Next Article in Journal
China’s Tea Industry: Net Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mitigation Potential
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Impacts of Smallholder Farmer’s Participation in Modern Agricultural Value Chain Tactics for Facilitating Poverty Alleviation—A Case Study of Kiwifruit Industry in Shaanxi, China
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Physical Characteristic Parameters of Banana Bunches for the Design and Development of Postharvesting Machinery and Equipment
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of the Start-Up Aid for Young Farmers in the Adoption of Innovative Agricultural Activities: The Case of Aloe Vera
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Marketing of Vegetable Seeds: Practice and Behavioral Inclinations of Vegetable Seed Sellers and Farmers in Selected Areas of Bangladesh

Agriculture 2021, 11(4), 364; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040364
by Shahriar Mustafiz, Akira Nakayasu and Mamoru Itabashi *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agriculture 2021, 11(4), 364; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11040364
Submission received: 25 March 2021 / Revised: 13 April 2021 / Accepted: 14 April 2021 / Published: 16 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Food Marketing, Economics and Policies)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The discussed topic is interesting and important from the point of view of efficient marketing system. However, the article requires corrections and additions.

The justification for the research problems undertaken in the introduction is rather poor. It would be necessary to define the "marketing system" and discuss its specificity and role in agriculture/ vegetable seed sector, or more broadly in agribusiness.

The methodology is insufficiently described. What was the selection method for the research? Was it deliberate or random selection?

The "discussion" section is rather a summary of the research results. There is a lack of reconciliation with the results of other authors.

The contribution of the presented research results was insufficiently justified. The value of the work would be enriched by the indication of further research directions.

Author Response

I have improved the followings-

  1. Introduction
  2. Materials and methods
  3. Tables and graphs
  4. Text of abstract, result, discussion and conclusion

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is documented and presented quite clearly. It looks more like a study of local interest.
In my opinion, the paper must be radically improved in the following aspects:
- the abstract is a synthesis of the general, introductory part, no clear aspects of methodology and results are presented.
- the documentation of the paper is very low, few and especially old reference are presented, the last paper as current is from 2017.
- the research methodology is poorly presented.
- the results are simply presented, the quality of the presented graphs being very low.

Author Response

I have improved the followings-

  1. Introduction
  2. Design
  3. Materials and methods
  4. Tables and graphs
  5. Text of abstract, result, discussion, and conclusion

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The author followed my recommendation, the paper is clearer, I recommend the publication of the article.

Back to TopTop