Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Reproduction Performance Traits in Sows of the CG36 Hybrid Line, Including the Effect of Selected Factors and Phenotypic Correlations
Next Article in Special Issue
A Prophylactic Application of Systemic Insecticides Contributes to the Management of the Hibiscus Bud Weevil Anthonomus testaceosquamosus Linell (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Previous Article in Journal
“Eyes”, “Brain”, “Feet” and “Hands” of Efficient Harvesting Machinery
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prediction of the Potential Distribution of Drosophila suzukii on Madeira Island Using the Maximum Entropy Modeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Preference of Thrips tabaci for Allium cepa, Allium fistulosum, and Allium roylei

by
Marta Olczyk
1,
Elisabeth H. Koschier
2,
Tomasz Wójtowicz
3 and
Maria Pobożniak
1,*
1
Department of Botany, Physiology and Plant Protection, Faculty of Biotechnology and Horticulture, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-425 Krakow, Poland
2
Institute of Plant Protection, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Gregor Mendel-Strasse 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria
3
Department of Plant Breeding, Physiology and Seed Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Economics, University of Agriculture in Krakow, 31-120 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(10), 1862; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101862
Submission received: 28 August 2023 / Revised: 14 September 2023 / Accepted: 21 September 2023 / Published: 23 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Integrated Pest Management Strategies)

Abstract

:
Thrips tabaci Lind. (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) is a key pest of onions worldwide. It causes both direct and indirect damage to onion crops, resulting in high yield losses. Today, the Integrated System of Production and Plant Protection requires onion growers to use onion- thrips-resistant cultivars. It has become apparent that the improvement of existing onion cultivars may not be a sufficient, so it is necessary to search for desirable plant traits related to disease and pest resistance among existing and wild cultivars. For this purpose, we conducted bioassays on the possible preference of T. tabaci for three different cultivars of Allium cepa L., namely, Alibaba, Bila, Tęcza, one cultivar Kroll of Welsh onion, Allium fistulosum L., and the wild species Allium roylei Stearn. The settling preference and the oviposition rate of female onion thrips were evaluated using choice and no-choice laboratory tests, respectively. During the bioassay, on leaf sections of the A. roylei species, a significantly higher number of T. tabaci females was recorded compared to the cv. Tęcza of the A. cepa species and the cv. Kroll of the A. fistulosum species in each observation period. Significantly more thrips settled on cv. Kroll compared to Alibaba and Bila. Regarding the results obtained on A. cepa, significantly fewer females were found on cv. Bila compared to cv. Tęcza. Opposite results were observed in a combination of cvs. Tęcza–Alibaba, where significantly more insects settled on the leaves of cv. Alibaba. Statistically significant differences between cultivars/species were found in the number of hatched larvae on the leaves of the tested cultivars/species of onion. The lowest number of larvae hatched from eggs laid on A. roylei, as compared to A. fistulosum and the cultivars of A. cepa, except for Bila.

1. Introduction

Onion (common onion or bulb onion) (Allium cepa L.) is a universal vegetable popular in many cuisines around the world, with a global total production of 93,226,400 tonnes, and it accounts for approximately 24% of the world’s total vegetable production [1]. Onion production and breeding involve many challenges. Like other crops, onions are susceptible to insect, fungal, bacterial, viral, and nematode pests [2,3]. One of the main insect pests is the onion thrips (Thrips tabaci Lind.; Thysanoptera: Thripidae). It is a phytophagous and polyphagous, invasive, cosmopolitan, and highly fecundating insect pest with a rapid development rate and a vector of several onion pathogens and tospoviruses [4,5,6,7,8]. An attack by T. tabaci not only leads to a complete loss of onion seedlings but may also cause damage to older crops due to the pest’s feeding on leaves as well as onion bulbs [9]. The low effectiveness of insecticides in controlling thrips—and thrips’ increased resistance to them—leads to high losses in the cultivation of onions [10,11]. A reduction in yields of approximately 40–65% has been reported due to attacks by these pests [12,13]. The full resistance (or tolerance) of onion to T. tabaci would be highly beneficial; however, in the available literature, we have not found information about the existence of such cultivars and breeding lines of onion. However, in recent years, some plant characteristics that are responsible for the partial resistance of onions to T. tabaci have been identified. The differences in resistant and susceptible cultivars have been associated with leaf color [14], the amounts and types of epicuticular leaf wax [15,16], plant architecture and anatomy [17,18], and total phenol content [19,20]. Recently, it was also possible to select some onion genotypes that showed a lower number of thrips compared to susceptible ones [19,21], and these produced large bulb yields under thrips pressure [17,22].
Onion breeding programs currently focus mainly on the improvement of existing cultivars; however, many desirable traits, such as resistance to diseases and pests, are possessed by wild Allium species [23].
Allium roylei Stearn and Allium fistulosum L. have been recognized as the most important gene pools of onion [24,25]. A. roylei is a wild species originating from the Indian subcontinent which possesses genes imparting resistance to various harmful fungal diseases and pests [26,27,28,29]. A. fistulosum (Welsh onion, Japanese bunching onion, spring onion) is widely cultivated in Japan, China, and Korea. Its origin is unknown; it is believed to be of Chinese origin [30]. This Allium sp. also possesses many characteristics that are agronomically useful for onions due to its resistance to onion leaf blight, pink root, anthracnose, and onion fly [23,31,32].
Our previous field studies, in which A. roylei and A. fistulosum were less colonized and damaged by T. tabaci compared to A. cepa cultivars and breeding lines [33], encouraged us to continue research on them. Therefore, this research was conducted under laboratory conditions to prove T. tabaci settlement and oviposition activity on leaves of A. roylei and A. fistulosum compared to three cultivars of A. cepa that differed in their susceptibility to the colonization and feeding of thrips under field conditions [20].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Plants

Three onion species were used in the laboratory experiments: Allium cepa L. (cvs. Alibaba, Bila, and Tęcza.), Allium fistulosum (cv. Kroll), and Allium roylei (ecotypes 333). All the A. cepa and A. fistulosum cultivars used in the trials are registered for cultivation in central Europe and are commercially available. The seeds were obtained from Polish breeding companies, namely, PlantiCo Zielonki in Stare Babice (cvs. Alibaba, Bila, and Kroll) and Spójnia in Nochowo (cv. Tęcza). A. roylei seeds we obtained from the bank of Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory, Research Institute of Vegetable Crops, in Skierniewice in Poland. The onion plants used in the experiments were grown in a standard substrate in trays within a plant growing room at 24 ± 1 °C in 35 ± 5% relative humidity, with a photoperiod of 16:8 h of light/dark. All plants were watered regularly with tap water alone. Leaves from onion plants that were approximately four weeks old were used in all the bioassays.

2.2. Test Insects

Using a rearing method adapted from Loomans and Murai [34], a stock culture of a thelytokous T. tabaci strain was maintained on white cabbage leaves in 0·75 L glass jars covered with a fine mesh to ensure ventilation. The rearing was conducted in a climate chamber at 24 ± 1 °C in 35 ± 5% relative humidity, with a photoperiod of 16:8 h of light/dark. White cabbage was purchased regularly, and fresh pieces of leaf were added two to three times a week.
To obtain groups of females of known age, thrips pupae were randomly collected from the rearing jars and transferred to Petri dishes (diameter 90 mm) with sections of leek (Allium ampeloprasum L.) leaves. The dishes were closed with lids with central holes covered with a fine mesh to allow for air circulation and were sealed with a sealing film to prevent the thrips from escaping. After 48 h, the adult females were checked, and any remaining pupae were removed. Following an additional pre-oviposition period of 48 h, single females were used in the bioassays.

2.3. Oviposition Rate

The oviposition rate of female onion thrips on Allium species/cultivars was evaluated using a no-choice test. For this bioassay, four-centimeter sections of onion leaves were cut from the middle part of the leaves of the respective test plant. To protect the leaf sections from desiccation and to prevent the thrips from getting inside the leaves, both ends of the leaf sections were briefly dipped in warm liquid paraffin wax. After the wax had solidified, the leaf sections were placed singly on a thin film of 1% water agar (Agar—Agar, Kobe I, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) in glass Petri dishes (60 mm diameter). Subsequently, single females of known age were transferred to each glass Petri dish and placed on the leaf section. To prevent the escape of the T. tabaci females, the dishes were covered with a thin (14 µm), clear plastic film (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), which was perforated (one hole per cm2 on average) using insect pins (0·4 mm diameter). The bioassay units were kept in a climate chamber at 24 ± 1 °C in 35 ± 5% relative humidity, with a photoperiod of 16:8 h of light/dark. After 24 h, the females were removed. The plant sections with eggs were kept in the climatic chamber for another five days. After that, the hatched larvae were counted under a stereoscopic microscope.

2.4. Settling Preference

The settling preference of T. tabaci females for leaf sections of the different Allium species/cultivars was determined by means of a choice test. Eight pairs of species/cultivars were compared against each other: Tęcza × Alibaba; Tęcza × Bila; Tęcza × Kroll; Tęcza × A. roylei, Alibaba × Bila; Alibaba × Kroll; Bila × Kroll; and Kroll × A. roylei. Each pair consisted of two four-centimeter sections of onion leaves, sealed with wax at both ends (as described above). These sections were placed parallel and equidistant to each other in the center of the bottom of a 90 mm diameter glass Petri dish. Subsequently, ten females of unknown age were placed at the starting point in the center, between the parallel-lying onion leaf sections of the tested pair of cultivars. Each bioassay unit was covered with a perforated plastic film and completely randomized under an artificial light source in a climate chamber at 24 ± 1 °C and in 35 ± 5% relative humidity. Then, 10, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min after the female thrips had dispersed from the starting point, the number of thrips were counted on each of the two sections of onion leaves of the tested cultivars, as well as in the surrounding space. The experiment was replicated 10 to 12 times, resulting in preferences recorded for 100 to 120 female thrips for each pair of onion cultivars/species.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Analyses of the bioassay data were performed using Statistica 13 software (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2017). The results of the settling preference tests were analyzed with Student’s t-test for an unequal sample size (12 replications, with only 10 replications for Tęcza × Kroll) with a significance level of p < 0.05. The normality of the distribution of the tested samples was checked with the Shapiro–Wilk test, and log(x + 1) transformation was performed in the case of a lack of normality. The data obtained from the oviposition tests with the hatched thrips larvae were subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the factor of the onion cultivar/species and an unequal number of replications (cv. Tęcza = 26, cv. Alibaba = 28, cv. Bila = 27, cv. Kroll 43, sp. A. roylei = 37). Residual plots were checked prior to data analysis. In cases where the data did not show a normal distribution, they were normalized through log(x + 1) transformation. The Tukey test for an unequal sample size was used to compare the means at a significance level of p < 0.05.

3. Results

In the no-choice experiments on the oviposition rate of female onion thrips, significant variability was observed among the cultivars/species regarding the mean number of thrips larvae that had hatched from eggs laid inside the tissue of the onion leaves (F = 27.158; df = 4; p < 0.000). T. tabaci females laid significantly more eggs on the leaves of A. cepa cultivars compared to A roylei (almost three times more) (Figure 1). Additionally, a significantly higher number of T. tabaci larvae hatched from eggs laid on cv. Tęcza and Bila compared to A. fistulosum (cv. Kroll). Moreover, a significantly higher number of T. tabaci larvae hatched from eggs on cv. Kroll than on A. roylei (Figure 1).
In a preference test for onion thrips settling on different species and cultivars of Allium sp., a significantly higher number of female onion thrips settled on the leaf sections of A. roylei compared to cv. Tęcza (A. cepa) and cv. Kroll (A. fistulosum) during each observation period (Figure 2c,d). In both comparisons, almost twice as many T. tabaci females were observed on the leaf sections of A. roylei. When the A. cepa cultivars were paired with cv. Kroll (A. fistulosum), the female T. tabaci demonstrated a significant preference for A. fistulosum over cv. Alibaba and cv. Bila throughout the test period, except for the first 10 min (Figure 2f,h). When the common onion cultivars Alibaba and Bila were paired with cv. Tęcza, the settling preference of T. tabaci females was different. A significantly higher number of thrips settled on cv. Alibaba compared to cv. Tęcza, whereas cv. Tęcza was preferred over Bila (Figure 2e,g). For the pairs Alibaba × Bila (Figure 2b) and Tęcza × Kroll (Figure 2a), there were no significant differences in the onion thrips’ preference.

4. Discussion

Our experiments were short-term laboratory experiments that only provided information on the thrips’ selection behavior in the first stage of colonization and acceptance of the plant for egg laying. The observed differences in the numbers of hatched larvae indeed reflect differences in oviposition (the number of eggs from which the larvae hatched). Among the three onion species tested (A. cepa, A. fistulosum, and A. roylei), the most frequently colonized by T. tabaci females was A. roylei. While the adult T. tabaci did not respond to the A. cepa plant’s odor in a Y-tube olfactometer [14], plant volatiles from the A. roylei leaf sections may have attracted T. tabaci during the 180 min period in this study. Olfactometer tests using T. tabaci and A. roylei plants could help to clarify this possible attraction. On the contrary, in the oviposition bioassay without choice over a 24 h period, four times fewer larvae hatched on the leaves of A. roylei than on the common onion cv. Tęcza, this being almost two times fewer than on the Welsh onion. It has been hypothesized by some authors that thrips and other herbivore females would prefer those leaves for oviposition that create the best conditions for the development of offspring and thus achieving the greatest reproductive success [35,36,37]. The lower fecundity of females on the leaves of A. roylei could therefore result from less favorable conditions for the feeding and development of offspring. In our earlier field studies, we noticed that despite the presence of T. tabaci on the leaves of A. roylei, no damage caused by the thrips feeding on them was observed, in contrast to the injured leaves of A. cepa and A. fistulosum [33]. The lower oviposition rate of females on the A. roylei leaves under laboratory conditions and the lack of damage to the leaves under field conditions, when T. tabaci had a choice between many cultivars and the breeding lines of A. cepa and A. fistulosum, may suggest that this wild onion species has some traits of resistance to T. tabaci which discourage thrips from feeding and egg laying. A. roylei is a plant with narrow, drooping leaves which are sometimes described as filiform. Mature, full-sized leaves are fistulous, though smaller ones are sometimes solid. In turn, A. fistulosum (cv. Kroll) leaves are wide, erect, and pointed hollow tubes and are more similar to the cylindrical, fleshy, and hollow leaves of A. cepa [38] (authors’ observations). Differences in resistance to thrips between the tested onion species may be due to certain morphological features of their leaves, which make it difficult for females to lay eggs. They may concern the thickness and rigidity of the cellular wall, the amount of epicuticular waxes, the structure of the epidermis, and the number of stomates [18,39,40]. Onion genotypes (A. cepa) with less epidermal wax on their leaves are less frequently attacked and less susceptible to T. tabaci feeding. The large amounts of cuticle wax on most onion cultivars available in cultivation allow thrips to adhere to the leaf surface and cause damage [15]. Onion genotypes resistant or moderately resistant to T. tabaci have densely arranged wax crystals in the form of filaments, rods, and tubes [15,16]. Onions with more epidermal wax on their leaves tend to have darker leaves than those with less wax, which are usually lighter in color [15,41,42]. In research conducted by Diaz-Montano et al. [14], two cvs. Yankee and Nebula had blue-green foliage and were colonized by higher thrips populations, whereas 15 cultivars with yellow-green-colored leaves had a significantly lower number of thrips. Other authors indicated that the resistance of onion genotypes to thrips is also influenced by the structure of the plant, because this pest feeds mainly in the axils of the basal parts of the leaves. The narrower axils of onion leaves prevent thrips from accessing them, making them more resistant [17,18].
Post-alighting host acceptance and subsequent feeding and reproduction are strongly influenced by the plant’s nutritional quality and defenses such as secondary metabolites [43,44]. A negative relationship between the total phenol content and thrips damage was observed by researchers studying the biochemical basis of onions’ resistance to T. tabaci [19,20]. Njau et al. [19] and Bhonde et al. [45] found that the total sugar content in the leaves of onion genotypes was positively correlated with the number of onion thrips, while Pobożniak et al. [20] confirmed the positive correlation between reducing sugar quantity and thrips density.
Many bioactive metabolites like cysteine, sulfoxides, flavanols, polyphenols, and saponins are synthesized by different organs of A. roylei to provide defense against a wide range of plant pathogens and herbivores [46,47]. Resistance against downy mildew (Perenospora destructor (Berk.) Casp. ex Berk.) was identified in A. roylei and successfully transferred to bulb onion [28]. This wild onion is partially resistant to leaf blight disease caused by Botrytis squamosa J. C. Walker and basal rot disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepa [29,48]. Also, A. roylei has been proven to be partially resistant to beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua Hübner. The larval growth and survival of S. exigua proved to be significantly slower on A. roylei compared to A. cepa, A. fistulosum, and A. galanthum Kar. et Kir. [49]. The prospect of using A. roylei as a source of resistance to T. tabaci in onion breeding is promising, but further research is needed to determine how many larvae can complete their development, how quickly they will develop, and what the final condition and fertility of the next generation of females will be.
In our bioassay, A. fistulosum cv. Kroll was more frequently chosen for settling by female T. tabaci than the two cultivars of A. cepa, i.e., Alibaba and Bila, but a significantly lower number of larvae hatched from eggs laid by females on leaves of A. fistulosum compared with leaves of two cultivars of A. cepa, i.e., Bila and Tęcza. In our field study, despite the very high number of thrips caught from the leaves of A. fistulosum, minor damage was recorded on them [33]. The leaves of A. fistulosum were damaged by feeding thrips only in 6.5% of cases in 2015 and 1.5% of cases in 2016 (unpubl. data), while the corresponding figures for the leaves of A. cepa cvs. Alibaba, Bila, and Tęcza were, respectively, 13.5%, 13.9%, and 17.8% in 2015 and 5.3%, 6.8%, and 7.3% in 2016 [20]. This was also confirmed in a field study conducted by Hudák and Pénzes [50], where A. fistulosum showed less damage than A. cepa under similar field conditions. This confirms that T. tabaci has a higher affinity toward the A. fistulosum phenotype during settlement and supports higher densities of thrips, but A. cepa creates better conditions for foraging and laying eggs. Ren et al. [51] proved that volatiles are important factors for thrips in regard to host preference. In their study, one of the most attractive volatiles, along with Medicago sativa, for T. tabaci and Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande appeared to be the volatiles of A. fistulosum in its vegetative and flowering stages. In turn, Jones et al. [52] showed that the Nebuka type of A. fistulosum has a similar low degree of thrips colonization, as the resistant cv. White Persian of A. cepa. The authors noted that the leaves of both Allium sp. were circular, and they had a spreading growth habit and a long sheath region. Some authors report that A. fistulosum can be used for the improvement of the common onion, especially for its resistance to the pink root (Phomaterrestris E. M. Hans.) [53], Fusarium basal rot, T. tabaci, smut (Urocystisce pulae Frost) [54], and onion fly (Hylemya antiqua Bouche) [54]. Varietal resistance against Liriomyza chinensis (Kato) has been reported in A. fistulosum in Japan. Antibiosis studies have shown significant differences in survival up to the pupal stage, in the forewing lengths of adults, and in the development time from the egg to pupal stages among the resistant and susceptible varieties of A. fistulosum [55,56]. A. fistulosum and wild Allium species like A. hookeri, A. altaicum, and A. angulosum are a rich source of lectins, and these compounds have recently been proven to have insecticidal activity against T. tabaci [57]. The authors suggest that the high lectin content of A. hookeri and A. fistulosum can be correlated with the low amount of thrips damage. Whole-plant and detached leaf damage tests revealed that A. hookeri was resistant to T. tabaci. However, an inferior development of this pest was observed not only on A. hookeri but also on A. fistulosum. There are many local and commercial cultivars of A. fistulosum with distinctive differences in morphological and other traits that are adapted to a variety of climatic conditions. The wide variety of A. fistulosum phenotypes that exist around the world [58] suggests that some of them will likely develop traits that will promote resistance or tolerance to T. tabaci; thus, further research in this direction appears to be justified.
In a previous field study, cv. Tęcza was resistant to thrips abundance but susceptible to thrips feeding and was more heavily damaged than varieties susceptible to thrips infestation and foraging cv. Alibaba [20]. Although the laboratory test did not show significant differences in the number of hatched T. tabaci larvae between the tested cultivars of A. cepa, the highest number of larvae was recorded on cv. Tęcza. Perhaps the cv. Tęcza, which stimulated T. tabaci individuals to feed more under field conditions, could also stimulate females to lay eggs more intensively during the bioassay test. In the settlement test in the Alibaba × Tęcza pairing, the greatest preference exhibited by female onion thrips was that for cv. Alibaba, but in the pairing Bila × Tęcza, cv. Tęcza was preferred to cv. Bila. In a field study, Alibaba was also more populated by T. tabaci than cv. Tęcza, but cv. Tęcza appeared to be less attractive than cv. Bila [20]. Laboratory tests do not always reflect the behavior of insects in the field, where they are influenced by many abiotic and biotic factors, and the results obtained must be interpreted with this in mind.

5. Conclusions

The choice between A. cepa, A. roylei, and A. fistulosum exhibited by the females of T. tabaci was the opposite in the tests on the preference for settlement and on the rate of oviposition. This may indicate that other plants’ characteristics attract females to colonize them, and others stimulate them to lay eggs. Since the lowest number of larvae hatched on A. roylei, followed by A. fistulosum, it can be assumed that the leaves of these species have certain traits that discourage or inhibit females from laying eggs or hatching larvae. For this reason, these species should be studied in the future for the biology of T. tabaci and for the features, including the morphological, anatomical, and biochemical, that may impede the development of thrips.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O. and M.P.; methodology, E.H.K. and M.O.; software, M.P. and T.W.; validation, M.P. and M.O.; formal analysis, M.P.; investigation, M.O. and E.H.K.; resources, M.P and T.W.; data curation, M.O. and M.P.; writing—M.P. and M.O.; writing—review and editing, M.P., M.O. and E.H.K.; visualization, T.W. and M.P.; supervision, M.P. and M.O.; project administration, M.P.; funding acquisition M.P. and E.H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland as a part of a research subsidy awarded to the University of Agriculture in Krakow (DS-3508/WBiO).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal work was conducted according to the relevant national and international guidelines. For insect collection, no permits were required since the area where the thrips were collected did not contain any strictly protected areas, and Thrips tabaci is not under protection in Europe. Also, no permits were required to use insects for the experiments due to the observational nature of the data collection.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in the Harvard Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5KCCM7 (accessed on 16 July 2023).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Joseph William Woodborn for proofreading this manuscript. Thanks to Ghita Della Pasqua for her help with the analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Commodity Production Data; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mishra, R.K.; Jaiswal, R.K.; Kumar, D.; Saabal, P.R.; Singh, A. Management of major diseases and insect pests of onion and garlic; A comprehensive review. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 2014, 6, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schwartz, H.F.; Mohan, S.K. Compendium of Onion and Garlic Diseases; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1985. [Google Scholar]
  4. Diaz-Montano, J.; Fuchs, M.; Nault, B.A.; Fail, J.; Shelton, A.M. Onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): A global pest of increasing concern in onion. J. Econ. Entomol. 2011, 104, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gent, D.H.; du Toit, L.J.; Fichtner, S.F.; Mohan, S.K.; Pappu, H.R.; Schwartz, H.F. Iris yellow spot virus: An emerging threat to onion bulb and seed production. Plant Dis. 2006, 90, 1468–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grode, A.; Chen, S.; Walker, E.D.; Szendrei, Z. Onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) feeding promotes infection by Pantoeaananatis in onion. J. Econ. Entomol. 2017, 110, 2301–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gill, H.K.; Garg, H.; Gill, A.K.; Gillett-Kaufman, J.L.; Nault, B.A. Onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) biology, ecology, and management in onion production systems. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 2015, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lewis, T. Pestthrips in perspective. In Thrips as Crop Pests; Lewis, T., Ed.; CAB International: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 1–13. ISBN 9780851991788. [Google Scholar]
  9. Martin, N.A.; Workman, P.J. A new bioassay for determining the susceptibility of onion (Allium cepa) bulbs to onion thrips, Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2006, 34, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Adesanya, A.W.; Waters, T.D.; Lavine, M.D.; Walsh, D.B.; Lavine, L.C.; Zhu, F. Multiple insecticide resistance in onion thrips populations from Western USA. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 165, 104553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shelton, A.M.; Zhao, J.Z.; Nault, B.A.; Plate, J.; Musser, F.R.; Larentzaki, E. Patterns of Insecticide Resistance in Onion Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Onion Fields in New York. J. Econ. Entomol. 2006, 99, 1798–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Karar, H.; Abbas, G.; Hameed, A.; Ahmad, G.; Ali, A. Losses in Onion (Allium cepa) Due to Onion Thrips (Thrips tabaci) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Effect of Weather Factors on Population Dynamics of Thips. World Appl. Sci. J. 2014, 32, 2250–2258. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kenedall, D.M.; Capinera, J.L. Susceptibility of onion growth stages to onion thrips (Thysonoptera: Thiripidae) damage and mechanical defoliation. Envir. Entomol. 1987, 16, 859–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Diaz-Montano, J.; Fail, J.; Deutschlander, M.; Nault, B.A.; Shelton, A.M. Characterization of Resistance, Evaluation of the Attractiveness of Plant Odors, and Effect of Leaf Color on Different Onion Cultivars to Onion Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2012, 105, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Damon, S.J.; Groves, R.L.; Havey, M.J. Variation for epicuticular waxes on onion foliage and impacts on numbers of onion thrips. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2014, 139, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Munaiz, E.D.; Groves, R.L.; Havey, M.J. Amounts and types of epicuticular leaf waxes among onion accessions selected for reduced damage by onion thrips. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2020, 145, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. De Oliveira, F.G.; Santos, C.A.F.; Oliveira, V.R.; de Alencar, J.A.; da Silva, D.O.M. Evaluation of onion accessions for resistance to thrips in Brazilian semi-arid regions. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 92, 550–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. da Silva, V.C.P.; Bettoni, M.M.; Bona, C.; Foerster, L.A. Morphological and chemical characteristics of onion plants (Allium cepa L.) associated with resistance to onion thrips. Acta Sci. Agron. 2015, 37, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Njau, G.M.; Nyomora, A.M.; Dinssa, F.F.; Chang, J.C.; Malini, P.; Subramanian, S.; Srinivasan, R. Evaluation of onion (Allium cepa) germplasm entries for resistance to onion thrips, Thrips tabaci (Lindeman) in Tanzania. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2017, 37, 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pobożniak, M.; Olczyk, M.; Wójtowicz, T.; Kamińska, I.; Hanus-Fajerska, E.; Kostecka-Gugała, A.; Kruczek, M. Anatomical and Biochemical Traits Associated with Field Resistance of Onion Cultivars to Onion Thrips and the Effect of Mechanical Injury on the Level of Biochemical Compounds in Onion Leaves. Agronomy 2022, 12, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kamal, N.; Shahabeddin Nourbakhsh, S.; Cramer, C.S. Reduced Iris Yellow Spot Symptoms through Selectiothin Onion Breeding Lines. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Raut, A.M.; Pal, S.; Wahengbam, J.; Banu, N.A. Population dynamics of onion thrips (Thrips tabaci Lind., Thysanoptera; Thripidae) and varietal response of onion cultivars against onion thrips. J. Entomol. Res. 2020, 44, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kik, C. Exploitation of wild relatives for the breeding of cultivated Allium species. In Allium Crop Science: Recent Advances; Rabinowitch, H.D., Currah, L., Eds.; CABI Publishing Oxon: Oxford, UK, 2002; pp. 81–100. ISBN 9780851995106. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chuda, A.; Adamus, A. Hybridization and molecular characterization of F1 Allium cepa × Allium roylei plants. Acta Biol. Crac. Ser. Bot. 2012, 54, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shigyo, M.; Kik, C. Onion. In Vegetables II: Fabaceae, Liliaceae, Solanaceae, and Umbeliferae; Prohens, J., Nuez, F., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 121–159. ISBN 9780387741086. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kohli, B.; Gohil, R.N. Need to conserve Allium roylei Stearn: A potential gene reservoir. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2009, 56, 891–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kofoet, A.; Kik, C.; Wietsma, W.A.; de Vries, J.N. Inheritance of resistance to downy mildew (Peronospora destructor [Berk.] Casp.) from Allium roylei Stearn in the backcross Allium cepa L. × (A. roylei × A. cepa). Plant Breed. 1990, 105, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Scholten, O.E.; van Heusden, A.W.; Khrustaleva, L.I.; Burgermeijer, K.; Mank, R.A.; Antonise, R.G.C.; Harrewijn, J.L.; van Haecke, W.; Oost, E.H.; Peters, R.J.; et al. The long and winding road leading to the successful introgression of downy mildew resistance into onion. Euphytica 2007, 156, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De Vries, J.N.; Wietsma, W.A.; De Vries, T. Introgression of leaf blight resistance from Allium roylei Stearn into onion (A. cepa L.). Euphytica 1992, 62, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rian, V.; Ford-Lloyd, S.; Armstrong, J. 5—Welsh onion: Allium fistulosum L. In Genetic Improvement of Vegetable Crops; Kalloo, G., Bergh, B.O., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1993; pp. 51–58. [Google Scholar]
  31. Peffley, E.B.; Hou, A. Bulb-type onion introgressants possessing Allium fistulosum L. genes recovered frominterscfic hybrid backcrosses between A. cepa L. and A. fistulosum L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000, 100, 528–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yamashita, K.; Takator, I.Y.; Tashiro, Y. Chromosomal location of a pollen fertility-restoring gene, Rf, for CMS in Japanese bunching onion (Allium fistulosum L.) possessing the cytoplasm of A. galanthum Kar. et Kir. revealed by genomic in situ hybridization. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 111, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pobożniak, M.; Leśniak, M.; Chuda, A.; Adamus, A. Field assessment of the susceptibility of onion cultivars to thrips attack-preliminary results. Polish J. Entomol. 2016, 85, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Loomans, A.J.M.; Murai, T. Culturing thrips and parasitoids. In Thrips as Crop Pests; Lewis, T., Ed.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1997; pp. 477–503. [Google Scholar]
  35. Diaz-Montano, J.; Fuchs, M.; Nault, B.A.; Fail, J.; Shelton, A.M. Evaluation of onion cultivars for resistance to onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and Iris yellow spot virus. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mayhew, P.J. Adaptive patterns of host-plants selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 1997, 79, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Thompson, J.N. Evolutionary ecology of the relationship between oviposition preference and performance of offspring in phytophagous insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1988, 47, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. McCollum, G.D. Experimental hybrids between Allium fistulosum and A. roylei. Bot. Gaz. 1982, 143, 238–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hanafy, A.R.I.; Tahany, R.A.; Nowar, E.E.; Hasan, S.M. Effect of anatomical and phytochemical diversity of two onion cultivars on the infestation with onion thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Middle East J. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 941–948. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tibebu, B. Defense Mechanisms of Plants to Insect Pests: From Morphological to Biochemical Approach. Trends Tech. Sci. Res. 2018, 2, 555584. [Google Scholar]
  41. Jones, H.A.; Bailey, S.F.; Emsweller, S.L. Field studies of Thrips tabaci Lind. with special reference to resistance in onions. J. Econ. Entomol. 1935, 28, 678–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Alimousavi, S.A.; Hassandokht, M.R.; Moharramipour, S.A.E.I.D. Evaluation of Iranian onion germplasms for resistance to thrips. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2007, 9, 897–900. [Google Scholar]
  43. Brown, A.S.S.; Simmonds, M.S.; Blaney, W.M. Relationship between nutritional composition of plant species and infestation levels of thrips. J. Chem. Ecol. 2002, 28, 2399–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Steenbergen, M.; Abd-el-Haliem, A.; Bleeker, P.; Dicke, M.; Escobar-Bravo, R.E.R.; Cheng, G.; Haring, M.A.; Kant, M.R.; Kappers, I.; Klinkhamer, P.G.L.; et al. Thrips advisor: Exploiting thrips-induced defenses to combat pests on crops. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 1837–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bhonde, B.N.; Pawar, D.B.; Nikam, D.P. Role of biochemicals in imparting resistance in onion against onion thrips Thrips tabaci Lindeman. Adv. Life Sci. 2016, 5, 8798–8800. [Google Scholar]
  46. Divekar, P.A.; Narayana, S.; Divekar, B.A.; Kumar, R.; Gadratagi, B.G.; Ray, A.; Singh, A.K.; Rani, V.; Singh, V.; Singh, A.K.; et al. Plant Secondary Metabolites as Defense Tools against Herbivores for Sustainable Crop Protection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khalid, M.; Bilal, M.; Huang, D.F. Role of flavonoids in plant interactions with the environment and against human pathogens—A review. J. Integr. Agric. 2019, 18, 211–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Taylor, A.; Vagany, V.; Barbara, D.J.; Thomas, B.; Pink, D.A.C.; Jones, J.E.; Clarkson, J.P. Identification of differential resistance to six Fusarium oxysporum f sp. cepae isolates in commercial onion cultivars through the development of a rapid seedling assay. Plant Pathol. 2013, 62, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zheng, S.; Henken, B.; Wietsma, W.; Sofiari, E.; Jacobsen, E.; Krens, F.A.; Kik, C. Development of bio-assays and screening for resistance to beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua Hübner) in Allium cepa L. and its wild relatives. Euphytica 2000, 114, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hudák, K.; Pénzes, B. Factors influencing the population of the onion thrips on onion. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 2004, 39, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ren, X.; Wu, S.; Xing, Z.; Gao, Y.; Cai, W.; Lei, Z. Abundances of thrips on plants in vegetative and flowering stages are related to plant volatiles. J. Appl. Entomol. 2020, 144, 732–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Porter, D.R.; Jones, H.A. Resistance of some cultivated species of Allium to pink root (Phomaterrestrs). Phytopatology 1933, 23, 298. [Google Scholar]
  53. Jones, H.A.; Mann, L.K. Onions and Their Allies; London Leonard Hill [Books] Limited Interscience Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1963; p. 284. [Google Scholar]
  54. Cryder, C.M. A Study of the Associations of Heritable Traits in Progeny from the Interspecific Backcross (Allium fistulosum × Allium cepa L.) × Allium cepa L. Ph.D. Thesis, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  55. Sueyoshi, T.; Shimomura, K.; Koga, T.; Yamamura, Y.; Takemoto, H. The varietal difference in resistance to stone leek leafminer in Welsh onions. Bull. Fukuoka Agric. Res. Cent. 2006, 25, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
  56. Takeda, M.; Kawai, A.; Mitsunaga, T.; Tsukazaki, H.; Yamashita, K.; Wako, T. A novel method for evaluating the egg killing defenses and varietal resistance of the bunching onion against Liriomyza chinensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae) via the artificial inoculation of eggs. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2020, 55, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Khandagale, K.; Roylawar, P.; Randive, P.; Karuppaiah, V.; Soumia, P.S.; Shirsat, D.; Gedam, P.; Ade, A.; Gawande, S.; Singh, M. Isolation and Expression Profiling of Insecticidal Lectins from Wild Alliums Against Onion Thrips (Thrips tabaci Lindeman). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2020, 92, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tsukazaki, H.; Honjo, M.; Yamashita, K.; Ohara, T.; Kojima, A.; Ohsawa, R.; Wako, T. Classification, and identification of bunching onion (Allium fistulosum) varieties based on SSR markers. Breed. Sci. 2010, 60, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mean (±SE) number of hatched larvae of Thrips tabaci on cvs. Tęcza 1, Alibaba 1, Bila 1, Kroll 2, and Allium roylei. 1 Allium cepa, 2 A. fistulosum. Sample size: Alibaba n = 28, Bila n = 27, Tęcza n = 26, Kroll n = 43, A. roylei n = 37. Means with the same letters on each bar do not differ significantly (Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Mean (±SE) number of hatched larvae of Thrips tabaci on cvs. Tęcza 1, Alibaba 1, Bila 1, Kroll 2, and Allium roylei. 1 Allium cepa, 2 A. fistulosum. Sample size: Alibaba n = 28, Bila n = 27, Tęcza n = 26, Kroll n = 43, A. roylei n = 37. Means with the same letters on each bar do not differ significantly (Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01862 g001
Figure 2. Mean number (±SE) of Thrips tabaci females settled on leaf sections from the two compared onion cultivars/species 10, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min after their release (**/*** bars showing the significant difference in thrips settlement on the compared onion cultivars—Student’s t-test at p < 0.01/0.001); 1 Allium cepa, 2 A. fistulosum. (a) Tęcza × Kroll; (b) Bila × Alibaba; (c) Tęcza × A. roylei; (d) Kroll × A. roylei; (e) Tęcza × Alibaba; (f) Kroll × Alibaba; (g) Tęcza × Bila; (h) Kroll × Bila. Number of repetitions: 12, with only 10 for Tęcza × Kroll.
Figure 2. Mean number (±SE) of Thrips tabaci females settled on leaf sections from the two compared onion cultivars/species 10, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min after their release (**/*** bars showing the significant difference in thrips settlement on the compared onion cultivars—Student’s t-test at p < 0.01/0.001); 1 Allium cepa, 2 A. fistulosum. (a) Tęcza × Kroll; (b) Bila × Alibaba; (c) Tęcza × A. roylei; (d) Kroll × A. roylei; (e) Tęcza × Alibaba; (f) Kroll × Alibaba; (g) Tęcza × Bila; (h) Kroll × Bila. Number of repetitions: 12, with only 10 for Tęcza × Kroll.
Agriculture 13 01862 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Olczyk, M.; Koschier, E.H.; Wójtowicz, T.; Pobożniak, M. The Preference of Thrips tabaci for Allium cepa, Allium fistulosum, and Allium roylei. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101862

AMA Style

Olczyk M, Koschier EH, Wójtowicz T, Pobożniak M. The Preference of Thrips tabaci for Allium cepa, Allium fistulosum, and Allium roylei. Agriculture. 2023; 13(10):1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101862

Chicago/Turabian Style

Olczyk, Marta, Elisabeth H. Koschier, Tomasz Wójtowicz, and Maria Pobożniak. 2023. "The Preference of Thrips tabaci for Allium cepa, Allium fistulosum, and Allium roylei" Agriculture 13, no. 10: 1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101862

APA Style

Olczyk, M., Koschier, E. H., Wójtowicz, T., & Pobożniak, M. (2023). The Preference of Thrips tabaci for Allium cepa, Allium fistulosum, and Allium roylei. Agriculture, 13(10), 1862. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101862

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop