Next Article in Journal
Nondestructive Detection of Microcracks in Poultry Eggs Based on the Electrical Characteristics Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Pre-Sowing Laser Light Stimulation Increases Yield and Protein and Crude Fat Contents in Soybean
Previous Article in Journal
Biochar Enhances Plant Growth, Fruit Yield, and Antioxidant Content of Cherry Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in a Soilless Substrate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rhizobium and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Influence the Soil Nutrient Availability, Growth, Yield, and Quality of Soybean

1
Department of Agronomy, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka 1207, Bangladesh
2
Soil Science Division, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur 1701, Bangladesh
3
UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2022, 12(8), 1136; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081136
Submission received: 16 June 2022 / Revised: 26 July 2022 / Accepted: 28 July 2022 / Published: 31 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Production of Legumes and Oil Crops)

Abstract

:
Crop production encounters challenges due to the dearth of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P), while excessive use of chemical fertilizers causes environmental hazards. Use of rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) can be a sustainable strategy to overcome these problems. Hence, a pot experiment was conducted following a completely randomized design to explore the impact of nitrogen fixing bacteria and PSB on the growth, yield, and quality attributes of soybean alongside soil nutrient availability using Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata. The experiment consisted of two factors—R. japonicum (100% N, R. japonicum alone or with 50% N and control) and P. striata (100% P, P. striata with 75% P and control). Results revealed a significant influence of interaction on seed N, yield, protein, oil, and nodules of soybean. Microbial inoculants with or without N and P fertilizers produced a statistically similar yield as 100% N and P. Furthermore, R. japonicum and P. striata along with 50% N and 75% P increased 7% protein and 19% oil than 100% N and P. R. japonicum enhanced soil N content and P. striata improved soil phosphorus availability. Overall, R. japonicum and P. striata inoculation with 50% N and 75% P can potentially improve the yield and the quality of soybean and soil nutrient conditions.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen and phosphorus play a crucial role in the growth and the development of soybean plants. Nitrogen is an indispensable part of amino acid, protein, chlorophyll, and many essential enzymes critical for photosynthesis and plant growth [1]. It is also necessary for partitioning photosynthate, stimulating root growth and enhancing uptake of other nutrients by plants [2]. On the contrary, another macronutrient, P has the utmost importance for pod formation and seed development in soybean [3]. It also plays an imperative role in photosynthesis, enzyme activation, ATP formation, energy transfer, metabolism of carbohydrates, and cell division [4]. Therefore, farmers use excessive N and P fertilizers to maintain high agricultural productivity. However, plants can use only 30–40% of these fertilizers and the rest is lost to soil and water, which is a big threat to the environment [5]. To check this environmental issue, eco-friendly and sustainable sources of nutrients should be used, reducing the necessity of synthetic fertilizers [6].
Hence, application of microbial inoculants as biofertilizers has emerged as a cost-effective, environment-friendly, remunerative, and sustainable strategy to boost soil fecundity and crop growth [7,8]. The interaction between plants and microorganisms such as rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) can reduce reliance on N and P [9]. Rhizobium and PSB have shown added benefit in legume cultivation by fixing N and solubilizing unavailable P [10]. Being a member of the Fabaceae family, soybean can build a symbiotic association with rhizobium, which converts atmospheric N2 into a useable form for plants [11]. With the help of symbiosis, the soybean can fix up to 200–250 kg N ha−1 [12], which is less prone to leaching loss and volatilization [5]. Biologically fixed N reduces production costs and protects the environment from the harmful effects of nitrogenous chemical fertilizer [13]. Previous studies documented that soybean requires up to 80 kg N per 1000 kg seeds depending on soil conditions to maintain optimum productivity [14] and approximately 80% of it is contributed by biologically fixed N [15]. However, in-built soil N-fixing bacteria is not sufficient to fix enough N [16]. That’s why inoculating a rhizobial strain with seeds can be a cost-effective, environment-friendly, profitable, and sustainable strategy to supply N to plants [1]. A significant increase in plant growth and the yield of soybean because of seed inoculation with rhizobium was recorded by Zohaib et al. [16].
Additionally, the left-over nitrogen found in soil after the soybean crop harvest is equal to 30–80 kg N fertilizer per hectare, which is beneficial for the next crop [17]. Moreover, the biologically fixed N is sometimes inadequate for plants’ growth and development [18]. To optimize yield, soybean needs biologically fixed N and N uptake by roots [19]. An exogenous supply of N as a starter dose during seedling development until the nodulation stage is critical for soybean to ensure optimal production [20]. Hardy et al. [21] documented the beneficent impact of applying N fertilizer before planting on the early vegetative growth of soybean until root nodules are formed.
Furthermore, rhizobium requires P to drive energy for atmospheric N fixation and nodule formation [22]. Phosphorus also provides enough infection sites for rhizobium by promoting root growth [23]. Phosphorus assists rhizobium in building the mitochondrial and symbiosomal membranes of nodules and assimilation of ammonium as amino acids [24]. Mitran et al. [25] revealed a positive relationship between nodular P content and N fixation in legumes. Insufficient P impedes root growth and hinders photosynthesis and the accumulation and translocation of photosynthates and other functions directly related to biological N fixation [22]. Although soil contains a fair amount of P, it usually forms compounds with calcium, magnesium, and other minerals and becomes fixed in the soil [26]. Only 15–20% of soil applied P remains available to plants [27]. The mineralization and the solubilization of fixed organic P are performed by PSB [28]. PSB solubilizes the organic P by secreating various organic acids and enzymes [29], improves legume yield, and reduces dependency on organic and inorganic sources of P fertilizer [30]. Gaur et al. [31] documented the solubilization of approximately 30–40 kg P2O5 ha−1 due to inoculation of PSB. In addition, PSB produces plant growth hormone especially auxin and stimulates plant growth [32]. An increment of 23%, 15%, and 16% in nodules number per plant, grain yield and protein content were recorded in chickpea by Ditta et al. [33] due to PSB inoculation, respectively.
Besides, dual inoculation of beneficial microbes was proven to be more effectual than single inoculation considering crop growth and yield [34]. The combined application of rhizobium and PSB has an augmented effect on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, root growth, and in turn the yield of soybean.
In Bangladesh, soybean oil is the most popular edible oil but farmers produce only 5% of total demand [35]. The major reason behind this scenario may be the farmers’ preference for other crops. But soybean has great potential in Bangladesh as it is the crop with the richest source of protein [36], and it requires less fertilizer, reducing the input cost. Previously neglected, soybean cultivation is now gaining popularity due to the availability of high-yielding, short-duration varieties and a suitable climatic condition [37]. Farmers will be more encouraged if they can reduce production costs by using biofertilizer such as rhizobium and PSB, which will also benefit the environment. In our experiment, we investigated the efficacy of nitrogen fixing bacteria (R. japonicum) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (P. striata) to provide necessary N and P to soybean plants and to improve their growth, yield, and quality. We assumed that R. japonicum and P. striata with a reduced amount of N and P fertilizers as a starter dose would perform better than recommended N and P fertilizer doses. The present study aimed to explore the comparative effect of R. japonicum and P. striata inoculants with or without a reduced amount of synthetic N and P fertilizers on the growth, yield, and quality of soybean. The experiment also compared the effectiveness of microbial inoculants with chemical fertilizer on nodulation and the nutritional status of soil and plants.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Setup

A pot experiment was conducted in the net house from January to April of 2021 to evaluate the impact of seed inoculation with Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on the growth, yield, and quality of soybean as well as soil nutrient availability. The experiment was laid out in a factorial completely randomized design and replicated three times. Twelve treatment combinations were used comprising four rhizobium treatments namely, R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N (as recommended for soybean in FRG [38] without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, and R3: only R. japonicum inoculant and three treatments for Pseudomonas viz. P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P (as recommended for soybean in FRG [38]) without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. The pot (88 cm × 33 cm × 23 cm) was filled with 35 kg of soil, and BARI Soybean-5 was grown as a test crop. Seeds were collected from Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Gazipur. Seeds were sown at a row to row distance of 30 cm. After 15 days, thinning was done to make the plants in a row approximately 5 cm apart from each other.

2.2. Initial and Post-Harvest Soil Analysis

For the pot experiment, soil from unexploited land in Kodda, Gazipur, Bangladesh, was used. The selected site belongs to the Salna series under the Bangladesh Agro-ecological zone 28, Madhupur Tract. The site has a general soil type of shallow red brown terrace soil with sandy clay loam texture under the taxonomical class of Ultic Ustochrepts [39]. Before the beginning of the experiment, soil samples were collected from 10 random spots of the selected site at a depth of 0–15 cm to analyze chemical properties. Then, a composite soil sample was prepared for analysis by air-drying, grinding, and sieving by a 2 mm sieve. The status of initial soil before beginning the experiment was presented in Table 1. After crop harvest, a soil sample was collected from each pot, and the post-harvest soil nitrogen and phosphorus were estimated from the average of three repetitions of each treatment. The soil pH was detected by the method proposed by Mehmood et al. [40] and soil organic carbon by Walkley and Black [41]. Soil organic matter was calculated by multiplying organic carbon with conversion factor 2 as mentioned by Douglas [42]. Available phosphorus, potassium, and sulphur were determined according to the method described by Olsen et al. [43], Brown and Lilleland [44], and Victor and Nearpass [45], respectively.

2.3. Application of Bio-Fertilizer and Chemical Fertilizer

Two peat soil based biofertilizers were used in this experiments, one for Rhizobium japonicum and another for Pseudomonas striata. Both biofertilizers contained approximately 1 × 108 cells per gram of soil. The R. japonicum strain was collected from the nodules of a soybean plant and cultured and stored in Yeast Manitol Agar media (1 liter media contains mannitol—10 g, K2HPO4—0.5 g, MgSO4·7H2O—0.2 g, NaCl—0.1 g, yeast—0.5 g, and agar—15 g) at 4 °C for 2 months before being used in peat based biofertilizer. On the other hand, P. striata strains were isolated from the rhizospheric soil of mungbean and grown and stored in Pikovskaya’s Agar media (10 g glucose, 5 g Ca3(PO4)2, 0.5 g (NH4)2SO4, 0.2 g KCl, 0.1 g MgSO4.7H2O, 0.5 g yeast extract, 15 g agar powder and a trace amount of MgSO4 and FeSO4 for 1 liter) at 4 °C for 1 month before use. Seeds were treated with Rhizobium japonicum inoculant and Pseudomonas striata inoculant at 20 g kg−1 seed before sowing. Except for nitrogen and phosphorus, all the nutrients were supplied as per the recommended fertilizer dose [38]. Nitrogen and phosphorus were applied according to the treatment requirement, where 2.45 g urea and 5.25 g triple superphosphate were equivalent to 100% N and 100% P, respectively. In addition, approximately 3.5 g of muriate of potash, 6.9 g gypsum, 0.16 g zinc sulphate, and 0.10 g boric acid were supplied during the final soil preparation for the recommended dose of 50-18-1-0.5 kg ha−1 KSZnB. All the fertilizers were incorporated with soil during final land preparation.

2.4. Data Collection

Data on plant height, leaf area index, total chlorophyll content, number of branches plant−1, number of pods plant−1, number of seeds pod−1, and 100-seed weight were recorded. At maturity, five plants were selected to measure plant height, number of branches plant−1, and number of pods plant−1. Leaf area was determined with the help of a leaf area meter, and the leaf area index was calculated using Watson’s formula [46].
Leaf   area   index = Leaf   area Ground   area
The methods described by Arnon [47] and Zohaib et al. [16] were followed to measure the total chlorophyll content of fresh leaves at 60 days after sowing (DAS). For measuring chlorophyll content, 0.5 g of fresh green leaves was chopped into small pieces and 5 mL of 80% acetone was used to extract chlorophyll. The extract was then centrifuged for 5 min at a speed corresponding to 14,000× g. Finally, the absorbance of a supernatant at 645 nm and 663 nm was recorded and total chlorophyll content was calculated using the formula provided by Zohaib et al. [16]. Two plants were uprooted from each pot to calculate the number of nodules and nodule dry weight (mg plant−1) at 30, 50, and 70 DAS. For determining dry weight, nodules were dried in an oven for 72 h at 65 °C and the constant weight was measured. Seeds were harvested from 60 cm × 33 cm of each pot and the yield was converted into t ha−1. Meanwhile, the number of seeds pod−1 and 100-seed weight were also determined. Shoot was fine-ground and digested in acid to measure the phosphorus content by Jones and Case [48]. The nitrogen percentage of shoot, nodules, and seeds, was determined by the Official Methods of Analysis, AOAC [49] recommended standard: the Micro-Kjeldahl method. In this method, approximately 1 g of ground sample was taken in a digestion tube and 15 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid and 4 g of catalyst mixer were added. Then, the sample was digested at 380 °C for 120 min and nitrogen present in the sample was converted to ammonium sulphate. After digestion, the sample was allowed to cool for 20 min and diluted with 50 mL of distilled water. A total of 60 mL of 50% sodium hydroxide solution was added after putting the digested sample in a distillation unit to convert the ammonium sulfate to ammonia. The distillate was then collected in a flask containing 25 mL boric acid solution and titrated with HCl for quantitative estimation. Nitrogen percentage was then calculated using the following equation:
Nitrogen   ( % ) in   the   sample = 1.4 × mL   of   HCl   used   in   the   titration   × Normality   of   HCl Weight   of   the   sample   ( g )
The nitrogen content of seeds was multiplied by protein factor 6.25 as described by FAO [50] for estimating seed protein. For determining oil content, 50 soybean seeds from each plot were ground to a fine powder and 20 mg of each powdered sample were taken to a 10 mL glass tube. After that, fatty acid methyl ester solution was prepared by adding 2 mL of 5% sulfuric acid-methanol, 25 μL of 0.2% butylated hydroxytoluene, 300 μL methylbenzene, and 100 μL of methyl heptadecanoate (2.5–5 mg mL−1). The preparation was then kept in a water bath at 90–95 °C for 1.5 h and cooled to room temperature. After adding 1 mL 0.9% sodium chloride and 1 mL n-hexane, the methods and the formula described by Yao et al. [51] were followed to perform a gas chromatography analysis and to measure oil content.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistix 10 (analytical software, 2105 Miller Landing Road, Tallahassee, version 10.0.1.5), a software package, was utilized to accomplish the factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). The level of significance was determined considering the p-value of ANOVA. When the p value was ˂0.05, multiple comparisons of treatment means were performed using Tukey’s HSD test.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Attributes

Plant height and number of branches plant−1 were significantly influenced by the sole effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata (p < 0.01) (Table 2). In contrast, the interaction effect became significant for leaf area index and total chlorophyll content of leaf (p < 0.05) (Table 3). Inoculation of R. japonicum with 50% of recommended N fertilizer produced the tallest plant and the highest number of branches plant−1, which was significantly higher from the data obtained for only R. japonicum inoculant and control treatment (no N and R. japonicum). On the other hand, 75% of recommended P along with P. striata provided maximum plant height and number of branches. At 30 DAS, both R1P2 (100% recommended nitrogen and 75% recommended P with P. striata) and R2P2 (application of 50% N and 75% P and seed inoculation with R. japonicum and P. striata) provided a maximum leaf area index (LAI), which was statistically similar with R1P1, R2P1, R3P1, and R3P2. The lowest LAI was recorded from zero N and P fertilizers and no microbial inoculation, which was statistically similar with other treatments except R1P1, R2P1, and R2P2. Similar findings for an interaction effect on LAI were noted at 60 DAS. A significant difference was observed for total chlorophyll content at 60 DAS due to various treatment combinations. Seed inoculation with R. japonicum and P. striata and application of 50% N and 75% P produced 47% higher chlorophyll in fresh leaves compared to no inoculation and no N and P.

3.2. Yield and Yield Contributing Characters

Rhizobium and PSB significantly affected pod length and 100-seed weight (p < 0.01, Table 4). Pod length ranged from 3.66 cm to 5.11 cm due to different Rhizobium treatments and 4.03 cm to 4.72 cm due to Pseudomonas treatments. The longest pod was given by 50% of recommended N with Rhizobium japonicum inoculant, while 75% P and Pseudomonas striata produced that which was longest. An 18% increase in seed weight was observed due to the application of 50% N with R. japonicum, while the increase was 12% for 75% P and P. striata inoculation. Treatment combinations significantly impacted the number of pods plant−1, number of seeds pod−1, and seed yield (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). R. japonicum and P. striata (R2P2) inoculation with 50% N and 75% P produced a maximum number of pods plant−1 (28.87) and seeds pod−1 (4.36), which was statistically similar to R1P2 and R2P1. No N and P fertilizers and no microbial inoculation provided a minimum value for these two parameters. Seed yield was significantly varied due to R. japonicum and P. striata interaction. A combination of 50% N + R. japonicum and 75% P + P. striata produced a 60% higher yield than control (zero N and P with no R. japonicum and P. striata), but yield was statistically insignificant with the treatments of 100% N and P and only R. japonicum and P. striata inoculant.

3.3. Protein and Oil Content

Significant impact of treatment combinations was noted in the case of protein and oil content (p < 0.01, Figure 4 and Figure 5). The highest protein content (42.97%) and oil (20.99%) were recorded when the seed was treated with Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata inoculant, and 50% N and 75% P were applied. The minimum protein and oil content was found due to the combined effect of zero nitrogen with no R. japonicum and zero phosphorus with no P. striata. An approximate increase in protein content of 18% and 7% was observed due to the application of R. japonicum and P. striata with 50% N and 75% P compared to the control (no R. japonicum and P. striata inoculation and no N and P) and the use of a recommended dose of N and P without inoculation, respectively. On the other hand, using R. japonicum and P. striata with a reduced amount of N and P (50% N and 75% P) provided 19% and 25% more oil than the recommended dose of N and P without inoculation and control treatment.

3.4. Nodulation

Interaction of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata inoculation along with application of N and P brought about notable variations in nodule numbers plant−1 (Figure 6), while individual effects became significant for dry weight and the nitrogen content of nodule (Table 5). A gradual increase in nodule numbers and in the dry weight of nodules was observed from 30 DAS to 50 DAS, but a decline for both the parameters was recorded at 70 DAS. At all the sampling date, combined treatments of 50% N + R. japonicum and 75% P + P. striata provided a maximum number of nodules per plant, which was statistically similar to the nodule numbers produced due to a combination of 50% N + R. japonicum and 100% recommended P dose. The minimum number of nodules was observed due to the combination of control treatments (no N + no R. japonicum and no P + no P. striata). At 30, 50, and 70 DAS, even the recommended N and P dose without R. japonicum and P. striata inoculation considerably reduced nodule formation, which was 42%, 38%, and 41% lower than the nodules formed due to the application of 50% N + R. japonicum and 75% P + P. striata. At 30, 50, and 70 DAS, R. japonicum inoculation with seeds and 50% N produced the maximum nodule dry weight, followed by the dry weight caused by 100% N and only R. japonicum inoculant (Table 5). Nodules contained approximately 28% more nitrogen when R. japonicum was inoculated and 50% N was applied compared to the control. In case of P. striata, 75% P with P. striata inoculation caused maximum dry weight and nitrogen content in nodules, but no significant variations were observed with 100% P.

3.5. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Content in Post-Harvest Soil and Plant

Analysis of post-harvest plant samples revealed a significant sole effect of Rhizobium japonicum on shoot N and seed P content (p < 0.01). In contrast, a significant impact of Pseudomonas striata on shoot P and seed P content was observed (p < 0.01, Table 6). The effect of R. japonicum on Shoot P was proven insignificant (p > 0.05), while shoot N was not significantly influenced by P. striata (p > 0.05). The highest N content in shoot and P content of seed was recorded for 50% N + R. japonicum, which was statistically at par with results found due to inoculation of only R. japonicum. In comparison with the control treatment, 2.08 times higher shoot N and 1.38 times higher seed P were recorded due to R. japonicum inoculation with 50% N. On the contrary, 75% P + P. striata provided approximately 40% and 48% more P in shoot and seed, respectively, than no P. striata + no P. Seed nitrogen content was significantly influenced by the combined effect of R. japonicum and P. striata (Figure 7). A combination of treatments, 50% N + R. japonicum and 75% P + P. striata gave a maximum nitrogen content in seed which was 23% higher compared with control treatment combinations (no N + no R. japonicum and no P + no P. striata). The amount of nitrogen in post-harvest soil was significantly influenced by the sole effect of R. japonicum treatments, while soil P was impacted due to the individual effect of various P. striata treatments (Table 7). In the case of 50% N + R. japonicum, the post-harvest soil N content reached its maximum value, which was approximately 60% higher than with no R. japonicum inoculation and no N. On the other hand, soil P became 2.06 times more available when P. striata was used with 75% P as compared with no P. striata and no P.

4. Discussion

Plant-microbe interaction has a crucial impact on various soil biochemical processes related to nutrient availability and uptake by plants, which contributes to plants’ growth and yield [52]. Thus, microbial inoculants also curtail chemical fertilizer use and contribute to sustainable agricultural productivity [53]. Our study intended to investigate the impact of nitrogen fixing bacteria (Rhizobium japonicum) and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (Pseudomonas striata) on the growth, yield, and quality of soybean. In addition, we explored the nodulation and post-harvest soil and the plant’s nutrient status. Individually inoculation of R. japonicum with 50% N and P. striata with 75% P provided maximum plant height, number of branches plant−1, pod length, and 100-test weight (Table 2). In contrast, leaf area index, chlorophyll content, pods plant−1, seeds pod−1, and seed yield were influenced due to their combined effect (Table 3, Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). Inoculation of R. japonicum and P. striata strains with or without N and P containing chemical fertilizers increased the LAI and the chlorophyll. The synergistic effect of these microorganisms triggered chlorophyll production by increasing the supply of nitrogen to the plant, a vital structural unit of chlorophyll [16]. Furthermore, biological nitrogen fixation by Rhizobium and phosphate solubilization by PSB (phosphate solubilizing bacteria) increased plant N and P availability, which escalated the leaf area and, consequently, LAI [54]. Stimulated plant growth was also documented in chickpea [10] and soybean [55] due to plant growth promoting microorganisms, Rhizobium, and PSB. On one hand, the combined effect of Rhizobium and PSB provided an approximately 10% higher yield than the yield obtained from the use of recommended N and P fertilizers and, on the other hand, reduced 50% of N and 25% of P fertilizer requirements. Moreover, seed inoculation with R. japonicum and P. striata without any N and P fertilizers produced equal yield as recommended N and P, which was evidence that the N fixing ability of R. japonicum made legumes less dependent on chemical fertilizers than non-leguminous plants [56]. In actual fact, a higher amount of nitrogen discourages nodulation and N fixation as well as triggers nodule senescence, which ultimately reduces seed yield [57]. On the contrary, a decreased amount of N than the recommended dose as a basal dose may help the early growth stage of soybean before building symbiosis with Rhizobium japonicum [58], which in turn unveiled in yield contributing attributes. Singh et al. [12] reported a 14.9% increase in the seed yield of soybean due to the application of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and stated the N-fixation and growth regulators (auxin, gibberellin and cytokinin etc.) production ability of Rhizobium as contributor to the growth and yield of soybean. On the other hand, PSB also stimulates the auxin and cytokinin production and makes inaccessible P available to plants, confirmed by Qureshi et al. [59] and Figueiredo et al. [60]. Enhanced cell division and cell elongation due to growth hormone auxin and gibberellin contribute to pod length, biomass production and yield [61]. Mahanty et al. [62] also reported enhanced plant growth and yield due to Rhizobium and Pseudomonas inoculation. Rhizobium strains fix atmospheric nitrogen by forming nodules and contribute to soil fertility and crop yield as biologically fixed nitrogen is more sustainable and less prone to leaching and volatilization loss [63]. Basu et al. [64] opined that N fixing and PSB improved plant growth and yield by providing nutrients without additional chemical fertilizers input. Yousefi et al. [65] observed significant positive impact on wheat plant growth and yield parameters due to the application of PSB with approximately 52%, and 26% increase in shoot biomass and yield, respectively compared to no PSB. PSB increases plant’s P use efficiency and makes it available as inorganic form [66]. Post-harvest plant sample analysis revealed significant influence of combined effect of R. japonicum and P. striata with or without chemical N and P fertilizers on seed nitrogen, protein and oil content (Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 7) which was also confirmed by Waghmare et al. [67], Jaga and Sharma [68]. Seed nitrogen and protein content increased due to R. japonicum and P. striata inoculation compared to uninoculated treatments because P. striata provided available P required for physiological and developmental process of plants and consequently increased the uptake of N by seed [69]. In a point of fact, R. japonicum and P. striata stimulate root growth which results in an enhanced root system with more root hairs, greater surface area and consequently higher uptake and acquisition of nutrients by plants [70,71,72]. Ahmad et al. [30] showed enhanced nodulation and nutritional status of mungbean due to co-inoculation of Rhizobium and PSB. However, interaction was not significant for shoot N and P and seed P (p value > 0.05). Filipini et al. [73] observed higher nitrogen content in common beans due to Rhizobium inoculation. Estrada-Bonilla et al. [74] reported the presence of higher amount of P in sugarcane shoot due to the inoculation of PSB compared to no inoculation. In contrast, in a field experiment, significant increase in seed yield, nitrogen and protein percentage of seed due to PSB inoculation was also documented by Wang et al. [75] in case of peanuts. Ditta et al. [33] reported approximately 42% and 16% increase in protein and P content of chickpea seed due to PSB. An increment in soil N and available P was also noted due to the addition of R. japonicum and P. striata, respectively (Table 7), which might be the consequence of better nodulation and improved rhizospheric environment [76]. In general, nutrient elements, N and P persist in soil as organic forms or are lost by volatilization and leaching [52]. Plants rely on microorganisms whose active metabolic activity initiates the mineralization and makes these nutrients available [53]. Sindhu et al. [77] found N content in post-harvest soil equivalent to approximately 30–80 kg of N fertilizer application, while Gour et al. [31] reported the solubilization of approximately 30–35 kg P2O5 and increased P uptake by plant due to PSB. These results also corroborate with Tagore et al. [10], who found 2.35 times more release of P from rock phosphate and higher soil available P when PSB was applied.
The interaction effect of R. japonicum and P. striata significantly influenced the nodule numbers plant−1 (Figure 6), while nodule dry weight and N content were influenced by their individual effect (Table 5). Tindwa et al. [78] also observed a positive influence of available soil P on nodulation, such as nodule numbers and dry weight, which consequently impacted N fixation. Ditta et al. [33] reported a 23% increase in the nodule formation of chickpea due to PSB. However, nodule number and dry weight increased from 30 to 50 DAS but declined at 70 DAS. The reason might be the breakdown of nodules and the use of nitrogen by plants for pod formation [10]. Moreover, on an average, an approximately 57% and 40% reduction in nodule formation was observed due to the control treatment and the application of recommended N and P fertilizers without Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata inoculation, respectively, compared to the inoculation of R. japonicum and P. striata with 50% N and 75% P. Actually, N and P are essential for microbial abundance in soil and their performance [79]. However, surprisingly, excessive nitrogen desists plants from forming nodules, and a dearth of sufficient N in soil forces plants to go for an energy expensive biological N fixation process, which results in more nodule formation and an accumulation of nitrogen in plants [80]. Henceforth, a reduced amount of nitrogen as a basal dose might be helpful for microbial growth and biological N fixation. The phenotypic characteristics of legumes, such as N fixing ability and nodule dry weight, depend upon Rhizobium and the function of the gene-regulating Nod-factor structure [69]. Rhizobium fixes atmospheric N and PSB helps in root development by providing more available P, which combinedly triggers nodule formation [81]. Furthermore, P is essential for the formation of nodule tissue and ATP, which activates the nitrogenase enzyme [12,82]. In addition, Anand et al. [83] documented the influence of PSB on the production of plant growth hormones and root growth stimulation by making previously unavailable P accessible to plants, which indirectly encourages biological N fixation. The growth of a root system due to PSB-induced cytokinin increases the infection sites and in turn nodule formation [84].

5. Conclusions

Inoculation of nitrogen fixing bacteria, Rhizobium japonicum, and phosphate solubilizing bacteria, Pseudomonas striata, improved soybean growth, yield, and quality. Maximum seed yield and protein and oil content were found by using 50% of recommended nitrogen and 75% of recommended phosphorus when R. japonicum and P. striata were inoculated with seeds before sowing. Again, these beneficial microorganisms also provided higher nitrogen and available phosphorus in soil which might supplement the fertilizer requirement of the next crop. Thus, R. japonicum and P. striata benefited the environment by reducing the need for chemical fertilizers. So, R. japonicum and P. striata biofertilizers with 50% N and 75% synthetic P fertilizer can be used to produce soybean in a profitable and environmentally friendly way. However, further detailed experimentations under different soil conditions and agro-ecological zones on the capacity of these biofertilizers to fix atmospheric nitrogen and solubilize phosphorus will provide more profound knowledge of their potential in sustainable soybean production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; investigation, A.B.; formal analysis, S.S. and Z.M.S.; data curation, Z.M.S. and S.S.; writing—original draft, S.S.; methodology, S.S.; visualization, A.B.; supervision and project administration, S.S.; writing—review and editing, Z.M.S. and S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the Research and Development (R&D) project/2020-2021 of the Ministry of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the Ministry of Science and Technology of Bangladesh for funding the project. We thank Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Bangladesh for technical support and assistance in conducting the experiment. We also acknowledge the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute for providing some research materials and valuable information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tairo, E.V.; Ndakidemi, P.A. Bradyrhizobium japonicum Inoculation and Phosphorus Supplementation on Growth and Chlorophyll Accumulation in Soybean (Glycine max L.). Am. J. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 2281–2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Nget, R.; Aguilar, E.A.; Cruz, P.C.S.; Reaño, C.E.; Sanchez, P.B.; Reyes, M.R.; Prasad, P.V.V. Responses of Soybean Genotypes to Different Nitrogen and Phosphorus Sources: Impacts on Yield Components, Seed Yield, and Seed Protein. Plants 2022, 11, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dabesa, A.; Tana, T. Response of Soybean (Glycine max L. (Merrill)) to Bradyrhizobium Inoculation, Lime, and Phosphorus Applications at Bako, Western Ethiopia. Int. J. Agron. 2021, 2021, 6686957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Razaq, M.; Zhang, P.; Shen, H.; Salahuddin. Influence of nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth and root morphology of Acer mono. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kumar, S.; Diksha; Sindhu, S.S.; Kumar, R. Biofertilizers: An eco-friendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 2022, 3, 100094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, J.; Cook, J.; Nearing, J.T.; Zhang, J.; Raudonis, R.; Glick, B.R.; Langille, M.G.I.; Cheng, Z. Harnessing the plant microbiome to promote the growth of agricultural crops. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 245, 126690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Murgese, P.; Santamaria, P.; Leoni, B.; Crecchio, C. Ameliorative effects of PGPB on yield, physiological parameters, and nutrient transporter genes expression in Barattiere (Cucumis melo L.). J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2020, 20, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fasusi, O.A.; Cruz, C.; Babalola, O.O. Agricultural sustainability: Microbial biofertilizers in rhizosphere management. Agriculture 2021, 11, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ahemad, M.; Kibret, M. Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. J. King Saud Uni. Sci. 2014, 26, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Tagore, G.S.; Namdeo, S.L.; Sharma, S.K.; Kumar, N. Effect of Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacterial inoculants on symbiotic traits, nodule leghaemoglobin, and yield of chickpea genotypes. Int. J. Agron. 2013, 2013, 581627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Adams, M.A.; Turnbull, T.L.; Sprent, J.I.; Buchmann, N. Legume are different: Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis, and water use efficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 4098–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Singh, M.; Kumar, N.; Kumar, S.; Lal, M. Effect of co-inoculation of B. Japonicum, PSB and AM fungi on microbial biomass carbon, nutrient uptake and yield of soybean (Glycine max L. merril). Agriways 2015, 3, 14–18. [Google Scholar]
  13. Khan, M.S.; Koizumi, N.; Olds, J.L. Biofixation of atmospheric nitrogen in the context of world staple crop production: Policy perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 701, 134945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Salvagiotti, F.; Cassman, K.G.; Specht, J.E.; Walters, D.T.; Weiss, A.; Dobermann, A. Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans: A review. Field Crop. Res. 2008, 108, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Santachiara, G.; Borrás, L.; Salvagiotti, F.; Gerde, J.A.; Rotundo, J.L. Relative importance of biological nitrogen fixation and mineral uptake in high yielding soybean cultivars. Plant Soil 2017, 418, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zohaib, A.; Yousaf, S.; Anjum, S.A.; Tabassum, T.; Abbas, T.; Muzaffar, W.; Ikram, W. Growth, allometry and dry matter yield of soybean genotypes in response to seed inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 2019, 32, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shah, A.; Nazari, M.; Antar, M.; Msimbira, L.A.; Naamala, J.; Lyu, D.; Rabileh, M.; Zajonc, J.; Smith, D.L. PGPR in agriculture: A sustainable approach to increasing climate change resilience. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 667546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ray, J.D.; Heatherly, L.G.; Fritschi, F.B. Influence of large amounts of nitrogen on non-irrigated and irrigated soybean. Crop Sci. 2006, 46, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Hungria, M.; Mendes, I.C. Nitrogen fixation with soybean: Perfect symbiosis? In Biological Nitrogen Fixation; De Bruijin, F.J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015; Volume 2, pp. 1009–1023. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hatfield, J.L.; Egli, D.B.; Leggett, J.E.; Peaslee, D.E. Effect of applied nitrogen on the nodulation and early growth of soybean. Agron. J. 1974, 66, 112–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hardy, R.W.F.; Burns, R.C.; Herbert, R.R.; Jackson, E.K. Biological nitrogen fixation: A key to world protein. Plant Soil 1971, 35, 561–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Aziz, A.; Ahiabor, B.; Opoku, A.; Abaidoo, R. Contributions of rhizobium inoculants and phosphorus fertilizer to biological nitrogen fixation, growth and grain yield of three soybean varieties on a fluvic luvisol. Am. J. Exp. Agric. 2016, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Malhotra, H.; Vandana; Sharma, S.; Pandey, R. Phosphorus Nutrition: Plant Growth in Response to Deficiency and Excess. In Plant Nutrients and Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Hasanuzzaman, M., Fujita, M., Oku, H., Nahar, K., Hawrylak-Nowak, B., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Si, Z.; Yang, Q.; Liang, R.; Chen, L.; Chen, D.; Li, Y. Digalactosyldiacylglycerol synthase gene MTDGD1 plays an essential role in nodule development and nitrogen fixation. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 2019, 32, 1196–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mitran, T.; Meena, R.S.; Lal, R.; Layek, J.; Kumar, S.; Datta, R. Role of soil phosphorus on legume production. In Legumes for Soil Health and Sustainable Management; Meena, R., Das, A., Yadav, G., Lal, R., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 487–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, D.; Lv, S.; Jiang, P.; Li, Y. Roles, regulation, and agricultural application of plant phosphate transporters. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Smith, V.H. Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: A global problem. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2003, 10, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Tandon, A.; Fatima, T.; Anshu, S.D.; Tripathi, P.; Srivastava, S.; Singh, P.C. Phosphate solubilization by Trichoderma koningiopsis (NBRI-PR5) under abiotic stress conditions. J. King Saud Uni. Sci. 2020, 32, 791–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Novo, L.A.B.; Castro, P.M.L.; Alvarenga, P.; da Silva, E.F. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria-assisted phytoremediation of mine soils. In Bio-Geotechnologies for Mine Site Rehabilitation; Prasad, M.N.V., de Campos, P.J.F., Maiti, S.K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 281–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ahmad, M.; Adil, Z.; Hussain, A.; Mumtaz, M.Z.; Nafees, M.; Ahmad, I.; Jamil, M. Potential of phosphate solubilizing bacillus strains for improving growth and nutrient uptake in mungbean and maize crops. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2019, 56, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gaur, R.; Noam, S.; Johri, B.; Rossi, P.; Aragno, M. Diacetylphloroglucinol-producing pseudomonads do not influence AM fungi in wheat rhizosphere. Curr. Sci. 2004, 88, 453–457. [Google Scholar]
  32. Alemneh, A.A.; Cawthray, G.R.; Zhou, Y.; Ryder, M.H.; Denton, M.D. Ability to produce indole acetic acid is associated with improved phosphate solubilizing activity of rhizobacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 3825–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ditta, A.; Imtiaz, M.; Mehmood, S.; Rizwan, M.S.; Mubeen, F.; Aziz, O.; Qian, Z.; Ijaz, R.; Tu, S. Rock phosphate-enriched organic fertilizer with phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms improves nodulation, growth, and yield of legumes. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2018, 49, 2715–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chaudhary, S.R.; Sindhu, S.S. Growth stimulation of clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) by coinoculation with rhizosphere bacteria and Rhizobium. Legume Res. 2016, 39, 1003–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Hossain, T. Oilseeds and Products Annual; United States Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 2021; pp. 2–7. [Google Scholar]
  36. Salam, M.A.; Kamruzzaman, M. Comparative and competitive advantage of soybean cultivation in Noakhali and Laxmipur districts of Bangladesh. J. Bangladesh Agril. Univ. 2015, 13, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Islam, K.S.; Ali, M.M.; Shahrin, S.; Cheesman, S.; Alam, S.N.; Krupnik, T.J. Simple and Effective Management Methods that Can Improve Soybean Production in Bangladesh; CIMMYT: El Batan, Mexico, 2022; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  38. FRG. Fertilizer Recommendation Guide; Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council (BARC): Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  39. Egashira, K.; Hagimine, M.; Moslehuddin, A.Z.M. Fixed ammonium in some Bangladesh soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1998, 44, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mehmood, K.; Baquy, M.A.A.; Xu, R.K. Influence of nitrogen fertilizer forms and crop straw biochars on soil exchange properties and maize growth on an acidic Ultisol. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2018, 64, 834–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Walkley, A.; Black, I.A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining organic carbon in soils: Effect of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents. Soil Sci. 1934, 63, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Douglas, W.P. A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor. Geoderma 2010, 156, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Olsen, S.R.; Cole, C.V.; Watanabe, F.S.; Dean, L.A. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate; USDA: Washington, DC, USA, 1954. [Google Scholar]
  44. Brown, J.G.; Lilleland, O. Rapid determination of potassium and sodium in plant materials and soil extracts by flame photometry. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 1946, 48, 341–345. [Google Scholar]
  45. Victor, J.K.; Nearpass, D.C. The Determination of Available Sulfur in Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1960, 24, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Watson, D.J. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops: I Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties and between years. Ann. Bot. 1947, 11, 41–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Arnon, D.I. Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplasts polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949, 24, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Jones, J.B.; Case, V.W. Sampling, Handling, and Analyzing Plant Tissue Samples; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 389–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed.; The Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  50. FAO. Food Energy—Methods of Analysis and Conversion Factors; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yao, Y.; You, Q.; Duan, G.; Ren, G.; Chu, S.; Zhao, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Jiao, Y. Quantitative trait loci analysis of seed oil content and composition of wild and cultivated soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jacoby, R.; Peukert, M.; Succurro, A.; Koprivova, A.; Kopriva, S. The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition—Current knowledge and future directions. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Assainar, S.K.; Abbott, L.K.; Mickan, B.S.; Storer, P.J.; Whiteley, A.S.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Solaiman, Z.M. Polymer-coated rock mineral fertilizer has potential to substitute soluble fertilizer for increasing growth, nutrient uptake, and yield of wheat. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2020, 56, 381–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Patra, P.; Pati, B.K.; Ghosh, G.K.; Mura, S.S.; Saha, A. Effect of biofertilizers and sulphur on growth, yield and oil content of hybrid sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in a typical lateritic soil. Open Access Sci. Rep. 2013, 2, 603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lamptey, S.; Ahiabor, B.D.K.; Yeboah, S.; Osei, D. Effect of Rhizobium inoculants and reproductive growth stages on shoot biomass and yield f soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril). J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 6, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Goyal, R.K.; Mattoo, A.K.; Schmidt, M.A. Rhizobial–host interactions and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legume crops toward agriculture sustainability. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 669404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ohyama, T.; Tewari, K.; Ishikawa, S.; Tanaka, K.; Kamiyama, S.; Ono, Y.; Hatano, S.; Ohtake, N.; Sueyoshi, K.; Hasegawa, H.; et al. Role of nitrogen on growth and seed yield of soybean and a new fertilization technique to promote nitrogen fixation and seed yield. In Soybean—The Basis of Yield, Biomass and Productivity; Kasai, M., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Mathenge, C.; Thuita, M.; Masso, C.; Gweyi-Onyango, J.; Vanlauwe, B. Variability of soybean response to rhizobia inoculant, vermicompost, and a legume-specific fertilizer blend in Siaya County of Kenya. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 194, 104290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Qureshi, M.A.; Iqbal, A.; Akhtar, N.; Shakir, M.A.; Khan, A. Coinoculation of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and rhizobia in the presence of L-tryptophan for the promotion of mash bean (Vigna mungo L.). Soil Environ. 2012, 31, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  60. Figueiredo, M.V.B.; Martinez, C.R.; Burity, H.A.; Chanway, C.P. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for improving nodulation and nitrogen fixation in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 1187–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yasmeen, S.; Bano, A. Combined effect of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms, Rhizobium and Enterobacter on root nodulation and physiology of soybean (Glycine max L.). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2014, 45, 2373–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mahanty, T.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Goswami, M.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Das, B.; Ghosh, A.; Tribedi, P. Biofertilizers: A potential approach for sustainable agriculture development. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2017, 24, 3315–3335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sindhu, S.S.; Sharma, R.; Sindhu, S.; Sehawat, A. Soil fertility improvement by symbiotic rhizobia for sustainable agriculture. In Soil Fertility Management for Sustainable Development; Panpatte, D.G., Jhala, V.K., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore; Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2019; pp. 101–166. [Google Scholar]
  64. Basu, A.; Prasad, P.; Das, S.N.; Kalam, S.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Reddy, M.S.; El Enshasy, H. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) as green bioinoculants: Recent developments, constraints, and prospects. Sustainability. 2021, 13, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yousefi, A.A.; Khavazi, K.; Moezi, A.A.; Rejali, F.; Nadian, H.A. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi impacts on inorganic phosphorus fractions and wheat growth. World Appl. Sci. J. 2011, 15, 1310–1318. [Google Scholar]
  66. Ahmad, E.; Zaidi, A.; Khan, M.S. Response of PSM inoculation to certain legumes and cereal crops. In Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms; Khan, M.S., Zaidi, A., Musarrat, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Germany, 2014; pp. 175–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Waghmare, Y.M.; Gokhale, D.N.; Pawar, H.D. Effect of integrated nutrient management on yield, yield attributes and quality of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merill.). J. Agric. Res. Technol. 2012, 37, 370–372. [Google Scholar]
  68. Jaga, P.K.; Sharma, S. Effect of bio-fertilizer and fertilizers on productivity of soybean. Ann. Plant Soil Res. 2015, 17, 171–174. [Google Scholar]
  69. Fatima, Z.; Zia, M.; Chaudhary, F. Interactive effect of Rhizobium strains And P on soybean yield, nitrogen fixation and soil fertility. Pak. J. Bot. 2007, 39, 255–264. [Google Scholar]
  70. Adesemoye, A.Q.; Torbert, H.A.; Kloepper, J.W. Enhanced plant nutrient use efficiency with PGPR and AMF in an integrated nutrient management system. Can. J. Microbiol. 2008, 54, 876–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Calvo, P.; Watts, D.B.; Kloepper, J.W.; Torbert, H.A. Effect of microbial based inoculants on nutrient concentrations and early root morphology of corn (Zea mays). J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2017, 180, 56–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. De Sousa, S.M.; de Oliveira, C.A.; Andrade, D.L.; de Carvalho, C.G.; Ribeiro, V.P.; Pastina, M.M.; Marriel, I.E.; de Paula, U.G.L.; Gomes, E.A. Tropical Bacillus strains inoculation enhances maize root surface area, dry weight, nutrient uptake and grain yield. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 867–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Filipini, L.D.; Pilatti, F.K.; Meyer, E.; Ventura, B.S.; Lourenzi, C.R.; Lovato, P.E. Application of Azospirillum on seeds and leaves, associated with Rhizobium inoculation, increases growth and yield of common bean. Arch. Microbiol. 2021, 203, 1033–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Estrada-Bonilla, G.A.; Durrer, A.; Cardoso, E.J.B.N. Use of compost and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria affect sugarcane mineral nutrition, phosphorus availability and the soil bacterial community. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 157, 103760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, Y.; Peng, S.; Hua, Q.; Qiu, C.; Wu, P.; Liu, X.; Lin, X. The long-term effects of using phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and photosynthetic bacteria as biofertilizers on peanut yield and soil bacteria community. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 693535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Jain, L.K.; Singh, P.; Singh, P. Growth and nutrient uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as influenced by biofertilizers and phosphorus nutrition. Crop Res. 2003, 25, 410–413. [Google Scholar]
  77. Sindhu, S.S.; Dadarwal, K.R.; Davis, T.M. Non-nodulating chickpea breeding line for the study of symbiotic nitrogen fixation potential. Indian J. Microbiol. 1992, 32, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  78. Tindwa, H.J.; Kachiguma, A.; Mrema, J.P. Incubation of soil with agricultural lime and phosphorus enhances biological nitrogen fixation and yield of soybean (Glycine max (L.) merrill) in an ultisol. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2019, 20, 938–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Assainar, S.K.; Abbott, L.K.; Mickan, B.S.; Whiteley, A.S.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Solaiman, Z.M. Response of Wheat to a Multiple Species Microbial Inoculant Compared to Fertilizer Application. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Míguez-Montero, M.A.; Valentine, A.; Pérez-Fernández, M.A. Regulatory effect of phosphorus and nitrogen on nodulation and plant performance of leguminous shrubs. AoB Plants 2019, 12, plz047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Elhaissoufi, W.; Khourchi, S.; Ibnyasser, A.; Ghoulam, C.; Rchiad, Z.; Zeroual, Y.; Lyamlouli, K.; Bargaz, A. Phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria could have a stronger influence on wheat root traits and aboveground physiology than Rhizosphere P solubilization. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Cooper, J.E.; Scherer, H.W. Chapter 16—Nitrogen fixation. In Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Marschner, P., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; pp. 389–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Anand, K.; Kumari, B.; Mallick, M.A. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: An effective and alternative approach as biofertilizers. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 8, 37–40. [Google Scholar]
  84. Elkoca, E.; Kantar, F.; Sahin, F. Influence of nitrogen fixing and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria on the nodulation, plant growth, and yield of chickpea. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 31, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on pods plant−1 of soybean (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Figure 1. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on pods plant−1 of soybean (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Agriculture 12 01136 g001
Figure 2. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on seeds pod−1 of soybean, (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Figure 2. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on seeds pod−1 of soybean, (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Agriculture 12 01136 g002
Figure 3. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on seed yield of soybean, (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Figure 3. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on seed yield of soybean, (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Agriculture 12 01136 g003
Figure 4. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on protein content of soybean. (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Figure 4. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on protein content of soybean. (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Agriculture 12 01136 g004
Figure 5. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on oil content of soybean. R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Figure 5. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on oil content of soybean. R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Agriculture 12 01136 g005
Figure 6. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on number of nodules plant−1 of soybean at different days after sowing. (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Figure 6. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on number of nodules plant−1 of soybean at different days after sowing. (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Agriculture 12 01136 g006
Figure 7. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on seed nitrogen content of soybean (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Figure 7. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on seed nitrogen content of soybean (mean ± SE, n = 3); R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Agriculture 12 01136 g007
Table 1. Chemical properties of soil (initial) used for the study.
Table 1. Chemical properties of soil (initial) used for the study.
Soil PropertiesValue
pH7.2
Soil organic carbon (%)0.48
Soil organic matter (%)0.96
Nitrogen (%)0.057
Available phosphorous (mg kg−1)2.83
Available potassium (mg kg−1)140
Available sulphur (mg kg−1)11
Table 2. Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on plant height and number of branch plant−1 of soybean.
Table 2. Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on plant height and number of branch plant−1 of soybean.
TreatmentPlant Height (cm)Branch Plant−1
Rhizobium japonicum
R048.10 c4.41 c
R153.70 ab6.86 ab
R256.05 a8.18 a
R350.20 bc6.36 b
HSD(0.05)
Level of significance
3.83
**
1.48
**
Pseudomonas striata
P047.45 c4.93 b
P152.17 b6.92 a
P256.43 a7.50 a
HSD(0.05)3.001.16
Level of significance****
CV (%)5.6617.67
** indicates significance at 1% level of probability; mean values with different letters are statistically significant. R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Two-way ANOVA showed significant effects of R. japonicum and P. striata (p ≤ 0.05) but no interaction.
Table 3. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on leaf area index (LAI) and chlorophyll content of soybean.
Table 3. Interaction effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on leaf area index (LAI) and chlorophyll content of soybean.
TreatmentLeaf Area Index (LAI)Total Chlorophyll Content (mg g−1 FW)
30 DAS60 DAS
R0P00.37 c2.00 d4.42 e
R0P10.38 c1.99 d5.16 de
R0P20.39 bc2.17 cd5.47 de
R1P00.38 c2.34 bc5.89 cd
R1P10.42 abc2.60 ab6.91 bc
R1P20.55 a2.69 a8.06 ab
R2P00.38 c2.23 cd5.94 cd
R2P10.52 ab2.73 a7.59 ab
R2P20.55 a2.73 a8.39 a
R3P00.40 bc2.20 cd6.24 cd
R3P10.45 abc2.59 ab6.83 bc
R3P20.49 abc2.60 ab7.11 abc
HSD(0.05)0.140.311.32
Level of significance***
CV (%)6.8810.074.44
* indicates significance at 5% level of probability; mean values sharing similar letters are statistically insignificant. R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Two-way ANOVA showed a significant interaction (p ≤ 0.05) between R. japonicum and P. striata.
Table 4. Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on pod length and 100-seed weight of soybean.
Table 4. Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on pod length and 100-seed weight of soybean.
TreatmentPod Length (cm)100-Seed Weight (g)
Rhizobium japonicum
R03.66 c9.71 c
R14.55 b11.13 b
R25.11 a11.89 a
R34.36 b10.84 b
HSD(0.05)****
Level of significance0.280.58
Pseudomonas striata
P04.03 b10.07 c
P14.51 a11.07 b
P24.72 a11.54 a
HSD(0.05)0.220.46
Level of significance****
CV (%)4.834.10
** indicates significance at 1% level of probability; mean values with different letters are statistically significant. R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Two-way ANOVA showed significant effects of R. japonicum and P. striata (p ≤ 0.05) but no interaction.
Table 5. Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on dry weight and nitrogen content of nodules at different days after sowing.
Table 5. Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on dry weight and nitrogen content of nodules at different days after sowing.
TreatmentNodule Dry Weight (mg Plant−1)Nitrogen Percentage of Nodule (60 DAS)
30 DAS50 DAS70 DAS
Rhizobium japonicum
R029.82 c36.05 d31.97 d3.54 c
R136.01 b43.03 c39.59 c4.46 b
R241.79 a66.57 a61.48 a4.93 a
R337.08 b48.56 b44.62 b4.72 a
HSD(0.05)2.963.473.130.21
Level of significance********
Pseudomonas striata
P034.44 b46.83 b42.93 b4.24 b
P136.39 ab48.45 ab44.28 ab4.49 a
P237.69 a50.40 a46.05 a4.51 a
HSD(0.05)2.322.722.450.16
Level of significance******
CV (%)6.295.505.413.62
** indicates significance at 1% level of probability and * indicates significance at 5% level of probability; mean values with different letters are statistically significant. R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Two-way ANOVA showed significant effects of R. japonicum and P. striata (p ≤ 0.05) but no interaction.
Table 6. Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on nitrogen and phosphorus content of soybean shoot and seed at harvest.
Table 6. Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on nitrogen and phosphorus content of soybean shoot and seed at harvest.
TreatmentShoot N (%)Shoot P (%)Seed P (%)
Rhizobium japonicum
R01.48 c0.370.48 c
R12.81 b0.390.60 b
R23.08 a0.390.66 a
R32.93 ab0.390.65 a
HSD(0.05)0.19-0.05
Level of significance**NS**
Pseudomonas striata
P02.530.28 c0.38 c
P12.550.41 b0.67 b
P22.650.47 a0.74 a
HSD(0.05)-0.030.04
Level of significanceNS****
CV(%)5.717.005.81
** indicates significance at 1% level of probability and NS means non-significant; mean values with different letters are statistically significant. R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Two-way ANOVA showed significant effects of R. japonicum and P. striata (p ≤ 0.05) but no interaction.
Table 7. Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on post-harvest soil nitrogen and available phosphorus.
Table 7. Effect of Rhizobium japonicum and Pseudomonas striata on post-harvest soil nitrogen and available phosphorus.
TreatmentSoil N (%)Soil Available Phosphorus
(mg kg−1)
Rhizobium japonicum
R00.11 d3.81
R10.16 c3.90
R20.27 a4.17
R30.22 b3.88
HSD(0.05)0.02-
Level of significance**NS
Pseudomonas striata
P00.182.88 b
P10.192.99 b
P20.205.94 a
HSD(0.05)-0.31
Level of significanceNS**
CV (%)8.067.69
** indicates significant at 1% level of probability and NS means non-significant; mean values sharing different letters are statistically significant. R0: Control (no nitrogen and R. japonicum), R1: 100% N without R. japonicum, R2: 50% N with R. japonicum, R3: only R. japonicum inoculant, P0: Control (no P and no P. striata), P1: 100% P without P. striata and P2: 75% P with P. striata. Two-way ANOVA showed significant effects of R. japonicum and P. striata (p ≤ 0.05) but no interaction.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shome, S.; Barman, A.; Solaiman, Z.M. Rhizobium and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Influence the Soil Nutrient Availability, Growth, Yield, and Quality of Soybean. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081136

AMA Style

Shome S, Barman A, Solaiman ZM. Rhizobium and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Influence the Soil Nutrient Availability, Growth, Yield, and Quality of Soybean. Agriculture. 2022; 12(8):1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shome, Swarna, Alak Barman, and Zakaria M. Solaiman. 2022. "Rhizobium and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria Influence the Soil Nutrient Availability, Growth, Yield, and Quality of Soybean" Agriculture 12, no. 8: 1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12081136

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop