3. Results and Discussion
Fatty oils and, less often, essential oils obtained from plants and algae, are used as raw materials for biofuel production. Used cooking oil, animal fats and fish oil are also used in production [
31,
32,
33,
34,
35]. Note that biofuel produced from specific oils has different properties [
36,
37,
38].
Table 1 shows the crops cultivated in the Samara region that can be used in biofuel production.
Rapeseed oil is oxidation-resistant and has an iodine number of less than 120; therefore, rapeseed oil is convenient to use in winter. Rapeseed produces high yields, hence why most areas are planted with this crop, which is later used for biofuel production.
Sunflower oil is also used for biofuel production. Currently, sunflower yields are lower than rapeseed yields, but it grows well in countries with a warm, dry climate. It has an iodine number of more than 120 (according to the European Standard EN 14,214, it should not exceed 120), which is why it needs to be blended with other oils that contain less iodine. Potential possibilities of using other oilseeds as raw materials for biofuel production have not been fully explored yet [
31].
For the production of biofuel with developed properties, the following crops can be used:
crops with minimum concentrations of polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic acid (18:3);
crops with maximum concentrations of monounsaturated fatty acids, such as oleic acid (18:1), to ensure stability in combination with convenience of use in winter;
crops with minimum concentrations of saturated fatty acids (16:0) and stearic acid (18:0) for convenient usage in winter [
39,
40,
41].
Several important properties of products of transesterification of the most common vegetable oils with methanol are presented in
Table 2.
Currently, the most common biofuel is rapeseed methyl ester (RME), which is extensively used in Sweden, Germany, France and other countries. Up to 30% of it can be added to diesel fuel without additional engine modification. Western European countries have decided on a mandatory addition of 5% of RME to diesel fuel, though in some countries (Sweden, for example), RME is used as a substitute for diesel. Thus, we propose that the production volume of methylated vegetable oils will increase and agri-technologies will improve, which will result in the reduction in their costs to an acceptable level [
42,
43,
44].
Many scientific research institutions and universities, including Samara State Agrarian University and the Povolzsky machinery testing station, have conducted research on the use of RME biofuel, and developed utility flow schemes as well as fuel supply systems for tractors, adapted for the use of biofuel.
It was established that the reduction in engine power output of biofuel is insignificant: fuel consumption increases by 5–8%, but engine life does not change. Biofuel also has promising lubricating properties. Soot emissions decrease by 50%, carbon dioxide by 10–12% and sulfur by 0.05%, as compared with 0.2–0.5% for diesel fuel.
Technology for the conversion of vegetable oils to biofuel has developed considerably over the past few years, especially in Tatarstan. The resulting products (diesel fuel, forage pulp and glycerin) are in demand, and their joint production makes the process cost-effective.
The simplicity of the technology and economic characteristics of the process makes biofuel more appealing to agricultural producers, considering that diesel fuel is the main fuel in agriculture.
The first organization to produce biofuel in the Samara region was “Biosam” in Krasnoyarsky district. On the basis of the laboratory of the Department of Tractors and Vehicles of Samara State Agrarian University, the Biosam company tested biofuel samples produced by MIXER. The samples demonstrated great antiwear and antiscuffing results.
The results of bench tests conducted on engines running on alternative fuel conducted by the Povolzsky machinery testing station show that:
engine power generated by blends of diesel and biofuel in different proportions is sufficiently close to the engine power generated by diesel fuel, is within tolerance limits, and differences are insignificant. A slight increase in engine power for 50% biofuel blend is due to high kinematic viscosity of blends, which reduces leakage in plunger pairs;
fuel consumption rate for engines running on diesel–biofuel blend is higher than for diesel fuel due to the lower calorific value of biofuel.
We also calculated the comparative effectiveness of biofuel production. In accordance with this calculation, the cost of 1 L of homemade biofuel is 30–50% lower than the wholesale price of diesel fuel.
To determine the minimum number of biofuel production units, we should determine the amount of fuel consumed in the Samara region, which depends on cultivated crops and production technology.
Table 3 shows the structure of crop acreage by agricultural zones in percentage.
Annual reports of organizations reflect crop acreage and material costs of petroleum products per crop. Thus, material costs of petroleum products per ha can be calculated by dividing the material costs of petroleum products by crop acreage.
Table 4 reports the results for agricultural zones of the region.
Considering that 15 organizations have not planted any cropland with potato and cucurbits, and that the share of this category in the structure of crop acreage does not exceed 0.5%, we decided to apply the average value for all categories to this category. To calculate material costs of petroleum products for every zone, we multiply the coefficients for crop categories by crop acreage.
Thus, EUR 28,460.73 thousand was spent for the cultivation of crops on the total area of 1,488,898.2 ha in the Samara region (
Table 5). We analyzed trends in diesel retail prices using the Yandex Quotation, and the results show that, in 2018, the retail value of diesel fuel varied from EUR 0.367 to 0.382 per liter. However, considering the fact that agricultural units purchase large consignments of diesel fuel before field works, we can assume that the cost of diesel fuel is EUR 0.37/L.
Therefore, we divide material costs by cost of fuel purchase. Note that material costs of petroleum products relate to costs of diesel fuel and gasoline. The structural analysis of petroleum products used over the past 3 years shows that diesel fuel accounts for 93%, and gasoline for 7%. Given the correction, we can determine the amount of petroleum products used to cultivate crops (
Table 6).
Biodiesel is a methyl ester. It is obtained from vegetable oils by a transesterification reaction: methanol is added to the vegetable oil in a ratio of approximately 9:1 and a small amount of catalyst. From one ton of vegetable oil and 111 kg of alcohol (in the presence of 12 kg of catalyst), approximately 970 kg (1100 L) of biodiesel and 153 kg of primary glycerol are obtained. It is recommended to use potassium or sodium methoxide (methylates) as catalysts, after which the mixture is processed in a cavitation reactor [
45,
46].
Biosam LLC (Samara) developed an automated system, MIXER, for the production of biodiesel with a capacity of 500 and 1000 L per hour. The power consumption of cavitation reactors is 7.5 and 15 kW, respectively. The operating mode is three-shift. The complexes are equipped with metering devices that allow feeding components into the reactor with high accuracy. The use of a hydrodynamic cavitation reactor allows one to reduce the reaction temperature to 30–35 °C, and to ensure that all components are fully involved in the transesterification reaction [
47,
48].
After processing in a cavitation reactor, the mixture is fed into special separator columns, where it is divided into fractions. The complexes can work on absolutely any kind of vegetable oil, and use methyl alcohol, potassium hydroxide, sodium hydroxide or acid as catalysts in the reaction.
A flexible dosing system allows one to configure the installation not only with existing technologies for mixing the starting components, but also to create new technology that will most accurately take into account the local characteristics of the raw material [
49].
The calculation was carried out for a semiautomatic device with a 6YL-80 press with a capacity of 600 kg/change of finished fuel. The biofuel thus obtained has passed the test in Samara State Agrarian University and the Povolzsky machinery testing station, which shows that its characteristics correspond to the fuel developed in the traditional way.
The cost of 1 kg of biodiesel from rapeseed oil will be EUR 0.308. (
Table 7) According to the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation, the average price in Russia for summer diesel fuel as of 1 August 2018 amounted to EUR 0.421/ton.
The next task was to determine the comparative effectiveness of the sale of sunflower oil and the production of biodiesel from rapeseed oil [
50,
51,
52,
53,
54,
55]. A comparative calculation is carried out on the basis of a conventional farm with an area of arable land of 1000 ha.
With an average diesel fuel demand of 60 kg/ha, arable land is necessary for the entire agricultural complex to carry out 60 tons of fuel per year.
Option is sunflower.
In accordance with agricultural requirements, sunflower can be sown on the same area every 8 years.
This means that the maximum possible sowing area is 125 ha.
Sunflower yield will be 1.0 t/ha.
In total, one can obtain 125.0 tons of sunflower.
The yield of oil from sunflower seeds is 45%.
In total, 56.25 tons of oil can be obtained.
The cost of transport services and processing is EUR 1.065 thousand.
At a selling price of EUR 0.642/kg (data from the Ministry of Agriculture of the Russian Federation as of 01/08/2018), oil revenue will be EUR 36.095 thousand.
With these funds, one can purchase 85.8 tons of diesel fuel of the L-0.2-62 brand (summer) produced by the Novokuybyshevsky Oil Refinery (specific gravity of 0.86 kg/L).
To acquire 60 tons of diesel fuel, 87.4 hectares of sunflower must be sown.
At a cost of EUR 153.298/ha, total cost will amount to EUR 13.398 thousand.
Option is rapeseed.
With a yield of 1.5 t/ha and an area of 125 ha, 187.5 t of rapeseed can be obtained.
The yield of oil is 42% or 78.75 tons.
From this amount of oil, 87.81 tons of biofuel can be prepared.
Based on the needs of the economy, 85.42 ha can be allocated for rapeseed.
The cost of 1 ha of rapeseed will amount to EUR 115.047.
The cost of components is EUR 1.551 thousand.
The cost of cultivation is EUR 10.102 thousand.
Total cost—EUR 11.653 thousand.
The direct economic effect of replacing sunflower with rapeseed will be EUR 1.745 thousand/1000 ha.
Moreover, there is an indirect effect, expressed as follows:
excess power churn can be used for squeezing oil for other purposes;
improvement of soil fertility and phytosanitary situation;
obtaining an additional amount (29.3 tons) of high-protein feed for dairy cattle (rapeseed cake). Rapeseed cake has a higher feed value (protein content up to 40% versus 32–34% in sunflower). Currently, the sale price of oilcake is EUR 125–150, i.e., the farm may receive additional income in the amount of EUR 3.66 thousand.
In conclusion, the comparative efficiency of biodiesel and diesel fuel for a particular economy was calculated.
State policy aimed at supporting the interests of the fuel and energy complex forces farmers to seek new approaches to agricultural production. Among those tested with identified locations, we can name the use of minimal and zero tillage, the use of energy-saving machines, etc. Currently, we are talking about finding a replacement for traditional fuel, i.e., the use of renewable energy sources, including vegetable oil based biodiesel. To determine the efficiency of using biodiesel, using the program for calculating technological maps in crop production, the need for diesel fuel was determined by month of the year.
The greatest demand falls on the month of October, when plowing is carried out, which is the most energy-intensive operation in traditional crop cultivation technology. To determine comparative efficiency, it is proposed that one uses the sowing structure of 2018, since, at present, it is this structure that most accurately reflects the financial and organizational capabilities of the enterprise in the field work [
56,
57,
58,
59,
60]. It is proposed that one should add to this structure the necessary area for the cultivation of rapeseed (400 ha), which is sufficient to provide biodiesel for the economy. As a result, the sown area will be 3952 ha. Based on the per hectare demand for diesel fuel for the cultivation of these crops, as well as the size of the sown area, we determine the cost of diesel fuel in the current year. The total demand for diesel fuel will be 238.8 tons. To determine the cost of diesel fuel, the amount found must be multiplied by the purchase price of fuel and lubricants (EUR 0.421/kg).
For field work, it is necessary to purchase diesel fuel for EUR 100.44 thousand. The cost of 1 kg of rapeseed-oil-based biodiesel is EUR 0.308. The costs of producing the required amount of biodiesel are presented in
Table 8. The amount of expenses, taking into account the annual production program, amounted to EUR 77.727 thousand. The economic effect will be EUR 26.803 thousand. The payback of this event is 1.36 year.
Table 9 shows a list of technological operations for each of the studied technologies for the cultivation of spring rapeseed. Cultivation technologies differed, first of all, by different intensity of soil cultivation: plowing by 25–27 cm, loosening by 10–12 cm, without mechanical tillage (direct sowing). Each variant of soil cultivation was studied at two levels of fertilization: without the use of fertilizers and against the background of the application of fertilizers at a dose of N
81P
38K
38, based on the calculation of the planned yield level of 15 cwt/ha.
Thus, six variants of technologies for cultivation of spring rapeseed, differing in the levels of costs for their implementation, have been put forward for study (
Table 10). The use of technologies based on minimum tillage and direct sowing can reduce the cost of fuels and lubricants, on average, more than twofold, from 50% to 26% in the share of total cost. However, with direct sowing, the need for a double increase in the use of crop protection products increases: from 5.7% with traditional technology to 18.5% of the total cost with direct sowing.
Increasing the yield of rapeseed is a fundamental factor in obtaining gross harvest and sales proceeds. The high cost of fertilizers and, as a result, a large share of investments in the sector of variable costs, is reflected in the profitability of the production of spring rapeseed with various cultivation technologies [
60,
61,
62,
63].
In the developed technology of direct sowing with the use of a full range of fertilizers, despite the high level of operating costs, the highest profitability is achieved—42.34%. This is primarily due to an increase in the yield of oilseeds of rape: from 16.4 cwt/ha for plowing to 17.0 cwt/ha for “zero” tillage and direct sowing due to the moisture retained by surface plant residues in the soil and full provision of plant nutrition due to the applied mineral fertilizers. The use of direct sowing technology can reduce production costs by more than EUR 0.032 thousand/ha. This is due to a decrease in the cost of performing energy-intensive tillage operations—deep plowing and subsequent presowing tillage [
64,
65,
66]. Direct sowing technology allows one to reduce fuel consumption per hectare by half compared to the technology taken for control (using plowing) from 55 to 23.6 kg/ha and reduce labor costs per unit of production to 0.87 man-h/t produced oilseeds.
Thus, on the basis of the performed calculations of economic efficiency in the production of spring rape oilseeds, along with the traditional technology in the Samara region, it is advisable to use the technology of direct sowing with the introduction of a full range of fertilizers. This technology under the conditions of the growing season, i.e., insufficient moisture supply, allows one to obtain a higher yield and reduces production costs per unit of manufactured product—rapeseed oil. The use of direct sowing technology can reduce the cost of fuels and lubricants, on average, more than twofold, compared to conventional technology with plowing, and reduce the per hectare consumption of motor fuel and labor costs by reducing energy-intensive operations [
67,
68,
69,
70].
We identified agricultural crops cultivated in the Samara region and suitable for the manufacture of oil (
Table 11). In this regard, the interest in considering the economics of the cultivation of these oilseeds is growing, including studying the features of their place in crop rotation and technology, and the influence of these factors on the cost. The final value of the cost of each oilseed crop will be the minimum value among the considered cultivation technologies.
An example of revealing the dependence of the cost of cultivating oilseeds on the technology of their cultivation is provided for spring rape. Spring rapeseed was selected as a sample crop taking into account the highest oil yield (1000 kg of oil per hectare). Further crops are presented in descending order of the value of this indicator.
In the Samara region, a certain technology for growing sunflower has developed, which allows one to obtain high yields at an earlier date while reducing financial and labor costs. Taking into account the use of new hybrids and varieties with improved characteristics, farmers are able to achieve excellent results in this important branch of agriculture.
Growing sunflower in accordance with the most promising technology allows one to receive a good income from this industry, since sowing requires about 10 kg of seeds per ha, and the yield per hectare can reach 25 cwt. Moreover, not only vegetable oil is obtained from the collected seeds, but also meal, husk and cake, which can become a tangible additional source of income.
Compliance with crop rotation when growing sunflower with the correct alternation of crops in the field is the key to a successful harvest. Sunflower seeds can be sown in the same area no earlier than 6 years after the last sunflower crop, otherwise the seeds of broomrape and pathogens will accumulate in the ground, which can have an extremely negative effect on the crop.
Mineral and organic fertilizers applied in sufficient quantities contribute to the increase in yield and acceleration of the development of the sunflower crop. Throughout the growing season, the sunflower crop needs phosphorus, nitrogen, potassium fertilizers, as well as trace elements such as boron, zinc and manganese.
False flax is a small-seeded oilseed crop of the cruciferous family. It is an annual plant with an erect, branched stem up to 100 cm tall. Agricultural enterprises are interested in obtaining oil on unproductive lands, which will strengthen the economy of the economy (average yield of 10–13 cwt/ha). Its seeds contain over 40% oil and 30% crude protein.
The most promising technology is the cultivation of spring camelina using herbicidal fallow, the preparation of which is carried out using soil-protective moisture-saving technology [
71].
Mustard is a triple-industry crop due to its widespread use. It is grown for high quality edible oil, mustard powder and green animal feed. In addition, mustard is widely used as green manure crops, since it has the unique property of absorbing difficult-to-reach forms of nutrients from the soil and transforming them into easily digestible forms.
The average pumpkin yield is relatively low—13.7 cwt/ha. On average, the mass of 1000 seeds in pumpkins does not exceed 420 g. The seeds remain viable for up to 6–8 years. Pumpkin seeds are most responsive to the application of manure or other organic fertilizers in doses of 20–40 t/ha. This procedure is performed after the main plowing, presowing cultivation or cutting of irrigation furrows. With intensive technology, mineral fertilizers are applied simultaneously with sowing. The oil content in oil flax seeds reaches 32–48%. In seven-to-eight-field crop rotations, flax should occupy no more than one field, and return it to its original place no earlier than 6–7 years later. In crop rotations, flax is placed after the best predecessors: perennial grasses, according to the seam turnover, cereals, legumes, winter crops, sown in pairs or after grasses, as well as after row crops. Soybeans are the most widespread pulses of the world. Its seeds contain on average 36–42% of complete protein, consisting of globulins and a small amount of albumin, 19–22% of semi-drying oil and up to 30% of carbohydrates. The best predecessors of soybeans in many areas of its cultivation include green manure fallows, the layer and turnover of the layer of perennial grasses, cereals and spike crops that grow in clean and busy pairs, as well as row crops (corn, potatoes, sugar beets, sweet potatoes, etc.) Soybeans are not grown after Sudanese grass and sunflower; it is also not recommended to sow it after corn, to which the herbicides simazine and atrazine were applied. The optimal saturation of crop rotations with soy is from 22 to 40%. To avoid the negative impact of repeated crops on the yield of soybeans, it is recommended to return it to the field no earlier than after 4 years. In the calculation, we neglect such crops as corn, oats and lupine due to the low content of seed oil (less than 200 kg of oil per hectare). This indicator is twofold lower in comparison with the oilseeds described above. Thus, we assume a decrease in the oil yield in these crops.
The results of the financial analysis of crop producers of the region show that no more than 15% of financially stable agricultural organizations producing oil crop receive government support for fuel and lubricant materials. The analysis of crop producers of the region and social survey of managers and experts reveals that their situation is compounded by price disparities, lack of technical equipment, high costs of fuel, and lack of outlets for crop products. This has identified the need for the development of an economic mathematical model that allows one to calculate the optimal level of government support for every type of biofuel considering forms of government support [
72,
73,
74,
75,
76,
77].
The developed methodology allows for fast calculation of the optimal level of government support for biofuel production based on three scenarios (for all forms of business organization) using the Microsoft Excel tool [
78,
79,
80]. We developed a model for the optimization of government support for the production of biofuel by agricultural enterprises growing oil crops, considering the directions of financing [
81].
X1–8—types of oil crops;
X9–14—main directions of government support;
X15–17—forms of business organization
The model uses the following notations:
Z—the level of state support for the cultivation of the i-th crop for biofuel production;
Ci—costs of the unit for the i-th production technology;
Xi—lookup value of the i-th variable denoting the production technology and the level of support;
Ai—market output per unit for the i-th production technology;
aij—availability of the j-th resource per i-th unit;
bij—the amount of cash per year;
Ni—minimum area under the i-th oil crop used for the production of biofuel, cultivation of which must be guaranteed;
Ki—limited i-th production;
Q—limitations of economic resources
Objective functions:
optimization of the level of government support considering the main types of oil crops used for biofuel production to provide the region with biofuel:
maximization of the area under oil crops used for the production of biofuel to increase the profit:
minimization of costs while achieving the production volume that provides the households with enough biofuel:
The model allows us to obtain an optimal structure of production volume, operating costs, gross fuel price and fuel commodity price, as well as the expected profit in the context of a form of business organization [
82,
83]. Note that this model considers the optimal distribution of government support for all forms of business organizations (costs).
The main objective of the developed methodology is to achieve the optimal production volume at minimal cost, which would allow for the determination of the optimal level of government support for biofuel production to provide per household. A solution to this problem would allow the development of an optimal and effective system for the government regulation of biofuel production.
In accordance with the objective functions, we consider three scenarios of optimal government support:
the first scenario allows for optimization of the level of government support considering the levels of agricultural production for the i-th crop to provide farms of the region;
the second scenario allows for the determination of the maximum profit from the biofuel production through increased agriculturally used areas;
the third scenario allows for the calculation of the minimum expenses of achieving the volume of production that provides the farm with raw materials.
According to our calculations based on the first scenario, the optimum level of government support for the field should be EUR 13.223 million. In this case, financial resources should be distributed to the following targets:
preferential tax, loan and financing systems for producers accumulate funds of EUR 5.29 million;
development of biofuel production—EUR 4.63 million;
crop insurance—EUR 1.98 million;
development of information consulting service and technical equipment—EUR 1.044 million;
other targets—EUR 0.28 million.
In the implementation of the second scenario in the Samara region, the agriculturally used area planted with oil crops should be increased by 47.1 thousand ha. This would solve the problem of providing farms producing biofuel with raw materials, and improve the difficult financial situation of some producers.
In accordance with the third scenario, budgetary expenditures for the achievement of planned standards of production will equal EUR 370.08 thousand. The difference between the gross cost and diesel fuel per farm is EUR 0.98 thousand.
The most beneficial for agricultural organizations would be the reduction in tax payments to the federal and regional budgets.