Next Article in Journal
Effect of a Ridge-Furrow Mulching System and Limited Supplementary Irrigation on N2O Emission Characteristics and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Fields under Dryland Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Conservation Agriculture in Semi-Arid Zimbabwe: A Promising Practice to Improve Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.) Productivity and Soil Water Availability in the Short Term
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/agriculture12050624
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Seed Quality Assurance Regulations and Certification System in Soybean Production—A Chinese and International Perspective

by
Shwu-Pyng Joanna Chen
1,2,
Man-Wah Li
1,2,3,
Ho-Yan Wong
1,2,
Fuk-Ling Wong
1,2,
Tingting Wu
4,
Junyi Gai
5,6,
Tianfu Han
4,* and
Hon-Ming Lam
1,2,3,*
1
School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
2
Centre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
3
Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518000, China
4
MARA Key Laboratory of Soybean Biology (Beijing), Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
5
National Center for Soybean Improvement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
6
State Key Laboratory for Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2022, 12(5), 624; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050624
Submission received: 9 March 2022 / Revised: 25 April 2022 / Accepted: 26 April 2022 / Published: 27 April 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Soybean is an important and valuable crop for global food and feed supply, providing high-quality nutrition. Globally, five countries—namely Brazil, the USA, Argentina, China and India—have dominated soybean production for many years. The intention of this paper is to review the reasons for their dominance, starting with seeds. High-quality seeds enable stress-free, high-density and even planting of soybean in the field. Seed quality assurance is essential for the successful expansion of soybean cultivation. The aim of this review is to compare and contrast the factors impacting soybean seed production in these top five soybean-producing countries, including the situations at different stages of the supply chain; research and development on new soybean varieties; and regulations, rules and quality assurance systems (seed testing, certification and labeling). Since the soybean supply chain involves many different operating parties, principles and practices, efforts on different fronts need to be well coordinated by a central authority to ensure successful production. Recently, China has implemented a revised national “Seed Law”. The possible impacts of this new legal framework on soybean seed development and trading in China are also discussed. The strengthened China Seed law to protect resources and encourage variety innovation, as well as the clearer China GM soybean commercial release policy, implies future soybean cultivation expansion with elite varieties. A continuous global production increase will require every party’s compliance to the sustainability principles.

1. Introduction

Soybean is one of the most important cash crops in the world. It is among the few plant-based foods that provide high-quality proteins, with nine essential amino acids [1]. This unique quality makes it an ideal candidate as both a direct and indirect protein source for humans and farm animals. Today, more than 85% of soybean harvest is extracted for oil and crushed into meal to make animal feed, oil and biodiesel; the rest is used for human consumption and industrial ingredients [2,3,4]. The production and movement of this crop is closely associated with a country’s economy, food security and social equality development [5,6,7]. Apart from the traditional soybean-producing countries/regions in America and Asia, Africa is also predicted to be next major soybean-producing continent [8]. Furthermore, soybean is also gaining importance in sustainable agriculture due to its nitrogen fixation ability. Soybean has been demonstrated to be an effective nitrogen supplier in cropping systems that can significantly reduce demand on synthetic fertilizers, nitrogen leaching and air pollution [9,10]. Shifting to a soybean-oriented plant-based diet could also significantly reduce PM2.5 and consequential premature death [11].
Soybean is grown in many different parts of the world. Its production has expanded fast, with the USA leading the growth trend since the 1950s (Figure 1). Brazil first surpassed the USA in 2019, and grew steadily higher in the following two years. Global production quantity was estimated to be over 380 million metric tons in 2021/22 [3]. The top five producing countries (Brazil, the USA, Argentina, China and India) have accounted for over 80% of global production since 2012/13 and reached nearly 90% of the total output in 2020/21 (Figure 2) [12].
Out of the 366 million metric tons of soybean produced in 2020/2021, 165 million metric tons (45%) was exported. The major exporting countries are Brazil, the USA and Argentina. China was, by far, the leading importer of soybean (estimated to import 60% of the world’s total export), followed by the E.U. (12%) and Mexico (3.6%) [13].
Soybean production originated in China in ancient times [14,15]. China used to top the world in soybean production and export before World War II. During and after World War II, soybean production and export in China were interrupted for various reasons [16]. The status of China as the world’s top producer has never resumed since, with only one exception in 1957. In recent years, due to economic improvements, lifestyle changes (an increase in meat consumption) and population growth, the demand for soybean in China has been steadily increasing. Insufficient domestic supply has resulted in large import quantities every year [17,18,19].
In this review, the factors impacting soybean production and the quality assurance legislations in these top producing countries will be reviewed. Soybean can be traded as seeds for sowing (planting), as food for direct human consumption, or as raw material for industrial processes (oil and meal). The testing criteria and standards are different based on final applications. For sowing, the seed variety, purity and germination quality are important. For food and industrial processing, bean grading and fat/protein content analyses are pertinent. This review will focus mainly on seeds for sowing (planting).

2. Factors Impacting Soybean Production and Supply Chain

Country-specific agriculture policies dictate crop production output [20]. The size of the arable land and freshwater resources allocated, the farming system, the choice of crop, and the decision of whether to plant genetically modified (GM) soybean are the important factors directly influencing crop yield, aside from the political and financial considerations and impacts of climate disasters. China hosts ~20% of the world’s population but only possesses 9% and 6% of the world’s arable land and freshwater resources, respectively [21]. In view of these limitations and the large population in China, staple cereal crops have a higher priority than soybeans. Moreover, the prospect and regulation of the application of GM technology to soybeans has been unclear until the implementation of the revised national “Seed Law” very recently in 2022 (see later sections).
The areas in the USA and in Latin American countries under soybean cultivation are 2–3 times larger than those in India and China [12]. Larger farm sizes, along with investment, facilitate farm mechanization, allowing farmers to grow more at lower costs. The economics of competing crops among rice, corn, wheat and soybean vary by country and year, causing soybean production to fluctuate annually [22,23].
The USA was first to adopt the cultivation of genetically modified (GM) soybeans. Growing GM soybeans can help generate higher yields and reduce herbicide and pesticide usage [24,25]. Easier cultivation with a lower cost attracts more producers. USA commercialized Roundup Ready® soybean in 1996. Brazil and Argentina have adopted a similar GM soybean growing model/system with further innovations over the years. More than 90% of the total output from these top three producing countries are GM soybeans. Innovations in genetic modification have driven the rapid growth of soybean production [4]. The large-scale production of GM soybeans over the years has also generated concerns about long-term environmental pollution and adverse biodiversity impacts, particularly in the South American Amazon region [26,27]. Until now, China and India have only grown non-GM soybeans for local food consumption (China), oil crushing (India) and minor exports at premium prices (both China and India). Soybean yield in the top three countries is consistently higher than in China. India trails far behind China in total soybean production and yield per unit area despite having a larger area for soybean cultivation [28,29,30]. Although both China and India import GM soybeans for oil crushing and feed meals, local acceptance of GM soybeans as food is still low [31,32,33]. Debate over GM soybean cultivation also continues in other areas, particularly in the EU [34].
Good-quality seeds are the basis for successful agricultural production. Assurance of the seed quality using trusted and certified testing methods is critical for planting success. Well-organized production management by providing a proper seed supply to farmers and to markets is even more crucial to realize a significant output. The soybean production supply chain can be divided into three stages: seed breeding, farming, and harvesting and distribution (Figure 3) [3,29,35].
At the breeding stage, factors impacting production include basic research and cultivar development by private and public sectors (an elite cultivar will give a good yield if planted properly), cultivar registration, testing and trials, cultivar approval and listing, intellectual property (IP) protection, and cultivar commercialization. Since many new varieties are developed each year, it is essential to have an up-to-date, easily accessible database to provide farmers/buyers with the requisite educational and training information associated with the new varieties.
At the farming stage, farmers need to select the right cultivar for maximum yield; optimal adaptation to local geography, climate and soil conditions; and cost considerations. Preparation for sowing needs to include acreage/location planning and cropping considerations (crop rotation or intercropping). Electronic systems/tools for monitoring/recording climate (temperature, rainfall, day length, etc.) and soil (pH and mineral nutrient contents) conditions need to be made available for farmers’ use. Other aspects of management, including the applications of fertilizers, inoculants, herbicides, insecticides and other disease-control measures, also require thorough planning, review and execution to ensure efficiency and maximize economic benefits.
At the harvesting and distribution stage, harvesting and processing by mechanical means to minimize loss and reduce cost is critical [36,37]. Harvested seeds are authenticated by various accredited technicians and labs, and they need to be certified/labeled based on their destination for the domestic/international markets. It is critical to ensure that farmers comprehend all the necessary processes and adhere to the established standards and systems. Providing support to farmers to connect them to reliable financial transaction networks will contribute to their success [25].

3. Rules and Regulations for Seed Quality Assurance

As shown in Figure 3, many parties, influencing factors, standard compliance and delivery steps are involved in the soybean supply chain. The whole supply chain can be complex and confusing. To strengthen the seed sector, it is crucial that seed producers and companies adhere to regulations, rules, policies and standards that have been consequentially established to guarantee quality. Subsequent management and enforcement of the rules and regulations by a centrally coordinated body is paramount for success.
An overview of the seed laws, rules, regulations and systems in the top five soybean-producing countries (the USA, China, Argentina, Brazil and India) is displayed in Table 1.
Internationally, several organizations, conventions and treaties exist to deal with the regulation of seed trade. Together, they provide an international regulatory framework to oversee the interests of breeders, producers and buyers. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, http://www.oecd.org, Seed Schemes, accessed on 14 October 2021) defines Seed Schemes that are globally recognized for the varietal identity and purity of agricultural seeds moving in international trade [38]. Soybean is under the varietal certification of the Grass and Legume Seed Scheme, Glycine max (L.), Fabaceae family. This scheme lays out the minimum requirements for the soybean seed production procedures, methods and standards, including field inspections and post-control tests [39]. Currently, over 62,000 varieties from 204 species are under the OECD seed schemes. Sixty countries participate in various schemes, with 54 (including the USA, Argentina, Brazil and India, but not China) in the soybean scheme. OECD appoints a National Designated Authority (NDA) from each participating country to collaborate with other member countries. The International Seed Testing Association (ISTA, http://www.seedtest.org, accessed on 13 October 2021) develops globally recognized standard procedures for seed sampling and testing. The International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV, http://www.upov.int, accessed on 1 November 2021) provides the breeders of new plant varieties with intellectual property protection. The International Seed Federation (ISF, http://www.worldseed.org, accessed on 1 November 2021) sets the trade and arbitration rules. The food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO, http://www.fao.org, accessed on 14 October 2021) provides the international regulatory framework for related aspects of the seed trade, including plant health and phytosanitary measures, access, and benefit-sharing for plant germplasm and pesticide uses [38,39].
Nationally, each country promulgates its own national seed laws that govern domestic and international seed trades (Table 1). Domestically, each state/province/zone complies with the national principles and implements them with variations to suit local needs. The purpose of the seed laws, rules and regulations is to prevent misrepresentation of the seeds, to ensure good seed quality with agreed-upon testing standards and to check and prevent the spread of weeds/diseases/pests. Ultimately, it is to protect the right of the sellers (breeders, innovators and companies) and buyers (farmers and commercial entities). Hence, the laws include clauses for punishing false representation with penalties and seizure. The national rules and regulations align with international standards and requirements. Additional agreements can also be drawn up separately between individual exporting and importing countries to align with the specific requirements defined by the importing country.
USA, as the longest-leading producer of soybean in the past 70 years, instituted a complete set of rules, regulations and systems before 1940. The national seed law is publicized in the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 7, Part 201: Federal Seed Act Requirements [45] with periodic updates. It defines the roles and responsibilities of the regulatory and governing bodies and sets the regulatory framework for seed-production recording, testing, certifying and labeling. Soybean-producing states within the USA comply with the federal laws and could also develop their own detailed practices and standards. The seed laws and regulations in Brazil, Argentina and India follow a similar road map. The regulations in these four countries emphasize seed certification and label information accuracy (USA mandates label accuracy but leaves certification voluntary). China is the only major soybean-producing country that uses an administrative approval/confirmation/permit system with quality data on the label. Verification is performed by spot-check sampling. However, a seed certification system has recently been designed following the OECD seed scheme. Ten selected Chinese provinces tested the draft system with a good outcome. The system is anticipated to be formally implemented in the near future [46,47,48]. Some new developments in seed regulations in China will be discussed below.

4. Research and Development on New Seed Varieties

Research and development are critical for generating new varieties to improve growth and production results in specific areas/environments. The variety research and development in a country typically start in the public sector and then move into the private sector, due to the capacity and resources available there (Table 1). Private companies, in general, possess advanced technologies and hold IP patents that can assist farmers, particularly of small-to-medium-sized farms, at different stages of production. India implemented a project in Maharashtra (one of the key soybean-producing states) under the Public–Private Partnership Program for Integrated Agriculture Development (PPPIAD) Scheme and had good outcome [49]. Soybean breeding in China is still largely dependent on the public sector because of insufficient capacity in the local private sectors [50]. The USA is a good example of success in the private sectors in developing new varieties using biotechnology, resulting in major global success (e.g., Roundup-Ready® soybean and other crops developed and marketed by Monsanto). Because objectives are different between the public sectors (open information sources for the public good) and the private sectors (patented IP for profit), complementary collaboration between them is suggested to have the potential to achieve maximum benefits [51].
Brazil has had a rapid growth in soybean production in recent decades. A key reason is the research success in developing “tropical soybeans”; these are varieties with long juvenility or late flowering, which have enabled soybean to be grown under short-day environments from subtropical regions in the south to the tropical region in the middle and north parts of the country [52,53]. New varieties were also developed to tackle soil fertility challenges. The improvements included various biotechnological inventions. The GM crops were developed with increasing numbers of beneficial traits. The first-generation GM soybean varieties contain a single herbicide tolerance trait [54,55]. The second and third generations contain stacked traits with a combination of insect, disease and multiple-herbicide tolerance, as well as other traits, e.g., drought/salt/cold tolerance and biofortification [4]. All these soybeans contribute to a very positive economic impact on Brazil and other South American countries. Due to the importance of innovations in new varieties, the seed laws and regulations of all five top producing countries include IP protection clauses with respect to breeders and inventors. A national list of new varieties is available on each country’s designated publication site (Table 1).
Awards are granted in some countries for new cultivar inventions (Table 1). The awards given in China, coupled with a breeder evaluation system, have promoted competition among breeders to release super varieties; however, sometimes, this may cause continuing segregation of a released cultivar [56]. This undesirable situation has been addressed in the revised national “Seed Law” of China (see below). Despite award granting, the government subsidy/funding/levies, fees and taxes in some countries—such as India [57] and Argentina [58]—have been shown to have detrimental impacts on soybean farming. These policies and practices require careful review for enhancing productivity.

5. International Seed Certification and Labeling

A third-party seed certification and labeling system for the verification of the quality of every lot of seeds before trading is adopted by the USA, Brazil, Argentina and India (Table 1). On the other hand, regulations in China are mainly performed by government agencies. An administrative approval system is used in China for the release of new varieties of five major crops (rice, wheat, maize, cotton and soybean) for the commercial production of seeds for sowing. China has also issued various seed standards with which the producers will need to comply. Those in violation of these standards will be prosecuted by the regulatory bodies.
The internationally adopted seed laws and regulations define which seed tests are to be conducted, the minimum standards the seeds are required to meet, and the certified analysts and labs that can carry out the tests. The standards to be met include those that are common to all seed varieties plus those that apply to the specific soybean cultivar. The established testing methods include those by OECD, ISTA and AOSA (the Association of Official Seed Analysts, www.aosaseed.com, accessed on 8 March 2021). The AOSA methods are in line with those by ISTA and are also adopted by OECD. In China, although seed certification is not mandatory by law, seed certification standards do exist. The China GB 3543 rules are based on the ISTA 1993 methods. In terms of testing methods, all five countries follow a standardized system in general. The certification agents can be ISTA, AOSCA (U.S. Association of Official Seed Certifying Agencies, www.aosca.org, accessed on 8 March 2021) or OECD (by collaborating with the individual national designated authority [NDA]), depending on needs.
The USA mandates label accuracy. Below is an example of a typical label used by the two-leading soybean-producing states, Illinois and Iowa, in the USA [59,60]:
1. Soybean variety (name, species, common name); 2. Lot#; 3. Origin; 4. Net weight; 5. % Purity including % pure seed, % inert matter, % other crop seed, % weed seed (these four must add up to 100%); 6. % germination; 7. % dormant seed or hard seed; 8. Name of restricted noxious seeds per pound (each state has its own list of prohibited and restricted noxious weeds, and there is zero tolerance for prohibited weeds); 9. Germination test date; 10. Name and address of company responsible for analysis (on behalf of the seller or grower). Additional information such as total viability/germination may or may not be stated. An additional label may exist indicating the Certification Class of seed in a blue color. A certified seed should be the first choice for any seeding project [61].
The quantity standards vary among states and countries to suit local needs. They normally meet the minimum requirements defined by each designated certifying body. Seeds are classified into different classes and the use for each seed class is defined. All five countries apply a four-tier system (Table 1). The applicable standard for each seed class can vary.

6. Seed Regulations in China and the Implication of the Revised National “Seed Law”

In China, governmental regulation plays a central role in safeguarding seed production and utilization. China covers many landforms and climatic regions, and there is still a large portion of small-holder farmers [62]. It is important to choose the right types of varieties to grow in particular regions. Therefore, China has a stringent requirement for releasing new varieties of major crops to farmers for production, involving provincial and national approval procedures. For instance, there are several related national standards to define the evolution protocol (NY/T1299-2014), scope (DB32/T2077-2012) and seed description (DB51/T1929-2014) for soybeans. The key evaluation criteria for the approval of new soybean varieties (national level) include disease resistance, maturity group and quality (protein and oil contents). The soybeans will be further categorized into high- and stable-yield varieties, high-oil varieties, high-protein varieties and special-type varieties.
To produce seeds for sowing, China also has a series of national standards: GB4404.2-2020 involves seed quality, evaluation methods and criteria, to control seed purity (>99% for pure-breed seeds), germination rate (>85%), water content (<12%, except in high-latitude cold regions) and other seed properties; GB/T17318-2011 and DB64T1478-2017 provide operation guidelines for soybean seed production; and DB41/T997.7-2014 and DB41/T293.7-2014 define the quality standards and production procedures for four grades of soybean seeds (breeder’s original seeds, breeder’s seeds, pure-breed seeds and certified seeds). There are also additional standards for hybrid soybean seeds, for example, DB22/T2209-2014, DB14/T1423-2017, DB22/T2387-2015, DB14/T1342-2017, DB22/T2620-2017, etc.
China has highlighted “seeds” in its 14th 5-Year National Plan. Accordingly, the national “Seed Law” was revised [41] and implemented on 1 March 2022. The revised “Seed Law” aims to upgrade the utilization and protection of seed resources. There are several new developments that may bring profound impacts to seed industries, including soybean production in China.
Seed germplasms will become national properties and the government will step up in seed conservation, including through the building of seed banks for collections of important and unique seeds. The new building of the National Crop Genebank of China was completed at CAAS at the end of 2021. Its capacity is as great as 1.5 million accessions, ranking first in the world.
The approval procedure for new varieties will be strengthened. The concept of substantially derived varieties will be implemented so that new varieties cannot be simple variants of original varieties, or replication of the same concepts. In conjunction, the rights of the seed inventors will be respected so that commercial production is not allowed without the consent or licensing of the seed inventors.
Due to the urge to develop new varieties, the application of GM technology in plant breeding will be enhanced, for reasons including the establishment of more thorough safety guidelines for breeding, testing, evaluation and propagation. Since clearer guidelines will be implemented, it is expected that China will approve the commercial release of new varieties generated with GM technology, such as soybeans, in the near future.
The licensing of seed-producing companies will be tightened. New rules will be set up so that seed-trading companies will need to fulfil a set of criteria (e.g., space, manpower, seed licensing, etc.) to obtain permits for operation. Seed production should observe standards of seed quality and phytosanitary requirements. The related documentations will be monitored by regulatory bodies. This will upgrade the quality of seeds by asking the producers to bear the responsibility of following the standards.

7. Execution and Governance of Rules, Regulations and Production Systems

Seed certification and labeling involve an ample amount of information and can be complex at different stages. For the most suitable quality of seed variety to reach farmers requires well-coordinated efforts in marketing and education. Farmers need to fully understand and trust the certification process and label information to make the right choice for their successful production. A clearly designated organization with adequate central authority to oversee the whole process is critical for success. In the USA, the central authority is the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service; in Brazil, the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply; and in Argentina, the National Seed Institute. The roles and responsibilities of these organizations are well defined in the seed law.
In China, the central governing body is the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA). Regulations related to soybean are defined in detail in different mandatory and voluntary national standards (examples are given above). Under MARA, the National Agriculture Technology Extension and Service Center (NATESC) is designated to oversee the connection and coordination of the whole regulatory process. However, because many departments and organizations in different provinces are involved, a clearly defined role and responsibility with granted authority for execution for each party is critical. In particular, good coordination among various agencies/organizations is often cited as a key issue in productivity enhancement in China and India [63,64].

8. Conclusions

Soybean is an important and valuable crop for global food and feed supply with high quality nutrition. Efforts on different fronts need to be well coordinated to ensure continuously successful production. The models presented by the top five producing countries provide clues for future success considerations. The farming policy in individual countries is critical. The associated legal framework needs to have clearly defined and encompassing rules, regulations and systems. Clauses for new cultivar registration, with IP protection for developers, will encourage more innovation towards scaling up production and adapting to changing environmental conditions. Collaborations between reputable private and public sectors is favorable for leveraging strength on both sides, particularly in terms of the offerings in modern technology. A transparent seed certification and labeling system managed by a trusted authority will boost farmers’ confidence in using the seeds.
Since the soybean supply chain is detailed and complex, the execution of the rules, regulations and systems requires excellent central coordination with easy and comprehensible information access. A national designated body with a clear role and responsibility to coordinate the different stages in the supply chain is a must for success. Since farmers need to be well informed of these rules, regulations and systems in order to make wise decisions, education programs and training materials must be offered and widely publicized to them. Only farmers who have profited from their crops have the interest and will to grow more.
China’s newly revised “Seed Law” provides more protection to national seed resources and rights for new plant variety owners. The stricter new variety registration rule pledges efforts for technological breakthroughs. Clearer guidelines on GM technology application, particularly on allowing GM soybean commercial release, implies future production increases with elite varieties.
Finally, due to the significant growth in soybean production in recent years, a larger landmass is continuously required. This can lead to deforestation, particularly in the South American Amazon region. Large-scale GM soybean cultivation over the years has also generated concerns about the long-term environmental pollution and adverse impacts on biodiversity. How to balance food security concerns with sustainable future production is a problem that demands as much effort as possible, from all parties involved, to find a solution.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-P.J.C., H.-M.L., T.H. and J.G.; data curation, S.-P.J.C., M.-W.L., H.-Y.W., F.-L.W. and T.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-P.J.C.; writing—review and editing, S.-P.J.C., H.-M.L., T.H. and J.G.; supervision, H.-M.L., T.H. and J.G.; project administration, H.-M.L., T.H. and J.G.; funding acquisition, H.-M.L. and T.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology 2020 Key Areas Research and Development Programs: Breeding for High-Yield and High-Quality New Soybean varieties for Tropics and Subtropics (2020B020220008) to H.-M.L. and T.H., and by grants from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council Area of Excellence Scheme [AoE/M-403/16] and Lo Kwee-Seong Biomedical Research Fund to H.-M.L.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kam-Cheung Wong for assistance with literature collection and Jee Yan Chu for copy-editing the manuscript. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication do not reflect the views of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region or the Innovation and Technology Commission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qin, P.X.; Wang, T.R.; Luo, Y.C. A review on plant-based proteins from soybean: Health benefits and soy product development. J. Agric. Food Res. 2022, 7, 100265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shea, Z.; Singer, M.W.; Zhang, B. Soybean Production, Versatility, and Improvement. In Legume Crops—Prospects, Production and Uses; Hasanuzzaman, M., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. United States Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Service. Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade. Available online: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/oilseeds.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2022).
  4. Voora, V.; Larrea, C.; Bermúdez, S. Global Market Report: Soybeans; International Institute for Sustainable Development: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cattelan, A.J.; Dall’Agnol, A. The rapid soybean growth in Brazil. OCL 2018, 25, D102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Dlamini, T.S.; Tshabalala, P.; Mutengwa, T. Soybeans production in South Africa. OCL 2014, 21, D207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. FAO. FAO. FAO Commodities and Trade Division Basic Foodstuffs Service. In The Role of Soybean in Fighting World Hunger; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  8. Foyer, C.H.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Tai, A.P.K.; Anders, S.; Fodor, N.; Wong, F.L.; Ludidi, N.; Chapman, M.A.; Ferguson, B.J.; Considine, M.J.; et al. Modelling predicts that soybean is poised to dominate crop production across Africa. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. De Notaris, C.; Rasmussen, J.; Sorensen, P.; Olesen, J.E. Nitrogen leaching: A crop rotation perspective on the effect of N surplus, field management and use of catch crops. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 255, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fung, K.M.; Tai, A.P.K.; Yong, T.W.; Liu, X.M.; Lam, H.M. Co-benefits of intercropping as a sustainable farming method for safeguarding both food security and air quality. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 044011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, X.Y.; Tai, A.P.K.; Chen, Y.F.; Zhang, L.; Shaddick, G.; Yan, X.Y.; Lam, H.M. Dietary shifts can reduce premature deaths related to particulate matter pollution in China (vol 2, pg 997, 2021). Nat. Food 2022, 3, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. FAO. FAOSTAT. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 22 November 2021).
  13. Statista. Soybeans Import Volume Worldwide 2020/21. Available online: http://www.statista.com (accessed on 22 November 2021).
  14. Hymowitz, T. 1—The History of the Soybean. In Soybeans; Johnson, L.A., White, P.J., Galloway, R., Eds.; AOCS Press: Urbana, IL, USA, 2008; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sedivy, E.J.; Wu, F.Q.; Hanzawa, Y. Soybean domestication: The origin, genetic architecture and molecular bases. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 539–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Qiu, L.; Chang, R. The origin and history of soybean. In The Soybean: Botany, Production and Uses; Guriqbal, S., Ed.; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jamet, J.-P.; Chaumet, J.-M. Soybean in China: Adaptating to the liberalization. OCL 2016, 23, D604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Yao, H.Z.; Zuo, X.X.; Zuo, D.X.; Lin, H.; Huang, X.M.; Zang, C.F. Study on soybean potential productivity and food security in China under the influence of COVID-19 outbreak. Geogr. Sustain. 2020, 1, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, H.; Chang, J.F.; Havlik, P.; van Dijk, M.; Valin, H.; Janssens, C.; Ma, L.; Bai, Z.H.; Herrero, M.; Smith, P.; et al. China’s future food demand and its implications for trade and environment. Nat. Sustain. 2021, 4, 1042–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture—Trends and Challenges; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, J.H. China’s success in increasing per capita food production. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3707–3711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, Y.X.; Zhang, W.F.; Ma, L.; Wu, L.; Shen, J.; Davies, W.J.; Oenema, O.; Zhang, F.S.; Dou, Z.X. An analysis of China’s grain production: Looking back and looking forward. Food Energy Secur. 2014, 3, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Z.M.; Lu, C.H. Clustering Analysis of Soybean Production to Understand its Spatiotemporal Dynamics in the North China Plain. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Klumper, W.; Qaim, M. A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. MAGP (Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries AR); IICA (Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture CR). Comparative Study of Genetically Modified and Conventional Soybean Cultivation in Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay; IICA: San José, Costa Rica, 2012.
  26. Phélinas, P.; Choumert, J. Is GM Soybean Cultivation in Argentina Sustainable? World Dev. 2017, 99, 452–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Song, X.P.; Hansen, M.C.; Potapov, P.; Adusei, B.; Pickering, J.; Adami, M.; Lima, A.; Zalles, V.; Stehman, S.V.; Di Bella, C.M.; et al. Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation. Nat. Sustain. 2021, 4, 784–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Agarwal, D.K.; Billore, S.D.; Sharma, A.N.; Dupare, B.U.; Srivastava, S.K. Soybean: Introduction, Improvement, and Utilization in India-Problems and Prospects. Agr Res 2013, 2, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Islas-Rubio, A.R.; Higuera-Ciapara, I. Soybean: Post-harvest operation. In FAO InPhO—Post Harvest Compendium; Mejia, D., Lewis, B., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2002; p. 45. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sharma, P. Dynamics of Growth of Soybean in India: Role of Income and Risk. Agric. Situat. India 2016, 73, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  31. Han, T.; Zhou, X.; Guan, R.; Shu, S.; Tian, S.; Wang, S.; Yang, Z. Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow of Soybean Seed Industry. Available online: http://www.zys.moa.gov.cn/mhsh/202105/t20210513_6367666.htm (accessed on 1 January 2022). (In Chinese)
  32. ISAAA. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2016; ISAAA Brief No. 52; ISAAA: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  33. Singh, S.K. India: Agricultural Biotechnology Annual; Wallace, M., Ed.; United States Department of Agriculture—Foreign Agricultural Service—Global Agricultural Information Network: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
  34. Rosculete, E.; Bonciu, E.; Rosculete, C.A.; Teleanu, E. Detection and Quantification of Genetically Modified Soybean in Some Food and Feed Products. A Case Study on Products Available on Romanian Market. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ohyama, T.; Minagawa, R.; Ishikawa, S.; Yamamoto, M.; Hung, N.V.P.; Ohtake, N.; Sueyoshi, K.; Sato, T.; Nagumo, Y.; Takahashi, Y. Soybean Seed Production and Nitrogen Nutrition. In A Comprehensive Survey of International Soybean Research—Genetics, Physiology, Agronomy and Nitrogen Relationships, Board, J.E., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  36. Da Cunha, J.P.A.R.; de Oliveira, P.; dos Santos, C.M.; Mion, R.L. Soybean seed quality after harvesting with two types of harvester and two storage times. Cienc. Rural. 2009, 39, 1420–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. De Lima, F.B.F.; Da Silva, M.A.F.; Da Silva, R.P. Quality of Mechanical Soybean Harvesting at Two Travel Speeds. Eng. Agric. 2017, 37, 1171–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Seed Schemes—A synthesis of International Regulatory Aspects that Affect Seed Trade; OECD: Paris, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  39. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Schemes for the Varietal Certification or the Control of Seed Moving in International Trade; OECD: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  40. US Federal Seed Act. Available online: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/fsa (accessed on 22 November 2021).
  41. Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Revising the Seed Law of the People’s Republic of China. Available online: https://hk.lexiscn.com/law/content.php?provider_id=1&isEnglish=Y&origin_id=4160588&eng=0&prid=&crid=3bea136f-e96f-400c-8450-93a432aa5d08 (accessed on 27 January 2022).
  42. Argentina Seed Law. Available online: https://www.farmersrights.org/pdf/americas/Argentina/Argentina-seedandpvp73%2091.pdf (accessed on 22 November 2021).
  43. Brazil Seed Law. Available online: https://www.ecolex.org/details/legislation/law-no-10711-ruling-on-national-system-for-seeds-and-moults-lex-faoc049379/ (accessed on 22 November 2021).
  44. India Seed Bill. Available online: https://odishaseedsportal.nic.in/?lang=E (accessed on 22 November 2021).
  45. US Code of Federal Regulations. Title 7 PART 201—Federal Seed Act Requirements. Available online: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-7/subtitle-B/chapter-I/subchapter-K/part-201 (accessed on 22 November 2021).
  46. Huang, S. Analysis on the U.S. Seed Certification System and Its Enlightenment to Our Country. South. Agric. 2019, 31, 48–52. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  47. Meng, Q. 2020 Explore and practice Seed Certification system China Seed Industry 2020. Seed Ind. Manag. 2020, 5, 24. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu, W.; Zou, W.; Yan, J. Discussion on promoting seed quality certification system to improve the high-quality development of seed industry. Zhejiang Agric. Sci. 2019, 60, 697–702. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  49. Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry. Evaluation of the PPPIAD Project on Soybean; FICCI: New Delhi, India, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zheng, H.; Zhao, J.; Qin, X.; Jia, Q.; Qi, S. General situation of global crop seed industry development and its enlightenment to my country’s seed industry development. Chin. Eng. Sci. Bull. Chin. Acad. Eng. 2021, 4, 45–55. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  51. King, J.; Toole, A.A.; Fuglie, K. The Complementary Roles of the Public and Private Sectors in U.S. Agricultural Research and Development; United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
  52. Hou, Z.; Liu, B.; Kong, F. Chapter Two—Regulation of flowering and maturation in soybean. In Advances in Botanical Research; Lam, H.-M., Li, M.-W., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; Volume 102, pp. 43–75. [Google Scholar]
  53. Li, M.W.; Lam, H.M. The Modification of Circadian Clock Components in Soybean During Domestication and Improvement. Front. Genet. 2020, 11, 571188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Duke, S.O. Perspectives on transgenic, herbicide-resistant crops in the United States almost 20 years after introduction. Pest Manag. Sci. 2015, 71, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Duke, S.O.; Cerdeira, A.L. Transgenic Crops for Herbicide Resistance. In Transgenic Crop Plants; Kole, C., Michler, C.H., Abbott, A.G., Hall, T.C., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 133–166. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hu, R.; Huang, J.; Xiang, C. China’s seed industry: Development, challenges and policy. Forum Sci. Technol. China 2010, 12, 123–128. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sharma, P.; Dupare, B.; Patel, R. Technology adoption, its impact and determinants: The case of soybean in Madhya Pradesh. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev. 2018, 31, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Meade, B.; Puricelli, E.; McBride, W.; Valdes, C.; Hoffman, L.; Foreman, L.; Dohlman, E. Corn and Soybean Production Costs and Export Competitiveness in Argentina, Brazil, and the United States; EIB-154; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2016.
  59. Illinois Crop Improvement Association. Illinois Crop Improvement Association Handbook of Seed Certification; Illinois Crop Improvement Association: Champaign, IL, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  60. Iowa Crop Improvement Association. Iowa Seed Certification Requirements Handbook; Iowa Crop Improvement Association: Ames, IA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  61. Englert, J.M. A Simplifed Guide to Understand Seed Labels. In Maryland Plant Materials Technical Note No. 2; USDA-NRCS National Plant Materials Center: Beltsville, MD, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  62. Liu, Y.; Duan, M.; Yu, Z. Agricultural landscapes and biodiversity in China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 166, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dupare, B.; Billore, s.D.; Joshi, O. Farmers’ Problems Associated with Cultivation of Soybean in Madhya Pradesh, India. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2010, 4, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  64. Xu, Y.; Fu, A.; Chen, G. Difficulties and countermeasures in the development of China’s seed industry. China Seed Ind. 2021, 11, 13–17. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Agriculture 12 00624 g001 550
Figure 1. Soybean production in the five major soybean-producing countries from 1961 to 2021. Data from 1961–2019 were retrieved from FAOstat (https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/) on 1 February 2022. Data from 2020 were retrieved from USDA (https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer/Default.aspx) on 1 March 2022.
Figure 1. Soybean production in the five major soybean-producing countries from 1961 to 2021. Data from 1961–2019 were retrieved from FAOstat (https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/) on 1 February 2022. Data from 2020 were retrieved from USDA (https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer/Default.aspx) on 1 March 2022.
Agriculture 12 00624 g001
Agriculture 12 00624 g002 550
Figure 2. Production volumes of soybean in the top 10 producing countries/regions in 2021. Data were retrieved from USDA (https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer/Default.aspx) on 1 March 2022.
Figure 2. Production volumes of soybean in the top 10 producing countries/regions in 2021. Data were retrieved from USDA (https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/cropexplorer/Default.aspx) on 1 March 2022.
Agriculture 12 00624 g002
Agriculture 12 00624 g003 550
Figure 3. Soybean production supply chain.
Figure 3. Soybean production supply chain.
Agriculture 12 00624 g003
Table
Table 1. Overview of soybean seed laws, rules, regulations and systems by country.
Table 1. Overview of soybean seed laws, rules, regulations and systems by country.
The USAChinaArgentinaBrazilIndia
Seed LawFederal Seed Act [40]PRC Seed Law [41]Law No. 20247/73 on Seed and Phytogenetic Creations [42]LAW No. 10.711 [43]Seed Bill [44]
Initial Promulgation Year19402000 (amended in 2021)197319781966
Central GoverningUSDA AMSMARA
NATESC		MAGyP, INASE, CONASEMAPA, Consultative Seeds and Seedlings CommissionsMinistry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Central Seed Committee
New variety R&D
Public Sector 		USDA,
State Agricultural Experiment Stations		Nanjing Agricultural University, CAAS, HAAS, etc.CONICET, INTA, UniversitiesEmbrapaICAR, IISR
New Variety R&D
Private Sector		Corteva AgrisciencesShandong Shofine Seeds Technology Co.,
Beidahuang Kenfeng Seed Co., Syngenta 		ADM, Criadero Santa Rosa, othersSLC Agricola, AMAGGI,
BOM FUTURO, Terra Santa, others		Krishidhan Seeds Pvt. Ltd.,
Eagle Seeds, Bombay Super Hybrid Seeds Limited
National Variety Registration and List
(IP Protection)		National list based on Plant Variety Protection certification database, plant patents, utility patentsNational list based on Regulation of Protection of New Varieties of Plants and MeasuresNational Catalog of Cultivars based on National Register of Cultivars on Article 9 of seed law, National Register of Cultivar OwnershipNational registration of Seeds and Seedlings (RENASEM), National Registration of Cultivars (RNC), National Registry of Registered Cultivars (CNCR), Plant Variety Protection Law No. 9.456National Register of Seeds, The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmer’s Rights Act
Rewards for New Variety DevelopedNoYesYesNoYes
Seed ClassificationBreeder,
Foundation,
Registered,
Certified		Breeder’s original seeds,
Breeder’s seeds,
Pure-breed seeds,
Certified seeds,		Original (basic or initial),
Certified (Registered) 1st propagation,
Certified subsequent propagation 2 and 3,
Identified certified 		Basic,
1st generation certified C1,
2nd generation certified C2,
Supervised S1 and S2		Breeder,
Foundation Stage I,
Foundation Stage II,
Certified
Seed Testing MethodsAOSCA, ISTAGB 3543 Rules for agricultural seed testing (based on ISTA rule 1993)OECD, ISTA, AOSCA,
National Inspection for Exclusive Export Destination		OECD, AOSCA, ISTAOECD, ISTA
Seed Certification StandardsSeed law of each state varies. General seed and specific standards for soybeans applied.GB 4404.2 Seed of food crops—part 2: LegumeThe Resolutions of the Secretary of Agriculture, Livestock and Fish of Argentina N°2270-93 Tolerances for soybean seed and other species.MAPA in Normative Instruction No. 45, 17 December 2013 ANNEX XXIII Standards for the production and marketing of soybean seeds (Glycine Max L.), general and specifics.INDIAN min seed certification standards (general and specific)
Seed Testing Technician CertificationCertified Seed Analyst (AOS)
Certified Seed Technologist (SCST)		List of qualified Agricultural Seed InspectorsList of Accredited InspectorsAccredited TechniciansAccredited Seed Analysts
Seed Testing Labs CertificationOECD Accreditation Program
46 AOSCA seed certifying agency
USDA ASL
7 ISTA-accredited labs		2 ISTA-accredited labs
Seed quality testing agency approved by MARA		1 ISTA-accredited lab (The Central Laboratory for Seed Analysis)2 ISTA-accredited labs
List of seed and seed analysis labs accredited in RENASEM		6 ISTA-accredited labs
Central and state seed testing laboratory
Seed Certification BodyAOSCA, ISTA, OECDMARA-approved Crop Seed Quality Testing InstitutionsINASEMAPA and its accredited legal entitiesState Seed Certification Agencies appointed by Central Seed Committee
Certification SystemOECD Seed Schemes (Soybean)
AOSCA system
Federal Seed Analysis Certificates		State standard (GB) enforced by competent agriculture and forestry departmentsOECD Seed Scheme (Soybean)
AOSCA system
National Inspection system with Exclusive Export Destination		OECD Seed Scheme (Soybean)
AOSCA system		OECD Seed Schemes (Soybean)
ISTA Certification
Seed Label ContentsVariety and kind,
Net weight,
% Germination,
% Purity,
% Dormant or hard seeds,
% Inert matter,
% Other crop seed,
% Weed seed,
Name of noxious weeds,
Lot number, Origin, Test date, Name/Address, Tag color for quality		Variety and kind,
Net weight,
% Germination,
% Purity,
% Moisture,
Variety registration number,
Standards applied, Suitable planting area and season, License number, Test date and expiration period		Cultivar Name (common and botanical name),
Net contents,
% Germination,
% Purity,
% Weeds,
Seed classification,
Name/Address, Registration number of the certifier and seller, Harvest year 		Cultivar Name and category,
Net weight,
% Germination,
% Purity,
Seed classification,
Information required by specific standards
Batch number, Name/address and registration number of the seed producer,
Validity month/year of the germination test		Name and variety,
Net contents,
% Germination,
% Purity,
% Inert matter,
Seed classification,
Lot number, Name/Address of producing institution, Date of test, Tag color for quality
Label Governing BodyUSDA AMSMARA supervision and spot check of agricultural seed qualityINASEMAPADA&FW,
Central Seed Certification Board
Label RegulationFederal Seed Act, relative regulations, state seed lawsGeneral directiveThe Law of Seeds and Phylogenetic Creations No. 20247 /73 and its Regulatory Decree No. 2183/91.DECREE No. 5153, OF 23 July 2004Seed Rule 1968 PART V—Marking or Labelling
Abbreviations: ADM—Asociados Don Mario; AMS—Agricultural Marketing Service; AOSCA—Association of Official Seed Certifying Agencies; ASL—Accredited Seed Laboratory; CAAS—Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences; CONASE—Comisión Nacional de Semillas (National Seed Commission); CONICET—Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (National Scientific and Technical Research Council); DA&FW—Department of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare; Embrapa—Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Brazillian Agricultural Research Corporation); ICAR—Indian Council of Agricultural Research; ICS—Institute of Crop Sciences; IISR—Indian Institute of Soybean Research; INASE—Instituto Nacional de Semillas (National Seed Institute); INTA—Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (National Institute of Agricultural Technology); ISTA—International Seed Testing Association; MAGyP—Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca (Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries); MAPA—Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Supply); MARA—Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; NATESC—National Agriculture Technology Extension Service Center; OECD—Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; PRC—People’s Republic of China; USDA—US Department of Agriculture; USPTO—US Patent and Trademark Office.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, S.-P.J.; Li, M.-W.; Wong, H.-Y.; Wong, F.-L.; Wu, T.; Gai, J.; Han, T.; Lam, H.-M. The Seed Quality Assurance Regulations and Certification System in Soybean Production—A Chinese and International Perspective. Agriculture 2022, 12, 624. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050624

AMA Style

Chen S-PJ, Li M-W, Wong H-Y, Wong F-L, Wu T, Gai J, Han T, Lam H-M. The Seed Quality Assurance Regulations and Certification System in Soybean Production—A Chinese and International Perspective. Agriculture. 2022; 12(5):624. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050624

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Shwu-Pyng Joanna, Man-Wah Li, Ho-Yan Wong, Fuk-Ling Wong, Tingting Wu, Junyi Gai, Tianfu Han, and Hon-Ming Lam. 2022. "The Seed Quality Assurance Regulations and Certification System in Soybean Production—A Chinese and International Perspective" Agriculture 12, no. 5: 624. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050624

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop