, quercetin, and kaempferol rutinoside when compared to late harvested leaves. Rutin, hyperoside, tryptophan, quercetin, and kaempferol rutinoside are flavonoids widely known to be the active phytochemical found in various vegetables and fruits [43,44]. There is growing evidence that these flavonoids can be used in human health with antioxidant, antiradical, estrogenic, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, anti-tumoral, anti-diabetic, and cytotoxic activities [45,46,47]. In the present study, high contents of these flavonoids in early harvested leaves were not expected because these are known to occur more in the stalks, upper parts of well-developed leaves, and sometimes as pigments in fruits [43]. The results of the present study agreed with the results of Karamać et al. [46], who reported high contents of phenolic compounds in young amaranth leaves. These authors stated that the reason why young leaves have higher phenolic compounds than matured leaves might be that they need these compounds for grain fill stages. Phenolic compounds are known to have antioxidant properties that help in preventing cancer, aging, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [7,8]. Thus, early harvested leaves can be suitable for human and livestock use compared to late harvested leaves.
A negative relationship between Ca, Mg, and Na with Rut, Hyp, Try, Que, and Kru was observed. This indicates that as Ca and Mg increase, phenolic compounds decrease. A strong positive relationship was observed between Mn, K and p and Rut, Hyp, Try, Que and Kru. Thus, as the level of Mn, K, and P increases, the level of Rut, Hyp, Try, Que, and Kru increases. This concurs with the report of Santos et al. [47], who stated that nutrient availability in plant leaves is related to levels of phenolic compounds present in plant tissues. These results show that flavonoid compound production is dependent on Mn, K, and P contents [45,46]. Moreover, Mn, K, and P are responsible for muscle construction, nerve signaling, and cellular enzyme activity [1,46]. The concentration of flavonoids depends on various factors such as environment, stage of growth, biotic and abiotic stresses, and genotype [47]. With regard to chemical composition, a positive relationship was observed between CP, NDF, ADF and Rut, Hyp, Try, Que and Kru. Thus, as CP, NDF, and ADF contents increase Ru, Hyp, Try, Que, and Kru contents also increase. This result showed that flavonoid compound production in plants also depends on the chemical composition of the plant [48,49]. However, a negative relationship was observed between CF and Ru, Hyp, Try, Que, and Kru. Thus, as CF contents increase, Rut, Hyp, Try, Que, and Kru contents decrease. This is good because if phenolic compounds are in excess quantities, they have the ability to decrease the bioavailability of nutrients to humans [21].
PCA of the phenolic compounds in amaranth leaves has an eigenvalue of more than 1. According to Hair et al. [50], eigenvalues that are more than 1 are seen as significant and component loadings that are larger than ±0.30 are considered meaningful. Based on this information, the results of this study confirmed that variations among early and late harvested leaves were caused by a few flavonoids, mainly rutin, hyperoside, tryptophan, and kaempferol krutinoside.

5. Conclusions

The results of the present study indicate that both early and late harvested leaves can be a good protein source for young children and adults. Moreover, late harvested leaves can be used as energy sources, since they displayed lower amounts of ADF, NDF, and ADL because they can easily be digested than early harvested leaves that have high contents of ADF, NDF, and ADL. Both early and late harvested leaves contain significant amounts of minerals and amino acids. Early harvested leaves can be recommended as a good source of phenolic acids to aid in fighting cardiovascular diseases in human beings. Conversely, the content of flavonoids (mainly rutin) increased with the growth cycle, and these compounds could be primarily responsible for the antioxidant activity of mature leaves. It is the finding of this study that both early and late harvested amaranth leaves are suitable for human consumption.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.; Writing—original draft preparation, T.G.M.; Review and editing, N.A.S. and M.M.; Visualization, N.A.S. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Research Foundation (grant number 118245) and the University of South Africa for the financial support.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank North West Department of Agriculture Taung Experimental Farm for supplying us with Amaranth cruentus and the CAF LCMS Lab, at the University of Stellenbosch for assistance in the LC-MS analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest was reported by the authors.

Abbreviations

AOACAssociation of Official Analytical Chemist
LSDLeast Significance Difference
LC-MSLiquid Chromatograph-Mass Spectrometer
QTDFA quadrupole time-of-flight
DMdry matter
CPcrude protein
CFcrude fiber
NDFneutral detergent fiber
ADFacid detergent fiber
ADLacid detergent lignin
GEgross energy
EEether extracts
Cacalcium
Mgmagnesium
Kpotassium
Nasodium
Pphosphorus
Rutrutin
Hyphyperoside
Trytryptophan
Quequercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside
Krukaempferol rutinoside

References

  1. Sarker, U.; Oba, S. Protein, dietary fiber, minerals, antioxidant pigments and phytochemicals and antioxidant activity in selected red morph Amaranthus leafy vegetable. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0222517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lynch, H.; Johnston, C.; Wharton, C. Plant-based diets: Considerations for environmental impact, protein quality, and exercise performance. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. World Health Organization. The United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders (ICCIDD) Assessment of Iodine Deficiency Disorders and Monitoring Their Elimination: A Guide for Programme Managers; WHO: Switzerland, Geneva, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jimoh, M.O.; Afolayan, A.J.; Lewu, F.B. Suitability of Amaranthus species for alleviating human dietary deficiencies. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 115, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Amaranthus Production Guidelines; Resource Centre, Directorate Agricultural Information Services: Pretoria, South Africa, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. Manyelo, T.G.; Sebola, N.A.; van Rensburg, E.J.; Mabelebele, M. The probable use of Genus amaranthus as feed material for monogastric animals. Animals 2020, 10, 1504. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jimenez-Aguilar, D.M.; Grusak, M.A. Minerals, vitamin C, phenolics, flavonoids and antioxidant activity of Amaranthus leafy vegetables. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2017, 58, 3–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Altemimi, A.; Lakhssassi, N.; Baharlouei, A.; Watson, D.G.; Lightfoot, D.A. Phytochemicals: Extraction, isolation, and identification of bioactive compounds from plant extracts. Plants 2017, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fasuyi, A.O.; Akindahunsi, A.O. Nutritional evaluation of Amaranthus cruentus leaf meal-based broiler diets supplemented with cellulase/glucanase/xylanase enzymes. Am. J. Food Technol. 2009, 4, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tagwira, M.; Tagwira, F.; Dugger, R.; Okum, B. Using grain amaranth to fight malnutrition. RUFORUM 2006, 1, 201–206. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fasuyi, A.O.; Dairo, F.A.S.; Adeniji, A.O. Protein supplementary quality of tropical vegetable (Amaranthus cruentus) leaf meal in broiler starter diets: Bio-nutritional evaluation. Int. J. Agric. 2007, 2, 976–986. [Google Scholar]
  12. Venskutonis, P.R.; Kraujalis, P. Nutritional components of amaranth seeds and vegetables: A review on composition, properties, and uses. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 381–412. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mamiro, P.S.; Mwanri, A.W.; Mongi, R.J.; Chivaghula, T.J.; Nyagaya, M.; Ntwenya, J. Effect of cooking on tannin and phytate content in different bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varieties grown in Tanzania. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 16, 1186–1191. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ahmed, M.; Abd El, T.; Mostafa, S.A.K. Utilization of polyethylene glycol and tannase enzyme to reduce the negative effect of tannins on digestibility, milk production and animal performance. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2018, 13, 201–209. [Google Scholar]
  15. Alemayehu, F.; Reta, M.A.; Bendevis, S.E.J. The potential for utilizing the seed crop amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) in East Africa as an alternative crop to support food security and climate change mitigation. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 2015, 201, 321–329. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ma, J.; Sun, G.; Shah, A.M.; Fan, X.; Li, S.; Yu, X. Effects of different growth stages of amaranth silage on the rumen degradation of dairy cows. Animals 2019, 9, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Contreras-Govea, F.E.; Muck, R.E.; Albrecht, K.A. Yield, nutritive value and silage fermentation of kura clover-reed canarygrass and lucerne herbages in northern USA. Grass Forage Sci. 2009, 64, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sebola, N.A.; Mlambo, V.; Mokoboki, H.K. Chemical characterisation of Moringa oleifera (MO) leaves and the apparent digestibility of MO leaf meal-based diets offered to three chicken strains. Agrofor. Syst. 2019, 93, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Peiretti, P.G.; Meineri, G.; Longato, E.; Tassone, S. Chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and fatty acid profile of Amaranthus caudatus herbage during its growth cycle. Anim. Nutr. Feed Technol. 2018, 18, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Soetan, K.; Oyewole, O.E. The need for adequate processing to reduce the anti-nutritional factors in plants used as human foods an animal feeds: A review. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2009, 3, 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  21. Agbaire, P.O. Levels of anti-nutritional factors in some common leafy edible vegetables of southern Nigeria. Afr. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 3, 99–101. [Google Scholar]
  22. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Official Methods of Analysis, 19th ed.; AOAC International: Rockville, MD, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, and neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar]
  24. Statistical Analysis Software. SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, 9th ed.; SAS Institute, Inc.: Raleigh, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  25. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Annual Report; Resource Centre, Directorate Agricultural Information Services: Pretoria, South Africa, 2017.
  26. Sarmadi, B.; Rouzbehan, Y.; Rezaei, J. Influences of growth stage and nitrogen fertilizer on chemical composition, phenolics, in situ degradability and in vitro ruminal variables in amaranth forage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016, 215, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahmed, K.; Shaheen, M.; Mirzaei, F.; Khan, Z.I.; Gondal, S.; Fardous, A.; Hussain, A.; Arshad, F.; Mehmood, T. Proximate analysis: Relative feed values of various forage plants for ruminants investigated in semi-arid region of Punjab, Pakistan. J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 4, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Le Gall, H.; Philippe, F.; Domon, J.M.; Gillet, F.; Pelloux, J.; Rayon, C. Cell wall metabolism in response to abiotic stress. Plants 2015, 4, 112–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Abbasi, D.; Rouzbehan, Y.; Rezaei, J. Effect of harvest date and nitrogen fertilization. J. Sci. Technol. 2012, 171, 6–13. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hue, K.T.; Thanh Van, D.; Ledin, I.; Wredle, E.; Spörndly, E. Effect of harvesting frequency, variety and leaf maturity on nutrient composition, hydrogen cyanide content and cassava foliage yield. Asian Austral. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 25, 1691–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. He, H.P.; Corke, H. Oil and squalene in Amaranthus grain and leaf. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 51, 7913–7920. [Google Scholar]
  32. Alcázar-Alay, S.C.; Meireles, M.A.A. Physicochemical properties, modifications and applications of starches from different botanical sources. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 35, 215–236. [Google Scholar]
  33. Klasing, K.C. Nutritional Requirements of Poultry. In MSD Veterinary Manual; University of California: Oakland, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  34. Herdt, T.H. Nutritional Requirements of Ruminant. In MSD Veterinary Manual; Michigan State University: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  35. Michael, E. Differences between an Acid Detergent Fiber and a Neutral Detergent Fiber. Sciencing.com. 2017. Available online: https://sciencing.com/differences-fiber-neutral-detergent-fiber-8723938.html (accessed on 16 July 2020).
  36. Modi, A.T. Growth temperature and plant age influence on nutritional quality of Amaranthus leaves and seed germination capacity. Water SA 2006, 33, 369–376. [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, X.; Zhang, D.; Bryden, W.L. Calcium and phosphorus metabolism and nutrition of poultry: Are current diets formulated in excess? Anim. Prod. Sci. 2017, 57, 2304–2310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baloš, M.; Jakšić, S.; Knežević, S.; Miloš, K. Electrolytes—Sodium, potassium and chlorides in poultry nutrition elektroliti—Natrijum, kalijum i hloridi u ishrani živine. Arch. Vet. Med. 2016, 9, 1820–9955. [Google Scholar]
  39. Kaushik, G.; Singhal, P.; Chaturvedi, S. Food Processing for Increasing Consumption: The Case of Legumes. 2018. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/book/378677055/Food-Processing-for-Increased-Quality-and-Consumption (accessed on 23 June 2020).
  40. Birmani, M.W.; Raza, A.; Nawab, A.; Tang, S.; Ghani, M.W.; Li, G.; Xiao, M.; An, L. Importance of arginine as immune regulator in animal nutrition. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Res. 2019, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, S.; Zeng, X.; Ren, M.; Mao, X.; Qiao, S. Novel metabolic and physiological functions of branched chain amino acids: A review. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 8, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Akubugwo, I.E.; Obasi, N.A.; Chinyere, G.C.; Ugbogu, A.E. Nutritional and chemical value of Amaranthus hybridus L. leaves from Afikpo, Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6, 2833–2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Shields, M. Pharmacognosy: Fundamentals, Applications and Strategies; Elsevier: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2017; pp. 295–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kanika, P.; Patel, K.D. The beneficial role of rutin: A naturally occurring flavonoid in health promotion and disease prevention: A systematic review and update. In Bioactive Food as Dietary Interventions for Arthritis and Related Inflammatory Diseases, 2nd ed.; Elsevier: Allahabad, India, 2019; pp. 457–479. [Google Scholar]
  45. Muhammet, A.; Adhithiya, C.; Huajun, J.; Vellareddy, A.; Kanthasamy, A.; Anumantha, G.K. Chapter 32—Quercetin. In Nutraceuticals: Efficacy, Safety and Toxicity; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 447–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Karamać, M.; Gai, F.; Longato, E.; Meineri, G.; Janiak, M.A.; Amarowicz, R.; Peiretti, P.G. Antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of amaranth (Amaranthus caudatus) during plant growth. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Santos, R.M.F.; Gilmara, A.; Ferri, C.; Pedro, H.; Santos, S.C. Influence of foliar nutrients on phenol levels in leaves of Eugenia uniflora. Rev. Bras. Farmacogn. 2011, 21, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qin, G.; Yan, C.; Lu, H. Influence of heave metals on the carbohydrate and phenolics in mangrove, Aegiceras corniculatum L., seedlings. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2007, 78, 440–444. [Google Scholar]
  49. Pandino, G.; Courts, F.L.; Lombardo, S.; Mauromicale, G.; Williamson, G. Caffeoylquinic acids and flavonoid in the immature inflorescence of globe artichoke, wild cardoon, and cultivated cardoon. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 1026–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hair, J.F.; Andrson, J.R.; Tatham, R.E.; Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed.; Prentice-Hall International, Inc.: London, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
Agriculture 10 00432 g001 550
Figure 1. Stacked bar graph of the phenolic compounds (mg/kg) present in amaranth leaves (LHL: late harvested leaves; EHL: early harvested leaves). Rut: rutin, Hyp: hyperoside, Try: tryptophan. Que: quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside, Kru: kaempferol rutinoside.
Figure 1. Stacked bar graph of the phenolic compounds (mg/kg) present in amaranth leaves (LHL: late harvested leaves; EHL: early harvested leaves). Rut: rutin, Hyp: hyperoside, Try: tryptophan. Que: quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside, Kru: kaempferol rutinoside.
Agriculture 10 00432 g001
Agriculture 10 00432 g002 550
Figure 2. Loadings plot of the phenolic compounds and their percentage (%) contribution to the total variations in amaranth leaves. Rut: rutin, Hyp: hyperoside, Try: tryptophan. Que: quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside, Kru: kaempferol rutinoside.
Figure 2. Loadings plot of the phenolic compounds and their percentage (%) contribution to the total variations in amaranth leaves. Rut: rutin, Hyp: hyperoside, Try: tryptophan. Que: quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside, Kru: kaempferol rutinoside.
Agriculture 10 00432 g002
Table
Table 1. Proximate analysis composition of early and late harvested amaranth leaves (g/100 g).
Table 1. Proximate analysis composition of early and late harvested amaranth leaves (g/100 g).
NutrientStage of HarvestingProbability
EHLLHL
DM92.65 a ± 0.7391.38 b ± 0.720.0031
CP23.23 a ± 3.9116.46 b ± 0.710.0001
CF17.14 b ± 0.3517.74 a ± 0.360.0136
NDF15.40 a ± 0.07114.45 b ± 0.0710.0055
ADF7.14 a ± 0.316.61 b ± 0.300.0173
ADL1.95 a ± 0.351.35 b ± 0.340.0136
GE14.50 a ± 1.1912.44 b ± 1.180.0012
EE1.12 b ± 0.241.52 a ± 0.260.0299
Starch0.38 b ± 0.431.11 a ± 0.450.0093
Ash21.18 a ± 2.0117.70 b ± 1.990.0004
The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). a,b: Means followed by the same superscript in a row are not significantly different (p > 0.05). EHL: Early harvested leaves; LHL: Late harvested leaves.
Table
Table 2. Mineral composition of early and late harvested amaranth leaves (mg/kg).
Table 2. Mineral composition of early and late harvested amaranth leaves (mg/kg).
NutrientStage of HarvestingProbability
EHLLHL
Calcium43,287 b ± 0.7456,000 a ± 0.0750.0001
Phosphorus2044.93 a ± 0.061371.30 b ± 0.070.0001
Magnesium15,295 b ± 0.3020,350 a ± 0.310.0001
Potassium14,995 a ± 0.1312,950 b ± 0.110.0001
Sodium287.87 b ± 0.02428.21 a ± 0.030.0001
Copper8.95 a ± 0.0713.45 b ± 0.0710.0002
Manganese583.28 a ± 0.04335.95 b ± 0.020.0001
Iron372.34 a ± 0.03279.95 b ± 0.020.0001
Zinc42.44 a ± 0.0729.95 b ± 0.050.0001
The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). a,b: Means followed by the same superscript in a row are not significantly different (p > 0.05). EHL: Early harvested leaves; LHL: Late harvested leaves.
Table
Table 3. Amino acid composition of early and late harvested amaranth leaves (g/100 g crude protein, CP).
Table 3. Amino acid composition of early and late harvested amaranth leaves (g/100 g crude protein, CP).
Stage of HarvestingProbability
EHLLHL
Essential Amino Acids
Histidine0.29 a ± 0.070.22 a ± 0.060.541
Arginine0.90 a ± 0.190.59 b ± 0.180.033
Threonine0.85 a ± 0.060.58 b ± 0.070.035
Lysine1.73 a ± 0.291.23 b ± 0.270.007
Tyrosine0.52 a ± 0.130.35 a ± 0.140.289
Methionine0.34 a ± 0.080.24 a ± 0.070.271
Valine1.51 b ± 0.191.84 a ± 0.180.008
Leucine1.55 a ± 0.281.07 b ± 0.270.011
Non-Essential Amino Acids
Serine0.90 a ± 0.180.60 b ± 0.170.026
Glycine0.94 a ± 0.130.73 a ± 0.110.116
Aspartic acid2.16 a ± 0.471.36 b ± 0.460.003
Glutamine2.94 a ± 0.671.78 b ± 0.650.001
Alanine1.27 a ± 0.210.92 b ± 0.230.027
Proline0.87 a ± 0.160.62 b ± 0.150.054
Isoleucine0.83 a ± 0.130.57 a ± 0.100.064
Phenylalanine0.66 a ± 0.110.49 a ± 0.090.120
The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). a,b: Means followed by the same superscript in a row are not significantly different (p > 0.05). EHL: Early harvested leaves; LHL: Late harvested leaves.
Table
Table 4. Phenolic compounds of early and late harvested amaranth leaves (mg/kg).
Table 4. Phenolic compounds of early and late harvested amaranth leaves (mg/kg).
Phenolic CompoundStage of HarvestingProbability
EHLLHL
Rutin1222.79 a ± 104.421041.92 b ± 104.400.0001
Hyperoside206.45 a ± 43.84130.52 b ± 43.830.0001
Tryptophan87.77 a ± 28.9537.62 b ± 28.930.0001
Quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside79.31 a ± 3.6673.03 b ± 3.640.0001
Kaempferol rutinoside188.80 a ± 14.89164.00 b ± 14.860.0001
The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 4). a,b: Means followed by the same superscript in a row are not significantly different (p > 0.05). EHL: Early harvested leaves; LHL: Late harvested leaves.
Table
Table 5. Pearson correlation matrix for phenolic compounds and macro-minerals and chemical composition of amaranth leaves.
Table 5. Pearson correlation matrix for phenolic compounds and macro-minerals and chemical composition of amaranth leaves.
RutHypTryQueKruCaMgMnKNaPCPCFNDFADFADL
Rut1
Hyp1 ***1
Try1 ***1 ***1
Que1 ***1 ***1 ***1
Kru0.962 *0.962 *0.962 *0.962 *1
Ca−1 ***−1 ***−1 ***−1 ***−0.96 *1
Mg−1 ***−1 ***−1 ***−1 ***−0.96 *1 ***1
Mn1 ***1 ***1 ***1 ***0.962 *−1 ***−1 ***1
K1 ***1 ***1 ***1 ***0.962 *−1 ***−1 ***1 ***1
Na−1 ***−1 ***−1 ***−1 ***−0.96 *1 ***1 ***−1 ***−1 ***1
P1 ***1 ***1 ***1 ***0.962 *−1 ***−1 ***1 ***1 ***−1 ***1
CP1 ***1 ***1 ***1 ***0.964 *−1 ***−1 ***1 ***1 ***−1 ***1 ***1
CF−0.99 **−0.99 **−0.99 **−0.99 **−0.920.986 **0.986 **−0.99 **−0.99 **0.987 **−0.99 **−0.98 *1
NDF0.995 **0.995 **0.995 **0.995 **0.977 *−0.99 **−0.99 **0.995 **0.995 **−0.99 **0.995 *0.996 **−0.96 *1
ADF0.983 *0.983 *0.983 *0.983 *0.981 *−0.98 *−0.98 *0.983 *0.983 *−0.98 *0.983 *0.985 *−0.940.997 **1
ADL0.986 **0.986 **0.986 **0.987 **0.98−0.99 **−0.99 **0.986 **0.986 **−0.99 **0.986 **0.989 **−0.95 *0.998 **11
Ca: calcium, Mg: magnesium, K: potassium, Na: sodium, P: phosphorus, Rut: rutin, Hyp: hyperoside, Try: typtophan, Que: quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-glucoside, Kru: kaempferol rutinoside. * indicate a significant correlation (p < 0.05); ** indicate a highly significant correlation (p < 0.01) *** indicate a very highly significant correlation (p < 0.001).
Table
Table 6. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the phenolic compounds showing their percentage contribution to the total variations.
Table 6. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the phenolic compounds showing their percentage contribution to the total variations.
Principal Component 1 (PC 1)
Rutin0.883360
Hyperoside0.370870
Tryptophan0.244940
Quercetin 3-O-rhamnosyl-rhamnosyl-glucoside0.030672
Kaempferol rutinoside0.145560
Eigenvalue
% variance		20961.1
Cumulative %100

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Manyelo, T.G.; Sebola, N.A.; Mabelebele, M. Nutritional and Phenolic Profile of Early and Late Harvested Amaranth Leaves Grown Under Cultivated Conditions. Agriculture 2020, 10, 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10100432

AMA Style

Manyelo TG, Sebola NA, Mabelebele M. Nutritional and Phenolic Profile of Early and Late Harvested Amaranth Leaves Grown Under Cultivated Conditions. Agriculture. 2020; 10(10):432. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10100432

Chicago/Turabian Style

Manyelo, Tlou Grace, Nthabiseng Amenda Sebola, and Monnye Mabelebele. 2020. "Nutritional and Phenolic Profile of Early and Late Harvested Amaranth Leaves Grown Under Cultivated Conditions" Agriculture 10, no. 10: 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10100432

APA Style

Manyelo, T. G., Sebola, N. A., & Mabelebele, M. (2020). Nutritional and Phenolic Profile of Early and Late Harvested Amaranth Leaves Grown Under Cultivated Conditions. Agriculture, 10(10), 432. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10100432

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop