Next Article in Journal
Study on the Technologies of Loss Reduction in Wheat Mechanization Harvesting: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Entomopathogenic Nematode Steinernema feltiae as an Indicator of Soil Pollution with Oil Derivatives in Bioremediation Process
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Mycorrhiza Fungi, Preceding Crops, Mineral and Bio Fertilizers on Maize Intercropping with Cowpea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biochar a Promising Strategy for Pesticide-Contaminated Soils
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Spatial Distribution of Salmonella in Soil near Municipal Waste Landfill Site

Agriculture 2022, 12(11), 1933; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111933
by Krzysztof Frączek, Dariusz Roman Ropek * and Jacek Kozdrój †
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Agriculture 2022, 12(11), 1933; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12111933
Submission received: 15 October 2022 / Revised: 12 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 17 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Contamination and Bioremediation of Agricultural Soils)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 

This manuscript deals with the assessment of the spatial distribution of Salmonella sp. in the soil near a municipal waste landfill site. Monitoring potential hazardous bacteria in the environment is quite important from biosafety and public health perspectives. This manuscript is well-written, and the experiment is well-designed. The provided GIS data would also be useful for research related to this field. Therefore, I think this manuscript can be accepted in the journal Agriculture after the authors correct several points described below.

 

Major point;

In the result and discussion section and Table 1, detection of Salmonella in winter was represented as “0%”, which is scientifically incorrect. It is needed to be presented as “undetectable” or “below detection limit” and show the detection limit of the assay used in the study. In addition, the persistency of the Salmonella in the environment is not discussed enough in the discussion. Please add this point.

 

Minor points;

1.     There are numerous typing errors. Please check thoroughly of this manuscript. (i.e. capitalization, superscript letter, italic etc…)

2.     Figure 2 and 3: Please wright in English in the annotation of the figures.

3.     Figure 1 and 4: What is the y-axis mean? In addition to this, it looks not linear.

 

Author Response

Responses to reviewers’ comments

Reviewer 1

Authors’ comments

In the result and discussion section and Table 1, detection of Salmonella in winter was represented as “0%”, which is scientifically incorrect. It is needed to be presented as “undetectable” or “below detection limit” and show the detection limit of the assay used in the study.

Was corrected

In addition, the persistency of the Salmonella in the environment is not discussed enough in the discussion. Please add this point.

It was added

“Jechalke et al. [16] concluded that one of the major factors affecting the persistence of Salmonella spp. in the soil might be the availability and composition of nutrients. In turn, some authors have indicated that the survival of these bacteria in different soils is correlated with differences in microbial communities [33,34].”

There are numerous typing errors. Please check thoroughly of this manuscript. (i.e. capitalization, superscript letter, italic etc…)

It was checked and corrected

Figure 2 and 3: Please wright in English in the annotation of the figures.

Was corrected

Figure 1 and 4: What is the y-axis mean? In addition to this, it looks not linear.

Unit of the y-axis was corrected. The scale of y-axis is logarithmic, to better show low and high values graphically. 

 

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors reported “Spatial distribution of Salmonella in soil near municipal waste landfill site”. This work may be acceptable for publication after addressing the comments below and revising the manuscript.

 

1. The authors need to improve a few errors. (m2, italic, g-1, etc.)

2. Introduction should be improved.

3. Please explain the positive and negative effects of Salmonella.

4. The authors add the characterization of soil.

5. The authors should explain the influence between salmonella and soil.

6. The authors should discuss the influence between salmonella and season.

7. The authors should revise all figure legends.

8. Overall, there were the lack of explanation.

Author Response

Responses to reviewers’ comments

Reviewer 2

Authors’ comments

1. The authors need to improve a few errors. (m2, italic, g-1, etc.)

Was corrected

2. Introduction should be improved.

Was corrected – new information was added.

“These bacteria can be found in human and animal manures being responsible for dangerous enteric diseases. When introduced into the soil as a waste or fertilizer component they pose a significant source of soil-origin infections both direct or indirect by feeding contaminated plants [12,15]. As enteric bacteria, Salmonella is an allochthonous genus to the soil environment, being a good indicator of fresh pollution by manures.”

“In turn, the treatment of soil with sewage sludge distinctly decreased the numbers of cultivable Salmonella Typhimurium LT2 that presumably entered into the viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state [17].”

3. Please explain the positive and negative effects of Salmonella.

Such information’s were added

“These bacteria can be found in human and animal manures being responsible for dangerous enteric diseases. When introduced into the soil as a waste or fertilizer component they pose a significant source of soil-origin infections both direct or indirect by feeding contaminated plants [12,15]. As enteric bacteria, Salmonella is an allochthonous genus to the soil environment, being a good indicator of fresh pollution by manures.”

4. The authors add the characterization of soil.

Information about soils type was added. 

“Soils that predominate in the study area are Epidistric Cambisols and Disric Cambisols. In terms of type, they are light and medium loess, and in the minority area heavy loess.”

5. The authors should explain the influence between salmonella and soil.

Such information’s were added

“These findings suggest that agricultural soils can be regarded as a long-term reservoir of Salmonella spp.”

6. The authors should discuss the influence between salmonella and season.

Such information’s were added

“(i.e. weather and atmospheric conditions) [16,30-32]. Jechalke et al. [16] concluded that one of the major factors affecting the persistence of Salmonella spp. in the soil might be the availability and composition of nutrients. In turn, some authors have indicated that the survival of these bacteria in different soils is correlated with differences in microbial communities [33,34].”

7. The authors should revise all figure legends.

Was corrected

8. Overall, there were the lack of explanation.

The section “Results and discussion” was improved

 

Reviewer 3 Report

The reviewed manuscript is dealing with the spatial distribution of salmonella in soil near a municipal waste landfill site (Barycz, Poland). Spatial and seasonal variations were investigated using statistical and GIS techniques. It contains scientific information that will be of interest to readers. I expressed a few remarks below, believing that they can help authors to improve the final version.

1. Lines 33:36; Please support this sentence with literature.

2. Line 65; change “geostatistical” to geographical.

3. Lines 71:81; It will be better if the authors increase the usage of GIS by providing a location map showing the sampling sites. Consider adding a base map indicating the exact location of the investigated landfill in Poland.

4. Line 102; [33]???

5. Lines 134:146; It will be better to move this information to the introduction section and merge it with Lines 41:54.

 

6. Figures 1, 2, and 3; Please improve these figures' quality. Consider defining the used symbols for the X and Y axes using the English language.

Author Response

Responses to reviewers’ comments

Reviewer 3

Authors’ comments

1. Lines 33:36; Please support this sentence with literature.

Was corrected – appropriate literature was added

2. Line 65; change “geostatistical” to geographical.

Was changed

3. Lines 71:81; It will be better if the authors increase the usage of GIS by providing a location map showing the sampling sites. Consider adding a base map indicating the exact location of the investigated landfill in Poland.

Sampling sites are shown on each graphics in figure 4. In authors opinion it is correct.

4. Line 102; [33]???

Cited publication was corrected. In this publications more information about stands are provided.

5. Lines 134:146; It will be better to move this information to the introduction section and merge it with Lines 41:54.

We have decided to improve this part without moving it.

6. Figures 1, 2, and 3; Please improve these figures' quality. Consider defining the used symbols for the X and Y axes using the English language

Was corrected

 

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript was improved.

Back to TopTop