Next Article in Journal
Description of Meteorological Indices Presented Based on Long-Term Yields of Winter Wheat in Southern Germany
Next Article in Special Issue
Selection and Phenotyping for Drought Tolerance in Somatic Hybrids between Solanum tuberosum and Solanum bulbocastanum That Show Resistance to Late Blight, by Using a Semi-Automated Plant Phenotyping Platform
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Microbial Community Responses to Cyanobacteria versus Traditional Organic Fertilizers
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Hydro-Priming and Proline Priming of Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Seeds on Germination, Photosynthetic Pigments and Metal Metabolism under Cadmium Stress
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 13
Issue 10
10.3390/agriculture13101903
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Does Sodium Nitroprusside Alleviate Water Deficit Stress in Impatiens walleriana Shoots Grown In Vitro?

by
Marija Đurić
,
Milana Trifunović-Momčilov
*,
Snežana Milošević
,
Marija Marković
,
Olga Radulović
,
Angelina Subotić
and
Branka Uzelac
Department for Plant Physiology, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”—National Institute of Republic of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Bulevar Despota Stefana 142, 11060 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(10), 1903; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101903
Submission received: 21 August 2023 / Revised: 12 September 2023 / Accepted: 14 September 2023 / Published: 28 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Abiotic Stress on Horticultural Crops)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Impatiens walleriana is a decorative horticultural plant species. Commercial production requires that the plants be brought to market, often accompanied by reduced water content during transport. Drought significantly affects metabolic processes in plants. The effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced water deficit on shoots of I. walleriana were investigated using different mechanisms at the biochemical level. In addition, the potential water deficit-ameliorating effect of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) was tested. Shoots of I. walleriana were initially grown on MS media supplemented with SNP (50, 100 and 250 μM). After pre-treatments, shoots were further transferred to media supplemented with PEG8000 (3%) and/or SNP (50, 100 and 250 μM). Water deficit conditions increased proline, photosynthetic pigments, malondialdehyde (MDA), H2O2, total phenolic content and antioxidant activity. In addition, PEG-induced water deficit increased superoxide dismutase (SOD) and peroxidase (POX) activities but decreased catalase (CAT) activity. SNP did not significantly affect photosynthetic pigments and total phenolic content but increased proline accumulation, MDA and H2O2 content, especially when applied simultaneously with PEG. Moreover, none of the investigated SNP pretreatments significantly altered the activities of SOD, POX, and CAT in I. walleriana. The results indicate that exogenous application of SNP effectively alleviated water deficit stress in shoots of I. walleriana grown in vitro.

1. Introduction

Under natural conditions, drought implies the lack of water in the substrate caused by insufficient atmospheric precipitation or an intense plant transpiration process [1]. Drought is an abiotic stressor that negatively affects all developmental stages of the plant organism, including tissue dehydration, inhibition of cell elongation, differentiation and division, and reduction of basic physiological and metabolic processes, causing visible morphological changes [2]. The sensitivity of plant species to drought depends on their genotype, ontogenetic stage, additional stress-inducing factors, and the intensity, frequency, and duration of drought [3]. To increase drought resistance, plants respond through a complex network of interactions at all levels of organization. The accumulation of osmoprotectants, proteins with a protective role, and various products of secondary metabolism underlies plants tolerance to drought [4]. The effects of numerous stress factors, including drought, lead to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and disruption of cellular homeostasis [5]. In terms of cell membrane structure and function, lipid peroxidation is one of the best-studied markers of ROS action [6]. The balance between non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants is crucial for the elimination of ROS. Non-enzymatic antioxidants such as soluble sugars, alcohols, glycine-betaine and organic acids, proline and phenolic compounds play an important role in osmoprotection under various abiotic stresses [7,8,9]. As antioxidants, proline and phenolic compounds can eliminate free radicals or prevent the production of ROS [10,11]. Superoxide dismutases (SOD), peroxidases (POX), ascorbate peroxidases (APX), catalases (CAT), dehydroascorbate reductases (DHAR), monodehydroascorbate reductases (MDHAR) and glutathione reductases (GR) represent the main classes of enzymatic antioxidants [12].
Nitric oxide (NO), formally known as nitric monoxide, has long been recognised as a multifunctional signalling molecule in many physiological and pathological processes in animal and plant organisms. Because NO is a colourless, gaseous compound, with a half-life of only a few seconds, it does not require a carrier to cross the plasma membrane and diffuse rapidly to intracellular targets [13]. Recently, the role of NO in numerous developmental processes, including seed germination, root formation, gravitropism, mitochondrial functionality, photosynthesis, senescence, stomatal movements, and plant maturation, has been investigated [14]. In addition, NO participates in mitigating various abiotic stresses such as drought, salt, heat, UV light and metal ions [15]. The most used NO donor is sodium nitroprusside (SNP). This sodium salt comprises ferrous iron complexed with nitric oxide and five cyanide ions. Since NO is a gaseous molecule and direct exposure is technically difficult, NO donors that form transition metal-NO complexes are usually applied exogenously in vitro. The application of SNP improved photosynthetic rate membrane stability, reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) and H2O2 content, increased proline accumulation, and improved activity of antioxidant enzymes in drought-stressed plants [16]. Since SNP is a water-soluble salt, it is readily taken up by plant roots. As a NO donor, SNP can potentially improve plant tolerance both in vitro and ex vitro. Many studies also suggest that the application of SNP in the field/greenhouse could improve plant growth and development [17,18,19].
The genus Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) encompasses one of the largest genera of flowering plants [20]. The best-known plant species of this genus is Impatiens walleriana, a herbaceous annual plant with fleshy, succulent leaves and various coloured flowers [21]. Due to its decorative properties and long flowering period, from early spring to late autumn, I. walleriana is considered a very popular horticultural species worldwide [22]. Lack of water leads to a rapid decrease in cell turgor and tissue dehydration. Accordingly, insufficient water supply in the substrate during cultivation and especially during transport may have an unfavourable effect on growth and development and the decorative properties of I. walleriana.
Polyethylene glycol (PEG) with higher molecular weight (4000–8000) is a non-phytotoxic and non-penetrating, non-ionic water-soluble polymer that lowers the osmotic potential of nutrient solutions [23,24]. PEG stimulates water deficit, so it is very suitable for inducing irrigation limitation simulating the drought under controlled experimental conditions [25,26]. To our knowledge, only a few reports describe PEG-induced drought stress in two species of the genus Impatiens, two conducted under ex vitro and one under in vitro conditions. The first report described that PEG-induced drought stress altered the morphology and nutrient concentration of hydroponically grown I. walleriana plants [27], while the other report described the effect of PEG-induced drought stress on the germination rate, root length, enzymatic activity, and MDA content of I. balsamina [28]. The responses of I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced physiological drought in vitro and the possible effect of exogenous salicylic acid as a stress-ameliorating agent have been described only recently [21].
The alleviating role of SNP in water deficit has also been investigated in numerous plant species [29]. Considering that the growth and development of I. walleriana is highly dependent on water presence in the substrate, the use of SNP under PEG-induced water deficit stress in I. walleriana has been investigated for the first time. Therefore, in the present work, the effect of SNP on the potential mitigation effect of PEG-induced water deficit stress conditions in I. walleriana shoots grown in vitro was presented at the biochemical level.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material, Growth Media, Culture Conditions and Treatments Pattern

Shoot explants used as primary plant material in this work, derived from mother stock cultures of I. walleriana (cultivar “Xtreme Scarlet”) plants, were cultured on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium [30] containing 30 gL−1 sucrose, 100 mgL−1 myo-inositol and 7 gL−1 agar. I. walleriana shoot explants (~2 cm long, Figure 1) were grown on MS medium without plant growth regulators or MS media supplemented with SNP at different concentrations (50, 100 and 250 μM) for three weeks. After these pretreatments, I. walleriana shoots were further transferred to fresh MS nutrient media supplemented with PEG8000 (3%) and/or SNP (at the respective concentrations) for one-week treatment (Figure 1). All media tested were adjusted to pH 5.8 with NaOH/HCl and autoclaved at 121 °C for 25 min. In vitro cultures were grown at 25 ± 2 °C and under a long-day photoperiod (16/8 h light/dark) provided by “Tesla” white fluorescent lamps (65 W, 4500 K), with a photosynthetic photon flux density of 47 μmol s−1 m−2.

2.2. Analyses of Biochemical Parameters during Different SNP Treatments

For all biochemical analyses (free proline content, total polyphenol content and antioxidant activity, photosynthetic pigments, MDA and H2O2 content, as well as the activity of antioxidative enzymes), leaves with petioles were collected from in vitro grown I. walleriana shoots after a total of four weeks of experimentation. All plant material was deep frozen (−80 °C) before analyses.

2.2.1. Protective Metabolite: Free Proline Content

Free proline content was determined by ninhydrin (2,2-dihydroxyindane-1,3-dione) reaction according to the modified method of Carillo and Gibon [31]. Shoots of I. walleriana (250 mg) were homogenised in liquid nitrogen, and methanol extraction of free amino acids was carried out. After centrifugation, the supernatant was mixed with Chloroform and water. The aqueous phase was re-extracted with Chloroform, separated, and evaporated to dryness. The samples were resuspended in water, and the plant sample (or proline standard) was mixed with ninhydrin reagent. The samples were further incubated in a water bath at 100 °C, then cooled and diluted in ethanol. The absorbance of the yellow reaction product was measured at 350 nm. Background absorbance was corrected with reactions using ethanol instead of ninhydrin, in parallel for each sample as a blank. Proline content was determined from the standard curve. Results are expressed as μM/g of sample fresh weight. Spectrophotometric determination of free proline was performed using an ELISA Micro Plate Reader (LKB 5060–006, Winooski, VT, USA).

2.2.2. Oxidative Damage: Photosynthetic Pigments, MDA and H2O2 Content

Photosynthetic pigment content was determined using 96% ethanol, as proposed by Lichtenthaler [32]. I. walleriana leaves (20 mg) were immersed and heated in a water bath at 70 °C. After incubation, the absorbance of photosynthetic pigments (at 470, 648, and 664 nm) was measured using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (Agilent 8453, Life Sciences, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Results are expressed as mg/g of sample fresh weight.
The level of lipid peroxidation was measured through MDA content according to the procedure described by Heath and Packer [33]. Shoots of I. walleriana (100 mg) were homogenised in liquid nitrogen. Extraction was performed with 0.1% triChloroacetic acid (TCA). The obtained homogenate was centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min, and 20% TCA and 0.5% 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA) were added to the supernatant. The reaction mixture was first heated at 95 °C for 30 min in a water bath and immediately cooled on ice. After centrifugation at 4 °C for 10 min, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 532 and 600 nm. Results are expressed as μM/g of sample fresh weight.
The content of H2O2 was determined according to Velikova et al. [34]. As for MDA determination, shoots of I. walleriana (150 mg) were homogenised in liquid nitrogen and extracted with 0.1% TCA. The homogenate was centrifuged at 4 °C for 15 min. The supernatant obtained was mixed with 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 1 M KI. The absorbance of H2O2 was measured at 390 nm, and the results are expressed as μM/g of sample fresh weight. Spectrophotometric determination of MDA and H2O2 was performed using an ELISA Micro Plate Reader (LKB 5060–006, Winooski, VT, USA).

2.2.3. Nonenzymatic Antioxidants: Total Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Activity of Secondary Metabolites

Total polyphenol content was determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (FC test) based on the method of Singleton et al. [35]. Shoots of I. walleriana (200 mg) were homogenised in liquid nitrogen and extracted in 96% ethanol. The extracts were further incubated at room temperature for 60 min and then centrifuged for 15 min. The obtained supernatant was further incubated together with FC reagent at room temperature in the dark. After 90 min, the blue-colored complex was quantified spectrophotometrically at 765 nm. Gallic acid (GA) was used as a standard phenol.
Antioxidant activity based on the concentration of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) radical was determined in I. walleriana shoots prepared the same way as for the FC test. The free radical scavenging capacity was determined by the DPPH assay described previously [36,37]. The reaction mixture containing the DPPH reagent solution was prepared using methanol and the supernatant of the sample. After 60 min at room temperature and under dark conditions, the degree of DPPH radical reduction was determined by measuring the absorbance at 520 nm.
Total polyphenol content (expressed as mM GA/g of sample fresh weight) and antioxidant activity (expressed as % of DPPH reduction) were described in detail by Đurić et al. [38]. Spectrophotometric determination of non-enzymatic antioxidants was performed using an ELISA Micro Plate Reader (LKB 5060–006, Winooski, VT, USA).

2.2.4. Enzymatic Antioxidants: SOD, CAT and POX Activity

Total soluble protein extracts for all enzyme assays were prepared by grinding the leaves (1 g) in liquid nitrogen and homogenising in extraction buffer containing 50 mM Tris pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 30% glycerol, 1.5% polyvinylpolypyrrolidone, 10 mM dithiothreitol and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The extracts were centrifuged for 5 min to spin down the solids and then stored at −80 °C until use. According to Bradford, protein concentration was determined from a standard curve made using bovine serum albumin solution [39].
SOD activity was determined spectrophotometrically using a slightly modified method by Beyer and Fridowich [40]. The reaction mixture contained 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 260 mM methionine, 1.5 mM nitroblue tetrazolium Chloride (NBT) and 0.04 mM riboflavin. For each sample, six dilutions were prepared. The reaction mixture was pre-illuminated for 2 min, and then SOD activity was determined spectrophotometrically at 540 nm, using an ELISA Micro Plate Reader (LKB 5060–006, Winooski, VT, USA).
The spectrophotometric assay for CAT activity was carried out by the method described by Aebi [41]. While POX activity was determined according to Kukavica and Veljović-Jovanović [42], both methods were described in detail by Milošević et al. [43]. The spectrophotometric assay for CAT activity is based on the measurement of the decrease in absorbance at 240 nm. The reaction mixture consisted of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 20 mM H2O2 and enzyme extract. The kinetics of CAT activity was measured every 20 s for 3 min, where one unit of CAT activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that degrades 1 μmol of H2O2 in 1 min.
The reaction mixture for determination of POX activity contained 0.05 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and 1 M pyrogallol as enzyme substrate. The reaction was started by the addition of 30% H2O2 after the first 20 s. The POX catalysed the oxidation of pyrogallol with H2O2 to purpurogallin, which was monitored by absorbance determination at 430 nm. Measurements of CAT and POX activities were performed using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Agilent 8453, Life Sciences, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
The activities of all antioxidant enzymes are expressed as U/mg protein. Measurements for all antioxidant enzyme analyses were repeated three times.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The effects of fourteen SNP pretreatments/treatments on different biochemical parameters of I. walleriana shoot explants were evaluated after four weeks of culture using standard two-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 10 software (StatSoft, Hamburg, Germany). Determination of all analysed parameters was performed on three biological samples per treatment. In addition, the absorbance values of all supernatants were measured three times for each sample. The results are presented as means ± standard errors. Comparisons between means were made using Fisher’s LSD (least significant difference) post-hoc test calculated at a confidence level of p ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

To investigate whether SNP acts as a stress-ameliorating agent during PEG-induced water deficit, I. walleriana shoot explants were grown in vitro for four weeks on fourteen combinations of SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments. Pretreatments with 50, 100 and 250 μM SNP in combination with MS treatment did not alter the morphology of I. walleriana shoots (Figure 2, first row). Treatment with PEG had a negative effect on the growth of SNP-pretreated shoots (Figure 2, second row). Moreover, treatment with PEG after MS pretreatment reduced the usual growth compared to all combinations where MS treatment was investigated. The growth of SNP-pretreated I. walleriana shoots was favoured by the simultaneous application of PEG and SNP, compared with PEG alone (Figure 2, third row). Unexpectedly, pretreatments with 50, 100 and 250 μM SNP followed by treatments with the same SNP concentrations enhanced growth of I. walleriana shoots compared to MS treatment (Figure 2, fourth row).

3.1. Free Proline Content

In the control group of shoots, proline content was significantly increased under water stress conditions compared to non-stressed conditions (Figure 3). A similar pattern was observed in pretreatments with 50, 100, and 250 μM SNP. After pretreatment with 50 and 100 μM SNP, proline content in shoots grown on MS medium was similar to that in control, I. walleriana shoots grown under water deficit conditions on PEG. On the other hand, proline content in shoots subjected to pretreatment with 250 μM SNP was similar to that in the non-stressed control shoots. Pretreatment with all SNP concentrations did not significantly alter proline content in shoots treated with PEG compared to control water-stressed conditions. The combination of pretreatment and treatment with a single SNP treatment at each concentration did not alter proline content compared to control shoots grown under non-stressed conditions. The combination of PEG and SNP at all concentrations in the treatments significantly increased proline content compared to both control groups. The same pattern was observed in pretreatments with 100 and 250 μM SNP. After treatment with MS, proline content was similar to control shoots treated with PEG (after 100 μM SNP treatment) and non-stressed control shoots (after 250 μM SNP treatment).

3.2. Photosynthetic Pigments, MDA and H2O2 Content

In control groups of I. walleriana shoots pretreated with MS alone, it was found that PEG slightly increased total Chlorophyll (Chl) content (Figure 4). Pretreatment with 50 μM SNP significantly increased total Chl content only when PEG was used as treatment. The combination of PEG and 50 μM SNP in treatment decreased the total Chl content compared to both control groups. Pretreatment with 100 μM SNP increased total Chl content after the three treatments applied (MS, PEG and 100 μM SNP) compared to both control groups. Pretreatment with 250 μM SNP also significantly increased total Chl content in two treatment groups when MS or PEG were used. Interestingly, in each experimental group, treatment with PEG and SNP reduced total Chl content.
Analysis of carotenoid content showed that approximately the same values were obtained in both control groups of I. walleriana shoots pretreated with MS and treated with MS or PEG (Figure 5). Pretreatment with 50 μM SNP significantly decreased carotenoid content only after treatment with PEG compared with both control groups. In addition, a slight decrease in carotenoid content was observed in I. walleriana leaves after treatment with the combination of PEG and SNP. A moderate increase in carotenoid content was observed only after treatment with 50 μM SNP. Pretreatment with 100 μM SNP significantly decreased carotenoid content when the same SNP concentration was used for treatment. All other treatments did not significantly change the carotenoid content compared with the control groups. In contrast to all other SNP concentrations, pretreatment with 250 μM SNP decreased total carotenoid content in I. walleriana leaves after all four applied treatments, with the greatest reduction of carotenoid content after PEG treatment.
Only a small increase in MDA content was detected in two control groups of I. walleriana shoots (Figure 6). In general, all SNP pretreatments increased MDA content in all experimental groups. After the first pretreatment with 50 μM SNP, lipid peroxidation was similar in shoots grown on MS and medium supplemented with PEG. Treatment with 50 μM SNP decreased MDA content but was still significantly higher than in both control groups. The combination medium containing 50 μM SNP and PEG increased MDA content to the highest value. The pretreatments with 100 and 250 μM SNP showed the same trend. A slight increase in MDA content was observed in shoots grown on MS medium compared to the control groups. The addition of PEG significantly increased MDA content. Treatments with 100 and 250 μM SNP, alone or in combination with PEG, decreased the level of lipid peroxidation, but MDA content was still higher than in both control groups.
Treatment with PEG in the control group of I. walleriana shoots increased H2O2 content (Figure 7). Pretreatment with 50 μM SNP increased H2O2 content only after the simultaneous application of PEG and SNP. Similar to the changes in MDA content, the same trend was observed for H2O2 content after pretreatments with 100 and 250 μM SNP. In I. walleriana shoots grown on MS medium, H2O2 content was similar to the control groups. Treatment with PEG significantly increased H2O2 content, while treatments with 100 and 250 μM SNP decreased H2O2 content. The highest H2O2 content, after pretreatment with 50 μM SNP, was observed in shoots grown on medium supplemented with a combination of PEG and 100 or 250 μM SNP.

3.3. Total Polyphenol Content and Antioxidant Activity

Control shoots of I. walleriana exposed to PEG had increased total phenolic content (Figure 8). Interestingly, the total phenolic content did not change significantly after most SNP pretreatments and treatments compared to both control groups. Accordingly, increased phenolic content was detected after pretreatment with 50 μM SNP in shoots grown on MS or PEG-supplemented MS medium. In addition, a significant increase in total phenolic content was detected after pretreatment with 250 μM SNP in shoots grown only on MS medium supplemented with PEG.
During the control treatment, PEG-induced water deficit increased antioxidant activity in the shoots of I. walleriana (Figure 9). It is very important to note that DPPH activity was significantly increased after all applied SNP pretreatments compared to both control groups.

3.4. Superoxide Dismutase, Catalase and Peroxidase Activity

In control plants, SOD activity was slightly increased in water deficit-stressed shoots (Figure 10). After SNP pretreatments, the SOD activity in shoots grown on MS medium was similar to that in shoots grown under both control conditions. Also, SOD activity did not change significantly in shoots of I. walleriana treated with SNP only, compared to both groups of control shoots. It was also found that PEG-imposed water deficit, alone or with SNP, significantly decreased SOD activity after all SNP pretreatments compared to control.
I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-imposed water deficit had significantly lower CAT activity than control shoots grown on MS (Figure 11). SNP pretreatments maintained CAT activity in shoots grown on MS as in both control groups of shoots, except after 100 μM SNP pretreatment, where CAT activity was significantly decreased. PEG-imposed water dificit also decreased CAT activity in shoots pretreated with all applied SNP concentrations. It was also noted that SNP concentrations were positively correlated with increased CAT activity in shoots treated with SNP only. The media containing PEG and SNP (50 and 100 μM) decreased CAT activity compared to both control groups of shoots. Only treatment with 250 μM SNP, alone or with PEG, increased CAT activity compared to other applied treatments, but this increase was still at the level of CAT activity detected in control shoots grown on MS.
PEG-imposed water deficit conditions significantly increased POX activity under control conditions (Figure 12). In shoots grown on MS, SNP pretreatments did not significantly alter POX activity compared with the corresponding control group. Also, the activity of POX remained unchanged after all SNP pretreatments in I. walleriana shoots grown on PEG-imposed water deficit. On the other hand, POX activity was significantly decreased in shoots treated with only 50 and 100 μM SNP compared with the control groups. Further treatment, which implied the combination of PEG and SNP, did not significantly change POX activity compared to control groups.

4. Discussion

Drought is one of the most common problems in agriculture, horticulture and forestry worldwide and ultimately affects crop productivity, resulting in reduced plant growth and development. In nature, lack of water in the substrate and intense transpiration are usually associated with the effects of high temperatures. Prolonged and intense drought can cause death even in the most tolerant plant species [44]. Accordingly, various techniques are used to produce commercially important plant species whose productivity may be limited by drought [45]. One of the most readily applicable and profitable techniques is the use of various pretreatments to overcome drought, including reactive oxygen-nitrogen-sulphur species, which can effectively influence plant tolerance to various abiotic stresses [46]. This work investigated how SNP, a widely used NO donor, affects various biochemical parameters of I. walleriana shoots grown in vitro under PEG-induced water deficit.
Osmoprotectants include compounds such as amino acids, sugars, alcohol sugars, organic acids and ions that allow more efficient water uptake from the substrate to the roots. The proline indicates different types of abiotic stress [47]. Water deficit conditions increased proline content in water-stressed I. walleriana shoots compared to those grown on MS medium. Previous investigations showed that PEG-treated I. walleriana shoots also accumulated cellular proline [21]. Increased accumulation of proline under PEG-induced water stress was also found in numerous plant species, including Vitis vinifera [48], several cultivars of sugarcane [49], and Vanilla planifolia [50]. Existing literature data show that exogenous application of SNP promoted water stress resistance through proline accumulation in safflower and lime [51,52]. The results presented in this work showed that SNP increased proline accumulation in shoots only after its simultaneous application with PEG. Increased proline content due to water deficit could be related to increased activity of different enzymes regulating the proline biosynthesis [53].
Since photosynthesis is directly dependent on photosynthetic pigments, the content of total Chl and carotenoids was studied. Decreased Chl content, due to impaired biosynthesis due to tissue water deficiency, was found in apple and cherry [54], blueberry [55] and many other plant species. Interestingly, PEG-induced water deficit did not significantly alter the total Chl content in shoots of I. walleriana (Figure 4). It should be noted that increased Chl content during dehydration is an unusual phenomenon. However, a few reports of unchanged or even increased Chl content during water deficit stress induced by PEG in highly water stress-tolerant grass Bouteloua gracilis [56] and rice cultivars [57]. Drought also affects the biosynthesis and metabolism of carotenoids in plants [54,58]. Previously, it was reported that carotenoid content decreased significantly under drought stress conditions compared to the well-watered control [59,60]. However, our study showed that the carotenoid content of I. walleriana shoots remained quite stable after PEG-induced water deficit (Figure 5). This observation agrees with the recent results in a sensitive and drought-tolerant Thymus species, where drought did not alter the carotenoid content [61]. Since Chloroplast damage usually results in reduced carotenoid content, it is quite possible that unchanged pigment content during drought indicates ROS scavenging by antioxidants, which could explain better drought resistance [62]. According to the available literature data, dissociation of SNP releases iron and thus prevents Chlorosis of tissues by increasing Chl content in plants [14]. Accordingly, all SNP pretreatments increased Chl content in I. walleriana shoots grown on MS and 3% PEG. In contrast, pretreatments followed by treatments with SNP only did not affect Chl content compared to both control groups of I. walleriana shoots. The same observation was made in sunflower plants grown under drought stress [61]. It is well known that Chloroplasts play a key role in plant physiology due to various metabolic processes in membrane complexes. In addition to photosynthesis, Chloroplasts also synthesize amino acids, fatty acids, and various secondary metabolites. The altered Chl content in shoots of I. walleriana under PEG-induced water deficit can be explained by other mechanisms that involve Chloroplasts but exclude the process of photosynthesis. As in the case of Chl, carotenoid content in sunflower plants grown under water deficit stress was not affected by SNP [63]. SNP pretreatments decreased or did not significantly alter carotenoid content compared to both control groups of I. walleriana shoots. The effect of SNP on photosynthetic pigment content depends on several factors, including the applied SNP concentration, various stress conditions, and the plant species itself.
Lipid peroxidation is the reaction of oxygen with unsaturated lipids, producing a wide range of oxidation products [64]. A secondary product of lipid peroxidation, MDA, and its reaction with thiobarbituric acid has been used for many years as a suitable biomarker for determining lipid peroxidation. Normally, MDA content increases significantly during drought [65,66]. In the present study, MDA content increased slightly under PEG-induced water deficit compared to I. walleriana shoots grown on MS medium (Figure 6). Numerous studies have shown that the application of NO reduced oxidative damage, which was confirmed by reduced MDA content in PEG-stressed cultivars of rapeseed [67], two Indian mustard genotypes [68] and two watermelon genotypes [69]. Our results showed that, in general, all SNP pretreatments increased MDA content in I. walleriana shoots under PEG-induced water deficit. Although exogenous NO treatment under drought stress often reduces lipid peroxidation in plants, it is also known that NO can cause nitrosative stress under different abiotic stress conditions [70]. However, it is quite possible that oxidative stress was accompanied by nitrosative stress in the I. walleriana shoots studied.
Another expression of negative stimuli during drought is the formation of H2O2 in plant tissues. Drought stress resulted in higher H2O2 content in wheat [71], apple and cherry cultivars [54], sugar beet [72] and many others. The results obtained in this work showed that water limitation caused by PEG led to a significant increase in H2O2 content in I. walleriana shoots (Figure 7). As in the case of MDA, there are literature data describing the inhibitory effect of SNP on H2O2 production in Malus hupehensis [73], Allium hirtifolium [74], and pea seeds [75]. The results of this work show that all SNP pre-treatments and MDA increased H2O2 content in water deficit-stressed I. walleriana shoots. The highest H2O2 levels were observed in shoots grown on media supplemented with PEG and SNP. This result confirmed the hypothesis that increased MDA and H2O2 content induced nitrosative stress and enhanced the deleterious effects on plant tissues, previously described by Santisree et al. [76].
Polyphenols, the largest group of secondary metabolites, play an important role in plant growth and development during abiotic stress [77]. As antioxidants, polyphenols are very important for the removal of ROS forms and the prevention of damage to macromolecules and membranes [78]. A recent review reported increased accumulation of phenolic compounds during dehydration in many plant species [3]. The increased total phenolic content in control I. walleriana shoots exposed to PEG indicated a positive regulation of polyphenol biosynthesis and their role in neutralizing the negative effects of dehydration manifested by oxidative stress (Figure 8). It is known that dehydration positively regulates many genes involved in the biosynthetic pathways of polyphenolic components to increase their concentration during the stress period [78]. The accumulation of phenolic compounds (phenol, flavonoid, and anthocyanin) during drought and SNP application was reported in cotton plants [79], wheat [80], and marjoram [18]. It was interesting to note that SNP pretreatments and treatments did not significantly alter total phenolic content compared to either or both control groups of I. walleriana shoots. Phenolic compounds are known to reduce lipid peroxidation by scavenging hydroxyl radicals, which may be due to the activation of phenylamino lyase gene expression [81]. Considering that the total phenolic content did not change significantly, this could explain why the MDA content in I. walleriana shoots increased during the PEG-induced water deficit.
The antioxidant capacity is usually measured by the reduction degree of DPPH radicals. It is often used as a fast, simple, and reliable method [82]. Secondary metabolites react with radical forms as antioxidants and protect macromolecules from oxidation processes. Increased activity of antioxidants during dehydration was found in tomato [83], melinjo [84], sweet leaf [85] and many other plant species. The results showed that PEG-induced water deficit also increased antioxidant activity in I. walleriana leaves (Figure 9). Under stress conditions, plant cells always try to establish an intracellular balance between ROS production and antioxidants. At the same time, however, normal metabolic processes produce free radicals that must be removed by antioxidants. It is known that NO can act as an antioxidant in plant tissues. The beneficial effect on oxidative balance and antioxidant activity has been demonstrated in peach fruits and rice leaves [86]. It is important to note that all SNP pretreatments significantly increased DPPH activity in I. walleriana leaves. Although these results do not fully correlate with the total phenolic content, they suggest that I. walleriana shoots utilize the antioxidant properties of some other secondary metabolites as a protective mechanism during tissue dehydration.
The activities of antioxidant enzymes are often analysed in the context of various abiotic and biotic stress factors. Although SOD acts as the first in defense against ROS, other enzymatic components, including CAT and POX, also act as part of the antioxidant defense system [87]. In most cases, an increased concentration of ROS forms in cells increases the activity of antioxidant enzymes to establish homeostasis. However, the activity of some enzymes may remain unchanged or even decrease with increasing concentrations of ROS. Increased activity of SOD and POX during PEG-induced dehydration was found in numerous plant species, such as Triticum aestivum [88], Triticum turgidum [89], and Cyclocarya paliurus [90]. The results presented in this work showed that under control conditions, the activity of SOD was slightly increased in I. walleriana shoots during water deficit (Figure 10). Also, PEG-imposed water deficit conditions significantly increased POX activity in control conditions (Figure 12). On the other hand, in some plant species, reduced CAT activity was detected in response to water deficit stress conditions [91,92,93]. Accordingly, the activity of CAT was significantly reduced in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-imposed water deficit, compared to control shoots grown on MS (Figure 11). Such a reduction of CAT activity in I. walleriana shoots could be due to an inhibition of CAT synthesis or an altered assembly of enzyme subunits under water deficit.
The prevalent NO donor SNPs function as signaling molecules in plants and regulate the expression of many defense enzymes. Moreover, NO-mediated responses under drought conditions were mainly dependent on the upregulation of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POX, and CAT [16]. Available literature data suggest that the application of SNP [94,95] did not significantly depend on the physiological state of the plant [96] or even inhibited the activity of antioxidant enzymes [97]. The present study showed that all investigated SNP pretreatment, generally, did not significantly change SOD and POX activities in I. walleriana shoots. There were only two exceptions during the imposed water deficit when PEG alone or with SNP significantly decreased SOD activity in all SNP-pretreated shoots compared to control. The activity of POX also decreased significantly in shoots treated with all SNP concentrations compared to both control groups.
Interestingly, all SNP pretreatments applied did not significantly alter or decrease CAT activity. Only treatment with PEG and 250 μM SNP together increased CAT activity. However, this increase was also observed in control shoots grown on MS. All these findings suggest that SNPs can negatively affect enzymatic antioxidants during water deficit stress. These adverse effects appear to depend on several factors, including plant species, the type of antioxidant enzyme and the type of abiotic stress applied.

5. Conclusions

The presented results showed that PEG-induced water deficit had deleterious effects on the shoots of I. walleriana. All biochemical parameters analysed confirmed an increase in oxidative stress. These observations indicate that I. walleriana shoots are highly sensitive to water deficit in the substrate. The drought-ameliorating potential of SNP in I. walleriana shoots grown in vitro was tested by exogenous supplementation of growth medium with SNP. The results showed that the values of analysed parameters increased or remained unchanged after the PEG-induced water deficit. In an overall assessment, our results demonstrate for the first time that SNP has beneficial effects on biochemical parameters only when applied together with PEG, but not individually, to in vitro grown I. walleriana shoots.

Author Contributions

S.M. contributed to all in vitro experiments. S.M., M.Đ., M.T.-M., M.M. and O.R. contributed to all experimental work considering biochemical analyses. A.S. contributed to the experimental design and supervised the whole study. B.U. contributed to data analysis results interpretation and also contributed to preparing the final manuscript. M.T.-M. wrote and prepared the text manuscript. All authors were involved in reviewing, editing, and approving the final manuscript version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development, and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia, contract numbers 451-03-47/2023-01/200007.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not published data related to this paper are available on reasonable request to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors owe special thanks to Nikola Stamenković who assisted in the preparation of the tissue samples and the subsequent biochemical analyses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Murtaza, G.; Rasool, F.; Habib, R.; Javed, T.; Sardar, K.; Ayub, M.; Ayub, A.; Rasool, A. A review of morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants under drought stress conditions. Imp. J. Interdis Res. 2016, 2, 1600–1606. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anjum, S.A.; Ashraf, U.; Zohaib, A.; Tanveer, M.; Naeem, M.; Ali, I.; Tabassum, T.; Nazir, U. Growth and development responses of crop plants under drought stress: A review. Zemdirbyste 2017, 104, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kapoor, D.; Bhardwaj, S.; Landi, M.; Sharma, A.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Sharma, A. The impact of drought in plant metabolism: How to exploit tolerance mechanisms to increase crop production. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Takahashi, F.; Kuromori, T.; Urano, K.; Zamaguchi-Shizonaki, K. Drought stress responses and resistance in plants: From cellular responses to long-distance intercellular communication. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 556972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gupta, D.K.; Palma, J.M.; Corpas, F.J. Production Sites of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in Organelles from Plant Cells. In Reactive Oxygen Species and Oxidative Damage in Plants under Stress; Gupta, D.K., Palma, J.M., Corpas, F.J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Asthir, B. Protective mechanisms of heat tolerance in crop plants. J. Plant Interact. 2015, 10, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Singh, M.; Kumar, J.; Singh, S.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M. Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: A review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio./Technol. 2015, 14, 407–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shah, A.; Smith, D.L. Flavonoids in agriculture: Chemistry and roles in, biotic and abiotic stress responses, and microbial associations. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Signorelli, S.; Coitino, E.L.; Borsani, O.; Monza, J. Molecular mechanisms for the reaction between •OH radicals and proline: Insights on the role as reactive oxygen species scavenger in plant stress. J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Soares, C.; Carvalho, M.E.; Azevedo, R.A.; Fidalgo, F. Plants facing oxidative challenges-A little help from the antioxidant networks. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 161, 4–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dvorak, P.; Krasylenko, Y.; Zeiner, A.; Samaj, J.; Takac, T. Signaling toward ROS-scavenging enzymes in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cevahir, G.; Aytamka, E.; Erol, Ç. The role of nitric oxide in plants. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2007, 2, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Santisree, P.; Adimulam, S.S.; Sharma, K.; Bhatnagar-Mathur, P.; Sharma, K.K. Insights into the Nitric Oxide Mediated Stress Tolerance in Plants. In Plant Signaling Molecules; Khan, M.I.R., Sudhakar Reddy, P., Ferrante, A., Khan, N.A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 385–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kolbert, Z.; Barroso, J.B.; Brouquisse, R.; Corpas, F.J.; Gupta, K.J.; Lindermayr, C.; Loake, G.J.; Palma, J.M.; Petřivalsky, M.; Wendehenne, D.; et al. A forty year journey: The generation and roles of NO in plants. Nitric Oxide 2019, 93, 53–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chakraborty, N.; Acharya, K. “NO way”! Says the plant to abiotic stress. Plant Genome 2017, 11, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jangid, K.K.; Dwivedi, P. Physiological and biochemical changes by nitric oxide and brassinosteroid in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under drought stress. Acta Physiol. Plant 2017, 39, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Farouk, S.; Al-Huqail, A.A. Sodium nitroprusside application regulates antioxidant capacity, improves phytopharmaceutical production and essential oil yield of marjoram herb under drought. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2020, 158, 113034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Majeed, S.; Nawaz, F.; Naeem, M.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Ejaz, S.; Ahmad, K.S.; Tauseef, S.; Farid, G.; Khalid, I.; Mehmood, K. Nitric oxide regulates water status and associated enzymatic pathways to inhibit nutrients imbalance in maize (Zea mays L.) under drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 147–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Janssens, S.B.; Knox, E.B.; Huysmans, S.; Smets, E.F.; Merckx, V.S. Rapid radiation of Impatiens (Balsaminaceae) during Pliocene and Pleistocene: Result of a global climate change. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2009, 52, 806–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Antonić, D.; Milošević, S.; Cingel, A.; Lojić, M.; Trifunović-Momčilov, M.; Petrić, M.; Subotić, A.; Simonović, A. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid on Impatiens walleriana L grown in vitro under polyethylene glycol-imposed drought. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 105, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pires Jr, E.O.; Caleja, C.; Garcia, C.C.; Ferreira, I.C.; Barros, L. Current status of genus Impatiens: Bioactive compounds and natural pigments with health benefits. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 117, 106–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Osmolovskaya, N.; Shumilina, J.; Kim, A.; Didio, A.; Grishina, T.; Bilova, T.; Keltsieva, O.A.; Zhukov, V.; Tikhonovich, I.; Tarakhovskaya, E.; et al. Methodology of drought stress research: Experimental setup and physiological characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 4089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, X.; Song, S.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Dong, S. Transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of seedling-stage soybean responses to PEG-simulated drought stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pérez-Clemente, R.M.; Gόmez-Canedas, A. In vitro Tissue Culture, a Tool for the Study and Breeding of Plants Subjected to Abiotic Stress Conditions. In Recent Advances in Plant in Vitro Culture; Leva, A., Rinaldi, L.M.R., Eds.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2007; pp. 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ogbaga, C.C.; Amir, M.; Bano, H.; Chater, C.C.; Jellason, N.P. Clarity on frequently asked questions about drought measurements in plant physiology. Sci. Afr. 2020, 8, e00405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Burnett, S.; van Iersel, M.; Thomas, P. PEG-8000 alters morphology and nutrient concentration of hydroponic Impatiens. HortScience 2005, 40, 1768–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liao, X.L.; Wen, G.Q.; Liu, Q.L.; Li, X.Y.; Wu, M.X.; Oan, Y.Z. The drought-stress response of a drought resistant Impatiens processed in PEG-6000 solution in a simulation test. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1611.04425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lau, S.E.; Hadman, V.F.; Pua, T.L.; Saidi, N.B.; Tan, B.C. Plant nitric oxide signaling under drought stress. Plants 2021, 10, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 1962, 15, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Carillo, P.; Gibon, Y. PROTOCOL: Extraction and Determination of Proline. Prometheus, Protocols in Ecological & Environmental Science. 2011. Available online: https://prometheusprotocols.net/function/tissue-chemistry/primary-metabolites/extraction-and-determination-of-proline/ (accessed on 13 January 2021).
  32. Lichtenthaler, H.K. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987, 148, 350–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolation Chloroplast I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968, 125, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Velikova, V.; Yordanov, I.; Edreva, A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000, 151, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Singleton, V.L.; Orthofer, R.; Lamuela-Raventós, R.M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 299, 152–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, J.K.; Noh, J.H.; Lee, S.E.; Choi, J.S.; Suh, H.S.; Chung, H.Y.; Song, Y.O.; Choi, W.C. The first total synthesis of 2,3,6-tribromo-4,5-dihydroxybenzyl methyl ether (TDB) and its antioxidant activity. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2002, 23, 661–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ðurić, M.; Subotić, A.; Prokić, L.; Trifunović-Momčilov, M.; Cingel, A.; Vujičić, M.; Milošević, S. Morpho-physiological and molecular evaluation of drought and recovery in Impatiens walleriana grown ex vitro. Plants 2020, 9, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Beyer, W.F.; Fridowich, I. Assaying for superoxide dismutase activity: Some large consequences of minor changes in conditions. Anal. Biochem. 1987, 161, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984, 105, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kukavica, B.; Veljović-Jovanović, S. Senescence-related changes in antioxidant status of ginkgo and birch leaves during autumn yellowing. Physiol. Plant. 2004, 122, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Milošević, S.; Simonović, A.; Cingel, A.; Jevremović, S.; Todorović, S.; Filipović, B.; Subotić, A. Response of antioxidative enzymes to long-term Tomato spotted wilt virus infection and virus elimination by meristem-tip culture in two Impatiens species. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 79, 79–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zargar, S.M.; Gupta, N.; Nazir, M.; Mahajan, R.; Malik, F.A.; Sofi, N.R.; Shikari, A.B.; Salgotra, R.K. Impact of drought on photosynthesis: Molecular perspective. Plant Gene 2017, 11, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fang, Y.; Xiong, L. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2015, 72, 673–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Savvides, A.; Ali, S.; Tester, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Chemical priming of plants against multiple abiotic stresses: Mission possible? Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kaur, G.; Asthir, B. Proline: A key player in plant abiotic stress tolerance. Biol. Plant. 2015, 59, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cui, Z.H.; Bi, W.L.; Hao, X.Y.; Xu, Y.; Li, P.M.; Walker, M.A.; Wang, Q.C. Responses of in vitro-grown plantlets (Vitis vinifera) to grapevine leafroll-associated virus-3 and PEG-induced drought stress. Front. Physiol. 2016, 7, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Hernández-Pérez, C.A.; Gómez-Merino, F.C.; Spinoso-Castillo, J.L.; Bello-Bello, J.J. In vitro screening of sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp. hybrids) for tolerance to polyethylene glycol-induced water stress. Agronomy 2021, 11, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Martínez-Santos, E.; Cruz-Cruz, C.A.; Spinoso-Castillo, J.L.; Bello-Bello, J.J. In vitro response of vanilla (Vanilla planifolia Jacks. ex Andrews) to PEG-induced osmotic stress. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 22611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chavoushi, M.; Najafi, F.; Salimi, A.; Angaji, S.A. Improvement in drought stress tolerance of safflower during vegetative growth by exogenous application of salicylic acid and sodium nitroprusside. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 134, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jafari, M.; Shahsavar, A.R. Sodium nitroprusside: Its beneficial role in drought stress tolerance of “Mexican lime” (Citrus aurantifolia (Christ.) Swingle) under in vitro conditions. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant 2022, 58, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Meena, M.; Kumari, D.; Kumar, S.; Swapnil, P.; Zehra, A.; Shukla, V.; Yadav, M.; Upadhyay, R.S. Regulation of L-proline biosynthesis, signal transduction, transport accumulation and its vital role in plants during variable environmental conditions. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kovalikova, Z.; Jiroutova, P.; Toman, J.; Dobrovolna, D.; Drbohlavova, L. Physiological responses of apple and cherry in vitro culture under different levels of drought stress. Agonomy 2020, 10, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Molnar, S.; Clapa, D.; Mitre, V. Response of the five highbush blueberry cultivars to in vitro induced drought stress by polyethylene glycol. Agronomy 2022, 12, 732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. García-Valenzuela, X.; García-Moya, E.; Rascón-Cruz, Q.; Herrera-Estrella, L.; Aguado-Santacruz, G.A. Chlorophyll accumulation is enhanced by osmotic stress in graminaceous Chlorophyllic cells. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 650–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. García-Morales, S.; Gómez-Merino, F.C.; Trejo-Téllez, L.I.; Tavitas-Fuentes, L.; Hernández-Aragón, L. Osmotic stress affects growth, content of Chlorophyll, abscisic acid, Na+, and K+, and expression of novel NAC genes in contrasting rice cultivars. Biol. Plant. 2018, 62, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Khodabin, G.; Tahmasebi-Sarvestani, Z.; Rad, A.H.S.; Modarres-Sanavy, S.A.M. Effect of drought stress on certain morphological and physiological characteristics of a resistant and a sensitive canola cultivar. Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 17, e190039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zhang, J.; Liu, J.; Yang, C.; Du, S.; Yang, W. Photosynthetic performance of soybean plants to water deficit under high and low light intensity. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 105, 279–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tang, Y.; Sun, X.; Wen, T.; Liu, M.; Yang, M.; Chen, X. Implications of terminal oxidase function in regulation of salicylic acid on soybean seedling photosynthetic performance under water stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 112, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ashrafi, M.; Azimi-Moqadam, M.R.; MohseniFard, E.; Shekari, F.; Jafary, H.; Moradi, P.; Pucci, M.; Abate, G.; Mastinu, A. Physiological and molecular aspects of two Thymus species differently sensitive to drought stress. BioTech 2022, 11, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Karimi, A.; Tabari, M.; Javanmard, Z.; Bader, M.K.F. Drought effects on morpho-physiological and biochemical traits in persian oak and black poplar seedlings. Forests 2022, 13, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cechin, I.; Cardoso, G.S.; Fumis, T.F.; Corniani, N. Nitric oxide reduces oxidative damage induced by water stress in sunflower plants. Plant Prot. 2015, 74, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ayala, A.; Muñoz, M.F.; Argüelles, S. Lipid Peroxidation: Production, Metabolism, and Signaling Mechanisms of Malondialdehyde and 4-Hydroxy-2-Nonenal. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2014, 2014, 360438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jothimani, K.; Arulbalachandra, D. Physiological and biochemical studies of black gram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) under polyethylene glycol induced drought stress. Biocatal. Agric. Biotech. 2020, 29, 101777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Jia, P.; Melnyk, A.; Li, L.; Kong, X.; Dai, H.; Zhang, Z.; Butenko, S. Effects of drought and rehydration on the growth and physiological characteristics of mustard seedlings. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2021, 22, 836–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Nahar, K.; Hossain, M.S.; Anee, T.I.; Parvin, K.; Fujita, M. Nitric oxide pretreatment enhances antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems to confer PEG-induced oxidative stress in rapeseed. J. Plant Interact. 2017, 12, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sahay, S.; Khan, E.; Gupta, M. Nitric oxide and abscisic acid protects against PEG-induced drought stress differentially in Brassica genotypes by combining the role of stress modulators, markers and antioxidants. Nitric Oxide 2019, 89, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hamurcu, M.; Khan, M.K.; Pandey, A.; Ozdemir, C.; Avsaroglu, Z.Z.; Elbasan, F.; Omay, A.H.; Gezgin, S. Nitric oxide regulates watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) responses to drought stress. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ziogas, V.; Tanou, G.; Filippou, P.; Diamantidis, G.; Vasilakakis, M.; Fotopoulos, V.; Molassiotis, A. Nitrosative responses in citrus plants exposed to six abiotic stress conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 38, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abid, M.; Ali, S.; Qi, L.K.; Zahoor, R.; Tian, Z.; Jiang, D.; Snider, J.L.; Dai, T. Physiological and biochemical changes during drought and recovery periods at tillering and jointing stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Islam, M.J.; Uddin, M.J.; Anwar Hossain, M.A.; Henry, R.; Begum, M.K.; Sohel, M.A.T.; Mou, M.A.; Ahn, J.; Cheong, E.J.; Lim, Y.S. Exogenous putrescine attenuates the negative impact of drought stress by modulating physio-biochemical traits and gene expression in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gao, H.J.; Zhao, F.; Yang, J.X.; Yang, H.Q. Nitric oxide alleviates lipid peroxidation induced by osmotic stress during senescence of detached leaves of Malus hupehensis Rehd. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ghassemi-Golezani, K.; Farhadi, N.; Nikpour-Rashidabad, N. Responses of in vitro-cultured Allium hirtifolium to exogenous sodium nitroprusside under PEG-imposed drought stress. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2018, 133, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sekita, M.C.; Dias, D.C.F.S.; Pinheiro, D.T.; da Silva, A.L.; Matos, A.C.B.; da Silva, L.J. Nitric oxide in physiological potential and biochemical mechanisms of pea seeds under water deficit. J. Seed Sci. 2018, 44, e202244016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Santisree, P.; Bhatnagar-Mathur, P.; Sharma, K.K. NO to drought multifunctional role of nitric oxide in plant drought: Do we have all the answers? Plant Sci. 2015, 239, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Šamec, D.; Karalija, E.; Šola, I.; Vujčić Bok, V.; Salopek-Sondi, B. The role of polyphenols in abiotic stress response: The influence of molecular structure. Plants 2021, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Rehman, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Landi, M.; Zheng, B. Response of phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Shallan, M.A.; Hassan, H.M.M.; Namich, A.A.M.; Ibrahim, A.A. Effect of sodium niroprusside, putrescine and glycine betaine on alleviation of drought stress in cotton plant. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2012, 12, 1252–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Habib, N.; Ali, Q.; Ali, S.; Javed, M.T.; Haider, M.Z.; Perveen, R.; Shahid, M.R.; Rizwan, M.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Elkelish, A.; et al. Use of nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide for better yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under water deficit conditions: Growth, osmoregulation, and antioxidative defense mechanism. Plants 2020, 9, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liang, D.; Shen, Y.; Ni, Z.; Wang, Q.; Lei, Z.; Xu, N.; Deng, Q.; Lin, L.; Wang, J.; Lv, X.; et al. Exogenous melatonin application delays senescence of kiwifruit leaves by regulating the antioxidant capacity and biosynthesis of flavonoids. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chaves, N.; Santiago, A.; Alías, J.C. Quantification of the antioxidant activity of plant extracts: Analysis of sensitivity and hierarchization based on the method used. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Khan, R.T.; Gerdezi, S.D.A.; Habib, T.; Abbas, S.R. DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical scavenging activity of tomato genotypes against peg simulated drought stress. Pak. J. Bot. 2019, 51, 1249–1253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Siswoyo, T.A.; Arum, L.S.; Sanjaya, B.R.L.; Aisyah, Z.S. The growth responses and antioxidant capabilities of melinjo (Gnetum gnemon L.) in different durations of drought stress. Ann. Agric. Sci. 2021, 66, 81–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ahmad, M.A.; Javed, R.; Adeel, M.; Rizwan, M.; Yang, Y. PEG 6000-stimulated drought stress improves the attributes of in vitro growth, steviol glycosides production, and antioxidant activities in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Plants 2020, 9, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Sardoei, A.S.; Khalili, H. Nitric oxide signaling pathway in medicinal plants. Cell. Mol. Biomed. Rep. 2022, 2, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rajput, V.D.; Harish; Singh, R.K.; Verma, K.K.; Sharma, L.; Quiroz-Figueroa, F.R.; Meena, M.; Gour, V.S.; Minkina, T.; Sushkova, S.; et al. Recent developments in enzymatic antioxidant defence mechanism in plants with special reference to abiotic stress. Biology 2021, 10, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Qayyum, A.; Razzaq, A.; Bibi, Y.; Khan, S.U.; Abbasi, K.S.; Sher, A.; Mehmood, A.; Ahmed, W.; Mahmood, I.; Manaf, A.; et al. Water stress effects on biochemical traits and antioxidant activities of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under in vitro conditions. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B—Soil Plant Sci. 2018, 68, 283–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Laus, M.N.; De Santis, M.A.; Flagella, Z.; Socci, M. Changes in antioxidant defence system in durum wheat under hyperosmotic stress: A concise overview. Plants 2022, 11, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, C.; Wan, Y.; Shang, X.; Fang, S. Responses of microstructure, ultrastructure and antioxidant enzyme activity to PEG-induced drought stress in Cyclocarya paliurus seedlings. Forest 2022, 13, 836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Murthy, S.M.; Devaraj, V.R.; Anitha, P.; Tejavathi, D.H. Studies on the activities of antioxidant enzymes under induced drought stress in in vivo and in vitro plants of Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc. Recent Res. Sci. Technol. 2012, 4, 34–37. [Google Scholar]
  92. Silva, E.N.; Silveira, J.A.G.; Aragão, R.M.; Vieira, C.F.; Carvalho, F.E.L. Photosynthesis impairment and oxidative stress in Jatropha curcas exposed to drought are partially dependent on decreased catalase activity. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2019, 41, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Awan, S.A.; Khan, I.; Rizwan, M.; Zhang, X.; Brestic, M.; Khan, A.; El-Sheikh, M.A.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Ali, S.; Huang, L. Exogenous abscisic acid and jasmonic acid restrain polyethylene glycol-induced drought by improving the growth and antioxidative enzyme activities in pearl millet. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 172, 809–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhao, Y.; Wei, X.; Long, Y.; Ji, X. Transcriptional analysis reveals sodium nitroprusside affects alfalfain response to PEG-induced osmotic stress at germination stage. Protoplasma 2020, 257, 1345–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sheikhaliyan, M.; Sohrabi, Y.; Hossainpanahi, F.; ShiraniRad, A. Effect of sodium nitroprusside on physiological traits and grain yield of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) under different irrigation regimes. Gesunde Pflanz. 2022, 74, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Hatamzadeh, A.; Molaahmad Nalousi, A.; Ghasemnezhad, M.; Biglouei, M.H. The potential of nitric oxide for reducing oxidative damage induced by drought stress in two turfgrass species, creeping bentgrass and tall fescue. Grass Forage Sci. 2015, 70, 538–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Aalam, L.; Sedghi, M.; Sofalian, O. Sodium nitroprusside and salicylic acid decrease antioxidant enzymes activity in soybean. Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 10, 3073–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Agriculture 13 01903 g001
Figure 1. Experimental design including different pre-treatments and treatment patterns.
Figure 1. Experimental design including different pre-treatments and treatment patterns.
Agriculture 13 01903 g001
Agriculture 13 01903 g002
Figure 2. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on growth and morphology of Impatiens walleriana shoots after four weeks in vitro. Bars indicate 10 mm.
Figure 2. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on growth and morphology of Impatiens walleriana shoots after four weeks in vitro. Bars indicate 10 mm.
Agriculture 13 01903 g002
Agriculture 13 01903 g003
Figure 3. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on proline content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on proline content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01903 g003
Agriculture 13 01903 g004
Figure 4. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on total Chlorophyll content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on total Chlorophyll content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01903 g004
Agriculture 13 01903 g005
Figure 5. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on total carotenoid content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 5. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on total carotenoid content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01903 g005
Agriculture 13 01903 g006
Figure 6. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on MDA content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 6. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on MDA content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01903 g006
Agriculture 13 01903 g007
Figure 7. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on H2O2 content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 7. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on H2O2 content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01903 g007
Agriculture 13 01903 g008
Figure 8. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on total phenolic content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 8. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on total phenolic content in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01903 g008
Agriculture 13 01903 g009
Figure 9. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on DPPH activity in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 9. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on DPPH activity in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01903 g009
Agriculture 13 01903 g010
Figure 10. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on SOD activity in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 10. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on SOD activity in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01903 g010
Agriculture 13 01903 g011
Figure 11. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on CAT activity in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 11. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on CAT activity in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01903 g011
Agriculture 13 01903 g012
Figure 12. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on POX activity in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 12. The effect of different SNP pretreatments and PEG and/or SNP treatments on POX activity in I. walleriana shoots grown under PEG-induced water deficit. Data represent means ± standard errors. Means marked with different letters are significantly different from control according to the LSD test and can be compared among each other (p ≤ 0.05).
Agriculture 13 01903 g012
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Đurić, M.; Trifunović-Momčilov, M.; Milošević, S.; Marković, M.; Radulović, O.; Subotić, A.; Uzelac, B. Does Sodium Nitroprusside Alleviate Water Deficit Stress in Impatiens walleriana Shoots Grown In Vitro? Agriculture 2023, 13, 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101903

AMA Style

Đurić M, Trifunović-Momčilov M, Milošević S, Marković M, Radulović O, Subotić A, Uzelac B. Does Sodium Nitroprusside Alleviate Water Deficit Stress in Impatiens walleriana Shoots Grown In Vitro? Agriculture. 2023; 13(10):1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101903

Chicago/Turabian Style

Đurić, Marija, Milana Trifunović-Momčilov, Snežana Milošević, Marija Marković, Olga Radulović, Angelina Subotić, and Branka Uzelac. 2023. "Does Sodium Nitroprusside Alleviate Water Deficit Stress in Impatiens walleriana Shoots Grown In Vitro?" Agriculture 13, no. 10: 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101903

APA Style

Đurić, M., Trifunović-Momčilov, M., Milošević, S., Marković, M., Radulović, O., Subotić, A., & Uzelac, B. (2023). Does Sodium Nitroprusside Alleviate Water Deficit Stress in Impatiens walleriana Shoots Grown In Vitro? Agriculture, 13(10), 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101903

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop