An Italian Explorative Study of Willingness to Pay for a New Functional Pasta Featuring Opuntia ficus indica
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Data Collection and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Çakiroǧlu, F.P.; Uçar, A. Consumer attitudes towards purchasing functional products. Prog. Nutr. 2018, 20, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
- Ross, S. Functional foods: The Food and Drug Administration perspective. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 71, 1735S–1738S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Troszyńska, A.; Estrella, I.; López-Amóres, M.L.; Hernández, T. Antioxidant activity of pea (Pisum sativum L.) seed coat acetone extract. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2002, 35, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yasuda, A.; Kuraya, E.; Touyama, A.; Higa, O.; Hokamoto, K.; Itoh, S. Underwater shockwave pretreatment process for improving carotenoid content and yield of extracted carrot (Daucus carota L.) juice. J. Food Eng. 2017, 211, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilić, J.D.; Nikolovski, B.G.; Petrović, L.B.; Kojić, P.S.; Lončarević, I.S.; Petrović, J.S. The garlic (A. sativum L.) extracts food grade W1/O/W2 emulsions prepared by homogenization and stirred cell membrane emulsification. J. Food Eng. 2017, 205, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laiño, J.E.; Juarez del Valle, M.; Savoy de Giori, G.; LeBlanc, J.G.J. Development of a high folate concentration yogurt naturally bio-enriched using selected lactic acid bacteria. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 54, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- La Scalia, G.; Micale, R.; Cannizzaro, L.; Marra, F.P. A sustainable phenolic compound extraction system from olive oil mill wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 3782–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bech-Larsen, T.; Grunert, K.G. The perceived healthiness of functional foods: A conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers’ perception of functional foods. Appetite 2003, 40, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frewer, L.; Scholderer, J.; Lambert, N. Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Issues for the future. Br. Food J. 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saher, M.; Arvola, A.; Lindeman, M.; Lähteenmäki, L. Impressions of functional food consumers. Appetite 2004, 42, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urala, N.; Lähteenmäki, L. Reasons behind consumers’ functional food choices. Nutr. Food Sci. 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micale, R.; Giallanza, A.; Enea, M.; La Scalia, G. Economic assessment based on scenario analysis for the production of a new functional pasta. J. Food Eng. 2018, 237, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasler, C.M.; Brown, A.C. Position of the American Dietetic Association: Functional foods. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 735–746. [Google Scholar]
- Bech-Larsen, T.; Scholderer, J. Functional foods in Europe: Consumer research, market experiences and regulatory aspects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahl, J.; Załęcka, A.; Ploeger, A.; Bügel, S.; Huber, M. Functional food and organic food are competing rather than supporting concepts in europe. Agriculture 2012, 2, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Menrad, K. Market and marketing of functional food in Europe. J. Food Eng. 2003, 56, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arias-Aranda, D.; Romerosa-Martínez, M.M. Innovation in the functional foods industry in a peripheral region of the European Union: Andalusia (Spain). Food Policy 2010, 35, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oniszczuk, A.; Wójtowicz, A.; Oniszczuk, T.; Matwijczuk, A.; Dib, A.; Markut-Miotła, E. Opuntia fruits as food enriching ingredient, the first step towards new functional food products. Molecules 2020, 25, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Décordé, K.; Teissèdre, P.; Auger, C.; Cristol, J.; Rouanet, J. Phenolics from purple grape, apple, purple grape juice and apple juice prevent early atherosclerosis induced by an atherogenic diet in hamsters. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2008, 52, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Galati, E.M.; Tripodo, M.M.; Trovato, A.; d’Aquino, A.; Monforte, M.T. Biological activity of Opuntia ficus indica cladodes II: Effect on experimental hypercholesterolemia in rats. Pharm. Biol. 2003, 41, 175–179. [Google Scholar]
- Andreu-Coll, L.; Cano-Lamadrid, M.; Noguera-Artiaga, L.; Lipan, L.; Carbonell-Barrachina, Á.A.; Rocamora-Montiel, B.; Legua, P.; Hernández, F.; López-Lluch, D. Economic estimation of cactus pear production and its feasibility in Spain. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 103, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reis, C.M.G.; Gazarini, L.C.; Ribeiro, M.M. Fruit production from Opuntia ficus-indica ecotypes in comparison to commercial Italian clones. Hortic. Sci. 2018, 45, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albano, C.; Negro, C.; Tommasi, N.; Gerardi, C.; Mita, G.; Miceli, A.; De Bellis, L.; Blando, F. Betalains, phenols and antioxidant capacity in cactus pear [Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Mill.] fruits from Apulia (South Italy) genotypes. Antioxidants 2015, 4, 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- López, R.; De Ita, A.; Vaca, M. Drying of prickly pear cactus cladodes (Opuntia ficus indica) in a forced convection tunnel. Energy Convers. Manag. 2009, 50, 2119–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouazizi, S.; Montevecchi, G.; Antonelli, A.; Hamdi, M. Effects of prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica L.) peel flour as an innovative ingredient in biscuits formulation. LWT 2020, 124, 109155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Micale, R.; Giallanza, A.; Russo, G.; La Scalia, G. Selection of a sustainable functional pasta enriched with Opuntia using ELECTRE III methodology. Sustainability 2017, 9, 885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aiello, A.; Di Bona, D.; Candore, G.; Carru, C.; Zinellu, A.; Di Miceli, G.; Nicosia, A.; Gambino, C.M.; Ruisi, P.; Caruso, C. Targeting aging with functional food: Pasta with Opuntia single-arm pilot study. Rejuvenation Res. 2018, 21, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altamore, L.; Bacarella, S.; Columba, P.; Chironi, S. The Italian Consumers’ Preferences for Pasta: Does Environment Matter? Chem. Eng. Trans. 2017, 58, 859–864. [Google Scholar]
- Defrancesco, E.; Perito, M.A.; Bozzolan, I.; Cei, L.; Stefani, G. Testing consumers’ preferences for environmental attributes of pasta. Insights from an ABR approach. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Altamore, L.; Ingrassia, M.; Columba, P.; Chironi, S.; Bacarella, S. Italian Consumers’ Preferences for Pasta and Consumption Trends: Tradition or Innovation? J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2019, 32, 337–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Suardi, A.; Stefanoni, W.; Pari, L. Opuntia ficus-indica as an Ingredient in New Functional Pasta: Consumer Preferences in Italy. Foods 2021, 10, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szakály, Z.; Kovács, S.; Pető, K.; Huszka, P.; Kiss, M. A modified model of the willingness to pay for functional foods. Appetite 2019, 138, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McCullough, D. Web-based market research: The dawning of a new age. DIRECT Mark. CITY 1998, 61, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
- Verbeke, W. Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 39, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Perito, M.A.; Lupi, C. Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: Some hints from Italy. Br. Food J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cameron, A.C.; Trivedi, P.K. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005; ISBN 1139444867. [Google Scholar]
- McFadden, D. Economic choices. Am. Econ. Rev. 2001, 91, 351–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CRAN Package ‘rms.’ 2021. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rms/rms.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Team, R.C. Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- La Barbera, F.; Amato, M.; Sannino, G. Understanding consumers’ intention and behaviour towards functionalised food. Br. Food J. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmieri, N.; Simeone, M.; Russo, C.; Angela, M. Profiling young consumers’ perceptions of GMO products: A case study on Italian undergraduate students. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2020, 21, 100224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollingsworth, P. Margarine: The over-the-top functional food. Food Technol. 2001, 55, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
- Sessa L Il Giornale del cibo. Conoscere, Scoprire, Gustare. Available online: https://www.ilgiornaledelcibo.it/fico-d-india-ricette-piatti/ (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Giraitalia Sagre in Italia. Available online: https://www.giraitalia.it/sagre/ (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Pappalardo, G.; Lusk, J.L. The role of beliefs in purchasing process of functional foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 53, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cox, D.N.; Bastiaans, K. Understanding Australian consumers’ perceptions of selenium and motivations to consume selenium enriched foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2007, 18, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urala, N.; Lähteenmäki, L. Attitudes behind consumers’ willingness to use functional foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2004, 15, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verbeke, W. Consumer acceptance of functional foods: Socio-demographic, cognitive and attitudinal determinants. Food Qual. Prefer. 2005, 16, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teratanavat, R.; Hooker, N.H. Consumer valuations and preference heterogeneity for a novel functional food. J. Food Sci. 2006, 71, S533–S541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Øvrum, A.; Alfnes, F.; Almli, V.L.; Rickertsen, K. Health information and diet choices: Results from a cheese experiment. Food Policy 2012, 37, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, T.; Ali, J. Factors affecting the consumers’ willingness to pay for health and wellness food products. J. Agric. Food Res. 2020, 2, 100076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Trijp, J.C.M.; Steenkamp, J. Consumer-oriented new product development: Principles and practice. Innov. Agri-Food Syst. 2005, 87–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Albuquerque, J.G.; de Souza Aquino, J.; de Albuquerque, J.G.; de Farias, T.G.S.; Escalona-Buendía, H.B.; Bosquez-Molina, E.; Azoubel, P.M. Consumer perception and use of nopal (Opuntia ficus-indica): A cross-cultural study between Mexico and Brazil. Food Res. Int. 2019, 124, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
WTP a Premium Price for Functional Pasta (%) Compared with the Price of Conventional Pasta | % |
---|---|
0 | 12.50 |
≤50% | 73.17 |
>50% | 14.33 |
Total | 100.00 |
Variable | Mean | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|
Willingness to pay for functional pasta (WTP) | 1.02 | 0.62 |
Aspects respondents pay attention to when they consume food | ||
Health effects | 7.25 | 2.00 |
Proteic_aspects | 5.91 | 2.79 |
Food neophobia | ||
Respondents do not trust new food (do_not_trust) | 3.96 | 2.44 |
If the respondents do not know what is in a food, they will not try it (do_not_try) | 5.75 | 2.99 |
Food technology neophobia | ||
New food technologies decrease the natural quality of food (low_quality) | 4.44 | 2.81 |
New food technologies are unnecessary (no_tecnology) | 3.78 | 2.72 |
Agreement or disagreement with some statements | ||
Italian pasta is produced only with Italian durum wheat (Italy) | 3.09 | 2.60 |
Respondents’ behavior towards functional pasta | ||
People’s willingness to consume functional pasta (willing) | 0.88 | 0.1 |
Functional pasta characteristics could affect respondents’ decision to eat it | ||
People’s curiosity towards functional food (curiosity) | 6.65 | 3.20 |
If functional pasta production is less environmentally impactful than conventional pasta, consumers would eat it (low_env_impact) | 6.24 | 3.14 |
If the respondents get more information about functional pasta comprising Opuntia, they would eat it (more_info) | 6.38 | 3.01 |
Respondents’ sociodemographic information | ||
Education (edu) | 0.77 | 0.20 |
Annual income (income) | 2.50 | 1.20 |
Variables | % |
---|---|
Gender | |
male | 39.00 |
female | 61.00 |
Total | 100.00 |
Education | |
low education (primary or secondary school) | 11.00 |
high education (degree, master and/or PhD) | 89.00 |
Total | 100.00 |
Annual Income | |
<10,000 | 4.39 |
10,001–20,000 | 13.60 |
20,001–30,000 | 35.08 |
30,001–40,000 | 28.07 |
40,001–50,000 | 11.84 |
>50,001 | 7.02 |
Total | 100.00 |
Coef. | Std.Err | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dept variable: Willingness to pay for functional pasta (WTP) | Number of observations = 342 | |||
LR chi2 = 96.55 | ||||
Prob > chi2 = 0.0001 | ||||
PseudoR2 = 0.41 | ||||
Wald z | P > |Z| | |||
health_effects | 0.2743 | 0.0790 | 3.47 | 0.0005 |
proteic_aspects | 0.3812 | 0.0773 | 4.93 | <0.0001 |
The respondent does not trust new food (do_not_trust) | −0.2083 | 0.0835 | −2.49 | 0.0126 |
If the respondent does not know what is in a food, they will not try the new food (do_not_try) | −0.1786 | 0.0673 | −2.65 | 0.8002 |
New food technologies decrease the natural quality of food (low_quality) | −0.1762 | 0.0680 | −2.59 | 0.0010 |
New food technologies are unnecessary (no_tecnology) | 0.0166 | 0.0703 | 0.24 | 0.8134 |
The respondent believes Italian pasta is produced only with Italian durum wheat (Italy) | −0.0968 | 0.0609 | −1.59 | 0.1117 |
The respondent’s willingness to consume functional pasta featuring Opuntia Ficus Indica (willing) | 1.5178 | 0.4614 | 3.29 | 0.0010 |
The respondent’s curiosity towards functional food (curiosity) | 0.1467 | 0.0701 | 2.09 | 0.0003 |
If functional pasta production is less environmentally impactful than conventional pasta one, the respondent would eat it (low_env_impact) | 0.0589 | 0.0779 | 0.76 | 0.4496 |
If the respondent gets more information about functional pasta comprising Opuntia, they would eat it (more_info) | 0.0767 | 0.0742 | 1.03 | 0.001 |
The respondent’s education (edu) | 0.1515 | 0.2491 | 0.61 | 0.001 |
The respondent’s annual income (income) | 0.1648 | 0.1255 | 1.31 | 0.001 |
Threshold 1 | 0.1248 | 0.6743 | ||
Threshold 2 | 4.2120 | 0.7570 |
Odds Ratio | Std. Err | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dept variable: Willingness to pay for functional pasta (WTP) | Number of observations = 342 | |||||
LR chi2 = 96.55 | ||||||
Prob > chi2= 0.0001 | ||||||
PseudoR2 = 0.41 | ||||||
Wald z | P > |Z| | 95% Conf | Interval | |||
health_effects | 1.097 | 0.31587 | 3.47 | 0.0005 | 0.478 | 1.716 |
proteic_aspects | 1.524 | 0.30930 | 4.93 | <0.0001 | 0.918 | 2.131 |
The respondent does not trust new food (do_not_trust) | −0.833 | 0.33395 | −2.49 | 0.0126 | −0.178 | 1.487 |
If the respondent does not know what is in a food, they will not try the new food (do_not_try) | −0.892 | 0.336 | −2.65 | 0.8002 | −1.552 | 0.233 |
New food technologies decrease the natural quality of food (low_quality) | −0.704 | 0.271 | −2.59 | 0.0010 | −1.237 | 0.171 |
New food technologies are unnecessary (no_tecnology) | 0.066 | 0.281 | 0.24 | 0.8134 | −0.484 | 0.617 |
The respondent believes Italian pasta is produced only with Italian durum wheat (Italy) | −0.387 | 0.243 | −1.59 | 0.1117 | −0.864 | 0.089 |
The respondent’s willingness to consume functional pasta featuring Opuntia Ficus Indica (willing) | 1.517 | 0.461 | 3.29 | 0.0010 | 0.613 | 2.422 |
The respondent’s curiosity towards functional food (curiosity) | 0.880 | 0.420 | 2.09 | 0.0003 | 0.056 | 1.704 |
If functional pasta production is less environmentally impactful than conventional pasta one, respondent would eat it (low_env_impact) | 0.353 | 0.467 | 0.76 | 0.4496 | −0.562 | 1.269 |
If the respondent gets more information about functional pasta comprising Opuntia, they would eat it (more_info) | 0.383 | 0.371 | 1.03 | 0.001 | −0.343 | 1.110 |
The respondent’s education (edu) | 0.302 | 0.498 | 0.61 | 0.001 | 0.006 | 1.279 |
The respondent’s annual income (income) | 0.164 | 0.125 | 1.31 | 0.001 | 0.081 | 0.410 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Palmieri, N.; Stefanoni, W.; Latterini, F.; Pari, L. An Italian Explorative Study of Willingness to Pay for a New Functional Pasta Featuring Opuntia ficus indica. Agriculture 2021, 11, 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080701
Palmieri N, Stefanoni W, Latterini F, Pari L. An Italian Explorative Study of Willingness to Pay for a New Functional Pasta Featuring Opuntia ficus indica. Agriculture. 2021; 11(8):701. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080701
Chicago/Turabian StylePalmieri, Nadia, Walter Stefanoni, Francesco Latterini, and Luigi Pari. 2021. "An Italian Explorative Study of Willingness to Pay for a New Functional Pasta Featuring Opuntia ficus indica" Agriculture 11, no. 8: 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080701
APA StylePalmieri, N., Stefanoni, W., Latterini, F., & Pari, L. (2021). An Italian Explorative Study of Willingness to Pay for a New Functional Pasta Featuring Opuntia ficus indica. Agriculture, 11(8), 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080701