Tourists’ Preferences for Traditional Food Products as Indicators of the Market Potential of Underutilised Species in Cambodia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methodology
2.1. Research Conceptualisation and Characterisation of Selected TFPs
2.2. Data Collection and Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Respondent Characteristics
3.2. Familiarity with Local TFPs
3.3. Knowledge, Factors and Barriers Influencing Attitudes towards TFPs
3.4. Expenses on Local TFPs
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions and Policy Implications
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Policy Implications and Recommendations
5.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gee, Y.G.; Maken, J.C.; Choy, D.J. The Travel Industry, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 1–494. [Google Scholar]
- Sabbe, S.; Verbeke, W.; Deliza, R.; Matta, V.M.; Van Damme, P. Consumer liking of fruit juices with different açaí (Euterpe oleracea Mart.) concentrations. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, S171–S176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, D.; Duncan, T. Back to the future: The affective power of food in reconstructing a tourist imaginary. In The Future of Food Tourism, Foodies, Experiences, Exclusivity, Visions and Political Capital; Aspects of Tourism 41; Yeoman, I., McMahon-Beattie, U., Fields, K., Albrecht, J.N., Meethan, K., Eds.; Channel View Publications: Bristol, UK, 2015; pp. 143–156. [Google Scholar]
- World Tourism Organization. Available online: https://affiliatemembers.unwto.org/sites/all/files/pdf/gastronomy_report_web.pdf (accessed on 12 June 2017).
- Hall, C.M.; Sharples, L.; Mitchell, R.; Macionis, N.; Cambourne, B. Food Tourism around the World, 1st ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2003; pp. 1–392. [Google Scholar]
- Torres, R. Towards a better understanding of tourism and agriculture linkages in the Yucatan: Tourist food consumption and preferences. Tour. Geogr. 2002, 4, 282–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sengel, T.; Karagoz, A.; Cetin, G.; Dincer, F.I.; Ertugral, S.M.; Balik, M. Tourists’ approach to local food. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 195, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Smithers, J.; Lamarche, J.; Joseph, A.E. Unpacking the terms of engagement with local food at the farmers’ market: Insights from Ontario. J. Rural Stud. 2008, 24, 337–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boesen, M.; Sundbo, D.; Sundbo, J. Local food and tourism: An entrepreneurial network approach. Scand. J. Hosp. Tour. 2017, 17, 76–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choe, J.Y.J.; Kim, S.S. Effects of tourists’ local food consumption value on attitude, food destination image, and behavioral intention. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 71, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amuquandoh, F.E.; Asafo-Adjei, R. Traditional food preferences of tourists in Ghana. Br. Food J. 2013, 115, 987–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diedrich, A.; García-Buades, E. Local perceptions of tourism as indicators of destination decline. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsay, D. Testing the safety of phytochemicals. In Phytochemical Functional Foods, 1st ed.; Johnson, I., Williamson, G., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2003; pp. 222–237. [Google Scholar]
- Trichopoulou, A.; Soukara, S.; Vasilopoulou, E. Traditional foods: A science and society perspective. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2007, 18, 420–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hermann, M. The impact of the European Novel Food Regulation on trade and food innovation based on traditional plant foods from developing countries. Food Policy 2009, 34, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caselato-Sousa, V.M.; Amaya-Farfan, J. State of knowledge on amaranth grain: A comprehensive review. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, R93–R104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- IPGRI. Neglected and Underutilised Plant Species: Strategic Action Plan of the International Plant Genetic Resources Institute; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute: Rome, Italy, 2002; pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Tourism of Cambodia, Statistics and Tourism Information Department. Tourism Statistics Report. 2021. Available online: https://www.nagacorp.com/eng/ir/tourism/tourism_statistics_202112.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2022).
- Ministry of Tourism of Cambodia. Roadmap for Recovery of Cambodia Tourism during and Post COVID-19. Available online: https://ibccambodia.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Eng_Roadmap_Translation-Final-1.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2022).
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/222 of 5 February 2016 Entering a Name in the Register of Protected Designations of Origin and Protected Geographical Indications (Mrech Kampot)/Poivre de Kampot (PGI)). Available online: https://www.cambodiaip.gov.kh/DocResources/1374ec4f-f0dd-4741-a473-895852166d29_007729c5-60a9-47f0-83ac-7f70420b9a34-en.pdf (accessed on 11 July 2020).
- Verner, V.; Novy, P.; Tauchen, J.; Huml, L.; Wong Soon, J.; Kudera, T.; Laupua, F.; Kokoska, L. Diversity, economic value and regional distribution of plant food products at local tropical markets: A Samoa case study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture: Trends and Challenges; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2017; pp. 1–180. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Once Neglected, These Traditional Crops Are Our New Rising Stars. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fao-stories/article/en/c/1154584/ (accessed on 19 June 2020).
- Li, X.; Siddique, K.H.M. Future Smart Food—Rediscovering Hidden Treasures of Neglected and Underutilised Species for Zero Hunger in Asia; FAO: Bangkok, Thailand, 2018; pp. 1–242. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, R.; Charters, S.; Albrecht, J.N. Cultural systems and the wine tourism product. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 311–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, R.; Bhanja, N. Consumer preferences for wine attributes in an emerging market. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2018, 46, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistics Division. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home (accessed on 12 September 2021).
- Marie-Vivien, D.; Chabrol, D. Geographical Indications (GIs), Biodiversity and Poor Communities. The Opportunities of GIs to Provide Protection of Traditional Indigenous Biodiversity Products and Benefits to Poor Agricultural Communities: A Desk Study of Six Target Countries (Cambodia, Laos, Indonesia, Vietnam, Ethiopia, Mauritania); CIRAD: Montpellier, France, 2014; pp. 1–80.
- Waard, P.W.F. Current state and prospective trends of Black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) production. Outlook Agric. 1986, 15, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morm, E.; Ma, K.; Horn, S.; Debaste, F.; Haut, B.; In, S. Experimental characterisation of the drying of Kampot red pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Foods 2020, 9, 1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pospelova, I.N. Geographical indications as a tool for increasing the sustainability of the development of agricultural regions. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 981, 022079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vengaiah, P.C.; Murthy, G.N.; Sattiraju, M.; Maheswarappa, H.P. Vale added food products from Palmyrah palm (Borassus flabellifer L.). J. Nutr. Health Sci. 2017, 4, 105. [Google Scholar]
- Le, D.H.T.; Lu, W.C.; Li, P.H. Sustainable processes and chemical characterisation of natural food additives: Palmyra palm (Borassus flabellifer Linn.) granulated sugar. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2650. [Google Scholar]
- Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/542 of 2 April 2019 Entering a Name in the Register of Protected Designations of Origin and Protected Geographical Indications (Skor Thnot Kampong Speu (PGI)). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019R0542&rid=10 (accessed on 11 July 2020).
- IRRI (International Rice Research Institute). Available online: http://books.irri.org/AR2010_content.pdf (accessed on 11 July 2020).
- Rohman, A.; Helmiyati, S.; Hapsari, M.; Setyaningrum, D.L. Rice in health and nutrition. Int. Food Res. J. 2014, 21, 13–24. [Google Scholar]
- Seila, S.; Gilbert, R.G.; Marks, G.C. Household rice choice and consumption behavior across agro-climatic zones of Cambodia. J. Hunger Environ. Nutr. 2012, 7, 333–346. [Google Scholar]
- Chun, J.A.; Li, S.; Wang, Q.G.; Lee, W.S.; Lee, E.J.; Horstmann, N.; Park, H.; Veasna, T.; Vanndy, L.; Pros, K.; et al. Assessing rice productivity and adaptation strategies for Southeast Asia under climate change through multi-scale crop modeling. Agric. Syst. 2016, 143, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ek, S.; Setka, S.; Mithona, A.; Seiha, T.; Thong, K.; Saio, K. Quality and safety of Cambodian rice. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 2018, 24, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chim, C.; Ito, K.; Hamano, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Mom, S. Processing of Sraa sor (rice liquor) in Takeo province, Cambodia. Int. J. Environ. Rural Dev. 2011, 2, 30–35. [Google Scholar]
- Chim, C.; Chakriya, N.; Dina, K.; Hamano, M. Improvement of Khmer traditional rice liquor (sraa sor) productivity using different fermentation conditions. Int. J. Environ. Rural Dev. 2012, 3, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
- Van den Bergh, M.H. Minor vegetables. In Plant Resources of South-East Asia, No 8, Vegetables; Siemonsma, J.S., Piluek, K., Eds.; Pudoc Scientific Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1993; p. 290. [Google Scholar]
- Schmelzer, G.H. Medicinal and poisonous plants. In Medicinal and Poisonous Plants 2; Van Valkenburg, J.L.C.H., Bunyapraphatsara, N., Eds.; Backhuys Publishers: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2001; p. 341. [Google Scholar]
- Gorai, D.; Jash, S.K.; Singh, R.K.; Gangopadhyay, A. Chemical and pharmacological aspects of Limnophila aromatica (Scrophulariaceae): An overview. AJPCT 2014, 2, 348–356. [Google Scholar]
- Rifai, M.A. Bouea macrophylla Griffith. In Plant Resources of South-East Asia No 2: Edible Fruits and Nuts; Verheij, E.W.M., Coronel, R.E., Eds.; PROSEA Foundation: Bogor, Indonesia, 1992; pp. 104–105. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, T.K. Edible Medicinal and Non-Medicinal Plants, 1st ed.; Springer Science & Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 69–71. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Tourism of Cambodia, Statistics and Tourism Information Department. Tourism Statistics Report. 2017. Available online: https://www.tourismcambodia.com/img/resources/cambodia_tourism_statistics_2017.pdf (accessed on 7 May 2018).
- Haas, R.; Canavari, M.; Imami, D.; Gjonbalaj, M.; Gjoka, E.; Zvyagintsev, D. Attitudes and preferences of Kosovar consumer segments toward quality attribudes of milk and dairy products. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2016, 28, 407–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Udomkun, P.; Ilukor, J.; Mockshell, J.; Mujawamariya, G.; Okafor, C.; Bullock, R.; Nabahungu, N.L.; Vanlauwe, B. What are the key factors influencing consumers’ preference and willingness to pay for meat products in Eastern DRC? Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 6, 2321–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saaty, T.L. A scaling method for priorities in a hierarchical structure. J. Math. Psych. 1977, 15, 234–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kattiyapornpong, U.; Miller, K.E. Social structure and psychographic explanations of destination preference of Australians’ travel to South-East Asia. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2011, 16, 39–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anson, T.H.M.; Chow, A.S.Y.; Cheung, L.T.O.; Lee, K.M.Y.; Liu, S. Impacts of tourists’ socio-demographic characteristics on the travel motivation and satisfaction: The case of protected areas in South China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3388. [Google Scholar]
- Hsu, F.C.; Robinson, R.N.S.; Scott, N. Traditional food consumption behaviour: The case of Taiwan. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2018, 43, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suttikun, C.; Chang, H.J.; Acho, C.S.; Ubi, M.; Bicksler, H.; Komolsevin, R.; Chongsithiphol, S. Sociodemographic and travel characteristics affecting the purpose of selecting Bangkok as a tourist destination. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2018, 18, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lunchaprasith, T.; Macleod, D. Food tourism and the use of authenticity in Thailand. Tour. Cult. Commun. 2018, 2, 84–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Do, Q.D.; Angkawijaya, A.E.; Phuong, L.T.N.; Huynh, L.H.; Soetaredjo, F.E.; Ismadji, S.; Ju, Y.H. Effect of extraction solvent on total phenol content, total flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of Limnophila aromatica. J. Food Drug Anal. 2014, 22, 296–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rondevaldova, J.; Novy, P.; Tauchen, J.; Drabek, O.; Kotikova, Z.; Jerabkova, J.; Chrun, R.; Nguon, S.; Kokoska, L. Determination of antioxidants, minerals and vitamins in Cambodian underutilised fruits and vegetables. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2023, 17, 716–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mockaitis, A.I.; Salciuviene, L.; Ghauri, P.N. On what do consumer product preferences depend? Determining domestic versus foreign product preferences in an emerging economy market. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2013, 25, 166–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pedersen, S.; Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Thogersen, J. Consumers’ evaluation of imported organic food products: The role of geographical distance. Appetite 2018, 130, 134–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birch, D.; Memery, J. Tourists, local food and the intention-behaviour gap. J. Hosp. Manag. Tour. 2020, 43, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgogno, M.; Favotto, S.; Corazzin, M.; Cardello, A.V.; Piasentiera, E. The role of product familiarity and consumer involvement on liking and perceptions of fresh meat. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 44, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheron, E.; Hayashi, H. The effect of respondents’ nationality and familiarity with a product category on the importance of product attributes in consumer choice: Globalisation and the evaluation of domestic and foreign products. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 2001, 43, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mekoth, N.; Thomson, A.R. Food preferences and culture: The influence of nationality and religion among tourists visiting Goa. Tour. Cult. Commun. 2018, 18, 191–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dano, D.; Michel, M.; Astier, C.; Couratier, P.; Steenbeek, N.; Sarr, P.Y.; Bonnefoy, M.; Boulangé, M.; Kanny, G. Impact of food allergies on the allergic person’s travel decision, trip organisation and stay abroad. Glob. J. Allergy 2015, 1, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
- Knotek, K.; Verner, V.; Chaloupkova, P.; Kokoska, L. Prevalence and use of herbal products in the Czech Republic: Over-the-counter survey among adult pharmacies clients. Complement. Ther. Med. 2012, 20, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaloupkova, P.; Petrtyl, M.; Verner, V.; Kokoska, L. Dietary supplements versus functional foods: Consumers’ attitudes to their consumption. Br. Food J. 2020, 122, 3853–3868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.Y. The importance of traditional market and travel motivation in Korea Gwangjang market. TMC Acad. J. 2017, 12, 37–48. [Google Scholar]
Traditional Food Product | Characterisation | Product Category |
---|---|---|
Cambodian red wine | Wine from grapes (fruits of Vitis vinifera L.) grown in certain Cambodian regions. | C |
Kampot pepper | Green, black, red and white peppercorns of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) grown and produced in Kampot Province. Red peppercorns are especially rare due to their unique processing method. Red fully ripened berries are picked, then blanched, sun-dried and sorted through numerous selective sessions to obtain only a few exceptional corns per harvest. | C |
Kramsang | Green fruit of the wood apple tree [Citrus lucida (Scheff.) Mabb.] used as a vegetable. | U |
Ma-om | Rice paddy herb [Limnophila aromatica (Lam.) Merr.] used as a flavouring agent and condiment in traditional Cambodian soup dishes. | U |
Maprang | The orange or yellow fruit of the mango plum (Bouea macrophylla Griff.) resembling a mango with a sweet-sour flavour and a slight turpentine odour. | U |
Palm sugar | Sweetener derived from palmyra palm (Borassus flabellifer L.). | C |
Rumduol rice | Jasmine-like fragrant Cambodian rice cultivar (Oryza sativa ‘Phka Rumduol’). | C |
Samraong | A beverage made from the Malva nut tree [Scaphium affine (Mast.) Pierre] with seeds soaked in water yielding “Malva nut juice”, occasionally flavoured with pandan, cinnamon, honey or sugar. | U |
Sraa sor | Alcoholic liquor made from rice (Oryza sativa L.). | C |
Wild grape wine | A red wine made from wild grapes (fruits of Ampelocissus martini Planch.) harvested from plants growing in the forest. | U |
Variable | Definition |
---|---|
Dependent variables | |
Knowing local TFPs | Dummy: 1, if the respondent knew local TFP |
Expenditures on local TFPs | Expenditure for one purchase of a local TFP (<2 US$; 3–5 US$; >6 US$) |
Information sources used to know about local TFPs | |
Open sources (internet, travel guides, mass media) | Dummy: 1, if the respondent used open source before travelling to Cambodia |
Tourist infrastructure (hotels, restaurants, tourist guides) | Dummy: 1, if the respondent received information from local tourist infrastructure |
Local markets or pubs | Dummy: 1, if the respondent followed recommendations from local markets or pubs |
Family and friends | Dummy: 1, if the respondent followed recommendations from friends or family |
TFP-related personal barriers | |
Fear of possible health effects | Dummy: 1, if the respondent linked local TFP with potential health effects |
Poor attraction (smell, taste) | Dummy: 1, if the respondent associated local TFP with poor smell or taste |
Dietary habits (vegetarian, vegan) | Dummy: 1, if the respondent considered dietary habits when trying local TFP |
Motivations to try local TFPs | |
Interest in foreign cuisine | Dummy: 1, if the respondent liked foreign cuisine |
Interest in trying new TFPs | Dummy: 1, if the respondent liked to try new TFPs |
Recommendations from other people | Dummy: 1, if the respondent followed other people’s attitudes towards TFPs |
Affordable price of Cambodian TFPs | Dummy: 1, if the respondent considered the price for local TFPs as a reason to try |
Travel behaviour | |
Length of stay in Cambodia | Categorical: 1 = up to one week; 2 = up to one month; 3 = one month and more |
Socio-demographic characteristics | |
Gender | Dummy: 0 female; 1 male |
Age | Dummy: 0 youth (up to 30 years); 1 elder (31 years and older) |
Education | Dummy: 0 primary and secondary; 1 university and higher |
Marital status | Dummy: 0 married; 1 single |
Religion | Dummy: 0 atheist; 1 religious |
Categories | Variables | Total Sample (n = 1271) | TFP Users (n = 923) | TFP Non-Users (n = 348) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Female | 48.9 | 48.8 | 49.1 |
Male | 51.1 | 51.3 | 50.9 | |
Age | Youth (18–30 years) | 54.6 | 50.6 | 65.2 |
Elders (over 31 years) | 45.4 | 49.4 | 34.8 | |
Education | University degree | 77.7 | 79.1 | 73.8 |
Primary and secondary | 22.3 | 20.9 | 26.2 | |
Marital status | Single | 72.9 | 71.6 | 76.4 |
Other | 27.1 | 28.4 | 23.6 | |
Religion | Religious | 61.0 | 60.9 | 30.6 |
Non-religious | 39.0 | 39.1 | 69.4 | |
Length of stay in Cambodia | Up to 1 week | 45.7 | 37.7 | 66.7 |
Up to 1 month | 30.1 | 33.0 | 22.4 | |
1 month and longer | 24.2 | 29.3 | 10.9 | |
Origin | Europe | 44.7 | 46.9 | 38.8 |
Americas | 26.0 | 25.5 | 27.6 | |
Asia and the Pacific | 22.9 | 22.1 | 25.0 | |
Africa and the Middle East | 6.4 | 5.5 | 8.6 | |
Expenditure for local TFPs | Less than US$ 2 | … | 23.4 | … |
Between US$ 3–5 | … | 52.6 | … | |
More than US$ 6 | … | 24.0 | … |
Product | Kampot Pepper | Palm Sugar | Rumduol Rice | Ma-om | Sraa sor | Maprang | Kramsang | Cambodian Red Wine | Samraong | Wild Grape Wine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kampot pepper | - | 1.147 | 1.137 | 1.996 | 4.023 | 2.481 | 2.870 | 6.476 | 7.586 | 9.655 |
Palm sugar | 0.872 | - | 0.991 | 1.741 | 3.508 | 2.164 | 2.503 | 5.646 | 6.614 | 8.418 |
Rumduol rice | 0.879 | 1.009 | - | 1.756 | 3.538 | 2.182 | 2.524 | 5.695 | 6.671 | 8.491 |
Ma-om | 0.501 | 0.575 | 0.570 | - | 2.015 | 1.243 | 1.438 | 3.244 | 3.800 | 4.836 |
Sraa sor | 0.249 | 0.285 | 0.283 | 0.496 | - | 0.617 | 0.714 | 1.610 | 1.886 | 2.400 |
Maprang | 0.403 | 0.462 | 0.458 | 0.805 | 1.621 | - | 1.157 | 2.610 | 3.057 | 3.891 |
Kramsang | 0.348 | 0.400 | 0.396 | 0.695 | 1.402 | 0.864 | - | 2.256 | 2.643 | 3.364 |
Cambodian red wine | 0.154 | 0.177 | 0.176 | 0.308 | 0.621 | 0.383 | 0.443 | - | 1.171 | 1.491 |
Samraong | 0.132 | 0.151 | 0.150 | 0.263 | 0.530 | 0.327 | 0.378 | 0.854 | - | 1.273 |
Wild grape wine | 0.104 | 0.119 | 0.118 | 0.207 | 0.417 | 0.257 | 0.297 | 0.671 | 0.786 | - |
Socio-Demographic Characteristics | Product Preference (%) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conventional | Underutilised | |||||||||
Cambodian Red Wine | Kampot Pepper | Palm Sugar | Rumduol Rice | Sraa sor | Kramsang | Ma-om | Maprang | Samraong | Wild Grape Wine | |
Gender | ||||||||||
Male | 29.0 | 74.8 | 70.4 | 60.9 | 36.6 | 31.1 | 42.9 | 35.1 | 17.5 | 17.5 |
Female | 18.0 | 75.1 | 72.9 | 60.2 | 30.2 | 25.8 | 34.0 | 29.1 | 10.4 | 9.8 |
p-value | <0.001 | 0.969 | 0.402 | 0.836 | 0.041 | 0.075 | 0.005 | 0.052 | 0.002 | <0.001 |
Age | ||||||||||
Youth (18–30) | 24.0 | 70.7 | 68.1 | 56.5 | 28.3 | 28.5 | 36.6 | 29.1 | 13.7 | 12.0 |
Elders (>31) | 23.2 | 79.4 | 75.2 | 64.7 | 38.8 | 28.5 | 40.6 | 35.3 | 14.5 | 15.6 |
p-value | 0.792 | 0.002 | 0.016 | 0.011 | <0.001 | 0.992 | 0.217 | 0.044 | 0.737 | 0.115 |
Education | ||||||||||
University | 22.1 | 73.3 | 71.9 | 60.1 | 34.4 | 28.8 | 37.5 | 32.1 | 12.9 | 13.6 |
Non-university | 29.5 | 81.3 | 70.5 | 62.2 | 30.1 | 27.5 | 42.5 | 32.6 | 18.7 | 14.5 |
p-value | 0.030 | 0.023 | 0.691 | 0.606 | 0.257 | 0.721 | 0.209 | 0.876 | 0.040 | 0.734 |
Marital status | ||||||||||
Single | 23.6 | 74.3 | 67.2 | 57.5 | 33.4 | 29.3 | 36.6 | 31.3 | 13.8 | 13.8 |
Non-single | 23.7 | 76.7 | 82.8 | 68.3 | 33.6 | 26.3 | 43.5 | 34.4 | 14.9 | 13.7 |
p-value | 0.984 | 0.462 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.964 | 0.360 | 0.052 | 0.374 | 0.660 | 0.992 |
Religion | ||||||||||
Religious | 23.8 | 73.5 | 71.4 | 63.5 | 32.9 | 29.2 | 42.0 | 36.8 | 16.0 | 15.1 |
Non-religious | 23.3 | 77.3 | 72.0 | 56.0 | 34.3 | 27.4 | 33.2 | 24.9 | 11.1 | 11.6 |
p-value | 0.841 | 0.209 | 0.826 | 0.022 | 0.653 | 0.564 | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.035 | 0.113 |
Religion (groups) | ||||||||||
Atheists | 23.3 | 77.3 | 72.0 | 56.0 | 34.3 | 27.4 | 33.2 | 24.9 | 11.1 | 11.6 |
Buddhists | 43.1 | 80.0 | 86.2 | 75.4 | 49.2 | 40.0 | 55.4 | 58.5 | 23.1 | 32.3 |
Christians | 20.7 | 71.9 | 70.8 | 60.8 | 31.1 | 24.8 | 39.2 | 33.5 | 13.4 | 12.3 |
Muslims | 12.9 | 51.6 | 61.3 | 83.9 | 19.4 | 48.4 | 58.1 | 29.0 | 19.4 | 16.1 |
other | 26.3 | 81.8 | 66.7 | 59.6 | 33.3 | 32.3 | 38.4 | 37.4 | 20.2 | 14.1 |
p-value | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.046 | 0.003 | 0.025 | 0.009 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.027 | <0.001 |
Origin (continent) | ||||||||||
Europe | 21.6 | 77.0 | 70.9 | 58.3 | 34.2 | 28.2 | 36.5 | 30.0 | 13.8 | 10.1 |
Americas | 21.2 | 81.7 | 75.0 | 63.5 | 24.0 | 32.7 | 46.2 | 40.4 | 12.5 | 16.3 |
Asia & the Pacific | 31.9 | 69.6 | 72.5 | 59.3 | 35.3 | 27.0 | 38.7 | 32.4 | 15.7 | 20.6 |
Africa & the Middle East | 17.6 | 60.8 | 68.6 | 84.3 | 37.3 | 29.4 | 45.1 | 39.2 | 13.7 | 21.6 |
p-value | 0.016 | 0.005 | 0.794 | 0.003 | 0.177 | 0.757 | 0.218 | 0.131 | 0.877 | <0.001 |
Length of stay | ||||||||||
<1 week | 19.0 | 61.8 | 68.4 | 59.2 | 22.1 | 23.9 | 28.4 | 30.2 | 16.1 | 10.6 |
up to 1 month | 22.6 | 81.3 | 70.2 | 56.4 | 34.1 | 22.6 | 39.0 | 28.5 | 6.6 | 10.2 |
>1 month | 30.7 | 84.8 | 77.4 | 67.0 | 47.4 | 41.1 | 51.1 | 38.9 | 20.0 | 21.9 |
p-value | 0.003 | <0.001 | 0.038 | 0.027 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.018 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Expenditure on TFP | ||||||||||
<2 USD | 24.1 | 73.6 | 71.8 | 56.5 | 35.6 | 31.5 | 43.5 | 25.5 | 12.5 | 9.3 |
3–5 USD | 23.3 | 74.9 | 71.4 | 61.7 | 31.3 | 26.1 | 36.8 | 32.5 | 10.9 | 13.6 |
>6 USD | 24.0 | 76.5 | 71.9 | 62.0 | 36.2 | 30.8 | 37.6 | 38.0 | 22.6 | 18.6 |
p-value | 0.962 | 0.736 | 0.987 | 0.373 | 0.325 | 0.242 | 0.229 | 0.019 | <0.001 | 0.019 |
TFP | Underutilised TFPs Users | Conventional TFPs Users | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | Coef. | S. E. | C. I. | Coef. | S. E. | C. I. |
Internet, travel guides, mass media | 0.47 *** | 0.13 | (0.21; 0.72) | 1.78 *** | 0.47 | (0.86; 2.69) |
Tourist infrastructure | 0.18 | 0.11 | (−0.04; 0.39) | 0.87 ** | 0.32 | (0.24; 1.50) |
Local markets or pubs | 0.30 *** | 0.09 | (0.12; 0.48) | 0.56 ** | 0.19 | (0.19; 0.93) |
Family and friends | 0.15 | 0.11 | (−0.06; 0.35) | 2.73 *** | 0.42 | (1.90; 3.56) |
Local person suggestion | 0.42 *** | 0.09 | (0.24; 0.61) | 0.56 ** | 0.21 | (0.15; 0.96) |
Fear of possible health effects | −0.17 * | 0.09 | (−0.34; 0.01) | 0.01 | 0.16 | (−0.31; 0.33) |
Poor presentation (smell, taste) | −0.14 | 0.11 | (−0.36; 0.09) | 0.02 | 0.19 | (−0.34; 0.38) |
Interest in foreign cuisine | 0.58 *** | 0.09 | (0.41; 0.76) | 1.98 *** | 0.20 | (1.59; 2.38) |
Interest in trying new TFPs | 0.38 *** | 0.09 | (0.21; 0.55) | 1.98 *** | 0.20 | (1.59; 2.38) |
Affordable price of Cambodian TFPs | −0.06 | 0.14 | (−0.33; 0.21) | 0.80 ** | 0.35 | (0.11; 1.49) |
Length of stay in Cambodia | 0.20 *** | 0.05 | (0.10; 0.30) | 0.17 * | 0.09 | (−0.01; 0.35) |
Gender | 0.19 ** | 0.08 | (0.02; 0.35) | 0.01 | 0.15 | (−0.28; 0.30) |
Age | −0.02 | 0.09 | (−0.20; 0.17) | −0.35 ** | 0.17 | (−0.67; −0.02) |
Education | 0.01 | 0.10 | (−0.19; 0.20) | 0.10 | 0.17 | (−0.23; 0.43) |
Marital status | −0.03 | 0.10 | (−0.22; 0.17) | −0.18 | 0.18 | (−0.53; 0.18) |
Religion | 0.24 ** | 0.08 | (0.08; 0.40) | −0.17 | 0.15 | (−0.47; 0.12) |
Constant | −1.30 *** | 0.22 | (−1.74; −0.86) | −1.88 *** | 0.49 | (−2.85; −0.92) |
Wald χ2(34) | 429.50 | 0.0000 |
Variable | Coef. | S. E. | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|
Information sources on TFPs | |||
Open sources (internet, travel guides, mass media) | 0.118 | 0.111 | 0.289 |
Tourist infrastructure (hotels and restaurants) | 0.266 | 0.099 | 0.007 |
Local markets or pubs | −0.064 | 0.084 | 0.451 |
Family and friends | 0.155 | 0.094 | 0.098 |
Suggestions from local person restaurants/supermarkets | 0.055 | 0.083 | 0.506 |
Attitudes towards local TFPs | |||
Fear of possible health effects | −0.180 | 0.086 | 0.037 |
Poor presentation (smell, taste) | −0.291 | 0.112 | 0.009 |
Interest in foreign cuisine | 0.130 | 0.084 | 0.121 |
Interest in trying new TFPs | 0.003 | 0.084 | 0.972 |
Affordable price of Cambodian TFPs | −0.070 | 0.117 | 0.552 |
Length of stay in Cambodia | −0.039 | 0.049 | 0.422 |
Purchasing places for TFPs | |||
Street market | −0.295 | 0.094 | 0.002 |
Restaurants and hotels | 0.109 | 0.087 | 0.212 |
Socio-demographic characteristics | |||
Gender | 0.164 | 0.078 | 0.035 |
Age | −0.034 | 0.088 | 0.702 |
Education | 0.024 | 0.094 | 0.800 |
Marital status | −0.248 | 0.095 | 0.009 |
Religion | 0.167 | 0.078 | 0.032 |
/cut1 | −1.267 | 0.258 | −1.772 |
/cut2 | 0.247 | 0.255 | −0.253 |
LR χ2(20) | 80.60 | 0.000 | |
Pseudo R2 | 0.043 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Verner, V.; Kosova, M.; Chaloupkova, P.; Nguon, S.; Van Damme, P.; Kokoska, L. Tourists’ Preferences for Traditional Food Products as Indicators of the Market Potential of Underutilised Species in Cambodia. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081599
Verner V, Kosova M, Chaloupkova P, Nguon S, Van Damme P, Kokoska L. Tourists’ Preferences for Traditional Food Products as Indicators of the Market Potential of Underutilised Species in Cambodia. Agriculture. 2023; 13(8):1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081599
Chicago/Turabian StyleVerner, Vladimir, Monika Kosova, Petra Chaloupkova, Samnang Nguon, Patrick Van Damme, and Ladislav Kokoska. 2023. "Tourists’ Preferences for Traditional Food Products as Indicators of the Market Potential of Underutilised Species in Cambodia" Agriculture 13, no. 8: 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081599
APA StyleVerner, V., Kosova, M., Chaloupkova, P., Nguon, S., Van Damme, P., & Kokoska, L. (2023). Tourists’ Preferences for Traditional Food Products as Indicators of the Market Potential of Underutilised Species in Cambodia. Agriculture, 13(8), 1599. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081599