Exploring the Preferences of Consumers’ Organic Products in Aspects of Sustainable Consumption: The Case of the Polish Consumer
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Contributions
2.1. Consumer Environmental Awareness and Consumer Behavior towards Organic Products—Literature Review
- the level of their knowledge about environmental protection and related social responsibility,
- the rationalization of consumption, along with a shift from proquantitative to proqualitative consumption,
- the reduction of the consumption of goods whose production involves nonrenewable natural resources and generates hazardous waste,
- paying attention to corporate social responsibility, and
- the growing popularity of goods and services promoted using socially engaged marketing.
2.2. The Role of Research Consumer Behavior towards Organic Products
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study Design
- b0—constant,
- βi—model parameter (of regression factors) describing the effect of the ith variable,
- β1,···, βk—partial regression factors,
- x1,···, xk—variables examined, and
- ε—random component (Se).
3.2. Sample Description
4. Results
5. Discussion
Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, C.; Ghadimi, P.; Lim, M.; Tseng, M. A literature review of sustainable consumption and production: A comparative analysis in developed and developing economies. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 206, 741–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jerzak, M.A.; Śmiglak-Krajewska, M. Globalization of the market for vegetable protein feed and its impact on sustainable agricultural development and food security in EU countries illustrated by the example of Poland. Sustainability 2020, 12, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- FAO/UNEP. Sustainable Food Systems Program, FAO/UNEP. 2011. Available online: www.fao.org/ag/ags/sustainable-food-consumption-and-production/en/ (accessed on 22 December 2020).
- FAO/UNEP. Sustainable Consumption Driver of the Green Economy, Working Paper in Improving Food Systems for Sustainable Diets in a Green Economy; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2012; pp. 25–37. Available online: www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ags/docs/SFCP/WorkingPaper4.pdf (accessed on 22 December 2020).
- European Commission—Environment. Sustainable Foods, European Commission—Environment. 2016. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/eussd/food.htm (accessed on 22 December 2020).
- Minton, E.; Spielmann, N.; Kahle, L.; Kim, C. The subjective norms of sustainable consumption: A cross-cultural exploration. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 82, 400–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bywalec, C. Nowe zjawiska i tendencje w konsumpcji społeczeństw wysoko rozwiniętych. Ekonomista 2001, 3, 375–392. [Google Scholar]
- Young, W.; Hwang, K.; McDonald, S.; Oates, C. Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 18, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, A.; Oates, C.; Young, W. A conceptual framework of the adoption and practice of environmental actions in households. Sustainability 2015, 7, 5793–5818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Grunert, K.G.; Hieke, S.; Wills, J. Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy 2014, 44, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Verplanken, B.; Roy, D. Consumer habits and sustainable consumption. In Handbook of Research on Sustainable Consumption; Reisch, L.A., Thøgersen, J., Eds.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK, 2015; pp. 243–253. [Google Scholar]
- Vandecandelaere, E. Geographical Indication as a Tool for Sustainable Food Systems: Importance of a Territorial Approach. 2014. Available online: www.fao.org/3/a-i3421e.pdf (accessed on 23 December 2020).
- Witte, K.; Cameron, K.A.; McKeon, J.K.; Berkowitz, J.M. Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. J. Health Commun. 1996, 1, 317–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berger, I.E.; Corbin, R.M. Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. J. Public Policy Mark. 1992, 11, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barska, A. Attitudes of young consumers towards innovations on the food market. Management 2014, 18, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Barska, A.; Wojciechowska-Solis, J. E-consumers and local food products: A perspective for developing online shopping for local goods in Poland. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziewanowska, K.; Kacprzak, A. Ekologiczna konsumpcja na pokaz. Analiza społecznych i marketingowych skutków kreowania “eko-ikon”. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Szczecińskiego. Probl. ZarządzaniaFinans. Mark. 2013, 32, 39–54. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, L.; Prybutok, V.; Blankson, C. An environmental awareness purchasing intention model. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2019, 119, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, S.; Qin, Y.; Zeng, G. Impact of corporate environmental responsibility on investment efficiency: The moderating roles of the institutional environment and consumer environmental awareness. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boztepe, A. Green marketing and its impact on consumer buying behavior. Eur. J. Econ. Political Stud. 2012, 5, 5–21. [Google Scholar]
- Lončar, D.; Paunković, J.; Jovanović, V.; Krstić, V. Environmental and social responsibility of companies cross EU countries–Panel data analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 657, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Vedlitz, A.; Shi, L. Examining the determinants of public environmental concern: Evidence from national public surveys. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 39, 77–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bener, Ö.; Babaoğul, M. Sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışı ve çevre bilinci oluşturmada bir araç olarak tüketici eğitimi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyolojik Araştırmalar Dergisi 2008, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Kardos, M.; Gabor, M.R.; Cristache, N. Green marketingFs roles in sustainability and ecopreneurship. Case study: Green packaging’s impact on Romanian young consumers’ environmental responsibility. Sustainability 2019, 11, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mańkowska-Wróbel, L. Ekologiczne uwarunkowania zachowań konsumenckich. Handel Wewnętrzny 2015, 354, 141–150. [Google Scholar]
- Szczepanek, M.; Prus, P.; Knapowski, T. The assessment of market demand for products obtained from primary wheat forms with increased nutritional value. Agrarian perspectives XXVII. Food safety–Food security. In Proceedings of the 27th International Scientific Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, 19–20 September 2018; pp. 381–387. [Google Scholar]
- Raport Ministerstwa Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi. Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/polskapomoc/raport-roczny-2017 (accessed on 10 December 2020).
- Soroka, A.; Wojciechowska-Solis, J. Consumer motivation to buy organic food depends on lifestyle. Foods 2019, 8, 581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bryła, P. The role of appeals to tradition in origin food marketing. A survey among Polish consumers. Appetite 2016, 91, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muhammad, S.; Fathelrahman, E.; Tasbih Ullah, R.U. The significance of consumer’s awareness about organic food products in the United Arab Emirates. Sustainability 2016, 8, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Popa, I.D.; Dabija, D.C. Developing the Romanian organic market: A producer’s perspective. Sustainability 2019, 11, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ekologiczna Świadomość Polaków, CBOP, Warszawa 2000; Polacy o Stanie Środowiska i Zmianach Klimatu, CBOS, Warszawa 2010 Oraz Zachowania Proekologiczne Polaków, CBOS, Warszawa 2011. Available online: http://wneiz.pl/nauka_wneiz/sip/sip42-2015/SiP-42-t2-35.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2021).
- Badanie Świadomości i Zachowań Ekologicznych Mieszkańców Polski, Raport TNS Polska dla Ministra Środowiska, Warszawa 2012. Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/srodowisko/badania-swiadomosci-ekologicznej (accessed on 25 January 2021).
- Patrzałek, W. Znaczenie świadomości ekologicznej w zachowaniach konsumenckich. Pr. Nauk. Uniw. Ekon. We Wrocławiu 2017, 501, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szalonka, K.; Światowy, G.; Witek, L. O dylematach pomiaru prozdrowotnego stylu życia w kontekście badań marketingowych. Res. Pap. Wroc. Univ. Econ. Pr. Nauk. Uniw. Ekon. We Wroc. 2016, 460, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
- Szalonka, K.; Światowy, G.; Witek, L. Prozdrowotna konsumpcja w kształtowaniu zrównoważonego rozwoju. Konsumpcja Rozw. 2017, 4, 98–109. [Google Scholar]
- Kryk, B. Zrównoważona jakość życia a zrównoważona konsumpcja i zachowania ekologiczne polskich konsumentów. Handel Wewnętrzny 2013, 2, 6–20. [Google Scholar]
- Łuczka-Bakuła, W. Rynek Żywności Ekologicznej; PWE: Warszawa, Poland, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Borusiak, B.; Szymkowiak, A.; Horska, E.; Raszka, N.; Żelichowska, E. Towards building sustainable consumption: A study of second-hand buying intentions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nestorowicz, R. Oznakowanie produktów żywnościowych a zrównoważona konsumpcja. J. Agribus. Rural Dev. 2015, 3, 487–493. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.; Xiong, J.; Li, H.; Wu, H. The myth of retail pricing policy for developing organic vegetable markets. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 52, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radzymińska, M.; Jakubowska, D.; Siemianowska, E. Attitudes of young consumers towards ecological bakery and confectionary food products—A case study. Probl. Rol. Światowego 2018, 18, 238–248. [Google Scholar]
- Wojciechowska-Solis, J.; Soroka, A. Motives and barriers of organic food demand among Polish consumers: A profile of the purchasers. Br. Food J. 2017, 119, 2040–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosona, T.; Gebresenbet, G. Swedish consumers’ perception of food quality and sustainability in relation to organic food production. Foods 2018, 7, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Nagy-Pércsi, K.; Fogarassy, C. Important influencing and decision factors in organic food purchasing in Hungary. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smoluk-Sikorska, J.; Malinowski, M.; Łuczka, W. Identification of the conditions for organic agriculture development in polish districts—An implementation of canonical analysis. Agriculture 2020, 10, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matuszczak, A. Zróżnicowanie Rozwoju Rolnictwa w Regionach Unii Europejskiej w Aspekcie Jego Zrównoważenia; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Barska, A.; Jędrzejczak-Gas, J. Indicator analysis of the economic development of Polish regions in the context of the implementation of the concept of sustainable development. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 8, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kalinowski, S. Poziom Życia Ludności Wiejskiej O Niepewnych Dochodach; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Poznań, Poland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Reisch, L.; Eberle, U.; Lorek, S. Sustainable food consumption: An overview of contemporary issues and Policy. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2013, 9, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagiaslis, A.; Krontalis, A. Green consumption behavior antecedents: Environmental concern, knowledge and beliefs. Psychol. Mark. 2014, 31, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FIBL Statistics—European and Global Organic Farming Statistics. Available online: https://statistics.fibl.org (accessed on 26 January 2021).
- Rusnak, J. Doradztwo Rolnicze. Rolnictwo Ekologiczne. Available online: http://www.modr.pl (accessed on 17 February 2020).
- Mazurek-Łopacińska, K.; Sobocińska, M. Nowe spojrzenie na konsumenta jako uczestnika życia gospodarczego. Handel Wewnętrzny 2014, 4, 189–201. [Google Scholar]
- Barska, A.; Wojciechowska-Solis, J. Traditional and regional food as seen by consumers–Research results: The case of Poland. Br. Food J. 2018, 120, 1994–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonides, G.; van Raaij, F. Zachowanie Konsumenta. Podręcznik Akademicki; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Maciejewski, G. Perceived risk in purchasing decisions of the Polish consumers–Model-based approach. J. Econ. Manag. 2012, 8, 37–52. [Google Scholar]
- Stewart-Knox, B.; Mitchell, P. What separates the winners from the losers in new food product development? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2003, 14, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mączyńska, E.; Sójka, J. (Eds.) Etyka i Ekonomia. W Stronę Nowego Paradygmatu; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PTE: Warszawa, Poland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kołodko, G.W. The New Pragmatism, or economics and policy for the future: (An essay). Acta Oeconomica. 2014, 64, 139–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thaler, R.; Sunstein, C. Impuls. Jak Podejmować Właściwe Decyzje Dotyczące Zdrowia, Dobrobytu i Szczęścia; Zysk i S-ka: Poznań, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Borys, T. O dwóch komplementarnych ujęciach nowego paradygmatu konsumpcji. Rozwój trwały i zrównoważony. Prace Naukowe UE Wrocławiu 2016, 452, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
- Sagan, A. Modele strukturalne w analizie zachowań konsumenta-ewolucja podejść. Konsumpcja Rozw. 2011, 1, 67–76. [Google Scholar]
- Hinton, P.R.; McMurray, I.; Brownlow, C. SPSS Explained; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Rabiej, M. Statystyka z Programem Statistica; Helion: Gliwice, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen, T.N.; Lobo, A.; Nguyen, H.L.; Phan, T.T.H.; Cao, T.K. Determinants influencing conservation behaviour: Perceptions of vietnamese consumers. J. Consum. Behav. 2016, 15, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunlap, R.; Jones, R. Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In Handbook of Environmental Sociology; Dunlap, R.E., Michelson, W., Eds.; Greenwook Press: London, UK, 2012; pp. 482–542. [Google Scholar]
- Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Population, Size and Structure by Territorial Division. Available online: www.demografia.stat.gov.pl (accessed on 10 May 2020).
- Ehrenberg, A. Repeat Buying: Theory and Applications; Charles-Griffin: London, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Turra, C.; Ghisi Nielsen, F.A.; De Freitas Vian, C.E.; Moreira, C.F.; Ferrarezi, A.C. The Brazilian consumer’s profile and perceptron of organic foods: A review. Glob. Adv. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 2015, 4, 775–783. [Google Scholar]
- Ramesh, S.V.; Divya, M. A study on consumers’ awareness attitude and satisfaction towards select organic food products with reference to Coimbatore. Int. J. Interdiscip. Multidiscip. Stud. 2015, 2, 81–84. [Google Scholar]
- Toit, L.; Crafford, S. Beliefs and purchaising practices of Cape Town consumers regarding organically produced food. J. Fam. Ecol. Consum. Sci. 2003, 31, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Drexler, D.; Fiala, A.; Havlíčková, A.; Potůčková, A.; Souček, M. The effect of organic food labels on consumer attention. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2018, 24, 441–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torjusen, H.; Lieblien, G.; Wandel, M.; Francis, C.A. Food system orientation and quality perceptron among consumer and producers of organic food In Hedmark County Norway. Food Qual. Prefer. 2001, 12, 201–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, N.; Johnson, L.W. Consumer behaviour and environmental sustainability. J. Consum. Behav. 2020, 19, 539–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laureati, M.; Jabes, D.; Russo, V.; Pagliarini, E. Sustainability and organic production: How information influences consumer’s expectation and preference for yogurt. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 30, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scalvedi, M.L.; Saba, A. Exploring local and organic food consumption in a holistic sustainability view. Br. Food J. 2018, 120, 749–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Żakowska-Biemans, S. Polish consumer food choices and beliefs about organic food. Br. Food J. 2011, 113, 122–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Żakowska-Biemans, S.; Gutkowska, K. Rynek Żywności Ekologicznej w Polsce i w Krajach Unii Europejskiej; Wydawnictwo SGGW: Warszawa, Poland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Naspetti, S.; Bodini, A. Consumer perception of local and organic products: Substitution or complementary goods? Int. J. Interdiscip. Soc. Sci. 2008, 3, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dominick, S.R.; Fullerton, C.H.; Widmar, N.J.O.; Wang, H. Consumer associations with the “All Natural” food label. J. Food Prod. Mark. 2018, 24, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wyrwa, J.; Barska, A. Packaging as a source of information about food products. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM2016), Bialystok, Poland, 21–23 September 2016; p. 103. [Google Scholar]
- Prentice, C.; Chen, J.; Wang, X. The influence of product and personal attributes on organic food marketing. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 46, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dawes, J.G. Testing the robustness of brand partitions identified from purchase duplication analysis. J. Mark. Manag. 2016, 32, 695–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lees, G.; Wright, M. Does the duplication of viewing law apply to radio listening? Eur. J. Mark. 2013, 47, 674–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bryła, P. Organic food online shopping in Poland. Br. Food J. 2018, 120, 1015–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamzaoui Essoussi, L.; Zahaf, M. Exploring the decision-making process of Canadian organic food consumers: Motivations and trust issues. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 2009, 12, 443–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zepeda, L.; Deal, D. Organic and local food consumer behaviour: Alphabet theory. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2009, 33, 697–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adams, D.C.; Salois, M.J. Local versus organic: A turn in consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2010, 25, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schjøll, A. Country-of-origin preferences for organic food. Org. Agric. 2017, 7, 315–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azzurra, A.; Agovino, M.; Mariani, A. Measuring sustainable food consumption: A case study on organic food. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 17, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monier-Dilhan, S.; Bergès, F. Consumers’ motivations driving organic demand: Between self-interest and sustainability. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2016, 45, 522–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hjelmar, U. Consumers’ purchase of organic food products. A matter of convenience and reflexive practices. Appetite 2011, 56, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shashi, S.Y.; Singh, R. A review of sustainability, deterrents, personal values, attitudes and purchase intentions in the organic food supply chain. Pac. Sci. Rev. B: Hum. Soc. Sci. 2015, 1, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Padilla-Bravo, C.; Cordts, A.; Schulze, B.; Spiller, A. Assessing determinants of organic food consumption using data from the German national nutrition survey II. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 28, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, J.; Paul, J. Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 38, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, R.D. Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The moderating effects of organic food prices. Br. Food J. 2016, 118, 183–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Đorđević, Đ.; Buchtova, H. Factors influencing sushi meal as representative of non-traditional meal: Consumption among Czech consumers. Acta Aliment. 2017, 46, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Konuk, F.A. The influence of perceived food quality, price fairness, perceived value and satisfaction on customers’ revisit and word-of-mouth intentions towards organic food restaurants. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 50, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Loo, E.J.; Diem, M.N.H.; Pieniak, Z.; Verbeke, W. Consumer attitudes, knowledge, and consumption of organic yogurt. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 2118–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemmerling, S.; Hamm, U.; Spiller, A. Consumption behaviour regarding organic food from a marketing perspective—A literature review. Org. Agric. 2015, 5, 277–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Magnusson, M.K.; Arvola, A.; Hursti, U.K.K.; Åberg, L.; Sjodén, P.O. Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite 2003, 40, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annunziata, A.; Vecchio, R. Organic farming and sustainability in food choices: An analysis of consumer preference in Southern Italy. Agric. Sci. Proc. 2016, 8, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Śmiglak-Krajewska, M.; Wojciechowska-Solis, J.; Viti, D. Consumers’ purchasing intentions on the legume market as evidence of sustainable behaviour. Agriculture 2020, 10, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aprile, M.C.; Mariani, A. Young people’s propensity to use sustainability labels on food products: A case study in the south of Italy. Qual. Access Success 2015, 16, 75–79. [Google Scholar]
- Wasiluk, A. Rozwój przedsiębiorstw handlu elektronicznego w Polsce. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie 2014, 15, 459–471. [Google Scholar]
Variable | Category | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 509 | 47.70 |
Female | 558 | 52.30 | |
Age | <25 | 312 | 29.24 |
26–40 | 238 | 22.27 | |
41–55 | 299 | 28.02 | |
>56 | 218 | 20.47 | |
Place of residence | Rural areas (rural communes) | 420 | 39.40 |
Cities of up to 30,000 inhabitants (urban–rural communes) | 192 | 18.00 | |
Cities more than 30,000 inhabitants (cities) | 455 | 42.60 | |
Level of formal education | Primary | 341 | 32.00 |
Secondary | 393 | 36.80 | |
University | 333 | 31.20 |
Decision Variables | Mean | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|
Price | 3.511 | 1.269 |
High quality | 3.690 | 1.257 |
Advertising | 3.376 | 1.226 |
Country of origin | 3.716 | 1.315 |
Brand | 3.230 | 1.128 |
Labels/certificate of origin | 3.573 | 1.131 |
No additives | 3.904 | 1.181 |
Content of nutrients | 4.035 | 1.181 |
No E-numbers | 3.638 | 1.223 |
Taste | 3.739 | 1.232 |
Appearance | 3.231 | 1.298 |
Freshness | 3.562 | 1.197 |
Friends’ recommendation | 3.244 | 1.226 |
Family home habit | 2.746 | 1.385 |
Health benefits | 4.035 | 1.181 |
Purchase Channel | Total | A. | B. | C. | D. | E. | F. | G. | H. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. On the farmer’s organic farm | 20.32 | 20.58 | 51.60 | 18.22 | 46.88 | 48.56 | 22.42 | 6.78 | |
B. Producers’ Stores | 14.86 | 22.88 | 36.12 | 32.56 | 36.14 | 34.28 | 28.46 | 8.60 | |
C. Markets, bazaars | 35.20 | 34.46 | 19.12 | 32.60 | 34.22 | 42.18 | 29.16 | 6.82 | |
D. Fairs, stalls | 25.62 | 26.44 | 27.62 | 38.98 | 48.86 | 47.46 | 20.37 | 4.28 | |
E. Festivals of organic producers | 32.75 | 32.16 | 26.48 | 48.28 | 48.46 | 38.38 | 22.48 | 5.38 | |
F. Specialized Organic Stores | 42.28 | 24.12 | 32.46 | 36.48 | 30.78 | 29.88 | 16.96 | 12.44 | |
G. Large distribution networks | 28.60 | 20.14 | 18.16 | 19.14 | 16.18 | 12.14 | 38.68 | 8.46 | |
H. Internet | 15.34 | 22.06 | 24.18 | 42.86 | 24.28 | 16.46 | 32.14 | 12.18 | |
Average Duplication | 26.03 | 24.09 | 39.21 | 29.01 | 32.08 | 39.91 | 21.72 | 7.54 |
Factors | Estimate β | Standard Error | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Care for the environment and animal welfare (A) | 0.115 | 0.025 | 0.002 * |
Production is not harmful to the environment (B) | 0.196 | 0.022 | <0.001 * |
Low level of processing, short shelf life (C) | 0.249 | 0.023 | <0.001 * |
It is produced without the use of artificial fertilizers, chemical pesticides and antibiotics (D) | 0.218 | 0.018 | <0.001 * |
F–statistic of the model | F(11.232) = 1.689 | ||
Constant | 3.785 | ||
Random component (SE) | 2.264 | ||
Coefficient of determination (R2) | 0.462 |
Type of Products | Model of Discriminant Analysis | Classification Functions | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wilks’ Lambda: 0.955 F (12.749) = 2.9140 p < 0.001 * | Gender | ||||
Wilks’ Lambda | F Value | p Level | Male p = 0.56 | Female p = 0.43 | |
Fresh vegetables, fruits and their products | 0.962 | 4.818 | 0.001 * | 1.249 | 1.270 |
Cereal products | 0.961 | 4.818 | 0.001 * | 0.792 | 0.846 |
Potatoes | 0.956 | 0.570 | 0.001 * | 0.243 | 0.238 |
Cow’s milk and its products | 0.958 | 2.919 | 0.001 * | 0.829 | 0.722 |
Goat’s milk and its products | 0.956 | 3.525 | 0.001 * | 0.113 | 0.233 |
Eggs | 0.957 | 2.146 | 0.011 * | 1.114 | 1.032 |
Honey | 0.958 | 2.184 | 0.002 * | 0.941 | 0.955 |
Beverages other than milk | 0.958 | 2.183 | 0.140 | 0.535 | 0.625 |
Pork meat and its products | 0.958 | 1.889 | 0.169 | 0.721 | 0.698 |
Constant | 13.613 | 12.971 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wojciechowska-Solis, J.; Barska, A. Exploring the Preferences of Consumers’ Organic Products in Aspects of Sustainable Consumption: The Case of the Polish Consumer. Agriculture 2021, 11, 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020138
Wojciechowska-Solis J, Barska A. Exploring the Preferences of Consumers’ Organic Products in Aspects of Sustainable Consumption: The Case of the Polish Consumer. Agriculture. 2021; 11(2):138. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020138
Chicago/Turabian StyleWojciechowska-Solis, Julia, and Anetta Barska. 2021. "Exploring the Preferences of Consumers’ Organic Products in Aspects of Sustainable Consumption: The Case of the Polish Consumer" Agriculture 11, no. 2: 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020138
APA StyleWojciechowska-Solis, J., & Barska, A. (2021). Exploring the Preferences of Consumers’ Organic Products in Aspects of Sustainable Consumption: The Case of the Polish Consumer. Agriculture, 11(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020138